DOCSLIB.ORG

MALWARE ACTIVITY DETECTION THROUGH BROWSER EXTENSION Jayanth Betha1, Prakash Andavolu2, Mariyala V V Gupta3 Department of Computer Science and Engineering, St

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MALWARE ACTIVITY DETECTION THROUGH BROWSER EXTENSION Jayanth Betha1, Prakash Andavolu2, Mariyala V V Gupta3 Department of Computer Science and Engineering, St MALWARE ACTIVITY DETECTION THROUGH BROWSER EXTENSION Jayanth Betha1, Prakash Andavolu2, Mariyala V V Gupta3 Department of Computer Science and Engineering, St. Martin’s Engineering College, India. Abstract stretch out beyond the contaminated PC. A The drastic growth in Internet users and Malware infection may aim to damage the files Digital assets worldwide has created on storage devices; however, a keylogger is opportunities for cybercriminals to break utilized to take individual data, such as email into systems. The massive increase in ID's or passwords. While there are numerous malware and cybercrime is seen all over the approaches used to secure against keyloggers, globe; people have become more dependent this study mainly focuses on the detection of on the web environment. Malware (Malicious keyloggers. This research report will provide an Software), is a software that opens the door in-depth study on types of secretly monitoring for cybercriminals to access sensitive malware (keyloggers). A browser based solution information from the computing devices. In (browser extension) is needed to detect and alert the current technology-dependent world, the user about the keyloggers. attacks upon sensitive user information have In today’s technology-dependent world, continued to grow over time steadily. A attacks upon sensitive user information have common threat to data security is Malware. continued to evolve steadily over time. A Symantec discovered more than 430 million common threat to data security is Malware. new unique pieces of malware in 2015, up 36 According to (Symantec’s 2016 Internet percent from the year before. The objective of Security Threat Report. (n.d.). Retrieved the proposed research is to provide a better October 24, 2016) "In 2015 more than 430 way to detect and prevent user information million new distinct segments of malware, from malware that secretly monitors user increased by 36 percent from the year before". activities on the web. Keylogger Malware is This research mainly focuses on keyloggers. A the primary focus of this research. In most of keylogger is a software that can record every the cases, malware will directly affect web keystroke made on the keyboard. A keylogger browsers, so a browser-based solution was can record instant messages, web form data like proposed to detect and prevent user login id's and passwords, e-mail and any information from malware. information typed using the keyboard. Some Index Terms: Keyloggers, Browser keylogger programs are intended to record Extension, Malware attacks, Malware website URLs visited by the user. Although not detection. always, keyloggers are used for malicious purposes, often used as the surveillance tool, by I. INTRODUCTION employers to ensure that employees use work Due to increase in number of Internet connected computers for business purposes only. devices, malware infections and data breaches Unfortunately, attackers combine keylogger have become so common. Keyloggers are a with a spyware program allowing the attacker to standout amongst the most understood and collect user information over the internet. We dreaded security dangers on PCs today. They are can add some extensions in our browser to steal dreaded because they are hard to recognize and passwords quickly. These are local keyloggers because the harm they do is regularly intended to which capture every keyboard stroke. There is a ISSN (PRINT): 2393-8374, (ONLINE): 2394-0697, VOLUME-4, ISSUE-7, 2017 48 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CURRENT ENGINEERING AND SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH (IJCESR) need to find ways to shield ourselves from Hardware-based keyloggers can be identified, keyloggers and their intent to destroy user but the software-based keyloggers can pose a computing experience. Based on how they significant threat if not detected quickly (Arora, perform the recording of keyboard key presses et al, 2016). there are different types of keyloggers. We will Keylogger is a tool used to screen the carry out a study on various kinds of keyloggers. keystrokes on the console. Its existence cannot Baig & Mahmood. (2007), did research on some be distinguished as it runs in the background. It existing techniques of fortification against can be utilized to acquire data such as usernames, key-loggers. The proposed research is to build a passwords and the credit card details (Wazid, et browser extension that regularly monitors al, 2013). keyloggers and alerts user about its presence. According to William Lopez, in Assumptions of the Study: "Keyloggers" (EEL-4789 GROUP 2 - The solution developed in this research is a web.eng.fiu.edu), at the point when the theoretical one, which can be fulfilled by keylogger has been installed, it can concentrate specific programming, which is out of the scope on its execution. Keylogger actualizes every of this report. method in an unexpected way, and most utilize a Research Objectives: simple performance strategy known as hooking. 1. The objective of the research is to provide Hooking is a mechanism used to alter the a solution for alerting the user about the behavior of an operating system by intercepting presence of keylogger in the computer messages passed between different applications. system. The implementation of a keylogger 2. The new method enhances the existing software is an easy task. But to develop a anti-keylogging methods. keylogger that performs malicious tasks one Definitions of Terms and Concepts: must put effort on its stealth execution Keylogger:Is malicious spyware program that is functionality. In any computer system, whenever used to capture sensitive user information, like a keyboard key is pressed a specific hardware login id's and passwords or financial interrupt is generated which interrupts the information, which is then sent to third parties system level message queue. The system tracks for criminal exploitation. A Keylogger can be the focused application at the time when the either software program or hardware device. keyboard interrupt was generated and passes the Malware: Specially crafted program which is key value to the application level message queue specifically designed to disrupt or damage a of that focused application. It is the computer system. responsibility of the application to handle this key according to the application requirement. II. LITERATURE REVIEW Most of the modern applications hook the system Digital Crime has turned into a level message queue during their normal course noteworthy danger to the honesty of information of execution. So, making a slight modification to possessed. Along with viruses and worms, one the normal course of execution, Muzammi and of the greatest threats to PC users on the Internet Mahmood (2007) stated that an application level today is malware. It can seize programs, redirect hook is maintained to capture the keystrokes by usersto malicious web pages, show bypassing the system level message queue which advertisements based on personal information, in turn blocks the keylogger program from track web history, and simplyruin things. Several recording the keystrokes. The researchers also of them will reinstall themselves even after mentioned issues caused by system-level hooks. eliminating them, or shroud themselves deeply They reviewed Signature Based Scanning and inside Windows, making them extremely hard to Non-Signature Based Scanning mechanisms of clean (Baratz, 2004) in his web article about anti-keylogging. malware. The proposed research in this project One of the ways to collect a delicate focuses on providing a solution by creating a piece of information from a system is by using a browser extension for detecting the presence of keylogger which tracks down the keyboard keylogger when using web forms. The results strokes, either using a Software-based keylogger will, however, be presented based on the or using a hardware-based keylogger. theoretical evidence. ISSN (PRINT): 2393-8374, (ONLINE): 2394-0697, VOLUME-4, ISSUE-7, 2017 49 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CURRENT ENGINEERING AND SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH (IJCESR) III. DESIGN in time. A preprogrammed date and time triggers It is imperative to protect personal computers and activates a logic bomb. Once activated, a and data from malicious software (malware). logic bomb executes a malicious code that Malware is software designed to infiltrate and disrupts a computer's normal operation. For steal a confidential piece of information from example, to exploit a server database an attacker computers without the user's consent. Malware can program a logic bomb that launches after a gets installed on a computer in the form of a specific number of database entries. A logic virus, worm, trojan horse, spyware, logic bomb, bomb is implemented by the attacker when he rootkit, or keylogger. One of the ways to collect fails to perform malicious operations like full a tender piece of information from a system is by database deletion. The words slag code and logic using a keylogger malware. bomb are interchangeable. Virus: A malicious program which can inject its Rootkit: A rootkit is a malicious software code into other programs or applications or data program designed to operate computer system files. After successful code injection,the targeted by hiding deep inside system kernel remotely. areas or program become infected. By definition Once a rootkit is installed it is possible for the virus installation is done without user’s consent attacker to execute files on the compromised and spreads in the form of executable code system remotely. The rootkit malware infected transferred from one computing machine to system can act as a botnet for DDOS attack. another. A virus program often performs data DDOS attack is an attempt to make a machine or deletion or corruption on the infected computing network resource unavailable to those trying to device which leading to system access it. Detection and removal of rootkit inoperability(SebastianZ, 2013). malware are challenging because of its stealthy Worm: Is a malicious program capable of nature. To detect and prevent the system from exploiting operating system vulnerabilities to this kind of malware it is compulsory to monitor spread.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Identifying Threats Associated with Man-In-The-Middle Attacks During Communication Between a Mobile Device and the Back End Server in Mobile Banking Applications
    IOSR Journal of Computer Engineering (IOSR-JCE) e-ISSN: 2278-0661, p- ISSN: 2278-8727Volume 16, Issue 2, Ver. IX (Mar-Apr. 2014), PP 35-42 www.iosrjournals.org Identifying Threats Associated With Man-In-The-Middle Attacks during Communication between a Mobile Device and the Back End Server in Mobile Banking Applications Anthony Luvanda1,*Dr Stephen Kimani1 Dr Micheal Kimwele1 1. School of Computing and Information Technology, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, PO Box 62000-00200 Nairobi Kenya Abstract: Mobile banking, sometimes referred to as M-Banking, Mbanking or SMS Banking, is a term used for performing balance checks, account transactions, payments, credit applications and other banking transactions through a mobile device such as a mobile phone or Personal Digital Assistant (PDA). Mobile banking has until recently most often been performed via SMS or the Mobile Web. Apple's initial success with iPhone and the rapid growth of phones based on Google's Android (operating system) have led to increasing use of special client programs, called apps, downloaded to the mobile device hence increasing the number of banking applications that can be made available on mobile phones . This in turn has increased the popularity of mobile device use in regards to personal banking activities. Due to the characteristics of wireless medium, limited protection of the nodes, nature of connectivity and lack of centralized managing point, wireless networks tend to be highly vulnerable and more often than not they become subjects of attack. This paper proposes to identify potential threats associated with communication between a mobile device and the back end server in mobile banking applications.
    [Show full text]
  • Not So Secure! Research Report on End-Point Compromises and the Risk to Internet Banking
    Not so secure! Research report on end-point compromises and the risk to Internet banking Special research report. August 2016 Internet Banking has grown by leaps and bounds in India. India had over 400 million Internet users by the beginning of 2016 as per a report by IAMAI and IMRB. This is the highest number of Internet banking users in any country. While having a high number of Internet banking users indicates healthy adoption of IT and reduced costs for banks, it also means that this population is vulnerable to cyberthreats which can put their hard-earned money at risk. One of the biggest addressable risks which users face is man-in-the-browser and end-point compromise attacks. “Virtual keyboards are ineffective in preventing the theft of end-user credentials and banks need to look at end point security more holistically. End-point compromise is an attack in which the end user’s computer and, in many cases these days, a browser is compromised using a simple program—generally a browser plugin or browser extension. The program is designed to steal the Internet banking credentials of the end users. Our security research team looked at the Internet banking websites of 26 banks in India. We found that over 21 banks have inadequate mechanisms to detect or prevent attacks which could compromise the end user credentials. This finding has significant implications as the end user is generally gullible, and many users can be made to download a browser extension/plugin which is capable of capturing banking credentials. Mechanisms which are currently prevalent, such as the virtual keyboard, which were long considered a protection against such attacks, were found to be inadequate to prevent these attacks.
    [Show full text]
  • Microsoft Security Intelligence Report
    Microsoft Security Intelligence Report Volume 12 July through December, 2011 www.microsoft.com/sir Microsoft Security Intelligence Report This document is for informational purposes only. MICROSOFT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS, IMPLIED, OR STATUTORY, AS TO THE INFORMATION IN THIS DOCUMENT. This document is provided “as-is.” Information and views expressed in this document, including URL and other Internet website references, may change without notice. You bear the risk of using it. Copyright © 2012 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners. JULY–DECEMBER 2011 i Authors Dennis Batchelder David Felstead Ken Malcolmson Tim Rains Microsoft Protection Bing Microsoft Trustworthy Microsoft Trustworthy Technologies Computing Computing Paul Henry Shah Bawany Wadeware LLC Nam Ng Frank Simorjay Microsoft Windows Safety Microsoft Trustworthy Microsoft Trustworthy Platform Nitin Kumar Goel Computing Computing Microsoft Security Joe Blackbird Response Center Mark Oram Holly Stewart Microsoft Malware Microsoft Trustworthy Microsoft Malware Protection Center Jeff Jones Computing Protection Center Microsoft Trustworthy Eve Blakemore Computing Daryl Pecelj Matt Thomlinson Microsoft Trustworthy Microsoft IT Information Microsoft Trustworthy Computing Jimmy Kuo Security and Risk Computing Microsoft Malware Management Joe Faulhaber Protection Center Scott Wu Microsoft Malware Dave Probert Microsoft Malware Protection Center Marc Lauricella Microsoft
    [Show full text]
  • Mobile Banking Adeptness on Man-In-The-Middle and Man-In-The-Browser Attacks
    IOSR Journal of Mobile Computing & Application (IOSR-JMCA) e-ISSN: 2394-0050, P-ISSN: 2394-0042.Volume 4, Issue 2 (Mar. - Apr. 2017), PP 13-19 www.iosrjournals.org Mobile Banking Adeptness on Man-In-The-Middle and Man-In-The-Browser Attacks P.S.Jagadeesh Kumar, Wenli Hu, Xianpei Li, Kundan Lal Abstract : A brand new category of perilous threat, asphyxiate the browser behavior in line of attack similar to that of Trojan horses. These immaculate varieties of Trojan horses can acclimatize the banking transaction activities, as they are muddled in browsers on top of mobile banking applications, and exhibit the user's transactions. Primarily, they are man-in-the-middle (MITM) attacks pedestal on users illuminating their testament on a deceptive website and man-in-the-browser (MITB) attacks that modify the exterior of indenture in the user’s browser. Repugnant to phishing attacks which depends upon similar but illusive websites, these malicious attacks cannot be professed by the user, as they are with genuine titivates, the user is desperately logged-in as standard, and consequently, falls prey in losing practical mobile banking utilities. Keywords: Man-In-The-Middle (MITM), Man-In-The-Browser (MITB), Mobile Banking, Phishing Attack I. Introduction Mobile conventional password based consumer substantiation has been a distinguished sanctuary predicament. Even a primordial and tenuously accomplished phishing attack can be effectual for an effortless password thievery. Attributable to accumulate of phishing and connected attacks, susceptible requests such as online banking gradually more desired for more safe and sound authentication substitutes. Their clarifications, typically drop into a collection called two-step verification.
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey on Keylogger: a Malicious Attack
    International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Engineering & Technology (IJARCET) Volume 4 Issue 4, April 2015 A Survey on Keylogger: A malicious Attack NameHemita Pathak, Apurva Pawar, Balaji Patil are depicting working of keylogger. Section V suggests Abstract—Now a days, internet has become part of basic various prevention and detection methods. We enlist different needs for modern society. People are using internet for online applications of keylogger in section VI. Finally, we conclude banking and confidensial information sharing through email our paper in section VII. and chats on social networking sites. Intruters are using malwares to damage systems. Keylogger is one of the harmful II. DIFFERENT PASSWORD ATTACKS malwares. Keylogger tries to obtain private information through monitoring keystroke and communicating this data to For authentication of any system password is first and intruter with malicious intentions. And thus, keylogger is said to foremost step so, passwords play an important role in daily be a main threat for business and personal activities. To prevent life in various computing applications like ATM machines, from huge economical/personal loss, system needs to protect internet services, windows login, authentication in mobiles valuable information from Intruters. But before planning for etc. Intruders/hackers can make system vulnerable, can get prevention it is necessary to be aware of few things like key access of it and can also get valuable information of ours. In logger working. This paper gives a brief description of keylogger, it’s working, prevention detection of key logger and this section we enlisted some of possible password attacks. various applications of key logger.
    [Show full text]
  • Zeus Spyeye Banking Trojan Analysis
    SOFTWARE ASSURANCE Technical White Paper Reversal and Analysis of Zeus and SpyEye Banking Trojans IOActive, Inc. 701 5th Avenue, Suite 6850 Seattle, WA 98104 Toll free: (866) 760-0222 Office: (206) 784-4313 Fax: (206) 784-4367 Copyright ©2012 by IOActive, Incorporated All Rights Reserved. Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 1 SpyEye Malware Analysis ............................................................................................................................. 1 Initialization ............................................................................................................................................ 1 API Calls ................................................................................................................................................ 4 API Hooking ........................................................................................................................................... 4 Process Injection .................................................................................................................................... 5 Keystroke Logging ................................................................................................................................. 6 Form Grabbing ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Credentials Theft ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Malware Book 2016
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305469492 Handbook of Malware 2016 - A Wikipedia Book Book · July 2016 DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.5039.5122 CITATIONS READS 0 13,014 2 authors, including: Reiner Creutzburg Brandenburg University of Applied Sciences 489 PUBLICATIONS 472 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: NDT CE – Assessment of structures || ZfPBau – ZfPStatik View project 14. Nachwuchswissenschaftlerkonferenz Ost- und Mitteldeutscher Fachhochschulen (NWK 14) View project All content following this page was uploaded by Reiner Creutzburg on 20 July 2016. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Handbook of Malware 2016 A Wikipedia Book By Wikipedians Edited by: Reiner Creutzburg Technische Hochschule Brandenburg Fachbereich Informatik und Medien PF 2132 D-14737 Brandenburg Germany Email: [email protected] Contents 1 Malware - Introduction 1 1.1 Malware .................................................. 1 1.1.1 Purposes ............................................. 1 1.1.2 Proliferation ........................................... 2 1.1.3 Infectious malware: viruses and worms ............................. 3 1.1.4 Concealment: Viruses, trojan horses, rootkits, backdoors and evasion .............. 3 1.1.5 Vulnerability to malware ..................................... 4 1.1.6 Anti-malware strategies ..................................... 5 1.1.7 Grayware ............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Framework for Securing Mobile Banking Applications from Man in the Middle Attacks
    Journal of Information Engineering and Applications www.iiste.org ISSN 2224-5782 (print) ISSN 2225-0506 (online) Vol.4, No.12, 2014 Proposed Framework for Securing Mobile Banking Applications from Man in the Middle Attacks Anthony Luvanda School of Computing and Information Technology,Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, PO Box 62000-00200 Nairobi Kenya * E-mail of the corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract Mobile phone banking and payments continues to not only be a popular way of transacting business but it also seems to evolve rapidly. Despite its popularity however there seem to be some very genuine concerns on the security issues revolving around it, particularly in regard to man in the middle attacks. This paper seeks to propose a secure framework for communication between a mobile device and the back end server for protecting mobile banking applications from man-in-the-middle attacks without introducing further threats to the communication channel. Keywords: Defense- in-depth, Security, man in the middle attack, secure framework, bank server 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Man in the Middle Attacks on Mobile Banking Applications A Man in the middle attack is one in which the attacker intercepts messages in a public key exchange and then retransmits them, substituting his own public key for the requested one, so that the two original parties still appear to be communicating with each other (Chellegati 2009) The attack gets its name from the ball game where two people try to throw a ball directly to each other while one person in between them attempts to catch it.
    [Show full text]
  • How Anywhere Computing Just Killed Your Phone-Based Two-Factor Authentication
    How Anywhere Computing Just Killed Your Phone-Based Two-Factor Authentication Radhesh Krishnan Konothy, Victor van der Veeny, and Herbert Bos yEqual contribution joint first authors VU University Amsterdam, The Netherlands r:k:konoth@vu:nl;{vvdveen;herbertb}@cs:vu:nl Abstract. Exponential growth in smartphone usage combined with re- cent advances in mobile technology is causing a shift in (mobile) app behavior: application vendors no longer restrict their apps to a single platform, but rather add synchronization options that allow users to conveniently switch from mobile to PC or vice versa in order to access their services. This process of integrating apps among multiple platforms essentially removes the gap between them. Current, state of the art, mo- bile phone-based two-factor authentication (2FA) mechanisms, however, heavily rely on the existence of such separation. They are used in a vari- ety of segments (such as consumer online banking services or enterprise secure remote access) to protect against malware. For example, with 2FA in place, attackers should no longer be able to use their PC-based malware to instantiate fraudulent banking transactions. In this paper, we analyze the security implications of diminishing gaps between platforms and show that the ongoing integration and desire for increased usability results in violation of key principles for mobile phone 2FA. As a result, we identify a new class of vulnerabilities dubbed 2FA synchronization vulnerabilities. To support our findings, we present practical attacks against Android and iOS that illustrate how a Man- in-the-Browser attack can be elevated to intercept One-Time Passwords sent to the mobile phone and thus bypass the chain of 2FA mechanisms as used by many financial services.
    [Show full text]
  • Malware Risks and Mitigation Report
    MALWARE RISKS AND MITIGATION REPORT June 2011 BITS A DIVISION OF THE FINANCIAL SERVICES ROUNDTABLE 1001 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE NW SUITE 500 SOUTH WASHINGTON, DC 20004 202-289-4322 WWW.BITS.ORG BITS Malware Risk and Mitigation Report Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary ..............................................................................................................3 2. Malware Evolution................................................................................................................3 2.1 Malware Categories...............................................................................................................................5 2.2 Malware Example .................................................................................................................................8 2.3 Polymorphic Malware ........................................................................................................................10 3. Malware Supply and Demand ............................................................................................ 10 3.1 The Malware Industry ........................................................................................................................11 3.2 Malware Supply Chain........................................................................................................................13 3.3 Beyond Crime......................................................................................................................................14 4. Malware in Financial
    [Show full text]
  • An Emerging Threat Fileless Malware: a Survey and Research Challenges Sudhakar1,2* and Sushil Kumar3
    Sudhakar and Kumar Cybersecurity (2020) 3:1 Cybersecurity https://doi.org/10.1186/s42400-019-0043-x SURVEY Open Access An emerging threat Fileless malware: a survey and research challenges Sudhakar1,2* and Sushil Kumar3 Abstract With the evolution of cybersecurity countermeasures, the threat landscape has also evolved, especially in malware from traditional file-based malware to sophisticated and multifarious fileless malware. Fileless malware does not use traditional executables to carry-out its activities. So, it does not use the file system, thereby evading signature-based detection system. The fileless malware attack is catastrophic for any enterprise because of its persistence, and power to evade any anti-virus solutions. The malware leverages the power of operating systems, trusted tools to accomplish its malicious intent. To analyze such malware, security professionals use forensic tools to trace the attacker, whereas the attacker might use anti-forensics tools to erase their traces. This survey makes a comprehensive analysis of fileless malware and their detection techniques that are available in the literature. We present a process model to handle fileless malware attacks in the incident response process. In the end, the specific research gaps present in the proposed process model are identified, and associated challenges are highlighted. Keywords: Fileless malware, Botnet, Incident response, Memory forensics, Incident investigation, Memory resident malware, Rootkit Introduction Tian et al., 2019a). The attacker has been using malware Throughout the history of the malicious programs, there for its capabilities to control the compromised systems lo- is one thing which had remained unchanged, the devel- cally or remotely. Although, the operating systems itself opment of the malware program.
    [Show full text]
  • July 10, 2020 UNITED STATES PATENT and TRADEMARK
    [email protected] Paper 15 571-272-7822 Entered: July 10, 2020 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. TRUSTED KNIGHT CORPORATION, Patent Owner. IPR2020-00323 Patent 9,503,473 B1 Before THOMAS L. GIANNETTI, BRIAN J. MCNAMARA, and NABEEL U. KHAN, Administrative Patent Judges. KHAN, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review 35 U.S.C. § 314, 37 C.F.R. § 42.4 IPR2020-00323 Patent 9,503,473 B1 I. INTRODUCTION A. Background and Summary International Business Machines Corporation (“Petitioner”) filed a Petition (Paper 2, “Pet.”) requesting an inter partes review of claims 1–29 (“the challenged claims”) of U.S. Patent No. 9,503,473 B1 (Ex. 1001, “the ’473 Patent”). Trusted Knight Corporation (“Patent Owner”) timely filed a Preliminary Response (Paper 6, “Prelim. Resp.”). With our authorization, Petitioner filed a Preliminary Reply (Paper 8, “Reply”), and Patent Owner filed a Sur-Reply (Paper 10, “Sur-Reply”) and Petitioner filed a Reply to Patent Owner’s Sur-Reply (Paper 13, “Sur-Sur-Reply”). We have authority to institute an inter partes review only if the information presented in the Petition shows “there is a reasonable likelihood that the petitioner would prevail with respect to at least 1 of the claims challenged in the petition.” 35 U.S.C. § 314(a). Upon consideration of the Petition and the Preliminary Response, we conclude that Petitioner has shown a reasonable likelihood of prevailing against at least one of the challenged claims. For the reasons explained below, we institute an inter partes review on the challenged claims of the ’473 Patent.
    [Show full text]