A Textual Study of Family 1 in the Gospel of John
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
A TEXTUAL STUDY OF FAMILY 1 IN THE GOSPEL OF JOHN by ALISON SARAH WELSBY A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Institute for Textual Scholarship and Electronic Editing College of Arts and Law The University of Birmingham 2011 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Abstract This is a textual study of seventeen Family 1 manuscripts in the Gospel of John: Gregory-Aland 1, 22, 118, 131, 205abs, 205, 209, 565, 872, 884, 1192, 1210, 1278, 1582, 2193, 2372, and 2713. Part 1 contains an analysis of a full collation of these manuscripts in John and concludes with a family stemma that expresses the relationships between the manuscripts and how they connect to the non-extant Family 1 archetype. Part 2 contains a reconstructed Family 1 text with critical apparatus for John. The results of this thesis confirm that 1 and 1582 are leading Family 1 manuscripts in John, but demonstrate that a new subgroup exists, represented by 565, 884 and 2193, that rivals the textual witness of 1 and 1582. This subgroup descends from the Family 1 archetype through a different intermediate ancestor to that shared by 1 and 1582. The discovery of this subgroup has broadened the textual contours of Family 1, leading to many new readings, both text and marginal, that should be considered Family 1 readings. The reconstructed text is based on the witness of this wider textual group and is offered as a replacement to Kirsopp Lake’s 1902 text of John. Contents Part One: Analysis of Seventeen Manuscripts in the Gospel of John........................... 1 1. Introduction............................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Rationale............................................................................................................. 1 1.2. Method ............................................................................................................... 4 2. The Core Group: Codices 1, 565, 884, 1582, and 2193 ........................................... 7 2.1. Manuscript Descriptions .................................................................................... 7 2.1.1. Codex 1 ....................................................................................................... 7 2.1.2. Codex 565 ................................................................................................. 11 2.1.3. Codex 884 ................................................................................................. 15 2.1.4. Codex 1582 ............................................................................................... 18 2.1.5. Codex 2193 ............................................................................................... 22 2.2. Textual Analysis............................................................................................... 27 2.2.1. Establishing Textual Relationships ........................................................... 27 2.2.2. Non-Majority Text Agreements................................................................ 28 2.2.3. Evidence from Marginalia......................................................................... 35 2.2.4. Evidence of the Pericope Adulterae .......................................................... 38 2.2.5. Non-Majority Text Correction and Disagreements................................... 40 2.2.6. Family Relationships................................................................................. 42 2.2.7. Codices 565, 884 and 2193 have a Shared Ancestor, B............................ 44 2.2.8. Codices 565, 884 and 2193 are Independent Witnesses of B ................... 45 2.2.9. B is an Independent Witness of A-1.......................................................... 47 2.2.10. B is Independent of All Other Extant Family Manuscripts..................... 51 2.2.11. Codices 1 and 1582 are Independent of One Another ............................ 53 2.2.12. Codices 1 and 1582 Share an Intermediate Exemplar, C........................ 57 2.2.13. New Readings for Family 1 in the Gospel of John ................................. 59 3. The Venice Group: Codices 118, 205abs, 205, 209 and 2713................................ 68 3.1. Manuscript Descriptions .................................................................................. 68 3.1.1. Codex 118 ................................................................................................. 68 3.1.2. Codex 205abs ............................................................................................ 72 3.1.3. Codex 205 ................................................................................................. 77 3.1.4. Codex 209 ................................................................................................. 81 3.1.5. Codex 2713 ............................................................................................... 84 3.2. Textual Analysis............................................................................................... 87 3.2.1. Previous Research ..................................................................................... 87 3.2.2. Family 1 Affinity....................................................................................... 91 3.2.3. Codices 118, 205abs, 205, 209 and 2713 Form a Distinct Subgroup ....... 94 3.2.4. Shared A-1 Readings................................................................................. 95 3.2.5. Exclusive Readings ................................................................................... 96 3.2.6. Shared Shifts in Textual Affinity ............................................................ 101 3.2.7. Explanation of the Textual Shifts in Manuscript E................................. 106 3.2.8. Manuscript E Shares an Intermediate Exemplar with Codex 1 .............. 110 3.2.9. Manuscript E is Independent of Codex 1................................................ 114 3.2.10. Codex 1 and Manuscript E Descend from Manuscript D ..................... 116 3.2.11. Codices 118, 205abs, 209, and 2713 are Independent Witnesses of E . 117 3.2.12. Codex 209 is Independent..................................................................... 117 3.2.13. Codex 118 is Independent..................................................................... 118 3.2.14. Codex 2713 is Independent................................................................... 120 3.2.15. Codices 205abs and 205........................................................................ 120 3.2.16. Codex 205 is a Copy of Codex 205abs ................................................. 122 3.2.17. Codex 205abs is Independent................................................................ 124 3.2.18. Summary of the Venice Group.............................................................. 126 4. A Manuscript Subgroup: Codices 22, 1192, 1210, 1278 and 2372 ...................... 128 4.1. Manuscript Descriptions ................................................................................ 128 4.1.1. Codex 22 ................................................................................................. 128 4.1.2. Codex 1192 ............................................................................................. 131 4.1.3. Codex 1210 ............................................................................................. 134 4.1.4. Two Decorative Style Manuscripts: Codices 1278 and 2372 ................. 136 4.1.5. Codex 1278 ............................................................................................. 138 4.1.6. Codex 2372 ............................................................................................. 143 4.2. Textual Analysis............................................................................................. 146 4.2.1. Previous Research ................................................................................... 146 4.2.2. Family 1 Affinity..................................................................................... 148 4.2.3. Codices 22, 1192, 1210, 1278, 2372 Share an Intermediate Ancestor ... 152 4.2.4. Shared A-1 Readings............................................................................... 152 4.2.5. Exclusive Readings ................................................................................. 154 4.2.6. G is the Intermediate Ancestor of 22, 1192, 1210, 1278 and 2372......... 157 4.2.7. G is an Independent Witness of A-1 ....................................................... 158 4.2.8. Does Manuscript G Descend from Manuscript C or Manuscript B? ...... 158 4.2.9. Codex 22 is an Independent Witness of Manuscript G........................... 159 4.2.10. Codex 1192 is an Independent Witness of Manuscript G..................... 160 4.2.11. Codex 1210 is a Copy of Codex 22....................................................... 161 4.2.12. Codices 1278 and 2372 Descend from an Intermediate Ancestor ........ 167 4.2.13.