The Battle of Trent's Reach

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Battle of Trent's Reach On ichmond’sFront Line Volume 14, NumberR 2 Fall 2015 The Battle of Trent’s Reach DESPERATE TIMES ON THE JAMES RIVER Dantzler. This battery anchored the north end of the Howlett line that paralleled Butler’s line all the way to Behind the Dutch Gap Conservation Area in the Appomattox River. Chesterfield County is a long, shallow body of water known as Trent’s Reach. Cut off long ago by the By mid-June of 1864 the lines in Bermuda Hundred modern shipping channel at Dutch Gap, this quiet were firmly established and the siege of Petersburg stretch of the old river is now visited by the occasional was under way. At Trent’s Reach a series of fisherman or kayaker. The 4-mile loop trail at the obstructions and torpedoes were placed to keep the Dutch Gap Conservation Area follows along its edge Confederate James River Squadron up river and far and is a very popular spot for hikers and cyclists. Few away from the busy supply base that was taking shape people who visit are aware that in the shallow waters at City Point. In addition to the barrier, Union of Trent’s Reach, Union and Confederate ironclads ironclads frequently entered the waters of Trent’s squared off in one of the last naval engagements of the Reach to lob shells at Battery Dantzler and to Civil War. discourage any Confederate naval The eastern end excursions of Trent’s Reach downriver. Union was occupied by concerns at Trent’s Union General Reach were very Benjamin F. Butler real. While limited in May of 1864. in its area of Butler landed operations, the 40,000 troops at James River Bermuda Hundred, Squadron still had quickly marched the ability to pack a west, and punch in the form established a of three ironclads, defensive line. This the Virginia II, the line began at the Richmond and the Appomattox River Fredericksburg. All at present day R. C.S.S. Fredericksburg & C.S.S. Virginia II under fire from Union shore batteries and the U.S.S. three ironclads had Garland Dodd Park Onondaga. Copyright Tom W. Freeman, courtesy of SM&S Naval Prints, Inc. all rights reserved. 4 guns and a crew at Point of Rocks of approximately and stretched north until it reached the James River 150 men. During the summer and fall of 1864 these where the River’s Bend subdivision is located today. ships made occasional forays down the James, but Butler had three gun positions constructed on the their role had mostly been to act as floating batteries in bluffs overlooking the James River. These batteries support of land operations. As the war dragged on into named Wilcox, Parsons and Spofford commanded the the winter of 1864-65, the ironclads would finally get one mile length of Trent’s Reach. At the western end their opportunity to take the fight to the enemy. of the reach, the Confederates constructed Battery At 5:00 PM on January 23, 1865, the James River 2015 Annual Meeting & Tour Squadron under the command of Captain John K. Saturday, October 24, 10 am Mitchell began to descend the James River from Second Deep Bottom Chaffin’s Bluff. The Fredericksburg led with the (details & map inside) gunboat Hampton and torpedo boat Hornet lashed to its side. Next was the Virginia II with the gunboat In late January 1865, the Confederacy’s James River Parsons and small arms from along the shore. By 1 Squadron finally seized an opportunity to take an active AM the passage was clear but the Fredericksburg and part in the defense of Richmond and, if it were the Hampton were the only vessels that ventured successful, affect the outcome of the war in the Eastern downriver. At the western end of Trent’s Reach, the Theatre. The result was the battle of Trent’s Reach. — John M. Coski, historian & author of Virginia II and the Richmond had both run aground. Capital Navy: The Men, Ships and Operations The gunboats Nansemond and Beaufort spent three of the James River Squadron hours trying to free the Virginia II. During the night the Drewry and Scorpion also ran aground. The Nansemond, the tug Torpedo and the torpedo boat Fredericksburg and Hampton were recalled upriver to Scorpion secured to her sides. The ironclad Richmond protect the other ships. was last with the gunboats Drewry and Beaufort and As the sun rose, the Fredericksburg and the smaller the torpedo boat Wasp alongside. Their mission was to vessels retreated to a sheltered bend in the river slip past Federal guns at Fort Brady, cut through the opposite Battery Dantzler. The Richmond, Virginia II, obstructions at Trent's Reach, and attack the supply Drewry, and Scorpion were still stuck in the mud. The depot at City Point. Federal land batteries open fire, and a shot soon hit the The decision to make the attack was brought on by powder magazine of the Drewry, causing the ship to two factors. A reliable report indicated that recent explode. Gen. Grant is reported to have heard the floods had washed away some of the obstructions at explosion at his headquarters at City Point. The Trent’s Reach. Also, most of the Federal ships Scorpion was abandoned and fell into Federal hands. patrolling this part At 7:30 AM, the of the James had Federal batteries been sent to North trained their fire Carolina to take part onto the Richmond in the attack on Fort and Virginia II. Fisher. Timing was While this was critical and the occurring the USS movement toward Onondaga was City Point would be downriver near Deep a risky one. The Bottom. Commander James River William A. Parker, Squadron would who was in charge first have to get past of naval operations the guns of the 1st on the James, made Connecticut Heavy the decision to move Artillery at Fort the previous night in Brady. They would order to obtain what then need to cut he believed was a through the river more advantageous obstructions and get position. The following morning the ship made its way past the three batteries at Trent’s Reach. Waiting back upriver. At 10:15 the Onondaga joined the somewhere downriver was the double-turreted gunboats Hunchback and Massasoit and the torpedo ironclad Onondaga, one of the most powerful ships in boat Spuyten Duyvil at Trent’s Reach. By this time the the Union navy and one of the few left behind to guard rising tide was lifting the Virginia II and Richmond the James. Navigating the twists, turns, and shallows out of the mud. From a half-mile the Onondaga’s of the James River was another challenge. two15-inch guns made several hits on the vessels but Accomplishing all of this in darkness on a cold both were able to get upriver to safety. January night was a tall order. The Confederate ships remained under the shadow By 8 PM the flotilla reached Fort Brady where they of Battery Dantzler that day as another attempt to push received 25 shots from two 100 pounder and three 30 downriver was contemplated. After assessing the pounder guns. “The fort was instantly opened upon by damage his ships had suffered, Captain Mitchell the rebel land batteries, and their fire soon disabled decided to take the James River Squadron back one of the 100 pounder guns” reported Union Colonel upriver. The ships exchanged fire one more time with Henry Abbot. A design flaw in Fort Brady did not Fort Brady as they moved north and returned to their allow the guns to fire downriver as the Confederates anchorage at Chaffin’s Bluff. The attempt to break out sailed by. Soon the James River Squadron was past its and attack City Point was over. first obstacle. While now considered a minor footnote in the war, The Confederate flotilla reached Trent’s Reach at the action at Trent’s Reach caused quite a stir in the 10:30 PM. The Fredericksburg and the gunboat Hampton went forward and cut through the obstructions while under mortar fire from Battery Masthead photo on page 1: James River naval collage HELP RBA BUY LAND Directions 1. From I-295 go EAST on ROUTE 5 for 1.9 miles. NOT PAPER 2. Turn LEFT onto LONGBRIDGE RD, go 0.8 miles. 3. Turn LEFT onto YAHLEY MILL RD, go 1.3 miles. Save on Printing & 4. Turn RIGHT onto private drive marked by RBA signs. Mailing $$ 5. Proceed SLOWLY on gravel drive to parking area. Sign up for email delivery of the RBA newsletter • immediate delivery • full color • high quality pdf Request delivery at: [email protected] RBA NOTES 2015 ANNUAL MEETING & TOUR - SECOND DEEP BOTTOM It has been 6 years since we last met at Fussell’s Mill. There have been RBA members continue to opt for a number of exciting developments since then. Through a half-dozen electronic delivery of the RBA acquisitions, RBA has preserved over 50 critical acres of this important newsletter. You too can help us 1864 battlefield — 32 acres of the Aug. 14th site & 25 acres of the save money by choosing electronic Aug. 16th site. In addition, the historic miller’s house is being carefully delivery of “On Richmond’s Front restored. Join your fellow preservationists at Fussell’s Mill again this Line”. Just send your name and year. Bring a chair, pack a lunch, and tour the new property you helped email address to: save along Darbytown Road. This event is free and open to the public. [email protected] Don’t forget to stay up to date with TRENT’S REACH (continued) should report to City Point and RBA news & events on our website Union command.
Recommended publications
  • Confederate Historical Resources
    Confederate Historical Resources General Resources Clark, Walter. Histories of the Several Regiments and Battalions from North Carolina in the Great War 1861-'65. 5 vols. VA REF 973.7456 CLA Current, Richard N., editor. Encyclopedia of the Confederacy. 4 vols. VA REF 973.713 ENC Dyer, Frederick. A Compendium of the War of Rebellion. 4 vols. VA REF 973.7 DYE Felton, Silas, compiler. Military Bibliography of the Civil War. (Vol. 4 of Dornbush) VA REF 016.9737 FEL Evans, Clement, editor. Confederate Military History, Extended Edition. 17 vols. VA REF 973.7 CON Hewett, Janet B., editor. The Roster of Confederate Soldiers 1861 - 1865. 16 vols. VA REF 973.742 ROS Virginia Confederate Soldiers 1861 - 1865. 4 vols. VA REF 973.7455 VIR A to Z listing of servicemen from Virginia and their units. Howard, H.E., publisher. Virginia Regimental History Series and the Virginia Battles and Leaders Series. Located in Confederate Corner in numerical order by regiment/battalion and alphabetically by battery name. Manarin, Louis H., editor. Confederate Veteran Magazine. 43 vols. VA REF 973.74 CON Sifakis, Stewart. Compendium of Confederate Armies. 10 vols. VA REF 973.742 SIF Southern Bivouac. Publication of the Southern Historical Association of Louisville. 6 vols. VA REF 975 SOU Southern Historical Society Papers. 55 vols. VA REF 975.03 IND Warner, Ezra. Generals in Gray, Lives of the Confederate Commanders. VA REF 973.742 WAR The War of the Rebellion: A Compilation of the Official Records of the Union and Confederate Armies. 130 vols. VA REF 973.7 UNI Supplement to the Records of the Union and Confederate Armies.
    [Show full text]
  • Confederate Wooden Gunboat Construction
    Confederate Wooden Gunboat Construction: Logistical Nightmare By Adam C. Edmonds May, 2011 Director of Thesis: Lawrence E. Babits, Ph.D. History Department The Confederate States Navy built wooden gunboats throughout the American Civil War. Within Civil War literature, more research and detailed analysis of Confederate States Navy construction focuses on building of ironclad vessels. Wooden gunboat construction is largely ignored. This thesis examines wooden gunboat construction in two different areas of the Confederacy: northeastern North Carolina in Washington and Elizabeth City, and the Mars Bluff Navy Yard in South Carolina. Before presenting two Confederate wooden gunboat construction case studies, a look at Confederate industrial, manufacturing, and transportation infrastructure, from the national perspective, brings into focus the logistical limitations station commanders faced in northeastern North Carolina and at Mars Bluff more clearly. Scattered, yet interdependent, marine manufacturing and ordnance facilities, connected by a suspect transportation network, created a logistical nightmare. Historical investigation into wooden gunboat construction in Washington, Elizabeth City, and Mars Bluff, examines an overlooked Confederate States Navy building program. CONFEDERATE WOODEN GUNBOAT CONSTRUCTION: LOGISTICAL NIGHTMARE A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of History East Carolina University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Masters of Arts in History By Adam C. Edmonds May 2011 © Adam Edmonds,
    [Show full text]
  • Battle of Hampton Roads March 8-9, 1862 Before, During, After
    Welcome: To The Battle of Hampton Roads Be sure you are on Zoom Audio Mute and Stop Video Questions: please utilize the chat box to type in your questions during the presentation—I will try to answer them at the Break/End of Class At the bottom (or top) of your Zoom screen is a Menu Bar Click on the Chat icon to bring up the chat box Hit “Enter” on your keyboard to send your Chat message Recommend click on “show small active speaker video” Michael W. Collier, Ph.D. Docent, Mariners’ Museum Newport News, Virginia Source: Mariners’ Museum Meet the Instructor Education High School: Lafayette County C-1, Higginsville, Missouri BS, U.S. Coast Guard Academy MS, U.S. Defense Intelligence College (now National Intelligence University) Ph.D., International Relations, Florida International University Professional Career U.S. Coast Guard Officer (cutter operations/training & intelligence) Professor at FIU and Eastern Kentucky University In Retirement Osher Institute Instructor, College of William & Mary Docent, Mariners’ Museum, Newport News, Virginia Start of the U.S. Civil War Late-1700s & early-1800s’ politics surrounding slavery led to the war Abraham Lincoln (R) elected President on November 6, 1860 South Carolina seceded from the United States December 20, 1860 Seven total States in deep-south seceded by Lincoln’s inauguration March 4, 1961 Fort Sumter attacked April 12-13, 1861 Virginia seceded April 17, 1861, Source: Britannica followed by Tennessee, North Carolina, & Arkansas Anaconda Plan Union Early War Strategy: Blockade Confederate ports from Virginia to Florida, around Gulf of Mexico, and in Mississippi River System Seize Confederate capital in Richmond, Virginia—first attempt was Union Peninsula Campaign March-July 1862, commanded by MGen George McClellan Source: Library of Congress Building the Confederate Navy Confederate Secretary of the Navy Mallory faced building a Confederate Former U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Virginia's Civil
    Virginia’s Civil War A Guide to Manuscripts at the Virginia Historical Society A A., Jim, Letters, 1864. 2 items. Photocopies. Mss2A1b. This collection contains photocopies of two letters home from a member of the 30th Virginia Infantry Regiment. The first letter, 11 April 1864, concerns camp life near Kinston, N.C., and an impending advance of a Confederate ironclad on the Neuse River against New Bern, N.C. The second letter, 11 June 1864, includes family news, a description of life in the trenches on Turkey Hill in Henrico County during the battle of Cold Harbor, and speculation on Ulysses S. Grant's strategy. The collection includes typescript copies of both letters. Aaron, David, Letter, 1864. 1 item. Mss2AA753a1. A letter, 10 November 1864, from David Aaron to Dr. Thomas H. Williams of the Confederate Medical Department concerning Durant da Ponte, a reporter from the Richmond Whig, and medical supplies received by the CSS Stonewall. Albright, James W., Diary, 1862–1865. 1 item. Printed copy. Mss5:1AL155:1. Kept by James W. Albright of the 12th Virginia Artillery Battalion, this diary, 26 June 1862–9 April 1865, contains entries concerning the unit's service in the Seven Days' battles, the Suffolk and Petersburg campaigns, and the Appomattox campaign. The diary was printed in the Asheville Gazette News, 29 August 1908. Alexander, Thomas R., Account Book, 1848–1887. 1 volume. Mss5:3AL276:1. Kept by Thomas R. Alexander (d. 1866?), a Prince William County merchant, this account book, 1848–1887, contains a list, 1862, of merchandise confiscated by an unidentified Union cavalry regiment and the 49th New York Infantry Regiment of the Army of the Potomac.
    [Show full text]
  • “The Duel of the Ironclads” the CSS Virginia
    “The Duel of the Ironclads” Hampton Roads, Virginia 9 March 1862 The US Navy Historical Center Compiled and Edited by Major Paul L. Stokes USMC 20 February 2004 “The Duel of the Ironclads” Table of Contents Map of Hampton Roads Area and Lower James River, Virginia, 1861 3 The CSS Virginia 4 CSS Virginia destroys USS Cumberland and USS Congress, 8 March 1862 5 The USS Monitor 7 "The Duel of the Ironclads": Action between USS Monitor and CSS Virginia, 9 March 1862 8 The Aftermath 12 Battle Reports and Letters 13 - Battle Report of Captain Marston, U.S. Navy, senior officer present, aboard the screw frigate USS Roanoke (Pg 13) - Battle Report of Lieutenant George Morris, executive officer of the frigate USS Cumberland (Pg 15) - Battle Report of Lieutenant Pendergrast, U.S. Navy, executive officer of the frigate USS Congress (Pg 16) - Battle Report of Captain Van Brunt, U.S. Navy, commanding the steam frigate USS Minnesota (Pg 18) - Battle Report of Lieutenant Greene, U.S. Navy, executive officer of the [ironclad] USS Monitor (Pg 21) - Letter from Chief Engineer Stimers, USS Monitor, to Captain John Ericsson, giving an account of the engagement (Pg 22) - Battle Report of Flag-Officer Buchanan, Commander of CSS Virginia and the James River Squadron, C.S. Navy (Pg 23) - Battle Report of Lieutenant Jones, executive officer of the ironclad ram CSS Virginia, in command during the battle with USS Monitor (Pg 29) - Battle Report of Major-General Huger, C.S. Army, commanding Department of Norfolk, on the impact of ironclad warships in warfare (Pg 30) Sources & Notes 31 2 “The Duel of the Ironclads” 3 “The Duel of the Ironclads” The CSS Virginia (Formerly USS Merrimack) On 20 April 1861, when Virginia authorities took over the Norfolk Navy Yard after its evacuation by Federal forces, they found, among other valuable items, the hulk of the steam frigate USS Merrimack.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Resource and Current Condition Assessment
    REPORT > FULTON GAS WORKS SITE CULTURAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT AND CURRENT CONDITIONS REPORT DATE > JANUARY 2017 LOCATION > Richmond, Virginia PREPARED FOR > Timmons Group PREPARED BY > Dutton + Associates, LLC Dutton + Associates CULTURAL RESOURCE SURVEY, PLANNING, AND MANAGEMENT FULTON GAS WORKS SITE CULTURAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT AND CURRENT CONDITIONS REPORT RICHMOND, VIRGINIA PREPARED FOR: TIMMONS GROUP PREPARED BY: DUTTON + ASSOCIATES, LLC 1115 CROWDER DRIVE MIDLOTHIAN, VIRGINIA 23113 PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR: DAVID H. DUTTON, M.A. DARA A. FRIEDBERG, M.S. JANUARY 2017 ABSTRACT ABSTRACT The results of the study revealed that the project area was in the vicinity of the earliest settled area of Rocketts Landing. Historic maps and documents indicate that early development would have been consigned primarily to the western portion of the project area. Gillies Creek flowsd south and east of the project area, and at times possibly within it. The tributary Bloody Run, now filled, bisected the project area. Development had occurred in the western portion of the land by the early nineteenth century in form of dwellings and a tobacco factory. Following the incredible success of the City Gas Works on Cary Street between 15th and 16th streets, the City purchased land in Rocketts Landing for the construction of a new plant. The plant began operations in 1856. The Civil War, multiple floods, and changes in manufactured gas technology necessitated multiple repairs and rebuildings of the Gas Works. Changes between the 1920s and 1950s created the more modern layout of the site. What had become known as Fulton Gas Works continued operations until 1972 from which time it has remained vacant.
    [Show full text]
  • Register of Officers of the Confederate States Navy, 1861-1865
    This is a reproduction of a library book that was digitized by Google as part of an ongoing effort to preserve the information in books and make it universally accessible. https://books.google.com 536 • A3 T"9015"00234 004 3 B University of Michigan - BUHR ^ & rt> \ i & \TS ^""** ^0 ^ R> B C >> <V 8- O -^ *..-... Noli REGISTER OF OFFICERS OF THE CONFEDERATE STATES NAVY 1861-1865 r ; i •i.'i"iV»i v AS COMPILED AND REVISED BY THE MS .OFFICE OF NAVAL RECORDS AND LIBRARY UNITED STATES NAVY DEPARTMENT ..(.!<;. i >•!£ 1931, FROM ALL AVAILABLE DATA . \' tt'*fy . -..;,!! . ..^ •.;•)(/' 1 . /, UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1931 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D. C. Price 20 cents FOREWORD TO REVISED EDITION This publication is a revision of the list of officers of the Con federate States Navy, 1861-1865, published in 1898 by this office. The 1898 edition was prepared from the United States and Con federate navy registers, reports of officers, records of the office of the Secretary of the Navy, and miscellaneous papers. It was real ized at that time that the list of names and the information avail able were very incomplete, and every effort has been made since its publication to collect additional data. In publishing the 1898 edition, attention was called to its in completeness, and request made that any errors or omissions which might be noticed be brought to the attention of the Superintendent of the Office of Naval Records and Library with a view to making necessary corrections. As a result, approximately 400 additional names have since been added and much data concerning the service records of Confederate naval officers incorporated from records not previously available for research.
    [Show full text]
  • The Battle of Hampton Roads
    The Battle of Hampton Roads Hampton Roads was a peaceful waterway cross-roads prior to the start of the Civil War. The importance of the area, where the James, Nansemond and Elizabeth Rivers flow into the Chesapeake Bay, was instantly realized by both warring parties. The James River provided a direct water route between Richmond and the Chesapeake Bay. The large US naval base at Norfolk was abandoned by the Federals on April 20, 1861 and immediately taken over by the Confederates. This provided them with the potential to build an effective Navy if they could control the Hampton Roads outlet. Meanwhile, the United States knew that if they could control the area, they could lead a combined land and water attack on Rich- mond and put a quick end to the war. The Union vessels retained control of Chesapeake Bay and Hampton Roads until March 8, 1862, the day the Confederate ironclad Virginia, previously the USS frigate Merrimack, attacked the Federal fleet. In three hours the CSS Virginia destroyed two of the Union’s most powerful vessels and planned a return trip the following day to attack the USS Minnesota. To counter this, the newly-completed ironclad USS Monitor was hastily dispatched to Hamp- ton Roads during the night of March 8 arriving in position to protect the Min- nesota on March 9th at 2:00 AM. The CSS Virginia resumed the attack at map of Hampton Roads region 8:45 AM and after a four hour engagement, both ironclads withdrew. Both sides claimed victory. The USS Monitor had protected the Minnesota and the CSS Virginia won a strategic victory as it denied the Union naval use of Hampton Roads and the James River.
    [Show full text]
  • SEVEN DAYS BATTLES Visitor Guide to Richmond’S 1862 / 2012 Sesquicentennial Commemoration
    Richmond National Battlefield Park National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior MAY - JULY 1862 THE PENINSULA CAMPAIGN BATTLE OF DREWRY’S BLUFF SEVEN DAYS BATTLES Visitor Guide to Richmond’s 1862 / 2012 Sesquicentennial Commemoration TAKE THE JOURNEY. VISIT ONTORICHMOND.COM OR CALL 1-888-RICHMOND. www.nps.gov/rich www.Facebook.com/RichmondNPS One hundred and fifty years ago this spring, the eyes of the world were on Richmond. Here in May and June 1862, more than 200,000 Americans fought to decide the future of the United States. In April 1862, Union General George B. McClellan moved his army – numbering more than 100,000 – from his landing point at Fort Monroe, on the Virginia Peninsula, west toward Richmond. After a series of Confederate defeats in Kentucky and Tennessee, the capture of New Orleans, and now with a massive Union army approaching the capital, the future of Wherever McClellan’s army the Confederacy was went, its location instantly uncertain. McClellan became the ninth largest city hoped to take in North America. Richmond and bring the war to an end. By July, his campaign had failed and had caused more than 35,000 casualties on both sides. Far from ending, the course of the war was transformed. Northern leaders issued a call for tens of thousands of new troops and began to craft a document that would become the Emancipation Proclamation. The new commander of the Confederate Army of Northern Virginia – Robert E. Lee – had seized the initiative. Two months later, his army would be across the Potomac. 1862 TIMELINE | 2012 EVENTS May 15, 1862: Battle of Drewry’s Bluff | Pages 4 - 5 and costliest battle in the Eastern theatre thus far (95,000 engaged; Confederates were successful in preventing Union warships – estimated casualties 15,000).
    [Show full text]
  • Liberty University a Peculiar Service
    LIBERTY UNIVERSITY A PECULIAR SERVICE: THE CHRONOLOGICAL EXPLOITS AND EVOLVING NATURE OF THE CONFEDERATE STATES MARINE CORPS SUBMITTED TO DR. SMITH IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE COMPLETION OF HIST 690 BY LUCAS PEED LYNCHBURG, VIRGINIA MAY 1 2019 1 Contents Introduction 2 Chapter 1 Marine Origins and Traditions 10 Chapter 2 Beginnings and Change 34 Chapter 3 From Drewry’s Bluff and Back Again 52 Chapter 4 A Short-Lived Corps 75 Conclusion 102 Bibliography 110 2 Introduction Before the first shots of the American Civil War echoed across Charleston Harbor on April 12, 1861, the Confederate States Marine Corps had already been established and was being shaped into small yet integral part of the Confederate States of America’s military. Throughout the entirety of the war, these marines served both on land and sea and earned the reputation of being some of the South’s most formidable soldiers. However, few today know of the existence of the Confederate Marines and are surprised to learn that these men participated in several of the most famous and decisive engagements of the war. This forgotten nature of the Confederate States Marines is largely due to the fact that the marines were overshadowed by the Confederate Army and Navy, yet in almost every naval and coastal engagement, the marines provided valuable service to the Confederate war effort. Although technological advancements and circumstance changed the roles of the Confederate Marines throughout the war, they constantly adapted, and continued to be an important part of the Confederate military. Despite its small size and its overshadowed nature, the story of the Confederate States Marine Corps is an important part of Civil War history and deserves to be told.
    [Show full text]
  • The War Focuses on Richmond and South Carolina Http
    The War Focuses on Richmond and South Carolina http://civilwar150.longwood.edu The Confederate Army continues to defend the Richmond-Petersburg lines with only 46,000 Confederate troops. They are stretched thin on the 37 mile front. Lee, Confederate General-in-Chief, requests an immediate wave of reinforcements. Confederate President, Jefferson Davis, approves Robert E. Lee’s measure for deserters reporting within thirty days being able to receive a pardon. This eases the draining of manpower for a time. Sherman’s March through the Carolinas continued. Confederates tried to defend Charleston Harbor, James Island as well as Johnson’s Station in South Carolina as Sherman’s invading troops moved from the sea through the interior of the state. Sherman pushed across the Congaree River and marched toward Columbia. President Davis continued to urge Beauregard and Hardee to hold on to Charleston at all costs. For the Confederates in South Carolina prospects were dark. Beauregard had only remnants of troops to defend Augusta, Ga., and Hardee waited for the possible time when he must abandon Charleston and Fort Sumter. Wade Hampton had been sent from the Virginia front to his home state to command cavalry, but he had not been able to do anything significant. On the political front, the House of Representatives passed a joint resolution declaring that the rebelling states were not allowed to participate in the Electoral College. Once the electoral votes were counted, Abraham Lincoln was officially re-elected. He had two hundred twelve votes to McClellan’s 12 votes. Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, Virginia Unionists, Ohio, and Missouri ratified the thirteenth amendment to free slaves.
    [Show full text]
  • CSS Richmond
    CONFEDERATE HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION OF BELGIUM Serge Noirsain By Robert Holcombe Curator of the Confederate Naval Museum of Columbus, Georgia It is not generally realized, even among the more knowledgeable Civil War enthusiasts that the Confederate Navy attempted to build approximately 50 ironclad warships during the course of the war, about 25 of which were commissioned and saw service. The Virginia (Merrimack), Albemarle and Tennessee are well known because of the significant battles they took part in ; but what about the Richmond, Chicora, Savannah and others that served the South admirably ? This article, then, deals with six of those lesser known Confederate ironclads: the Chicora, North Carolina, Palmetto State, Raleigh, Richmond and Savannah. Known collectively as the Richmond Class, this rather obscure group of vessels played a prominent part in the development of the Confederate Navy’s ironclad building program. The design for the Richmond Class evolved from the Confederate Navy’s defensive strategy for its “home-built” ironclads that became policy in late 1861 - early 1862. This defensive strategy originated when the Confederate Navy Department realized that it would be unable to construct large sea-going ironclads warships capable of breaking the Union blockade of Southern ports and would have to depend on European shipyards to furnish these vessels. Until they could be constructed, however, shipyards within the Confederacy would have to build smaller ironclads or simplified design capable of defending its harbors and coastal waters. Prior to the adoption of this defensive strategy there had been little, if any, standardization in the design if the Confederacy’s first ironclads.
    [Show full text]