U.S. Army Military History Institute Censorship 950 Soldiers Drive Carlisle Barracks, PA 17013-5021 25 Mar 2011

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

U.S. Army Military History Institute Censorship 950 Soldiers Drive Carlisle Barracks, PA 17013-5021 25 Mar 2011 U.S. Army Military History Institute Censorship 950 Soldiers Drive Carlisle Barracks, PA 17013-5021 25 Mar 2011 CENSORSHIP: MEDIA, POSTAL & PERSONAL A Working Bibliography of MHI Sources CONTENTS General Sources.....p.1 Pre 20th Century.….p.2 WW I.....p.2 WW II: -General Sources…..p.4 -Note on Diaries…..p.6 Korean War…..p.6 Vietnam.....p.7 Since 1972…..p.7 GENERAL SOURCES Dupuy, Trevor N., ed-in-chief. International Military and Defense Encyclopedia. 6 vols. Wash, DC: Brassey's, 1993. pp.457-60. U24.I58. Dye, John W. “Censorship: An Old Concept with New Problems.” AWC student paper, 1987. 38 p. Arch. Ferber, Martin M. Management and Censorship Issues of Stars and Stripes: Statement of…Director, Manpower and Logistics Issues, National Security and International Affairs Division Before the Subcommittee on Readiness… Wash, DC: GAO, 1989. 13 p. UZ316.F37. Grossman, Patricia A. “The Future of Field Press Censorship: Is There One?” AWC student paper, 1989. 49 p. Arch. Lowenstein, Ralph L. "Military Press Censorship in Israel." Military Review (Feb 1950): pp. 3-9. Per. Scott, Engle W., & Taylor, Thomas C. “Trust and Confidence in Wartime Between Commanders and the Media: Are they Related to Field Press Censorship?” AWC student paper, 1982. 39 p. Arch. U.S. Army General School. History of U.S Censorship, I-6700. n.p., 1950. UH703.H56. And 13-page revised edition, D769.8.C4.W37. Censorship p.2 U.S. Army. Hawaiian Dept. Gen. Staff, G-2. “Plan for Censorship, Including Publicity and Propaganda.” Directive w/ enclosures, 1 Oct 1938. ca 50 p. UH84.G79. See also: -Bibliographies on Journalism, Postal & Psychological Operations/Propaganda PRE-20TH CENTURY Wilson, Quintus C. “A Study and Evaluation of the Military Censorship in the Civil War.” MA thesis, U MN, 1946. 292 p. E609.W54Microfilm. WORLD WAR I Banning, Kendall, Military Censorship of Pictures in World I. Pamphlet, 1920's ? 26 p. D632.B35. Creel, George. How We Advertised America. NY: Harper, 1920. 406 p. D632.C7. Fewster, Kevin. "The Operation of State Apparatuses in Times of Crisis: Censorship and Conscription, 1916." War and Society (May 1985): pp. 37-54. Per. Great Britain. Army. Censorship Orders for Troops in the Field: American Expeditionary Force. Printed in France. 12 p. UB253.A334. The Mails as a German War Weapon: Memorandum on the Censorship of Mails Carried by Neutral Ships. London: Eyre & Spottiswoode, 1916. 24 p. D631.M34. Mock, James R. Censorship 1917. NJ: Princeton, 1941. 250 p. D632.M6. See notably pp. 96-103. _____, & Larson, Cedric. Words That Won the War: The Story of the Committee on Public Information, 1917-1919. NJ: Princeton U, 1939. 372 p. D632.M34. Mulcrone, Michael P. "The World War I Censorship of the Irish-American Press." PhD dss, U WA, 1993. 362 p. D632.M84. Sweeney, Walter C. Military Intelligence: A New Weapon in War. NY: Stokes, 1924. 259 p. UB250.S93. See Chap XI. Censorship p.3 U.S. Army. American Expeditionary Forces. "General Orders No 3, 28 June 1917", pp. 3-10. "G.O. 5, 1 July 1917", pp. 10-11. "G.O. 13, 13 July 1917", pp. 27-34. In U.S. Army in the World War, 1917-1919. Vol. 16. Wash, DC: GPO, 1948. D570.A1.A4. Mail censorship. _____. General Staff (G-2). Report of the activities of the Intelligence Service. Typescript, 15 Jun 1919. pp. 11-13. UB253.U6.A4. _____. Regulations for the Intelligence Section of the General Staff. France, 21 Oct 1918. 62 p. UB253.A33. _____. "Intelligence Regulations, 1920." Wash, DC, 1920. ca 125 p. UB253.A33. _____. Intell Sec. Instructions for Regimental Intelligence Service. France, Dec 1917. 30 p. UB253.A331. _____. Intelligence and Its Relation to the Air Service. Chaumont, France, 1 Jun 1918. 15 p. UB253.A23. U.S. Committee on Public Information. Preliminary Statement to the Press of the United States. Pamphlet, 1917. 20 p. D632.U54. U.S. Dept of Army. Historical Division. United States Army in the World War, 1917-1919: Reports of Commander-in-Chief, A.E.F., Staff Sections and Services. Wash, DC: GPO, 1948. pp. 81-90. D570.A4.U54v13. U.S. Dept of State. Diplomatic Correspondence with Belligerent Governments Relating to Neutral Rights and Commerce. Wash, DC: GPO, 1915. 198 p. D619.A4. See Sect VIII, “Censorship of Telegrams Transmitted by Cable & Wireless.” U.S. Military Attache, Petrograd, Russia. Trans of "Temporary Rules of Military Censorship." Typescript, 25 Nov 1914. 14 p. U15.A2Tr.2817pt3. U.S. War Dept. Military Intelligence Branch. "Provisional Intelligence Manual." Wash, DC, 1917. 49 p. UB253.A332. Intended for the AEF; see pp. 24-27. See also: -Bibliographies on the US Home Front in World War I. Censorship p.4 WORLD WAR II ERA-General Sources Allied Expeditionary Force. Supreme Headquarters. A History of Field Press Censorship in SHAEF: World War II. Paramus, NY: 201st Field Press Censorship Org, 1953? 123 p. D798.A52. Arnold, Bryan C. "Military Censorship: A Guide to Sensible Censoring." Field Artillery Journal (Jun 1943): pp. 437-39. Per. Personal correspondence. Berg, Thomas H. “Silence Speeds Victory: The History of the United States Office of Censorship, 1941-1945.” PhD dss, U NE, 1999. 320 p. D799.U6.B47. Corderman Collection. Includes: -Report on U.S. postal censorship, 1942. -Journal on postal censorship, 3 Jan 1941-31 Dec 1942. -Planning and operations: postal & wire censorship, 1941-42. -Speech by C.G. des Graz, 14 Sep 1942, to Censorship School. -Corderman's speech, Apr 1942, to Board of Econ Warfare. -Languages and dialects translated at censorship stations. -Territory assignments of postal censorship stations. -Forms used in postal censorship stations. -POW letter forms (4). -Notes on British censorship. -Censorship regulations, various eds. -Censorship Hearings, U.S. Senate, 12 Dec 1942. -Report on the Office of Censorship, 15 Nov 1945. -Manual of policy directives, Office of The Chief Postal Censor. -Postal censorship rules and regulations, 1941-1942. Davis, Elmer H. War Information and Censorship. Wash, DC: American Council on Public Affairs, 1945-50? 79 p. D799.U6.D3. Forde, H.M. "Strategic Censorship in World War II." Military Review (Sep 1948): pp. 33-36. Per. Hartenian, Lawrence R. "Propaganda and the Control of Information in Occupied Germany: The U.S. Information Control Division at Radio Frankfurt, 1945-1949." 2 vols. PhD dss, Rutgers, 1984. D802.G3.H37. Hilvert, John. Blue Pencil Warriors: Censorship and Propaganda in World War II. Queensland, Australia: U Queensland, 1984. 258 p. D810.P7.A84. Australia's Dept of Info, 1939-50. "History of United States and Supreme Headquarters, AEF, Press Censorship in the European Theater of Operations, 1942-1945." Repro typescript, Jul 1945. 312 p. in 2 pts. D799.U6.H56. Censorship p.5 Kesaris, Paul. “History of the Office of Censorship.” 3 reels. Wash, DC: UPS, 1977. D799.U6.H57Microfilm. See printed guide. Koop, Theodore, F. Weapon of Silence. Chicago: U Chicago, 1946. 304 p. D799.U6.K6. Pogue, Forrest C. The Supreme Command. Wash, DC: OCMH, 1954. pp. 519-28. D769.A533v3pt4. "SHAEF and the Press, June 1944-May 1945." Powell, Richard P. "Nobody Loves a Censor." Infantry Journal (Mar 1946): pp. 17---20. Per. Mail censorship within units. Roberts, Van Thomas. “Censorship and Propaganda in the Warner Brothers War Films of World War II, 1942-1945.” PhD dss, MS, 2006. 356 p. D743.23.R63. Roeder, George H. The Censored War: American Visual Experience During World War Two. New Haven, CT: Yale, 1993. 189 p. D810.P7.U47. Sawyer, Bickford E., Jr. "The Normandy Campaign From Military and Press Sources." MA thesis, U MO, 1957. 221 p. D756.5.N6.S28. Compares & analyzes official campaign history against civilian press syndicates' accounts and those of 3 noted journalists. Silbar, Howard I. Papers. Arch. Includes experiences as a press censor, SHAEF & 12th Army Group. Sweeney, Michael S. “Byron Price and the Office of Censorship’s Press and Broadcasting Divisions in World War II.” PhD dss, OH State, 1996. 733 p. D799.U6.S94. Summers, Robert E. Wartime Censorship of Press and Radio. NY: Wilson, 1942. 297 p. D799.U6.S8. U.S. Army. European Command. Censorship. Frankfurt, Germany: EUCOM, 1947. 41 p. D802.A1.1945-46.C462. _____. Ground General School. U.S. Army Civil Censorship Operations in Italy During World War II: Special Text No. 11, dated 18 Jun 1949. 56 p. D799.U6.U6. _____. Hawaiian Dept. G-2. “G-2 Plan for Mail Censorship (for Chief of Mail Censorship Section.)” n.p., 1938. UH84.H3.G79. U.S. Far East Command. Military Intelligence Section. Operations of Military and Civil Censorship USAFFE/SWPA/AFPAC/FEC. Tokyo, 1950? 221 p. D810.S7.I59v10. U.S. Office of Censorship. A Report on The Office of Censorship. Wash DC: GPO, 1945. 54 p. D799.U6.U54. _____. Code of Wartime Practices For The American Press. Pamphlet, 1943. 16 p. D799.U6.C62. Censorship p.6 U.S. War Dept. Military Censorship: Training Circular 15, dated Feb 1943. 31 p. MilPub-TC. Mail censorship. _____. Military Intelligence, Counterintelligence: Field Manual 30-25, dated Feb 1940. With 2 changes. 33 p. MilPub-FM. See pp. 17-30 on mail censorship. _____. Prisoner of War Censorship: Military Intelligence: Technical Manual 30-236, dated Oct 1946. 13 p. MilPub-TM. Mail censorship. Washburn, Patrick S. A Question of Sedition: The Federal Government's Investigation of the Black Press During World War II. NY: Oxford, 1986. 296 p. D799.U6.W37. WORLD WAR II ERA-Personal Wartime Diaries A search for any World War II diary prohibition uncovered no War Dept regulation, order or circular specifically on the subject. However, the War Dept's Basic Field Manual, Military Intelligence, Counter- intelligence: FM 30-25 (15 Feb 1940), which remained in force throughout the war, did cover personal diaries.
Recommended publications
  • How Early Post Office Policy Shaped Modern First Amendment Doctrine
    Hastings Law Journal Volume 58 | Issue 4 Article 1 1-2007 The rT ansformation of Statutes into Constitutional Law: How Early Post Officeolic P y Shaped Modern First Amendment Doctrine Anuj C. Desai Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Anuj C. Desai, The Transformation of Statutes into Constitutional Law: How Early Post Officeo P licy Shaped Modern First Amendment Doctrine, 58 Hastings L.J. 671 (2007). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal/vol58/iss4/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings Law Journal by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Articles The Transformation of Statutes into Constitutional Law: How Early Post Office Policy Shaped Modern First Amendment Doctrine ANUJ C. DESAI* INTRODUCTION One of the great urban legends on the Internet was "Bill 6o2P."' In the late 199OS it spread like wildfire, and it occasionally makes the rounds again like pleas from Nigerian officials seeking help with their Swiss bank accounts or the story of the $250 Neiman Marcus cookie recipe. The bill, supported by (no doubt soon-to-be-defeated) "Congressman Tony Schnell," would have imposed a five cent tax on each e-mail message. One would be hard put to imagine a more nefarious way for * Assistant Professor, University of Wisconsin Law School. Many people read all or large parts of this Article and provided helpful suggestions.
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Seamen in World War I Prison Camps in Germany1
    Südasien-Chronik - South Asia Chronicle 5/2015, S. 63-91 © Südasien-Seminar der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin ISBN: 978-3-86004-316-5 Indian Seamen in World War I Prison Camps in Germany1 FRANZISKA ROY [email protected] This article deals with the experiences of internment, camp life, and work in the labour corps of Indian civilian prisoners of war in Germany during the First World War. We still do not know exactly how many civilian colonial prisoners were interned during the war, but the number of Indians among them exceeded 860 out of a total 2.5 million prisoners approximately in German camps (Oltmer 2006: 68; Davis 1977: 623). This may seem like an almost negligible number in terms of quantity but a study of these men can enrich our understanding of 63 the German ‘campscapes’ and of the structures that were constitutive in forming the experiences that Indian prisoners communicated to those outside the camps during and after the war.2 Among these are the shifting hierarchies and networks in the camps, the tension between German expectations of prisoners’ behaviour and their own life worlds, as well as their conscious adaptation to and subversion of German official knowledge about them. In the Great War as the first ‘total war’, propaganda played an important role, and technical advancements such as the advent of the cinema and cheap reproduction of photographs accelerated the propa- ganda war. Internally, many warring states endeavoured to influence their prisoners in some way, especially those from colonial back- grounds or ethnic minorities. For instance, while Germany publicly decried France’s and Britain’s supposed crime against civilisation by letting non-white, barbaric “half-monkeys” or “dogs” fight ‘white men’, it attempted to win over these colonial prisoners at the same time (Koller 2001: 101-24).
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Army Morale, Discipline and Surveillance in the Second World War, 1939-1945
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Graduate Studies The Vault: Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2015-09-29 Medicine and Obedience: Canadian Army Morale, Discipline and Surveillance in the Second World War, 1939-1945. Pratt, William Pratt, W. (2015). Medicine and Obedience: Canadian Army Morale, Discipline and Surveillance in the Second World War, 1939-1945. (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Calgary, Calgary, AB. doi:10.11575/PRISM/26871 http://hdl.handle.net/11023/2540 doctoral thesis University of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission. Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca Medicine and Obedience: Canadian Army Morale, Discipline, and Surveillance in the Second World War, 1939-1945. by William John Pratt A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY GRADUATE PROGRAM IN HISTORY CALGARY, ALBERTA SEPTEMBER, 2015 © William John Pratt 2015 Abstract In the Second World War Canadian Army, medicine and discipline were inherently linked in a system of morale surveillance. The Army used a wide range of tools to monitor morale on medical lines. A basic function of Canadian medical officers was to keep units and formations up to strength, not only by attending to their basic health, but also by scrutinizing ailments under suspicion of malingering.
    [Show full text]
  • 136 Galison and May, Part I
    THE REVELATION OF SECRETS: PETER GALISON AND JOHN MAY ON ARTIFACTS OF SURVEILLANCE Editors’ note: On May 15, 2014, Peter Galison and John May were invited to bring arti- facts of “scandal and surveillance” to a 5th floor conference room in MIT’s Stata Center. Galison and May presented their chosen artifacts, which served as a jumping off point, in Part I. The conversation that followed is in Part II. 136 Galison and May, Part I Downloaded from http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/thld_a_00064 by guest on 01 October 2021 PART I Galison and May, Part I 137 Downloaded from http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/thld_a_00064 by guest on 01 October 2021 Nexus/Global Entry identification card JOHN MAY: I’ll begin with my “Nexus/Global Entry” identification card. When I began traveling regularly from Los Angeles for my visiting position in Toronto, I suddenly found myself standing in customs lines twice a week, for long and often very unpredictable waits, which seemed to vary with the number of border patrol agents the United States had decided to employ on any given evening. I would always, out of the corner of my eye, see the Nexus lane businessmen passing through with ease, waiting only the few seconds required for an automated retinal scan at a kiosk. Being a good student of Foucault I was very wary of, and very aware of, the bio- political implications of lending my retinal biometrics to what I assume is a private contractor that operates the Global Entry and Nexus systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Postal History Journal
    Postal History Journal NUMBER 156 OCTOBER 2013 P OSTAL H ISTORY J OURNAL, N O. 156, O CTOBER 2013 King George V Coronation Day Mail Quack Electro-Magnetic Medicine Southern Newspapers in the United States Mail, 1830s and in The Confederate States of America Now is the right time to consider selling your specialized collection. Kelleher is proud to have countless bidders and buyers in every conceivable philatelic specialty throughout the world—you name it. There’s no beer place to sell your specialized collection. Count on Kelleher to help you. Quite frankly, there is no beer source in the world for every form of worldwide postal history. And because of this—as one might expect— there is no beer venue in the world for you when it comes time to sell your cherished collection. Daniel F. Kelleher Auctions, LLC America’s Oldest Philatelic Auction House • Established 1885 60 Newtown Road., PMB #44 Danbury, CT 06810 USA +203.297.6056 • Fax: +203.297.6059 [email protected] www.kelleherauctions.com Postal History Journal Published by the Postal History Society APS Affiliate No. 44 issued February, June, October. Annual dues $35 U.S., $40 Canada and Mexico, $50 rest of world, P.O. Box 20387, Columbus OH 43220, U.S.A. www.postalhistorysociety.org For this journal, the editors have been awarded the American Philatelic Congress Diane D. Boehret Award 2004; gold medal & Prix d’Honneur, Canada’s 7th National Philatelic Literature Exhibition 2005; Grand Award Colopex 2005; gold medals Napex 2009, Colopex 2007, APS Stampshow 2009, Chicagopex 2011. NUMBER 156 ISSN 0032-5341 OCTOBER 2013 Editors: Diane DeBlois & Robert Dalton Harris, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • 2499 Prelims 7/4/03 2:40 Pm Page I
    Atkin 2 colours 30/4/03 4:54 pm Page 1 It is widely assumed that the French in the Cover illustration: A French soldier and two of his British Isles during the Second World War comrades, coming from Dunkirk, receive a snack THE were fully-fledged supporters of General after landing in Great Britain, 1940. Courtesy of Photos12.com – Oasis de Gaulle, and that across the channel at FORGOTTEN least, the French were a ‘nation of THE ATKIN resisters’. This highly provocative study reveals that most exiles were on British FORGOTTEN FRENCH soil by chance rather than by design, and Exiles in the British Isles, 1940-44 many were not sure whether to stay. FRENCH Overlooked by historians, who have Exiles in the British Isles, 1940-44 concentrated on the ‘Free French’ of de Gaulle, these were the ‘Forgotten French’: The forgotten French refugees swept off the beaches of Dunkirk; servicemen held in camps after the Franco-German armistice; Vichy consular officials left to cater for their compatriots; and a sizeable colonist community based mainly in London. This is a really interesting and important work, which will Drawing on little-known archival sources, this study examines the hopes and fears of be of interest to scholars of twentieth-century Britain and these communities who were bitterly France because it throws light on so many other issues. divided among themselves, some being attracted to Pétain as much as to de Dr Richard Vinen, King’s College, London Gaulle. It also looks at how they fitted into British life and how the British in turn responded.
    [Show full text]
  • The American Legion Monthly [Volume 18, No. 3 (March 1935)]
    rDhis (ZMonth — KARL W. DETZER * Rupert Hughes Marquis James ' How Can I—a Business Man— Really Learn Law at Home? are not alone in asking that question, etc. Their names and addresses are readily own individual needs. You study under a defi- YOUPractically every man has seen where available for your direct investigation. nite, clear-cut plan involving continual use of knowledge of law would have helped his Second: Out of this twenty-four years' ex- tne Problem Method, dealing with actual legal success. The entire structure of business is held perience in training so many individuals in problems. Thus you learn by actually handling together by contracts and legal relations—and sucn varying conditions, LaSalle naturally has le 8a l problems, analyzing cases, and making the man who knows law has a distinct advan- worked out, and perfected, the material and definite legal decisions—not by merely memo- tage—for himself and his firm. methods of 'teaching law by home study. We rizing rules. You will find it fascinating and Again, countless occasions arise outside of have had to meet, and solve, every possible practical—dealing with many of your own the office—rental leases, life insurance, inheri- problem. No matter what your situation, your problems. tance questions, domestic affairs, taxes and handicap, your education, your needs and de- Fifth: In certain permitted states, each year, trust agreements are but a few—on each of sires, etc.—we have already trained success- LaSalle trained men pass the bar examinations which you may stand to lose unless you know fully some man in similar circumstances.
    [Show full text]
  • U. S. Censorship Regulations
    '- ' \... \.... GOVT PU.dLS D&l' t·~ Y\·'\ (.. \ 4; ~ ~""'\ .,_ UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT OFFICE OF CENSOUSIIIP WASHINGTON, D. C . • U. S. CENSORSHIP REGULATIONS EDITION OF JANUARY 30, 1943 UNITED STATES GOVERNME!\'T PRINTING OFF ICE WASHINGTON , 1943 r. U.S. CENSORSIDP REGULATIONS Edition of January 30, 19!3 These regulations supersede U. S. Cable and Radio Censorship Regu­ lations and U. S. Radiotelephone Censorship Regulations of February 19, 1942, and U. S. Postal Censorship Regulations of March 13, 1942, and April13, 1942, all of which are hereby revoked. I ssued under the authority vested in the Director of Censorship J.mrsunnt to section 3 (c) of the Trading with the Enemy Act oi October 6, 1917 ( 40 Stat. 412), as amended; section 303 of the First War P o,...-ers Act of December 18, 19!1 (55 Stat. 838); Executive Order 8985 (6 F. R. 6625); Treasury Decision 50536 (6 F. R. 6807). I 1. SCOPE OF REGULATIONS These regulations pertain to all communications passing between the United States, its territories or possessions, and any foreign country, or which m ~ty be carried by any vessel or other means of transportation touching at any port, place, possession, or territory . of the United States and bound to or from any foreign country. 2. DEFINITIONS As used in these regulations, (a) The term "communication" shall include any letter or other writing, book, map, plan, or other paper, picture, sound recording or other reproduction, telegram, cablegram, wireless message, telephone I conversation either by landlines or radiotelephone circuits, or any message transmitted by any signaling device, carrier pigeon, by word of mouth, or by any other means.
    [Show full text]
  • Connections Between Civilian and Military Dissidence During the French Crisis of 1917 by Cora J
    “The Worst Winds of Revolt”: Connections Between Civilian and Military Dissidence During the French Crisis of 1917 by Cora Jackson Bachelor of Arts, University of New Brunswick, 2018 A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the Graduate Academic Unit of History Supervisor: Sean Kennedy, PhD, History Examining Board: Sarah-Jane Corke, PhD, History, Chair Lisa M. Todd, PhD, History Matthew Sears, PhD, Classics and Ancient History This thesis is accepted by the Dean of Graduate Studies THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK May 2020 ©Cora Jackson, 2020 ABSTRACT This thesis, rooted in the fields of social, cultural, and military history, examines connections and correlations between civilian and military dissidence during the French Crisis of 1917. Previous studies on the Crisis have isolated moments of unrest on the home-front from those occurring on the Western Front, which has in turn created a significant gap in historiography and in popular memory. This research seeks to complicate the narrative of the Crisis by connecting mutinies in the French Army on the Western Front to labour actions at home, arguing that both movements are key to a better understanding of civil-military relations in France during the Great War. This thesis explores their shared motivations and further analyses the ways in which soldiers and civilians shaped, influenced, and legitimized each other’s dissent in an effort to reclaim their political voice from their war-time state. ii DEDICATION To the strikers and mutineers. Vive la Révolution. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The completion of this thesis is due in large part to all the wonderful people who have supported and encouraged me over the past two years.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sex Side of Civil Liberties: United States V
    University of Chicago Law School Chicago Unbound Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers Working Papers 2012 The exS Side of Civil Liberties: United States v. Dennett nda the Changing Face of Free Speech Laura Weinrib Follow this and additional works at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/ public_law_and_legal_theory Part of the Law Commons Chicago Unbound includes both works in progress and final versions of articles. Please be aware that a more recent version of this article may be available on Chicago Unbound, SSRN or elsewhere. Recommended Citation Laura Weinrib, "The exS Side of Civil Liberties: United States v. Dennett nda the Changing Face of Free Speech" (University of Chicago Public Law & Legal Theory Working Paper No. 385, 2012). This Working Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Working Papers at Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers by an authorized administrator of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Sex Side of Civil Liberties: United States v. Dennett and the Changing Face of Free Speech LAURA M. WEINRIB It was the policy of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) during the 1920s to contest only those obscenity regulations that were “relied upon to punish persons for their political views.”1 So stated a 1928 ACLU bulletin, reiterating a position to which the organization had adhered since its for- mation in 1920. For the majority of the ACLU’s executive board, “political views” encompassed the struggle for control of the government and the economy, but not of the body.
    [Show full text]
  • Paul & Schwartz: Federal Censorship: Obscenity in the Mail
    Michigan Law Review Volume 61 Issue 2 1962 Paul & Schwartz: Federal Censorship: Obscenity in the Mail Harry Kalven Jr. University of Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, First Amendment Commons, Legal History Commons, Legal Writing and Research Commons, and the Legislation Commons Recommended Citation Harry Kalven Jr., Paul & Schwartz: Federal Censorship: Obscenity in the Mail, 61 MICH. L. REV. 414 (1962). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol61/iss2/14 This Book Reviews is brought to you for free and open access by the Michigan Law Review at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Michigan Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 414 MICHIGAN LAW REVIEW [Vol. 61 FEDERAL CENSORSHIP: OBSCENITY IN THE MAIL. By James C. N. Paul and Murray L. Schwartz. New York: Free Press of Glencoe. 1961. Pp. 883. $7.o0. This is in many ways an exemplary piece of contemporary legal scholar­ ship. It is a monograph on a single legal topic. The topic is rich in color and interest and has social significance. And the study was planned as one in depth, approaching the problem along several dimensions by paral- 1962] RECENT BooKS 415 leling a survey of legal doctrine with a close look at legislative history,1 and with a close look too at the law in actual operation. This last in particular has required use of the research techniques of the field study, and among other things, the book may well be viewed as a substantial addition to the new and growing literature of empirical legal studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Freud, Censorship and the Re-Territorialization of Mind
    BJHS 45(2): 235–266, June 2012. © The Author(s) (2012) Published by The British Society for the History of Science and Cambridge University Press doi:10.1017/S000708741200009X Blacked-out spaces: Freud, censorship and the re-territorialization of mind PETER GALISON* Abstract. Freud’s analogies were legion: hydraulic pipes, military recruitment, magic writing pads. These and some three hundred others took features of the mind and bound them to far-off scenes – the id only very partially resembles an uncontrollable horse, as Freud took pains to note. But there was one relation between psychic and public act that Freud did not delimit in this way: censorship, the process that checked memories and dreams on their way to the conscious. (Freud dubbed the relation between internal and external censorship a ‘parallel’ rather than a limited analogy.) At first, Freud likened this suppression to the blacking out of texts at the Russian frontier. During the First World War, he suffered, and spoke of suffering under, Viennese postal and newspaper censorship – Freud was forced to leave his envelopes unsealed, and to recode or delete content. Over and over, he registered the power of both internal and public censorship in shared form: distortion, anticipatory deletion, softenings, even revision to hide suppression. Political censorship left its mark as the conflict reshaped his view of the psyche into a society on a war footing, with homunculus-like border guards sifting messages as they made their way – or did not – across a topography of mind. Caviar, sex and death Censorship came early and often to Vienna.
    [Show full text]