5.4. Changes in the Bird Communities of Sierra Nevada Zamora ,R.1 and Barea-Azcón, J.M.2 1 Andalusian Institute for Earth System Research
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Hungary & Transylvania
Although we had many exciting birds, the ‘Bird of the trip’ was Wallcreeper in 2015. (János Oláh) HUNGARY & TRANSYLVANIA 14 – 23 MAY 2015 LEADER: JÁNOS OLÁH Central and Eastern Europe has a great variety of bird species including lots of special ones but at the same time also offers a fantastic variety of different habitats and scenery as well as the long and exciting history of the area. Birdquest has operated tours to Hungary since 1991, being one of the few pioneers to enter the eastern block. The tour itinerary has been changed a few times but nowadays the combination of Hungary and Transylvania seems to be a settled and well established one and offers an amazing list of European birds. This tour is a very good introduction to birders visiting Europe for the first time but also offers some difficult-to-see birds for those who birded the continent before. We had several tour highlights on this recent tour but certainly the displaying Great Bustards, a majestic pair of Eastern Imperial Eagle, the mighty Saker, the handsome Red-footed Falcon, a hunting Peregrine, the shy Capercaillie, the elusive Little Crake and Corncrake, the enigmatic Ural Owl, the declining White-backed Woodpecker, the skulking River and Barred Warblers, a rare Sombre Tit, which was a write-in, the fluty Red-breasted and Collared Flycatchers and the stunning Wallcreeper will be long remembered. We recorded a total of 214 species on this short tour, which is a respectable tally for Europe. Amongst these we had 18 species of raptors, 6 species of owls, 9 species of woodpeckers and 15 species of warblers seen! Our mammal highlight was undoubtedly the superb views of Carpathian Brown Bears of which we saw ten on a single afternoon! 1 BirdQuest Tour Report: Hungary & Transylvania 2015 www.birdquest-tours.com We also had a nice overview of the different habitats of a Carpathian transect from the Great Hungarian Plain through the deciduous woodlands of the Carpathian foothills to the higher conifer-covered mountains. -
Belarus in Spring
Belarus in Spring Naturetrek Tour Report 6 - 13 May 2012 Report compiled by Attila Steiner Naturetrek Cheriton Mill Cheriton Alresford Hampshire SO24 0NG England T: +44 (0)1962 733051 F: +44 (0)1962 736426 E: [email protected] W: www.naturetrek.co.uk Tour Report Belarus in Spring Tour leaders: Attila Steiner Alexander Duka Participants: Elizabeth Briggs David Briggs Colin Hughes John Skeavington Jillian Bale Roberta Goodall Day 1 Sunday 6th May UK – Minsk – Liaskavichi Our flight from London arrived on time at Minsk International Airport. At the arrival hall Attila and Alexander greeted us. After changing money we had a tasty dinner at the airport restaurant. Then we started the long drive to our first hotel situated on the edge of the famous Pripiat National Park. We arrived at our hotel in Liaskavichi after midnight. After checking in some of us could hear Thrush Nightingale singing and Spotted Crakes calling from the nearby wetland. Day 2 Monday 7th May Liaskavich area of Pripiat National Park It was already sunny and hot outside when we gathered at the minivan ready to explore nearby woodlands and wetlands. As we drove through Liaskavichi we saw our first White Stork nest, one of the hundreds to be seen during the week. Our first stop along the road was for a raptor circling above the fields, which proved to be a Lesser Spotted Eagle. We soon left the main road and took a gravel road towards the woodlands. We stopped to watch a Black Kite flying above the forest. It then landed on top of a dead tree and we had prolonged scope views of this nice raptor. -
Best of the Baltic - Bird List - July 2019 Note: *Species Are Listed in Order of First Seeing Them ** H = Heard Only
Best of the Baltic - Bird List - July 2019 Note: *Species are listed in order of first seeing them ** H = Heard Only July 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th 13th 14th 15th 16th 17th Mute Swan Cygnus olor X X X X X X X X Whopper Swan Cygnus cygnus X X X X Greylag Goose Anser anser X X X X X Barnacle Goose Branta leucopsis X X X Tufted Duck Aythya fuligula X X X X Common Eider Somateria mollissima X X X X X X X X Common Goldeneye Bucephala clangula X X X X X X Red-breasted Merganser Mergus serrator X X X X X Great Cormorant Phalacrocorax carbo X X X X X X X X X X Grey Heron Ardea cinerea X X X X X X X X X Western Marsh Harrier Circus aeruginosus X X X X White-tailed Eagle Haliaeetus albicilla X X X X Eurasian Coot Fulica atra X X X X X X X X Eurasian Oystercatcher Haematopus ostralegus X X X X X X X Black-headed Gull Chroicocephalus ridibundus X X X X X X X X X X X X European Herring Gull Larus argentatus X X X X X X X X X X X X Lesser Black-backed Gull Larus fuscus X X X X X X X X X X X X Great Black-backed Gull Larus marinus X X X X X X X X X X X X Common/Mew Gull Larus canus X X X X X X X X X X X X Common Tern Sterna hirundo X X X X X X X X X X X X Arctic Tern Sterna paradisaea X X X X X X X Feral Pigeon ( Rock) Columba livia X X X X X X X X X X X X Common Wood Pigeon Columba palumbus X X X X X X X X X X X Eurasian Collared Dove Streptopelia decaocto X X X Common Swift Apus apus X X X X X X X X X X X X Barn Swallow Hirundo rustica X X X X X X X X X X X Common House Martin Delichon urbicum X X X X X X X X White Wagtail Motacilla alba X X -
Individual Repeatability, Species Differences, and The
Supplementary Materials: Individual repeatability, species differences, and the influence of socio-ecological factors on neophobia in 10 corvid species SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS 2 Figure S1 . Latency to touch familiar food in each round, across all conditions and species. Round 3 differs from round 1 and 2, while round 1 and 2 do not differ from each other. Points represent individuals, lines represent median. SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS 3 Figure S2 . Site effect on latency to touch familiar food in azure-winged magpie, carrion crow and pinyon jay. SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS 4 Table S1 Pairwise comparisons of latency data between species Estimate Standard error z p-value Blue jay - Azure-winged magpie 0.491 0.209 2.351 0.019 Carrion crow - Azure-winged magpie -0.496 0.177 -2.811 0.005 Clark’s nutcracker - Azure-winged magpie 0.518 0.203 2.558 0.011 Common raven - Azure-winged magpie -0.437 0.183 -2.392 0.017 Eurasian jay - Azure-winged magpie 0.284 0.166 1.710 0.087 ’Alal¯a- Azure-winged magpie 0.416 0.144 2.891 0.004 Large-billed crow - Azure-winged magpie 0.668 0.189 3.540 0.000 New Caledonian crow - Azure-winged magpie -0.316 0.209 -1.513 0.130 Pinyon jay - Azure-winged magpie 0.118 0.170 0.693 0.488 Carrion crow - Blue jay -0.988 0.199 -4.959 0.000 Clark’s nutcracker - Blue jay 0.027 0.223 0.122 0.903 Common raven - Blue jay -0.929 0.205 -4.537 0.000 Eurasian jay - Blue jay -0.207 0.190 -1.091 0.275 ’Alal¯a- Blue jay -0.076 0.171 -0.443 0.658 Large-billed crow - Blue jay 0.177 0.210 0.843 0.399 New Caledonian crow - Blue jay -0.808 0.228 -3.536 -
Habitat Use and Population Dynamics of the Azure-Winged Magpie, Cyanopica Cyanus, and Their Response to Fire in Northern Mongolia
Lincoln University Digital Thesis Copyright Statement The digital copy of this thesis is protected by the Copyright Act 1994 (New Zealand). This thesis may be consulted by you, provided you comply with the provisions of the Act and the following conditions of use: you will use the copy only for the purposes of research or private study you will recognise the author's right to be identified as the author of the thesis and due acknowledgement will be made to the author where appropriate you will obtain the author's permission before publishing any material from the thesis. Habitat Use and Population Dynamics of the Azure-Winged Magpie, Cyanopica cyanus, and their Response to Fire in Northern Mongolia A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of International Nature Conservation (M.I.N.C) at Lincoln University by Haojin Tan Lincoln University, New Zealand/ Georg-August University, Germany 2011 The Azure-winged Magpie Cyanopica cyanus in Khonin Nuga, Northern Mongolia. Photo by Kerry- Jayne Wilson (2010) ii Abstract of a thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of International Nature Conservation Abstract Habitat Use and Population Dynamics of the Azure-winged Magpie, Cyanopica cyanus, and their Response to Fire in Northern Mongolia by Haojin Tan Fires are natural distubances in many ecosystems, but humans have altered fire regimes throughout the world. The effect of fire on organisms, particularly birds, depend on the extent and regime of the fire and the species’ ecology. The Azure-winged Magpie, Cyanopica cyanus is a cooperative breeder, and occurs in a disjunct distribution across much of Asia and in Iberia (Portugal and Spain). -
Niche Analysis and Conservation of Bird Species Using Urban Core Areas
sustainability Article Niche Analysis and Conservation of Bird Species Using Urban Core Areas Vasilios Liordos 1,* , Jukka Jokimäki 2 , Marja-Liisa Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki 2, Evangelos Valsamidis 1 and Vasileios J. Kontsiotis 1 1 Department of Forest and Natural Environment Sciences, International Hellenic University, 66100 Drama, Greece; [email protected] (E.V.); [email protected] (V.J.K.) 2 Arctic Centre, University of Lapland, 96101 Rovaniemi, Finland; jukka.jokimaki@ulapland.fi (J.J.); marja-liisa.kaisanlahti@ulapland.fi (M.-L.K.-J.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Knowing the ecological requirements of bird species is essential for their successful con- servation. We studied the niche characteristics of birds in managed small-sized green spaces in the urban core areas of southern (Kavala, Greece) and northern Europe (Rovaniemi, Finland), during the breeding season, based on a set of 16 environmental variables and using Outlying Mean Index, a multivariate ordination technique. Overall, 26 bird species in Kavala and 15 in Rovaniemi were recorded in more than 5% of the green spaces and were used in detailed analyses. In both areas, bird species occupied different niches of varying marginality and breadth, indicating varying responses to urban environmental conditions. Birds showed high specialization in niche position, with 12 species in Kavala (46.2%) and six species in Rovaniemi (40.0%) having marginal niches. Niche breadth was narrower in Rovaniemi than in Kavala. Species in both communities were more strongly associated either with large green spaces located further away from the city center and having a high vegetation cover (urban adapters; e.g., Common Chaffinch (Fringilla coelebs), European Greenfinch (Chloris Citation: Liordos, V.; Jokimäki, J.; chloris Cyanistes caeruleus Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki, M.-L.; ), Eurasian Blue Tit ( )) or with green spaces located closer to the city center Valsamidis, E.; Kontsiotis, V.J. -
Federal Register/Vol. 85, No. 74/Thursday, April 16, 2020/Notices
21262 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 74 / Thursday, April 16, 2020 / Notices acquisition were not included in the 5275 Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, VA Comment (1): We received one calculation for TDC, the TDC limit would not 22041–3803; (703) 358–2376. comment from the Western Energy have exceeded amongst other items. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Alliance, which requested that we Contact: Robert E. Mulderig, Deputy include European starling (Sturnus Assistant Secretary, Office of Public Housing What is the purpose of this notice? vulgaris) and house sparrow (Passer Investments, Office of Public and Indian Housing, Department of Housing and Urban The purpose of this notice is to domesticus) on the list of bird species Development, 451 Seventh Street SW, Room provide the public an updated list of not protected by the MBTA. 4130, Washington, DC 20410, telephone (202) ‘‘all nonnative, human-introduced bird Response: The draft list of nonnative, 402–4780. species to which the Migratory Bird human-introduced species was [FR Doc. 2020–08052 Filed 4–15–20; 8:45 am]‘ Treaty Act (16 U.S.C. 703 et seq.) does restricted to species belonging to biological families of migratory birds BILLING CODE 4210–67–P not apply,’’ as described in the MBTRA of 2004 (Division E, Title I, Sec. 143 of covered under any of the migratory bird the Consolidated Appropriations Act, treaties with Great Britain (for Canada), Mexico, Russia, or Japan. We excluded DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 2005; Pub. L. 108–447). The MBTRA states that ‘‘[a]s necessary, the Secretary species not occurring in biological Fish and Wildlife Service may update and publish the list of families included in the treaties from species exempted from protection of the the draft list. -
Corvidae Species Tree
Corvidae I Red-billed Chough, Pyrrhocorax pyrrhocorax Pyrrhocoracinae =Pyrrhocorax Alpine Chough, Pyrrhocorax graculus Ratchet-tailed Treepie, Temnurus temnurus Temnurus Black Magpie, Platysmurus leucopterus Platysmurus Racket-tailed Treepie, Crypsirina temia Crypsirina Hooded Treepie, Crypsirina cucullata Rufous Treepie, Dendrocitta vagabunda Crypsirininae ?Sumatran Treepie, Dendrocitta occipitalis ?Bornean Treepie, Dendrocitta cinerascens Gray Treepie, Dendrocitta formosae Dendrocitta ?White-bellied Treepie, Dendrocitta leucogastra Collared Treepie, Dendrocitta frontalis ?Andaman Treepie, Dendrocitta bayleii ?Common Green-Magpie, Cissa chinensis ?Indochinese Green-Magpie, Cissa hypoleuca Cissa ?Bornean Green-Magpie, Cissa jefferyi ?Javan Green-Magpie, Cissa thalassina Cissinae ?Sri Lanka Blue-Magpie, Urocissa ornata ?White-winged Magpie, Urocissa whiteheadi Urocissa Red-billed Blue-Magpie, Urocissa erythroryncha Yellow-billed Blue-Magpie, Urocissa flavirostris Taiwan Blue-Magpie, Urocissa caerulea Azure-winged Magpie, Cyanopica cyanus Cyanopica Iberian Magpie, Cyanopica cooki Siberian Jay, Perisoreus infaustus Perisoreinae Sichuan Jay, Perisoreus internigrans Perisoreus Gray Jay, Perisoreus canadensis White-throated Jay, Cyanolyca mirabilis Dwarf Jay, Cyanolyca nanus Black-throated Jay, Cyanolyca pumilo Silvery-throated Jay, Cyanolyca argentigula Cyanolyca Azure-hooded Jay, Cyanolyca cucullata Beautiful Jay, Cyanolyca pulchra Black-collared Jay, Cyanolyca armillata Turquoise Jay, Cyanolyca turcosa White-collared Jay, Cyanolyca viridicyanus -
14Th of November 2019
Date: 14th of november 2019 Tour: Half day excursion Oostvaardersplassen Guide: Pim Around 8.30 I met Quentin from Vancouver (Canada) at the small trainstation of Almere Centrum. From here we drove to the nature reserve Oostvaardersplassen. Our first stop was at a viewing point. From a distance we saw a large group of Red deer, on farmland we saw a few smaller Roe deer. We saw our first White tailed eagle of the day, his nickname is “flying door”, because his wingspan is about 2.30 meters! At the moment there are about 10-12 of this large birds in the area and we saw this morning half of this population. In The Netherlands there are about 10 breeding pairs, it al started in the Oostvaardersplassen about 13 years ago. We saw many Common buzzard, Common kestrel and a male Eurasian sparrowhaw was showing well closeby. We saw a large group of Barnacle geese and Greylag geese and a mixed group of hundreds of Northern lapwings and European golden plovers. Also a adult Whooper swan was present. Eurasian sparrowhawk – Oostvaardersplassen – Lelystad. “The whooper swan is a large white swan, bigger than a Bewick's swan. It has a long thin neck, which it usually holds erect, and black legs. Its black bill has a large triangular patch of yellow on it”. Source: Rspb.org. The Whooper swans we saw in the reserve today are mainly from Russia and Finland, a pair stays together for the rest of their live On our second stop, also a viewing point, we saw a juvenile White tailed eagle and two adults in a tree. -
Birds of Latvia
Birds of Latvia Checklist with remarks about species occurrence All species known to have occured in Latvia are listed in systematic order (based on Voous sequence) following guidelines of Association of European Rarities Committees. The key to each abbreviated status is as follows. Small letters rather than capitals signify a scarcer distribution - less than 10 records for Latvia until 16.08.2010. The avifauna of Latvia includes a total of 344 species. Place for subspecies or new entries you will find at the end of this list. CB - casual breeder MB - migrant breeder PM - passage migrant RB - resident breeder WV - winter visitor SV - summer visitor V - vagrant E - escaped or recently introduced Name, route, dates etc. Categories used for the national list: Category A - species which has been recorded in an apparently wild state at least once since 1.1.1950 [Majority of the species - are not marked in the categories’ column]. Category B - species which has been recorded in an apparently wild state only between 1800 and 1949 Category C - released or escaped species which has established a self-supporting breeding population in the own country; also birds coming from a category C population of another country (with the species not breeding in the own country). ----------------------------------------- Category D - every species unless it is almost certainly a genuine vagrant (in which case it enters Cat. A), or almost certainly an escape from captivity (Cat. E). Here also these species, which has been found dead at the sea-shore and there is doubt about their death within Latvian territory or beyond. -
Tour Report 3Rd – 9Th October 2020
Autumn in the Cairngorms Naturetrek Tour Report 3rd – 9th October 2020 Crested Tit Pine Marten Red Grouse Red Deer Report and images compiled by Tom Brereton Naturetrek Mingledown Barn Wolf's Lane Chawton Alton Hampshire GU34 3HJ UK T: +44 (0)1962 733051 E: [email protected] W: www.naturetrek.co.uk Tour Report Autumn in the Cairngorms Tour participants: Tom Brereton (Leader) with five Naturetrek clients Day 1 Saturday 3rd October The trip started with the collection of four clients from a dull and rainy Inverness Airport. En route to our afternoon destination, we made a brief stop at Alturie located along the southern margin of the Moray Firth east of Inverness, where there were numerous coastal wildfowl including Wigeon, Teal, Eider and best of all a Slavonian Grebe. A Hooded Crow was also seen. We also stopped at a supermarket nearby to buy some goodies for the trip mainly in the form of drinks for evenings at the guest house. We then drove on to Insh Marhses RSPB where we met the other guest on this holiday. Insh is a wonderful reserve for all forms of wildlife including fungi, and there were several Fly Agaric visible under woodland right by the car park. During the afternoon we made a short walk to the two hides picking up en route Goldcrest and Redwing. From the hides, we saw Roe Deer, Teal, Oystercatcher, Snipe, Grey Heron and a small flock of Swallow . Late afternoon, after a tiring day of travel, we headed to our accommodation for the holiday, Ballintean Mountain Lodge, fabulously located in beautiful Glenfeshie. -
The Contribution to Wildlife Conservation of an Italian Recovery
Nature Conservation 44: 1–20 (2021) A peer-reviewed open-access journal doi: 10.3897/natureconservation.44.65528 RESEARCH ARTICLE https://natureconservation.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity conservation The contribution to wildlife conservation of an Italian Recovery Centre Gabriele Dessalvi1, Enrico Borgo2, Loris Galli1 1 Department of Earth, Environmental and Life Sciences (DISTAV), Genoa University, Corso Europa 26, 16132, Genoa, Italy 2 Museum of Natural History “Giacomo Doria”, Via Brigata Liguria, 9, 16121, Genoa, Italy Corresponding author: Loris Galli ([email protected]) Academic editor: Christoph Knogge | Received 5 March 2021 | Accepted 20 April 2021 | Published 10 May 2021 http://zoobank.org/F5D4BBF2-A839-4435-A1BA-83EAF4BA94A9 Citation: Dessalvi G, Borgo E, Galli L (2021) The contribution to wildlife conservation of an Italian Recovery Centre. Nature Conservation 44: 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.44.65528 Abstract Wildlife recovery centres are widespread worldwide and their goal is the rehabilitation of wildlife and the subsequent release of healthy animals to appropriate habitats in the wild. The activity of the Genoese Wild- life Recovery Centre (CRAS) from 2015 to 2020 was analysed to assess its contribution to the conservation of biodiversity and to determine the main factors affecting the survival rate of the most abundant species. In particular, the analyses focused upon the cause, provenance and species of hospitalised animals, the sea- sonal distribution of recoveries and the outcomes of hospitalisation in the different species. In addition, an in-depth analysis of the anthropogenic causes was conducted, with a particular focus on attempts of preda- tion by domestic animals, especially cats.