DOCSLIB.ORG

Phage Integration and Chromosome Structure. a Personal History

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ANRV329-GE41-01 ARI 2 November 2007 12:22 by Annual Reviews on 12/13/07. For personal use only. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2007.41:1-11. Downloaded from arjournals.annualreviews.org ANRV329-GE41-01 ARI 2 November 2007 12:22 Phage Integration and Chromosome Structure. A Personal History Allan Campbell Department of Biological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-5020; email: [email protected] Annu. Rev. Genet. 2007. 41:1–11 Key Words First published online as a Review in Advance on lysogeny, transduction, conditional lethals, deletion mapping April 27, 2007 Abstract by Annual Reviews on 12/13/07. For personal use only. The Annual Review of Genetics is online at http://genet.annualreviews.org In 1962, I proposed a model for integration of λ prophage into the This article’s doi: bacterial chromosome. The model postulated two steps (i ) circular- 10.1146/annurev.genet.41.110306.130240 ization of the linear DNA molecule that had been injected into the Annu. Rev. Genet. 2007.41:1-11. Downloaded from arjournals.annualreviews.org Copyright c 2007 by Annual Reviews. cell from the phage particle; (ii ) reciprocal recombination between All rights reserved phage and bacterial DNA at specific sites on both partners. This 0066-4197/07/1201-0001$20.00 resulted in a cyclic permutation of gene order going from phage to prophage. This contrasted with integration models current at the time, which postulated that the prophage was not inserted into the continuity of the chromosome but rather laterally attached or synapsed with it. This chapter summarizes some of the steps leading up to the model including especially the genetic characterization of specialized transducing phages (λgal ) by recombinational rescue of conditionally lethal mutations. The serendipitous discovery of the conditional lethals is also described. 1 ANRV329-GE41-01 ARI 2 November 2007 12:22 PRELUDE what I was getting into. I had no special incli- This chapter covers part of my career around nation for research. I liked learning and en- joyed being a student and taking classes. I’ve gal: a cluster of 1960 and the questions that occupied my at- genes whose tention at that time. A brief summary of my read many accounts from scientists (including products are needed previous life indicates where I was coming some of my friends) who were motivated by to metabolize the from. At the end, I’ll say something about the ambition for research success from an early sugar galactose subsequent 40 years. age. Others of us just stumbled into research In high school I was inclined toward cre- careers. ative writing, but I thought a career in science My favorite professors at Berkeley had all should provide more secure employment. It been research-oriented, but that was not what was a fortunate decision, because I realized in had drawn me to them. I cared very little about retrospect that I have virtually no talent for how much they had accomplished. What I effective original writing. My best subject in liked was that they seemed to have thought school was mathematics. As a potential scien- deeply about the basic issues in their fields. It tist, I suffered from an inability to do much took me much longer to appreciate fully the of anything right in the laboratory. But I also linkage between depth of understanding and felt that experimental science kept me in touch hands-on involvement in research. with reality, whereas mathematics invited me In Urbana the Spiegelman lab was next to to dwell within a dream world of abstractions. the Luria lab. Salva’s interests were turning So in 1946 I enrolled as a chemistry major toward temperate phages, and Joe Bertani, at the University of California. My basic atti- then a research associate in Salva’s lab, was tudes toward scientific thinking were strongly performing many of the pioneering experi- shaped by the Berkeley chemists. Probably ments on lysogeny. I finished my thesis with my favorite professor was William Giauque, Sol in 1953, then started my first academic ap- who won a Nobel Prize for low temperature pointment as Instructor in Bacteriology at the chemistry during my senior year. I had never University of Michigan Medical School (an encountered anyone so completely immersed appointment interrupted almost immediately in science. He seemed a worthy role model by two years of military service). At Michigan, (and not because of his Nobel). Outside of I started out working on yeast (a continua- the Chemistry Department, my imagination tion of my doctoral research), but spent the was stimulated by the biochemically oriented summer of 1956 with Joe Bertani in Pasadena by Annual Reviews on 12/13/07. For personal use only. microbiologists—especially Mike Doudoroff (where he had moved to the Cal Tech phage and Roger Stanier. Inspired by them, I de- group). I arrived with a plan for some ex- cided in my senior year to apply to grad- periments on restriction/modification (which uate school in microbiology. Roger recom- produced some very preliminary results), but Annu. Rev. Genet. 2007.41:1-11. Downloaded from arjournals.annualreviews.org mended several places, and also directed then became engrossed with specialized trans- me toward C.B. van Niel’s course at the duction of the gal operon by phage λ. Hopkins Marine Station that summer (1950). van Niel became a second role model. I then became a graduate student of Sol Spiegelman’s SPECIALIZED TRANSDUCTION at the University of Illinois. Before I arrived, At that time, Jean Weigle had joined the Cal I.C. Gunsalus and Salva Luria had been re- Tech phage group, but spent his summers cruited to Illinois, which then arguably had in Geneva (where he held a professorship the best bacteriology department in the world in physics). When I arrived in Pasadena for (at least for basic, nonmedical bacteriology.) the summer, he had left behind some pre- Graduate school application was much less liminary notes that Joe thought I might fol- organized than now, and I had little idea of low up on. Specialized transduction had been 2 Campbell ANRV329-GE41-01 ARI 2 November 2007 12:22 discovered by Larry Morse (16), but Jean tle fiefdoms. The tradition of arts colleges wanted to look into it further (19). I was un- comes from clerical institutions, which of aware at the time that he had also encouraged course had their own discipline but adapted SOS mutagenesis: Werner Arber in Geneva to investigate the more readily to a democratic structure. induction of same system. Eventually, Werner and I came, I was not offered any position in arts mutations by action quite independently, to very similar conclu- colleges at that time, but Miloslav De- of the products of sions. Two such parallel studies are about the merec, Director of the Carnegie Institu- some of the bacterial right number to provide corroboration but tion Department of Genetics at Cold Spring genes inducible by DNA damage avoid needless duplication. Harbor, wanted a one-year appointment to On returning to Michigan, I postponed replace George Streisinger, who was spend- further work on yeast (for 50 years now) and ing the year abroad. Cold Spring Harbor dedicated myself full time to the study of spe- was a marvelous place to do research, cialized transduction. I had a small NIH grant free from other obligations, and the senior to support the yeast work, so I informed NIH people—Demerec, Barbara McClintock and in my annual renewal that I was now work- Al Hershey—provided inspiration and moral ing mainly on phage. I am eternally grateful support. to have started my career at a time when such The initial task I set myself that year was flexibility was routine. to find out more precisely which segment of My initial work, paralleled by that of Arber the λ genome was missing from λgal. I knew (3), examined the effect of multiplicity of that the h gene was gone and that some other infection on the frequency and nature of genes were present. Dale Kaiser had made a the transductants (5)—something that nei- good map of λ, but the number of available ther Morse nor Weigle had done. The re- genetic markers was very limited. So I decided sults indicated that transduction was carried to make more. out by chimeric phages that had lost some of Jean Weigle had discovered that, if both their own genes while acquiring the nearby λ and Escherichia coli are exposed separately gal genes. The phage DNA that was miss- to UV light and then the λ is plated on the ing included the h gene, which was in the irradiated host, a substantial fraction of the middle of the phage genetic map. The find- observed plaques are mutant. The mecha- ing heightened my consciousness that most nism was unknown. One favored hypothesis previous students of lysogeny had treated the at the time was recombinational rescue from by Annual Reviews on 12/13/07. For personal use only. prophage as an indivisible unit (analogous to a postulated prophage homolog in the host, the concept of the gene that prevailed in the but it is now understood as inducible SOS first half of the twentieth century), whereas it mutagenesis arising during radiochemical re- might sometimes be more relevant to try trac- pair (9). My intention was to collect small Annu. Rev. Genet. 2007.41:1-11. Downloaded from arjournals.annualreviews.org ing the origins of the individual genes of the plaque mutants, map them by phage crosses, prophage. then see whether their wild-type alleles could Two years in the Michigan Medical School be rescued from λgal.
Recommended publications
  • A Viewpoint of Aspects of a History of Genetics: an Autobiography

    A Viewpoint of Aspects of a History of Genetics: an Autobiography

    12. The Postgraduate Medical School,London University. The Head of the Bacteriology Department at the PGMS(later the Royal PGMS) was Professor Lord(Trevor) Stamp who did'nt seem to bother what research I did so long as I did something. My closest colleague was Dr.Denny Mitchison(Lecturer),one of the three biologist sons of authoress Naomi Mitchison and nephew of J.B.S.Haldane,whose main interest was typing tubercle bacilli under MRC!auspices. In addition there were at least two non-tenured medical graduates on the staff. My only departmental responsibilities were to take my turn at clinical bacteriology which amounted to the mornings of one week in every three or four,and to share in teaching the bacteriology course for the Diploma in Clinical Pathology which occupied me for not more than a few weeks in the year. There was,in fact,a positive obligation to spend at least half one's time at research. I decided to return to the mechanism of somatic phase variation in S.enteritidis,but had begun to realise the potentiafities of genetic analysis inherent in the recent discovery by Lederberg and Tatum(1946) of conjugation in Escherichia coli ,and wondered if Salmonella also could conjugate. But it was clear that I should first become acquainted with the phenomenon in --E.coli. Towards the end of 1950 I went on a bacterial chemistry course at Cambridge,organized by Prof.E.H.Gale,and there met Luca Cavalli(later Cavalli-Sforza) who had worked with Joshua Lederberg on conjugation at Wisconsin and,being mainly interested in population genetics,was currently a visitor in Prof.R.A.Fisher's Department of Mathematics.
  • The Eighth Day of Creation”: Looking Back Across 40 Years to the Birth of Molecular Biology and the Roots of Modern Cell Biology

    The Eighth Day of Creation”: Looking Back Across 40 Years to the Birth of Molecular Biology and the Roots of Modern Cell Biology

    “The Eighth Day of Creation”: looking back across 40 years to the birth of molecular biology and the roots of modern cell biology Mark Peifer1 1 Department of Biology and Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB#3280, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3280, USA * To whom correspondence should be addressed Email: [email protected] Phone: (919) 962-2272 1 Forty years ago, Horace Judson’s “The Eight Day of Creation” was published, a book vividly recounting the foundations of modern biology, the molecular biology revolution. This book inspired many in my generation. The anniversary provides a chance for a new generation to take a look back, to see how science has changed and hasn’t changed. Many central players in the book, including Sydney Brenner, Seymour Benzer and Francois Jacob, would go on to be among the founders of modern cell, developmental, and neurobiology. These players come alive via their own words, as complex individuals, both heroes and anti-heroes. The technologies and experimental approaches they pioneered, ranging from cell fractionation to immunoprecipitation to structural biology, and the multidisciplinary approaches they took continue to power and inspire our work today. In the process, Judson brings out of the shadows the central roles played by women in many of the era’s discoveries. He provides us with a vision of how science and scientists have changed, of how many things about our endeavor never change, and how some new ideas are perhaps not as new as we’d like to think. 2 In 1979 Horace Judson completed a ten-year project about cell and molecular biology’s foundations, unveiling “The Eighth Day of Creation”, a book I view as one of the most masterful evocations of a scientific revolution (Judson, 1979).
  • Grete Kellenberger-Gujer: Molecular Biology Research Pioneer

    Grete Kellenberger-Gujer: Molecular Biology Research Pioneer

    Bacteriophage ISSN: (Print) 2159-7081 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/kbac20 Grete Kellenberger-Gujer: Molecular biology research pioneer Sandra Citi & Douglas E. Berg To cite this article: Sandra Citi & Douglas E. Berg (2016) Grete Kellenberger-Gujer: Molecular biology research pioneer, Bacteriophage, 6:2, 1-12, DOI: 10.1080/21597081.2016.1173168 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21597081.2016.1173168 © 2016 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC© Sandra Citi and Douglas E. Berg Accepted author version posted online: 05 Apr 2016. Published online: 05 Apr 2016. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 322 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=kbac20 Download by: [Université de Genève] Date: 26 September 2016, At: 06:05 BACTERIOPHAGE 2016, VOL. 6, NO. 2, e1173168 (12 pages) http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21597081.2016.1173168 LIFE IN SCIENCE Grete Kellenberger-Gujer: Molecular biology research pioneer Sandra Citia and Douglas E. Bergb aDepartment of Cell Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland; bDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Disease, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY Grete Kellenberger-Gujer was a Swiss molecular biologist who pioneered fundamental studies of Received 17 February 2016 bacteriophage in the mid-20th century at the University of Geneva.
  • Guest Commentary

    Guest Commentary

    JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY, Feb. 2004, p. 595–600 Vol. 186, No. 3 0021-9193/04/$08.00ϩ0 DOI: 10.1128/JB.186.3.595–600.2004 Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved. GUEST COMMENTARY Lysogeny at Mid-Twentieth Century: P1, P2, and Other Experimental Systems Giuseppe Bertani* Biology Division, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125 Most of us doing research have a preferred material, a set of Latin countries of Europe, immunology being the star of the well-tried techniques, a standing list of unsolved problems, day in medical quarters. Also, the debate only rarely focused ways of looking at or of doing things, which we share to a large on one type of experiment with well-defined and generally extent with colleagues in the same laboratory and others in the available material. In the early thirties a definition of lysogeny same area of specialization, be they friends, former associates, was reached (26) that is still valid, obviously without modern or competitors. All this and more is encompassed by the con- molecular implications. Anlage, a German word used in em- cept of “experimental system” as introduced and used by Hans- bryology, was applied by Burnet and McKie (27) to what we Jo¨rg Rheinberger (76, 77), a historian of science. His concept, now call prophage. The concept of Anlage or prophage was rather flexible and rich in metaphors, may be easily adapted to based on the fact that no one had succeeded, using a variety of the present narrative, which proceeds from a personal view methods, in demonstrating the presence of infectious phage rather than from a critical historical examination.
  • 6 Women Scientists Who Were Snubbed Due to Sexism Despite Enormous Progress in Recent Decades, Women Still Have to Deal with Biases Against Them in the Sciences

    6 Women Scientists Who Were Snubbed Due to Sexism Despite Enormous Progress in Recent Decades, Women Still Have to Deal with Biases Against Them in the Sciences

    6 Women Scientists Who Were Snubbed Due to Sexism Despite enormous progress in recent decades, women still have to deal with biases against them in the sciences. BY JANE J. LEE, NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC PUBLISHED MAY 19, 2013 In April, National Geographic News published a story about the letter in which scientist Francis Crick described DNA to his 12-year-old son. In 1962, Crick was awarded a Nobel Prize for discovering the structure of DNA, along with fellow scientists James Watson and Maurice Wilkins. Several people posted comments about our story that noted one name was missing from the Nobel roster: Rosalind Franklin, a British biophysicist who also studied DNA. Her data were critical to Crick and Watson's work. But it turns out that Franklin would not have been eligible for the prize—she had passed away four years before Watson, Crick, and Wilkins received the prize, and the Nobel is never awarded posthumously. But even if she had been alive, she may still have been overlooked. Like many women scientists, Franklin was robbed of recognition throughout her career (See her section below for details.) She was not the first woman to have endured indignities in the male- dominated world of science, but Franklin's case is especially egregious, said Ruth Lewin Sime, a retired chemistry professor at Sacramento City College who has written on women in science. Over the centuries, female researchers have had to work as "volunteer" faculty members, seen credit for significant discoveries they've made assigned to male colleagues, and been written out of textbooks.
  • Genetics Society of America

    Genetics Society of America

    Genetics Society of America 1991 Records, Proceedings and Reports Published as supplementary material in GENETICS, Volume 128 Prepared by The Secretary Thomas C. Kaufman Department of Biology Indiana University Bloomington, Indiana 47405 s2 BOARDS, COMMITTEES AND REPRESENTATIVES FOR 1991 BOARDOF DIRECTORS Leland H. Hartwell, President Nina V. Fedoroff John C. Lucchesi, Vice-president Barry S. Ganetzky Thomas C. Kaufman, Secretary Christine Guthrie Carol S. Newlon, Treasurer H. Robert Horvitz Robert L. Metzenberg, Past President Martha M. Howe John W. Drake, Editor John R. Roth GENETICSEDITORIAL BOARD John W. Drake, Editor Roger E. Ganschow Sally Lyman Alien Maureen R. Hanson Karen Artzt Robert K. Herman Douglas E. Berg Richard R. Hudson David Botstein Nancy A. Jenkins John E. Boynton Elizabeth Jones Anthony H. D. Brown Cathy C. Laurie Benjamin Burr Wen-Hsiung Li Marian Carlson Trudy F. C. Mackay Deborah Charlesworth Patricia J. Pukkila Peter Cherbas G. Shirleen Roeder Arthur Chovnick Trudi Schupbach Andrew G. Clark William F. Sheridan Thomas W. Cline Michael J. Simmons Rowland H. Davis Gerald R. Smith Robin E. Denell Steven D. Tanksley Norman R. Drinkwater Elizabeth Thompson Victoria G. Finnerty Michael Turelli Margaret T. Fuller Bruce S. Weir ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE Gerry Gurvitch, Executive Director Sharon Adler,Accounting Assistant Judy Ashton, Receptionist/Oflce Assistant Gloria Garber, MembershiplMeetings Assistant Karen Gould, Comptroller Sequietta Johnson,Publications Assistant Candis Kershner, Bookkeeping Assistant Margot Kiley, Membership Manager Krista Koziol, Publications Manager Anne Marie Langevin, GSA Meetings Manager Damita McVeigh, Membership Assistant Marsha Ryan, ASHG Meetings Manager Jane Salomon, ASHG Special Projects Manager Elaine Strass, Deputy Director COMMITTEES Executive Christine Guthrie Leland H.
  • The Roles of Moron Genes in the Escherichia Coli Enterobacteria Phage Phi-80

    The Roles of Moron Genes in the Escherichia Coli Enterobacteria Phage Phi-80

    THE ROLES OF MORON GENES IN THE ESCHERICHIA COLI ENTEROBACTERIA PHAGE PHI-80 Yury V. Ivanov A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY December 2012 Committee: Ray A. Larsen, Advisor Craig L. Zirbel Graduate Faculty Representative Vipa Phuntumart Scott O. Rogers George S. Bullerjahn © 2012 Yury Ivanov All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Ray Larsen, Advisor The TonB system couples cytoplasmic membrane-derived proton motive force energy to drive ferric siderophore transport across the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria. While much effort has focused on this process, how energy is harnessed to provide for transport of ligands remains unknown. Several bacterial viruses (“phage”) are known to require the TonB system to irreversibly adsorb (i.e., establish infection) in the model organism Escherichia coli. One such phage is φ80, a “cousin” of the model temperate phage λ. Determining how φ80 is using the TonB system for infection should provide novel insights to the mechanisms of TonB-dependent processes. It had long been known that recombination between λ and φ80 results in a λ-like phage for whom TonB is now required; and this recombination involved the λ J gene, which encodes the tail-spike protein required for irreversible adsorption of λ to E. coli. Thus, we suspected that a φ80 homologue of the λ J gene product was responsible for the TonB dependence of φ80. While φ80 has long served as a tool for assaying TonB activity, it has not received the scrutiny afforded λ.
  • WERNER ARBER Department of Microbiology, Biozentrum, University of Basel, Basel, Swit- Zerland

    WERNER ARBER Department of Microbiology, Biozentrum, University of Basel, Basel, Swit- Zerland

    PROMOTION AND LIMITATION OF GENETIC EXCHANGE Nobel Lecture, 8 December, 1978 by WERNER ARBER Department of Microbiology, Biozentrum, University of Basel, Basel, Swit- zerland Exchange of genetic material has widely been observed in practically all living organisms. This suggests that genetic exchange must have been practised since a long time ago, perhaps ever since life has existed. The rules followed by nature in the exchange of genetic information are studied by geneticists. However, as long as the chemical nature of the genetic material remained unknown, genetics remained a rather abstract branch of the biological sciences. This gradually began to change after Avery et al. (1944) had identified DNA as the carrier of genetic information. Their evidence found an independent support by Hershey and Chase (1952), and it was accepted by a majority of biologists by 1953 when Watson and Crick (1953) presented their structural model of DNA. Hence it was clear 25 years ago that very long, filamentous macromolecules of DNA contained the genes. As is usual in fundamental research, the knowledge acquired pointed to a number of new important questions. Among them were those on the structure and function of genes, but also those on the molecular mecha- nisms of exchange of genetic material. It is at that time, in the fall of 1953, that I joined more or less by chance a small group of investigators animated by Jean Weigle and Eduard Kellen- berg. One of their main interests concerned the mechanisms of genetic recombination. Feeling that the time was not ripe to carry out such studies on higher organisms, they had chosen to work with a bacterial virus, the nowadays famous bacteriophage lambda (A).
  • Genes and Men

    Genes and Men

    Genes and Men 50 Years of Research at the Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics Genes and Men 50 Years of Research at the Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics contents 4 Preface martin vingron 6 Molecular biology in Germany in the founding period of the Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics hans-jörg rheinberger 16 some questions to olaf pongs und volkmar braun 18 From the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute of Anthropology, Human Heredity and Eugenics to the Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics carola sachse 32 some questions to kenneth timmis und reinhard lührmann 34 Remembering Heinz Schuster and 30 years of the Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics karin moelling 48 some questions to regine kahmann und klaus bister 50 Ribosome research at the Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics in Berlin-Dahlem – The Wittmann era knud h. nierhaus 60 some questions to tomas pieler und albrecht bindereif 62 “ I couldn’t imagine anything better.” thomas a. trautner interviewed by ralf hahn 74 some questions to claus scheidereit und adam antebi 76 50 years of research at the Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics – The transition towards human genetics karl sperling 90 some questions to ann ehrenhofer-murray und andrea vortkamp 92 Genome sequencing and the pathway from gene sequences to personalized medicine russ hodge 106 some questions to edda klipp und ulrich stelzl 108 Transformation of biology to an information science jens g. reich 120 some questions to sylvia krobitsch und sascha sauer 122 Understanding the rules behind genes catarina pietschmann 134 some questions to ho-ryun chung und ulf ørom 136 Time line about the development of molecular biology and the Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics 140 Imprint preface research in molecular biology and genetics has undergone a tremen- dous development since the middle of the last century, marked in particular by the discovery of the structure of DNA by Watson and Crick and the interpretation of the genetic code by Holley, Khorana and Nirenberg.
  • Host Growth Rate Affects Bacteriophage Lambda Burst Size

    Host Growth Rate Affects Bacteriophage Lambda Burst Size

    Host Growth Rate Affects Bacteriophage Lambda Burst Size Aida Abbasiazam Submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Biology in the Graduate Division of Queens College of The City University of New York January 2020 Approved by: ________________________ (Sponsor) Date: _______________________________ 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract Acknowledgements Introduction................................................................................... 1 1.1 Bacteriophage Lambda Genome and Structure 1.2 Phage Life Cycle and Replication 1.3 Phage Burst Size Determination 1.4 Role of Nutrient Concentration on Phage Burst Size 1.5 The Effect of Growth Media on Host Cell and Concentration of Phages Objectives.......................................................................................14 Materials and Methods.................................................................15 Results............................................................................................ 19 Discussion ..................................................................................... 29 References...................................................................................... 33 2 ABSTRACT Life history traits such as growth rate and burst size involve the multiplication of phages in the host bacterial cell as a means of transmission and survival. As a consequence phage fitness depends on the physiological state of the host based on nutrient availability. In this study I tried to elucidate the effect of E. coli growth
  • An Interview with Werner Arber

    An Interview with Werner Arber

    Interview The Inventiveness of Nature: An Interview with Werner Arber Jane Gitschier* Departments of Medicine and Pediatrics and Institute for Human Genetics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America Image 1. Werner Arber stands outside the Biozentrum at the University of Basel, Switzerland. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004879.g001 I admit to having a soft spot for the years, restriction and modification was not spawned extremely useful technology. In bacterial phenomenon of host-specific only a remarkable story in itself, but also past issues, I have interviewed Hamilton modification and restriction. I vividly remember first learning about this mech- Citation: Gitschier J (2014) The Inventiveness of Nature: An Interview with Werner Arber. PLoS Genet 10(12): anism to stave off marauding DNA as a e1004879. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004879 beginning graduate student in the mid- Published December 18, 2014 1970s. Preceding the discovery of its Copyright: ß 2014 Jane Gitschier. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative modern-day defensive counterpart, Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced provided the original author and source are credited. short palindromic repeats) by about 50 * Email: [email protected] PLOS Genetics | www.plosgenetics.org 1 December 2014 | Volume 10 | Issue 12 | e1004879 Smith, who isolated the first type II Edouard Kellenberger, who ran the La- new preparation techniques. You could restriction enzyme, as well as Herb boratoire de Biophysique in the basement spread the lysate out on the film and see Boyer, whose production of recombinant of the Institute of Physics there.
  • Esther Lederberg, Pioneer in Genetics, Dies at 83

    Esther Lederberg, Pioneer in Genetics, Dies at 83

    Esther Lederberg, pioneer in genetics, dies at 83 Stanford Report, November 29, 2006 Esther Lederberg, pioneer in genetics, dies at 83 BY MITZI BAKER Courtesy of Matthew Simon • The Lederberg Plasmid Collection • Little Lambda, Who Made Thee? • Pioneer of microbial genetics: Joshua Lederberg Esther Lederberg gives a lecture in Japan in 1962. Esther Miriam Zimmer Lederberg, PhD, professor emeritus of microbiology and immunology, whose more than half-century of studies opened the door for some fundamental discoveries in microbial genetics, died Nov. 11 at Stanford Hospital of pneumonia and congestive heart failure. She was 83. A memorial service will be held at the Faculty Club on Nov. 30 from 4-6 p.m. "She was one of the great pioneers in bacterial genetics," said Stanley Falkow, PhD, the Robert W. and Vivian K. Cahill Professor in Cancer Research. "Experimentally and methodologically she was a genius in the lab." Lederberg is perhaps best known for her collaboration with her first husband, Joshua Lederberg, PhD, who in 1958 won the Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine for discoveries on how bacteria mate. But her work was extremely noteworthy in its own right, and she was a trailblazer for women scientists at Stanford and at large. "She was a real legend," said Lucy Tompkins, MD, PhD, the Lucy Becker Professor in Medicine and of Microbiology and Immunology. Among Lederberg's achievements was the discovery of lambda phage, a virus that infects E. coli bacteria. She published the first report of it in Microbial Genetics Bulletin in 1951, and it quickly became a significant and widely used tool for studying genetic recombination and gene regulation.