Parus Cristatus

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Parus Cristatus Parus cristatus -- Linnaeus, 1758 ANIMALIA -- CHORDATA -- AVES -- PASSERIFORMES -- PARIDAE Common names: Crested Tit; European Red List Assessment European Red List Status LC -- Least Concern, (IUCN version 3.1) Assessment Information Year published: 2015 Date assessed: 2015-03-31 Assessor(s): BirdLife International Reviewer(s): Symes, A. Compiler(s): Ashpole, J., Burfield, I., Ieronymidou, C., Pople, R., Wheatley, H. & Wright, L. Assessment Rationale European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC) EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC) At both European and EU27 scales this species has an extremely large range, and hence does not approach the thresholds for Vulnerable under the range size criterion (Extent of Occurrence 10% in ten years or three generations, or with a specified population structure). Despite the fact that the population trend appears to be decreasing, the decline is not believed to be sufficiently rapid to approach the thresholds for Vulnerable under the population trend criterion (30% decline over ten years or three generations). For these reasons the species is evaluated as Least Concern within both Europe and the EU27. Occurrence Countries/Territories of Occurrence Native: Albania; Andorra; Austria; Azerbaijan; Belarus; Belgium; Bosnia and Herzegovina; Bulgaria; Croatia; Czech Republic; Denmark; Estonia; Finland; France; Germany; Greece; Hungary; Italy; Latvia; Liechtenstein; Lithuania; Luxembourg; Macedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic of; Montenegro; Netherlands; Norway; Poland; Portugal; Romania; Russian Federation; Serbia; Slovakia; Slovenia; Spain; Sweden; Switzerland; Ukraine; United Kingdom Vagrant: Gibraltar (to UK) Population The European population is estimated at 5,450,000-9,810,000 pairs, which equates to 10,900,000-19,600,000 mature individuals. The population in the EU27 is estimated at 3,400,000-6,480,000 pairs, which equates to 6,790,000-13,000,000 mature individuals. For details of national estimates, see Supplementary PDF. Trend In Europe and the EU27 the population size is estimated to be decreasing by less than 25% in 12 years (three generations). For details of national estimates, see Supplementary PDF. Habitats and Ecology This species breeds predominately in coniferous woods. In Fennoscandia and western and central Europe it is found in forests of Scots Pine (Pinus sylvestris) or Norway Spruce (Picea abies). In southern Europe it uses mixed-conifer montane forests (Hagemeijer and Blair 1997). It breeds from March to June and is monogamous, forming a lifelong pair bond. The nest is a cup of moss, lichens, animal hair, wool, feathers and gossamer, in a hole in a dead or decaying tree trunk, branch or stump, occasionally in a living tree. Occasionally uses a hole in a fence post or in the ground and nestboxes are also regularly used. It usually lays five to eleven eggs. It feeds mainly on small invertebrates and their larvae and outside the breeding season it will also consume seeds and some fruits. The species is mostly resident but is nomadic in the winter (Gosler and Clement 2007). Habitats & Altitude Habitat (level 1 - level 2) Importance Occurrence Artificial/Terrestrial - Rural Gardens suitable resident Forest - Boreal suitable resident Forest - Temperate major resident Shrubland - Mediterranean-type Shrubby Vegetation suitable resident Shrubland - Temperate suitable resident Altitude max. 2300 m Occasional altitudinal limits Threats Populations of this species fluctuate in response to severe winter weather. The modernization of forestry practices has resulted in declines in Sweden and Czech Republic. In Scotland it suffered during 18th century from the destruction of its native Caledonian pine forest (Gosler and Clement 2007). In central Europe, atmospheric pollution has also lead to declines in this species (Hagemeijer and Blair 1997). Threats & Impacts Threat (level 1) Threat (level 2) Impact and Stresses Agriculture & Agro-industry Timing Scope Severity Impact aquaculture plantations Ongoing Majority (50-90%) Slow, Significant Medium Impact Declines Stresses Ecosystem conversion; Ecosystem degradation Biological resource Logging & wood Timing Scope Severity Impact use harvesting Past, Likely to Minority (<50%) Rapid Declines Past Impact (unintentional Return effects: (large scale) [harvest]) Stresses Ecosystem conversion Climate change & Temperature Timing Scope Severity Impact severe weather extremes Ongoing Majority (50-90%) Causing/Could Medium Impact cause fluctuations Stresses Species mortality Pollution Acid rain Timing Scope Severity Impact Ongoing Minority (<50%) Slow, Significant Low Impact Declines Stresses Indirect ecosystem effects Conservation Conservation Actions Underway Bern Convention Appendix II. There are currently no known conservation measures for this species. Conservation Actions Proposed The species would benefit from a reduction in industrial permissions. Management practices for forestry should be encouraged to leave dead or dying trees. In addition, the erection of nest boxes in plantations may be beneficial to this species (Maı́cas and Haeger 2004). Bibliography Gosler, A. and Clement, P. 2007. European Crested Tit (Lophophanes cristatus). In: del Hoyo, J., Elliott, A., Sargatal, J., Christie, D.A. and de Juana, E. (eds.) 2014. Handbook of the Birds of the World Alive. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona. (retrieved from http://www.hbw.com/node/59878 on 17 March 2015). Hagemeijer, W.J.M. and Blair, M.J. 1997. The EBCC Atlas of European Breeding Birds: Their Distribution and Abundance. T & A D Poyser, London. Maı́cas, R. and Haeger, J.F. 2004. Pine plantations as a breeding habitat for a hole-nesting bird species crested tit (Parus cristatus) in southern Spain. Forest Ecology and Management, 195(1): 267-278. Map (see overleaf) .
Recommended publications
  • 5.4. Changes in the Bird Communities of Sierra Nevada Zamora ,R.1 and Barea-Azcón, J.M.2 1 Andalusian Institute for Earth System Research
    5.4. Changes in the bird communities of Sierra Nevada Zamora ,R.1 and Barea-Azcón, J.M.2 1 Andalusian Institute for Earth System Research. University of Granada 2 Environment and Water Agency of Andalusia Abstract The changes in the composition and abundance of passerine communities were studied along an elevational gradient, comparing the results found by censuses made in three different habitats (oak forest, high-mountain juniper scrublands, and high-mountain summits) at the beginning of the 1980s and at present. The results indicate that in the last 30 years, notable changes have taken place in the composition and, especially, in the abundance of the passerine communities. Significant declines in populations were appreciated in many of the species that were dominant in the 1980s, particularly in oak forests and in high-mountain juniper scrublands. The magnitude of the changes diminishes with elevation, and therefore the ecosystem that has changed the most was the oak woodland and those that changed the least were the ecosystems of the high-summits. The bird communities in Sierra Nevada showed a strong spatio-temporal dynamic that appears to be accentuated by global change. Aims and methodology The censuses of reproductive birds compiled censuses were made along linear transects with [13 - 17]. The current censuses were undertaken at the beginning of the 1980s and at present a fixed bandwidth of 50 m, 25 m on each side of within the framework of the Sierra Nevada (2008-2012) were compared. The sites studied the observer. The sampling effort was similar in Global Change Observatory from 2008 to 2012, were the same in both periods: an oak forest both periods.
    [Show full text]
  • Hungary & Transylvania
    Although we had many exciting birds, the ‘Bird of the trip’ was Wallcreeper in 2015. (János Oláh) HUNGARY & TRANSYLVANIA 14 – 23 MAY 2015 LEADER: JÁNOS OLÁH Central and Eastern Europe has a great variety of bird species including lots of special ones but at the same time also offers a fantastic variety of different habitats and scenery as well as the long and exciting history of the area. Birdquest has operated tours to Hungary since 1991, being one of the few pioneers to enter the eastern block. The tour itinerary has been changed a few times but nowadays the combination of Hungary and Transylvania seems to be a settled and well established one and offers an amazing list of European birds. This tour is a very good introduction to birders visiting Europe for the first time but also offers some difficult-to-see birds for those who birded the continent before. We had several tour highlights on this recent tour but certainly the displaying Great Bustards, a majestic pair of Eastern Imperial Eagle, the mighty Saker, the handsome Red-footed Falcon, a hunting Peregrine, the shy Capercaillie, the elusive Little Crake and Corncrake, the enigmatic Ural Owl, the declining White-backed Woodpecker, the skulking River and Barred Warblers, a rare Sombre Tit, which was a write-in, the fluty Red-breasted and Collared Flycatchers and the stunning Wallcreeper will be long remembered. We recorded a total of 214 species on this short tour, which is a respectable tally for Europe. Amongst these we had 18 species of raptors, 6 species of owls, 9 species of woodpeckers and 15 species of warblers seen! Our mammal highlight was undoubtedly the superb views of Carpathian Brown Bears of which we saw ten on a single afternoon! 1 BirdQuest Tour Report: Hungary & Transylvania 2015 www.birdquest-tours.com We also had a nice overview of the different habitats of a Carpathian transect from the Great Hungarian Plain through the deciduous woodlands of the Carpathian foothills to the higher conifer-covered mountains.
    [Show full text]
  • Belarus in Spring
    Belarus in Spring Naturetrek Tour Report 6 - 13 May 2012 Report compiled by Attila Steiner Naturetrek Cheriton Mill Cheriton Alresford Hampshire SO24 0NG England T: +44 (0)1962 733051 F: +44 (0)1962 736426 E: [email protected] W: www.naturetrek.co.uk Tour Report Belarus in Spring Tour leaders: Attila Steiner Alexander Duka Participants: Elizabeth Briggs David Briggs Colin Hughes John Skeavington Jillian Bale Roberta Goodall Day 1 Sunday 6th May UK – Minsk – Liaskavichi Our flight from London arrived on time at Minsk International Airport. At the arrival hall Attila and Alexander greeted us. After changing money we had a tasty dinner at the airport restaurant. Then we started the long drive to our first hotel situated on the edge of the famous Pripiat National Park. We arrived at our hotel in Liaskavichi after midnight. After checking in some of us could hear Thrush Nightingale singing and Spotted Crakes calling from the nearby wetland. Day 2 Monday 7th May Liaskavich area of Pripiat National Park It was already sunny and hot outside when we gathered at the minivan ready to explore nearby woodlands and wetlands. As we drove through Liaskavichi we saw our first White Stork nest, one of the hundreds to be seen during the week. Our first stop along the road was for a raptor circling above the fields, which proved to be a Lesser Spotted Eagle. We soon left the main road and took a gravel road towards the woodlands. We stopped to watch a Black Kite flying above the forest. It then landed on top of a dead tree and we had prolonged scope views of this nice raptor.
    [Show full text]
  • Best of the Baltic - Bird List - July 2019 Note: *Species Are Listed in Order of First Seeing Them ** H = Heard Only
    Best of the Baltic - Bird List - July 2019 Note: *Species are listed in order of first seeing them ** H = Heard Only July 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th 13th 14th 15th 16th 17th Mute Swan Cygnus olor X X X X X X X X Whopper Swan Cygnus cygnus X X X X Greylag Goose Anser anser X X X X X Barnacle Goose Branta leucopsis X X X Tufted Duck Aythya fuligula X X X X Common Eider Somateria mollissima X X X X X X X X Common Goldeneye Bucephala clangula X X X X X X Red-breasted Merganser Mergus serrator X X X X X Great Cormorant Phalacrocorax carbo X X X X X X X X X X Grey Heron Ardea cinerea X X X X X X X X X Western Marsh Harrier Circus aeruginosus X X X X White-tailed Eagle Haliaeetus albicilla X X X X Eurasian Coot Fulica atra X X X X X X X X Eurasian Oystercatcher Haematopus ostralegus X X X X X X X Black-headed Gull Chroicocephalus ridibundus X X X X X X X X X X X X European Herring Gull Larus argentatus X X X X X X X X X X X X Lesser Black-backed Gull Larus fuscus X X X X X X X X X X X X Great Black-backed Gull Larus marinus X X X X X X X X X X X X Common/Mew Gull Larus canus X X X X X X X X X X X X Common Tern Sterna hirundo X X X X X X X X X X X X Arctic Tern Sterna paradisaea X X X X X X X Feral Pigeon ( Rock) Columba livia X X X X X X X X X X X X Common Wood Pigeon Columba palumbus X X X X X X X X X X X Eurasian Collared Dove Streptopelia decaocto X X X Common Swift Apus apus X X X X X X X X X X X X Barn Swallow Hirundo rustica X X X X X X X X X X X Common House Martin Delichon urbicum X X X X X X X X White Wagtail Motacilla alba X X
    [Show full text]
  • An Initial Estimate of Avian Ark Kinds
    Answers Research Journal 6 (2013):409–466. www.answersingenesis.org/arj/v6/avian-ark-kinds.pdf An Initial Estimate of Avian Ark Kinds Jean K. Lightner, Liberty University, 1971 University Blvd, Lynchburg, Virginia, 24515. Abstract Creationists recognize that animals were created according to their kinds, but there has been no comprehensive list of what those kinds are. As part of the Answers in Genesis Ark Encounter project, research was initiated in an attempt to more clearly identify and enumerate vertebrate kinds that were SUHVHQWRQWKH$UN,QWKLVSDSHUXVLQJPHWKRGVSUHYLRXVO\GHVFULEHGSXWDWLYHELUGNLQGVDUHLGHQWLÀHG 'XHWRWKHOLPLWHGLQIRUPDWLRQDYDLODEOHDQGWKHIDFWWKDWDYLDQWD[RQRPLFFODVVLÀFDWLRQVVKLIWWKLVVKRXOG be considered only a rough estimate. Keywords: Ark, kinds, created kinds, baraminology, birds Introduction As in mammals and amphibians, the state of avian $VSDUWRIWKH$UN(QFRXQWHUSURMHFW$QVZHUVLQ WD[RQRP\LVLQÁX['HVSLWHWKHLGHDORIQHDWO\QHVWHG Genesis initiated and funded research in an attempt hierarchies in taxonomy, it seems groups of birds to more clearly identify and enumerate the vertebrate are repeatedly “changing nests.” This is partially NLQGVWKDWZHUHSUHVHQWRQWKH$UN,QDQLQLWLDOSDSHU because where an animal is placed depends on which WKH FRQFHSW RI ELEOLFDO NLQGV ZDV GLVFXVVHG DQG D characteristics one chooses to consider. While many strategy to identify them was outlined (Lightner et al. had thought that molecular data would resolve these 6RPHRIWKHNH\SRLQWVDUHQRWHGEHORZ issues, in some cases it has exacerbated them. For this There is tremendous variety seen today in animal HVWLPDWHRIWKHDYLDQ$UNNLQGVWKHWD[RQRPLFVFKHPH OLIHDVFUHDWXUHVKDYHPXOWLSOLHGDQGÀOOHGWKHHDUWK presented online by the International Ornithologists’ since the Flood (Genesis 8:17). In order to identify 8QLRQ ,28 ZDVXVHG *LOODQG'RQVNHUD which modern species are related, being descendants 2012b and 2013). This list includes information on RI D VLQJOH NLQG LQWHUVSHFLÀF K\EULG GDWD LV XWLOL]HG extant and some recently extinct species.
    [Show full text]
  • Divergent and Parallel Routes of Biochemical Adaptation in High-Altitude Passerine Birds from the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau
    Divergent and parallel routes of biochemical adaptation in high-altitude passerine birds from the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau Xiaojia Zhua,b,1, Yuyan Guana,b,1, Anthony V. Signorec, Chandrasekhar Natarajanc, Shane G. DuBayd,e, Yalin Chenga,b, Naijian Hana, Gang Songa, Yanhua Qua, Hideaki Moriyamac, Federico G. Hoffmannf,g, Angela Fagoh, Fumin Leia,b,2, and Jay F. Storzc,2 aKey Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Evolution, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100101 Beijing, China; bUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100049 Beijing, China; cSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68588; dCommittee on Evolutionary Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637; eLife Sciences Section, Integrative Research Center, Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, IL 60605; fDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Entomology, and Plant Pathology, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762; gInstitute for Genomics, Biocomputing and Biotechnology, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762; and hDepartment of Bioscience, Aarhus University, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark Edited by Cynthia M. Beall, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, and approved January 17, 2018 (received for review November 25, 2017) When different species experience similar selection pressures, the native species have followed similar or different routes of high- probability of evolving similar adaptive solutions may be influenced altitude adaptation (2). The two highest elevation plateaus in the by legacies of evolutionary history, such as lineage-specific changes world, the Andean Altiplano in South America and the Qinghai- in genetic background. Here we test for adaptive convergence in Tibet Plateau in Asia, have very different physiographic and hemoglobin (Hb) function among high-altitude passerine birds that biogeographic histories and are inhabited by members of phy- are native to the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, and we examine whether logenetically distinct faunas.
    [Show full text]
  • Birds of Latvia
    Birds of Latvia Checklist with remarks about species occurrence All species known to have occured in Latvia are listed in systematic order (based on Voous sequence) following guidelines of Association of European Rarities Committees. The key to each abbreviated status is as follows. Small letters rather than capitals signify a scarcer distribution - less than 10 records for Latvia until 16.08.2010. The avifauna of Latvia includes a total of 344 species. Place for subspecies or new entries you will find at the end of this list. CB - casual breeder MB - migrant breeder PM - passage migrant RB - resident breeder WV - winter visitor SV - summer visitor V - vagrant E - escaped or recently introduced Name, route, dates etc. Categories used for the national list: Category A - species which has been recorded in an apparently wild state at least once since 1.1.1950 [Majority of the species - are not marked in the categories’ column]. Category B - species which has been recorded in an apparently wild state only between 1800 and 1949 Category C - released or escaped species which has established a self-supporting breeding population in the own country; also birds coming from a category C population of another country (with the species not breeding in the own country). ----------------------------------------- Category D - every species unless it is almost certainly a genuine vagrant (in which case it enters Cat. A), or almost certainly an escape from captivity (Cat. E). Here also these species, which has been found dead at the sea-shore and there is doubt about their death within Latvian territory or beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • Tour Report 3Rd – 9Th October 2020
    Autumn in the Cairngorms Naturetrek Tour Report 3rd – 9th October 2020 Crested Tit Pine Marten Red Grouse Red Deer Report and images compiled by Tom Brereton Naturetrek Mingledown Barn Wolf's Lane Chawton Alton Hampshire GU34 3HJ UK T: +44 (0)1962 733051 E: [email protected] W: www.naturetrek.co.uk Tour Report Autumn in the Cairngorms Tour participants: Tom Brereton (Leader) with five Naturetrek clients Day 1 Saturday 3rd October The trip started with the collection of four clients from a dull and rainy Inverness Airport. En route to our afternoon destination, we made a brief stop at Alturie located along the southern margin of the Moray Firth east of Inverness, where there were numerous coastal wildfowl including Wigeon, Teal, Eider and best of all a Slavonian Grebe. A Hooded Crow was also seen. We also stopped at a supermarket nearby to buy some goodies for the trip mainly in the form of drinks for evenings at the guest house. We then drove on to Insh Marhses RSPB where we met the other guest on this holiday. Insh is a wonderful reserve for all forms of wildlife including fungi, and there were several Fly Agaric visible under woodland right by the car park. During the afternoon we made a short walk to the two hides picking up en route Goldcrest and Redwing. From the hides, we saw Roe Deer, Teal, Oystercatcher, Snipe, Grey Heron and a small flock of Swallow . Late afternoon, after a tiring day of travel, we headed to our accommodation for the holiday, Ballintean Mountain Lodge, fabulously located in beautiful Glenfeshie.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematic Notes on Asian Birds. 49 a Preliminary Review of the Aegithalidae, Remizidae and Paridae1
    Systematic notes on Asian birds. 49 A preliminary review of the Aegithalidae, Remizidae and Paridae1 S. Eck † & J. Martens Eck, S. & J. Martens. Systematic notes on Asian birds. 49. A preliminary review of the Aegithalidae, Remi- zidae and Paridae. Zool. Med. Leiden 80-5 (1), 21.xii.2006: 1-63, fi gs. 1-6, Plates I-III.— ISSN 0024-0672. Siegfried Eck †, formerly Staatliche Sammlungen für Naturkunde Dresden, Museum für Tierkunde, Königsbrücker Landstrasse 159, D-01109 Dresden, Germany. Jochen Martens, Institut für Zoologie, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, D-55099 Mainz, Germany (e-mail: [email protected]). Key words: Paridae; Aegithalidae; Remizidae; species limits; systematics; taxonomy; eastern Palaearctic region; Indo-Malayan region; morphology; bioacoustics; molecular genetics; secondary contacts; hy- bridisation; introgression. Proposed recent taxonomic changes in Paridae, Aegithalidae, and Remizidae are reviewed within the geographic scope of this series and their reliability is discussed in terms of the Biological Species Concept with respect to secondary contacts, hybridization, introgression, bioacoustics, and molecular genetics. Certain previously unpublished data are added to support the taxonomic decisions. Introduction This review benefi ts from the excellent treatment of these three passerine families in the monograph by Harrap (1996) 2, preceded by detailed work by Vaurie (1957a, b) on the Palearctic species set upon which Snow (1967) based his treatment for Peters’s Checklist of the Birds of the World. Only after the publication of Harrap (op. cit.) has molecular ge- netics begun to furnish information on parid systematics and taxonomy. This has not only given insights into population structure and population genetics of various taxa, but also helped understanding of species evolution and species limits.
    [Show full text]
  • The Contribution to Wildlife Conservation of an Italian Recovery
    Nature Conservation 44: 1–20 (2021) A peer-reviewed open-access journal doi: 10.3897/natureconservation.44.65528 RESEARCH ARTICLE https://natureconservation.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity conservation The contribution to wildlife conservation of an Italian Recovery Centre Gabriele Dessalvi1, Enrico Borgo2, Loris Galli1 1 Department of Earth, Environmental and Life Sciences (DISTAV), Genoa University, Corso Europa 26, 16132, Genoa, Italy 2 Museum of Natural History “Giacomo Doria”, Via Brigata Liguria, 9, 16121, Genoa, Italy Corresponding author: Loris Galli ([email protected]) Academic editor: Christoph Knogge | Received 5 March 2021 | Accepted 20 April 2021 | Published 10 May 2021 http://zoobank.org/F5D4BBF2-A839-4435-A1BA-83EAF4BA94A9 Citation: Dessalvi G, Borgo E, Galli L (2021) The contribution to wildlife conservation of an Italian Recovery Centre. Nature Conservation 44: 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.44.65528 Abstract Wildlife recovery centres are widespread worldwide and their goal is the rehabilitation of wildlife and the subsequent release of healthy animals to appropriate habitats in the wild. The activity of the Genoese Wild- life Recovery Centre (CRAS) from 2015 to 2020 was analysed to assess its contribution to the conservation of biodiversity and to determine the main factors affecting the survival rate of the most abundant species. In particular, the analyses focused upon the cause, provenance and species of hospitalised animals, the sea- sonal distribution of recoveries and the outcomes of hospitalisation in the different species. In addition, an in-depth analysis of the anthropogenic causes was conducted, with a particular focus on attempts of preda- tion by domestic animals, especially cats.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Study of the Ecology of British Breeding Birds
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Which Species Are We Researching and Why? A Case Study of the Ecology of British Breeding Birds Ailsa J. McKenzie1*, Peter A. Robertson1,2 1 Centre for Wildlife Management, School of Biology, Newcastle University, Ridley Building, Claremont Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom, 2 National Wildlife Management Centre, Animal and Plant Health Agency, Sand Hutton, York, United Kingdom * [email protected] Abstract Our ecological knowledge base is extensive, but the motivations for research are many and varied, leading to unequal species representation and coverage. As this evidence is used to support a wide range of conservation, management and policy actions, it is important that OPEN ACCESS gaps and biases are identified and understood. In this paper we detail a method for quantify- ing research effort and impact at the individual species level, and go on to investigate the Citation: McKenzie AJ, Robertson PA (2015) Which Species Are We Researching and Why? A Case factors that best explain between-species differences in outputs. We do this using British Study of the Ecology of British Breeding Birds. PLoS breeding birds as a case study, producing a ranked list of species based on two scientific ONE 10(7): e0131004. doi:10.1371/journal. publication metrics: total number of papers (a measure of research quantity) and h-index (a pone.0131004 measure of the number of highly cited papers on a topic – an indication of research quality). Editor: Antoni Margalida, University of Lleida, SPAIN Widespread, populous species which are native, resident and in receipt of biodiversity Received: November 3, 2014 action plans produced significantly higher publication metrics.
    [Show full text]
  • Window Birds, Cutwork, Paris 2020, ENG Hq
    Urban Ornithology : Window Birds Cities & Living Beings Cutwork France Paris Office Contact Web 23 rue d’Anjou 6 Avenue René Coty [email protected] cutworkstudio.com 1 / 68 75008 Paris, FR 75014 Paris, FR +31 6 41 17 69 45 instagram: @cutwork Paris | April 2020 To see… 1. Everywhere …………….. 4 2. Trees / Parks …………… 21 3. Water ………………………. 40 4. Seasonal …………………. 55 5. Rareties ………………….. 60 Cutwork France Paris Office Contact Web 23 rue d’Anjou 6 Avenue René Coty [email protected] cutworkstudio.com 2 / 68 75008 Paris, FR 75014 Paris, FR +31 6 41 17 69 45 instagram: @cutwork Paris | April 2020 The City at a Glance In the past few weeks, a lot of friends have asked me: “what’s this bird I’m seeing / hearing from my window ?” There is a large variety of species that we can watch from our windows. A hovering shape, a backlighted figure, a colorful stroke flying around, a dot in the sky. Ornithologists call that a garden list, or a window list – the list of birds you can spot and recognize without even stepping outside. In cities, nature’s sounds have become merely a background, a white noise. We have tuned out. Not only have we grown used to not hearing; we have stopped listening. Yet, without the car's traffic and the grey sound of our activities, the city is not quiet. It warbles, trills, babbles, chatters, cries, croaks, whistles, hoots, sings… But today, our attention has shifted. Anyone of us will instinctively recognize the shape of a logo, even from far away, or in small print at the bottom of a poster.
    [Show full text]