Mandukya Upanishad & Karika with Shankara Bhashya

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mandukya Upanishad & Karika with Shankara Bhashya “ If the sole object be the attainment of the Highest Truth <the supreme goal of .existence) the single Upanishad of MSndQkya is sufficient.” —Muktlkopanishad. “ The Upanishad (Mandflkya) with the Karik5 embodies in itself the Quintessence of the substance of the entire philosophy of Vedanta.” —Sankara. THE MANDUKYOPANISHAD WITH GAUDAPADA’S KARIKA THE mAndukyopanishad WITH GAUDAPADA’S KARIKA AND SANKARA’S COMMENTARY TRANSLATED AND ANNOTATED BY SWAMI NIKHILANANDA WITH A FOREWORD BY V. SUBRAHMANYA IYER SRI RAMAKR1SHNA ASHRAMA MYSORE 1949 Published by THE PRESIDENT SRI RAMAKRISHNA ASHRAMA MYSORE First EDmoN .. 1936 Second Edition . 1944 Third Edition .. 1949 All Rights Reserved printed at the bangalore press, bangalorb city TO HIS HIGHNESS SRI KRISHNARAJA WADIYAR BAHADUR IV G.C.S.I., G.B.E. Maharaja of Mysore AS A MARK OF THE HIGHEST ESTEEM FOR THE REMARKABLE EXAMPLE HE HAS SET BY HIS UNDEVIATING STEADFASTNESS IN THE PURSUIT OF TRUTH, WHEREVER FOUND : IN ART, RELIGION, SCIENCE OR PHILOSOPHY, OF WHATEVER AGE OR COUNTRY. *< If thou wouldst master care and pain, Unfold this book: and read and read again Its blessed leaves, whereby thou soon shalt see The past, the present, and the days to be With opened eyes ” C. R. Haines. CONTENTS Pages Foreword .. .. .. .. .. i-ix Preface . xi-xxxix Vedic Invocation . 1-5 Chapter I. Agama Prakarapa . 7-90 Chapter II. Illusion „ .. .. 91-144 III. 145-225 Chapter On Advaita _ Chapter IV. Quenching of Fire-Brand . 226-332 The Concluding Salutation by Sri Sankaracharya 333-334 Index . 335-339* NOTE “ The unique feature of Mtindukya lies in this that while all the other Upanishads deal with the several phases of Vedanta, such •as Religion, Theology, Scholasticism, Mysticism, Science, Meta* physics and Philosophy, Mindukya deals exclusively with Philosophy, as defined by the most modern authorities. The three fundamental problems of philosophy, according to this special treatise are, (1) the nature of the external (material) and the internal (mental) worlds ; (2) the nature of consciousness ; and (3) the meaning of causality. Each of these subjects is dealt with in a chapter. The 'first chapter sums up the whole at the very commencement. There is nothing more for philosophy to do. While it shows how the most advanced modern sciences and modern philosophies are approaching its conclusions, it gives to the world of our own times its central doctrine that partial data give partial truth, whereas the totality of data alone gives perfect truth. The ‘ Totality ’ of data we have only when the three states of waking, dream and deep-sleep are co-ordinated for investigation. Endless will be the systems of philosophy, if based on the waking state only. Above all inasmuch as this philosophy holds that mere ‘satisfaction’ is no criterion of truth, the best preparation for a study of Vedanta Philosophy is .a training in scientific method, but with a determination to get at ” ‘ •the very end : To stop not till the goal (of Truth) is reached.’ V. S. I. FOREWORD O one that knows anything of the philosophy of N the Upanishads can be said to be ignorant of the place that Mandukya Upanishad with its Kdrikas occupies in it. If a man cannot afford to study all the hundred and more Upanishads, it will be enough, it is declared in the Muktikopanishad, if he reads the one Upanishad of Mandukya, since, as Sankara also says, it contains the quintessence of all of them. Thoroughly to grasp the philosophy taught in Mandukya, one needs a know- ledge of the whole field of ancient Indian thought. Such being the nature of this work, one with my limitations of knowledge cannot presume to be able to do any justice to its merits and that in, what is called a “Foreword”. And yet if I agreed to write a foreword to Swami Nikhilanandaji’s most valuable publication it was not because I had any thouglit that this well-known and learned author of the translations of Vedantasara and Dry Drsya Viveka and frequent writer to many leading Indian journals on religion and philosophy needed an introduction to the literary world. Nor did I think that I could add anything of value to his critical and scholarly preface and notes. On the other hand, I consented because I felt that this was an opportunity for me to indicate in some measure the place of Gaucjapada, not among religionists, theologians, scholastics or mystics but among philosophers. In what high regard he is held by the Vedantins of the past is well known. But the esteem that he commands among distinguished men of •our own times has yet to be pointed out. With this object 2 ii FOREWORD in view and also with an idea of acknowledging my own- indebtedness to some of them I have ventured to say a few words. Of two such renowned personages of our day one was my most revered Guru, the late §ri Satchida- nanda Sivabhinava Narasimha Bharati Swami of Sringeri, who introduced me to the study of the Karikds, at whose- feet I had the inestimable privilege of sitting as a pupil. Here, a short account of my first lesson in Gaudapada may not be considered irrelevant by the reader. The very first day I paid my respects to the Swami more than forty years ago, I started thus: “The follower of every religion thinks that his faith, his scripture or his inter- pretation of it reveals the highest truth and that they are therefore superior to other faiths, scriptures or inter- pretations. This notion has contributed not a little to- the misfortunes of mankind in this world. The case is- not far different with many of those that are called philosophers. Though they have not instigated men to cause bloodshed, as mere religionists have done and are- still doing, yet they have made their followers delight rather in their points of difference than in those of agreement. How then is a Hindu in any way better than a Mahomedan «r a Christian ? Or, again, if truth- or ultimate truth, a something common to all minds,, cannot be rationally reached, is not philosophic enquiry a wild goose chase, as so many modern and honest: thinkers have held ? Lastly, as regards truth itself, every- one, even a fool, thinks that what he knows is the truth.”' The Swami in reply said, “What you say may be true with regard to mere religion, mysticism, theology or scholasticism which are mistaken for philosophy. It may be so with the early or intermediate stages in, philosophy. But Vedanta, particularly its philosophy,. FOREWORD iii is something different. It starts with the very question you ask. It sets before itself the object of finding a truth, ‘Free from all dispute’ and ‘Not opposed to any school of thought or religion or interpretation of 'scriptures’. Its truth is independent of sect, creed, colour, race, sex, and belief. And it aims at what is ‘Equally good for all beings’.” Then, I said, that I would devote the whole of my life to the study of "Vedanta, if the Swami would be so gracious, as to introduce me to a Vedantin, past or present, that did not or does not claim superiority for his religion over others on the authority of his own scripture, who does not refuse to open the gates of his heaven to those that differ from him, but who seeks only such philosophic .truth as does not lead to differences among men. Immediately the revered Guru quoted three verses from ’Gaudapada, Karikas II— 1, III— 17 and IV-2, and explained them, the substance of which has been quoted above. “If you want,” he added, “truth indisputable by any one and truth beneficent to all men, nay, to all beings, read and inwardly digest what Sankara’s teacher’s teacher, Sri Gaudapada says in his Karikas." The other eminent personage to whom I owe most of my effort to make a critical study of Gaudapada is His •Highness the Maharaja of Mysore, Sri Krishnaraja Wadiyar Bahadur IV. His profound and extensive knowledge of philosophy and particularly his high regard for Mandukya Upanishad and the Karikas, led to frequent talks on the topics dealt with therein. His Highness who is accustomed to meeting learned scholars, pious religionists, and deep thinkers of all types and of different countries, is a most disinterested critic. This (drove me to the necessity of ascertaining how far IV FOREWORD Gauqiapada’s views are of value from the standpoint: of the student of Western science and philosophy and how far the ancient Vedanta could stand the fire of modern criticism, particularly of science, a knowledge of which is so indispensable to the study of philosophy nowadays. In this connection, I must not forget to mention that my debt is also immense to Mr. K. A. Krishnaswami Iyer, the Vedantin of Bangalore, and to those Swamis of the Sri Ramakrishna Order, that have devoted their life' to the philosophical pursuit of truth both from the- ancient and from the modern view-points and that have' been with me at Mysore. After studying Gaudapada for a time I turned to the Upanishads and to Brahma-Sutras as interpreted by Sankara, under the Sringeri Swami’s invaluable guidance.. I have now for more than forty years read and re-read them in the light of the Swami’s teachings and I find that Vedanta is far in advance, not merely of the most modern Western philosophic thought, but also of scientific thought, so far as its pursuit of knowledge for its own sake is concerned. To refer to an instance or two: Two thousand years ago Gaudapada anticipated what science is just beginning to guess in regard to ‘causal’ relation without a knowledge of which Vedanta can never be understood.
Recommended publications
  • Art. IX.—On the Interpretation of the Veda
    303 ART. IX.—On, the Interpretation of the Veda. BY J. MUIR, Esq. I AM led to make some remarks on the subject of this paper by a passage in Mr. Cowell'3 preface to the fourth volume of the late Professor Wilson's translation of the Big- veda, which appears to me unduly to depreciate the services which have already been rendered by those eminent scholars both in Germany and in England who have begun to apply the scientific processes of modern philology to the explanation of this ancient hymn-collection. Mr. Cowell admits (p. vi.),— " As Vaidik studies progress, and more texts are published and studied, fresh light will be thrown on these records of the ancient world; and we may gradually attain a deeper insight into their meaning than the mediaeval Hindus could possess, just as a modern scholar may understand Homer more thoroughly than the Byzantine scholiasts." But he goes on to say :— "It is easy to depreciate native commentators, but it is not so easy to supersede them; and while I would by no means uphold Sayana as infallible, I confess that, in the present early stage of Vaidik studies in Europe, it seems to me the safer course to follow native tradition rather than to accept too readily the arbitrary con- jectures which continental scholars so often hazard." Without considering it necessary to examine, or defend, all the explanations of particular words proposed by the foreign lexicographers alluded to by Mr. Cowell, I yet venture to think that those scholars have been perfectly justified in com- mencing at once the arduous task of expounding the Veda on the principles of interpretation which they have adopted and enunciated.
    [Show full text]
  • Advaita, Vishistadvaita and Dvaita
    FAQ Advaita, Vishistadvaita and Dvaita 1. How did the three systems of Vedanta philosophy, namely Advaita, Vishistadvaita and Dvaita come about? 2. What is the Bheda sruti? 3. What are the passages in the Vedas which come under the category of bheda sruti? 4. What is Abheda sruti? 5. What are the passages in the veda that describe the Abhedasruti? 6. What is Ghataka sruti? 7. Name the passages from the Vedas, which are in the nature of Ghataka sruti? 8. Why is this called Antaryami Brahmana? 9. Why are the above passages of the Vedas called ghataka sruti? 10. How do we then interpret the abheda sruti? 11. Explain a little more on Abheda Sruti? 12. So, what is the final conclusion on Abheda Sruthi? 13. What is the meaning of the word "Advaita"? 14. What is the meaning of the word "Visishtadvaita"? 15. What is the meaning of the word" Dvaita"? 16. How do the Advaitins explain the various passages in the Vedas, which do not support their philosophy? In other words, how do they explain the bheda srutis which say that Jivatma and Paramatma are different? 17. How do Vishistadvaitin's rebut the argument of Advaitins that abheda srutis supersede the bheda srutis? 18. How do the Dvaitins explain the abheda srutis, which are against their philosophy - that Jivatma and Paramatma are eternally different? 19. What is Vishistadvaitins answer to this argument? 20. So, what is the speciality of Visishtadvaita vis-a-vis Advaita and Dvaita? 21. What does the term 'maya' mean? 22. But certainly, one is seeing the world; and one sees the various things in the world, with our eyes.
    [Show full text]
  • Mandukya Upanishad Class 6
    Mandukya Upanishad Class 6 Mantra # 5: That is the state of deep sleep wherein the sleeper does not desire any objects nor does he see any dream. The third quarter (pada) is the “Prajna” whose sphere is deep sleep, in whom all (experiences) become unified or undifferentiated, who is verily a homogeneous mass of Consciousness entire, who is full of bliss, who is indeed an enjoyer of bliss and who is the very gateway for projection of consciousness into other two planes of Consciousness-the dream and the waking. Swamiji said the four padas are being explained from mantra # 3. First pada is the sthula atma where “I”, Chaitanyam, am connected with Sthula nama rupa. When I am connected with one sthula nama rupa I am vishwa sthula atma. When I am connected with samashti, I am called Samashti Sthula atma. In second pada or mantra the sukshma atma has both micro and macro aspects to it. Thus, I have Vyashti and samashti aspects in dream state. Vyashti is Taijasa and samashti is Hiranyagarbha. In the fifth mantra we have come to karana atma. Here I am in shushupti avastha associated with karana nama rupas, all in potential form. Individual nama rupa are called Pragya karana atma. All nama rupa’s in potential form are called anataryami karana atma. In jagrat and svapna avastha micro and macrocosm are visibly different while in sushupti I can’t differentiate between Vyashti and samashti; however, differences do exist. Pragya and anatharyami are physically visible but theoretically we should know that they are different.
    [Show full text]
  • The Significance of Fire Offering in Hindu Society
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH ISSN : 2277-7881; IMPACT FACTOR - 2.735; IC VALUE:5.16 VOLUME 3, ISSUE 7(3), JULY 2014 THE SIGNIFICANCE OF FIRE OFFERING IN HINDU THE SIGNIFICANCESOCIETY OF FIRE OFFERING IN HINDU SOCIETY S. Sushrutha H. R. Nagendra Swami Vivekananda Yoga Swami Vivekananda Yoga University University Bangalore, India Bangalore, India R. G. Bhat Swami Vivekananda Yoga University Bangalore, India Introduction Vedas demonstrate three domains of living for betterment of process and they include karma (action), dhyana (meditation) and jnana (knowledge). As long as individuality continues as human being, actions will follow and it will eventually lead to knowledge. According to the Dhatupatha the word yajna derives from yaj* in Sanskrit language that broadly means, [a] worship of GODs (natural forces), [b] synchronisation between various domains of creation and [c] charity.1 The concept of God differs from religion to religion. The ancient Hindu scriptures conceptualises Natural forces as GOD or Devatas (deva that which enlightens [div = light]). Commonly in all ancient civilizations the worship of Natural forces as GODs was prevalent. Therefore any form of manifested (Sun, fire and so on) and or unmanifested (Prana, Manas and so on) form of energy is considered as GOD even in Hindu tradition. Worship conceives the idea of requite to the sources of energy forms from where the energy is drawn for the use of all 260 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH ISSN : 2277-7881; IMPACT FACTOR - 2.735; IC VALUE:5.16 VOLUME 3, ISSUE 7(3), JULY 2014 life forms. Worshiping the Gods (Upasana) can be in the form of worship of manifest forms, prostration, collection of ingredients or devotees for worship, invocation, study and discourse and meditation.
    [Show full text]
  • Mandukya Upanishad
    MANDUKYA UPANISHAD An ancient Sanskrit text on the nature of Reality James Swartz © 1996 MANDUKYA UPANISHAD Vedic culture is based on the Vedas,1 books of knowledge of great antiquity. The four Vedas are divided into three parts. The mantras, the earliest portion, are hymns to the power of nature which is seen as a kind, tolerant and merciful, yet mighty, severe, and unrelenting deity. The Brahmanas, are detailed instructions needed to perform rituals and meditations that produce certain sought-after and limited results: wealth, progeny, a happy afterlife, health, etc. Such knowledge is valuable for those who believe that happiness comes from outside themselves. A few of us doubt that lasting happiness comes from the pursuit of desired objects and/or the performance of finite activities, religious or otherwise, in a time-bound world and, for whatever reasons, are convinced that happiness comes from within. The Aranyakas or Upanishads, the third portion of each Veda, commonly known as Vedanta, agrees and delivers an “absolute” 2 knowledge that, under the right circumstances, reveals the limitless blissful Self and destroys the suffering arising from the belief in oneself as a limited being. Actions, subtle and gross, can only produce things not immediately available. For example, if I live in San Francisco and want to go to New York I need to catch a plane, or drive a car. But the Self, the limitless I, our true identity, is eternally present, the nearest of the near, so no action will help me reach it. Find more free PDF E-book at www.holybooks.com http://www.holybooks.com/mandukya-upanishad-an-ancient-sanskrit-text-on-the-nature-of-reality/ One day a devotee said to God, “Please give me a head on my shoulders.” God thought long and hard about the request and concluded that, in spite of His omnipotence, He could do nothing.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Format of This Book
    COMMENTARY ON THE MUNDAKA UPANISHAD COMMENTARY ON THE MUNDAKA UPANISHAD SWAMI KRISHNANANDA Published by THE DIVINE LIFE SOCIETY P.O. SHIVANANDANAGAR—249 192 Distt. Tehri-Garhwal, Uttarakhand, Himalayas, India www.sivanandaonline.org, www.dlshq.org First Edition: 2017 [1,000 copies] ©The Divine Life Trust Society EK 56 PRICE: ` 95/- Published by Swami Padmanabhananda for The Divine Life Society, Shivanandanagar, and printed by him at the Yoga-Vedanta Forest Academy Press, P.O. Shivanandanagar, Distt. Tehri-Garhwal, Uttarakhand, Himalayas, India For online orders and catalogue visit: www.dlsbooks.org puBLishers’ note We are delighted to bring our new publication ‘Commentary on the Mundaka Upanishad’ by Worshipful Sri Swami Krishnanandaji Maharaj. Saunaka, the great householder, questioned Rishi Angiras. Kasmin Bhagavo vijnaate sarvamidam vijnaatam bhavati iti: O Bhagavan, what is that which being known, all this—the entire phenomena, experienced through the mind and the senses—becomes known or really understood? The Mundaka Upanishad presents an elaborate answer to this important philosophical question, and also to all possible questions implied in the one original essential question. Worshipful Sri Swami Krishnanandaji Maharaj gave a verse-by-verse commentary on this most significant and sacred Upanishad in August 1989. The insightful analysis of each verse in Sri Swamiji Maharaj’s inimitable style makes the book a precious treasure for all spiritual seekers. —THE DIVINE LIFE SOCIETY 5 TABLE OF Contents Publisher’s Note . 5 CHAPTER 1: Section 1 . 11 Section 2 . 28 CHAPTER 2: Section 1 . 50 Section 2 . 68 CHAPTER 3: Section 1 . 85 Section 2 . 101 7 COMMENTARY ON THE MUNDAKA UPANISHAD Chapter 1 SECTION 1 Brahmā devānām prathamaḥ sambabhūva viśvasya kartā bhuvanasya goptā, sa brahma-vidyāṁ sarva-vidyā-pratiṣṭhām arthavāya jyeṣṭha-putrāya prāha; artharvaṇe yām pravadeta brahmātharvā tām purovācāṅgire brahma-vidyām, sa bhāradvājāya satyavāhāya prāha bhāradvājo’ṇgirase parāvarām (1.1.1-2).
    [Show full text]
  • Sri Ramakrishna, Swami Vivekananda, and Hindu-Christian Dialogue
    Journal of Hindu-Christian Studies Volume 8 Article 5 January 1995 Sri Ramakrishna, Swami Vivekananda, and Hindu-Christian Dialogue Michael Stoeber Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.butler.edu/jhcs Part of the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Stoeber, Michael (1995) "Sri Ramakrishna, Swami Vivekananda, and Hindu-Christian Dialogue," Journal of Hindu-Christian Studies: Vol. 8, Article 5. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7825/2164-6279.1110 The Journal of Hindu-Christian Studies is a publication of the Society for Hindu-Christian Studies. The digital version is made available by Digital Commons @ Butler University. For questions about the Journal or the Society, please contact [email protected]. For more information about Digital Commons @ Butler University, please contact [email protected]. Stoeber: Sri Ramakrishna, Swami Vivekananda, and Hindu-Christian Dialogue SRI RAMAKRISHNA, SWAl\II VIVEKANANDA, AND HINDU-CHRISTIAN DIALOGUE* Michael Stoeber The Catholic University of America IN THE LATE smnmer of 1993, noted for his interests in Buddhism, representatives of the major religions of the Sikhism, J ainism, Islam, and Christianity. world met in interfaith dialogue in Chicago, Indeed, his experiences of elements of these to celebrate the centenary of the 1893 different faiths led him to advocate a World's Parliament of Religions. The 1893 common divine Reality behind the many Parliament was remarkable, both in its forms of religiousness, despite the many magnitude and its purpose: it brought differences between traditions. He once together forty-one denominations and over commented, for example: four hundred men and women in a forum of A lake has several ghats [bathing mutual teaching and learning.
    [Show full text]
  • 108 Upanishads
    108 Upanishads From the Rigveda 36 Dakshinamurti Upanishad From the Atharvaveda 1 Aitareya Upanishad 37 Dhyana-Bindu Upanishad 78 Annapurna Upanishad 2 Aksha-Malika Upanishad - 38 Ekakshara Upanishad 79 Atharvasikha Upanishad about rosary beads 39 Garbha Upanishad 80 Atharvasiras Upanishad 3 Atma-Bodha Upanishad 40 Kaivalya Upanishad 81 Atma Upanishad 4 Bahvricha Upanishad 41 Kalagni-Rudra Upanishad 82 Bhasma-Jabala Upanishad 5 Kaushitaki-Brahmana 42 Kali-Santarana Upanishad 83 Bhavana Upanishad Upanishad 43 Katha Upanishad 84 Brihad-Jabala Upanishad 6 Mudgala Upanishad 44 Katharudra Upanishad 85 Dattatreya Upanishad 7 Nada-Bindu Upanishad 45 Kshurika Upanishad 86 Devi Upanishad 8 Nirvana Upanishad 46 Maha-Narayana (or) Yajniki 87 Ganapati Upanishad 9 Saubhagya-Lakshmi Upanishad Upanishad 88 Garuda Upanishad 10 Tripura Upanishad 47 Pancha-Brahma Upanishad 48 Pranagnihotra Upanishad 89 Gopala-Tapaniya Upanishad From the Shuklapaksha 49 Rudra-Hridaya Upanishad 90 Hayagriva Upanishad Yajurveda 50 Sarasvati-Rahasya Upanishad 91 Krishna Upanishad 51 Sariraka Upanishad 92 Maha-Vakya Upanishad 11 Adhyatma Upanishad 52 Sarva-Sara Upanishad 93 Mandukya Upanishad 12 Advaya-Taraka Upanishad 53 Skanda Upanishad 94 Mundaka Upanishad 13 Bhikshuka Upanishad 54 Suka-Rahasya Upanishad 95 Narada-Parivrajaka 14 Brihadaranyaka Upanishad 55 Svetasvatara Upanishad Upanishad 15 Hamsa Upanishad 56 Taittiriya Upanishad 96 Nrisimha-Tapaniya 16 Isavasya Upanishad 57 Tejo-Bindu Upanishad Upanishad 17 Jabala Upanishad 58 Varaha Upanishad 97 Para-Brahma Upanishad
    [Show full text]
  • Vol. 30, No.6 November/December 2019
    Vol. 30, No.6 November/December 2019 A CHINMAYA MISSION SAN JOSE PUBLICATION MISSION STATEMENT To provide to individuals, from any background, the wisdom of Vedanta and practical means for spiritual growth and happiness, enabling them to become a positive contributor to the society. TheC particularhinmaya form that the L greatahari Lord took in the name of Sri Swami Tapovanam has dissolved, and he has gone back to merge into his own Nature. He has now become the Essence in each one of us. Wherever we find the glow of divine compassion, love, purity, and brilliance, there we see Sri Gurudev (Swami Tapovanji) with his ever-smiling face. He has left his sheaths. He has now become the Self in all of us. Ours is a great responsibility. It is not sufficient that only we ourselves evolve–we must learn to release him to visible expression everywhere. It is a glorious chance to take a sacred oath that we shall not rest contented until he is fulfilled. SWAMI CHINMAYANANDA from My Teacher, Swami Tapovanam CONTENTS Volume 30 No. 6 November/December 2019 From The Editors Desk . 2 Chinmaya Tej Editorial Staff . 2 We Stand as One Family . 3 The Glory of Saṁnāsa . 10 The Ethos of Spirituality . 13 Friends of Swami Chinmayananda . 20 Tapovan Prasad . 21 Chinmaya Study Groups . 22 Adult Classes at Sandeepany . 23 Shiva Abhisheka & Puja . 23 Bala Vihar/Yuva Kendra & Language Classes . 24 Gita Chanting Classes for Children . 25 Vedanta Study Groups - Adult Sessions . 26 Swaranjali Youth Choir . 28 BalViHar Magazine . 29 Community Outreach Program . 30 Receptivity .
    [Show full text]
  • Mandukya Upanishad, Class 27
    Mandukya Upanishad, Class 27 Karika # 24: kāla iti kālavido diśa iti ca tadvidaḥ | vādā iti vādavido bhuvanānīti tadvidaḥ || 24 || 24. The Knowers1 of time call It time2; the Knowers of space (ether) call It space (ether). Those versed in disputation call It the problem in dispute and the Knowers of the worlds call It the worlds.3 Continuing his teaching Swamiji said, Gaudapada pointed out that universe experienced in any manner (as Swapna, Jagrat, or any other higher state), still remains an object of experience and thus a mithya. Mithya means relative reality, meaning it has meaning only in a particular state. Once the state changes, the object is no more real. The truth of Turiya Atma is that as Observer, I am the projector and sustainer and experiencer of whatever I projected with the help of a relevant body; the dream world through the dream body and the waking world through the waking body. The bodies themselves are projections. Using the projected bodies I experience the projected universe. When this truth is missed, so many anatmas are mistaken as atma, the reality. Until now, various misconceptions with regard to the external world were pointed out. Thus Swapna Prapancha is real in swapna but not in Jagrat; jagrat prapancha is real in jagrat but not in swapna. Therefore Gaudapada says Observer alone is Satyam while observed is Mithya. Advantage of this knowledge is that mithya, relative reality, cannot affect Satyam, the absolute reality. The advantage of this knowledge is that whatever happens in Drshya Prapancha, it does not affect Me.
    [Show full text]
  • The Upanishads- an Overview
    The Upanishads- An overview (S.N.Sastri) The word ‘Upanishad’ denotes Brahma-vidya by its derivation. Sri Sankara Bhagavatpada says in his Bhashya on the Kathopanishad that this word is derived by adding the prefixes ‘upa’ (meaning near) and ‘ni’ (with certainty) to the root ‘sad’ which means ‘to destroy’, ‘to reach’, and ‘to loosen’. Thus the meaning of the word ‘Upanishad’ is that it is the knowledge that destroys the seeds of worldly existence such as ignorance in the case of those seekers of liberation who, after becoming free from all desires approach (upa sad) this knowledge. The subject-matter of the upanishads is Brahman, the only Reality. Brihadaaranyaka upanishad, 3. 9. 26 says, “I ask you about Him, the Purusha of the upanishads”. The upanishads are the only source of knowledge about Brahman. The method adopted in Vedanta to impart the knowledge of Brahman is known as the method of superimposition ( adhyaaropa ) and subsequent negation ( apavaada ). In the Bhashya on Br.up.4.4.25 Bhagavatpada says, “The transmigrating self is indeed Brahman. He who knows the self as Brahman which is beyond fear becomes Brahman. This is the purport of the whole upanishad put in a nutshell. It is to bring out this purport that the ideas of creation, maintenance and dissolution of the universe, as well as the ideas of action, its factors and results were superimposed on the Self. Then, by the negation of the superimposed attributes the true nature of Brahman as free from all attributes has been brought out”. This is the method of adhyaaropa and apavaada, superimposition and negation, which is adopted by Vedanta.
    [Show full text]
  • He Hindu View of Life Accords Great Importance to the Mind Since Both
    ind Accordin to Hindu Philoso hical stems SWAMI HARSHANANDA he Hindu view of life accords great The Nyaya-Vaisheshika schools consider importance to the mind since both the manas or the mind as one of the dravyas abhyudaya (worldly prosperity) and (fundamental or basic realities) out of which nihshreyasa (spiritual progress) depend upon the world is eventually created. It acts as a the condition of the mind. An impure mind link between the soul and the sense-organs binds the soul to transmigratory existence by which the external objects are known. whereas a pure mind leads to moksha or Certain cults of Shaivism and Shaktaism liberation.! (Tantras) advocate the theory that mind is a While recognizing the importance limitation or a modification of pure conscious­ of the mind as a distinguishing unique fea­ ness. ture of human beings, the Hindu scriptures As regards the size of the mind, some and the various systems of Hindu philoso­ systems like Nyaya and Vaisheshika hold phy have given different views about its it as anu (atomic) while others (Advaita content, nature and function. A study of the Vedanta) consider it as Vibhu (all-pervading). mind, therefore, will not only be interesting Importance of the Mind but also useful in one's personal life of spiri­ tual evolution. The ultimate purpose of human life is to attain moksha or liberation from transmi­ What the Mind Is gratory existence. This is possible only when The Chhandogya Upanishad2 declared sadhana or spiritual practice is undertaken that the mind is 'annamaya', made up of the as per the dictates of the scriptures.
    [Show full text]