DOCSLIB.ORG

Field Crop and Forage Pests and Their Natural Enemies in Western Canada: Identification and Management

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Field Crop and Forage Pests and Their Natural Enemies in Western Canada: Identification and Management Field Crop and Forage Pests and their Natural Enemies in Western Canada: Identification and Management Canada 1 1 Field Crop and Forage Pests and their Natural Enemies in Western Canada: Identification and Management 2 3 4 Photo Credits: 1. Pea leaf weavil (Sitona lineatus) and leaf damage - Jonathon Williams, AAFC 2. Pteromalus puparum parasitizing an imported cabbage worm cocoon (Pieris rapae) - T. Haye, CABI 3. Lacewing (Chrysopa sp.) adult - John Gavloski, Manitoba Ministry of Agriculture Canada 4. Grasshopper - Jesse MacDonald, AAFC Prepared for Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada by Hugh Philip, IPM 2 GO Consulting Service. Field Crop and Forage Pests and their Natural Enemies in Western Canada: Identification and Management Field Guide Publication history: 2015 - 1st publication 2018 - 2nd publication, expanded © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, represented by the Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (2018). Electronic version available at www.publications.gc.ca Catalogue No. A59-23/2018E-PDF ISBN 978-0-660-25561-3 AAFC No. 12766E This publication may be cited as follows: Philip, H., B.A. Mori and K.D. Floate. 2018. Field crop and forage pests and their natural enemies in Western Canada: Identification and management field guide. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Saskatoon, SK. Paru également en français sous le titre Guide d’identification des ravageurs des grandes cultures et des cultures fourragères et de leurs ennemis naturels et mesures de lutte applicables à l’Ouest canadien For more information, reach us at www.agr.gc.ca or call us toll-free at 1-855-773-0241. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This publication is the result of a collaborative effort Project Team by many field-experienced extension and research ento- Hugh Philip, PAg – Writer, IPM 2 GO Consulting Service, mologists who recognized the need for an up-to-date Kelowna, BC field guide for the accurate identification of field and Dr. Kevin Floate - Writer, AAFC, Lethbridge, AB forage crop pests and their natural enemies. Dr. Boyd Mori - Writer, AAFC, Saskatoon, SK Erl Svendsen – Project manager/managing editor, AAFC, The information presented in this publication was Saskatoon, SK contributed by the project team members from their Dr. Owen Olfert – Project co-lead, AAFC, Saskatoon, SK own research or field experiences as well as that of other researchers who have made their research Collaborators available for educational purposes. I wish to thank the Dr. Hector Carcamo, AAFC, Lethbridge, AB team members for sharing their valuable time to submit Dr. Alejandro Costamagna, University of Manitoba, information and images, and to review and provide Winnipeg, MB feedback on the many draft documents. A special thanks Mike Dolinski, Edmonton, AB to Erl Svendsen for coordinating the development and Dr. Lloyd Dosdall, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB submission of the project proposal, for stick-handing Dr. John Gavloski, Manitoba Agriculture, the exchanges of draft documents, and for applying Food and Rural Development, Carmen, MB his excellent editing skills to ensure the publication will Scott Hartley, Saskatchewan Ministry of Agriculture, provide a useful and accurate reference for producers Regina, SK and their advisors, researchers, educators and others Scott Meers, Alberta Agriculture and Rural Development, associated with field and forage crop production in Brooks, AB Western Canada. Dr. Chrystel Olivier, AAFC, Saskatoon, SK Jennifer Otani, AAFC, Beaverlodge, AB The team is most appreciative of the support and Dr. Julie Soroka, AAFC, Saskatoon, SK encouragement of Dr. Cezarina Kora, Senior Strategies Peter Walsh, Lakeland College, Vermillion, AB Coordinator in Pest Management at Agriculture and Dr. Tyler Wist, AAFC, Saskatoon, SK Agri-Food Canada (AAFC), Pest Management Centre , Dr. Kevin Floate, AAFC, Lethbridge, AB and for the financial assistance of the Pest Management Centre which made this project possible. The project team also acknowledges the valuable input Design and production: gordongroup of the following colleagues for sharing their specialized knowledge to improve the accuracy of the information contained in this guide: Dr. Swaroop Kher, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB Dr. Fredrick Beaulieu, AAFC, Ottawa, ON i DEDICATION: TO LLOYD DOSDALL (1952–2014) Lloyd devoted his career to studying field crop insect pests and their natural enemies. He was known for his contagious enthusiasm and his entomological passion was divided between pesky crop bugs and aquatic entomology. Throughout his work, his goal was to lay the ecological foundation of plant-insect relationships in order to develop sustainable pest management practices that incorporated host plant resistance, cultural strategies and natural enemies. He, his students, and post-doctoral fellows completed numerous meticulous studies on plant-insect interactions for a number of insect pests including Bertha armyworm, flea beetles, diamondback moth, root maggots, cabbage seedpod weevil and cereal leaf beetle. Thanks to these efforts, plant breeders have the information and tools Education & Background: for including resistance traits into new cultivars. Lloyd studied the diversity of stoneflies (MSc) and black fly control (PhD) at the University of Saskatchewan. Lloyd left us an enormous legacy in integrated pest management that will benefit He then spent two years working on biting flies at the many generations of farmers on the Prairies. Lloyd was very careful to ensure that the University of Manitoba before moving to Vegreville information from research studies in agroecosystems found its way to the farming in 1989 to start work on crop insects at the Alberta community. This was in part accomplished by collaborating wholeheartedly with Environmental Centre. In 1999, he accepted a teaching agronomists, completing numerous seminal and innovative research projects with and research position at the University of Alberta, where them. In addition, he took exceptional care to take photos, record videos, and write he was active until his death. practical articles to extend the results of his work to help farmers manage crop pests in a more sustainable manner. One of Lloyd’s greatest legacies will be the people he trained either formally as a supervisor or informally through collaborations. Lloyd was highly valued and respected as a mentor by his students, post-doctoral fellows and colleagues. He gave generously of his time and worked side by side with his students to instill in them the pride and passion for entomological research. Somehow, he also found time to actively serve the regional and national entomological societies! We are fortunate that he trained many entomologists in his lab and we will see the fruits of his labour expressed in their contributions for years to come. May this dedication be a small tribute to the work and legacy of Lloyd—friend, colleague and mentor. ii Field Crop and Forage Pests and their Natural Enemies in Western Canada: Identification and Management Field Guide TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS..........................................................................................i DEDICATION: LLOYD DOSDALL...................................................................................ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ..........................................................................................iii INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 1 INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT ............................................................................. 3 KEY TO THE ORDERS OF PESTS OF FIELD CROPS AND THEIR NATURAL ENEMIES ............................... 7 DESCRIPTIONS OF FIELD CROP PESTS Acarina .....................................................................................................14 Coleoptera ..................................................................................................17 Diptera......................................................................................................35 Hemiptera: Auchenorrhyncha (syn. Homoptera) . 45 Hemiptera: Heteroptera .....................................................................................48 Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha (syn. Homoptera).................................................................59 Hymenoptera ...............................................................................................72 Lepidoptera . 73 Orthoptera .................................................................................................103 Thysanoptera ..............................................................................................107 DESCRIPTIONS OF NATURAL ENEMIES Arachnid Predators .........................................................................................110 Coleoptera Predators .......................................................................................115 Diptera Predators ..........................................................................................118 Diptera Parasitoids . .123 Hemiptera Predators .......................................................................................124 Hymenoptera Parasitoids...................................................................................129 Neuroptera Predators ......................................................................................139 Raphidioptera Predators....................................................................................140 GLOSSARY OF TERMS . .141 INTERNET INFORMATION RESOURCES
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sharon J. Collman WSU Snohomish County Extension Green Gardening Workshop October 21, 2015 Definition
    Sharon J. Collman WSU Snohomish County Extension Green Gardening Workshop October 21, 2015 Definition AKA exotic, alien, non-native, introduced, non-indigenous, or foreign sp. National Invasive Species Council definition: (1) “a non-native (alien) to the ecosystem” (2) “a species likely to cause economic or harm to human health or environment” Not all invasive species are foreign origin (Spartina, bullfrog) Not all foreign species are invasive (Most US ag species are not native) Definition increasingly includes exotic diseases (West Nile virus, anthrax etc.) Can include genetically modified/ engineered and transgenic organisms Executive Order 13112 (1999) Directed Federal agencies to make IS a priority, and: “Identify any actions which could affect the status of invasive species; use their respective programs & authorities to prevent introductions; detect & respond rapidly to invasions; monitor populations restore native species & habitats in invaded ecosystems conduct research; and promote public education.” Not authorize, fund, or carry out actions that cause/promote IS intro/spread Political, Social, Habitat, Ecological, Environmental, Economic, Health, Trade & Commerce, & Climate Change Considerations Historical Perspective Native Americans – Early explorers – Plant explorers in Europe Pioneers moving across the US Food - Plants – Stored products – Crops – renegade seed Animals – Insects – ants, slugs Travelers – gardeners exchanging plants with friends Invasive Species… …can also be moved by • Household goods • Vehicles
    [Show full text]
  • The Pentatomidae, Or Stink Bugs, of Kansas with a Key to Species (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) Richard J
    Fort Hays State University FHSU Scholars Repository Biology Faculty Papers Biology 2012 The eP ntatomidae, or Stink Bugs, of Kansas with a key to species (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) Richard J. Packauskas Fort Hays State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholars.fhsu.edu/biology_facpubs Part of the Biology Commons, and the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Packauskas, Richard J., "The eP ntatomidae, or Stink Bugs, of Kansas with a key to species (Hemiptera: Heteroptera)" (2012). Biology Faculty Papers. 2. http://scholars.fhsu.edu/biology_facpubs/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Biology at FHSU Scholars Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Biology Faculty Papers by an authorized administrator of FHSU Scholars Repository. 210 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST Vol. 45, Nos. 3 - 4 The Pentatomidae, or Stink Bugs, of Kansas with a key to species (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) Richard J. Packauskas1 Abstract Forty eight species of Pentatomidae are listed as occurring in the state of Kansas, nine of these are new state records. A key to all species known from the state of Kansas is given, along with some notes on new state records. ____________________ The family Pentatomidae, comprised of mainly phytophagous and a few predaceous species, is one of the largest families of Heteroptera. Some of the phytophagous species have a wide host range and this ability may make them the most economically important family among the Heteroptera (Panizzi et al. 2000). As a group, they have been found feeding on cotton, nuts, fruits, veg- etables, legumes, and grain crops (McPherson 1982, McPherson and McPherson 2000, Panizzi et al 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera of North America 5
    Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera by Valerio Albu, 1411 E. Sweetbriar Drive Fresno, CA 93720 and Eric Metzler, 1241 Kildale Square North Columbus, OH 43229 April 30, 2004 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Cover illustration: Blueberry Sphinx (Paonias astylus (Drury)], an eastern endemic. Photo by Valeriu Albu. ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 Abstract A list of 1531 species ofLepidoptera is presented, collected over 15 years (1988 to 2002), in eleven southern West Virginia counties. A variety of collecting methods was used, including netting, light attracting, light trapping and pheromone trapping. The specimens were identified by the currently available pictorial sources and determination keys. Many were also sent to specialists for confirmation or identification. The majority of the data was from Kanawha County, reflecting the area of more intensive sampling effort by the senior author. This imbalance of data between Kanawha County and other counties should even out with further sampling of the area. Key Words: Appalachian Mountains,
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Biological Control of Wireworm (Agriotes Lineatus) Damage To
    1 Biological Control of Wireworm (Agriotes lineatus) damage to potato with Metarhizium brunneum Isabel Aida Stewart [email protected] Kwantlen Polytechnic University 100298609, AGRI 4299, Mike Bomford, 12/11/2017 2 Abstract The larval stage of Agriotes lineatus, wireworm, is a challenging agricultural pest with a broad host range. It is a soil-dwelling arthropod that may live up to 5 years before pupating. Wireworms negatively affect crop yields and render produce un-saleable. Organic production systems have few means of managing this pest and this study explores the use of an entomopathogenic fungus, Metarhizium brunneum, as a bio-control. Three treatments - M. brunneum, M. brunneum with oats, and a non-treated control - were applied beneath seed potatoes. Damage to the tubers was classified by counting tuber hole abundance (Brandl et al., 2017). No statistically significant treatment effects were observed, but the proportion of potatoes that suffered wireworm damage was 33% lower in the M. brunneum and oat treatment than the control treatment and was numerically trending towards significance. Key words: Metarhizium, biocontrol, potato, wireworm, Agriotes lineatus, entomopathogenic fungi 3 Introduction Pest development of resistance to chemical insecticides is currently a pervasive issue in agriculture and it is paramount to advance alternatives that do not threaten the environment or our future capacity for agriculture. One solution to this issue that will be explored through this study is the use of non-persistent, non-toxic biological controls, often in the form of bacterial, fungal or nematode microbial agents. The pest that our research targets is the wireworm (Agriotes lineatus), the larval stage of the click beetle, which has a broad host range including carrots, cucurbits, rutabagas, onions, sweet corn, potatoes, sugar-beets, beans and peas (Chaput, 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Control of Aphids by the Predatory Midge Aphidoletes Aphidimyza in the Presence of Intraguild Predatory Bugs and Thrips
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Wageningen University & Research Publications Biological Control of Aphids by the Predatory Midge Aphidoletes aphidimyza in the Presence of Intraguild Predatory Bugs and Thrips G.J. Messelinka, C.M.J. Bloemhard and R. Vellekoop Wageningen UR Greenhouse Horticulture P.O. Box 20, 2265 ZG Bleiswijk The Netherlands Keywords: Myzus persicae, Orius laevigatus, Orius majusculus, sweet pepper, intraguild predation, hyperpredation, apparent competition, mixed diets Abstract In organically grown sweet peppers, aphids are the most important pest. The wide range of natural enemies of aphids, that are commercially available, is not a guarantee for successful control but rather an indication that this problem is difficult to tackle. Strategies for control vary among organic growers and it is still not known which natural enemy complexes give the best results. When releasing natural enemies for aphid control, it is important to consider the possible interactions with other pest species and natural enemies present. Within man-made natural enemy communities for multiple pest control, direct and indirect interactions occur which can enhance or disrupt biological control, such as predators eating other predators, behavioural changes, plant responses or apparent competition. Here we investigated the effects of the generalist predatory bugs Orius laevigatus and Orius majusculus on biological control of green peach aphids, Myzus persicae, by the predatory midge Aphidoletes aphidimyza in the absence or presence of thrips. Our results showed that intraguild predation of aphidophageous midges by generalist predatory bugs is a realistic phenomenon, but the risk of disruption of aphid control seems to be limited.
    [Show full text]
  • 39Th Biennial Report: Agricultural Research in Kansas
    This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu. This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu. Agricultural Research in Kansas 39th Biennial Report of the Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Report of the Director for the Biennium Ending June 30, 1998 This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu. FRONT COVER New alliances among research, education, and industry address all aspects of wheat production, processing, and marketing. We appreciate loans of photographs from: Mary Ellen Barkley Keith Behnke Ralph Charlton Barbara Gatewood Wayne Geyer Carol Shanklin This report was prepared in the Department of Communications by: Eileen Schofield, Senior Editor Gloria Schwartz, Publications Writer I Fred Anderson, Graphics Artist Information provided by: Teri Davis Doug Elcock Charisse Powell and KAES department offices This report is available on the World Wide Web at http://www.oznet.ksu.edu. Contribution no. 99-331-S from the Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu. Letter of Transmittal Office of the Director To the Honorable William Graves, Governor of Kansas It is my pleasure to transmit herewith the report of the Agricultural Experiment Station of the Kansas State University of Agriculture and Applied Science for the biennium ending June 30, 1998.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleophora Deauratella) Monitoring in the Peace River Region Otani, J.1, Jorgensen, A.1 1 Agriculture & Agri-Food Canada (AAFC), Beaverlodge, AB
    Red clover casebearer (Coleophora deauratella) monitoring in the Peace River Region Otani, J.1, Jorgensen, A.1 1 Agriculture & Agri-Food Canada (AAFC), Beaverlodge, AB Background 2014-004 Red 2nd-yr Q: Does RCCB larval abundance and development differ on red compared to alsike flower heads? The red clover casebearer moth (RCCB), Coleophora deauratella Lieneg & Zeller (Lepidoptera: Coleophoridae), is an invasive pest Methods: 2014-004 Mountain Trail 1 first found in the Peace River region in 2005 . RCCB can cause Hand collected flower heads from fields and ditches near nd 2 seed yield losses of ≥80% in 2 -year seed stands of red clover . Falher, AB (N=50 buds/species/site*; Table 1). 2 RCCB also utilizes Alsike clover . Individually monitored flowers for larval emergence (Fig. 4). RCCB is univoltine with moths commencing flight in mid-June in 2,3 the Peace River region. Eggs are laid on the calyx of florets . 2014-046 Red 1st-yr The larvae feed within then amongst the florets from June to late August then overwinter in field trash2,3. Monitoring Sites 2014-046 Lavadiere A B Fig. 4. Red clover flowers reared individually (A) and RCCB larva feeding within floret (B). 2014-048 Red 1st-yr Table 1. Density of Coleophora sp. larvae in red and alsike flower heads (N=50 flowers/patch)*sampled from seed stands and adjacent volunteer clover plants on July 23, 2014. 2014-048 Rochon Patch Number of larvae Density (Number of Site Crop Location size(m2) per patch larvae per flower)* Red Field 50 40 0.8 Site 2014- 049 Alsike Ditch 15 0 0 2014-049 Red 1st-yr Red Field 50 5 0.1 Site 2014-046 Alsike Ditch 5 0 0 RCCB Males / Day / Trap / Day Males RCCB Red Ditch 10 278 5.56 Site 2014-047 Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Arthropod Pest Management in Greenhouses and Interiorscapes E
    Arthropod Pest Management in Greenhouses and Interiorscapes E-1011E-1011 OklahomaOklahoma CooperativeCooperative ExtensionExtension ServiceService DivisionDivision ofof AgriculturalAgricultural SciencesSciences andand NaturalNatural ResourcesResources OklahomaOklahoma StateState UniversityUniversity Arthropod Pest Management in Greenhouses and Interiorscapes E-1011 Eric J. Rebek Extension Entomologist/ Ornamentals and Turfgrass Specialist Michael A. Schnelle Extension Ornamentals/ Floriculture Specialist ArthropodArthropod PestPest ManagementManagement inin GreenhousesGreenhouses andand InteriorscapesInteriorscapes Insects and their relatives cause major plant ing a hand lens. damage in commercial greenhouses and interi- Aphids feed on buds, leaves, stems, and roots orscapes. Identification of key pests and an un- by inserting their long, straw-like, piercing-suck- derstanding of appropriate control measures are ing mouthparts (stylets) and withdrawing plant essential to guard against costly crop losses. With sap. Expanding leaves from damaged buds may be tightening regulations on conventional insecti- curled or twisted and attacked leaves often display cides and increasing consumer sensitivity to their chlorotic (yellow-white) speckles where cell con- use in public spaces, growers must seek effective tents have been removed. A secondary problem pest management alternatives to conventional arises from sugary honeydew excreted by aphids. chemical control. Management strategies cen- Leaves may appear shiny and become sticky from tered around
    [Show full text]
  • Nota Lepidopterologica
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Nota lepidopterologica Jahr/Year: 1988 Band/Volume: 11 Autor(en)/Author(s): Razowski Josef [Jozef] Artikel/Article: Miscellaneous notes on Tortricidae 285-289 ©Societas Europaea Lepidopterologica; download unter http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/ und www.zobodat.at Nota lepid. 11 (4) : 285-289 ; 31.1.1989 ISSN 0342-7536 Miscellaneous notes on Tortricidae Jôzef Razowski Institute of Systematic and Experimental Zoology, P.A.S. 31-016 Krakow, Släwkowska 17, Poland. Summary Synonymical notes on several genera and species of Tortricidae are given. Stenop- teron, a new Cnephasiini genus is described. Phtheochroa undulata (Danilevskij, 1962), comb. n. This species was described on the basis of a single female from Central Asia (Dshungarian Ala-Tau). A specimen collected by Dr. Z. Kaszab, Buda- pest, in Mongolia (Gobi Altai aimak : Baga nuuryn urd els, 1200 m., 12.VII.1966) has almost identical wing markings as the holotype of undu- lata. Its male genitalia (Figs 1, 2) are characterised as follows. Uncus fairly short, tapering terminally ; socius broad, sublateral ; sacculus strong, ven- trally convex, with long subapical process ; median part of transtilla so- mewhat expanded dorsally, without any spines ; aedeagus as in Ph. pulvillana (H.-S.), but distal process of juxta absent. The described specimen is most probably conspecific with undulata. Acleris kuznetsovi nom. n. Croesia 6/co/orKuzNETSOV, 1964, Ent. Obozr. 43 : 879, junior secondary homonym of Acleris bicolor Kawabe, 1963, Trans, lep. Soc. Japan 14 : 70. The name bicolor became a junior homonym when Croesia Hübner was synonymised with Acleris Hübner (Razowski, 1987).
    [Show full text]
  • Grey Tortrix Moth
    PPeesstt AAlleerrtt GGrreeyy TToorrttrriixx MMootthh Grey tortrix (Cnephasia stephensiana) Identification caterpillars caused damage to alfalfa in the Williams Lake and Kersley regions of B.C. in Adults: Adults are greyish-white moths, about 2009, 2010 and 2011. Since 2011, damage by 18 - 22 mm wing span (Figure 1). this pest has been reported in Lumby, Larvae: Larvae vary in colour from yellowish Sparwood, Creston and Fort Fraser. Farmers are to brownish black (Figure 2). asked to report any suspect damage in new regions to the B.C. Ministry of Agriculture Life Cycle offices or contacts below: The life cycle in B.C. is not known but larvae are present by mid-June. In Japan and Europe, • Susanna Acheampong, Ministry of Cnephasia species are known to overwinter as Agriculture, Telephone: (250) 861-7681, young larvae in silken cocoons. The young Email: [email protected]) larvae feed from April to June, pupation occurs in June and July, and moths fly in July and • AgriService BC, Telephone: 1 888 221-7141 August. Email: [email protected] Figure 1. Adult Cnephasia stephensiana Figure 2. Left, young larva; Right, mature larva Damage On alfalfa, larvae feed by mining leaves and later live in spun or folded leaves (Figure 3). Hosts Hosts include alfalfa, legumes and weeds such as lambs quarters, hogweed, thistle, broad leaf plantain, dock, sorrel, dandelion and clover. In B.C., damage has been reported on alfalfa, cow parsnip, rhodiola, dandelion, clover, hogweed and pea vine. Control There are currently no registered chemical control products in Canada for this pest.
    [Show full text]
  • Household Insects of the Rocky Mountain States
    Household Insects of the Rocky Mountain States Bulletin 557A January 1994 Colorado State University, University of Wyoming, Montana State University Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Milan Rewerts, interim director of Cooperative Extension, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado. Cooperative Extension programs are available to all without discrimination. No endorsement of products named is intended nor is criticism implied of products not mentioned. FOREWORD This publication provides information on the identification, general biology and management of insects associated with homes in the Rocky Mountain/High Plains region. Records from Colorado, Wyoming and Montana were used as primary reference for the species to include. Mention of more specific localities (e.g., extreme southwestern Colorado, Front Range) is provided when the insects show more restricted distribution. Line drawings are provided to assist in identification. In addition, there are several lists based on habits (e.g., flying), size, and distribution in the home. These are found in tables and appendices throughout this manual. Control strategies are the choice of the home dweller. Often simple practices can be effective, once the biology and habits of the insect are understood. Many of the insects found in homes are merely casual invaders that do not reproduce nor pose a threat to humans, stored food or furnishings. These may often originate from conditions that exist outside the dwelling. Other insects found in homes may be controlled by sanitation and household maintenance, such as altering potential breeding areas (e.g., leaky faucets, spilled food, effective screening).
    [Show full text]
  • Semiochemical-Based Alternatives to Synthetic Toxicant Insecticides For
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Rothamsted Repository Arthropod-Plant Interactions DOI 10.1007/s11829-017-9569-6 ORIGINAL PAPER Semiochemical‑based alternatives to synthetic toxicant insecticides for pollen beetle management Alice L. Mauchline1 · Maxime R. Hervé2 · Samantha M. Cook3 Received: 31 March 2017 / Accepted: 3 October 2017 © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of United Kingdom 2017 Abstract There is an urgent need to develop sustainable Introduction pest management systems to protect arable crops in order to replace the current over-reliance on synthetic insecticides. The pollen beetle Brassicogethes aeneus Fab. (synonym Semiochemicals are insect- or plant-derived chemicals that Meligethes aeneus) (Coleoptera: Nitidulidae) is a major are used by organisms as information signals. Integrated pest pest of oilseed rape (OSR) (Brassica napus L.) crops (Wil- management tools are currently in development that utilise liams 2010). Of the suite of pests that attack OSR, pollen semiochemicals to manipulate the behaviour of pest insects beetles were found to have the largest negative impact on and their natural enemies to provide efective control of pests seed yield (Gagic et al. 2016). They can cause signifcant within the crop. These innovative tools usually require fewer feeding damage to the developing fower buds which can inputs and can involve multiple elements, therefore reduc- result in blind stalks, thereby preventing the growth of pods, ing the likelihood of resistance developing compared with leading to large economic losses (Hansen 2004; Zlof 2008). use of synthetic toxicants. We review here the life cycle of Pyrethroid insecticides have been the main control option for the pollen beetle Brassicogethes aeneus (previously known pollen beetles for over 20 years.
    [Show full text]