Finnair Annual Report 2013

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Finnair Annual Report 2013 ANNUAL REPORT 2013 20 3 FINNAIR ANNUAL REPORT 2013 STRATEGY / CUSTOMERS / OPERATIONS / EMPLOYEES / SOCIETY / FINANCE / GOVERNANCE / GRI 2 CONTENTS About this report 2 CEO’s review 3 STRATEGY 5 Strategy 6 Megatrends 9 About this report Key Performance Indicators 11 The triple bottom line 12 The Finnair Group’s main field of business is the provision of air transport and travel services. CUSTOMERS 14 The purpose of the Annual Report – encompassing objectives of what were previously published as 19 separate Financial and Sustainability Reports – is to measure and account for the financial, economic, Social indicators social and environmental performance of this enterprise, and to identify and explain the strategic OPERATIONS 21 business ramifications of this performance. Shareholders, investors, analysts, media, customers, Environmental indicators 28 employees, other interested stakeholders and the general public at large comprise the report’s EMPLOYEES 38 intended audience. Social indicators 43 Finnair sees sustainability as a critical and strategic aspect of business performance, thus the Annual SOCIETY 51 Report embeds material sustainability disclosures in its annual reporting framework. The scope of the Stakeholder Engagement 55 report is defined according to the Finnair Group’s material activities in 2013 across all its units. For Social indicators 56 more information on how materiality is determined, see the materiality and stakeholder matrix on FINANCE pages 12–13. 58 The Report of the Board of Directors59 Finnair has a strong presence in social media, and we wanted to try a new form of engagement Financial statements 78 and image gathering. In this annual report we have crowdsourced images through Finnish mobile Financial indicators 123 application Scoopshot. We asked the world’s air travelers to show us what they find magical about GOVERNANCE 125 air travel, what’s the best part of the journey, and what delights them. The task was valid for two 125 weeks, starting from December 10, 2013. The annual report includes also images from our employ- Management principles ees, the cabin attendant Noora Kunttu and the pilot Tomi Tervo. They both have Instagram accounts: Corporate Governance Statement 2013 131 finnairnoora and finnairtomi. Risk management and major risks 142 Remuneration Statement 2013 147 Board of Directors 156 Executive Board 157 Reporting principles 158 GRI matrix 160 Information for shareholders 167 Glossary 168 Contact information 169 FINNAIR ANNUAL REPORT 2013 STRATEGY / CUSTOMERS / OPERATIONS / EMPLOYEES / SOCIETY / FINANCE / GOVERNANCE / GRI 3 CEO’s review 2013 – A year of improving competitiveness airlines. These have put Finnair on the right and reducing costs path toward improved operational quality and Like many recent years, 2013 was eventful for Finnair. For me, it was cost-efficiency. my first year at Finnair. Since the beginning of June, I have learned a great deal about the airline business and Finnair, and the significance The customer is at the heart of what we do. of both to Finland. My meetings with our personnel, customers, Recognising this, we began a strategic devel- business partners, shareholders and other stakeholders have made it opment effort in 2013 aimed at improving our clear that Finnair holds a very special position in the hearts of Finns. service in order to respond to customer needs even better than before, thereby increasing There are strong links between the success of the company’s Asian sales. More information on the results of these strategy and Finnish air connections, which in turn play a signifi- efforts will become available in 2014. cant role in the lives of Finns and the Finnish business sector. Finnair offers connections from Finland to some 60 destinations in Europe Financially, 2013 did not live up to our expec- and 13 destinations in Asia. The strong connections it provides tations. Our turnover fell by two per cent from promote the international success of Finnish industry, while also 2012, totalling 2.4 billion euros. The main factor facilitating investment in Finland by foreign industry. slowing down turnover growth was the fall in The link between the company’s success and Finnish GDP is euro-denominated revenue due to the substan- obvious. Helsinki Airport – our home – is Finland’s second-largest tial depreciation of the Japanese yen, but in the hub of jobs. By being successful, we can create new jobs at Finnair second half of the year the weaker-than-ex- and indirectly create new jobs in other areas of the airline business pected development of cargo and leisure traffic cluster. also contributed to the decrease in turnover for the full year. Our operating profit was -4.8 million euros. This is unsat- Finnair has a very strong brand that we must continue to develop, isfactory, as our target was to record a profit for the year. Our result grow and protect, even as the company undergoes what is perhaps was also affected by tight competition and the continued high price of the largest transformation in its history – a transformation that is fuel. In the fourth quarter, our result was also negatively affected by also painful in certain ways. Our goal is to make Finnair a company measures taken to look after our customers in preparation for labour that combines the best of its 90-year history with the courage to action. Cancelled flights resulted in additional expenses. These costs adapt and learn, allowing it to continue operating as a strong player led to our operating result showing a loss for the full year. in its industry through this period of consolidation. In recent years, the company has concluded many strategic partnerships in the Nevertheless, our goal is to make Finnair a sustainably profitable and area of aviation services, and entered joint businesses with other growing company. Profitable growth is our most important objec- FINNAIR ANNUAL REPORT 2013 STRATEGY / CUSTOMERS / OPERATIONS / EMPLOYEES / SOCIETY / FINANCE / GOVERNANCE / GRI 4 tive. However, we will not be able to grow – or be profitable – unless remain confident that we can work together through the ongoing we improve our cost structure and competitiveness. negotiations to achieve the best possible outcome for the future of Finnair and its personnel. The year 2013 was encouraging in this respect: we achieved the targeted permanent annual cost reduction of 140 million euros set in Finnair is currently preparing for two significant waves of invest- August 2011 ahead of schedule. Cost reductions have been system- ment: In 2015, we will take delivery of the first of our new Airbus atically sought in several different categories, including fleet, avia- 350 long-haul aircraft, and in the coming two years we must also tion service, catering, sales, distribution and personnel costs. Our make decisions on the renewal of our European fleet to ensure progress in the first cost-reduction program shows that, by exam- future competitiveness and energy efficiency. These investments ining things with an open mind, operations can be optimised, are essential for our future, and Finnair must be a strong player in its competitiveness can be improved and the necessary cost reductions industry in order to finance the required capital expenditure. We are can be achieved. convinced that this is possible if we do the right things, at the right time, and in the right way, with courage and an open mind. We have In the collective labour agreements concluded with cabin crew, decided that we will be winners in our industry. pilots and the Finnish Aviation Union IAU, it was agreed that nego- tiations on cost reductions be postponed until the first half of 2014. I would like to extend my warmest thanks to all Finnair personnel The sought cost reductions primarily involve personnel-related costs for the year 2013 and their contribution to achieving our shared in all personnel groups. Our previously set cost reduction targets goals. I also wish to thank our customers, business partners and remain unchanged. shareholders for their trust in the company. Many of our structures associated with wages and working hours Pekka Vauramo originate from the era of closed markets. Renegotiating these struc- tures to match current labour market practices is challenging, but we are determined to move forward with Finnair’s structural changes and cost reductions in cooperation with personnel and their representatives. I hope we will reach company-specific agree- ments on the cost reductions necessary for Finnair and its personnel well ahead of the deadline set for the negotiations. However, at the same time, we must assess other options to prepare for the contin- gency that, despite our best efforts, the necessary agreements on cost reductions are not reached through negotiations. I nevertheless FINNAIR ANNUAL REPORT 2013 STRATEGY / CUSTOMERS / OPERATIONS / EMPLOYEES / SOCIETY / FINANCE / GOVERNANCE / GRI 5 Strategy FINNAIRFINNAIR IN THE IN WORLDTHE MEGATRENDS Digit alisatio n and WORLD nisation con a Urb nect ivity nd l a ica sia m A STRATEGIC FOCUS AREAS no to co er Su e ow st in p ai ft al Cu na hi ic ness stome bi S lit titive r ex lit o mpe peri y p t co enc Cos e In te rn at th io w n ro al g w le in b n ta in fi g o r te P a m years The process of operating and developing Finnair's network in the VISION most ecient way by combining profitable growth, market developments Finnair's customer promise DESIGNED FOR YOU OPERATIONS EXCELLENCE and customer satisfaction To double revenue from Asian trac by 2020 from the 2010 level, to be the most desired option in trac between Asia and Europe, and to be the number one airline in the Nordic countries. FINNAIR ANNUAL REPORT 2013 STRATEGY / CUSTOMERS / OPERATIONS / EMPLOYEES / SOCIETY / FINANCE / GOVERNANCE / GRI 6 STRATEGY Finnair is pursuing business and leisure travellers as well as cargo customers in the fast growing Asian economies, Finland and The core of Finnair’s strategy is taking advantage of the growing particularly those European cities that do not provide direct connec- demand for traffic between Europe and Asia.
Recommended publications
  • List of Representations and Evidence Received
    CAP 1134 Appendix A: List of representations and evidence received APPENDIX A List of representations and evidence received Responses submitted in response to the Gatwick: Market Power Assessment, the CAA’s Initial Views – February 20121 . David Starkie, regulatory and competition economist . Gatwick Airport Limited (GAL) . Virgin Atlantic Airways (VAA) Responses submitted in response to the Consultation on Gatwick Market Power Assessment (CAP 1052)2 . British Airways (BA) . easyJet . GAL . Gatwick Airport Consultative Committee . VAA Stakeholder meetings / teleconference held3 Airlines . Aer Lingus . Air Asia X . Air Berlin . Air Malta . Aurigny 1 Non-confidential versions of these submissions are available on the CAA's website. 2 Non-confidential versions of these submissions are available on the CAA's website. 3 Included in this are airlines that met the CAA Board as part of the consultation process. 1 CAP 1134 Appendix A: List of representations and evidence received . BA . bmi regional . Cathay Pacific . Delta . easyJet . Emirates . Flybe . Jet2 . Lufthansa . Monarch . Norwegian Air Shuttle . Ryanair . Thomas Cook . TUI Travel . VAA . Wizz Air Airport operators: . Birmingham Airport Holdings Limited . East Midlands International Airport Limited . Gatwick Airport Limited . Heathrow Airport Limited . London Luton Airport Operations Limited . London Southend Airport Company Limited . Manchester Airports Group PLC . Stansted Airport Limited 2 CAP 1134 Appendix A: List of representations and evidence received Cargo carriers . British Airways World Cargo . bmi Cargo . DHL . Emirates Sky Cargo . FedEx . Royal Mail . TNT Express Services . [] Other stakeholders . Agility Logistics . Airport Coordination Limited UK . Gatwick Airport Consultative Committee . Stop Stansted Expansion Information gathered under statutory powers (section 73 Airports Act 1986 / section 50 Civil Aviation Act 2012) .
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix A: List of Representations and Evidence Received
    CAP 1133 Appendix A: List of representations and evidence received APPENDIX A List of representations and evidence received Responses submitted in response to the Heathrow: Market Power Assessment, the CAA’s Initial Views – February 20121 . David Starkie, regulatory and competition economist . Heathrow Airport Limited (HAL) . Virgin Atlantic Airways (VAA) Responses submitted in response to the Consultation on Heathrow Market Power Assessment (CAP 1051)2 . HAL . London Airlines Consultative Committee & Heathrow Airline Operators Committee . VAA Stakeholder meetings / teleconference held3 Airlines . Aer Lingus . Air Asia X . Air Berlin . Air Malta . Aurigny 1 Non-confidential versions of these submissions are available on the CAA's website: http://www.caa.co.uk/default.aspx?catid=78&pagetype=90&pageid=12275. 2 Non-confidential versions of these submissions are available on the CAA's website. 3 Included in this are airlines that met the CAA Board as part of the consultation process. 1 CAP 1133 Appendix A: List of representations and evidence received . British Airways . bmi regional . Cathay Pacific . Delta . easyJet . Emirates . Flybe . Jet2 . Lufthansa . Monarch . Norwegian Air Shuttle . Ryanair . Thomas Cook . TUI Travel . VAA . Wizz Air Airport operators: . Birmingham Airport Holdings Limited . East Midlands International Airport Limited . Gatwick Airport Limited . Heathrow Airport Limited . London Luton Airport Operations Limited . London Southend Airport Company Limited . Manchester Airports Group . Stansted Airport Limited 2 CAP 1133 Appendix A: List of representations and evidence received Cargo carriers . British Airways World Cargo . bmi Cargo . DHL . Emirates Sky Cargo . FedEx . IAG Cargo . Royal Mail . Titan Airways . TNT Express Services . Other stakeholders . Agility Logistics . Airport Coordination Limited UK . Gatwick Airport Consultative Committee .
    [Show full text]
  • IATA CLEARING HOUSE PAGE 1 of 21 2021-09-08 14:22 EST Member List Report
    IATA CLEARING HOUSE PAGE 1 OF 21 2021-09-08 14:22 EST Member List Report AGREEMENT : Standard PERIOD: P01 September 2021 MEMBER CODE MEMBER NAME ZONE STATUS CATEGORY XB-B72 "INTERAVIA" LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY B Live Associate Member FV-195 "ROSSIYA AIRLINES" JSC D Live IATA Airline 2I-681 21 AIR LLC C Live ACH XD-A39 617436 BC LTD DBA FREIGHTLINK EXPRESS C Live ACH 4O-837 ABC AEROLINEAS S.A. DE C.V. B Suspended Non-IATA Airline M3-549 ABSA - AEROLINHAS BRASILEIRAS S.A. C Live ACH XB-B11 ACCELYA AMERICA B Live Associate Member XB-B81 ACCELYA FRANCE S.A.S D Live Associate Member XB-B05 ACCELYA MIDDLE EAST FZE B Live Associate Member XB-B40 ACCELYA SOLUTIONS AMERICAS INC B Live Associate Member XB-B52 ACCELYA SOLUTIONS INDIA LTD. D Live Associate Member XB-B28 ACCELYA SOLUTIONS UK LIMITED A Live Associate Member XB-B70 ACCELYA UK LIMITED A Live Associate Member XB-B86 ACCELYA WORLD, S.L.U D Live Associate Member 9B-450 ACCESRAIL AND PARTNER RAILWAYS D Live Associate Member XB-280 ACCOUNTING CENTRE OF CHINA AVIATION B Live Associate Member XB-M30 ACNA D Live Associate Member XB-B31 ADB SAFEGATE AIRPORT SYSTEMS UK LTD. A Live Associate Member JP-165 ADRIA AIRWAYS D.O.O. D Suspended Non-IATA Airline A3-390 AEGEAN AIRLINES S.A. D Live IATA Airline KH-687 AEKO KULA LLC C Live ACH EI-053 AER LINGUS LIMITED B Live IATA Airline XB-B74 AERCAP HOLDINGS NV B Live Associate Member 7T-144 AERO EXPRESS DEL ECUADOR - TRANS AM B Live Non-IATA Airline XB-B13 AERO INDUSTRIAL SALES COMPANY B Live Associate Member P5-845 AERO REPUBLICA S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Liste-Exploitants-Aeronefs.Pdf
    EN EN EN COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, XXX C(2009) XXX final COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No xxx/2009 of on the list of aircraft operators which performed an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC on or after 1 January 2006 specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator (Text with EEA relevance) EN EN COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No xxx/2009 of on the list of aircraft operators which performed an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC on or after 1 January 2006 specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator (Text with EEA relevance) THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a system for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC1, and in particular Article 18a(3)(a) thereof, Whereas: (1) Directive 2003/87/EC, as amended by Directive 2008/101/EC2, includes aviation activities within the scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community (hereinafter the "Community scheme"). (2) In order to reduce the administrative burden on aircraft operators, Directive 2003/87/EC provides for one Member State to be responsible for each aircraft operator. Article 18a(1) and (2) of Directive 2003/87/EC contains the provisions governing the assignment of each aircraft operator to its administering Member State. The list of aircraft operators and their administering Member States (hereinafter "the list") should ensure that each operator knows which Member State it will be regulated by and that Member States are clear on which operators they should regulate.
    [Show full text]
  • 10/29/2019 15:23:37 a DATE: 1 PAGE: EFBUF 11/05-07/19 Pre-Registration List
    DATE:10/29/2019 15:23:37 A PAGE: 1 EFBUF 11/05-07/19 Pre-Registration List **************************************************** MEMBER ORGANIZATION **************************************************** Jason Brown AIR CANADA Kevin Denoncourt AIR CANADA Warren Lampitt AIR CANADA Genseric Perras-Yu AIR CANADA Federico Campochiaro AIR DOLOMITI Pierluigi Cazzadori AIR DOLOMITI Eric Lesage AIRBUS Thierry Paya-Arnaud AIRBUS Francisco Javier Puertas Menina AIRBUS Francisco Javier Utrilla Ceballos AIRBUS Michael Krohn ALASKA AIRLINES Guillermo Ochovo ALASKA AIRLINES Bret Peyton ALASKA AIRLINES Terry Walters ALASKA AIRLINES Hiroshi Eguchi ALL NIPPON AIRWAYS Makoto Kimoto ALL NIPPON AIRWAYS Yasuo Kurakazu ALL NIPPON AIRWAYS Hiroyuki Nonaka ALL NIPPON AIRWAYS Genta Yamanoe ALL NIPPON AIRWAYS Sharitta Allen AMERICAN AIRLINES Allen Barronton AMERICAN AIRLINES Doris Berube AMERICAN AIRLINES Richard Bowman AMERICAN AIRLINES Doug Colcord AMERICAN AIRLINES Charles Durtschi AMERICAN AIRLINES Jeremy Flieg AMERICAN AIRLINES Charles Foulkes AMERICAN AIRLINES Lakshmi Lanka AMERICAN AIRLINES Edward Mackiewicz AMERICAN AIRLINES Brian Norris AMERICAN AIRLINES Todd Ringelstein AMERICAN AIRLINES Philipp Haller AUSTRIAN AIRLINES Dawson Hsu CATHAY PACIFIC AIRWAYS Philippe Lievin COLLINS AEROSPACE Frederic Trincal COLLINS AEROSPACE Denise Vivas COLLINS AEROSPACE Kevin Berger DELTA AIR LINES Alexandria Brown DELTA AIR LINES Matt Eckstein DELTA AIR LINES Lee Fay DELTA AIR LINES Christina Fish DELTA AIR LINES Dan Gradwohl DELTA AIR LINES Ken Plunkett DELTA AIR LINES Charles
    [Show full text]
  • My Personal Callsign List This List Was Not Designed for Publication However Due to Several Requests I Have Decided to Make It Downloadable
    - www.egxwinfogroup.co.uk - The EGXWinfo Group of Twitter Accounts - @EGXWinfoGroup on Twitter - My Personal Callsign List This list was not designed for publication however due to several requests I have decided to make it downloadable. It is a mixture of listed callsigns and logged callsigns so some have numbers after the callsign as they were heard. Use CTL+F in Adobe Reader to search for your callsign Callsign ICAO/PRI IATA Unit Type Based Country Type ABG AAB W9 Abelag Aviation Belgium Civil ARMYAIR AAC Army Air Corps United Kingdom Civil AgustaWestland Lynx AH.9A/AW159 Wildcat ARMYAIR 200# AAC 2Regt | AAC AH.1 AAC Middle Wallop United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 300# AAC 3Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 400# AAC 4Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 500# AAC 5Regt AAC/RAF Britten-Norman Islander/Defender JHCFS Aldergrove United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 600# AAC 657Sqn | JSFAW | AAC Various RAF Odiham United Kingdom Military Ambassador AAD Mann Air Ltd United Kingdom Civil AIGLE AZUR AAF ZI Aigle Azur France Civil ATLANTIC AAG KI Air Atlantique United Kingdom Civil ATLANTIC AAG Atlantic Flight Training United Kingdom Civil ALOHA AAH KH Aloha Air Cargo United States Civil BOREALIS AAI Air Aurora United States Civil ALFA SUDAN AAJ Alfa Airlines Sudan Civil ALASKA ISLAND AAK Alaska Island Air United States Civil AMERICAN AAL AA American Airlines United States Civil AM CORP AAM Aviation Management Corporation United States Civil
    [Show full text]
  • An Encouraging Start to the Year
    FINNAIR GROUP INTERIM REPORT 1 JANUARY - 31 MARCH 2007 An encouraging start to the year Summary of the first quarter’s key figures – Turnover rose 10.0% to 528.5 million euros – Passenger traffic grew 9.3% from the previous year, passenger load factor rose 1.2 percentage points to 75.8% – Unit revenues from flight operations rose by 1.8%, unit costs fell by 2.1% – Operating profit was 13.7 million euros (operating loss 5.2 million euros). – Operational result ie. EBIT, excluding capital gains, changes in the fair value of derivatives, was 5.8 million euros (5.1 million loss) – Profit before taxes was 13.4 million euros (5.2 million loss) – Gearing at the end of the quarter was 16.6% (-10.6%) and gearing adjusted for leasing liabilities was 116.5% (85.0%) – Balance sheet cash and cash equivalents totalled 221.5 million euros (306.7 million) – Equity ratio 36.9% (40.7%) – Equity per share 6.93 euros (7.39) – Earnings per share 0.11 euros (-0.05) – Return on capital employed -0.1% (8.3%) Comparisons made to Q1 in 2006 President and CEO Jukka Hienonen on the first-quarter result: Demand is now strong both in Asian traffic and on European routes, and our market share in Europe-Asia traffic is growing. Development of unit revenues in all types of traffic is positive and unit costs are decreasing, so profitability is improving. We will continue to further expand our Europe-Asia traffic, which will be shown in the improvement of cost structure and operating terms and conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Review 2006
    CONTACT INFORMATION Finnair Plc Helsinki-Vantaa Airport Tietotie 11 A FI-01053 FINNAIR Switchboard +358 9 818 81 www.finnair.com www.finnair.com/group Senior Vice President Communications Christer Haglund Telephone +358 9 818 4007 Fax +358 9 818 4092 [email protected] Senior Vice President and CFO Lasse Heinonen Telephone +358 9 818 4950 Fax +358 9 818 4092 [email protected] Director, Investor Relations Taneli Hassinen Telephone +358 9 818 4976 Fax +358 9 818 4092 [email protected] Investor Relations Telephone +358 9 818 4951 Fax +358 9 818 4092 [email protected] 2006 The 2006 annual report is intended to be a travel guide into the world of Finnair. We are a reliable airline, we have a comprehensive route network and we provide fi rst class service. Our customers are satisfi ed. We realised in time the growth potential of Asian traffi c and got down to work in the company. We could tell people how good our connections are via Helsinki from Europe to Asia and vice versa. A map of Asia and new aircraft. This is good material for a travel guide. Shall we continue with these themes? Christer Haglund, SVP Communications and Jukka Hienonen, President and CEO Indeed. We have already achieved our vision “Best in Northern Skies, European Excellence”. Now we will empha- sise our role in traffi c between Europe and Asia. CONTENTS Information for Shareholders .......................................4 Absolutely. We have a story Key Figures 2006 .........................................................4 of strong growth to tell. Invest in Finnair ...........................................................6 We must remember to mention Traffi c Information and Fleet ........................................7 that we are in strong shape Review by the President & CEO .....................................9 fi nancially, as we start to On Finnish Wings to the Ends of the Earth .................10 invest in a new Asian fl eet.
    [Show full text]
  • Monthly OTP July 2019
    Monthly OTP July 2019 ON-TIME PERFORMANCE AIRLINES Contents On-Time is percentage of flights that depart or arrive within 15 minutes of schedule. Global OTP rankings are only assigned to all Airlines/Airports where OAG has status coverage for at least 80% of the scheduled flights. Regional Airlines Status coverage will only be based on actual gate times rather than estimated times. This July result in some airlines / airports being excluded from this report. If you would like to review your flight status feed with OAG pleas [email protected] MAKE SMARTER MOVES Airline Monthly OTP – July 2019 Page 1 of 1 Home GLOBAL AIRLINES – TOP 50 AND BOTTOM 50 TOP AIRLINE ON-TIME FLIGHTS On-time performance BOTTOM AIRLINE ON-TIME FLIGHTS On-time performance Airline Arrivals Rank No. flights Size Airline Arrivals Rank No. flights Size SATA International-Azores GA Garuda Indonesia 93.9% 1 13,798 52 S4 30.8% 160 833 253 Airlines S.A. XL LATAM Airlines Ecuador 92.0% 2 954 246 ZI Aigle Azur 47.8% 159 1,431 215 HD AirDo 90.2% 3 1,806 200 OA Olympic Air 50.6% 158 7,338 92 3K Jetstar Asia 90.0% 4 2,514 168 JU Air Serbia 51.6% 157 3,302 152 CM Copa Airlines 90.0% 5 10,869 66 SP SATA Air Acores 51.8% 156 1,876 196 7G Star Flyer 89.8% 6 1,987 193 A3 Aegean Airlines 52.1% 155 5,446 114 BC Skymark Airlines 88.9% 7 4,917 122 WG Sunwing Airlines Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Department of Transportation Federal
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ORDER TRANSPORTATION JO 7340.2E FEDERAL AVIATION Effective Date: ADMINISTRATION July 24, 2014 Air Traffic Organization Policy Subject: Contractions Includes Change 1 dated 11/13/14 https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/atpubs/CNT/3-3.HTM A 3- Company Country Telephony Ltr AAA AVICON AVIATION CONSULTANTS & AGENTS PAKISTAN AAB ABELAG AVIATION BELGIUM ABG AAC ARMY AIR CORPS UNITED KINGDOM ARMYAIR AAD MANN AIR LTD (T/A AMBASSADOR) UNITED KINGDOM AMBASSADOR AAE EXPRESS AIR, INC. (PHOENIX, AZ) UNITED STATES ARIZONA AAF AIGLE AZUR FRANCE AIGLE AZUR AAG ATLANTIC FLIGHT TRAINING LTD. UNITED KINGDOM ATLANTIC AAH AEKO KULA, INC D/B/A ALOHA AIR CARGO (HONOLULU, UNITED STATES ALOHA HI) AAI AIR AURORA, INC. (SUGAR GROVE, IL) UNITED STATES BOREALIS AAJ ALFA AIRLINES CO., LTD SUDAN ALFA SUDAN AAK ALASKA ISLAND AIR, INC. (ANCHORAGE, AK) UNITED STATES ALASKA ISLAND AAL AMERICAN AIRLINES INC. UNITED STATES AMERICAN AAM AIM AIR REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AIM AIR AAN AMSTERDAM AIRLINES B.V. NETHERLANDS AMSTEL AAO ADMINISTRACION AERONAUTICA INTERNACIONAL, S.A. MEXICO AEROINTER DE C.V. AAP ARABASCO AIR SERVICES SAUDI ARABIA ARABASCO AAQ ASIA ATLANTIC AIRLINES CO., LTD THAILAND ASIA ATLANTIC AAR ASIANA AIRLINES REPUBLIC OF KOREA ASIANA AAS ASKARI AVIATION (PVT) LTD PAKISTAN AL-AAS AAT AIR CENTRAL ASIA KYRGYZSTAN AAU AEROPA S.R.L. ITALY AAV ASTRO AIR INTERNATIONAL, INC. PHILIPPINES ASTRO-PHIL AAW AFRICAN AIRLINES CORPORATION LIBYA AFRIQIYAH AAX ADVANCE AVIATION CO., LTD THAILAND ADVANCE AVIATION AAY ALLEGIANT AIR, INC. (FRESNO, CA) UNITED STATES ALLEGIANT AAZ AEOLUS AIR LIMITED GAMBIA AEOLUS ABA AERO-BETA GMBH & CO., STUTTGART GERMANY AEROBETA ABB AFRICAN BUSINESS AND TRANSPORTATIONS DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF AFRICAN BUSINESS THE CONGO ABC ABC WORLD AIRWAYS GUIDE ABD AIR ATLANTA ICELANDIC ICELAND ATLANTA ABE ABAN AIR IRAN (ISLAMIC REPUBLIC ABAN OF) ABF SCANWINGS OY, FINLAND FINLAND SKYWINGS ABG ABAKAN-AVIA RUSSIAN FEDERATION ABAKAN-AVIA ABH HOKURIKU-KOUKUU CO., LTD JAPAN ABI ALBA-AIR AVIACION, S.L.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impacts of Liberalization on Competition on an Air Shuttle Market
    The Impacts of Liberalization on Competition on an Air Shuttle Market Alessandro V. M. Oliveira§ Abstract This paper aims at assessing the impacts of deregulation on the most important airline market in Brazil: the air shuttle Rio de Janeiro – São Paulo. By making use of both a two-stages budgeting representation of the demand system, and a competition model with product heterogeneity among rivals, and based on the framework of the New Empirical Industrial Organization (NEIO), it was possible to infer whether a structural change on airlines' conduct parameters due to liberalization was observed. This exercise ultimately served as a test of the efficacy of the policy employed by the regulators since 1998. The main conclusions were that regulatory reform effectively stimulated firms to significantly increase the degree of competition in the market (via a decrease in market power), and that marginal-cost or even below-marginal-cost pricing was not rejected for some airlines. JEL: L13 – L50 – L93 Key words: deregulation – market power – conduct – airline Note: Paper competing to the Young Economist Award. § Center for Studies of Airline Competition and Regulation (NECTAR) - Instituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica, Brazil. E-mail address: [email protected] 1. Introduction This paper aims at developing an empirical model for assessing the impacts of economic liberalization on competition in a relevant subset of the Brazilian airline industry: the air shuttle service on the route Rio de Janeiro - São Paulo. In this market the first air shuttle in the world, the ‘Ponte Aérea’, was created in 1959, by an agreement of airline managers, and had a dominant position in the airport-pair linking both city centers for almost forty years.
    [Show full text]
  • Airlines and Subsidy: Our Position ¬
    Airlines and subsidy: our position ¬ Myth Airline subsidies are a “Gulf” problem FACT Market-distorting subsidies and government support are sadly present in every world region Myth Emirates is subsidised FACT Completely unsubsidised. We campaign against airline subsidies Myth Emirates accesses cheap or free fuel FACT False. We buy fuel from BP, Shell and Chevron in Dubai and worldwide at market rates Myth US and European airlines received support decades ago but are now subsidy-free FACT Bankruptcy protection and government bailouts continue to exist Airlines and subsidy: our position ¬ We understand that despite no evidence, an oft repeated myth can ultimately be accepted as conventional wisdom. In this document you will find our views on subsidy in the airline industry, thorough explanations about Emirates’ business model and our response to misrepresentations that have been levelled against us - from claims about subsidised fuel, financial support and staff conditions to environmental regulation and airport charges. Emirates believes: • A common set of transparent financial reporting metrics to measure and apply against all international carriers should be determined by IATA and ICAO on what defines a subsidy. • Governments should not provide injections, borrowings or financing to airlines, regardless of shareholding status. • All governments should pursue liberalisation and open skies with the objective to end the greatest subsidy of all – aero-political protection. Tim Clark, President, Emirates Airline 1 Contents ¬ Introduction
    [Show full text]