Midtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis: Final Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Midtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis: Final Report MIDTOWN CORRIDOR ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS FINAL REPORT APRIL 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary i Introduction 1 Study Area Existing Conditions 7 Project Goals 11 Initial Alternatives 15 Concept Development 21 Results & Evaluation 30 Locally Preferred Alternative Recommendation 37 Next Steps 41 For additional project information, please see online project library Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Midtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis throughout the AA process to guide the project meets these needs The following five broad goals (AA) evaluated the benefits, costs, and impacts Besides the formal committee structure, the were established to guide the project process: of implementing a transitway in the Midtown process also included a multitude of public out- Corridor – a corridor located in the City of Min- reach and events all designed to meet people 1. Increase transit use among the growing neapolis, Minnesota The study was initiated to ‘where they were’ (i e , at community events and number of corridor residents, employees, and identify a transit alternative that best meets the neighborhood gatherings) instead of insisting the visitors transportation needs of the local community in public come to the project terms of technical feasibility, costs, and benefits 2. Improve corridor equity with better mobility and access to jobs and activities Project Purpose and Goals Project Process and Public 3. Catalyze and support housing and economic Involvement The purpose of the Midtown Corridor Transitway development along the corridor Project is to provide transit service that meets cur- The AA was an 18 month collaborative effort rent and future travel needs, attracts new riders, 4. Develop a cost-effective transitway that is between Metro Transit, the City of Minneapo- connects users with job centers and key desti- well-positioned for implementation lis, Hennepin County, the Metropolitan Council nations, and supports environmentally sustain- and multiple community businesses, groups able growth and development The AA sought to 5. Build upon the vibrancy and diversity of the and stakeholders Stakeholders from these determine the type of transit investment that best corridor by supporting healthy, active com- groups staffed four project committees that met munities and the environment ) n o i Study Area s n e Blue Line LRT t x Lake of the Isles E e in L Hennepin Ave Bloomington Bloomington Lyndale Ave Lyndale Ave Nicollet Chicago Ave Ave Cedar n I-35W Ave Portland e re (G Midtown Greenway T LR W S Lake Street Lake Calhoun = Transit Center 0 0.25 miles 0.5 Executive Summary i Determining the Alternatives Also, an enhanced bus extension was designed analysis demonstrated that the dual alternative, and studied in response to stakeholder feedback with the enhanced bus extension, was the stron- The project initially considered ten transitway The enhanced bus extension extended transit gest alternative Public feedback from a series of alternatives Each one combined an alignment service from the project study area into Saint Paul public meetings and an online survey supported within the corridor –Lake Street, the Midtown to connect with the METRO Green Line LRT this conclusions Greenway, or both – with a transit mode The 10 initial combinations are shown below Analyzing the Alternatives Project Outcome: Locally Alternatives Initially Under Consider- Preferred Alternative ation The study analyzed the benefits, costs, and impacts of the three most promising alternatives Recommendation and the enhanced bus extension The cost esti- Lake Street After reviewing the technical results and listening mate and ridership projections are highlighted 1. Enhanced Bus to feedback from the project committees and the on the next page 2. Streetcar public, the project’s Policy Advisory Committee (PAC) unanimously recommended the dual alter- 3. Light Rail Transit (LRT) Evaluating the Alternatives native, with the enhanced bus extension to Saint 4. Dedicated Busway Paul, as the locally preferred alternative (LPA) for The results of each alternative’s benefits, costs, and the Midtown Corridor Midtown Greenway impacts were comparatively evaluated against 5. Double/Single-Track Rail each other The results of the technical 6. Full Double-Track Rail 7. Dedicated Busway 8. Personal Rapid Transit 9. Commuter Rail 10. Streetcar Lake Street/Greenway Loop A collaborative, iterative process, based on dis- cussions with stakeholders, was used to narrow down the initial set of alternatives down to the three most promising alternatives within the cor- ridor Those alternatives were: • Enhanced bus on Lake Street • Double/single-track rail in the Greenway • Dual alternative (i e , a combination of enhanced bus on Lake Street and rail in the Greenway) Midtown Corridor Lake Street ii Executive Summary Cost Estimates Next Steps Capital Operating The Metropolitan Council is in the process of Alternative Costs Costs (annual) updating the region’s Transportation Policy Plan, which guides the development of the region’s Enhanced Bus $50 million $7 million transportation system The Midtown Corridor LPA will be incorporated into the Transportation Pol- Rail $185 - 220 million $8 million icy Plan during this planning process Due to the funding constraints facing the region, the corridor Dual $215 - 250 million $15 million will mostly likely appear as an unfunded corridor in the 2014 Transportation Policy Plan update Ridership Projections (Year 2030) However, it is possible that the project will move forward in phases Considering the funding situa- Local Enhanced Bus Corridor Alternative Rail tion, it is likely that the enhanced bus alignment, Bus Study Extended Total the less expensive portion of the project, will be Area Corridor implemented first Existing (2012) 14,600 – – – 14,600 Also, as one of the earlier steps on the way towards 394 DOWNTOWN Enhanced Bus 8,500 – 11,000 3,000 MINNEAPOLIS22,500 the implementation of a transitway, the AA pro- cess is designed to study a corridor at a relatively Rail 9,500 11,000 – – W FRANKLIN AVE 20,500 GREEN LINE LRT high-level 94 Future phases of study will addressUniversity/ the project in greater detail Spruce Tree Dual Alignment394 6,000 9,500 8,500 8,000 32,000 SOUTHWEST LRT DOWNTOWN th W 26TH ST (GREEN LINE EXTENSION) Calhoun Hennepin Lyndale Nicollet 5 Chicago Bloomington Minnehaha MINNEAPOLISBeach Ave S Ave Ave Ave Ave Ave Ave Cleveland 31st Ave 44th Ave Otis Ave Ave Fry Street The Dual Alternative + Enhanced Bus Extension LAKE STREET W FRANKLIN AVE GREEN LINE LRT Portland Bloomington Cedar West Lake Hennepin Nicollet 94 36th Ave E 32ND ST Cretin Ave Fairview Ave Ave Ave Ave Ave University/ Station Ave S Spruce Tree Dupont Lyndale I-35 Chicago Midtown 1/2-MILE BUFFER SUMMIT AVE LAKE Ave Ave S (Stevens/2nd) Ave Station CALHOUN R SOUTHWEST LRT E th ORANGE LINE BRT W 36TH ST W 26TH ST V (GREEN LINE EXTENSION) Calhoun Hennepin Lyndale Nicollet 5 Chicago Bloomington Minnehaha I R Beach EXCELSIOR BLVDAve Ave Ave Ave Ave I Ave S Ave P P ClevelandI 35W S S 31st Ave 44th Ave Otis Ave I Ave Fry Street S SNELLING AVE S I 55 BLUE LINE M HENNEPIN AVE LAKE STREET LRT LYNDALE AVE LYNDALE CHICAGO AVE CHICAGO NICOLLET AVE BLOOMINGTON AVE BLOOMINGTON Hennepin Nicollet Portland Bloomington Cedar E 32ND ST West Lake Ave Ave Ave 36th Ave Cretin Ave Fairview Ave Station Ave S Ave Dupont Lyndale I-35 Chicago Midtown 1/2-MILE BUFFER SUMMIT AVE LAKE Ave Ave S (Stevens/2nd) Ave Station CALHOUN R E ORANGE LINE BRT W 36TH ST V I R EXCELSIOR BLVD I Legend P P I 35W S S Double/SingleI Track and Station S SNELLING AVE S EnhancedI Bus Alternative 55 BLUE LINE M HENNEPIN AVE Intermodal 0 1500 3000 6000 LRT LYNDALE AVE LYNDALE CHICAGO AVE CHICAGO NICOLLET AVE Enhanced Bus Extension Station BLOOMINGTON AVE BLOOMINGTON Executive Summary iii Legend Double/Single Track and Station Enhanced Bus Alternative 0 1500 3000 6000 Intermodal Enhanced Bus Extension Station This page left intentionally blank iv INTRODUCTION Metro Transit, in partnership with Hennepin County and the City of Minneapolis, conducted an 18-month alternatives analysis (AA) to identify possible transit improvements in the Midtown Corridor The study was initiated to identify a transit alternative that best meets the transpor- tation needs of the local community in terms of technical feasibility, costs, and benefits The proj- ect study area is shown in Figure 1 The AA was collaborative effort between Metro Transit, the City of Minneapolis, Hennepin County, the Metropolitan Council and multiple community businesses, groups and stakeholders How to Use this Document This report provides a high level overview of the AA process Detailed technical documenta- tion and technical results are contained in the project’s technical memorandums and appen- dices These documents are referenced with hyperlinks throughout the document Click- ing a hyperlink will download a PDF of the referenced material All project documenta- tion can also be found at the project website: www.midtowntransitway.org A view of the Midtown Exchange Building and surrounding neighborhood in the Midtown Corridor Introduction 1 Figure 1: Study Area 2 Introduction What Is an Alternatives Analysis (AA)? An AA is a planning study that follows Federal Transit Administration (FTA) guidelines to develop and evaluate transit alternatives An AA analyzes the benefits, cost and impacts associated with various transit alternatives and is the first step towards federal funding of a transitway project AA Study Process: The 18 month AA study process fell
Recommended publications
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0046 (Oct. 1990) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property ____ __ historic name Sears, Roebuck and Company Mail-Order Warehouse and Retail Store other names/site number Midtown Exchange 2. Location street & number 2929 Chicago Avenue South N/A D not for publication city or town Minneapolis N/A D vicinity state Minnesota code MN county Hennepin code 053 zip code 55407 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this ^nomination D request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property E3 meets D does not meet the National Register Criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Bicycle Commuting in Minneapolis: How Much Do Bicycle-Oriented Paths
    A STUDY OF BICYCLE COMMUTING IN MINNEAPOLIS: HOW MUCH DO BICYCLE-ORIENTED PATHS INCREASE RIDERSHIP AND WHAT CAN BE DONE TO FURTHER USE? by EMMA PACHUTA A THESIS Presented to the Department of Planning, Public Policy and Management and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of 1-1aster of Community and Regional Planning June 2010 11 ''A Study of Bicycle Commuting in Minneapolis: How Much do Bicycle-Oriented Paths Increase Ridership and What Can be Done to Further Use?" a thesis prepared by Emma R. Pachuta in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Community and Regional Planning degree in the Department of Planning, Public Policy and Management. This thesis has been approved and accepted by: - _ Dr. Jean oclcard, Chair of the ~_ . I) .).j}(I) Date {).:........:::.=...-.-/---------'-------'-----.~--------------- Committee in Charge: Dr. Jean Stockard Dr. Marc Schlossberg, AICP Lisa Peterson-Bender, AICP Accepted by: 111 An Abstract of the Thesis of Emma Pachuta for the degree of Master of Community and Regional Planning in the Department of Planning, Public Policy and Management to be taken June 2010 Title: A STUDY OF BICYCLE COMMUTING IN MINNEAPOLIS: HOW MUCH DO BICYCLE-ORIENTED PATHS INCREASE RIDERSHIP AND WHAT CAN BE DONE TO FURTHER USE? Approved: _~~ _ Dr. Jean"'stockard Car use has become the dominant form of transportation, contributing to the health, environmental, and sprawl issues our nation is facing. Alternative modes of transport within urban environments are viable options in alleviating many of these problems. This thesis looks the habits and trends of bicyclists along the Midtown Greenway, a bicycle/pedestrian pathway that runs through Minneapolis, Minnesota and questions whether implementing non-auto throughways has encouraged bicyclists to bike further and to more destinations since its completion in 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • The Southwest LRT Corridor: Connecting People to Jobs, Housing, Shopping, and Fun
    Southwest LRT Community Works Vision Adopted by the Southwest LRT Community Works Steering Committee on April 21, 2011 The Southwest LRT corridor: connecting people to jobs, housing, shopping, and fun. The Southwest Community Works Initiative collaborates with citizens, businesses, and government to align land use and transit planning so that the Southwest LRT Corridor is a premiere destination that is · accessible · livable · vibrant Economic competitiveness and job growth Promoting opportunities for business and employment growth Housing choices Positioning the Southwest LRT communities as a place for all to live Quality neighborhoods Creating unique, vibrant, safe, beautiful, and walkable station areas Critical connections Improving affordable regional mobility for all users The Southwest LRT Corridor now and in the future is a: Jobs corridor: Within 1/2 mile: 210,000 jobs now; 270,000 by 2030 1,000 construction jobs per year (2014-2016) Housing corridor: Within 1/2 mile: 31,000 housing units now; over 40,000 by 2030 Growth corridor: Within 1/2 mile: 60,000 population now; 75,000 by 2030 Commuter corridor: Nearly 30,000 daily trips by 2030 High reverse commute ridership; over 7,000 daily trips by 2030 Southwest LRT Community Works Adopted Vision Statement The Southwest LRT Community Works Initiative collaborates with citizens, businesses and government to align land use and transit planning so that the Southwest LRT Corridor is a premiere destination that is accessible, livable and vibrant. Guiding Principles These Guiding Principles are a reflection of the cooperative efforts underway between the jurisdictions in the Southwest LRT Corridor to guide land use and economic development in and around station areas in a transit-supportive manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Next Steps Study
    Prepared for: City of Englewood 1000 Englewood Parkway Englewood, CO 80110-2373 City of Sheridan 4101 S. Federal Boulevard Sheridan, CO 80110-5399 Prepared by: Felsburg Holt & Ullevig 6300 S. Syracuse Way, Suite 600 Centennial, CO 80111 In Association With: ArLand LLC Bachman PR Design Workshop Toole Design Group Table of Contents Page Executive Summary -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ES-1 Acknowledgements ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ES-18 1.0 Introduction -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 1.1 Study Location and Description -------------------------------------------------2 1.2 Vision ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5 1.3 Objectives ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 5 1.4 Planning Context ---------------------------------------------------------------- 5 1.4.1 South Santa Fe Drive Corridor Improvements Study ------------------- 6 1.4.2 North Englewood Small Area Plan -------------------------------------- 6 1.4.3 CityCenter Englewood: Redevelopment of the Cinderella City Mall -- 6 1.4.4 Englewood Industrial Urban Renewal Plan and the General Ironworks Development Plan ------------------------------------------- 7 1.4.5 Southwest Light Rail Transit Line Major Investment Study ------------- 7 1.4.6 Englewood Civic Center Pedestrian Underpass Feasibility Study ----- 7
    [Show full text]
  • To Read the Nokomis Messenger Article About Becketwood Composting
    AUGUST 2012 Vol. 29 No. 6 21,000 Circulation Your Neighborhood Newspaper For Over Twenty Years extensive community outreach, soliciting input on redevelopment of the Hiawatha Corridor. ‘Elevated Beer’ to “Not one responder ever said that we need another liquor store,” Krause said, “not one. No INSIDE one feels our community is un- derserviced in that area.” bring craft beer, wine A current ordinance states that no liquor store may operate within 300 feet of a church or Features.........2 school. Krause said the intention to Hiawatha this fall is to separate consumption of al- cohol from children. But that or- dinance does not cover daycare centers, and one is two doors away from the proposed liquor store and will share its parking lot. “The daycare owner is Mus- lim, and had he known a liquor store would be adjacent, he Eco-friendly policies wouldn’t have opened there,” Krause said. at Becketwood “I don’t want or need another competitor, but beyond that, there are better uses for that retail space,” Krause continued. “But as a landlord, the building owner News..................3 has a mortgage to pay and needs to rent to anyone willing to pay rent. I see both sides. No one is evil in this issue.” Another Longfellow business owner said he had concerns with panhandlers and transients in the area, but he blames the city for not including daycare centers under its ordinance. As for Adam Aded, owner of Xcel releases Ruwayda Child Care Center, he Craft beer and wine lovers in the Longfellow area will have another source to choose from when Elevated Beer, indicated that he is not against substation design Wine and Spirits opens this fall at 4135 Hiawatha Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • The South Gateway: Increasing the Viability of Penn Station in Bryn Mawr
    T H E SOUTH GATEWAY Increasing the viability of Penn Station in Bryn Mawr Consultants Arthur Huang Brian McLafferty Marshall Moore Kay Qualley 2011 Table of Contents Executive Summary 1 Part I: Introduction 2 Part II: Diagnosis 7 Background 8 Station Area Description 15 Previous Station Area Planning Efforts 18 Bryn Mawr Survey 21 Stakeholder Analysis 24 SWOT Analysis 26 Problem Statement 30 Part III: Vision 31 Part IV: Action Plan 40 Articulate Regional Development Goals 41 Expand Housing Options 42 Improve Neighborhood Mobility 45 Increase Regional Connectivity 53 Preserve Natural Resources 56 Create a Sense of Place 60 Part V: Appendix 63 Map of Southwest LRT Corridor 64 Southwest LRT Planning Process Timeline 65 Funding Toolkit 66 Bryn Mawr Survey Tabulation 68 Shade Tree Recommendations 73 Bibliography 74 PART I: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Penn Station, Bryn Mawr’s proposed light rail transit (LRT) This vision seeks to address concerns about Penn Station stop on the yet-to-be-built Southwest LRT Corridor, is at feasibility by pursuing five regional development goals: risk of being excluded from the project as a result of high • Expanded housing options in the station area engineering costs and low daily originated ridership figures. • Improved mobility within the neighborhood This possibility is a concern to residents living in the • Increased regional connectivity station’s vicinity, many of whom desire access to LRT service • A healthy natural environment and are supportive of the Penn Station proposal. The purpose • A sense of neighborhood identity of this plan is to help Penn Station advocates isolate, and potentially mitigate, the most significant barriers to Penn Station viability.
    [Show full text]
  • Southwest Light Rail Transit a New Transportation Alternative for Eden Prairie
    SEPTEMBER–OCTOBER 2013 edenprairie.org SOUTHWEST LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT A New Transportation Alternative for Eden Prairie Alternatives for improved transit in the Southwest Corridor have been under study by the Metropolitan Council since the completion of the Hwy. 169/I-494 interchange. It is projected that as the mid-1980s. In November 2009 the Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority (HCRRA) recommended the numbers of people and jobs in the corridor increase, traffic congestion construction of a light rail transit (LRT) line connecting Eden Prairie with jobs, medical services, restaurants and will worsen, making the area less economically attractive — unless new entertainment in Minnetonka, Hopkins, St. Louis Park and Minneapolis. This Southwest LRT route would also connect transportation options are created. Multiple studies conducted by state and directly to the Central Corridor LRT becoming part of the Green Line with direct service to the University of Minnesota regional agencies project that as the numbers of people and jobs in the and St. Paul. Southwest Corridor increase, traffic congestion will worsen, which could make The proposed Southwest Green Line Extension would also allow transfers near Target Field to access the Blue Line the area less economically attractive if additional transportation options are not (Hiawatha LRT, in service since 2004) with service to Minneapolis-Saint Paul International Airport as well as the in place. The resulting comprehensive evaluation of transportation alternatives Northstar commuter rail line. shows that light rail transit is the best option for maintaining mobility in the Southwest Corridor, connecting employers and workers and mitigating the As currently proposed, the line would be 15.8 miles long with 17 stations expected to open in 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Permit 16-221 Metropolitan Council METRO Green Line LRT .Pdf
    Permit Application No.: 16-221 Rules: Erosion Control, Stormwater Management, Waterbody Crossings and Structures, Shoreline and Streambank Stabilization, Floodplain Alteration, Wetland Protection Applicant: Metropolitan Council Received: 5/03/2016 Project: METRO Green Line LRT Extension (SWLRT) Complete: 1/13/2017 Location: Hopkins, St. Louis Park, and Minneapolis Noticed: 1/13/2017 Recommendation: Approval of MCWD permit application with the following conditions: Submission of documentation of acquisition by the applicant of all necessary property-use rights within a Segment before any work in the Segment begins (providing for issuance of permits on a Segment-by- Segment basis). Completion of a draft Public Entity Maintenance Agreement for Stormwater Management BMPs and waterbody crossings for approval by MCWD staff prior and execution. In addition, staff recommends that the managers’ approval include delegation of authority to approve requests for Amendments to permit 16-221, unless a request requires approval of a variance. (The administrator would have the discretion to bring any request to the board if it raises a policy, technical or legal question that, in his view, should be considered by the board.) Background The Metropolitan Council (Applicant) has applied for a Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD or District) permit as part of the METRO Green Line LRT Extension (SWLRT) Project (Project), a proposed 14.5 mile light rail transit line from Eden Prairie to downtown Minneapolis. The Project area within the MCWD traverses the cities of Hopkins, St. Louis Park, and Minneapolis and involves approximately five miles of freight rail, light rail, and paved trail construction along with the construction of six stations and construction of three park-and-ride lots.
    [Show full text]
  • Request for Proposals
    REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS Southwest LRT Community Works Transitional Station Area Action Plans Date of Issue: February 21, 2012 Date Due: March 26, 2012 Issued by Hennepin County in partnership with the cities of Minneapolis, St. Louis Park, Hopkins, Minnetonka, Eden Prairie, and Edina as part of the Southwest LRT Community Works Project. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................... 3 PURPOSE ........................................................................................................................................... 3 BUDGET AND TIMELINE .................................................................................................................... 4 PROJECT BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................... 4 EXPERTISE......................................................................................................................................... 5 SCOPE OF SERVICES ................................................................................................................. 6 TASK 1: STATION AREA PARK/RIDE AND PLATFORM ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS.............................. 6 TASK 2: ACCESS/CIRCULATION PLANS ............................................................................................. 6 TASK 3: INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Midtown Greenway and the Social Landscape of Minneapolis, Minnesota
    Macalester College DigitalCommons@Macalester College Geography Honors Projects Geography Department Spring 2010 A Greenway Runs Through it: The idtM own Greenway and the Social Landscape of Minneapolis, Minnesota Aaron M. Brown Macalester College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/geography_honors Part of the Human Geography Commons, Urban, Community and Regional Planning Commons, Urban Studies Commons, and the Urban Studies and Planning Commons Recommended Citation Brown, Aaron M., "A Greenway Runs Through it: The idtM own Greenway and the Social Landscape of Minneapolis, Minnesota" (2010). Geography Honors Projects. Paper 21. http://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/geography_honors/21 This Honors Project - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Geography Department at DigitalCommons@Macalester College. It has been accepted for inclusion in Geography Honors Projects by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Macalester College. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Greenway Runs Through it: The Midtown Greenway and the Social Landscape of Minneapolis, Minnesota Aaron Brown April 19, 2010 Honors Thesis Advisor: Dr. Laura Smith Department of Geography Macalester College Abstract Minneapolis‟ Midtown Greenway is a 5.5 mile bicycle and pedestrian corridor that replaced a grade-separated railroad line in 2000 and expanded to its current length in 2007. In an era of reinvestment in American inner cities and a heightened political awareness of both urban transportation alternatives and public spaces, the academic field of geography has much to contribute to the discussion about the viability, effectiveness, and success of projects such as this adaptive reuse of reclaimed, deindustrialized space.
    [Show full text]
  • South High Students Walk out to Support All Nations Program
    Old-fashioned One sort Roosevelt and market proposed recycling gives Wellstone: Two for Lake Street Mpls. a boost schools in one Page 2 Page 3 Page 7 Longfellow Nokomis Your community Messeng newspaper since 1982 April 2013 • Vol. 29 No. 2 www.LongfellowNokomisMessenger.com 21,000 Circulation assembly held prior to the walk- keys. However, after local Native Minneapolis Youth out. American activists insisted students Movement formed by “All recognized the need for had the right to get their things, South High students diversity and gave a powerful mes- administrators agreed to allow stu- students to bring about sage about learning and recogniz- dents back in one at a time with ing each other.” Bellanger. “I was supervision, according to W. changes in their school really impressed with them.” Vizenor. district walk out to support “If this is an example of the Students were also warned be- young people coming up, I’m very fore they left the building that their By TESHA M. CHRISTENSEN happy.” departure would constitute an un- What began as a protest by All Nations program excused absence and that they Native American students grew FROM ASSEMBLY would not be allowed back with- into a walkout that united all eth- out a parent. They were welcome nic groups at South High School TO WALK-OUT back the next day. on Monday, March 11. W. Vizenor had initially planned to Organizers estimate that 500- organize a walkout, but then WHAT’S NEXT? 1,000 students peacefully walked agreed to work with school staff to Following the walkout, 50 students out of the school in a show of soli- hold an assembly inside instead.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Design+Construction's
    ® WHERE TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION COLLIDE 35TH ANNUAL RECONSTRUCTION AWARDS The Best in Adaptive Reuse, Historic Preservation, and Renovation 25 NATIONAL ARTS CENTRE OTTAWA, ONT. LEED: A LEGACY Leaders across the globe have made LEED the most widely used green building program in the world. Leave your legacy today. #LEEDlegacy usgbc.org/LEED CIRCLE 751 11•18 | NOVEMBER | 54 25 66 CLOCKWISE FROM TOP LEFT: NICK MCGINN, DOW, UNIVERSITY OF STUTTGART NICK MCGINN, DOW, CLOCKWISE FROM TOP LEFT: FEATURES 20 TRENDSETTING PROJECTS 25 35TH ANNUAL Steel city remake: RECONSTRUCTION Pittsburgh pushes AWARDS mega–revitalization 26 Platinum Awards project 34 Gold Awards 40 Silver Awards 56 PRODUCT 44 Bronze Awards INNOVATIONS 50 Honorable Mentions Door access control goes ‘smart’ with phone-based DEPARTMENTS credentials CONTINUING 7 EDITORIAL 62 PRODUCTS AT EDUCATION WORK 9 NEWS+TRENDS Acoustic panels 10 Most Popular Global construction brighten school AIA Courses on set to rise to $12.9 cafeteria BDCuniverity trillion by 2022 66 GREAT SOLUTIONS 14 THINK TANK Canopy is p.54 Preventing damage reconfi gured by from cyberattacks drones on the fl y ON THE COVER: A hexagonal laminated timber coffer roof and decorative ceiling with built-in MEP/AV systems highlight the interior lobby at the National Arts Centre in Ottawa, Ont. The project is one of fi ve Gold Award winners in BD+C’s 35th 2014–2017 JESSE H. NEAL annual Reconstruction Awards. More on page 25. AWARD WINNER PHOTO: YOUNES BOUNHAR, DOUBLESPACE PHOTOGRAPHY BDCuniversity.com | BUILDING DESIGN+CONSTRUCTION | 3 | E-CONTENTS | BDCnetwork.com High humidity. Good for tree frogs, bad for bathrooms.
    [Show full text]