DOCSLIB.ORG

Crossing Boundaries: Transforming Stemeducation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Crossing Boundaries: Transforming Stemeducation PROJECT KALEIDOSCOPE Advancing What Works in STEM Education NETWORK FOR ACADEMIC RENEWAL CONFERENCE CROSSING BOUNDARIES: TRANSFORMING STEM EDUCATION Westin Seattle | Seattle, Washington November 12-14, 2015 Dear Colleagues, The Association of American Colleges and Universities (AAC&U) and Project Kaleidoscope (PKAL) welcome you to the Network for Academic Renewal conference Crossing Boundaries: Transforming STEM Education. Over the next few days, we invite you to join with colleagues to examine strategies and practices for addressing the national imperative to produce more competitively trained, liberally educated STEM graduates and ensuring a scientifically literate citizenry. Crossing Boundaries provides an opportunity to share and discuss the kinds of integrative, inclusive, and engaging approaches to teaching and learning that all students need to address the pervasive and multifaceted issues of contemporary life. From public health; to climate change; to water, food, and personal security in the midst of geopolitical instability, the program encourages us to collaborate across disciplines, among all campus sectors, and with community and business partners to truly engage students with real-world issues from multiple perspectives. Scott Page, Leonid Hurwicz Collegiate Professor of Complex Systems, Political Science and Economics at the University of Michigan will set the context for the conference by analyzing the ways in which diversity contributes to—indeed is essential for—a high-quality learning environment. Erika Camacho, Associate Professor of Mathematics and Natural Sciences at Arizona State University will share insights into the ways in which interdisciplinary and applied learning is helping educators and students cross boundaries to make the connections necessary to solve complex problems. And Nancy Cantor will provide strategies and practices for creating inclusive campus cultures that realize the assets that all students bring to college to increase the number of STEM baccalaureate degree earners who master complex STEM content and competencies, and for enhancing STEM literacy for all students. Campus-based research, models, and strategies for change contribute to concurrent sessions, facilitated discussions, and poster presentations, providing points of departure for critiquing the most promising practices in transforming STEM education. Because this achievement is not possible without the commitment of STEM faculty, we thank you for exploring with us the inextricable links among STEM higher education, inclusive excellence, a competitive workforce, and a scientifically- literate citizenry. Kelly Mack Karen Ann Kalla Vice President for Undergraduate STEM Education and Director, Network for Academic Renewal Executive Director of Project Kaleidoscope SPONSORS AAC&U thanks the sponsor below for its generous contribution. Conference sponsors are colleges, universities, associations, nonprofit organizations, and businesses that participate in the program and/or provide financial or in-kind support. Through their contributions, sponsors enhance the conference experience for everyone. Contributing Sponsor EYP is an expertise-based, integrated architecture and engineering design firm that specializes in sustainable design for corporate, government, and higher education clients around the world. EYP Energy is a division of EYP, Inc., that delivers integrated, comprehensive sustainability consulting and implementation services. Located in Albany, Boston, Charlotte, Greenville, New York City, Orlando, Raleigh, and Washington, D.C., the firm is ranked among the largest A/E firms in the nation by Building Design and Construction magazine and has been recognized for sustainable design leadership by Architect Magazine, Engineering News-Record, and Architectural Record. eypaedesign.com/ LEAP FEATURED SESSIONS Liberal Education and America’s Promise Throughout the conference program, sessions noted with the Liberal Education and America’s Promise (LEAP) designation highlight the innovative work of colleges and universities that are members of AAC&U’s LEAP Campus Action Network. The LEAP Campus Action Network brings together campuses and organizations committed to liberal education; helps them to improve their efforts to ensure that all students achieve essential liberal education outcomes; and shines a spotlight on educational practices that work. Participants in these sessions will learn how members of the network are using the LEAP framework and resources to advance their educational improvement efforts. For information about LEAP visit www.aacu.org/LEAP. FUTURE NETWORK FOR ACADEMIC RENEWAL CONFERENCES February 18-20, 2016 | New Orleans, Louisiana General Education and Assessment: From My Work to Our Work March 17-19, 2016 | Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Diversity, Learning, and Student Success: Shifting Paradigms and Challenging Mindsets October 6-8, 2016 | Denver, Colorado Global Learning in College November 3-5, 2016 | Boston, Massachusetts Transforming STEM Education For Information about Network for Academic Renewal conferences, please see www.aacu.org/meetings/network or contact Karen Kalla or Jacqueline Martin at 202.387.3760 OPPORTUNITIES TO CONNECT In an effort to provide more networking opportunities for conference participants, we are offering a few ways for you to connect with colleagues both within and outside of conference sessions. Sign-up sheets for lunch and dinner groups, organized by areas of interest will be available in the registration area. You are also invited to join the conversation on Twitter at #aacustem15 CAMPUS CONTRIBUTORS AAC&U extends a special note of appreciation to the individuals and campuses listed below for their many contributions to the conference program. Bellevue College Portland State University M. Gita Bangera Gwen Shusterman Dean, Undergraduate Research Associate Professor of Chemistry Jennie Mayer Lisa Weasel Physical Sciences Program Chair/Chemistry Instructor Associate Professor Eastern Washington University Seattle University Judd Case Bill Ehmann Dean of the College of Science, Technology, Engineering, Associate Provost for Research and Graduate Education Math Allison Henrich Associate Professor and Chair, Mathematics Department Edmonds Community College Jenny McFarland Jennifer Loertscher Biology Instructor Assistant Professor of Chemistry Gonzaga University University of Idaho Catherine Cronin Gary Williams Project Coordinator Professor of English Joanne Smieja University of Nevada-Las Vegas Professor of Chemistry William Speer Heritage University Director, Math Learning Center Dustin Shattuck University of Oregon Title V STEM Grant Director Elly Vandegrift Lane Community College Associate Director, Science Literacy Program Sarah Ulerick University of Portland Dean, Science Division Jacquie Van Hoomissen Lewis & Clark College Associate Professor of Biology and Department Chair Julio De Paula University of Washington - Seattle Professor of Chemistry; Assistant Vice President and Janice DeCosmo Director of Special Project Associate Vice Provost for Undergraduate Research Liza Finkel Stephanie Gardner Associate Professor Director of Luis Stokes Alliance for Minority Participation C. Reiness Kristian Wiles Associate Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences Director, TRiO Student Support Services North Seattle College University of Washington Bothell Ann Murkowski Elaine Scott Biology Faculty, Ready Set Transfer Academy Coordinator Dean and Professor of Engineering Kalyn Owens Chemistry, Math, Science, and Social Science University of Washington Tacoma Campus Bonnie Becker Portland Community College Associate Dean of Curriculum and Academic Initiatives Betsy Julian Bill Kunz Division Dean for Science and Technology Interim Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs Dieterich Steinmetz Division Dean, Science, and Engineering University of Wyoming Western Washington University Gregory Brown Spencer Anthony-Cahill Associate Dean, College of Arts and Sciences Professor of Biochemistry Mark Lyford Joann Otto Director of the Biology Program Professor and Chair, Biology Department Western Oregon University Willamette University Susanne Monahan Mark Stewart Dean, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences Professor of Psychology SCHEDULE AT A GLANCE Thursday, November 12, 2015 10:00 a.m. – 7:00 p.m. Conference Registration and Membership Information 9:30 – 11:00 a.m. Bullitt Center Tour (separate registration required) 2:00 – 5:00 p.m. Pre-conference Workshops (separate registration and fee required) 2:30 – 4:00 p.m. Bullitt Center Tour (separate registration required) 7:00 – 8:15 p.m. Keynote Address │Understanding Complexity: Diversity Matters Scott E. Page—University of Michigan 8:15 – 9:00 p.m. Reception Friday, November 13, 2015 7:30 – 8:00 a.m. Breakfast 8:00 – 9:00 a.m. Concurrent Sessions 9:15 – 10:15 a.m. Plenary │ Meta-analysis Perspectives on Interdisciplinary and Applied Learning Erika T. Camacho—Arizona State University 10:45 – 11:45 a.m. Concurrent Sessions 11:45 a.m. – 1:45 p.m. LEAP Challenge Forum Luncheon: Preparing Students to Create Solutions for Our Future 2:15 – 4:30 p.m. Concurrent Sessions 4:30 – 6:30 p.m. Poster Sessions and Receptions 4:30 – 6:00 p.m. Bullitt Center Tour (separate registration required) Saturday, November 14, 2015 8:00 – 8:30 a.m. Continental Breakfast 8:30 –10:45 a.m. Concurrent Sessions 11:00 a.m. – 12:00 p.m. Closing Plenary │ Examining the Intersections of Equity, Diversity, Community Engagement, and STEM Education Nancy Cantor—Rutgers University-Newark
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Scientific Evidence for Effective Teaching of Reading
    Read About It: Scientific Evidence for Effective Teaching of Reading Kerry Hempenstall Edited by Jennifer Buckingham Research Report | March 2016 National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication Data: Creator: Hempenstall, Kerry, author. Title: Read about it : scientific evidence for effective teaching of reading / Kerry Hempenstall ; edited by Jennifer Buckingham. ISBN: 9781922184610? (paperback) Series: CIS research report ; 11. Subjects: Effective teaching. Early childhood education--Research--Australia. Literacy--Research--Australia. Teacher effectiveness. Other Creators/Contributors: Buckingham, Jennifer, editor. Centre for Independent Studies (Australia), issuing body. Dewey Number: 371.10994 Read About It: Scientific Evidence for Effective Teaching of Reading Kerry Hempenstall Edited by Jennifer Buckingham Research Report 11 Related CIS publications Research Report RR9 Jennifer Buckingham and Trisha Jha, One School Does Not Fit All (2016) Policy Magazine Spring Issue Jennifer Buckingham, Kevin Wheldall and Robyn Beaman-Wheldall, ‘Why Jaydon can’t read: The triumph of ideology over evidence in teaching reading’ (2013) Contents Executive Summary ...............................................................................................1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................3 The power of improved instruction ...................................................................4 Effective, evidence-based reading instruction: The five ‘keys’
    [Show full text]
  • The Effectiveness of Using Discovery Learning Method in Teaching Writing Skill Viewed from the Students' Creativity
    THE EFFECTIVENESS OF USING DISCOVERY LEARNING METHOD IN TEACHING WRITING SKILL VIEWED FROM THE STUDENTS’ CREATIVITY (An Experimental Study at the Tenth Grade Students of SMAN 1 Durenan Trenggalek in the Academic Year of 2014/2015) Thesis Written to Fulfill One of the Requirements to Obtain the Graduate Degree in English Education Written by: Ringgi Candraning Prawerti S 891302037 ENGLISH EDUCATION DEPARTMENT GRADUATE SCHOOL SEBELAS MARET UNIVERSITY SURAKARTA 2014 i APPROVAL THE EFFECTIVENESS OF USING DISCOVERY LEARNING METHOD IN TEACHING WRITING SKILL VIEWED FROM THE STUDENTS’ CREATIVITY (An Experimental Study at the Tenth Grade Students of SMAN 1 Durenan Trenggalek in the Academic Year of 2014/2015) By RINGGI CANDRANING PRAWERTI S891302037 This Thesis has been approved by the consultants of English Education Department Graduate School of Teachers’ Training and Education Faculty of Sebelas Maret University Surakarta in 2014, First consultant, Second consultant, Dr. Ngadiso, M. Pd. Dra. Diah Kristina, M. A, Ph. D NIP. 19621231 198803 1 009 NIP. 19590505 198601 2 001 Approved by The Head of English Education Department Graduate School of Teachers’ Training and Education Faculty of Sebelas Maret University Dr. Abdul Asib, M. Pd NIP. 19520307 198003 1 005 ii LEGITIMATION FROM THE BOARD OF EXAMINERS THE EFFECTIVENESS OF USING DISCOVERY LEARNING METHOD IN TEACHING WRITING SKILL VIEWED FROM THE STUDENTS’ CREATIVITYM By RINGGI CANDRANING PRAWERTI S891302037 This Thesis has been examined by the Board of Thesis Examiners of English Education Department of Teachers Training and Education Faculty of Graduate School of Sebelas Maret University Surakarta on ….., …… Board of Examiners Chairperson : Dr. Abdul Asib, M.
    [Show full text]
  • Discovery Learning and Discovery Teaching David Hammer Version of Record First Published: 14 Dec 2009
    This article was downloaded by: [SDSU San Diego State University] On: 08 August 2012, At: 09:46 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Cognition and Instruction Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/hcgi20 Discovery Learning and Discovery Teaching David Hammer Version of record first published: 14 Dec 2009 To cite this article: David Hammer (1997): Discovery Learning and Discovery Teaching, Cognition and Instruction, 15:4, 485-529 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1504_2 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae, and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this
    [Show full text]
  • Experiences in Self-Determined Learning
    Lisa Blaschke, Chris Kenyon & Stewart Hase (Eds.) Experiences in Self-determinded Learning Copyright © 2014 Lisa Marie Blaschke, Chris Kenyon and Stewart Hase All rights reserved. ISBN: 1502785307 ISBN-13: 978-1502785305 DEDICATION To all the children throughout the world who deserve the best education All proceeds from the sale of this book will be donated to educating children in Africa through Buy1 Give1 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Thanks to all the contributors who freely gave of their time, effort and knowledge to enable this book Thanks to Amanda Nelson for the cover design A note on spelling: Contributors to this book come from several different countries and use different versions of the English language. The original spelling of a contributor’s work has been unchanged in order to retain the integrity of the work. CONTENTS Biographies ........................................................................ 6 Introduction ...................................................................... 10 The Basics ........................................................................ 14 1 An Introduction to Self-determined Learning (Heutagogy) ............................................................... 15 2 Heutagogy and Systems Thinking: A Perfect Marriage for Conducting Learning Experiences ....... 31 The Learners ..................................................................... 41 3 Embracing Opportunities for Self-directed Learning in Formal Learning Environments .............. 42 4 Moving Students Forward in the PAH Continuum: Maximizing
    [Show full text]
  • Enhancing Students' Motivation and Problem Solving Skills in Mathematics Using Guided Discovery Learning
    Universal Journal of Educational Research 8(12): 6783-6789, 2020 http://www.hrpub.org DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2020.081244 Enhancing Students' Motivation and Problem Solving Skills in Mathematics Using Guided Discovery Learning Tanti Diyah Rahmawati1, Dwi Sulisworo2,*, Erwin Prasetyo3 1Department of Mathematics Education, IKIP Muhammadiyah Maumere, Sikka, Indonesia 2Department of Physics Education, Ahmad Dahlan University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia 3Department of Physics Education, IKIP Muhammadiyah Maumere, Sikka, Indonesia Received August 13, 2020; Revised August 17, 2020; Accepted November 12, 2020 Cite This Paper in the following Citation Styles (a): [1] Tanti Diyah Rahmawati, Dwi Sulisworo, Erwin Prasetyo , "Enhancing Students' Motivation and Problem Solving Skills in Mathematics Using Guided Discovery Learning," Universal Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 8, No. 12, pp. 6783 - 6789, 2020. DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2020.081244. (b): Tanti Diyah Rahmawati, Dwi Sulisworo, Erwin Prasetyo (2020). Enhancing Students' Motivation and Problem Solving Skills in Mathematics Using Guided Discovery Learning. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(12), 6783 - 6789. DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2020.081244. Copyright©2020 by authors, all rights reserved. Authors agree that this article remains permanently open access under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License Abstract Guided discovery learning is one of the Ability, Mathematics, Guided Discovery, Learning learning models that focus on students. This model is one Strategy, Learning Environment, Learning Innovation, of the recommended models for implementing the 2013 Learning Satisfaction Curriculum as a foundation for education reform in Indonesia. It's just that the internalization of teachers in the learning models that focus on students still needs to be improved.
    [Show full text]
  • Inquiry-Based Learning Literature Review
    INQUIRY-BASED LEARNING LITERATURE REVIEW Inquiry-Based Learning: A Review of the Research Literature Dr. Sharon Friesen Galileo Educational Network, University of Calgary David Scott University of Calgary Paper prepared for the Alberta Ministry of Education June 2013 INQUIRY-BASED LEARNING LITERATURE REVIEW 2 Introduction A growing body of research suggests that models of education designed to meet the needs of the industrial past are inadequate for the myriad challenges and opportunities facing 21st century students (Alberta Education, 2010; Barron & Darling-Hammond, 2008; Friesen & Jardine, 2009; Perkins, 2009). New educational environments require different ways of designing learning experiences for students as well as new approaches to teaching and assessment. The call for educational reform away from passive transmission-based learning and the imparting of discrete skills and processes is not new. Institutions of education around the world are reconsidering some of their most deeply-held assumptions about how they conceptualize learning and to what end education should be directed. This shift in thinking has been prominent in Alberta. Subject-specific programs of study and the Ministry of Education’s Inspiring Education (2010) document to guide education in Alberta to 2030 call for a vision of education that will prepare young people for the shifting economic, technological, and socio-political realities of the 21st century. Through fostering intellectual engagement, an entrepreneurial spirit, and the dispositions of ethical citizenship, the vision for education outlined in the Inspiring Education document advocates that students develop competencies through a process of inquiry and discovery. Students would collaborate to create new knowledge while also learning how to “think critically and creatively, and how to make discoveries—through inquiry, reflection, exploration, experimentation, and trial and error” (Alberta Education, 2010, p.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dramatic Impact of Explicit Instruction on Learning to Read in A
    PSSXXX10.1177/0956797620968790Rastle et al.The Dramatic Impact of Explicit Instruction 968790research-article2021 ASSOCIATION FOR Research Article PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Psychological Science 1 –14 The Dramatic Impact of Explicit © The Author(s) 2021 Instruction on Learning to Read Article reuse guidelines: sagepub.com/journals-permissions in a New Writing System DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620968790 10.1177/0956797620968790 www.psychologicalscience.org/PS Kathleen Rastle1 , Clare Lally1 , Matthew H. Davis2 , and J. S. H. Taylor3 1Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London; 2MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge; and 3Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London Abstract There is profound and long-standing debate over the role of explicit instruction in reading acquisition. In this research, we investigated the impact of teaching regularities in the writing system explicitly rather than relying on learners to discover these regularities through text experience alone. Over 10 days, 48 adults learned to read novel words printed in two artificial writing systems. One group learned spelling-to-sound and spelling-to-meaning regularities solely through experience with the novel words, whereas the other group received a brief session of explicit instruction on these regularities before training commenced. Results showed that virtually all participants who received instruction performed at ceiling on tests that probed generalization of underlying regularities. In contrast,
    [Show full text]
  • The Development and Improvement of Instructions
    INVESTIGATING ONE SCIENCE TEACHER’S INQUIRY UNIT THROUGH AN INTEGRATED ANALYSIS: THE SCIENTIFIC PRACTICES ANALYSIS (SPA)-MAP AND THE MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE CLASSROOM OBSERVATION PROFILE SYSTEM (M-SCOPS) A Dissertation by DAWOON YOO Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY August 2011 Major Subject: Curriculum and Instruction Investigating One Science Teacher’s Inquiry Unit through an Integrated Analysis: The Scientific Practices Analysis (SPA)-Map and the Mathematics and Science Classroom Observation Profile System (M-SCOPS) Copyright 2011 Dawoon Yoo INVESTIGATING ONE SCIENCE TEACHER’S INQUIRY UNIT THROUGH AN INTEGRATED ANALYSIS: THE SCIENTIFIC PRACTICES ANALYSIS (SPA)-MAP AND THE MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE CLASSROOM OBSERVATION PROFILE SYSTEM (M-SCOPS) A Dissertation by DAWOON YOO Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Approved by: Chair of Committee, Carol L. Stuessy Committee Members, Lawrence R. Griffing Cathleen C. Loving Jane F. Schielack Head of Department, Dennie L. Smith August 2011 Major Subject: Curriculum and Instruction iii ABSTRACT Investigating One Science Teacher’s Inquiry Unit through an Integrated Analysis: The Scientific Practices Analysis (SPA)-Map and the Mathematics and Science Classroom Observation Profile System (M-SCOPS). (August 2011) Dawoon Yoo, B.S., Ewha Womans University; M.S., Ewha Womans University Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. Carol L. Stuessy Since the 1950s, inquiry has been considered an effective strategy to promote students’ science learning. However, the use of inquiry in contemporary science classrooms is minimal, despite its long history and wide recognition elsewhere.
    [Show full text]
  • Learning Geometry Through Discovery Learning Using a Scientific Approach
    International Journal of Instruction January 2017 ● Vol.10, No.1 e-ISSN: 1308-1470 ● www.e-iji.net p-ISSN: 1694-609X pp. 55-70 Received: 01/01/2016 Revision: 11/08/2016 Accepted: 15/08/2016 Learning Geometry through Discovery Learning Using a Scientific Approach Akhsanul In’am Mathematics Department University of Muhammadiyah Malang Indonesia, Indonesia, [email protected] Siti Hajar Islamic Junior High School Malang Indonesia, Indonesia, [email protected] The objective of this present research is to analyze the implementation of learning geometry through a scientific learning consisting of three aspects: 1) teacher’s activities, 2) students’ activities and, 3) the achievement results. The adopted approach is a descriptive-quantitative one and the subject is the Class VII students of Islamic Junior High School in Indonesia. The data were obtained through direct observations in order to gain some knowledge of the teacher’s and students’ learning activities. The results of the students’ learning activities were obtained through geometry tests. The research results showed that the teachers were able to implement the preplanned learning activities and their leaning activities may be able to improve the students’ learning activities. Moreover, the five aspects of the scientific approach namely observing, asking questions, reasoning, attempting and presenting, were well implemented. The students’ activities were also done as planned and all the aspects of the learning activities as stated in the approach may said to be well implemented. The mean value of students’ learning results in groups was found to be 96; meanwhile their individual learning result was found to be 95.
    [Show full text]
  • Millions Learning: Scaling up Quality Education in Developing Countries Summary Summary Executive the Developing World
    MILLIONS LEARNING SCALING UP QUALITY EDUCATION IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES Jenny Perlman Robinson and Rebecca Winthrop with Eileen McGivney 1 MILLIONS LEARNING SCALING UP QUALITY EDUCATION IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES Jenny Perlman Robinson and Rebecca Winthrop with Eileen McGivney Table of contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8 FILIPE’S STORY: BRAZIL’S NEW APPROACH TO SCHOOLING IN THE 14 I This report was written by Jenny Perlman Robinson and Rebecca Winthrop with Eileen AMAZON JUNGLE McGivney, along with research support from Jenny Alexander and Priyanka Varma, as well as invaluable assistance over the past few years from the Millions Learning team at the Brookings II ACCELERATED EDUCATION PROGRESS IS URGENTLY NEEDED 20 Institution’s Center for Universal Education, particularly: Lulwah Ayyoub, Mia Blakstad, Zoe Global goals place a premium on learning for all 22 Norris, Priya Shankar, and Samantha Spilka. Where education has failed: The scope and scale of challenges 24 Why focus on learning? 27 Sincere gratitude and appreciation to our Millions Learning consultants who have been equally instrumental in the report: Priscila Cruz, Shushmita Chatterji Dutt, Flavia Goulart, III SCALING SO MILLIONS LEARN: DEFINING A GLOBAL PRIORITY 30 Mayyada Abu Jaber, Haeyeon Jung, Christina Kwauk, Alessia Lefebure, Divya Mansukhani, A focus on scaling 33 Maria May, Jessica Moore, Ainan Nuran, Daniela Petrova, Martin Roeck, Marijke Schouten, Sheikh Islam Tanjeb, Judith-Ann Walker, and Jillian Yoerges. Addressing an evidence gap 33 Defining scaling 35 We are thankful for
    [Show full text]
  • The Many Faces of Inductive Teaching and Learning
    The Many Faces of Inductive By Michael Prince Teaching and Learning and Richard Felder This study examines the effectiveness and implementation of different inductive teaching methods, including inquiry-based learn- ing, problem-based learning, project-based learning, case-based teaching, discovery learning, and just-in-time teaching. cience courses are tradition- chological research that provides strong with a challenge and then learn what ally taught deductively. The support for inductive teaching methods. they need to know to address the instructor first teaches students The literature also demonstrates that challenge. The methods differ in the relevant theory and mathemati- inductive methods encourage students nature and scope of the challenge and Scal models, then moves on to textbook to adopt a deep approach to learning in the amount of guidance students exercises, and eventually—maybe— (Ramsden 2003; Norman and Schmidt receive from their instructor as they gets to real-world applications. Often 1992; Coles 1985) and that the chal- attempt to meet the challenge. the only motivation students have to lenges provided by inductive methods learn the material, beyond grades, is the serve as precursors to intellectual de- Inquiry-based learning vague promise that it will be important velopment (Felder and Brent 2004). In inquiry-based learning (also known later in the curriculum or in their ca- Inductive teaching methods come as inquiry-guided learning or guided reers. Failure to connect course content in many forms, including discovery inquiry), students are presented with to the real world has repeatedly been learning, inquiry-based learning, a challenge (such as a question to be shown to contribute to students leav- problem-based learning, project- answered, an observation or data set ing the sciences (Seymour and Hewitt based learning, case-based teaching, to be interpreted, or a hypothesis to 1997; Kardash and Wallace 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • Cognitive Load Theory: Research That Teachers Really Need to Understand
    SEPTEMBER 2017 Cognitive load theory: Research that teachers really need to understand Centre for Education Statistics and Evaluation Why cognitive load theory? Cognitive load theory emerged from the work of educational psychologist John Sweller and colleagues in the 1980s and To improve student performance, teachers need to understand 1990s (see especially Sweller 1988, 1999). They assert: the evidence base that informs and helps improve their practice. An area of research with significant implications for teaching The implications of working memory limitations on practice is cognitive load theory. Cognitive load theory was instructional design can hardly be overestimated … recently described by British educationalist Dylan Wiliam as ‘the Anything beyond the simplest cognitive activities appear to single most important thing for teachers to know’ (Wiliam 2017). overwhelm working memory. Prima facie, any instructional Grounded in a robust evidence base, cognitive load theory design that flouts or merely ignores working memory provides theoretical and empirical support for explicit models limitations inevitably is deficient. of instruction. Research in cognitive load theory demonstrates (Sweller, van Merrienboer & Paas 1998, pp. 252-253) that instructional techniques are most effective when they Cognitive load theory is based on a number of widely are designed to accord with how human brains learn and accepted theories about how human brains process and store use knowledge. information (Gerjets, Scheiter & Cierniak 2009, p. 44). These This paper describes the research on cognitive load theory and assumptions include: that human memory can be divided into what it means for more effective teaching practice. The first working memory and long-term memory; that information is part of the paper explains how human brains learn according stored in the long-term memory in the form of schemas; and to cognitive load theory, and outlines the evidence base for the that processing new information results in ‘cognitive load’ theory.
    [Show full text]