Programming Tools User Guide
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
LPC-Link2 Debug Probe Firmware Programming Rev
LPC-Link2 Debug Probe Firmware Programming Rev. 2.1.0 — 22 January, 2020 User Guide NXP Semiconductors LPC-Link2 Debug Probe Firmware Programming 22 January, 2020 Copyright © 2015-2018 NXP Semiconductors All rights reserved. LPC-Link2 Debug Probe Firmware Programming - All information provided in this document is subject to legal disclaimers © 2015-2018 NXP Semiconductors. All rights reserved. User Guide Rev. 2.1.0 — 22 January, 2020 ii NXP Semiconductors LPC-Link2 Debug Probe Firmware Programming 1. Revision History .................................................................................................. 1 1.1. 2.1.1 ........................................................................................................ 1 1.2. v2.0.0 ....................................................................................................... 1 1.3. v1.8.2 ....................................................................................................... 1 1.4. v1.5.2 ....................................................................................................... 1 1.5. v1.5 ......................................................................................................... 1 2. Introduction ......................................................................................................... 2 3. Quick Start .......................................................................................................... 3 4. Debug Firmware Variants and Drivers ................................................................. -
Management of Programmable Safety Systems
MANAGEMENT OF PROGRAMMABLE SAFETY SYSTEMS erhtjhtyhy JOE LENNER Argonne National Laboratory Advanced Photon Source Safety Interlocks Group 9/11/2019 MANAGEMENT OF PROGRAMMABLE SAFETY SYSTEMS Applicable Standards . IEC 61508 is the parent standard – Applicable in any situation – Used when no applicable child IEC 61800-5-2 standard exists Elec Drives – Very general, many requirements are EN 50128 Railway overly complex ISO 13849 . Child Standards Machinery IEC – Specialize the requirements of IEC 60601 61508 61508 for a specific application Medical Dev IEC 62061 – If you meet the requirements of the Machinery child, you meet the relevant IEC 61511 IEC Process Ind. 50156 requirements of 61508 Furnaces . Best fit for Accelerators – IEC 62061 – ISO 13849 – IEC 61511 2 MANAGEMENT OF PROGRAMMABLE SAFETY SYSTEMS Certified hardware benefits . Use of a single PLC – Eliminates redundant systems and associated wiring. – Ability to clearly separate safety from non-safety tasks – Built-in diagnostics – Safety I/O allows reduction of relays . Programming – Use of certified and proven functions reduces programming effort • Easier to apply = Less errors – Reduces safety and standard programs/tasks • Reduced size of safety program • Reduces review & test time 3 MANAGEMENT OF PROGRAMMABLE SAFETY SYSTEMS Vendor Software Management . Programming tool updates – Only when necessary • The “Microsoft“ effect • Development platform support . Firmware Updates – Quarterly reviews unless alert 4 MANAGEMENT OF PROGRAMMABLE SAFETY SYSTEMS Software . The latest generation -
Customer PPT Rev 30
LATTICE SEMICONDUCTOR The Leader in Low Power, Small Form Factor, Secure FPGAs First Quarter, 2019 Lattice Semiconductor (NASDAQ: LSCC) [1] Safe Harbor This presentation contains forward-looking statements that involve estimates, assumptions, risks and uncertainties, including all information under the heading 1Q 19 Business Outlook. Lattice believes the factors identified below could cause our actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. Factors that may cause our actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements in this presentation include global economic uncertainty, overall semiconductor market conditions, market acceptance and demand for our new and existing products, the Company's dependencies on its silicon wafer suppliers, the impact of competitive products and pricing, and technological and product development risks. In addition, actual results are subject to other risks and uncertainties that relate more broadly to our overall business, including those risks more fully described in Lattice’s filings with the SEC including its annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 30, 2017 and its quarterly filings on Form 10-Q. Certain information in this presentation is identified as having been prepared on a non-GAAP basis. Management uses non- GAAP measures to better assess operating performance and to establish operational goals. Non-GAAP information should not be viewed by investors as a substitute for data prepared in accordance with GAAP. You should not unduly rely on forward-looking statements because actual results could differ materially from those expressed in any forward- looking statements. In addition, any forward-looking statement applies only as of the date on which it is made. -
FPGA Design Security Issues: Using the Ispxpga® Family of Fpgas to Achieve High Design Security
White Paper FPGA Design Security Issues: Using the ispXPGA® Family of FPGAs to Achieve High Design Security December 2003 5555 Northeast Moore Court Hillsboro, Oregon 97124 USA Telephone: (503) 268-8000 FAX: (503) 268-8556 www.latticesemi.com WP1010 Using the ispXPGA Family of FPGAs to Lattice Semiconductor Achieve High Design Security Introduction In today’s complex systems, FPGAs are increasingly being used to replace functions traditionally performed by ASICs and even microprocessors. Ten years ago, the FPGA was at the fringe of most designs; today it is often at the heart. With FPGA technology taking gate counts into the millions, a trend accelerated by embedded ASIC-like functionality, the functions performed by the FPGA make an increasingly attractive target for piracy. Many tech- niques have been developed over the years to steal designs from all types of silicon chips. Special considerations must now be made when thinking about protecting valuable Intellectual Property (IP) implemented within the FPGA. The most common FPGA technology in use today is SRAM-based, which is fast and re-configurable, but must be re-configured every time the FPGA is powered up. Typically, an external PROM is used to hold the configuration data for the FPGA. The link between the PROM and FPGA represents a significant security risk. The configuration data is exposed and vulnerable to piracy while the device powers up. Using a non-volatile-based FPGA eliminates this security risk. Traditionally, non-volatile FPGAs were based on Antifuse technology that is secure, but very expensive to use due to its one-time programmability and higher manufacturing costs. -
Visual Programming: a Programming Tool for Increasing Mathematics Achivement
ARTICLES VISUAL PROGRAMMING: A PROGRAMMING TOOL FOR INCREASING MATHEMATICS ACHIVEMENT By CHERYL SWANIER * CHERYL D. SEALS ** ELODIE BILLIONNIERE *** * Associate Professor, Mathematics and Computer Science Department, Fort Valley State University ** Associate Professor, Computer Science and Software Engineering Department, Auburn University *** Doctoral Student, Computer Science and Engineering Department, Arizona State University ABSTRACT This paper aims to address the need of increasing student achievement in mathematics using a visual programming language such as Scratch. This visual programming language facilitates creating an environment where students in K-12 education can develop mathematical simulations while learning a visual programming language at the same time. Furthermore, the study of visual programming tools as a means to increase student achievement in mathematics could possibly generate interests within the computer-supported collaborative learning community. According to Jerome Bruner in Children Learn By Doing, "knowing how something is put together is worth a thousand facts about it. It permits you to go beyond it” (Bruner, 1984, p.183). Keywords : Achievement, Creativity, End User Programming, Mathematics Education, K-12, Learning, Scratch, Squeak, Visual Programming INTRODUCTION programming language as a tool to create Across the nation, math scores lag (Lewin, 2006). Students mathematical tutorials. Additionally, this paper provides a are performing lower than ever. Lewin reports, for “the modicum of information as it relates to the educational second time in a generation, education officials are value of visual programming to mathematical rethinking the teaching of math in American schools” achievement. Peppler and Kafai (2007) indicate “game (p.1). It is imperative that higher education, industry, and players program their own games and learn about K-12 collaborate to ascertain a viable solution to the software and interface design. -
Handoutshandouts
HandoutsHandouts FPGA-related documents 1. Introduction to Verilog, P. M. Nyasulu and J. Knight, Carleton University, 2003 (Ottawa, Canada). 2. Quick Reference for Verilog HDL, R. Madhavan, AMBIT Design Systems, Inc, Automata Publishing Company, 1995 (San Jose, CA). Project-related documents 3. Project Guidelines and Project Specifications. (I’ll hand these out in lab) IntroductionIntroduction toto FPGAsFPGAs Outline: 1. What’s an FPGA ? Æ logic element “fabric”, i.e. logic gates + memory + clock trigger handling. 2. What’s so good about FPGAs ? Æ FPGA applications and capabilities Æ FPGAs for physicists 3. How do you program an FPGA ? Æ Intro to Quartus II Æ Schematic design Æ Verilog HDL design WhatWhat’’ss anan FPGAFPGA An FPGA is: - a Field Programmable Gate Array. - a programmable breadboard for digital circuits on chip. The FPGA consists of: - programmable Logic Elements (LEs). - programmable interconnects. - custom circuitry (i.e. multipliers, phase- lock loops (PLL), memory, etc …). Programmable Programmable Interconnects Logic [Figure adapted from Low Energy FPGAs – Architecture and Design, by V. George and J. M. Rabaey, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston (2001).] LogicLogic ElementElement (LE)(LE) An FPGA consists of a giant array of interconnected logic elements (LEs). The LEs are identical and consist of inputs, a Look-Up Table (LUT), a little bit of memory, some clock trigger handling circuitry, and output wires. global LUTLUT inputs inputs outputs local outputs MemoryMemory local clock (a few bits) CLOCK triggers signals feedback Figure: Architecture of a single Logic Element InterconnectInterconnect ArchitecturesArchitectures Row-Column Architecture Island Style Architecture Sea-of-Gates Architecture Hierarchical Architecture FPGAFPGA devicesdevices (I)(I) 2 primary manufacturers: 1. -
The Community Is the Infrastructure: a Short Discussion of the Petsc Community
The Community is the Infrastructure: A Short Discussion of the PETSc Community Mark Adams1, Jed Brown2, Satish Balay3, Victor Eijkhout4, Jacob Faibussowitsch5, Fande Kong6, Matthew Knepley7, Scott Kruger8, Oana Marin3, Richard Tran Mills3, Todd Munson3, Patrick Sanan9, Barry F. Smith10, Hong Zhang11, Hong Zhang3, and Junchao Zhang3 1Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 2University of Colorado at Boulder 3Argonne National Laboratory 4The University of Texas at Austin 5University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 6Idaho National Laboratory 7University of New York at Buffalo 8Tech-X Corporation 9ETH Zurich 10Argonne Associate, Argonne National Laboratory 11Illinois Institute of Technology July 5, 2021 Abstract Hard and soft infrastructure work in tandem to accomplish a particular enterprise. Soft infras- tructure { the formal and informal culture, institutions, standards, practices, and procedures that support an enterprise { is often more important to human endeavors than hard infrastructure. For example, a highway system's hard infrastructure (e.g., the roads) could not satisfy its enterprise { effective transportation | without the corresponding soft infrastructure of regulations, policing, driver habits, maintenance crews, and so forth. The relative cost and importance of the different aspects of infrastructure evolves, particularly during the development stages, from planning, to construction, to commissioning, operation, maintenance, and upgrading. The design, development, support, and dissemination of computer software is an archetypal example of soft infrastructure, regularly being the tail that wags the dog of computer hardware (prototypical hard infrastructure). Quantifying soft infrastructure is more difficult than hard in- frastructure. Thus, it is often ignored or under-emphasized when analyzing or proposing changes to human-developed systems. In particular, government understanding and funding of scientific soft infrastructure lags well behind that of hard infrastructure (for example, experimental devices such as accelerators). -
10 Gbps TCP/IP Streams from the FPGA for High Energy Physics
10 Gbps TCP/IP streams from the FPGA for High Energy Physics The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation Bauer, Gerry, Tomasz Bawej, Ulf Behrens, James Branson, Olivier Chaze, Sergio Cittolin, Jose Antonio Coarasa, et al. “10 Gbps TCP/ IP Streams from the FPGA for High Energy Physics.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 513, no. 1 (June 11, 2014): 012042. As Published http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/513/1/012042 Publisher IOP Publishing Version Final published version Citable link http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/98279 Terms of Use Creative Commons Attribution Detailed Terms http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Home Search Collections Journals About Contact us My IOPscience 10 Gbps TCP/IP streams from the FPGA for High Energy Physics This content has been downloaded from IOPscience. Please scroll down to see the full text. 2014 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 513 012042 (http://iopscience.iop.org/1742-6596/513/1/012042) View the table of contents for this issue, or go to the journal homepage for more Download details: IP Address: 18.51.1.88 This content was downloaded on 27/08/2015 at 19:03 Please note that terms and conditions apply. 20th International Conference on Computing in High Energy and Nuclear Physics (CHEP2013) IOP Publishing Journal of Physics: Conference Series 513 (2014) 012042 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/513/1/012042 10 Gbps TCP/IP streams from the FPGA for High Energy Physics Gerry Bauer6, Tomasz Bawej2, Ulf Behrens1, James Branson4, Olivier Chaze2, -
FPGA Design Guide
FPGA Design Guide Lattice Semiconductor Corporation 5555 NE Moore Court Hillsboro, OR 97124 (503) 268-8000 September 16, 2008 Copyright Copyright © 2008 Lattice Semiconductor Corporation. This document may not, in whole or part, be copied, photocopied, reproduced, translated, or reduced to any electronic medium or machine- readable form without prior written consent from Lattice Semiconductor Corporation. Trademarks Lattice Semiconductor Corporation, L Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (logo), L (stylized), L (design), Lattice (design), LSC, E2CMOS, Extreme Performance, FlashBAK, flexiFlash, flexiMAC, flexiPCS, FreedomChip, GAL, GDX, Generic Array Logic, HDL Explorer, IPexpress, ISP, ispATE, ispClock, ispDOWNLOAD, ispGAL, ispGDS, ispGDX, ispGDXV, ispGDX2, ispGENERATOR, ispJTAG, ispLEVER, ispLeverCORE, ispLSI, ispMACH, ispPAC, ispTRACY, ispTURBO, ispVIRTUAL MACHINE, ispVM, ispXP, ispXPGA, ispXPLD, LatticeEC, LatticeECP, LatticeECP-DSP, LatticeECP2, LatticeECP2M, LatticeMico8, LatticeMico32, LatticeSC, LatticeSCM, LatticeXP, LatticeXP2, MACH, MachXO, MACO, ORCA, PAC, PAC-Designer, PAL, Performance Analyst, PURESPEED, Reveal, Silicon Forest, Speedlocked, Speed Locking, SuperBIG, SuperCOOL, SuperFAST, SuperWIDE, sysCLOCK, sysCONFIG, sysDSP, sysHSI, sysI/O, sysMEM, The Simple Machine for Complex Design, TransFR, UltraMOS, and specific product designations are either registered trademarks or trademarks of Lattice Semiconductor Corporation or its subsidiaries in the United States and/or other countries. ISP, Bringing the Best Together, and More -
Reflections on Applying the Growth Mindset Approach to Computer Programming Courses
2018 Proceedings of the EDSIG Conference ISSN: 2473-3857 Norfolk, Virginia USA v4 n4641 Reflections on Applying the Growth Mindset Approach to Computer Programming Courses Katherine Carl Payne [email protected] Jeffry Babb [email protected] Amjad Abdullat [email protected] Department of Computer Information and Decision Management West Texas A&M University Canyon, Texas 79016, USA Abstract This paper provides motivation for the exploration of the adoption of Growth Mindset techniques in computer programming courses. This motivation is provided via an ethnographic account of the implementation of Growth Mindset concepts in the design and delivery of two consecutive computer programming courses. We present components of a Growth Mindset approach to STEM education and illustrate how they can be implemented in computing courses. Experiences of an instructor in two consecutive computer programming courses at a private regional undergraduate university in the southwestern United States are described and analyzed. Six students enrolled in the required Java course in the fall semester opted to take the elective Python course in the spring semester. Keywords: Growth mindset, reflective teaching practice, computer programming, STEM education, pedagogy 1. INTRODUCTION The work of Carol Dweck on what is termed the “Growth Mindset” has received significant As educators in STEM courses, we frequently hear attention in primary and secondary math students utter the phrase “I’m not a technical education and has recently experienced a person” or “I’m not good with computers.” I renaissance through application to math higher receive messages from concerned students education (Silva & White, 2013). Her work and expressing this sentiment every semester. -
Chapter 4 Editors and Debugging Systems
Chapter 4 Editors and Debugging Systems This Chapter gives you… Text editors Interactive Debugging Systems 4.0 Introduction An Interactive text editor has become an important part of almost any computing environment. Text editor acts as a primary interface to the computer for all type of “knowledge workers” as they compose, organize, study, and manipulate computer-based information. An interactive debugging system provides programmers with facilities that aid in testing and debugging of programs. Many such systems are available during these days. Our discussion is broad in scope, giving the overview of interactive debugging systems – not specific to any particular existing system. 4.1 Text Editors An Interactive text editor has become an important part of almost any computing environment. Text editor acts as a primary interface to the computer for all type of “knowledge workers” as they compose, organize, study, and manipulate computer-based information. A text editor allows you to edit a text file (create, modify etc…). For example the Interactive text editors on Windows OS - Notepad, WordPad, Microsoft Word, and text editors on UNIX OS - vi, emacs, jed, pico. Normally, the common editing features associated with text editors are, Moving the cursor, Deleting, Replacing, Pasting, Searching, Searching and replacing, Saving and loading, and, Miscellaneous(e.g. quitting). 4.1.1 Overview of the editing process An interactive editor is a computer program that allows a user to create and revise a target document. Document includes objects such as computer diagrams, text, equations tables, diagrams, line art, and photographs. Here we restrict to text editors, where character strings are the primary elements of the target text. -
Co-Ordination of the Nuclear Reaction Data Centers
XA9743324 Internotional Atomic Energy Agency INDC(NDS)-360 Distr. G,NC I N DC INTERNATIONAL NUCLEAR DATA COMMITTEE Co-ordination of the Nuclear Reaction Data Centers Report on an IAEA Advisory Group Meeting hosted by the U.S. National Nuclear Data Center on behalf of the U.S. Government Brookhaven, 3-7 June 1996 Edited by O. Schwerer and H.D. Lemmel November 1996 IAEA NUCLEAR DATA SECTION, WAGRAMERSTRASSE 5, A-1400 VIENNA Printed by the IAEA in Austria November 1996 INDC(NDS)-360 Distr. G,NC Co-ordination of the Nuclear Reaction Data Centers Report on an IAEA Advisory Group Meeting hosted by the U.S. National Nuclear Data Center on behalf of the U.S. Government Brookhaven, 3-7 June 1996 Abstract: This report summarizes the 1996 co-ordination meeting in Brookhaven, U.S.A., of the national and regional nuclear reaction data centers, convened by the IAEA at regular intervals. The main topics are - the international exchange of nuclear reaction data by means of the "EXFOR" system, and the further development of this system, the "CINDA" system as an international index and bibliography to neutron reaction data, the sharing of the workload for speedy and reliable nuclear data compilation and data center services, the exchange and documentation of evaluated data libraries in "ENDF" format, the rapid advances of online electronic information technologies, with the goal of rendering data center services to data users in IAEA Member States by means of computer retrievals, online services and printed materials. The scope of data covers microscopic cross-sections and related parameters of nuclear reactions induced by neutrons, charged-particles and photons.