DOCSLIB.ORG

Congaree National Park

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Congaree National Park Social Science Program National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Visitor Services Project Congaree National Park Visitor Study Spring 2005 Report 163 Visitor Services Project Park Studies Unit Social Science Program National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Visitor Services Project Congaree National Park Visitor Study Spring 2005 Yen Le Margaret Littlejohn Steven Hollenhorst Visitor Services Project Report 163 November 2005 Dr. Yen Le is the VSP Coordinator Assistant, Margaret Littlejohn is the National Park Service VSP Coordinator, and Dr. Steven Hollenhorst is the Director of the Park Studies Unit (PSU), Department of Conservation Social Sciences, University of Idaho. We thank the staff and volunteers of Congaree National Park for their assistance with this study. The VSP acknowledge David Vollmer for his technical assistance. This study was partially funded by Fee Demonstration Funding Congaree National Park – VSP Visitor Study April 15-24, 2005 Visitor Services Project Congaree National Park Report Summary • This report describes the results of a visitor study at Congaree National Park during April 15-24, 2005. A total of 453 questionnaires were distributed to visitor groups. Of those, 326 questionnaires were returned resulting in a 72% response rate. • This report profiles Congaree National Park visitors. Most results are presented in graphs and frequency tables. Summaries of visitor comments are included in the report and complete comments are included in an appendix. • Forty-one percent of visitor groups were in groups of two and 28% were in groups of three or four. Fifty-six percent of the visitor groups were family groups. Forty-seven percent of visitors were ages 41-65 years and 15% were ages 15 or younger. • United States visitors were from South Carolina (65%), North Carolina (7%), 33 other states, and Washington DC. International visitors, comprising 5% of the total visitation, were from Canada (33%), England (29%), and 12 other countries. • Fifty-seven percent of visitors visited Congaree National Park for the first time in their lifetime and 62% visited for the first time in the past five years. Thirty-two percent of visitors (16 years or older) have a graduate degree and 29% hold a bachelor’s degree. • Prior to this visit, visitor groups most often obtained information about Congaree National Park through previous visits (44%) and friends/relatives/word of mouth (31%). Five percent of visitor groups did not obtain any information before their visit. Most groups (88%) received the information they needed about the park. • Sixty-seven percent of visitor groups’ primary reason for traveling to the Congaree National Park area (within 1-hour drive of park) was to visit Congaree National Park. On this visit, the most common activities were walking/hiking (89%) and visiting the visitor center (76%). • In regard to use, importance, and quality of visitor services and facilities, it is important to note the number of visitor groups that responded to each question. The most used services/facilities by the 318 visitor groups included restrooms (86%), trails (82%), and park trail map (79%). The services/facilities that received the highest combined proportions of “extremely important” and “very important” ratings included trails (98%, N=249), restrooms (94%, N=264), and directional signs-in park (89%, N=224). The services/facilities that received the highest combined proportions of “very good” and “good” ratings included ranger-led programs (97%, N=59), trails (97%, N=244), and restrooms (95%, N=261). • The average of total expenditures in and outside the park (within 1-hour drive of park) per visitor group was $103. The median visitor group expenditure (50% of groups spent more, 50% of group spent less) was $24. The average per capita expenditure was $40. • Most visitor groups (97%) rated the overall quality of services, facilities, and recreational opportunities at Congaree National Park as “very good” or “good.” Two percent of groups rated the overall quality as “very poor” or “poor.” For more information about the Visitor Services Project, please contact the Park Studies Unit at the University of Idaho or at the following website http://www.psu.uidaho.edu Congaree National Park – VSP Visitor Study April 15-24, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................................1 Organization of the report.....................................................................................................................1 Presentation of the results ...................................................................................................................2 METHODS......................................................................................................................................................3 Survey Design.........................................................................................................................................3 Sample size and sampling plan .........................................................................................................3 Questionnaire design ..........................................................................................................................3 Survey procedure................................................................................................................................3 Data Analysis ..........................................................................................................................................4 Limitations ...............................................................................................................................................4 Special Conditions .................................................................................................................................5 Checking Non-response Bias ..............................................................................................................5 RESULTS .......................................................................................................................................................6 Demographics.........................................................................................................................................6 Visitor group size.................................................................................................................................6 Visitor group type ................................................................................................................................6 Visitor age............................................................................................................................................7 Visitor level of education.....................................................................................................................7 Respondent ethnicity ..........................................................................................................................7 Respondent race.................................................................................................................................8 Number of times visiting Congaree National Park in the last five years..........................................8 Number of times visiting the park in lifetime......................................................................................8 U.S. visitor state of residence.............................................................................................................9 International visitors ..........................................................................................................................10 Visitors with disabilities/impairments ...............................................................................................10 Information Prior to Visit.....................................................................................................................11 Sources of information ......................................................................................................................11 Effect of name change......................................................................................................................12 Visitor awareness..............................................................................................................................13 Information During Visit ......................................................................................................................14 Primary reason for visiting the area .................................................................................................14 Other sites visited in the area...........................................................................................................14 Trails used .........................................................................................................................................15 Activity................................................................................................................................................17 Length of visit ....................................................................................................................................18 Number of times entered the park ...................................................................................................19
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Story of Congaree National Park
    University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Senior Theses Honors College Winter 12-15-2015 Deeply Rooted: The tS ory of Congaree National Park Taylor Karlin University of South Carolina - Columbia Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/senior_theses Part of the Biodiversity Commons, Biology Commons, and the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Recommended Citation Karlin, Taylor, "Deeply Rooted: The tS ory of Congaree National Park" (2015). Senior Theses. 53. https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/senior_theses/53 This Thesis is brought to you by the Honors College at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Senior Theses by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Senior Theses Honors College Winter 12-15-2015 Deeply Rooted: The tS ory of Congaree National Park Taylor Waters Karlin Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarcommons.sc.edu/senior_theses Part of the Biodiversity Commons, Biology Commons, and the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Recommended Citation Karlin, Taylor Waters, "Deeply Rooted: The tS ory of Congaree National Park" (2015). Senior Theses. Paper 53. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors College at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Senior Theses by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Deeply Rooted: The Story of Congaree National Park Deeply Rooted: The Story of Congaree National Park Taylor Karlin Authored and photographed by Taylor Karlin Table of Contents The Park Itself 2-5 Nature Guide 12-15 Introduction 2 Native Animals 13 Map 3 Native Plants 14 Specific Parts 4-5 Invasive Species 15 Historical Significance 6 Management 16 Cultural Significance 7 How To Get Involved 17 Natural Significance 8-11 Recreational Activities 18-21 Leave No Trace 22-23 1 The Park Itself The Congaree National Park is a natural wonder amidst a cosmopolitan world.
    [Show full text]
  • Life in the Wild Volume 1
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service South Carolina Lowcountry Refuge Complex Life in the Wild June 1, 2009 News from Cape Romain, Ernest F. Hollings Volume 1 ACE Basin, Santee and Waccamaw National Wildlife Refuges From Sea Breeze to Cypress Knees South Carolina Lowcountry Refuge Complex is home to four national wildlife refuges, each offering a unique recreational experience for Lowcountry visitors. From sea breeze to cypress knees, Lowcountry Refuges are yours to enjoy. Osprey at sunset, photo: © Marc Epstein Cape Romain NWR is 30 minutes Headquartered near Adams Run, the Waccamaw NWR, established in 1997, north of Charleston on Highway 17. Ernest F. Hollings ACE Basin NWR is the newest refuge in the Refuge Accessible only by boat, the 66,267-acre was established in 1990 to protect and Complex. Refuge lands currently total refuge extends 22 miles along the coast, manage for migratory birds, native in excess of 22,000 acres, including the a dazzling array of barrier islands, rich species, endangered and threatened diverse wetland habitats and species rich salt marsh, sparkling tidal creeks, sandy species, and to provide educational and riverine ecosystems of the Waccamaw beaches and dunes, and maritime forest. recreational opportunities on 11,815 and Pee Dee Rivers. Outdoor sports Approximately 29,000 acres of the refuge acres. The Refuge supports a diversity enthusiasts can enjoy hunting, fishing, are designated as Class I Wilderness. of habitats including forested wetlands, kayaking and hiking, and nature Cape Romain NWR is known throughout forested uplands, salt marsh, brackish photography at the newly opened Cox North and South America for its vital marsh, and managed impoundments.
    [Show full text]
  • South Carolina Is Just Right. Blue-Green Mountains, Green Grasslands, Blackwater Swamps, Bright White Beaches and Sun-Struck Islands
    South Carolina is Just right. Blue-green mountains, green grasslands, blackwater swamps, bright white beaches and sun-struck islands. That’s South Carolina. Discover whitewater rivers, brightly colored cars, silver airplanes and green oaks. South Carolina is a living coloring book with black-and-white-striped lighthouses, red apples, yellow-pink peaches, green-and-red watermelons and earth-toned forts and ruins. Unique landforms, parks, historic sites, towns and cities help make South Carolina a land that’s just right for work, life and play. From A to Z, color South Carolina “Just right.” A—Color My Autos & Airplanes We don’t just drive cars and fly airplanes. We make them! BMW builds cars in Greer, and Boeing makes the 787-8 Dreamliner in North Charleston. And in the near future, we’ll make Volvos and Mercedes-Benz Vans, too! The road is wide open, and the sky is the limit! Color our future bright! IT’S A FACT! An empty 787 airplane weighs as much as 29 elephants. BMW stands for Bavarian Motor Works. B—Color My Bridges Poinsett Bridge looks like a fort. People walk across a waterfall on Greenville’s Liberty Bridge. Artists paint Columbia’s Gervais Street Bridge. The Ravenel Bridge can handle 300 mile-per-hour winds and take you to Charleston’s Rainbow Row. In South Carolina, you can get from here to there! C—Color My Carolina Bays Animals, plants and bugs live in strange, egg-shaped swamps called Carolina bays. The Venus flytrap, a plant that eats flies and other bugs, grows in some bays.
    [Show full text]
  • The Places Nobody Knows
    THE OWNER’S GUIDE SERIES VOLUME 3 nobodthe places y knows Presented by the National Park Foundation www.nationalparks.org About the Author: Kelly Smith Trimble lives, hikes, gardens, and writes in North Cascades National Park Knoxville, Tennessee. She earned a B.A. in English from Sewanee: The University of the South and an M.S. in Environmental Studies from Green Mountain College. When not writing about gardening and the outdoors, Kelly can be found growing vegetables, volunteering for conservation organizations, hiking and canoeing the Southeast, and traveling to national parks. Copyright 2013 National Park Foundation. 1110 Vermont Ave NW, Suite 200, Washington DC 20005 www.nationalparks.org NATIONALPARKS.ORG | 2 Everybody loves Yosemite, Yellowstone, and the Grand Canyon, and with good reason. Those and other icons of the National Park System are undeniably spectacular, and to experience their wonders is well worth braving the crowds they inevitably draw. But lest you think the big names are the whole story, consider that the vast park network also boasts plenty of less well-known destinations that are beautiful, historic, or culturally significant—or all of the above. Some of these gems are off the beaten track, others are slowly rising to prominence, and a few are simply overshadowed by bigger, better-publicized parks. But these national parks, monuments, historic places, and recreation areas are overlooked by many, and that’s a mistake you won’t want to make. nobodthe places y knows For every Yosemite, there’s a lesser-known park where the scenery shines and surprises. NATIONALPARKS.ORG | 3 1 VISIT: Bandelier National Monument VISIT: Big South Fork National River and IF YOU LOVE: Mesa Verde National Park Recreation Area FOR: Archaeologist’sthe dream placesIF YOU LOVE: Olympic National Park FOR: A range of outdoor recreation Few and precious places give us great insight Any traveler to Olympic National Park can 1| into the civilizations that lived on this land long 2| confirm that variety truly is the spice of life, before it was called the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • SOUTH CAROLINA Our Land, Our Water, Our Heritage
    SOUTH CAROLINA Our Land, Our Water, Our Heritage LWCF Funded Places in LWCF Success in South Carolina South Carolina The Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) has provided funding to Federal Program help protect some of South Carolina’s most special places and ensure ACE Basin NWR Cape Romain NWR recreational access for hunting, fishing and other outdoor activities. *Chattooga WSR South Carolina has received approximately $303.5 million in LWCF Congaree NP funding over the past five decades, protecting places such as Fort Cowpens NB Sumter National Monument, Cape Romain, Waccamaw and Ace Basin Fort Sumter NM National Wildlife Refuges, Congaree National Park, and Francis Marion Francis Marion NF National Forest as well as sites protected under the Civil War Battlefield *Longleaf Pine Initiative Preservation Program Ninety Six NHS Sumter-Francis Marion NF Forest Legacy Program (FLP) grants are also funded under LWCF, to Sumter NF help protect working forests. The FLP cost-share funding supports Waccamaw NWR timber sector jobs and sustainable forest operations while enhancing Federal Total $ 196,300,000 wildlife habitat, water quality and recreation. For example, the FLP contributed to places such as the Catawba-Wateree Forest in Chester Forest Legacy Program County and the Savannah River Corridor in Hampton County. The FLP $ 39,400,000 assists states and private forest owners to maintain working forest lands through matching grants for permanent conservation easement and fee Habitat Conservation (Sec. 6) acquisitions, and has leveraged approximately $39 million in federal $ 1,700,000 funds to invest in South Carolina’s forests, while protecting air and water quality, wildlife habitat, access for recreation and other public American Battlefield Protection benefits provided by forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1464 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1132
    § 1132 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION Page 1464 Department and agency having jurisdiction of, and reports submitted to Congress regard- thereover immediately before its inclusion in ing pending additions, eliminations, or modi- the National Wilderness Preservation System fications. Maps, legal descriptions, and regula- unless otherwise provided by Act of Congress. tions pertaining to wilderness areas within No appropriation shall be available for the pay- their respective jurisdictions also shall be ment of expenses or salaries for the administra- available to the public in the offices of re- tion of the National Wilderness Preservation gional foresters, national forest supervisors, System as a separate unit nor shall any appro- priations be available for additional personnel and forest rangers. stated as being required solely for the purpose of managing or administering areas solely because (b) Review by Secretary of Agriculture of classi- they are included within the National Wilder- fications as primitive areas; Presidential rec- ness Preservation System. ommendations to Congress; approval of Con- (c) ‘‘Wilderness’’ defined gress; size of primitive areas; Gore Range-Ea- A wilderness, in contrast with those areas gles Nest Primitive Area, Colorado where man and his own works dominate the The Secretary of Agriculture shall, within ten landscape, is hereby recognized as an area where years after September 3, 1964, review, as to its the earth and its community of life are un- suitability or nonsuitability for preservation as trammeled by man, where man himself is a visi- wilderness, each area in the national forests tor who does not remain. An area of wilderness classified on September 3, 1964 by the Secretary is further defined to mean in this chapter an area of undeveloped Federal land retaining its of Agriculture or the Chief of the Forest Service primeval character and influence, without per- as ‘‘primitive’’ and report his findings to the manent improvements or human habitation, President.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1517 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1131 (Pub. L
    Page 1517 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1131 (Pub. L. 88–363, § 10, July 7, 1964, 78 Stat. 301.) Sec. 1132. Extent of System. § 1110. Liability 1133. Use of wilderness areas. 1134. State and private lands within wilderness (a) United States areas. The United States Government shall not be 1135. Gifts, bequests, and contributions. liable for any act or omission of the Commission 1136. Annual reports to Congress. or of any person employed by, or assigned or de- § 1131. National Wilderness Preservation System tailed to, the Commission. (a) Establishment; Congressional declaration of (b) Payment; exemption of property from attach- policy; wilderness areas; administration for ment, execution, etc. public use and enjoyment, protection, preser- Any liability of the Commission shall be met vation, and gathering and dissemination of from funds of the Commission to the extent that information; provisions for designation as it is not covered by insurance, or otherwise. wilderness areas Property belonging to the Commission shall be In order to assure that an increasing popu- exempt from attachment, execution, or other lation, accompanied by expanding settlement process for satisfaction of claims, debts, or judg- and growing mechanization, does not occupy ments. and modify all areas within the United States (c) Individual members of Commission and its possessions, leaving no lands designated No liability of the Commission shall be im- for preservation and protection in their natural puted to any member of the Commission solely condition, it is hereby declared to be the policy on the basis that he occupies the position of of the Congress to secure for the American peo- member of the Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Guides and Maps for South Carolina Rivers and Waterways
    Guides & Maps for South Carolina Rivers & Waterways This is a listing of information sources with Internet links provided by S.C. Department of Natural Resources - Scenic Rivers Program PO Box 167, Columbia, SC 29202 – 803-734-9096 www.dnr.sc.gov/water/river (February 18, 2021) Guides and Maps South Carolina Scenic Rivers - Ten State Scenic Rivers are described at SCDNR’s website. Water Trail Guides Paddle SC - A statewide coalition is working to improve are available for two Scenic Rivers, the Lynches and public access to blueways / paddle trails; and their Little Pee Dee (of Dillon). View or download guides website presents information and maps as a guide to from the Publications webpage. Hardcopies for Lynches paddling rivers and waterways of South Carolina. are available upon request. Call (803) 734-9096. Paddling South Carolina - A Guide to Palmetto State Edisto River Basin Boating Guide - Hardcopies of this River Trails - The revised 2001 book by Gene Able and guide are available for purchase from SCDNR and it may Jack Horan, published by Sandlapper Publishing, Inc. is a be viewed or downloaded from the webpage. comprehensive guide to paddling most of the state's rivers. It’s available at many bookstores and libraries. Berkeley County Blueways - Santee River, Wadboo Creek, Wambaw Creek, Lake Moultrie, Goose Creek Canoe Kayak South Carolina - A Guide to Paddling the Reservoir and other water trails are described in the Palmetto State - The 2014 book by Paul Ferguson, online guide to paddling Berkeley County waterways. published by Pocosin Press is another comprehensive guide to rivers of South Carolina.
    [Show full text]
  • Life in the Wild October, 2011 News from Cape Romain, Ernest F
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service South Carolina Lowcountry Refuges Complex Life in the Wild October, 2011 News from Cape Romain, Ernest F. Hollings ACE Basin, Santee and Waccamaw National Volume 4 Wildlife Refuges Avian Adventure By Captain Chris Crolley, Naturalist, Coastal Expeditions The Island Cat is fully loaded this morning and we are beginning our journey through the oyster-lined tidal creek. Coastal Expeditions began this adventure with Cape Romain Refuge in 1994 as the Concessionaire for group services. Nearly five years had passed since Hurricane Hugo so we were on hand to witness the Island’s attempts to heal itself from Hugo’s landfall. Today we continue to bear witness to environmental challenges of both natural and human origin. From the very beginning, it has been a privilege Pelicans fly alongside the ferry en route to an adventure on Bulls Island. and a personal awakening to study and Credit: Tom Blagdon experience the islands and estuaries of nest in Cape Romain and nearly 30% of sharp scissors. Their underbite cleaves Cape Romain, and to spend time with all the Atlantic coast population overwinter the waters, feeling for and enveloping here. small fish and shellfish on the fly. The the fascinating people we encounter on skimmer is the only bird in the world whose lower bill is longer than the upper. this remarkable seascape. “I never for a day gave up listening to They command their place in the food the songs of our birds, or watching their chain, hunting in twos and threes on the We aren’t alone in our enthusiasm.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. 2. Mountains Lie in Part of Which Three South Carolina Counties?
    DAILY GEOGRAPHY WEEK SIX Name _________________ Date __________ 1. Mountains lie in part of which three South Carolina 1. _____________________ counties? _____________________ _____________________ 2. South Carolina’s mountains are known by what 2. _____________________ collective name? 3. The Blue Ridge Mountains are part of which chain 3. _____________________ of mountains that extends from Maine to Georgia? 4. What process is wearing away the Blue Ridge 4. _____________________ Mountains? 5. Where is the highest point in South Carolina? 5. _____________________ 6. At what point do South Carolina, North Carolina, 6. _____________________ and Georgia meet? 7. Which South Carolina mountain lake has more than 7. _____________________ twenty waterfalls flowing into it? 8. Many trees in the Blue Ridge region are deciduous. 8. _____________________ What is the primary characteristic of deciduous trees? 9. What incomplete railroad tunnel, near the mountain 9. _____________________ town of Walhalla, was once used to age Clemson Blue Cheese? 10. The region’s temperate weather, with cool nights and sunny days, aids in growing which kind of fruit? 10. _____________________ DAILY GEOGRAPHY WEEK SEVEN Name _________________ Date __________ 1. What geographical term means “at the foot of the 1. _____________________ mountains”? 2. Describe the Piedmont Region of South Carolina. 2. _____________________ 3. What is the geographical term for a large, low area 3. _____________________ of land between areas of high land? 4. Describe the soil in the Piedmont of South Carolina. 4. _____________________ 5. Native Americans in the Piedmont linked camps and 5. _____________________ resources and also traded along what route? 6. What important Piedmont Revolutionary War battle 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulation 61-69 Classified Waters
    Regulation 61-69 Classified Waters Disclaimer DHEC provides this copy of the regulation for the convenience of the public and makes every effort to ensure its accuracy. However, this is an unofficial version of the regulation. The regulation's most recent final publication in the South Carolina State Register presents the official, legal version of the regulation. 2600 Bull Street | Columbia, SC 29201 S.C. Code Sections 48-1-10 et seq. December 12, 1977 - 1 16 August 1, 1979 - 3 17 April 11, 1980 - 4 6, Part 1 July 27, 1984 411 8 7 June 28, 1985 458, 459, 460 9 6 March 27, 1987 653 11 3 January 22, 1988 778 12 1 April 22, 1988 859 12 4 May 27, 1988 830 12 5 June 24, 1988 855 12 6 February 24, 1989 936 13 2 March 24, 1989 984 13 3 April 28, 1989 989 13 4 June 23, 1989 863 and 1052 13 6 April 27, 1990 1039 14 5 April 24, 1992 1385 and 1402 16 4 May 28, 1993 1466 17 5, Part 1 May 23, 1997 1928 21 5 June 26, 1998 2178 and 2221 22 6, Part 2 May 26, 2000 2455 and 2456 24 5 May 24, 2002 2637 26 5, Part 1 May 28, 2004 2854 28 5 June 23, 2006 3025 30 6 June 22, 2012 4212 36 6 June 26, 2020 4885 44 6 A. Criteria for Classes. .................................................................................................................................... 1 B. Tributaries to Classified Waters. .............................................................................................................. 1 C. Status of Classifications and Reviews. ..................................................................................................... 1 D. No Discharge Zone Designations.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Congaree National Park Wildland Fire Management Plan FY 2004 2 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7 1.1 Reason for Development of Fire Management Plan-----------------------------------------------------------------7 1.2 Collaborative Processes-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------7 1.3 Implementation of Fire Management Policy -------------------------------------------------------------------------7 1.3.1 2001 Federal Fire Policy------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------8 1.3.2 Managing Impacts of Wildfires—A Cohesive Strategy--------------------------------------------------------9 1.3.3 A Collaborative Approach for Reducing Wildland Fire Risks---------------------------------------------- 10 1.4 Environmental Compliance------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 1.5 Authorities for Implementing Fire Management Plan ------------------------------------------------------------ 11 2.0 RELATIONSHIP TO LAND MANAGEMENT PLANNING AND FIRE POLICY -----13 2.1 Federal Fire Management Policy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 13 2.2 Establishment of Congaree National Park -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 14 2.3 General Management Plan Objectives ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]