West Syrian Commentaries on the Eucharist a Study of the Methodology
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
WEST SYRIAN COMMENTARIES ON THE EUCHARIST WEST SYRIAN COMMENTARIES ON THE EUCHARIST A STUDY OF THE METHODOLOGY B. VARGHESE Since the beginning of Christianity, Mystagogia or the exposition of the meaning of the liturgical celebrations, especially those of Baptism and Eucharist, was an integral part of the Christian kerygma.1 Mystagogia, an in- troduction or an initiation to the mystery, has two dimensions: celebration of the mystery and its interpretation. They are inseparable. The meaning of a rite is communicated to the faithful primarily by the prayers of the cel- ebration. But an understanding of the rite grew up in the Church along with the development of the liturgy. By the third century, the tradition to give symbolical interpretation to the rites became normal. In the fourth cen- tury, we find a distinction between the Catechetical Homilies addressed to the Catechumens and the Mystagogical Catechesis delivered to the neo- phytes.2 The subject of the first was the basic Christian doctrines as ex- pressed in the Creed along with a partial exposition of the baptismal rites, whereas in the second type of homilies the sacraments of Baptism, Chrisma- tion and Eucharist were explained. The only West Syrian Catechetical homi- lies known to us, are those of Severus of Antioch.3 Though the later West 1 On the Mystagogia of the Early Church: R. Bornet, Les commentaires byzantines de la divine liturgie du VIIe au XVe siècles, Archives de l’Orient chrétien, 9 (Paris, 1966), ch. 1 (= Bornet + page reference) The major work in the history of patristic and medieval exegesis is: H. de Lubac, Histoire et esprit. L’intelligence de l’Ecriture d’apres Origène, Théologie, 16 (Paris, 1950); Id., Exégèse medievale. Les quatre sens de l’Ecriture. Pt.I, Vol.1-2; Pt.II, vol.1- 2, Théologie, 41, 42, 59, (Paris, 1959-1964). E. Mazza, Mystagogy. A Theology of Liturgy in the Patristic Age (New York, 1989) (= Mazza + page reference). 2 Major studies on the early Catechetical Homilies are the following: H.M. Riley, The Christian Initiation: A Comparative Study of the Interpretation of the Baptismal Liturgy in the Mystagogical Writings of Cyril of Jerusalem, John Chrysostom, Theodore of Mopsuestia and Ambrose of Milan, Studies in Christian Antiquity, 17 (Washington, 1974). E.J. Yarnold, The Awe-Inspiring Rites of Initiation: Baptismal Homilies of the Fourth Century (Slough, 1971). 3 On the Catechetical Homilies of Severus: F. Graffin, ‘La catéchèse de Sévère d’Antioche’, L’Orient Syrien, 5 (1960), pp. 47-54. J. Gribomont, ‘La catéchèse de Sévère d’Antioche et le Credo’, Parole de l’Orient, 6-7 (1975-76), pp. 125-158. I.H. Dalmais, ‘Source baptismale et mystère pascale d’après les homélies de Sévère d’Antioche sur la préparation quadragesimale et l’entrée au baptème’, Parole de l’Orient, 6-7 (1975-76), pp. 349-356. 272 B. VARGHESE Syrian festal homilies have followed the style of Severus, his Catechetical homilies have not left much traces of influence on the commentaries on baptism. The West Syrian commentaries on sacraments, with a few exceptions, be- long to the category of ‘Mystagogical Commentaries’. West Syrian writers had a special preference for the sacraments of Baptism, Myron and the Eu- charist.4 However, they had written commentaries on different rites such as Ordination, Consecration of the Church, Monastic Profession or Funeral. TYPOLOGICAL AND ALLEGORICAL COMMENTARIES Before we look at the first Syriac commentaries, we must speak of the typo- logical and allegorical methods of liturgical interpretations, which were widely accepted since the fourth century. The distinction between these two types of explanation is important for the understanding the history of West Syrian liturgical interpretation. Typology seeks to explain the meaning of an event in the salvation history by relating it to another event whose inner meaning is fundamentally simi- lar.5 Thus the redemption achieved by Christ can be seen as the fulfillment of the Exodus and the Eucharist can be seen as actualizing the work of Christ, and pointing to the final accomplishment in the coming world. Saint Ephrem, Aphrahat and Jacob of Serugh followed the typological method to comment on the mystery of the liturgy. The West Syrian com- mentaries on Myron, as well as several sedre also followed this method. Typology is concerned with events as entities.6 But allegory is rather con- cerned with the details of events or things, and its interpretation of them can be unrelated to any fundamental similarity of meaning. Its symbolism 4 Cf. B. Varghese, Les onctions baptismales dans la tradition syrienne, CSCO, 512 (Louvain, 1989) (= Varghese + page reference). 5 Cf. H. Wybrew, The Orthodox Liturgy (New York, 1990), p. 63; Bornet, pp. 42-45. 6 Wybrew, p. 64; Bornet, pp. 42-45. R.P.C. Hanson, Allegory and Event. A Study of the Sources and Significance of Origen's Interpretation of Scripture (London, 1959) gives the fol- lowing definition: ‘Typology is the interpreting of an event belonging to the present or the recent past as the fulfillment of a similar relation recorded or prophesied in Scripture. Allegory is the interpretation of an object or person or a number of objects or persons as in reality meaning some object or person of a later time, with no attempt made to trace a relationship of “similar situation” between them’ (p. 7), quoted by Bornet, p. 44, n. 3. WEST SYRIAN COMMENTARIES ON THE EUCHARIST 273 tends to be arbitrary. In the allegorical interpretation, the mystery of Christ present in the Eucharist began to be broken down into various aspects. Saint John Chrysostom’s Catechetical Homilies attest the first stage of a tendency to associate different parts of the liturgy with different moments in the life of Christ. Thus Chrysostom says that the altar represents the manger of Bethlehem and that the incarnation as well as the passion are made present in the Eucharist.7 The first systematic allegorical explanation is found in Theodore of Mop- suestia’s Catechetical Homilies.8 Though he uses typology in his exegesis of Scripture, Theodore does not attempt to relate the Eucharist to any Old Tes- tament prefiguration. For him, the Eucharist is the memorial of the histori- cal life of Jesus, especially of His death and resurrection. Thus he relates the different aspects of the passion and death with successive stages in the cel- ebration. The procession with the bread and wine represents Christ’s jour- ney to the crucifixion. The deacons stand for the angels who consoled Him during His passion. The deposition of the bread and wine on the altar repre- sents Christ’s burial. The coming of the Holy Spirit in the Epiclesis symbol- izes the return of Christ’s Spirit to His body. The fraction recalls the mani- festation of the risen Lord. In the allegorical interpretation, the Antiochenes and the Alexandrians followed different approaches. Theodore is the representative of the former and Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite that of the latter.9 The fourth century Christological disputes born of adoptionism and arianism led to an empha- sis on the pre-existent divinity of the Logos and his consubstantiality with the Father. Alexandrians and Antiochenes offered their own solutions to this problem. The Alexandrian response was more concerned with the divinity of the Logos, and it led to a weakening of Christ’s mediatorship, as they had less to say about the historical economy of Christ’s saving work. The Antiochenes, on the other hand, put stress on Christ’s high priest- hood as pertaining to His humanity,10 and emphasized the saving works 7 Bornet, pp. 75-80. On Chrysostom’s mystagogy: Mazza, pp. 105-149. 8 Bornet, pp. 80-82; R. Taft, ‘The Liturgy of the Great Church: An initial synthesis of structure and interpretation on the eve of Iconoclasm' Dumbarton Oaks Papers, 34-35 (1980-1981), pp. 62-65 (= Taft + page reference). For a detailed study on the mystagogy of Theodore: Mazza, pp. 45-104. 9 On Dionysius: R. Roques, L’Univers dionysien, Théologie, 29 (Paris, 1954), pp. 245- 302; Bornet, pp. 65-72 (gives bibliography); Taft, pp. 61-62. 10 Taft, p. 69. 274 B. VARGHESE during His human life. These two approaches had lasting impacts on liturgi- cal interpretation. Both expounded the meaning of the liturgical rites with little or no reference to biblical typology. The Antiochenes interpreted the symbols or rites in relation to the saving work of Christ. But the Alexandrians tried to explain how the symbols or rites reveal the spiritual realities and lead us to the union with the One. Generally speaking, the West Syrian commentaries on Baptism and the Eucharist followed the allegorical method of liturgical interpretation as de- veloped by the Antiochenes, with occasional allegorical explanations in- spired by Dionysius. Apart from John of Dara, who was a strict Dionysian in his methodology, the West Syrians were faithful to Antiochene mystago- gical tradition. FIRST SYRIAC MYSTAGOGICAL COMMENTARIES Fourth century Syriac writers like Aphrahat or Ephrem have not left us any commentary on the sacraments. Ephrem’s Hymns on Nativity, Epiphany, Lent or Passover are in fact liturgical commentaries in the form of poetical meditations, probably composed to be sung on the corresponding feasts or seasons.11 The type of literature known as ‘Mystagogical Commentaries’ reached the Syriac tradition probably through the School of Edessa, where the homilies of Theodore of Mopsuestia were translated into Syriac in the fifth century or through the non-Chalcedonians. The popularity of Mysta- gogical Commentaries in the West Syrian Church since its organization in the Syriac speaking regions of the Roman and Persian Empires would sug- gest a non-Chalcedonian initiative in their introduction into the Syriac literature.