Photoemission Footprints of Extrinsic Plasmarons
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Photoemission footprints of extrinsic plasmarons B. Hellsing1;2∗ and V.M. Silkin2;3;4 1Department of Physics, Gothenburg University, S-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden 2Donostia International Physics Center (DIPC), 20018 San Sebasti´an,Spain 3Depto. de F´ısica de Materiales, Facultad de Ciencias Qu´ımicas, Universidad del Pa´ısVasco, Apdo. 1072, 20080 San Sebasti´an,Spain 4IKERBASQUE, Basque Foundation for Science, 48011 Bilbao, Spain A prediction how to experimentally distinguish excitations of extrinsic plasmarons from intrinsic plasmarons is presented. In surface systems where excitations of acoustic surface plasmons is possible it is shown that the photo-electron yield in normal photoemission should decay according to an inverse square root dependence with respect to the photon energy. A computational analysis of the system p(2×2)-K/Graphite confirms this prediction. PACS numbers: 73.21.Fg,73.20.Mf, 79.60.Dp INTRODUCTION THEORY The intention is to form a theory in order to calculate In photoemission experiments, photo-electrons carry the yield of extrinsic plasmaron excitations. The energy information of many-body interactions created by the loss induced by the escaping photo-electron in an ARPES photo-hole and by the escaping photo-electron itself. In experiment is given by the rate of electronic surface exci- the case of strong coupling between the photo-hole or in- tations. In first order time dependent perturbation the- duced density caused by the photo-electron, and plasmon ory, "golden-rule", we have that the rate of extrinsic excitations, the quasi particle picture breaks down and plasmaron excitation is given by [23] new loss peaks appear in the photoemission spectrum. The excitation formed by the photo-hole { plasmon in- teraction defines the intrinsic plasmaron and the photo- Z W (!) = −2 Im drφ∗ (r;!)δn(r;!) ; (1) electron { plasmon interaction defines the extrinsic plas- ext maron [1, 2]. where φext is the external potential created by the escap- For systems with a surface-state band crossing the ing photo-electron and δn is the induced electron density. Fermi level, a plasmon localized at the surface and char- We consider an ARPES experiment and the possibility acterized by a sound-like dispersion, so-called Acoustic that an ejected photo-electron will lose part of its energy Surface Plasmon (ASP), has been predicted to exist [3, 4]. on its way to the detector. We assume that the electron Later on Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy experiments density "spill-out" from the surface is neglectible along have confirmed the presence of the ASP mode at the the path of the photo-electron. The external potential Be(0001) [5, 6] and noble metal surfaces [7{14] in good must then fulfill Laplace equation [24] agreement with calculations and graphene adsorbed on 1 2π metal substrates [15{22]. In cases when surface localized X qk(z−z~) i(qk·rk−!t) φext(rk; z; !) = − e e ; (2) quantum well states are formed, e.g. when atomic layers A qk qk arXiv:1506.07714v1 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci] 25 Jun 2015 of alkali metals are adsorbed on a metal surface the pos- sibility opens up to design ASP by varying the depth of where A is the surface area, qk = jqkj andz ~ is the distance the quantum well (type of alkali atoms) and the width of between the surface and the photo-electron. The rate of the quantum well (number of layers). energy loss can then be expressed in terms of the surface response function g(qk;!) [25] A challenge is to find out about the relative occurrence of the intrinsic and extrinsic plasmarons from a photoe- Z qkz mission experiment. In this paper we show that for a sur- g(qk;!) = dz e δn(z; qk;!) (3) face system with ASP, the extrinsic plasmaron excitation channel can be traced by looking at the photon energy and, accordingly, dependence of the photo-electron yield. Simple kinemat- −q z~ ics indicate an inverse square root dependence, while the 4π X e k W (!; z~) = Im[g(qk;!)]: (4) intrinsic plasmaron is not expected to depend on the pho- A qk qk ton energy. We will present results from an extension of a previous calculation on the system - a monolayer potas- We consider at this point a general system with an ultra sium adsorbed on graphite (p(2×2)-K/Graphite) [23]. thin metal adlayer adsorbed on metal surface. We assume 2 formation of a surface quantum well (QW) hosting a QW- state band and as a result the existence of ASP. A photo-excited electron with an initial parallel wave 0 vector kk will with some probability be inelastically scat- tered to kk while exciting an ASP with momentum 0 qk = kk − kk. The photo-electrons with momentum 0 kk=kk will yield the main peak, corresponding to the electrons having absorbed fully the photon energy. The width of this elastic peak reflects the finite lifetime of the photo-hole left behind. In addition a satellite structure might appear at higher binding energies due to scattering 0 0 from all kk and kk, satisfying kk = kk + qk, having ex- cited an ASP with momentum qk. If this satellite struc- ture gives rise to a distinct peak a extrinsic plasmaron excitation is realized. FIG. 1: (Color online) Calculated p(2×2)-K/Graphite band We calculate the kk-resolved photo-electron energy loss per time unit due to the ASP excitations, which is equiv- structure [26]. Red and blue color lines indicate the quantum well band and the lowest and the highest branches of the alent to the dispersion of the extrinsic plasmaron excita- folded π∗ and π bands, respectively. K¯0 and M¯0, represent the tions. This can be carried out from the expression given K¯ and M¯ points of the folded band structure due to the (2×2) in Eq. (4) overlayer of potassium. 0 2 Z kF Z 2π k 0 k −qkz~ W (kk; , z~) = dkk dα e Θ(qmax − qk) π 0 0 qk intensity of the extrinsic plasmaron excitationsp will de- 0 crease with photon energy accordingly, I ∼ 1= hν. This × Im[g(qk; − b + ¯h!(k ))] ; (5) k result can be traced back to the exponential decay with where kF is the band Fermi wave vector, kk = jkkj, respect toz ¯ (the time dependent location of the escaping 0 0 0 photo-electron) of the external potential penetrating the kk = jkkj, α the angle between the vectors kk and kk. solid (Eq. (2)). In the next section we illustrate this for Θ(x) is the Heaviside step function, b the binding en- 2 02 0 1=2 a specific system. ergy, qk = (kk + kk − 2kkkkcosα) , qmax the maximum wave vector up to which the ASP dispersion is well de- fined and ¯h!(kk)-b is the band dispersion relative the Fermi energy. CALCULATIONS The ARPES intensity is given by integrating in time the excitation rate W With this theoretical background we proceed to a spe- cific system, a monolayer of potassium on graphite, p(2× Z 1 2)-K/Graphite. According to the first principles calcula- I(kk; ; hν) = W (kk; , z~(t))dt ; (6) 0 tions by Chis et al. [26] a quasi-2D quantum well (QW) system is formed with an energy band centered at the but as dz~ = k?dt, where k? is the perpendicular mome- ¯ tum of the escaping photo-electron, we can now inte- Γ-point of the Brillouin zone (BZ) (see red colored line grate with respect toz ~, obtaining the photon energy de- in Fig. 1). Another quasi-2D system is formed in the pendence of the extrinsic plasmaron dispersion. Simple carbon atomic layer below the QW system, marked by kinematics in terms of photon energy hν, workfunction blue color. Due to the larger Fermi surface of the QW φ and QW binding energy yields band this band will contribute the most to the excita- b tions. Thus our analysis is focused on the QW band. It 2 0 2 should be noted however, that in the calculation of the k? = 2(hν − φ − b − + ¯h!(kk)) − kk : (7) surface response function g(qk;!) we include all excita- We then have the photon energy dependent intensity of tions. extrisic plasmaron 0 Z kF Z 2π k 2 0 k Acoustic surface plasmons I(kk; ; hν) = dkk dα 2 Θ(qmax − qk) π 0 0 k?qk 0 We have previously calculated the surface loss func- × Im[g(qk; − b + ¯h!(kk))] : (8) tion, Im [g(qk;!)] within the Time Dependent Density The expression in Eq. (8) forms the footprint of extrinsic Functional Theory scheme [23]. The surface loss func- plasmaron excitations. In the case of normal photoemis- tion versus ! and q reveals a linear sound-like dispersion sion (kk=0) when the photon energy hν exceeds φ−b the !(q) indicating the existence of ASP as a well-defined 3 FIG. 3: (Color online) Photoelectron intensity as a function of kk and E = - b - , where is the plasmaron excitation energy. The photon energy is 10 eV. FIG. 2: ASP dispersion of the system p(2× 2)-K/Graphite. The arrows indicate the directions Γ-¯ M¯ and Γ-¯ K¯ . The solid lines are extracted from the calculated Im [g(qk;!)] in [23]. The dashed lines indicate the strong damping of the ASP due to incoherent excitations of electron-hole pairs. collective excitation in the energy range 0-0.6 eV with a momentum transfer span up to about 0.1 a.u. The ex- tracted dispersion is shown Fig. 2. At larger momentum transfers, where the ASP dispersion is depicted by the dashed lines, this mode becomes strongly damped.