Finance 100 Problem Set Options

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Finance 100 Problem Set Options Finance 100 Problem Set Options 1. The Wall Street Journal reported the following prices for 3Com options for trading on Friday, February 7 1997. The stock itself closed at $50.75. Calls (Prices in $) Strike February March April July 45 6.625 7.5 8 10.5 50 2.8125 4.75 5.875 55 1.0625 2.625 3.75 6 60 0.4375 1.3125 1.875 4.25 65 0.1875 0.625 1.25 70 0.0625 Puts (Prices in $) Strike February March April July 45 1 1.8125 2.625 4.25 50 2.375 4 5 55 5.375 7.625 8.125 8.75 60 9.75 10.875 12.5 65 15.5 16.5 16.75 70 20.75 1.a Construct a payo® diagram for buying a $50 April call option on 3Com and for buying a $50 April put option. Construct the diagrams for net payo®s, i. e. after deducting the option premium. 1 1.b Construct a payo® diagram for writing a $50 April call option on 3Com and for writing a $50 April put option. Construct the diagrams for net payo®s, i. e. after adding the option premium. 1.c Construct payo® diagrams for the following options, all maturing in February. Construct net payo® diagrams only, i. e. include the premium paid/received for the contracts. It may help to also construct a table for this, with possible stock prices ranging from $40 to $80 in $5 intervals: i Buy one share and buy a put with X=$50. ii Buy a put with X=$50 and write a call with X=$70. iii Buy a call with X=$70 and buy a put with X=$50. iv Buy a call with X=$50 and buy a put with X=$70. v Sell one share and buy a call with X=$70. vi Buy one call with X=$50 and another one with X=$70. Write (sell) 2 calls with X=$60. vii Buy one put with X=$50 and another one with X=$70. Write (sell) 2 puts with X=$60. 1.d If the risk free rate of interest (continuously compounded) is 5%, then does put-call parity hold for the April options with X=$50, X=$60 and X=$65 (calculations based on 71 days to maturity, 365 day year)? 1.e Examine portfolios (iii) and (iv) from part 1.c. Which one is more expensive? Use put-call parity to show that portfolio (iii) should always cost less than portfolio (iv). 2 1.f Examine portfolios (vi) and (vii) in part 1.c. Can you establish a similar relationship as in 1.e? 1.g Compare portfolios (i) and (v) from part 1.c. In what sense are they "hedged" positions? Compare (i) with buying and (v) with selling the share, without the respective option position. Which risk does the option remove in each case? Would you prefer portfolio (i) or portfolio (v) if you believe that the stock price will go up (down)? 1.h Compare portfolios (iii) and (vi) from part 1.c. Which one do you prefer if you believe that volatility will go up (down)? 1.i Repeat the analysis under 1.h for portfolios (iv) and (vii). 1.j Use put call parity to establish the value of the following portfolios (Maturity = April): 1. Buy a put with X=$60, sell a call with X=$60. 2. Buy a call with X=$65, sell a put with X=$65. 1.k Reconsider the April option with $45 strike price in the table above. Use the Black-Scholes formula to price it, using volatilities between 20% and 50% in 5% increments. Chart the option values you receive against volatility. What do you observe? 1.l Which volatility do you need in (11) above in order to obtain exactly the quoted price for the $45 April call? Determine this either with trial and error, or use one of the EXCEL functions (GOALSEEK or SOLVER). 3 2. A Swiss company purchased machine tools from a US engineering ¯rm. The delivery date is in March (40 days from now), and the purchase price of the machine tools is SFR 5million. The US company is concerned about exchange rate movements between now and the delivery date and considers hedging its exposure. The futures price for March is $0.7021 USD/SFR. One futures contract is for SFR 125,000. The company could also use options. The following table gives the option prices on Swiss Francs: Strike Price Call premium Put premium ($US/SFR) (cents/SFR) (cents/SFR) 0.695 1.13 1.07 0.700 1.05 0.710 1.96 0.720 0.34 0.740 4.42 0.770 7.29 0.790 0.01 Option contracts are per SFR 62,500. Hence, the table reads as follows: If you buy one put option contract on Swiss Francs for March with a strike price of $0.71 today, you will have a right to sell SFR 62,500 at a price of 71 cents per SFR in March. Today you have to pay 1.96 cents per SFR you sell, i. e. the price of the contract is $0.0196*62,500=$1,225 today. 2.a Construct the optimal hedge using the futures contract described above. How many contracts does the US company have to buy/sell in order to hedge the exchange rate risk? 2.b Demonstrate that this hedge is perfect by looking at scenarios where the SFR is $0.65, $0.70 and $0.75. 2.c Construct a hedge using options. Compare alternative hedges, using at least 3 alternative strike prices. What type of contract do you buy/sell, and how 4 many? Compare against hedges for alternative scenarios for the exchange rate in March as in (2). Which option would you choose? 2.d Discuss the advantages and the disadvantages of a futures hedge you con- structed in 1.a versus the best option hedge you determined in 1.c, depending on alternative scenarios for the exchange rate. Which one would you choose? 2.e Suppose the US company has obtained an \exit clause" in the contract for the machine tools. This would allow the company not to sell to the Swiss buyer if the Swiss Franc fell below $0.695. They have determined that they make zero pro¯ts on the transactions if the receive $0.695 for each Swiss Franc, hence this is their break-even point (an example could be a price bid by a potential US buyer). Suppose that upon completion of the contract in March, the Swiss Franc falls to $0.69 and the exit clause comes in, and assume also that the company has used a perfect hedge using futures. The CEO argues: \We should complete the contract as agreed. The fall in the Swiss Franc does not concern us, since we are hedged in the futures market." The treasurer has a di®erent view: \We should use the clause in the contract and not sell to the Swiss buyer. We can take the pro¯ts from the hedge anyway." Who is right? 2.f When the company negotiated the exit clause discussed in (e), they had to pay a fee for the opportunity to opt out of the contract in the form of a collateral payment which they have to make today. This payment is due in addition to the price for the machine tools of SFR 5 million that is due in March. Hence this payment is like a fee the seller pays to the buyer, regardless of whether the contract is completed or not. What is the maximum fee the US company would be willing to pay for obtaining the exit clause in the contract? 3. European call and put options on Exxon are selling for $3.10 and $0.40 respectively. Both options are struck at $45 and have one month to maturity. 5 The current stock price is $46.60 and the one-month riskless rate is 5% p.a. Is there an arbitrage opportunity in this market? If so, demonstrate how to exploit it. 6.
Recommended publications
  • Up to EUR 3,500,000.00 7% Fixed Rate Bonds Due 6 April 2026 ISIN
    Up to EUR 3,500,000.00 7% Fixed Rate Bonds due 6 April 2026 ISIN IT0005440976 Terms and Conditions Executed by EPizza S.p.A. 4126-6190-7500.7 This Terms and Conditions are dated 6 April 2021. EPizza S.p.A., a company limited by shares incorporated in Italy as a società per azioni, whose registered office is at Piazza Castello n. 19, 20123 Milan, Italy, enrolled with the companies’ register of Milan-Monza-Brianza- Lodi under No. and fiscal code No. 08950850969, VAT No. 08950850969 (the “Issuer”). *** The issue of up to EUR 3,500,000.00 (three million and five hundred thousand /00) 7% (seven per cent.) fixed rate bonds due 6 April 2026 (the “Bonds”) was authorised by the Board of Directors of the Issuer, by exercising the powers conferred to it by the Articles (as defined below), through a resolution passed on 26 March 2021. The Bonds shall be issued and held subject to and with the benefit of the provisions of this Terms and Conditions. All such provisions shall be binding on the Issuer, the Bondholders (and their successors in title) and all Persons claiming through or under them and shall endure for the benefit of the Bondholders (and their successors in title). The Bondholders (and their successors in title) are deemed to have notice of all the provisions of this Terms and Conditions and the Articles. Copies of each of the Articles and this Terms and Conditions are available for inspection during normal business hours at the registered office for the time being of the Issuer being, as at the date of this Terms and Conditions, at Piazza Castello n.
    [Show full text]
  • Finance: a Quantitative Introduction Chapter 9 Real Options Analysis
    Investment opportunities as options The option to defer More real options Some extensions Finance: A Quantitative Introduction Chapter 9 Real Options Analysis Nico van der Wijst 1 Finance: A Quantitative Introduction c Cambridge University Press Investment opportunities as options The option to defer More real options Some extensions 1 Investment opportunities as options 2 The option to defer 3 More real options 4 Some extensions 2 Finance: A Quantitative Introduction c Cambridge University Press Investment opportunities as options Option analogy The option to defer Sources of option value More real options Limitations of option analogy Some extensions The essential economic characteristic of options is: the flexibility to exercise or not possibility to choose best alternative walk away from bad outcomes Stocks and bonds are passively held, no flexibility Investments in real assets also have flexibility, projects can be: delayed or speeded up made bigger or smaller abandoned early or extended beyond original life-time, etc. 3 Finance: A Quantitative Introduction c Cambridge University Press Investment opportunities as options Option analogy The option to defer Sources of option value More real options Limitations of option analogy Some extensions Real Options Analysis Studies and values this flexibility Real options are options where underlying value is a real asset not a financial asset as stock, bond, currency Flexibility in real investments means: changing cash flows along the way: profiting from opportunities, cutting off losses Discounted
    [Show full text]
  • Show Me the Money: Option Moneyness Concentration and Future Stock Returns Kelley Bergsma Assistant Professor of Finance Ohio Un
    Show Me the Money: Option Moneyness Concentration and Future Stock Returns Kelley Bergsma Assistant Professor of Finance Ohio University Vivien Csapi Assistant Professor of Finance University of Pecs Dean Diavatopoulos* Assistant Professor of Finance Seattle University Andy Fodor Professor of Finance Ohio University Keywords: option moneyness, implied volatility, open interest, stock returns JEL Classifications: G11, G12, G13 *Communications Author Address: Albers School of Business and Economics Department of Finance 901 12th Avenue Seattle, WA 98122 Phone: 206-265-1929 Email: [email protected] Show Me the Money: Option Moneyness Concentration and Future Stock Returns Abstract Informed traders often use options that are not in-the-money because these options offer higher potential gains for a smaller upfront cost. Since leverage is monotonically related to option moneyness (K/S), it follows that a higher concentration of trading in options of certain moneyness levels indicates more informed trading. Using a measure of stock-level dollar volume weighted average moneyness (AveMoney), we find that stock returns increase with AveMoney, suggesting more trading activity in options with higher leverage is a signal for future stock returns. The economic impact of AveMoney is strongest among stocks with high implied volatility, which reflects greater investor uncertainty and thus higher potential rewards for informed option traders. AveMoney also has greater predictive power as open interest increases. Our results hold at the portfolio level as well as cross-sectionally after controlling for liquidity and risk. When AveMoney is calculated with calls, a portfolio long high AveMoney stocks and short low AveMoney stocks yields a Fama-French five-factor alpha of 12% per year for all stocks and 33% per year using stocks with high implied volatility.
    [Show full text]
  • Straddles and Strangles to Help Manage Stock Events
    Webinar Presentation Using Straddles and Strangles to Help Manage Stock Events Presented by Trading Strategy Desk 1 Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC ("FBS"), Member NYSE, SIPC, 900 Salem Street, Smithfield, RI 02917 690099.3.0 Disclosures Options’ trading entails significant risk and is not appropriate for all investors. Certain complex options strategies carry additional risk. Before trading options, please read Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options, and call 800-544- 5115 to be approved for options trading. Supporting documentation for any claims, if applicable, will be furnished upon request. Examples in this presentation do not include transaction costs (commissions, margin interest, fees) or tax implications, but they should be considered prior to entering into any transactions. The information in this presentation, including examples using actual securities and price data, is strictly for illustrative and educational purposes only and is not to be construed as an endorsement, or recommendation. 2 Disclosures (cont.) Greeks are mathematical calculations used to determine the effect of various factors on options. Active Trader Pro PlatformsSM is available to customers trading 36 times or more in a rolling 12-month period; customers who trade 120 times or more have access to Recognia anticipated events and Elliott Wave analysis. Technical analysis focuses on market action — specifically, volume and price. Technical analysis is only one approach to analyzing stocks. When considering which stocks to buy or sell, you should use the approach that you're most comfortable with. As with all your investments, you must make your own determination as to whether an investment in any particular security or securities is right for you based on your investment objectives, risk tolerance, and financial situation.
    [Show full text]
  • Derivative Securities
    2. DERIVATIVE SECURITIES Objectives: After reading this chapter, you will 1. Understand the reason for trading options. 2. Know the basic terminology of options. 2.1 Derivative Securities A derivative security is a financial instrument whose value depends upon the value of another asset. The main types of derivatives are futures, forwards, options, and swaps. An example of a derivative security is a convertible bond. Such a bond, at the discretion of the bondholder, may be converted into a fixed number of shares of the stock of the issuing corporation. The value of a convertible bond depends upon the value of the underlying stock, and thus, it is a derivative security. An investor would like to buy such a bond because he can make money if the stock market rises. The stock price, and hence the bond value, will rise. If the stock market falls, he can still make money by earning interest on the convertible bond. Another derivative security is a forward contract. Suppose you have decided to buy an ounce of gold for investment purposes. The price of gold for immediate delivery is, say, $345 an ounce. You would like to hold this gold for a year and then sell it at the prevailing rates. One possibility is to pay $345 to a seller and get immediate physical possession of the gold, hold it for a year, and then sell it. If the price of gold a year from now is $370 an ounce, you have clearly made a profit of $25. That is not the only way to invest in gold.
    [Show full text]
  • Inflation Derivatives: Introduction One of the Latest Developments in Derivatives Markets Are Inflation- Linked Derivatives, Or, Simply, Inflation Derivatives
    Inflation-indexed Derivatives Inflation derivatives: introduction One of the latest developments in derivatives markets are inflation- linked derivatives, or, simply, inflation derivatives. The first examples were introduced into the market in 2001. They arose out of the desire of investors for real, inflation-linked returns and hedging rather than nominal returns. Although index-linked bonds are available for those wishing to have such returns, as we’ve observed in other asset classes, inflation derivatives can be tailor- made to suit specific requirements. Volume growth has been rapid during 2003, as shown in Figure 9.4 for the European market. 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 Jul 01 Jul 02 Jul 03 Jan 02 Jan 03 Sep 01 Sep 02 Mar 02 Mar 03 Nov 01 Nov 02 May 01 May 02 May 03 Figure 9.4 Inflation derivatives volumes, 2001-2003 Source: ICAP The UK market, which features a well-developed index-linked cash market, has seen the largest volume of business in inflation derivatives. They have been used by market-makers to hedge inflation-indexed bonds, as well as by corporates who wish to match future liabilities. For instance, the retail company Boots plc added to its portfolio of inflation-linked bonds when it wished to better match its future liabilities in employees’ salaries, which were assumed to rise with inflation. Hence, it entered into a series of 1 Inflation-indexed Derivatives inflation derivatives with Barclays Capital, in which it received a floating-rate, inflation-linked interest rate and paid nominal fixed- rate interest rate. The swaps ranged in maturity from 18 to 28 years, with a total notional amount of £300 million.
    [Show full text]
  • Empirical Properties of Straddle Returns
    EDHEC RISK AND ASSET MANAGEMENT RESEARCH CENTRE 393-400 promenade des Anglais 06202 Nice Cedex 3 Tel.: +33 (0)4 93 18 32 53 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.edhec-risk.com Empirical Properties of Straddle Returns December 2008 Felix Goltz Head of applied research, EDHEC Risk and Asset Management Research Centre Wan Ni Lai IAE, University of Aix Marseille III Abstract Recent studies find that a position in at-the-money (ATM) straddles consistently yields losses. This is interpreted as evidence for the non-redundancy of options and as a risk premium for volatility risk. This paper analyses this risk premium in more detail by i) assessing the statistical properties of ATM straddle returns, ii) linking these returns to exogenous factors and iii) analysing the role of straddles in a portfolio context. Our findings show that ATM straddle returns seem to follow a random walk and only a small percentage of their variation can be explained by exogenous factors. In addition, when we include the straddle in a portfolio of the underlying asset and a risk-free asset, the resulting optimal portfolio attributes substantial weight to the straddle position. However, the certainty equivalent gains with respect to the presence of a straddle in a portfolio are small and probably do not compensate for transaction costs. We also find that a high rebalancing frequency is crucial for generating significant negative returns and portfolio benefits. Therefore, from an investor's perspective, straddle trading does not seem to be an attractive way to capture the volatility risk premium. JEL Classification: G11 - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions, G12 - Asset Pricing, G13 - Contingent Pricing EDHEC is one of the top five business schools in France.
    [Show full text]
  • Classification ACCOUNTING for SWAPS, OPTIONS & FORWARDS
    ACCOUNTING FOR SWAPS, OPTIONS & FORWARDS AND ACCOUNTING FOR COMPLEX FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS - Anand Banka GET THE BASICS RIGHT!!! | What is a financial instrument? | Classification | Measurement | What is Equity? | What are the types of Hedges? | Decision vs. Accounting 1 DEFINITION: EQUITY | the instrument is an equity instrument if, and only if, both conditions (a) and (b) below are met. y The instrument includes no contractual obligation: | to deliver cash or another financial asset to another entity; or | to exchange financial assets or financial liabilities with another entity under conditions that are potentially unfavourable to the issuer DEFINITION: EQUITY …CONTD y If the instrument will or may be settled in the issuer’s own equity instruments, it is: | a non-derivative that includes no contractual obligation for the issuer to deliver a variable number of its own equity instruments; or | a derivative that will be settled only by the issuer exchanging a fixed amount of cash or another financial asset for a fixed number of its own equity instruments. For this purpose, rights, options or warrants to acquire a fixed number of the entity’s own equity instruments for a fixed amount of any currency are equity instruments if the entity offers the rights, options or warrants pro rata to all of its existing owners of the same class of its own non-derivative equity instruments. Apart from the aforesaid, the equity conversion option embedded in a convertible bond denominated in foreign currency to acquire a fixed number of the entity’s own equity instruments is an equity instrument if the exercise price is fixed in any currency.
    [Show full text]
  • Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
    www.pwc.com 2015 Derivative instruments and hedging activities www.pwc.com Derivative instruments and hedging activities 2013 Second edition, July 2015 Copyright © 2013-2015 PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership. All rights reserved. PwC refers to the United States member firm, and may sometimes refer to the PwC network. Each member firm is a separate legal entity. Please see www.pwc.com/structure for further details. This publication has been prepared for general information on matters of interest only, and does not constitute professional advice on facts and circumstances specific to any person or entity. You should not act upon the information contained in this publication without obtaining specific professional advice. No representation or warranty (express or implied) is given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this publication. The information contained in this material was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for purposes of avoiding penalties or sanctions imposed by any government or other regulatory body. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, its members, employees and agents shall not be responsible for any loss sustained by any person or entity who relies on this publication. The content of this publication is based on information available as of March 31, 2013. Accordingly, certain aspects of this publication may be superseded as new guidance or interpretations emerge. Financial statement preparers and other users of this publication are therefore cautioned to stay abreast of and carefully evaluate subsequent authoritative and interpretative guidance that is issued. This publication has been updated to reflect new and updated authoritative and interpretative guidance since the 2012 edition.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Pricing of Inflation-Indexed Caps
    On the Pricing of Inflation-Indexed Caps Susanne Kruse∗ ∗∗ ∗Hochschule der Sparkassen-Finanzgruppe { University of Applied Sciences { Bonn, Ger- many. ∗∗Fraunhofer Institute for Industrial and Financial Mathematics, Department of Finan- cial Mathematics, Kaiserslautern, Germany. Abstract We consider the problem of pricing inflation-linked caplets in a Black- Scholes-type framework as well as in the presence of stochastic volatility. By using results on the pricing of forward starting options in Heston's Model on stochastic volatility, we derive closed-form solutions for inflations caps which aim to receive smile-consistent option prices. Additionally we price options on the inflation de- velopment over a longer time horizon. In this paper we develop a new and more suitable formula for pricing inflation-linked options under the assumption of sto- chastic volatility. The formula in the presence of stochastic volatility allows to cover the smile effects observed in our Black-Scholes type environment, in which the exposure of year-on-year inflation caps to inflation volatility changes is ignored. The chosen diffusion processes reflect the macro-economic concept of Fisher ma- king a connection between interest rates on the market and the expected inflation rate. Key words: Inflation-indexed options, year-on-year inflation caps, Heston model, stochastic volatility, option pricing JEL Classification: G13 Mathematics Subject Classification (1991): 91B28, 91B70, 60G44, 60H30 1 1 Introduction The recent evolution on stock and bond markets has shown that neither stocks nor bonds inherit an effective protection against the loss of purchasing power. Decli- ning stock prices and a comparatively low interest rate level were and are not able to offer an effective compensation for the existing inflation rate.
    [Show full text]
  • Over-The-Counter Derivatives
    Overview Over-the-Counter Derivatives GuyLaine Charles, Charles Law PLLC Reproduced with permission. Published May 2020. Copyright © 2020 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. 800.372.1033. For further use, please visit: http://bna.com/copyright-permission-request/ Over-the-Counter Derivatives Contributed by GuyLaine Charles of Charles Law PLLC Over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives are financial products often maligned for being too complicated, opaque and risky. However, at their simplest form, OTC derivatives are quite straightforward and can be divided into three categories: forwards, options and swaps. Forwards A forward is a contract in which parties agree on the trade date, for the physical delivery of an agreed upon quantity of an underlying asset, for a specific price, at a future date. There are differing views as to when exactly forwards contracts first started being used, but it is accepted that forward contracts have been around for thousands of years. Throughout the years, forward contracts have allowed parties to protect themselves against the volatility of markets. For example, a manufacturer that requires sugar for the production of its goods may enter into a forward contract with a sugar supplier in which the manufacturer will agree that in three months the sugar supplier will provide the manufacturer with a specific quantity of sugar (X) in exchange for a specific amount of money (Y), all of which is negotiated today. Many factors can affect the price of sugar either positively or negatively – global supply, global demand, government subsidies etc., however, whether the price of sugar increases or decreases, the manufacturer knows that, unless its counterparty defaults, in three months it will be able to purchase X amount of sugar for $Y.
    [Show full text]
  • 13. Derivative Instruments. Forward. Futures. Options. Swaps
    13. Derivative Instruments. Forward. Futures. Options. Swaps 1.1 Primary assets and derivative assets Primary assets are sometimes real assets (gold, oil, metals, land, machinery) and financial assets (bills, bonds, stocks, deposits, currencies). Financial asset markets deal with treasury bills, bonds, stocks and other claims on real assets. The owner of a primary asset has a direct claim on the benefits provided by an asset. Financial markets deal with primary assets and derivative assets. Derivative assets are assets whose values depend on (or are derived from) some primary assets. Derivative assets (positions in forwards, futures, options and swaps) derive values from changes in real assets or financial assets, and actually even other indices, for example temperature index. Derivatives represent indirect claims on real or financial underlying assets. Types of derivatives: 1) forward and futures contracts 2) options 3) swaps 1.2 Forward and Futures 1.2.1 Forward Contract A forward contract obliges its purchaser to buy a given amount of a specified asset at some stated time in the future at the forward price. Similarly, the seller of the contract is obliged to deliver the asset at the forward price. Non-delivery forwards (NDF) are settled at maturity and no delivery of primary assets is assumed. Forward contracts are not traded on exchanges. They are over-the-counter (OTC) contracts. Forwards are privately negotiated between two parties and they are not liquid. Forward contracts are widely used in foreign exchange markets. The profit or loss from a forward contract depends on the difference between the forward price and the spot price of the asset on the day the forward contract matures.
    [Show full text]