DOCSLIB.ORG

New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Et

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Et ,M In the Supreme Court of the United States ==================== ,CU7MPI1R?RC0GDJC.GQRMJQQMAG?RGML et al. Petitioners T )CTGL. PSCL GL&GQ-DDGAG?J!?N?AGRW?Q 1SNCPGLRCLBCLRMD,CU7MPI1R?RC.MJGAC et al. Respondents ==================== -L5PGRMD!CPRGMP?PGRMRFC3LGRCB1R?RCQ !MSPRMDNNC?JQDMPRFC1CAMLB!GPASGR ==================== 0'#$-$+'!'!30'# *5#,$-0!#+#,2%0-3.1,"122#," *-!*$'0#0+10'%&21%0-3.1 ',13..-02-$.#2'2'-,#01 +'!'*'12#"-,',1'"#!-4#0 ==================== ",+ .#2#01-, ",+ .#2#01-,.**! !&', 0'"%#0-" 12# $'0$6 4'0%',' B?LB?LNCRCPQMLJ?U AMK (SJW 2FCDMJJMUGLEQCTCLRCCLJ?UCLDMPACKCLREPMSNQ?LB QR?RC ?LB JMA?J DGPC?PKQ PGEFRQ EPMSNQ ?PC ?KGAG ASPG?CGLRFGQA?QC ,?RGML?J1FCPGDDQƃQQMAG?RGML ,CU7MPI1R?RC1FCPGDDQƃQQMAG?RGML ,?RGML?JQQMAG?RGMLMD!FGCDQMD.MJGAC 5CQRCPL1R?RCQ1FCPGDDQƃQQMAG?RGML !?JGDMPLG?1R?RC1FCPGDDQƃQQMAG?RGML 'LRCPL?RGML?J*?U#LDMPACKCLR#BSA?RMPQ?LB 2P?GLCPQQQMAG?RGML *?U#LDMPACKCLR*CE?J"CDCLQC$SLB 'LRCPL?RGML?JQQMAG?RGMLMD*?U#LDMPACKCLR $GPC?PKQ'LQRPSARMPQ 'LA PGBECTGJJC0GDJC?LB.GQRMJ!JS@ *RB "CJ?U?PC1R?RC1NMPRQKCLƃQQQMAG?RGML %SL-ULCPQƃARGML*C?ESC+?QQ?AFSQCRRQ %SL-ULCPQMD!?JGDMPLG? &?U?GG0GDJCQQMAG?RGML +?PWJ?LB1R?RC0GDJC.GQRMJQQMAG?RGML 4CPKMLR$CBCP?RGMLMD1NMPRQKCLƃQ!JS@Q 4CPKMLR1R?RC0GDJC.GQRMJQQMAG?RGML 4GPEGLG?1FMMRGLE1NMPRQQQMAG?RGML G 2 *#-$!-,2#,21 .?EC 2 *#-$32&-0'2'#1 GGG ',2#0#12-$AMICI CURIAE 13++07-$0%3+#,2 0%3+#,2 ' 0#!-%,'8',%2&#1#!-," +#,"+#,20'%&2-$-0"',07 *5 '"',%!'2'8#,12-!007 &,"%3,1$-0*5$3*.30.-1#1 !0#2#1*'22*#-0,-1$#270'1) ,CU7MPIƃQCVRPCKCJWPCQRPGARGTC JGACLQGLEQWQRCKNPCTCLRQKMQR,CU 7MPICPQDPMKCVCPAGQGLERFCGP1CAMLB KCLBKCLRPGEFRQ 2FGPRWWC?PQƃCVNCPGCLACUGRF GLAPC?QCBESLMULCPQFGN?LB JG@CP?JGXCBA?PPWJ?UQF?QLMRJCB RMGLAPC?QCBAPGKC ! !MLAC?JCBA?PPWNCPKGRFMJBCPQ GLƅQF?JJ GQQSCƆ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istrict of Columbia v. Heller 3 1 Kuck v. Danaher $ 1SNN B " !MLL Moore v. Madigan $ B RF!GP NYSRPA v. City of New York 1 !R People v. Aguilar , # B'JJ State v. Rosenthal 4R !-,12'232'-,1,"12232#1 3 1 !-,12 +#," '' passim 3 1 ! dE 3 1 !d 3 1 ! d! !MLL %CL 1R?R dƀ@ $J? 1R?R d GT , 7 .CL?J*?Ud @ , 7 .CL?J*?Ud L , 7 .CL?J*?Ud D -2&#032&-0'2'#1 @SQ?GB 1F?BBG After historically deadly 2020, Atlanta homicides are up nearly 60% in 2021 2*,2(-30,* !-,12'232'-,(SLC 2$# !-++#0!#',3 1 ,,3*122'12'!*3."2# 2$# ,,3*$'0#0+1+,3$!230',% ,"#6.-020#.-027#0$',* ?PRMXXG (MC Taking Stock of Record-Setting 2020 Firearm Year ,11$(?L P?L?Q !F?PJCQ! et al. Investigating the Link Between Gun Possession and Gun Assault K ( .S@ &C?JRF !?JD?Q (CLLGDCP%?H?L?L +?FGR? What to Know About the South Texas Church Shooting 2'+#,MT T !?QQCJJ .?SJ% Explaining the Recent Homicide Spikes in U.S. Cities: The "Minneapolis Effect" and the Decline in Proactive Policing $CB 1CLRƃE0CN ! 1.&'**7 !-+ Gunman Shot Dead Inside West Philadelphia Barbershop +?P !,, Security Guard Who Stopped Shooter Credits God "CA !MJJGLQ "?TGB BPD analysis uncovers revealing information about murder victims, suspects 5 * 24(?L !--) .&'*'.*3"5'% (#,1 %3,1', +#0'!0#13*21-$!-+.0#&#,1'4# ,2'-,*1304#7-$$'0#0+1 -5,#01&'.,"31# !PGD?QG !?QQ?LBP?) et al. Association Between Firearm Laws and Homicide in Urban Counties ( 3P@?L&C?JRF "MLMFSC (MFLet al. Right-to-Carry Laws and Violent Crime: A Comprehensive Assessment Using Panel Data and a State-Level Synthetic Control Analysis, ( #KNGPGA?J*CE?J1RSB #LEJGQF 5GJJG?K 2021 National Firearms Survey (SJ TG #LEJGQF 5GJJG?K The Right to Carry Has Not Increased Crime: Improving an Old Debate Through Better Data on Permit Growth Over Time(SJ $ '3!02?@JC 'LBCVMD !PGKC3LGRCB1R?RCQ $ '3!02?@JC !PGKCGLRFC 3LGRCB1R?RCQ@W4MJSKC?LB0?RCNCP 'LF?@GR?LRQ $ '3!02?@JC #VN?LBCB &MKGAGBC"?R?+SPBCP4GARGKQ @W5C?NML $ '3!02?@JC !PGKCGLRFC 3LGRCB1R?RCQ@W4MJSKC?LB0?RCNCP 'LF?@GR?LRQ $C?PLMU CLH?KGL Texas Allows Guns in Churches, Schools After Firearm Access Laws Expanded, Effective September 1 ,#515##) 1CN $*-0'""#.02+#,2-$%0'!3*230#," !-,13+#01#04'!#1 ..*'!2'-,1," "'1.-1'2'-,1 7!-3,27(3*7 ƀ(3,# $*-0'""#.02+#,2-$%0'!3*230#," !-,13+#01#04'!#1 !-,!#*#"5#.-, -0$'0#0+*'!#,1#13++070#.-02 -!2- #0 (3,# TGG $*-0'""#.02+#,2-$%0'!3*230#," !-,13+#01#04'!#1 ,3+ #0-$4*'"$*-0'" !-,!#*#"5#.-,*'!#,1#110#.-02#"2 2&##,"-$#!&$'1!*7#0(3,# 1',!#.0-%0+',!#.2'-,',-!2- #0 %GLU?JJ? 0?QFL? et al. Repeal of the Concealed Weapons Law and Its Impact on Gun-Related Injuries and Deaths, ( 2P?SK?ASRC !?PC1SPE &?KGJJ +?PI# et al. State Level Firearm Concealed-Carry Legislation and Rates of Homicide and Other Violent Crime ( KCP !MJJCECMD1SPECMLQ &CKCLU?W "?TGB1MJLGAI 1?P?( The Epidemiology of Self-Defense Gun Use: Evidence from the National Crime Victimization Surveys 2007-2011, .PCTCLRGTC+CB (MFLQML (?QML Why violent crime surged after police across America retreated 312-"7NP )JCAI %?PW%CPRX +?PA Armed Resistance to Crime: The Prevalence and Nature of Self-Defense with a Gun J. of Crim. Law and Criminology$?JJ TGGG )JCAI %?PW How Hemenway and Solnick Distorted the Effectiveness of Defensive Gun Use )*#!) %07 .-',2 *,) 0MSRJCBECCB )MNCJ "?TGB Arming the right people can save lives * 2'+#1(?L )MNCJ "?TGB .PCRCLB “Gun-Free” School Zones !-,, * 0#4 )MNCJ "?TGB Guns on University Campuses: The Colorado Experience, 2&#51&',%2-,.-12NP *?4?JJC (?KCQ+ “Gun Control” vs. “Self-Protection”: A Case against the Ideological Divide, (SQRGAC .MJGAW(MSPL?J *MRR (MFL0 (P 5?LE 0SHSL !PGKC .PCTCLRGML0CQC?PAF!CLRCP Concealed Carry Permit Holders Across the United States: 2020 +?A"ML?JB &C?RFCP A Year After George Floyd’s Murder, It’s “Open Season” in Minneapolis 5** 120##2(-30,*+?W GV +A#JPMW +?PHMPGC 5?LE .CGAFSL Seemingly Inextricable Dynamic Differences: The Case of Concealed Gun Permit, Violent Crime and State Panel Data(SLC +A%GLRW (M!P?TCL New York Killers, and Those Killed, by Numbers ,#57-0)2'+#1NP +'*53)##&-+'!'"#0#4'#5!-++'11'-, ,,3*0#.-02 &-+'!'"# ,",-, $2*1&--2',%1 +MMBW !?PJGQJC# +?PTCJJ 2FMK?Q The Right-to-Carry Laws: A Critique of the 2014 Version of Aneja, Donohue, and Zhang #AML ( 5?RAF ,2'-,*11-!'2'-,-$!&'#$1-$.-*'!# 12,,3*1304#7 ,2'-,*0#1#0!&!-3,!'* .0'-0'2'#1 $-00#1#0!&2-0#"3!#2&#2&0#2 -$$'0#0+ 0#*2#"4'-*#,!# NSSF Releases Most Recent Firearm Production Figures,MT .?EMLCQ 1RCNF?LGC Murder in LA County jumps over 95% so far this year, concealed carry permits on the rise: sheriff $-6,#51(SL V .?EMLCQ 1RCNF?LGC Over 440 LA County deputies have left this year, as sheriff calls violence, homelessness “existential threats,” $-6,#51(SL .-*'!#"#.02+#,2!'27-$,#57-0) +30"#0',,#57-0)!'27 .-*'!#-,# %3,.-*'!7*5 #,$-0!#+#,21304#7 0CARMP )CTGL Statistical snapshots from Baltimore's deadliest year: suspects, victims, and cops *2'+-0#13,(?L 0#32#01 Texas church shooter wore wig and fake beard, says security head who shot him "CA 1?EG %SW( 20 States Now Have Constitutional Carry ,01&--2',% '**31202#"NP 1FG 5CG*CC *SLE DCG The Effects of Gun Control on Crimes: A Spatial Interactive Fixed Effects Approach #KNGPGA?J#AMLMKGAQ 1GCECJ +GAF?CJ et al. Easiness of Legal Access to Concealed Firearm Permits and Homicide Rates in the United States K ( .S@ &C?JRF VG 1+02 0-1,, ET AL. 2&#1!'#,!#-$ %3,.-*'!7!0'2'!*17,2&#1'1-$ 0#1#0!&#4'"#,!#-,2&##$$#!21-$ %3,.-*'!'#1',2&#3,'2#"122#1 0,"!MPNMP?RGMLBCB 1KGRF +GAF?CJ0 .CRPMACJJG +?RRFCU The Effect of Concealed Handgun Carry Deregulation in Arizona on Crime in Tucson, !PGK (SQRGAC.MJ 0CT 1RCCJC JJGQML et al., More might have died if doctor had not shot gunman .&'* ',/3'0#0(SJ 1SJJSK (?AM@ A Survey Not Designed to Measure Defensive Gun Use Finds Little of It 0#1-,1CNR 2#61"#.02+#,2-$.3 *'!1$#27 !2'4# *'!#,1# !#02'$'#"',1203!2-0!-3,211 -$"#!#+ #0 2#61"#.02+#,2-$.3 *'!1$#27 !-,4'!2'-,02#1$-0&,"%3,*'!#,1# &-*"#010#.-02',%.#0'-" 3 1 !#,131 30#3 /3'!)$!212#61 5C@QRCP "?LGCJ5 et al Firearms on College Campuses: Research Evidence and Policy Implications-AR VGG 8GCXSJCUGAX %CMDD Uber driver, licensed to carry gun, shoots gunman in Logan Square !&' 20' 3,#NP ',2#0#12-$+'!'!30'# ,?RGML?J1FCPGDDQƃQQMAG?RGML 2FC,?RGML?J1FCPGDDQȲQQMAG?RGMLGQ?LML NPMDGR MPE?LGX?RGMLDMPKCBGL 'RUMPIQRMNPMKMRCRFC D?GP ?LB CDDGAGCLR ?BKGLGQRP?RGML MD APGKGL?J HSQRGAC RFPMSEFMSR RFC 3LGRCB 1R?RCQ ?LB RM NPMKMRC NPMRCAR ?LB NPCQCPTC RFC K?LW MDDGACQ MP BCN?PRKCLRQMDMSPAMSLRPWȲQQFCPGDDQ 2FC,1F?Q MTCP KCK@CPQ?LBGQ?QRPMLE?BTMA?RCDMPMTCP GLBGTGBS?J QFCPGDDQ JMA?RCB RFPMSEFMSR RFC L?RGML ,CU7MPI1R?RC1FCPGDDQƃQQMAG?RGML 2FC,CU7MPI1R?RC1FCPGDDQƃQQMAG?RGMLGQ?LMR DMP NPMDGR AMPNMP?RGML DMPKCB DMP RFC NSPNMQC MD ?QQGQRGLE QFCPGDDQ GL RFC CDDGAGCLR ?LB CDDCARGTC BCJGTCPWMDQCPTGACQRMRFCNS@JGA 'RAMKNPGQCQ?JJ CJCARCB ?LB ?NNMGLRCB
Load more

Recommended publications
  • License to Kill How Lax Concealed Carry Laws Can Combine with Stand Your Ground Laws to Produce Deadly Results
    AP PHOTO/SETH PERLMAN PHOTO/SETH AP License to Kill How Lax Concealed Carry Laws Can Combine with Stand Your Ground Laws to Produce Deadly Results By Arkadi Gerney and Chelsea Parsons September 2013 WWW.AMERICANPROGRESS.ORG Introduction and summary The shooting death of Trayvon Martin and George Zimmerman’s subsequent acquittal have focused the nation’s attention on expansive self-defense laws—so- called Stand Your Ground laws—that enable an individual to use deadly force even in situations in which lesser force would suffice or in which the individual could safely retreat to avoid further danger. Leaders from around the country, including President Barack Obama5 and U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder,6 have questioned how Florida’s law—which is similar to laws enacted in 21 other states—may have contributed to the circumstances that led to Martin’s death. Yet the Martin case also implicates another set of laws: the state laws governing who may carry concealed firearms—the laws that put a gun in Zimmerman’s hands in the first place. Under Florida law, even individuals such as Zimmerman, who have a criminal history and a record of domestic abuse, are generally entitled to a concealed carry permit, as long as they are not barred from gun possession under federal law and as long as their offense does not meet a very narrow range of additional exclusions under state law.7 If Zimmerman had applied for a permit in one of the many states with stronger permit requirements, his history of violence and domestic abuse would likely have disqualified him from obtaining a concealed carry permit.
    [Show full text]
  • Implementation Considerations for Policies Permitting Guns on Campus in Kansas Paige S
    JUSTICE POLICY CENTE R Implementation Considerations for Policies Permitting Guns on Campus in Kansas Paige S. Thompson, Jahnavi Jagannath, Emily Reimal, and Sino Esthappan August 2019 In 2013, Kansas became the 11th state to enact a law allowing faculty, staff, and students to carry concealed firearms in campus buildings at public higher education institutions. Termed “campus carry” policies, these laws may explicitly allow guns on college campuses, or they may permit them implicitly by remaining silent on the matter or repealing an existing prohibition. Before this type of legislation was enacted in the United States, only law enforcement and security officials were permitted to carry firearms at public higher education institutions. This brief is one of two resulting from the Urban Institute’s research on a law in Kansas allowing eligible people to carry concealed firearms at public higher education institutions. It explores public university officials’ perceptions of laws allowing guns on campus and offers recommendations to consider during the planning and implementation process associated with similar laws. In 2003, Colorado became the first state to enact a law permitting concealed firearms to be carried on campus. Known as the Concealed Carry Act, the law declares that a concealed carry permit is valid “throughout the state,” with no specific exemption for public higher education institutions.1 In 2004, the Utah Supreme Court ruled that higher education institutions could not ban firearms, making Utah the first state to permit
    [Show full text]
  • Brief in Opposition ______Clare E
    No. 20-1639 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States _________ GEORGE K. YOUNG, JR., Petitioner, v. STATE OF HAWAII, ET AL., Respondents. _________ On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit _________ BRIEF IN OPPOSITION _________ CLARE E. CONNORS NEAL KUMAR KATYAL Attorney General Counsel of Record KIMBERLY T. GUIDRY MITCHELL P. REICH Solicitor General ERIN R. CHAPMAN ROBERT T. NAKATSUJI HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP KALIKO‘ONALANI D. 555 Thirteenth St., N.W. FERNANDES Washington, D.C. 20004 Deputy Solicitors (202) 637-5600 General [email protected] STATE OF HAWAII Counsel for Respondents DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 425 Queen Street Honolulu, HI 96813 Counsel for State of Hawaii Respondents (additional counsel listed on inside cover) ELIZABETH A. STRANCE Corporation Counsel LAUREEN L. MARTIN Assistant Corporation Counsel D. KAENA HOROWITZ Deputy Corporation Counsel COUNTY OF HAWAII 101 Aupuni Street Suite 325 Hilo, HI 96720 Counsel for County of Hawaii Respondents QUESTION PRESENTED Whether Hawaii’s restrictions on the open carrying of small, concealable arms in public are facially un- constitutional. (i) ii PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDING George K. Young, Jr., petitioner on review, was the plaintiff-appellant and cross-appellee below. The State of Hawaii; David Y. Ige, in his capacity as Governor of the State of Hawaii; and Clare E. Connors, Esq., in her capacity as State Attorney General (col- lectively, “Hawaii respondents”); the County of Ha- waii, a sub-agency of the State of Hawaii; Mitch Roth, in his capacity as Mayor of the County of Hawaii; Hilo County Police Department, as a sub-agency of the County of Hawaii; and Paul Ferreira, in his capacity as Chief of Police (collectively, “County of Hawaii Re- spondents”); and John Does, 1-25; Jane Does, 1-25; Doe Corporations, 1-5; and Doe Entities, 1-5, are re- spondents on review.
    [Show full text]
  • Journey to Gunland
    PUBLIC HEALTH JOURNEY TO GUNLAND 54 Scientific American, October 2017 JOURNEY TO More firearms do not keep people safe, hard numbers show. Why do so many Americans believe the opposite? By Melinda Wenner Moyer GUNLAND Photographs by Ben Rollins October 2017, ScientificAmerican.com 55 AFTER I PULLED THE TRIGGER Writer Melinda Wenner Moyer won an Award for AND RECOVERED FROM THE Excellence in Health Care Journalism for her December 2016 Scientific American article “The Looming Threat RECOIL, I SLOWLY REFOCUSED of Factory-Farm Superbugs.” MY EYES ON THE TARGET. THERE IT WAS—A TINY BUT DISTINCT 1 CIRCLE NEXT TO THE ZOMBIE’S EYE, THE FIRST BULLET HOLE I’D EVER MADE. I LOOKED DOWN AT THE SHAKING GLOCK 19 IN MY HANDS. A SWIFT AND STRONG EMOTIONAL TRANSFORMATION SWEPT OVER ME. IN SECONDS, I WENT FROM FEELING NERVOUS, EVEN TERRIFIED, TO EXHILARATED AND UNASSAILABLE— A N D RIGHT THEN I UNDERSTOOD WHY MILLIONS OF AMERICANS GUN CITY: Kennesaw, Ga., near Atlanta, has a law requiring citizens to own firearms (1 ). At the Governors Gun Club outside BELIEVE GUNS KEEP THEM SAFE. town, people practice shooting targets (2 ). I was standing in a shooting range 15 miles south of Ken- running for president, said of the 2015 shooting massacre in San nesaw, Ga., a place known as “America’s Gun City” because of a Bernardino, Calif., that “if we had guns in California on the other law requiring residents to own firearms. It was day two of a side, where the bullets went in the different direction, you four-day road trip I’d embarked on to investigate a controver- wouldn’t have 14 or 15 people dead right now.” Mike Watkins, a sial and popular claim made by the gun lobby: that more guns cop–turned–firearm instructor at the Kennesaw range, put it this protect more people from crime.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey Research and Self-Defense Gun Use: an Explanation of Extreme Overestimates David Hemenway
    Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 87 Article 5 Issue 4 Summer Summer 1997 Survey Research and Self-Defense Gun Use: An Explanation of Extreme Overestimates David Hemenway Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminology Commons, and the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons Recommended Citation David Hemenway, Survey Research and Self-Defense Gun Use: An Explanation of Extreme Overestimates, 87 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 1430 (1996-1997) This Criminology is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology by an authorized editor of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. 0091-4169/97/8704-1430 THEJOURNAL oF CRIMINAL LAw & CRIMINOLOGY Vol. 87, No. 4 Copyright © 1997 by Northwestern University, School of Law Printed in USA. POLICY AND PERSPECTIVES Editor's note: In Fall 1995, theJournalpublished an articleby Professors Gary Kleck and Marc Gertz, Armed Resistance to Crime: The Prevalence and Nature of Self-Defense with a Gun, 86J. CGlM. & CRIMINOLOGY 150 (1995). As part of its Policy and Perspectives section, the Journalnow publishes the views of ProfessorDavid Hemenway on the Kleck-Gertz paper, a reply by Professors Kleck and Gertz, and the views of Professor Tom Smith on both the Hemenway and Kleck-Gertz papers. As always, the views expressed here are those of the authors. SURVEY RESEARCH AND SELF-DEFENSE GUN USE: AN EXPLANATION OF EXTREME OVERESTIMATES DAVID I{EMENWAY* I. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY Gary Kleck and Marc Gertz conducted a survey of civilian defen- sive gun use in 1992.
    [Show full text]
  • “Gun Control” Vs. “Self- Protection”: a Case Against the Ideological Divide
    “Gun Control” vs. “Self- Protection”: A Case against the Ideological Divide James M. La Valle1 Justice Policy Journal Volume 10, Number 1 (Spring) © Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice 2013 www.cjcj.org/jpj Abstract A recent string of vicious, senseless and tragic mass spree killings have propelled an intense re-appraisal of U.S. gun laws, but the ensuing dialogue amply demonstrates that the opposing sides of the gun policy debate are as firmly entrenched in their mutual opposition to one another as ever before (Washington, 2012). Those who favor stricter “gun control” axiomatically oppose “personal protection” (e.g., “right to carry”) strategies, whereas those who favor “personal protection” measures stridently oppose “gun control”. The present study compares statistically (N=1736) these two contrasting approaches according to the methodological recommendations published by a National Academy of Sciences Research Panel (Wellford, Pepper & Petrie, 2005), and the results provisionally suggest that “personal protection” (“right to carry”; henceforth “RTC”) laws may reduce both gun homicide rates and total homicide rates, whereas traditional “gun control” policies do not detectably effect either outcome. However, the present study also observes that neither type of measure was originally designed to protect the public against the presently emerging and more deadly threat posed by armed and mentally 1 Coker College, Hartsville, SC, USA. Corresponding Author: James La Valle, Assistant Professor of Criminology, Coker College, Hartsville, SC, USA. Email: [email protected]. La Valle Justice Policy Journal, Spring 2013 disturbed mass spree killers. Suggestions for the modification of existing gun measures to more effectively prevent future mass spree-killings are offered.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington DC Shall Issue Must Inform Officer Immediately: YES (See Must Inform Section) DC CCW Links
    Washington DC Shall Issue Must Inform Officer Immediately: YES (See Must Inform Section) DC CCW Links DC CCW Site CCW Application Application Instructions Renew Online Transporting Firearms (From MPD) Mace/Stun Gun Info (From MPD) Firearm Laws Title 22 Subtitle VI Chapter 45 DC Certified Instructors DC Code DC Admin Rules Firearms Registration Title Note: Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, 7 Subtitle J Chpt 25 Maine, Montana, Mississippi, Missouri, New Hampshire, Oklahoma, Firearms Registration South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, West Virginia and DC Attorney General Wyoming have "Permitless Carry". Anyone who can legally possess a firearm may carry in these states without a Permit/License. Check each Age to Carry a Firearm states page for information on age and other restrictions that may apply. In Other States North Dakota has “Permitless Carry” for Residents only. Last Updated: 9/1/2021 Permits/Licenses This State Honors Listed Below DC does not honor any other states permit/license. Note: DC has moved its Laws to LexisNexis and there are no direct links to any of their laws. How to Apply for a Permit – Registration of All Firearms The DC Metro Police have posted Instructions on How to Apply and an Application that can be printed. The How to Apply document is very wordy but you need to read all of it before applying. Training can be delayed and you can be preapproved without the training if you obtain it within 45 days of preapproval. Cost for the License is $75.00. Payment Information and Fees for MPD Services can be viewed Here.
    [Show full text]
  • Gun Control: Concealed Carry Legislation in the 115Th Congress
    CRS INSIGHT Gun Control: Concealed Carry Legislation in the 115th Congress January 30, 2018 (IN10852) | Related Author William J. Krouse | William J. Krouse, Specialist in Domestic Security and Crime Policy ([email protected], 7-2225) On December 6, 2017, the House of Representatives passed the Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2017 (H.R. 38). The term "concealed carry" is commonly used to refer to state laws that allow an individual to carry a weapon—generally a handgun—on one's person in a concealed manner for the purposes of self-defense in public (outside one's home or fixed place of business). Federal law allows certain active-duty and retired law enforcement officers to carry concealed firearms interstate, irrespective of some state laws, but they must first be qualified and credentialed by their agencies of employment or from which they retired. For the most part, however, firearms carriage is a matter principally regulated by state law. Typically, there are two basic types of concealed carry laws: (1) "shall issue," meaning permits are generally issued to all eligible applicants; and (2) "may issue," which are more restrictive, meaning authorities enjoy a greater degree of discretion whether to issue permits to individuals. In 1987, concealed carry was generally prohibited in 16 states, the District of Columbia, and three U.S. territories. Twenty-six states and two territories had "may issue" laws, and seven had "shall issue" laws. One state—Vermont—allowed "permitless" carry, meaning otherwise firearms-eligible individuals could carry without a permit. Over the past 31 years, state laws have shifted from prohibitive "no issue" or restrictive "may issue" laws to more permissive "shall issue," or more recently, "permitless" laws (see Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Case 3:19-Cv-01537-BEN-JLB Document 115 Filed 06/04/21 Pageid.10515 Page 1 of 94
    Case 3:19-cv-01537-BEN-JLB Document 115 Filed 06/04/21 PageID.10515 Page 1 of 94 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 JAMES MILLER, et al., Case No.: 19-cv-1537-BEN (JLB) 11 Plaintiffs, DECISION 12 v. 13 ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of 14 California, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 I. INTRODUCTION 18 Like the Swiss Army Knife, the popular AR-15 rifle is a perfect combination of 19 home defense weapon and homeland defense equipment. Good for both home and battle, 20 the AR-15 is the kind of versatile gun that lies at the intersection of the kinds of firearms 21 protected under District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008) and United States v 22 Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939). Yet, the State of California makes it a crime to have an AR- 23 15 type rifle. Therefore, this Court declares the California statutes to be unconstitutional. 24 Plaintiffs challenge a net of interlocking statutes which impose strict criminal 25 restrictions on firearms that fall under California’s complex definition of the ignominious 26 “assault weapon.” Hearings on a preliminary injunction were consolidated with a trial on 27 the merits pursuant to F.R.C.P. Rule 65(a)(2). Having considered the evidence, the Court 28 1 19-cv-1537-BEN (JLB) Case 3:19-cv-01537-BEN-JLB Document 115 Filed 06/04/21 PageID.10516 Page 2 of 94 1 issues these findings of fact and conclusions of law,1 finds for the Plaintiffs, and enters 2 Judgment accordingly.
    [Show full text]
  • Pennsylvania Concealed Carry Permit/License
    Pennsylvania Shall Issue Must Inform Officer Immediately: NO (See Must Inform Section) Pennsylvania CCW Links State CCW Site Berks Co CCW Pamphlet Title 18 Gun Laws Printable Application SP Firearms Information State FAQ Site State Statutes State Admin Rules State Reciprocity Info Updated May 2020 2nd St. Reciprocity Page Note: Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, State Attorney General Maine, Montana, Mississippi, Missouri, New Hampshire, Oklahoma, 2nd CCW Info Site South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, West Virginia and Department of State Wyoming have "Permitless Carry". Anyone who can legally possess a firearm may carry in these states without a Permit/License. Check each Age to Carry a Firearm In Other States states page for information on age and other restrictions that may apply. North Dakota has “Permitless Carry” for Residents only. Last Updated: 9/1/2021 Permits/Licenses This State Honors Listed Below Notice: Pennsylvania only honors permits from Residents of the states it honors. Must be 21 Years of Age to carry concealed in Pennsylvania. Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas Colorado Florida Georgia Idaho1 Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Michigan Mississippi Missouri Montana New Hampshire North Carolina North Dakota2 Ohio Oklahoma South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah3 West Virginia3 Wisconsin Wyoming Idaho1 – PA only honors the ID Enhanced Permit. North Dakota2 - PA only honors the ND Class 1 Permit. Utah3 & West Virginia3 – PA only honors the UT & WV Regular Permits. www.handgunlaw.us 1 Reciprocity/How This State Honors Other States Permit/Licenses Title 18 § 18-6109 Reciprocity. (k)(1) The Attorney General shall have the power and duty to enter into reciprocity agreements with other states providing for the mutual recognition of a license to carry a firearm issued by the Commonwealth and a license or permit to carry a firearm issued by the other state.
    [Show full text]
  • Brief in Opposition for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts ______
    No. 18-1272 In the Supreme Court of the United States _________________ MICHAEL GOULD, ET AL., Petitioners, v. ANDREW LIPSON, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ACTING CHIEF OF THE BROOKLINE POLICE DEPARTMENT, ET AL., Respondents. _______________ ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT _______________ BRIEF IN OPPOSITION FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS _______________ MAURA HEALEY Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Elizabeth N. Dewar State Solicitor Timothy J. Casey* David C. Kravitz Assistant Attorneys General One Ashburton Place Boston, Massachusetts 02108 [email protected] (617) 963-2043 *Counsel of Record i QUESTION PRESENTED Whether granting petitioners licenses to carry firearms in public for particular purposes such as hunting, target shooting, or employment, but not granting them unrestricted licenses because they did not present a specific “good reason to fear injury,” violates their rights under the Second Amendment. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page QUESTION PRESENTED ....................................... i TABLE OF AUTHORITIES.................................... iii INTRODUCTION ..................................................... 1 STATEMENT ........................................................... 2 REASONS FOR DENYING THE PETITION ....... 11 I. Petitioners’ Claim of an Entrenched Split Is Overstated. ............................................ 11 II. The First Circuit’s Decision Is Correct. .... 17 A. The History of Massachusetts’s Longstanding Public-Carry Law Demonstrates That It Is Consistent with the Second Amendment. ............ 17 B. The Licensing Regime Also Satisfies Intermediate Scrutiny. ....................... 22 CONCLUSION ....................................................... 30 iii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page Cases Allen v. United States, 164 U.S. 492 (1896) ..................................... 21 Beard v. United States, 158 U.S. 550 (1895) ..................................... 21 Board of Trustees of State Univ. of N.Y. v. Fox, 492 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • IACLEA Blueprint for Safer Campuses
    Overview of the Virginia Tech Tragedy and Implications for Campus Safety The IACLEA Blueprint for Safer Campuses IACLEA Special Review Task Force April 18, 2008 SUMMARY This document is a synthesis of the reports written following the tragedy at Virginia Tech and related recommendations for campus safety by the International Association of Campus Law Enforcement Administrators AUTHORS Raymond H. Thrower, Convener and President, International Association of Campus Law Enforcement Administrators (IACLEA), Gustavus Adolphus College Steven J. Healy, Immediate Past President, IACLEA, Princeton University Dr. Gary J. Margolis, Past General Chair, IACP University & College Police Section, University of Vermont Michael Lynch, George Mason University Dolores Stafford, Past President, IACLEA, The George Washington University William Taylor, Chair, IACLEA Government Relations Committee, Past General Chair, IACP University & College Police Sector, Rice University IACLEA Analysis of the Virginia Tech Tragedy Table of Contents Introduction ..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................3 IACLEA’s Key Recommendations ............................................................................................................................................................5 Emergency Planning and Critical Incident Response .........................................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]