Dissertationes Biologicae Universitatis Tartuensis 131

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Dissertationes Biologicae Universitatis Tartuensis 131 DISSERTATIONES BIOLOGICAE UNIVERSITATIS TARTUENSIS 131 DISSERTATIONES BIOLOGICAE UNIVERSITATIS TARTUENSIS 131 DIVERSITY OF LICHEN SPECIES IN ESTONIA: INFLUENCE OF REGIONAL AND LOCAL FACTORS INGA JÜRIADO TARTU UNIVERSITY PRESS Department of Botany, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Estonia The dissertation is accepted for the commencement of the degree of Doctor philosophiae in botany and mycology at the University of Tartu on May 23, 2007 by the Council of the Faculty of Biology and Geography of the University of Tartu. Supervisors: Assoc. Prof. Tiina Randlane and Prof. Jaanus Paal Opponent: Prof. Dr. Christoph Scheidegger, Swiss Federal Research Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research, WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland Commencement: Room 218, Lai 40, Tartu, on September 12, 2007, at 10.15 The publication of this dissertation is granted by the Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu. ISSN 1024–6479 ISBN 978–9949–11–685–0 (trükis) ISBN 978–9949–11–686–7 (PDF) Autoriõigus Inga Jüriado, 2007 Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus www.tyk.ee Tellimus nr 290 CONTENTS LIST OF ORIGINAL PUBLICATIONS ....................................................... 6 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................... 7 1.1. General introduction .......................................................................... 7 1.2. The objectives of the thesis ............................................................... 9 2. MATERIAL AND METHODS ............................................................... 11 2.1. Study area .......................................................................................... 11 2.2. Study sites ......................................................................................... 12 2.3. Data collection .................................................................................. 13 2.3.1. Lichen sampling ...................................................................... 13 2.3.2. Environmental variables ......................................................... 14 2.4. Data processing ................................................................................. 16 3. RESULTS ................................................................................................ 17 3.1. Effect of area, number of biotopes and isolation on the diversity of lichen species on the islets (Paper I) ........................................... 17 3.2. Factors influencing the diversity of lichen species in forests ........... 19 3.2.1. Stand level (Papers II–III) ...................................................... 19 3.2.2. Tree level (Paper IV) .............................................................. 21 3.3. Distribution and habitat ecology of the forest lichen Lobaria pulmonaria (Paper V) ....................................................................... 23 4. DISCUSSION ........................................................................................... 25 4.1. Biogeographical determinants of the diversity of lichen species on the islets (Paper I) ....................................................................... 25 4.2. Factors influencing the diversity of lichen species in forests (Papers II–V)..................................................................................... 27 CONCLUSIONS ........................................................................................... 31 REFERENCES .............................................................................................. 32 SUMMARY IN ESTONIAN ........................................................................ 42 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .......................................................................... 45 PUBLICATIONS ........................................................................................... 47 5 2 LIST OF ORIGINAL PUBLICATIONS The thesis is based on the following publications which are referred to in the text by the Roman numerals: I. Jüriado, I., Suija, A. & Liira, J. 2006. Biogeographical determinants of lichen species diversity on islets in the West-Estonian Archipelago. Journal of Vegetation Science 17: 125–134. II. Jüriado, I., Liira, J. & Paal, J. 2003. Epiphytic and epixylic lichen species diversity in Estonian natural forests. Biodiversity and Conservation 12: 1587–1607. III. Meier, E., Paal, J., Liira, J. & Jüriado, I. 2005. Influence of tree stand age and management to the species diversity in Estonian eutrophic alvar and boreo-nemoral Pinus sylvestris forests. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 20: 135–144. IV. Jüriado, I., Liira, J., Paal, J. & Suija, A. Ecological conditions influencing the diversity of epiphytic lichens on temperate broad-leaved trees in Estonian floodplain forests. Manuscript submitted to Applied Vegetation Science. V. Jüriado, I. & Liira, J. Distribution, habitat ecology and conservation impli- cations of the epiphytic forest lichen Lobaria pulmonaria in Estonia. Manuscript submitted to Annales Botanici Fennici. Published papers are reproduced with due permission from the publishers. The author was primarily responsible for data collection and identification of lichens, for surveying and examining the literature, and for the writing of Papers I–II, IV and V. The author substantially contributed to analysing data in Papers I–II, IV and V. In Paper III, the author was responsible for the identification of lichens and participated in writing. 6 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. General introduction The patterns of species diversity are influenced by factors functioning at different levels of spatial and temporal scales (Ricklefs 1987; Loreau 2000). On a small scale the processes such as biotic interactions (e.g. competition, parasitism), small-scale disturbance, resource availability, and niche differen- tiation predominate in the formation of community structure and diversity (Mouquet et al. 2003; Cottnie & Meester 2004; Ricklefs 2004; He et al. 2005). Factors operating on a large scale cover a variety of ecological and evolutionary processes, historical events and geographical aspects (Ricklefs 1987; Zobel 1992, 1997; Ricklefs & Schluter 1993). The relative importance of local and regional factors in structuring local communities varies among different geographical regions and on the time scale (McCune 2000; Mouquet et al. 2003; Ricklefs 2004; Will-Wolf et al. 2006). The delimiting of scales and processes is difficult as factors acting on a multitude spatial and temporal scales are intercorrelated (Jesberger & Sheard 1973; McCune 1993; Loreau 2000; Ricklefs 2004; Giordani 2006). The main discriminates of diversity patterns are known to depend also on the taxonomical group of organisms (e.g. Nilsson et al. 1988; Ricklefs & Lovette 1999). Most studies deal with vascular plants and vertebrates (Ricklefs & Schluter 1993; Rosenzweig 1995), and less attention has been paid on cryptogams (bryophytes, fungi, algae) and other less conspicuous organism groups. Lichenized fungi (lichens) are symbiotic organisms consisting mainly of two components, fungi (the mycobiont) and algae or cyanobacteria (the photobiont), living in close symbiotic association (Nash 1996). Due to the poikilohydric nature of lichens, they are more dependent on the atmosphere, regarding their metabolic processes, than vascular plants. As the periods of the metabolic activity of lichens are determined mainly by the precipitation and conditions of evaporation, they are generally slow-growing organisms (Armstrong 1988; Nash 1996). Lichens do not have a cuticule which effectively protects the living cells of vascular plants from the free admission of solutions and gases to the living tissues; thus lichens are more sensitive to the chemical content of the atmosphere than terrestrial vascular plants (Gries 1996). Nevertheless, as lichens have no roots and are much smaller in size than most plants, they have an advantage of colonizing a wide range of substrates (Armstrong 1988; During 1992). Owing to these peculiarities of the physiology and morphology of lichens, some factors determining the diversity of lichen communities are more pronounced, or, on the contrary, less important than those crucial for the diver- sity of vascular plant species (Buckley 2002; Löbel et al. 2006a; Paltto et al. 2006). 7 Many epigeic and epilithic lichens can colonize open habitats in the early stages of succession (Lawrey 1984; Longton 1992), e.g. terricolous and saxicolous lichens on islands. Environmental conditions on small islands and on the seashore are rather harsh and unsuitable for most organisms. Yet, many lichens are able to tolerate salinity, repeated drying and wetting, high light intensity, and the destructive effect of the winds and waves (Fletcher 1973a, b; Lawrey 1984). Habitat conditions in forest are much more stable and many of the forest-dwelling lichens favour the balanced light and moisture regime of a climax stand (e.g. old-growth forests) (Esseen et al. 1992; Rose 1992; Will- Wolf et al. 2002). However, occurrence of epiphytes depends first of all on the distribution of host trees, while the chemical and physical properties of the bark are considered more important than the fact to what species a tree belongs (Barkman 1958; Kuusinen 1996b). Species interactions (e.g. competition and facilitation) between lichen species and between lichens and other organisms (e.g. bryophytes) as well as small-scale disturbances also affect the structure of lichen communities (During & van Tooren 1990; Lawrey 1991a). Forest management
Recommended publications
  • Saare MAAKONNA Loodusväärtused Saare MAAKONNA Loodusväärtused 2 3
    SAARE MAAKONNA loodusväärtused SAARE MAAKONNA loodusväärtused 2 3 SISUKORD KAITSEALAD ................... 8 Odalätsi maastikukaitseala ....... 27 Vilsandi rahvuspark ............. 9 Panga maastikukaitseala ......... 27 Abruka looduskaitseala .......... 10 Üügu maastikukaitseala ......... 28 Laidevahe looduskaitseala ........ 11 HOIUALAD .................... 30 Liiva-Putla looduskaitseala ....... 12 Karala-Pilguse hoiuala ........... 31 Linnulaht .................... 13 Karujärve hoiuala .............. 31 Loode tammik ................ 14 Väikese väina hoiuala ........... 33 Rahuste looduskaitseala ......... 15 Viidumäe looduskaitseala ........ 16 KAITSEALUSED PARGID ........... 34 Viieristi looduskaitseala. 17 Kuressaare lossipark ............ 34 Järve luidete maastikukaitseala .... 20 Mihkel Ranna dendraarium ....... 34 Kaali maastikukaitseala .......... 20 Mõntu park .................. 35 Kaugatoma-Lõo maastikukaitseala .. 21 Pädaste park ................. 35 Kaart ....................... 22 ÜksikobjEKTID ................ 36 Kesselaiu maastikukaitseala ...... 25 Põlispuud ................... 36 Koigi maastikukaitseala .......... 25 Rändrahnud .................. 40 KAITSTAVATE LOODUSOBJEKTIDE VALITSEJA Keskkonnaamet Hiiu-Lääne-Saare regioon Tallinna 22, 93819 Kuressaare tel 452 7777 [email protected] www.keskkonnaamet.ee KAITSTAVATE LOODUSOBJEKTIDE KÜLASTUSE KORRALDAJA RMK loodushoiuosakond Viljandi mnt. 18b, 11216 Tallinn [email protected] www.rmk.ee Koostaja: Maris Sepp Trükise valmimisele aitasid kaasa: Kadri Paomees, Rein Nellis, Veljo
    [Show full text]
  • Lõputöö-Hookan-Lember.Pdf (2.127Mb)
    Sisekaitseakadeemia Päästekolledž Hookan Lember RS150 PÄÄSTESÜNDMUSTE ANALÜÜS PÜSIASUSTUSEGA VÄIKESAARTEL Lõputöö Juhendaja: Häli Allas MA Kaasjuhendaja: Andres Mumma Tallinn 2018 ANNOTATSIOON Päästekolledž Kaitsmine: juuni 2018 Töö pealkiri eesti keeles: Päästesündmuste analüüs püsiasustusega väikesaartel Töö pealkiri võõrkeeles: The analysis of rescue events on small islands with permanent settlements Lühikokkuvõte: Töö on kirjutatud eesti keeles ning eesti ja inglise keelse kokkuvõttega. Töö koos lisadega on kirjutatud kokku 61 lehel, millest põhiosa on 38 lehekülge. Lõputöö koosneb kolmest peatükist, kus on kasutatud kahte tabelit ja seitseteist joonist. Valitud teema uurimisprobleemiks on tervikliku ülevaate puudumine väikesaarte sündmustest, mis kuuluvad Päästeameti valdkonda. Väikesaartele toimub reageerimine erinevalt ning sõltuvalt aastaajast on reageerimine raskendatud. Ühtseid põhimõtteid rahvaarvu või sündmuste arvu kohta ei ole. Lõputöö eesmärk on analüüsida päästesündmusi väikesaartel aastatel 2009-2017 ning järeldada, millist päästevõimekust vajavad püsiasutustega väikesaared. Lõputöös antakse saartest ülevaade, mis on valimis välja toodud ning visualiseeritakse joonise abil saartel elavate püsielanike arv. Eesmärgi saavutamiseks kasutati kvantitatiivset uurimismeetodit, kus Häirekeskuselt saadud andmed korrastati ja analüüsiti. Lõputöös anti ülevaade, millised on sündmused saartel ning tehti järeldused, kuidas tagada kiire ja kvaliteetse abi kättesaadavus. Saartel, kus elanike arv on väike ning sündmuste arv minimaalne,
    [Show full text]
  • Lichens and Associated Fungi from Glacier Bay National Park, Alaska
    The Lichenologist (2020), 52,61–181 doi:10.1017/S0024282920000079 Standard Paper Lichens and associated fungi from Glacier Bay National Park, Alaska Toby Spribille1,2,3 , Alan M. Fryday4 , Sergio Pérez-Ortega5 , Måns Svensson6, Tor Tønsberg7, Stefan Ekman6 , Håkon Holien8,9, Philipp Resl10 , Kevin Schneider11, Edith Stabentheiner2, Holger Thüs12,13 , Jan Vondrák14,15 and Lewis Sharman16 1Department of Biological Sciences, CW405, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2R3, Canada; 2Department of Plant Sciences, Institute of Biology, University of Graz, NAWI Graz, Holteigasse 6, 8010 Graz, Austria; 3Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, 32 Campus Drive, Missoula, Montana 59812, USA; 4Herbarium, Department of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA; 5Real Jardín Botánico (CSIC), Departamento de Micología, Calle Claudio Moyano 1, E-28014 Madrid, Spain; 6Museum of Evolution, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 16, SE-75236 Uppsala, Sweden; 7Department of Natural History, University Museum of Bergen Allégt. 41, P.O. Box 7800, N-5020 Bergen, Norway; 8Faculty of Bioscience and Aquaculture, Nord University, Box 2501, NO-7729 Steinkjer, Norway; 9NTNU University Museum, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway; 10Faculty of Biology, Department I, Systematic Botany and Mycology, University of Munich (LMU), Menzinger Straße 67, 80638 München, Germany; 11Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK; 12Botany Department, State Museum of Natural History Stuttgart, Rosenstein 1, 70191 Stuttgart, Germany; 13Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK; 14Institute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, 252 43 Průhonice, Czech Republic; 15Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 1760, CZ-370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic and 16Glacier Bay National Park & Preserve, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Opuscula Philolichenum, 6: 87-120. 2009
    Opuscula Philolichenum, 6: 87–120. 2009. Lichenicolous fungi and some lichens from the Holarctic 1 MIKHAIL P. ZHURBENKO ABSTRACT. – 102 species of lichenicolous fungi and 23 lichens are reported, mainly from the Russian Arctic. Four new taxa are described: Clypeococcum bisporum (on Cetraria and Flavocetraria), Echinodiscus kozhevnikovii (on Cetraria), Stigmidium hafellneri (on Flavocetraria) and Gypsoplaca macrophylla f. blastidiata. The following lichenicolous fungi are reported for the first time from North America: Monodictys fuliginosa, Stigmidium microcarpum and Trichosphaeria lichenum. The following lichenicolous fungi and lichens are reported as new to Asia: Arthonia almquistii, Arthophacopsis parmeliarum, Cercidospora lobothalliae, Clypeococcum placopsiphilum, Dactylospora cf. aeruginosa, D. frigida, Epicladonia sandstedei, Everniicola flexispora, Hypogymnia fistulosa, Lecanora luteovernalis, Lecanographa rinodinae, Lichenochora mediterraneae, Lichenopeltella peltigericola, Lichenopuccinia poeltii, Lichenosticta alcicornaria, Phoma cytospora, Polycoccum ventosicola, Roselliniopsis gelidaria, R. ventosa, Sclerococcum gelidarum, Scoliciosporum intrusum, Stigmidium croceae, S. mycobilimbiae, S. stygnospilum, S. superpositum, Taeniolella diederichiana, Thelocarpon impressellum and Zwackhiomyces macrosporus. Twenty-eight species are new to Russia, 15 new to the Arctic, five new to Mongolia and nine new to Alaska. Twenty lichen genera and 31 species are new hosts for various species of lichenicolous fungi. INTRODUCTION This paper deals
    [Show full text]
  • Eestimaa Looduse Fond Vilsandi Rahvuspargi Kaitsekorralduskava
    ELF-i poolt Keskkonnaametile üle antud kinnitamata versioon Eestimaa Looduse Fond Vilsandi rahvuspargi kaitsekorralduskava aastateks 2011-2020 Liis Kuresoo ja Kaupo Kohv Tartu-Vilsandi 2010 ELF-i poolt Keskkonnaametile üle antud kinnitamata versioon SISUKORD Sissejuhatus ..................................................................................................................................... 6 1 Vilsandi rahvuspargi iseloomustus ......................................................................................... 8 1.1 Vilsandi rahvuspargi asend .......................................................................................... 8 1.2 Vilsandi rahvuspargi geomorfoloogiline ja bioloogiline iseloomustus ....................... 8 1.3 Vilsandi rahvuspargi kaitse-eesmärk, kaitsekord ja rahvusvaheline staatus................ 8 1.4 Maakasutus ja maaomand ............................................................................................ 9 1.5 Huvigrupid ................................................................................................................. 13 1.6 Vilsandi rahvuspargi visioon ..................................................................................... 16 2 Väärtused ja kaitse-eesmärgid .............................................................................................. 17 Elustik ........................................................................................................................................... 17 2.1 Linnustik ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Provisional Checklist of the Lichens of Belarus
    Opuscula Philolichenum, 17: 374-479. 2018. *pdf effectively published online 31December2018 via (http://sweetgum.nybg.org/philolichenum/) A Provisional Checklist of the Lichens of Belarus ANDREI TSURYKAU1 ABSTRACT. – A total of 606 species and five subspecific taxa of lichens and allied fungi are documented from Belarus based on combined historical (pre-1980) and modern (post-1980) records. Of these, 50 (8.3%) are represented by only historical reports, 235 (38.8%) are represented by only modern vouchers, and 310 (51.2%) are represented by both historical and modern records. Eleven species are known only from generalized published reports that lacked specific location data. Eighty-eight species are excluded as erroneous reports, or considered as doubtful records. KEYWORDS. – Biodiversity, distribution, lichenized fungi, historical baseline. INTRODUCTION Published accounts of the lichens of Belarus date to the end of the 18th century (Gilibert 1781). In the first phase of lichenological discovery in the country (1780–1900) lichens did not attract special attention and were reported among the general lists of vascular plants and fungi. However, 49 species were reported by the French botanist J.E. Gilibert, the Russian ethnographer of Belarusian origin N. Downar (Dovnar-Zapol'skiy) and Polish botanists K. Filipowicz and F. Błoński (Błoński 1888, 1889; Downar 1861; Filipowicz 1881; Gilibert 1781, 1792). In the early 20th century (1900–1925), there was a second phase of lichenological discovery in Belarus. During that time, Belarusian pioneer lichenologist V.P. Savicz and his wife L.I. Ljubitzkaja (later Savicz-Ljubitzkaja) reported 91 species new to the country (Ljubitzkaja 1914; Savicz 1909, 1910, 1911, 1925; Savicz & Savicz 1924; Wyssotzky et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Flechten, Lichenicole Pilze Und Moose Aus Dem Nordwest- Kaukasus – Zweiter Nachtrag
    Herzogia 20 (2007): 221–237 221 Flechten, lichenicole Pilze und Moose aus dem Nordwest- Kaukasus – zweiter Nachtrag Volker OTTE Zusammenfassung: OTTE, V. 2007. Flechten, lichenicole Pilze und Moose aus dem Nordwest-Kaukasus – zweiter Nachtrag. – Herzogia 20: 221–237. Es werden erneut Mitteilungen zur Kryptogamenflora des bergigen Teils von Adygeja und angrenzenden Gebieten sowie von der nördlichen kaukasischen Schwarzmeerküste gemacht, darunter die Erstnachweise von 63 Taxa für den nordwestlichen Kaukasus. Hierunter sind weitere Beispiele für in Europa fehlende Arten mit „Ostseitenverbreitung“. Ihre lokale Verbreitung stützt eine ökogeographische Erklärung dieses Phänomens. Abstract: OTTE, V. 2007. Lichens, lichenicolous fungi and bryophytes from the north-west Caucasus – second sup- plement. – Herzogia 20: 221–237. New data is given on cryptogamic flora of the mountainous part of Adygheya and adjacent regions and of the northern Caucasian Black Sea coast, among them the first records of 63 taxa to the north-west Caucasus. The records contain further examples of species with an „eastern distribution affinity“ lacking in Europe. Their local distribution supports an ecogeographical explanation of this phenomenon. Key words: Cryptogamic flora, Adygheya, Caucasian Black Sea coast, Tertiary relicts, biodiversity. Einleitung In den letzten Jahren hat es weitere Fortschritte in der Kenntnis der Kryptogamenflora des nordwestlichen Kaukasus gegeben. Mit den Arbeiten von Pišut (2002), URBANAVICHUS & URBANAVICHENE (2003), BLINKOVA et al. (2003), HIMELBRANT et al. (2003), ESKIN et al. (2004), BLINKOVA (2004), OTTE (2005) und BLINKOVA & URBANAVICHUS (2005) ist eine ganze Reihe von Publikationen erschienen, die unsere Kenntnis der Flechtenflora des Gebietes erweitert haben. Einzelne Angaben finden sich auch bei PRINTZEN & OTTE (2005) und OTTE (2007a, 2007b).
    [Show full text]
  • Võru Kirjakeele Sõnamuutmissüsteem
    DISSERTATIONES PHILOLOGIAE ESTONICAE UNIVERSITATIS TARTUENSIS 20 DISSERTATIONES PHILOLOGIAE ESTONICAE UNIVERSITATIS TARTUENSIS 20 VÕRU KIRJAKEELE SÕNAMUUTMISSÜSTEEM SULEV IVA Tartu Ülikooli filosoofiateaduskond, eesti ja üldkeeleteaduse instituut Väitekirja on kaitsmisele suunanud Tartu Ülikooli filosoofiateaduskonna eesti ja üldkeeleteaduse instituudi nõukogu 20. novembril 2007. Juhendajad: professor Karl Pajusalu, emeriitprofessor Tiit-Rein Viitso Retsensendid: professor Riho Grünthal (Helsingi ülikool) professor Jüri Viikberg (Tallinna ülikool) Kaitsmine toimub 18. detsembril 2007 kell 15.45 Tartu Ülikooli nõukogu saalis. Keeleteaduse ja -tehnoloogia doktorikool ISSN 1406–1325 ISBN 978–9949–11–791–8 (trükis) ISBN 978–9949–11–792–5 (PDF) Autoriõigus Sulev Iva, 2007 Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus www.tyk.ee Tellimus nr 512 EESSÕNA Oma emakeele, võru keele probleemidega olen tegelnud eelmise kümnendi algusest saadik. Kogu selle aja on mul võimalik olnud jälgida võru kirjakeele arengut, sellele ka ise kaasa aidates. 1980. aastate lõpus avaldatud esimesed võru kirjakeele põhimõtted arenesid edasi võrukeelsetes suveülikoolides, mille keeletoimkondade liikmeks mul on olnud au olla. Ühise keeletöö tulemusena ilmus esimene võru kirjakeele praktiline grammatika (Jüvä 1994), mille sünnile andsid suure panuse Enn Kasak ja Toomas Help, kes innustasid mind ka võru kirjakeelega edasi tegelema. Edasi on mul olnud hea võimalus võru kirjakeelega tegelda juba igapäeva- tööna Võru Instituudis, alates selle asutamisest 1995. aastal. Töös sain innustust instituudi
    [Show full text]
  • Revisions of British and Irish Lichens
    Revisions of British and Irish Lichens Volume 6 January 2021 Pertusariales: Pertusariaceae Cover image: Pertusaria pertusa, on bark of Acer pseudoplatanus, near Pitlochry, E Perthshire. Revisions of British and Irish Lichens is a free-to-access serial publication under the auspices of the British Lichen Society, that charts changes in our understanding of the lichens and lichenicolous fungi of Great Britain and Ireland. Each volume will be devoted to a particular family (or group of families), and will include descriptions, keys, habitat and distribution data for all the species included. The maps are based on information from the BLS Lichen Database, that also includes data from the historical Mapping Scheme and the Lichen Ireland database. The choice of subject for each volume will depend on the extent of changes in classification for the families concerned, and the number of newly recognized species since previous treatments. To date, accounts of lichens from our region have been published in book form. However, the time taken to compile new printed editions of the entire lichen biota of Britain and Ireland is extensive, and many parts are out-of-date even as they are published. Issuing updates as a serial electronic publication means that important changes in understanding of our lichens can be made available with a shorter delay. The accounts may also be compiled at intervals into complete printed accounts, as new editions of the Lichens of Great Britain and Ireland. Editorial Board Dr P.F. Cannon (Department of Taxonomy & Biodiversity, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey TW9 3AB, UK). Dr A. Aptroot (Laboratório de Botânica/Liquenologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Avenida Costa e Silva s/n, Bairro Universitário, CEP 79070-900, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil) Dr B.J.
    [Show full text]
  • Tänavused Kaunid Kodud on Selgunud
    SaaremaaSaaremaa TeatajaTeataja NrNr 612 II aastakäikII aastakäik Neljapäev, Neljapäev, 4. 4.aprill juuli 2019 2019 SAAREMAASAAREMAA VALLAVALITSUSEVALLAVALITSUSE INFOLEHTINFOLEHT facebook.com/saaremaavald Kaasav eelarveTudengid teeb saadavad Prügi põletamineLaps tülitsevas peres. Huviharidus-Tõrise hoiab oma head ideedsaarlased kiirelt teoks metsa saastab sinuMis aiaviljad aitaks? konverentsilkultuuripärandit anti õnne valemeid Loe lk 3 Loe lk 3 Loe lk 4 Loe lk 4 LoeLoe lklk 56 AvanebEterniidi projekti- ja asbesti- Tänavused kaunid toetustejäätmete kogumisringtaotlusvoor Lümanda Majas MittetulundustegevuseSaaremaa valla elanikud toetamise ja suvilaomanikud projekti- toetustesaavad asbestijäätmete2019. aasta taotlusvoor kogumisringi on avatud käigus 1. aprillisttasuta ära kuni anda 18. kogu aprillini oma kasutultkell 16.00. seisva Toetust eter- antakseniidi ja kogukonnamuud asbestijäätmed. ja valla arengule Kogumisring suunatud kodud on selgunud tegevuste/üritustetoimub juuli teises toetamiseks pooles viieteistkümnes ning samuti käivad hoogsalt teistekogumispunktis rahastamisallikate üle kogu kaudu valla. esitatavate Eelregistreeri pro-- Saare maakonna „Ees- jektidemist ei oma toimu, nantseeringu jäätmete toojad katmise registreeritakse toetamiseks. kohapeal.Tegevused, mis toetuse abil ellu viiakse, pea- ti Kaunis Kodu 2019“ vadEterniiti toimuma saab valla kogumispunkti haldusterritooriumil, viia olemapäeva komisjon valis välja tä- suunatudjooksul alates valla klelanikele 8 kuni ja/või kl 19 esindamaning ühelt valda ini- navused kolm kaunimat
    [Show full text]
  • Remarkable Records of Lichens and Lichenicolous Fungi Found During a Nordic Lichen Society Meeting in Estonia
    Folia Cryptog. Estonica, Fasc. 57: 73–84 (2020) https://doi.org/10.12697/fce.2020.57.09 Where the interesting species grow – remarkable records of lichens and lichenicolous fungi found during a Nordic Lichen Society meeting in Estonia Ave Suija1, Inga Jüriado1, Piret Lõhmus1, Rolands Moisejevs2, Jurga Motiejūnaitė3, Andrei Tsurykau4,5, Martin Kukwa6 1Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Lai 40, EE-51005 Tartu, Estonia. E-mails: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] 2Institute of Life Sciences and Technology, Daugavpils University, Parades 1A, LV-5401 Daugavpils, Latvia. E-mail: [email protected] 3Institute of Botany, Nature Research Centre, Žaliųjų Ežerų 49, LT-08406 Vilnius, Lithuania. E-mail: [email protected] 4Department of Biology, Francisk Skorina Gomel State University, Sovetskaja 104, BY-246019 Gomel, Belarus. E-mail: [email protected] 5Department of Ecology, Botany and Nature Protection, Institute of Natural Sciences, Samara National Research University, Moskovskoye road 34, RU-443086 Samara, Russia 6Department of Plant Taxonomy and Nature Conservation, Faculty of Biology, University of Gdańsk, Wita Stwosza 59, PL-80–308 Gdańsk, Poland. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: In August 2019, the Nordic Lichen Society held its bi-annual meeting and excursion in south-western Estonia. The most remarkable findings of lichenized and lichenicolous fungi are recorded herewith, including nine new species (of them two lichenicolous), and one new intraspecific taxon for the country. Full species lists are provided for two notable locations, sandstone outcrop at the river Pärnu and an oak woodland in the Naissoo Nature Reserve, for which no previous data were available, to illustrate the importance of collective survey effort.
    [Show full text]
  • Corrections, Notes and Observations on LGBI2
    Corrections to the Flora: Part 2 Last revised 4th April 2017 A list of ‘Corrections’ was started soon after the publication of the 2009 Flora. By 2015 a considerable list of typographic errors, suggested additions to the text and simple corrections based on published information had been compiled. These are in black text. Additions to this list from 2016 onwards are in blue text. Members of the British Lichen Society also started to report instances where their own taxonomic and ecological observations differed from the Flora account. These notes are added in purple text; these are of considerable interest and importance but often rely on unpublished observations. The purple text should be considered as provisional, speculative and/or providing discussion of ways that a future version of the Flora might be improved. Nomenclature is as used in the Flora. Species added to the British list since the publication of the Flora are not mentioned. Updating taxonomy is a separate project. For a few species notes on changes in distribution have been added but this does not represent a comprehensive update of distributional information. Inconsistencies that run through the ‘Flora’ (TLGB&I). There are various inconsistencies in nomenclature which appear to have arisen due to the different sources and the different authors for the various generic accounts. Thallus: Sources on the internet suggest that ‘thallus’ is the term given to undifferentiated vegetative tissue in diverse groups which were previously known as thallophytes (including algae, fungi and others). In TLGB&I the term thallus appears to have been used inconsistently, sometimes to imply lichenization and elsewhere in the wider sense to describe the presence of vegetative hyphae.
    [Show full text]