Friction Produced by Types of Elastomeric Ligatures in Treatment Mechanics with the Preadjusted Appliance
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Angle Orthodontist, Vol 76, 211 No 2, 2006 Original Article Friction Produced by Types of Elastomeric Ligatures in Treatment Mechanics with the Preadjusted Appliance Tiziano Baccettia,b; Lorenzo Franchic,d ABSTRACT The objective was to compare the frictional forces generated by new nonconventional passive elastomeric ligatures (NCL) and conventional elastomeric ligatures (CL) under dry conditions. An experimental model reproducing the right buccal segment of the upper arch and consisting of five stainless steel 0.022-inch preadjusted brackets (from the second premolar through the central incisor) was used to assess both static and kinetic frictional forces produced by NCL and CL. The frictional forces generated by the 0.019 X 0.025–inch stainless steel wire with the two types of elastomeric ligatures were recorded by sliding the wire into the aligned brackets. The friction produced by the 0.014-inch superelastic nickel titanium wire was evaluated both in the presence of aligned brackets and of three-mm misaligned canine bracket. The amount of both static and kinetic frictions were minimal (<10 g) in the NCL group in the presence of aligned brackets with both types of wires, whereas it ranged from a minimum of 95.6 g for the 0.014-inch superelastic nickel titanium wire to a maximum of 590.7 g for the 0.019 X 0.025–inch stainless steel wire when using CL. The amount of both static and kinetic frictions in the presence of a misaligned canine bracket in the NCL group were less than half of that shown by the CL group. A recently developed passive ligature system is able to produce significantly lower levels of frictional forces in vitro when compared with conventional elastomeric modules. (Angle Orthod 2006;76:211–216.) KEY WORDS: Orthodontic appliances; Orthodontic brackets; Orthodontic wires; Polyurethanes; Friction INTRODUCTION fixed appliance therapy depends on the fraction of 1 Treatment mechanics with the preadjusted appli- force delivered with respect to the force applied, high ance represent an effective method for controlled frictional forces due to the interaction between the orthodontic tooth movement. During this type of bracket and the guiding archwire affect treatment out- 2–6 mechanics,a frictional force is produced at the brack- comes and duration in a negative manner. By con- et/archwire/ligature (BAL) unit that tends to contrast trolling frictional resistance at the BAL interfaces, the desired tooth movement. Because the efficiency of lower levels of force can be applied during orthodontic treatment to obtain an optimal biological response for effective tooth movement.7,8 a Assistant Professor, Department of Orthodontics, The The clinician must be cognizant of the main fac- University of Florence, Florence, Italy. tors that influence frictional resistance at the BAL unit. b Thomas M. Graber Visiting Scholar, Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, The Among these factors, features of both archwire and University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich. bracket (in terms of size and material) have been c Research Associate, Department of Orthodontics, The investigated extensively in relation to friction produc- University of Florence, Florence, Italy. tion.9–17 On the other hand, it appears that methods d Thomas M. Graber Visiting Scholar, Department of and properties of archwire ligation, which entail an Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, The important role in the generation of friction, have University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich. Corresponding author: Dr. Tiziano Baccetti, Dipartimento di received limited attention in literature with respect to Odontostomatologia, Universita` degli Studi di Firenze, Via del frictional resistance at the BAL unit. Ponte di Mezzo, 46-48 50127, Firenze, Italy The importance of the ligature in creating friction (e-mail: [email protected]) at the BAL unit is emphasized indirectly by therapeuti- cal approaches that avoid the use of any form of Accepted: May 2005. Submitted: January 2005. ligature (self-ligating bracket systems). These systems © 2006 by The EH Angle Education and Research Foundation, Inc. present with significantly lower levels of frictional FIGURE 1. (A and B) The nonconventional elastomeric ligature. FIGURE 2. (A and B) The conventional elastomeric ligature.This When the ligature is applied on the bracket, the interaction ligature presses actively the archwire into the bracket slot. between the ligature and the slot forms a tubelike structure, which allows the archwire to slide freely. MATERIALS AND METHODS resistance when compared with conventional bracket An experimental model reproducing the right systems with conventional ligatures.18–22 Furthermore, buccal segment of the upper arch was used to assess reduced levels of friction during treatment can be the frictional forces produced by the NCLs (Figure 1) obtained also by differential placement of conventional and by CLs (Figure 2). The buccal segment model elastomeric ligatures (CLs) on special versatile brack- consisted of five stainless steel 0.022inch preadjusted ets (Synergy, Rocky Mountain Orthodontics, Denver, brackets for the second premolar, first premolar, Colo)23 or by using lubricated elastomeric modules24,25 canine, lateral incisor, and central incisor (STEP® or loosely tied stainless steel ligatures.23,24,26,27 brackets). A section of the 0.0215 X 0.028–inch stain- Recently, an innovative ligature manufactured with less steel wire was used to align the brackets before a special polyurethane mix by injection molding (Slide®, blocking them inside a vicelike device25 (Figure 3). The Ortho Technology, Tampa, Florida, USA) was intro- distance between the brackets was set at 19 mm. duced (Figure 1). The ‘‘nonconventional’’ elastomeric Two different types of 18-cm-long wires were ligature (NCL) is used on conventional brackets to pro- tested: 0.019 X 0.025–inch stainless steel wire and duce low levels of frictional resistance in treatment 0.014-inch superelastic nickel titanium wire mechanics with the preadjusted appliance. Once the (Memoria®wire). The two types of wires were secured ligature is applied on the bracket, the interaction into the preadjusted brackets by using two types of between the ligature and the slot forms a ‘‘tubelike’’ elastomeric ligatures produced by injection molding: structure, which allows the archwire to slide freely and nonconventional ligatures (Slide®) and CLs (silver mini to produce its effects more readily on the dentoalveolar modules, with an inside diameter of 1.3 mm and a component. These ligatures can be applied on specific thickness of 0.9 mm). The frictional forces generated groups of teeth where lower levels of friction at the BAL by the 0.019 X 0.025–inch stainless steel wire with the units are desired. two types of elastomeric ligatures were recorded by The aim of this investigation was to compare the sliding the wire into the aligned brackets. Friction pro- frictional forces generated by the NCLs with respect to duced by the 0.014-inch superelastic nickel titanium CLs using an in vitro study in the dry state. wire with the two types of elastomeric ligatures was FIGURE 3. Experimental in vitro model reproducing the right buc- cal segment of the upper arch that was used to assess the friction- al forces produced by nonconventional elastomeric ligature and by conventional elastomeric ligature (Figure 2). The buccal segment model consisted of five stainless steel 0.022-inch preadjusted brackets for the second premolar, first premolar, canine, lateral incisor, and central incisor. The brackets were aligned and blocked inside a vicelike device. FIGURE 5. Friction testing apparatus. The test wire is ligated into the experimental model, and its bottom end is clamped by a vice mounted on the Instron crosshead. FIGURE 4. Experimental in vitro model with three-mm misaligned canine bracket and 0.014-inch wire. by each wire/ ligature combination with aligned brack- ets for the 0.019 X 0.025–inch stainless steel wire and with both aligned and misaligned brackets for the 0.014-inch superelastic nickel titanium wire were test- evaluated both in the presence of aligned brackets ed 10 times with new wires and ligatures on each and of misaligned canine bracket (Figure 4). The vice- occasion. like device was allowed to create a three-mm misalign- A total of 60 tests (30 tests for each type of ment of the canine bracket in an upward direction. elastomeric ligatures) were carried out. Static and kinet- The friction generated by the testing unit ic friction forces were recorded while 15 mm of wire was consisting of wire, brackets, and elastomeric drawn through the brackets at a speed of 15 mm/min. ligatures were measured under dry conditions and at Static friction was defined as the force needed to start room temperature (20 +_2oC) using an Instron 4301 the wire moving through the bracket assembly. This testing machine (Instron Corp, Canton, Mass) with a force was measured as the maximal initial rise on the load cell of 10 N. The testing machine had been cali- Instron chart trace (Figure 6). Recommendations for brated by the Instron Calibration Laboratory in terms usage with the Instron machine strongly suggest that of crosshead displacement/speed and load cell. The in tests measuring kinetic friction this must be evaluat- test wire was inserted into the testing unit, and its bot- ed as an average of the frictional forces appraised at tom end was clamped by a vice and mounted on the subsequent time periods during displacement. For the Instron crosshead (Figure 5). The elastomeric liga- purpose of this study, measurements of kinetic friction tures were placed immediately before each test run, to were performed at two, five, and 10 mm of displace- avoid ligature force decay. Frictional forces produced ment during experiment and then averaged (Figure 6). RESULTS The descriptive statistics and the analysis of the comparisons on static and kinetic frictional forces for the two ligature systems are shown in Tables 1 and 2.