Reticulitermes Flavipes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Reticulitermes Flavipes RETICULITERMES FLAVIPES (ISOPTERA: RHINOTERMITIDAE) PROTEOMICS By CHARLES JERRY BOWEN, JR. Bachelor of Science Midwestern State University Wichita Falls, Texas 1994 Master of Science Midwestern State University Wichita Falls, Texas 2002 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May 2007 C O P Y R I G H T By C. Jerry Bowen May 2007 RETICULITERMES FLAVIPES (ISOPTERA: RHINOTERMITIDAE) PROTEOMICS Dissertation Approved: Bradford M. Kard Dissertation Advisor Jack W. Dillwith Kristopher L. Giles Mark E. Payton A. Gordon Emslie Dean of the Graduate College iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my deepest gratitude to Dr. Jack W. Dillwith for all he has done to help me with this project. Without his guidance, this project would have been impossible to complete. Dr. Brad Kard was invaluable as my committee chair and major advisor. Also, I would like to extend my sincerest gratitude to Dr. Kris Giles and Dr. Mark Payton for their participation on my committee. I would like to thank Robin Madden and Dr. Bryna Donnelly for both their technical assistance ‘at the bench’ and their friendship. I would like to thank the people of the Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology for allowing me to be a part of the whole and their patience in waiting to apply a termiticide until my research was complete. My thanks to the department head, initially, Dr. Russell Wright during the early days, and later, Dr. Jonathan Edelson for their support. I would like to thank Oklahoma State University and The Nature Conservancy for allowing me to collect termites on their facilities. Thank you to Michael P. Doss and Greg H. Broussard for assistance collecting ‘wild’ termites from the field. Also, thank you to Doug Keuhl for assistance sorting termite instars in the laboratory. I would like to thank Don Arnold for his patience when the termites I was collecting damaged several of the slide boxes. I would like to thank Dr. Steve Hartson, Janet Rogers, and Lisa Whitworth of the Oklahoma State University Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Core Facility. I would also like to thank Dr. Patricia Ayoubi and Dr. Peter Hoyt for their assistance assimilating the molecular functions. I would also like to thank Hua Weng for maintaining and updating local protein databases. I would like to thank my grandmother, Clara Riordan, my parents, Don and Joan Riddles, and Charles and Elizabeth Bowen. I would also like to thank Pam Hathorn and my friends for their support over the past several years. Without you, I could never have made it this far. I would like to thank Matrix Science, Inc. (Mascot) and Syngene Ltd.(Dymension) for their consent to reproduce images generated by their software. To those whom I have failed to name, I thank you as well. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1 II. OBJECTIVES ......................................................................................................... 6 III. LITERATURE REVIEW ........................................................................................ 7 IV. MATERIALS AND METHODS .......................................................................... 18 Objective I – Develop a system for analyzing the termite proteome. .............. 19 Part 1: Optimize solubilization and staining ........................................ 19 Part 2: Optimize isoelectric focusing ................................................... 26 Part 3: Optimize SDS-PAGE ................................................................ 28 Objective II – Develop standard protein reference map for Reticulitermes flavipes ............................................................. 32 Objective III – Initial characterization of the putative R. flavipes proteome ... 34 Objective IV – Test for differential protein expression among R. flavipes colonies .................................................................. 40 Objective V – Test for differential protein expression between worker and solder castes .......................................................... 42 V. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ............................................................................ 43 Objective I – Develop a system for analyzing the termite proteome ............... 43 Objective II – Develop standard protein reference map for Reticulitermes flavipes ............................................................. 52 Objective III – Initial characterization of the putative R. flavipes proteome ... 78 Objective IV – Test for differential protein expression among R. flavipes colonies ................................................................ 117 Objective V – Test for differential protein expression between worker and soldier castes .................................................................. 131 VI. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS .................................................................. 179 VII. LITERATURE CITED ........................................................................................ 183 VIII. APPENDICES .................................................................................................... 203 Appendix A – Flowcharts ............................................................................. 204 Flowchart Illustrating Overall Project ................................................ 205 v Flowchart Illustrating Objective I – Develop a system for analyzing the termite proteome ........................................... 206 Flowchart Illustrating Objective II – Develop standard protein reference map for Reticulitermes flavipes ............................... 209 Flowchart Illustrating Objective III – Initial characterization of the putative R. flavipes proteome ......................................... 210 Flowchart Illustrating Objective IV – Comparing Multiple Termite Colonies....................................................................... 211 Flowchart Illustrating Objective V – Comparing Worker/Soldier Castes .............................................................. 212 Appendix B – Suggested Reagent List......................................................... 213 Appendix C – Links ..................................................................................... 215 vi LIST OF TABLES Page Table 1. Immobiline pH strip protein loads and DDT reswelling solution volume ......... 26 Table 2. Reagent volumes for acrylamide solutions per each 10.0mL of solution .......... 29 Table 3. Reference map data ............................................................................................ 61 Table 4. Putative identifications with a ‘termite’ source ................................................ 101 Table 5. Putative worker protein identifications ............................................................ 102 Table 6. Differentially expressed proteins between worker and soldier castes from the same colony ....................................................................................... 142 Table 7. Putative soldier protein identifications ............................................................ 168 vii LIST OF FIGURES Page Fig. 1. Examples of proteins processed with and without protease inhibitor: (A) Precipitant processed with protease inhibitor; (B) Precipitant processed without protease inhibitor. ................................................................. 44 Fig. 2. Examples of gels using 8.0M treatments: (A) 8.0M urea, Triton X-100, and carrier ampholyte; (B) 8.0M urea, Triton X-100, tris, and carrier ampholyte; (C) 8.0M urea, Triton X-100, CHAPS, and carrier ampholyte. ...... 45 Fig. 3. Examples of gels using 6.0M urea and 2.0M thiourea solutions: (A) 6.0M urea, 2.0M thiourea, Triton X-100, and carrier ampholyte; (B) 6.0M urea, 2.0M thiourea, Triton X-100, tris, and carrier ampholyte; (C). 6.0M urea, 2.0M thiourea, Triton X-100, CHAPS, and carrier ampholyte; and (D) 6.0M urea, 2.0M thiourea, Triton X-100, CHAPS, tris, and carrier ampholyte. ................................................................................. 46 Fig. 4. Examples of gels generated using various pH ranges: (A) 4-7 pH; (B) 3-10 pH; and (C) 3-10NL pH. ...................................................................... 47 Fig. 5. Differences in spot patterns relative to acrylamide monomer percentage: (A) 7cm with 12.0% monomer; (B) 7cm gel with 14.0% monomer; (C) 7cm gel with 16.0% monomer; (D) 7cm gel with 18.0% monomer; (E) 24cm gel with 16.0% monomer; (F) 24cm gel with 18.0% monomer. ........ 49 Fig. 6. Comparison of gel sizes: (A) 7cm gel; (B) 11cm gel; (C) 24cm gel. .................. 50 Fig. 7. Grid for estimating pI and molecular weights. ..................................................... 55 Fig. 8. Worker caste reference Map for Reticulitermes flavipes. Inset: Overview of gel quadrants. ....................................................................... 56 Fig. 9. Worker caste reference map for Reticulitermes flavipes – Quadrant 1. Inset: Highlight of selected gel quadrant. ........................................................... 57 Fig. 10. Worker caste reference map for Reticulitermes flavipes – Quadrant 2. Inset: Highlight of selected gel quadrant. ........................................................... 58 Fig. 11. Worker caste reference map for Reticulitermes flavipes – Quadrant 3. Inset: Highlight of selected gel quadrant. ..........................................................
Recommended publications
  • Molecular Clock Or Erratic Evolution?
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 11729-11734, October 1996 Evolution Molecular clock or erratic evolution? A tale of two genes (neutral theory of evolution/glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase/superoxide dismutase/Drosophila/Ceratitis) FRANcIsco J. AyALA*t, ELADIO BARRIO*t, AND JAN KWIATOWSKI* *Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697; and iDepartment of Genetics, University of Valencia, 46100-Burjassot, Valencia, Spain Contributed by Francisco J. Ayala, July 19, 1996 ABSTRACT We have investigated the evolution of glycer- Dorsilopha s.g. ol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (Gpdh). The rate of amino acid Hirtodrosophila s.g. replacements is 1 x 10'10/site/year when Drosophila species Drosophila s.g. are compared. The rate is 2.7 times greater when Drosophila and Chymomyza species are compared; and about 5 times Zaprionus s.g. greater when any of those species are compared with the Sophophora s.g. medfly Ceratitis capitata. This rate of 5 x 10'10/site/year is also the rate observed in comparisons between mammals, or Chymomyz a between different animal phyla, or between the three multi- cellular kingdoms. We have also studied the evolution of Scaptodrosophila Cu,Zn superoxide dismutase (Sod). The rate of amino acid replacements is about 17 x 10'10/site/year when compari- Ceratitis sons are made between dipterans or between mammals, but only 5 x 10-10 when animal phyla are compared, and only 3 x 100 0 10-10 when the multicellular kingdoms are compared. The apparent decrease by about a factor of 5 in the rate of SOD evolution as the divergence between species increases can be My consistent with the molecular clock hypothesis by assuming the FIG.
    [Show full text]
  • Cataglyphis, an Ant from the Sahara Desert WALTER J
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 92, pp. 2994-2998, March 1995 Ecology Heat shock protein synthesis and thermotolerance in Cataglyphis, an ant from the Sahara desert WALTER J. GEHRING*t AND RUDIGER WEHNERt *Biozentrum, University of Basel, Klingelbergstrasse 70, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland; and *Zoological Institute, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland Contributed by Walter J. Gehring, December 30, 1994 ABSTRACT The ant Cataglyphis lives in the Sahara desert cognates (HSCs), which are strongly expressed at normal and is one of the most thermotolerant land animals known. It temperatures (5, 6). In contrast to HSP70, the HSP83 protein forages at body temperatures above 50°C, and the critical is not only heat inducible, but it is also expressed at relatively thermal maxima are at 53.6 + O.8AC for Cataglyphis bombycina high levels during development at normal temperatures. The and 55.1 + 1.1°C for Cataglyphis bicolor. The synthesis and four small HSPs, HSP22, -23, -26, and -27, are encoded by four accumulation of heat shock proteins (HSPs) were analyzed in genes clustered at the same chromosomal locus. They are heat Cataglyphis and compared to Formica, an ant living in more inducible in all cells but are also expressed in various tissues moderate climates, and to two Drosophila species. In Catagly- during development at normal temperatures. In contrast to HSP70 and HSP83, which are highly conserved in evolution, phis, protein synthesis continues at temperatures up to 45°C the four small HSPs are more variable among various Dro- as compared to 39°C for Formica and Drosophila.
    [Show full text]
  • Cataglyphis, an Ant from the Sahara Desert WALTER J
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 92, pp. 2994-2998, March 1995 Ecology Heat shock protein synthesis and thermotolerance in Cataglyphis, an ant from the Sahara desert WALTER J. GEHRING*t AND RUDIGER WEHNERt *Biozentrum, University of Basel, Klingelbergstrasse 70, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland; and *Zoological Institute, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland Contributed by Walter J. Gehring, December 30, 1994 ABSTRACT The ant Cataglyphis lives in the Sahara desert cognates (HSCs), which are strongly expressed at normal and is one of the most thermotolerant land animals known. It temperatures (5, 6). In contrast to HSP70, the HSP83 protein forages at body temperatures above 50°C, and the critical is not only heat inducible, but it is also expressed at relatively thermal maxima are at 53.6 + O.8AC for Cataglyphis bombycina high levels during development at normal temperatures. The and 55.1 + 1.1°C for Cataglyphis bicolor. The synthesis and four small HSPs, HSP22, -23, -26, and -27, are encoded by four accumulation of heat shock proteins (HSPs) were analyzed in genes clustered at the same chromosomal locus. They are heat Cataglyphis and compared to Formica, an ant living in more inducible in all cells but are also expressed in various tissues moderate climates, and to two Drosophila species. In Catagly- during development at normal temperatures. In contrast to HSP70 and HSP83, which are highly conserved in evolution, phis, protein synthesis continues at temperatures up to 45°C the four small HSPs are more variable among various Dro- as compared to 39°C for Formica and Drosophila.
    [Show full text]
  • On Some Population Parameters of Drosophilids in Switzerland (Diptera, Drosophilidae)
    Bächli, G; Schatzmann, E; Haring, E (2008). On some population parameters of drosophilids in Switzerland (Diptera, Drosophilidae). Mitteilungen- Schweizerische Entomologische Gesellschaft , 81:243-260. Postprint available at: http://www.zora.uzh.ch University of Zurich Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich. Zurich Open Repository and Archive http://www.zora.uzh.ch Originally published at: Mitteilungen- Schweizerische Entomologische Gesellschaft 2008, 81:243-260. Winterthurerstr. 190 CH-8057 Zurich http://www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2008 On some population parameters of drosophilids in Switzerland (Diptera, Drosophilidae) Bächli, G; Schatzmann, E; Haring, E Bächli, G; Schatzmann, E; Haring, E (2008). On some population parameters of drosophilids in Switzerland (Diptera, Drosophilidae). Mitteilungen- Schweizerische Entomologische Gesellschaft , 81:243-260. Postprint available at: http://www.zora.uzh.ch Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich. http://www.zora.uzh.ch Originally published at: Mitteilungen- Schweizerische Entomologische Gesellschaft 2008, 81:243-260. MITTEILUNGEN DER SCHWEIZERISCHEN ENTOMOLOGISCHEN GESELLSCHAFT BULLETIN DE LA SOCIÉTÉ ENTOMOLOGIQUE SUISSE 81: 243–260, 2008 On some population parameters of drosophilids in Switzerland (Diptera, Drosophilidae) GERHARD BÄCHLI1, ERNST SCHATZMANN2 & ELISABETH HARING3 1 Zoological Museum, Winterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8047 Zürich; [email protected] 2 Hofwisenstrasse 3, CH-8317 Tagelswangen; [email protected] 3 Museum of Natural History, 1. Zoological Department, Molecular Systematics, Burgring 7, A-1010 Vienna; [email protected] Based on a collection of Drosophilidae in western Switzerland, the counts of flies were analyzed to get coordinated information about population parameters such as aggregation, succession, sex ratio, association and diurnal activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Diptera: Drosophilidae), with Comments on Combined Analysis and Character Support
    MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 24 (2002) 249–264 www.academicpress.com Phylogeny of Drosophilinae (Diptera: Drosophilidae), with comments on combined analysis and character support James Remsena,b,*,1 and Patrick O’Gradya a Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79thStreet, New York, NY 10024, USA b Department of Biology, New York University, 1009 Main Building, 100 Washington Square East, New York, NY 10003, USA Received 29 August 2001; received in revised form 10 April 2002 Abstract Drosophilidae (Diptera) is a diverse, cosmopolitan family of flies. Here, we present a combined analysis phylogeny of Droso- philinae, one of the two subfamilies of Drosophilidae, based on data from six different data partitions, including both molecular and morphological characters. Although our data show support for the monophyly of the Hawaiian Drosophilidae, and the subgenus Sophophora, neither the genus Drosophila nor the subgenus Drosophila is monophyletic. Partitioned Bremer support (PBS) indicates that morphological data taken from Grimaldi’s monograph (Grimaldi, 1990a), as well as sequences from the mitochondrial (mt) 16S rDNA and the nuclear Adh gene, lend much support to our tree’s topology. This is particularly interesting in the case of Grimaldi’s data, since his published hypothesis conflicts with ours in significant ways. Our combined analysis cladogram phylogeny reflects the catchall designation that the name Drosophila has become, in that the cladogram does not support the monophyly of either the genus or subgenus Drosophila. Ó 2002 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved. 1. Introduction Fenster, 1989), extensive foreleg and mouthpart modi- fication (Carson et al., 1970), and wing patterning.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinal Patterns of Chromosomal Inversion Polymorphism in Drosophila Subobscura Are Partly Associated with Thermal Preferences and Heat Stress Resistance
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/26802408 Clinal patterns of chromosomal inversion polymorphism in Drosophila subobscura are partly associated with thermal preferences and heat stress resistance Article in Evolution · October 2009 DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00835.x · Source: PubMed CITATIONS READS 51 78 6 authors, including: Carla Rego Joan Balanya University of the Azores University of Barcelona 208 PUBLICATIONS 622 CITATIONS 47 PUBLICATIONS 1,418 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Inês Fragata Margarida Matos University of Lisbon University of Lisbon 66 PUBLICATIONS 386 CITATIONS 98 PUBLICATIONS 1,023 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Fauna Entomológica dos Açores View project Arthropod diversity of Madeira Island View project All content following this page was uploaded by Mauro Santos on 11 October 2017. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. ORIGINAL ARTICLE doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00835.x CLINAL PATTERNS OF CHROMOSOMAL INVERSION POLYMORPHISMS IN DROSOPHILA SUBOBSCURA ARE PARTLY ASSOCIATED WITH THERMAL PREFERENCES AND HEAT STRESS RESISTANCE Carla Rego,1,2 Joan Balanya,` 3,4 Inesˆ Fragata,5,6 Margarida Matos,5,7 Enrico L. Rezende,1,8 and Mauro Santos1,9,10 1Departament de Genetica` i de Microbiologia, Grup de Biologia Evolutiva (GBE), Universitat Autonoma` de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra (Barcelona), Spain 2E-mail: [email protected] 3Departament
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Clock Or Erratic Evolution? a Tale of Two Genes
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 11729-11734, October 1996 Evolution Molecular clock or erratic evolution? A tale of two genes (neutral theory of evolution/glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase/superoxide dismutase/Drosophila/Ceratitis) FRANcIsco J. AyALA*t, ELADIO BARRIO*t, AND JAN KWIATOWSKI* *Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697; and iDepartment of Genetics, University of Valencia, 46100-Burjassot, Valencia, Spain Contributed by Francisco J. Ayala, July 19, 1996 ABSTRACT We have investigated the evolution of glycer- Dorsilopha s.g. ol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (Gpdh). The rate of amino acid Hirtodrosophila s.g. replacements is 1 x 10'10/site/year when Drosophila species Drosophila s.g. are compared. The rate is 2.7 times greater when Drosophila and Chymomyza species are compared; and about 5 times Zaprionus s.g. greater when any of those species are compared with the Sophophora s.g. medfly Ceratitis capitata. This rate of 5 x 10'10/site/year is also the rate observed in comparisons between mammals, or Chymomyz a between different animal phyla, or between the three multi- cellular kingdoms. We have also studied the evolution of Scaptodrosophila Cu,Zn superoxide dismutase (Sod). The rate of amino acid replacements is about 17 x 10'10/site/year when compari- Ceratitis sons are made between dipterans or between mammals, but only 5 x 10-10 when animal phyla are compared, and only 3 x 100 0 10-10 when the multicellular kingdoms are compared. The apparent decrease by about a factor of 5 in the rate of SOD evolution as the divergence between species increases can be My consistent with the molecular clock hypothesis by assuming the FIG.
    [Show full text]
  • Drosophila Information Service 72
    DROSOPHILA INFORMATION SERVICE 72 July 1993 Material contributed by DROSOPHILA WORKERS and arranged by James N. Thompson jr. Material presented here should not be used in publications without the consent of the author. prepared at Department of Zoology University of Oklahoma Norman, Oklahoma 73019 Drosophila Information Service Number 72 July 1993 Prepared at the Department of Zoology University of Oklahoma Norman, Oklahoma 73019 U.S.A. u DIS 71 (July 1992) Preface Two new additions to this issue will hopefully increase the access to useful information for Drosophila researchers. First, an author/title and key word index to back issues of DIS (volumes 50 - 71) has been prepared. Photocopies of individual out-of-print research and technique articles can be obtained from the editor for $1.00 each, including postage. A key word index to the most recent issue will be included in future volumes. Second, we will begin printing contributions at regional and national Drosophila meetings as space allows. This will help researchers identify others with similar interests and will increase the visibility of presentations at smaller meetings world-wide. Publicity of these conferences will, however, only be possible if you bring them to our attention. To help identify special materials to include in future issues, a DIS Advisory Group is being formed. Current members include Michael Ashburner (Cambridge University), Daniel Hartl (Harvard University), Kathleen Matthews (Indiana University), and R.C. Woodruff (Bowling Green State University). Others will be added during the coming months, and recommendations are invited. The production of DIS 72 could not have been completed without the generous efforts of many people.
    [Show full text]
  • Revista Chilena De Entomología
    Rev. Chilena Em. 1987, 15: 37-60 A REVIEW OF THE GENUS DROSOPHILA FALLEN (DÍPTERA: DROSOPHILIDAE) IN CHILE WITH THE DESCRIPTION OF DROSOPHILA ATACAMENSIS SP. NOV} Danko Brncic^ SUMMARY A revised list of species of the genus Drosophila (Díptera: Drosophilidae) found in Chile is given and a new identification key is proposed. The genus in Chile includes 27 species belonging to 6 subgenera: Chusqueophila (1 species), Dorsilopha (1 species), Drosophila (19 species), Hirtodrosophila (1 species), Phlondosa ( 1 species) and Sophophora (4 species). One of the species of the subgenus £)rosop/¡¿/a is new; D. (Drosophila) alacametists Brncic and Wheeler sp. nov. and is described here (with figures). The species found in Chile belong to four categories: (a) cosmopolitan (8 species), (b) subcosmopolitan (4 species), (c) widespread in the New World) (3 species) and (d) endemic ( 1 2 species). The central región of the country contains the largest number of endemic species, followed by the North and South regions. No endemic species have been found in the Austral región (Aisen and Magallanes). RESUMEN Se entrega una lista actualizada de las especies del género Drosophila (Díptera, Drosophilidae) encon- tradas en Chile y se propone una nueva clave para la identificación. El género en Chile incluye 27 especies pertenecientes a 6 subgéneros: Chusqueophila (1 especie), Dorsilopha (1 especie), Drosophila (19 especies), Hirtodrosophila ( I especie), Phlondosa ( 1 especie) y Sophophora (4 especies). Una de las especies del subgénero Drosophila es nueva: D. (Drosophila) alacamensis Brncic y Wheeler sp. nov. y se da su descripción (con figuras). Las especies encontradas en Chile pertenecen a cuatro categorías: a) cosmopolitas (8 especies), b) subcosmopolitas (4 especies), c) ampliamente extendidas en el nuevo mundo (3 especies), y d) endémicas ( 1 2 especies).
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Braulidae, Camillidae, Diastatidae And
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 441:Checklist 333–338 (2014)of the Braulidae, Camillidae, Diastatidae and Drosophilidae of Finland... 333 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.441.7057 CHECKLIST www.zookeys.org Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Checklist of the Braulidae, Camillidae, Diastatidae and Drosophilidae of Finland (Diptera, Ephydroidea) Jere Kahanpää1 1 Finnish Museum of Natural History, Zoology Unit, P.O. Box 17, FI–00014 University of Helsinki, Finland Corresponding author: Jere Kahanpää ([email protected]) Academic editor: J. Salmela | Received 5 February 2014 | Accepted 2 April 2014 | Published 19 September 2014 http://zoobank.org/5430D0C6-7C25-439D-9F97-5EF9DAF6BD10 Citation: Kahanpää J (2014) Checklist of the Braulidae, Camillidae, Diastatidae and Drosophilidae of Finland (Diptera, Ephydroidea). In: Kahanpää J, Salmela J (Eds) Checklist of the Diptera of Finland. ZooKeys 441: 333–338. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.441.7057 Abstract A checklist of the Braulidae (1 species), Camillidae (3 spp.), Diastatidae (10 spp.) and Drosophilidae (67 spp.) of Finland is presented. Campichoetinae is included as a subfamily of Diastatidae. Keywords Checklist, Finland, Diptera, biodiversity, faunistics Introduction The Ephydroidea is now recognized as a well-supported, probably monophyletic clade of acalyptrate flies (Wiegmann et al. 2011), although the correct placement of some of the included families – especially the very unsual bee louses of family Braulidae – is still being discussed. The relationships of the families within the superfamily are less understood and the families are listed alphabetically in the checklist below. Seven or eight families are currently included in Ephydroidea. Five of them are found in Finland. Four families are covered in this paper; the fifth (Ephydridae itself) has its own treatment in this volume of ZooKeys.
    [Show full text]
  • Effet De La Succession Temporelle Des Ressources Végétales
    Effet de la succession temporelle des ressources végétales à l’échelle des paysages sur les communautés de drosophiles : Cas d’étude en agrosystème viticole suite à l’invasion par Drosophila suzukii Lionel Delbac To cite this version: Lionel Delbac. Effet de la succession temporelle des ressources végétales à l’échelle des paysages sur les communautés de drosophiles : Cas d’étude en agrosystème viticole suite à l’invasion par Drosophila suzukii. Biodiversité et Ecologie. Université de Bordeaux, 2020. Français. NNT : 2020BORD0261. tel-03156134 HAL Id: tel-03156134 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-03156134 Submitted on 2 Mar 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. THÈSE PRÉSENTÉE POUR OBTENIR LE GRADE DE DOCTEUR DE L’UNIVERSITÉ DE BORDEAUX ÉCOLE DOCTORALE 304 Sciences et Environnements SPÉCIALITÉ Ecologie évolutive, fonctionnelle et des communautés Par Lionel DELBAC Effet de la succession temporelle des ressources végétales à l’échelle des paysages sur les communautés de drosophiles. Cas d’étude en agrosystème viticole suite à l'invasion par Drosophila suzukii Sous la direction de : Denis THIERY (Directeur de thèse) (Co-encadrant : Adrien RUSCH) Soutenue le 14/12/2020 Membres du jury : Mme GIBERT, Patricia, Directrice de Recherches, CNRS Lyon Présidente & Rapportrice M.
    [Show full text]
  • Ref-Key Drosophila (Markow, O'grady, 2006).Pdf
    P473052-Prelims.qxd 10/1/05 5:18 PM Page vii Preface When you say “Drosophila” to most people, they think of Drosophila melanogaster, the laboratory workhorse that for nearly 100 years has been the premier genetic model system in biology. Many remember the smell of ether while handling flies in their undergraduate biology classes, while others recall curly wings and white eyes and Punnet squares. T. H. Morgan and his students C. Bridges, H. J. Muller, and A. H. Sturtevant pioneered the field of Drosophila genetics during the first half of the twentieth century. Their work has been carried on by countless “drosophilists” and, in some ways, culminated with the publication of the full genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster in 2000. Now Drosophila biology is entering a new era. The genome of a second species, Drosophila pseudoobscura, has recently been completed and more are surely to come. Increasingly, when researchers state that they work on Drosophila they are met with the following question: “What species?” Scientists in the fields of ecology and evolu- tionary biology are beginning to co-opt various members of the genus Drosophila to serve as a model system for their own research, largely because of the ease of obtain- ing molecular markers from these species. As we were preparing this book for publi- cation, the National Human Genome Research Institute approved whole genome sequencing of 10 additional Drosophila species, and the creation of BAC libraries for 20. We feel that this initiative will invigorate Drosophila research for the next 100 years. The genus Drosophila represents an unprecedented model system not only for understanding genome evolution, but also for comparative experimental research.
    [Show full text]