{DOWNLOAD} German Battlecruisers of World War One: Their Design

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

{DOWNLOAD} German Battlecruisers of World War One: Their Design GERMAN BATTLECRUISERS OF WORLD WAR ONE: THEIR DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATIONS PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Gary Staff | 320 pages | 30 Jul 2014 | Pen & Sword Books Ltd | 9781848322134 | English | Barnsley, United Kingdom SMS Derfflinger - Wikipedia The lead ship, Ersatz Yorck , was the only vessel of the three to have begun construction, though she was over two years from completion by the time work was abandoned. The ship was broken up on the slipway and machinery that had been assembled for Ersatz Gneisenau was installed in the first four Type U U-boats. Nevertheless, the work that had gone into the Ersatz Yorck design was not a wasted effort; when the design staff began work on the Scharnhorst -class battleships in the s, they used the plans for Ersatz Yorck as a starting point. The Reichsmarineamt RMA — Imperial Naval Office decided that to meet the requirements set in the law, the Navy should construct one battleship and one battlecruiser every year between and , with an additional unit of both types in and The RMA initially believed the war would be over quickly, but by early , it had become clear that it would not be the case. As a result, it made the decision to use the prescribed construction program to replace the five armored cruisers that had been sunk in the first six months of the war with new battlecruisers, rather than lay down new battleships. The last three of these new battlecruisers were ordered to replace Yorck and the two Scharnhorst -class cruisers , the former having been sunk by German mines in November and the latter pair being sunk at the Battle of the Falkland Islands the following month. The three vessels of the Ersatz Yorck class were to have been members of the Mackensen class , and initial funding for the ships was allocated on 21 February Vizeadmiral Vice Admiral Reinhard Scheer , the commander of the High Seas Fleet , expressed his preference for GK2, the largest and fastest of the versions with a top speed of Some consideration was given to the idea that the new battlecruiser design should represent a merging of the battleship and battlecruiser types—what was later termed a " fast battleship "—a concept Wilhelm II had been pushing for years. The so-called " grosskampfschiff " large combat ship would simplify construction and design work, but Konteradmiral Rear Admiral Georg Hebbinghaus , the head of the General Navy Department, pointed out that under the German Naval Laws, such a change would not be permitted and that the laws would need to be rewritten to allow the new type. Hebbinghaus nevertheless allowed that the design staff had some leeway in warship development that could be used to get around the legal restrictions. In a meeting on 12 August, Hebbinghaus stated that he wanted to build ships that were similar to traditional battleship designs, preferring survivability to offensive power; he argued that the Mackensen s should be cancelled in favor of this new type, since they had been designed before the navy had any war experience on which to base them. Capelle stated that the last three Mackensen s— Ersatz Yorck , Ersatz Scharnhorst , and Ersatz Gneisenau —and Ersatz Friedrich Carl if work had not proceeded too far along, should be reordered as a completely new design, GK6, which he submitted. Scheer objected to the decrease in speed, and for the time being, Hebbinghaus's and Capelle's proposals came to nothing. Another meeting on 24 August concluded that all seven ships of the Mackensen class would be built as designed, the General Navy Department noting that they would "still undoubtedly represent a very valuable addition to the fleet in By this time, much of the construction resources of the German Navy had been redirected to the U-boat fleet, so the new ships could not be completed before ; as a result, the Mackensen s would be inferior to the latest American and British designs. By that time, Ersatz Friedrich Carl had been laid down the previous November, and was too far along to be converted, leaving the last three Mackensen s as the only members available to be rearmed. Indeed, Ersatz Yorck had already been laid down in July. During the re-design process, Scheer requested that the new ships have increased armament, armor, and speed compared to the first four Mackensen s, but owing to the constraints imposed, only the armament could be increased, and the deck armor and speed had to be reduced slightly to keep displacement in check. The length and draft were also increased to keep the ships' speed from falling too much. Since the ships' propulsion systems had already been ordered, they were kept essentially identical to the original Mackensen design, although internal rearrangements allowed the boilers to be trunked into one large funnel rather than the two of the Mackensen s, which conferred several advantages. These included a significant reduction in smoke interference with the spotting tops and additional room to move the tripod mast further aft, which reduced the risk of the mast falling on the conning tower in the event of battle damage and increased the field of view from the spotting top. The Ersatz Yorck -class ships were an enlargement of the previous Mackensen -class ships. They were Ersatz Yorck had the same beam as the earlier vessels, at The Ersatz Yorck -class ships' hulls were to have been constructed with longitudinal steel frames with the outer plating riveted on. The hulls were divided into eighteen watertight compartments. As with all German battlecruisers that had been built, the Ersatz Yorck -class ships would have been equipped with four sets of Parsons steam turbines , [7] each of which drove a 3-bladed screw that was 4. The turbines were supplied with steam by 24 coal-fired Schulz-Thornycroft single-ended boilers and 8 oil-fired Schulz-Thornycroft double-ended boilers. The ships were to have electrical power provided by diesel generators. The Ersatz Yorck s were intended to mount a pair of rudders side by side for steering. However, the areas of the hull between the torpedo bulkhead and the outer wall of the ship were also used for fuel storage. In both designs the turrets were arranged in two superfiring pairs, one forward and the other aft. The guns had to be returned to 2. Each turret was fitted with a stereo rangefinder. The shell allotment was divided between armor piercing and high explosive versions, with 60 of the former and 30 of the latter. These guns were intended for defense against torpedo boats , and were supplied with a total of 2, shells. The question about the main battery for the new battlecruisers was the most pressing; the previous Derfflinger class was armed with This meant that an increase in displacement would necessitate a longer and wider hull to keep any increases in draft minimal and avoid reducing the speed. The constraints on enlarging the hull were compounded by restrictions on width imposed by the locks of the canal in Wilhelmshaven. The design staff suggested using triple or even quadruple gun turrets to keep the displacement under the 30,ton limit. The question of whether the new ships should be powered entirely by oil-fired boilers was less controversial. The design staff was generally in agreement with the standard practice of using coal-fired boilers for two-thirds of the power plant, with the remainder being oil-fired boilers. Coal-fired boilers were preferred because the coal, stored in the sides of the ship, provided additional protection, particularly for the battlecruisers, which carried less armor than their battleship counterparts. This was the same type of construction as in the preceding Derfflinger -class battlecruisers, and was intended to save weight compared to the traditional method of construction, which incorporated both longitudinal and transverse frames. Experience with previous battlecruiser designs led to the adoption of a continuous upper deck, which raised the level of the deck aft. This was necessary because the aft decks of earlier designs were usually awash when steaming at high speed, even in calm seas. The ships were also equipped with a bulbous bow to reduce drag on the hull, the first time the feature was used in the German Navy. Service as a squadron flagship would increase that number by an additional 14 officers and 62 sailors. The vessels carried a number of small boats, including two picket boats, one barge, two launches , two cutters, and three yawls. The ships of the Mackensen class were equipped with four sets of marine-type turbine engines , each of which drove a three-bladed screw propeller that was 4. The ships had 24 coal-fired marine-type single ended boilers and eight oil-fired marine-type boilers. The turrets were mounted in superfiring pairs fore and aft of the main superstructure. The guns were supplied with a total of armor-piercing shells, or 90 per gun. As with other heavy German guns, these weapons used a fore propellant charge in a silk bag with a main charge in a brass case. The ships' secondary battery consisted of fourteen 15 cm 5. The guns had a sustained rate of fire of 7 rounds per minute. The shells were The guns were expected to fire around 1, shells before they needed to be replaced. The ships were also armed with eight 8. Four were arranged around the rear superfiring main battery turret and the other four around the forward conning tower. As was standard for warships of the period, the Mackensen s were equipped with submerged torpedo tubes. The Mackensen - class ships were protected with Krupp cemented steel armor , as was the standard for German warships of the period.
Recommended publications
  • US COLD WAR AIRCRAFT CARRIERS Forrestal, Kitty Hawk and Enterprise Classes
    US COLD WAR AIRCRAFT CARRIERS Forrestal, Kitty Hawk and Enterprise Classes BRAD ELWARD ILLUSTRATED BY PAUL WRIGHT © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com NEW VANGUARD 211 US COLD WAR AIRCRAFT CARRIERS Forrestal, Kitty Hawk and Enterprise Classes BRAD ELWARD ILLUSTRATED BY PAUL WRIGHT © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 4 ORIGINS OF THE CARRIER AND THE SUPERCARRIER 5 t World War II Carriers t Post-World War II Carrier Developments t United States (CVA-58) THE FORRESTAL CLASS 11 FORRESTAL AS BUILT 14 t Carrier Structures t The Flight Deck and Hangar Bay t Launch and Recovery Operations t Stores t Defensive Systems t Electronic Systems and Radar t Propulsion THE FORRESTAL CARRIERS 20 t USS Forrestal (CVA-59) t USS Saratoga (CVA-60) t USS Ranger (CVA-61) t USS Independence (CVA-62) THE KITTY HAWK CLASS 26 t Major Differences from the Forrestal Class t Defensive Armament t Dimensions and Displacement t Propulsion t Electronics and Radars t USS America, CVA-66 – Improved Kitty Hawk t USS John F. Kennedy, CVA-67 – A Singular Class THE KITTY HAWK AND JOHN F. KENNEDY CARRIERS 34 t USS Kitty Hawk (CVA-63) t USS Constellation (CVA-64) t USS America (CVA-66) t USS John F. Kennedy (CVA-67) THE ENTERPRISE CLASS 40 t Propulsion t Stores t Flight Deck and Island t Defensive Armament t USS Enterprise (CVAN-65) BIBLIOGRAPHY 47 INDEX 48 © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com US COLD WAR AIRCRAFT CARRIERS FORRESTAL, KITTY HAWK AND ENTERPRISE CLASSES INTRODUCTION The Forrestal-class aircraft carriers were the world’s first true supercarriers and served in the United States Navy for the majority of America’s Cold War with the Soviet Union.
    [Show full text]
  • Adobe PDF File
    BOOK REVIEWS David B. Quinn. European Approaches to North analyse social and demographic trends and so America, 1450-1640. Variorum Collected Studies; have been unfashionable for more than a decade" Aldershot and Brookfield, VT: Variorum Press, (221). It is, however, useful for historians and 1998. x + 342 pp., illustrations, maps, charts, others interested in the past to know what hap• index. US $101.95, cloth; ISBN 0-86078-769-9. pened, or at least what is likely to have happened. Quinn may be no exponent of the latest Paris fad This most recent collection of David Quinn's but he remains a scholar whose interpretation of essays on the early European exploration and events inevitably commands respect, precisely settlement of North America follows his Explor• because he is always more interested in making ers and Colonies: America, 1500-1625 (London, sense of the document than in validating a theo• 1990). Like its useful predecessor, European retical preconception. Approaches brings together Quinn's contributions What of the longer essays in this volume, in to several disparate publications. Although most which Quinn cautiously dons the unfamiliar of the essays in the present volume have appeared analytic robe? "Englishmen and Others" is a blunt in scholarly journals or conference proceedings and therefore interesting assessment of how since the late 1980s, that previous exposure does Quinn's compatriots viewed themselves and other not detract from the usefulness of this book. The Europeans on the eve of colonization. The final topics range from imagined Atlantic islands, to essay, "Settlement Patterns in Early Modern perceptions of American ecology, the French fur Colonization," is an analysis of the state of early trade, the settlement of Bermuda, editing Hakluyt, European colonization by 1700.
    [Show full text]
  • Report Japanese Submarine 1124
    REPORT JAPANESE SUBMARINE 1124 Mike McCarthy Maritime Archaeology Department WAMaritime Museum Cliff Street, Fremantle, WA 6160 October 1990 With research, advice and technical assistance from Captain David Tomlinson Or David Ramm Or J. Fabris Or Thomas O. Paine Mr Garrick Gray Mr George G. Thompson Mr Henri Bourse Mr J. Bastian Mr P.J. Washington RACAL The Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade The Department of the Arts, Sport, the Environment, Tourism and Territories Underwater Systems Australia Report-Department of Maritime Archaeology, Western Australian Museum, No. 43 2 Background to the report In July 1988, a wreck believed to be the SS Koombanah, which disappeared with all hands in waters off Western Australia in 1921, was officially reported to the W. A. Museum and the federal government by Captain David Tomlinson, (Master/owner of the Darwin based Research Vessel Flamingo Bay) and Mr Mike Barron, a Tasmanian associate of Tomlinson's, fr;om the Commonwealth Fisheries. In order to facilitate an inspection of the site, it was decided on analysis of the available options and in the light of the W.A. Museum's policy of involving the finders where possible, to join with Messrs Tomlinson and Barron in an inspection out of Darwin on board the RV Flamingo Bay, a very well equipped and most suitable vessel for such a venture. Due to the depth of the water in which the site lay and the distance off­ shore, this required not only the charter of Flamingo Bay which normally runs at circa $2000 per day, but also the hire of a sophisticated position fixing system, a Remote Operated Submersible Vehicle with camera (ROV), echo sounder and side scan sonar.
    [Show full text]
  • Causes of the First World War Lesson 4 the Arms Race
    Lesson 4 The Arms Race CAUSES OF THE FIRST WORLD WAR LESSON 4 THE ARMS RACE Objectives/learning outcomes Starter Pupils will:- Discuss with pupils why countries need weapons. What are the threats today? What Know what the term ‘arms race’ were the threats in 1914? means and why this increased the How much does Britain spend on defence? tension between the major powers. Show diagram. Understand why the building of the Get pupils to understand the amount in dreadnought led to a naval arms comparison to other government spending. race. Defence: £44bn Education: £42bn Transport: Evaluate through sources whether £15bn. Germany wanted a war in 1914. Explain Militarism: building up armed forces; getting ready for war. Can this be applied to some countries today? Why did this happen up to 1914? Activities and homework Plenary Give pupils the following words/phrases:- Activity 1 The Arms Race Fear Activity 2 Jealousy The Dreadnought and the Naval Arms Naval Superiority Race Empire building [A linked cause] Activity 3 Worsening relations Did Germany want a war in 1914? More money spent on armaments Ask them to start with one word/phrase and Homework answer orally the question, ‘How did the arms Homework 1 Cartoon Analysis race help cause the First World War?’ [Advanced] Homework 1 Admiral Von Tirpitz They can use any of the other words/phrases [Standard] to answer the question. Causes of the First World War History Interactive© 1 Lesson 4 The Arms Race STARTER ACTIVITY Britain’s Defence Spending 2009 Equipment • £6.1bn Pay • £5.6bn • £2.6bn Wars Afghanistan • £2bn Iraq War pensions • £1bn Weapons • 27bn About £45 billion Causes of the First World War History Interactive© 2 Lesson 4 The Arms Race ACTIVITY 1 THE ARMS RACE How did the Arms Race add to the tensions between the major powers? ARMS RACE This was competition between countries to build up their military strength.
    [Show full text]
  • Theromseymodellernovember2
    NOVEMBER 2013 THIS MONTH This month’s Romsey Modeller is the biggest yet running to an extortionate 34 pages! Much of the content is focused on the club’s first display at Scale ModelWorld which proved to be a brilliant weekend. Both Paul and I couldn’t have been happier with our display which was one of the best presented in the hall. One sad piece of news concerns Brian Boot who’s article on his Vickers Valiant is found in this magazine. Brian Sampson wrote to inform me that on his way to Telford the driver of the car in which Brain was travelling had a heart attack and hit the accelerator instead of the brake, they struck the barrier and ended in the ditch. Brian is currently in West Middlesex hospital flat on his back. Brain went see him at weekend and hopefully will have more news on Wednesday. I’m sure you will join me in sending Brian our best wishes and hopes for a speedy recovery. Just a reminder that it’s our annual competition on Wednesday , I am looking forward to seeing the results of this year’s efforts on the competition table. All the best Tony IPMS Club Secretary This is the newsletter of Romsey Modellers a group of plastic modellers based in Southern Hampshire. We cater for all modelling genres and skill levels from beginners to well seasoned gurus. We meet on the 1st and 3rd Wednesdays of the month from 8pm to 10pm in Ampfield, Hampshire, where we often run workshops and club competitions but more importantly have a good chat about our hobby.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrodynamic Design of Integrated Bulbous Bowlsonar Dome for Naval Ships
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Defence Science Journal Defence Science Journal, Vol. 55, No. I, January 2005, pp. 21-36 O 2005, DESIDOC Hydrodynamic Design of Integrated Bulbous Bowlsonar Dome for Naval Ships R. Sharma and O.P. Sha Indian Institute of Technology Khnragpur, Khnragpur-721 302 ABSTRACT Recently, the idea of bulbous bow has been extended from the commercial ships to the design of an integrated bow that houses a sonar dome for naval ships. In the present study, a design method for a particular set of requirements consisting of a narrow range of input parameters is presented. The method uses an approximate linear theory with sheltering effect for resistance estimation and pressure distribution, and correlation with statistical analysis from the existing literature and the tank-test results available in the public domain. Though the optimisation of design parameters has been done for the design speed, but the resistance performance over the entire speed range has been incorporated in the design. The bulb behaviour has been discussed using the principle of minimisation of resistance and analysis of flow pattern over the bulb and near the sonar dome. It also explores the possible benefits arising out of new design from the production, acoustic, and hydrodynamic point of view. The results of this study are presented in the form of design parameters (for the bulbous bow) related to the main hull parameters for a set of input data in a narrow range. Finally, the method has been used to design the bulbous bow for a surface combatant vessel.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyrighted Material
    BINDEX 06/25/2018 18:16:29 Page 379 INDEX ‘Ndrangheta, 261 Ambedkar, B. R., 115, 150, 238, 273, 1848 revolutions, 306 282, 311 1955 System, 137 American Civil War, 94 9/11, 178, 269, 273, 301, 302 American Constitution, 109, 318 Amin al-Husseini, Haj, 100 Aam Aadmi Party, 311 Amin, Idi, 127, 255 Abdullah of Jordan, King, 120 Amritsar Massacre (1919), 30, 48 Abe, Shinzo, 317 anarchism, 5, 10, 44, 61, 159, 219, 306 Aborigines, 38, 74, 265, 272, 275 Andaman Islands, 267 Abyssinia, 97, 250, 265 Anglo-Boer War, 16, 31, 39 Action Française, 59, 67, 81, 109, 225 Anglo-Egyptian Treaty (1936), 55 Adenauer, Konrad, 109, 132, 244 Anglo-Hindu law, 278 Advani, L. K., 171 Anglo-Iraq treaties; (1926), (1932) African National Congress, 142, 155, Anglo-Muhammadan law, 278 156, 176, 281, 312 Anglo-Russian Entente (1907), 22 Afrikaners, 31, 73, 127, 155, 279 animals in war, 210, 295 agricultural reforms, 54, 63, 75, 84, 85, Antarctica, 15 94, 119, 124, 127, 129, 134, 135, 146, Anthropocene, 214, 287, 295, 296 151, 153, 185, 232, 284, 291, 297, 307, Anthropology, 8, 179, 183, 186–189, 309, 316 192, 232, 234, 296 Ahmadiyya, 168, 234 anti-fascist resistance, 133 AIDS, 204, 205, 288, 289, 312, 323 Anti-French War, 123 Alawites, 22, 280 anti-hunting protests, 210, 295 Alexander I of Yugoslavia, King, 62 anti-Nazi resistance, 65 Alger Hiss case, 110 anti-Semitism, 16, 60, 66, 81, 100, 103, Algerian War of Independence,COPYRIGHTED 185 197, 243, 251,MATERIAL 256, 299, 308 Algérie Française, 156 Anti-US War, 123 Ali, Mehmet, 239, 240 anti-Vietnam War protests, 143, 200 Ali, Muhammad, 210 Antonius, George, 22, 28 Aligarh Muslim University, 207 Apartheid, 90, 127, 135, 156, 163, 174, Allahabad, 111, 276 176, 210, 255, 268, 279, 285, 296, 311, Allende, Salvador, 159 312 Allied Powers (First World War), 13, 96 Appadurai, Arjun, 6, 299 Remaking the Modern World 1900–2015: Global Connections and Comparisons, First Edition.
    [Show full text]
  • Primary Source and Background Documents D
    Note: Original spelling is retained for this document and all that follow. Appendix 1: Primary source and background documents Document No. 1: Germany's Declaration of War with Russia, August 1, 1914 Presented by the German Ambassador to St. Petersburg The Imperial German Government have used every effort since the beginning of the crisis to bring about a peaceful settlement. In compliance with a wish expressed to him by His Majesty the Emperor of Russia, the German Emperor had undertaken, in concert with Great Britain, the part of mediator between the Cabinets of Vienna and St. Petersburg; but Russia, without waiting for any result, proceeded to a general mobilisation of her forces both on land and sea. In consequence of this threatening step, which was not justified by any military proceedings on the part of Germany, the German Empire was faced by a grave and imminent danger. If the German Government had failed to guard against this peril, they would have compromised the safety and the very existence of Germany. The German Government were, therefore, obliged to make representations to the Government of His Majesty the Emperor of All the Russias and to insist upon a cessation of the aforesaid military acts. Russia having refused to comply with this demand, and having shown by this refusal that her action was directed against Germany, I have the honour, on the instructions of my Government, to inform your Excellency as follows: His Majesty the Emperor, my august Sovereign, in the name of the German Empire, accepts the challenge, and considers himself at war with Russia.
    [Show full text]
  • 216 Allan Sanford: Uss Ward
    #216 ALLAN SANFORD: USS WARD Steven Haller (SH): My name is Steven Haller, and I'm here with James P. Delgado, at the Sheraton Waikiki Hotel in Honolulu, Hawaii. It's December 5, 1991, at about 5:25 PM. And we have the pleasure to be interviewing Mr. Allan Sanford. Mr. Sanford was a Seaman First Class on the USS WARD, at the time of the Pearl Harbor attack. Mr.[Sanford], Ward's gun fired what is in essence the first shot of World War II, and so it's a great pleasure to be able to be talking with you today. We're going to be doing this tape as a part of the National Park Service and ARIZONA Memorial's oral history program. We're doing it in conjunction with KHET-TV in Honolulu. So thanks again for being with us today, Mr. Sanford. Allan Sanford: It's a pleasure to be here. SH: Good. How did you get into the Navy? AS: I joined the Naval reserve unit in St. Paul, Minnesota and with two others of my classmates in high school. And we enjoyed the meetings, and uniforms, and drills, and it was a nice social activity that was a little more mature than some of the high school activities that we had participated in. So we enjoyed the meetings of the St. Paul Naval reserve. And we called it also the Minnesota Naval Militia. However, in September 1940, the commanding officer of the unit came to the meeting and said, "Attention to orders, the Minnesota Naval Militia is hereby made part of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Tikkanen, Henrikki Leader Personality, Managerial Attention, and Disruptive Technologies
    This is an electronic reprint of the original article. This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Tikkanen, Henrikki Leader personality, managerial attention, and disruptive technologies Published in: MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATIONAL HISTORY DOI: 10.1080/17449359.2017.1308259 Published: 31/03/2017 Document Version Peer reviewed version Please cite the original version: Tikkanen, H. (2017). Leader personality, managerial attention, and disruptive technologies: the adoption of the battlecruiser concept in the Royal Navy, 1904–1918. MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATIONAL HISTORY, 12(1), 47-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449359.2017.1308259 This material is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, and duplication or sale of all or part of any of the repository collections is not permitted, except that material may be duplicated by you for your research use or educational purposes in electronic or print form. You must obtain permission for any other use. Electronic or print copies may not be offered, whether for sale or otherwise to anyone who is not an authorised user. Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) Tikkanen, Henrikki (2017) Leader Personality, Managerial Attention and Disruptive Technologies: The Adoption of the Battlecruiser Concept in the Royal Navy, 1904-1918, Management & Organizational History, 21(1), 47-75. Abstract Managerial attention to the leader’s strategic designs has been identified as a key prerequisite for success in the adoption of new technologies. The purpose of this study is to describe and analyze how the battlecruiser concept as an organizational gestalt was developed, adopted and assessed in the British Royal Navy (RN) in 1904- 1918 from the perspective of the top leader’s personality and managerial attention.
    [Show full text]
  • Uss-Sd Sd2.1
    U S S S O U T H D A K O T A BATTLESHIP X Schematic Design II January 2014 Battleship South Dakota Memorial Interpretive Objectives: Concept Design Visitors will appreciate USS South Dakota’s contribution to winning the war in the Pacific 01/22/14 Visitors will discover the advances in military technology that contributed to the ship’s success Visitors will consider the various types of leadership that led to success on the ship Background Visitors will learn about Captain Gatch’s role in training and leading the ship’s first crew USS South Dakota was the first of a new class of battleships that found fame in World War II. Her keel was laid in July of 1939; she was launched in June of 1941 and was commissioned in March of 1942. While her Visitors will experience elements of life on a battleship naval career was short, the SoDak was a legend before she had even served her first year and she went on to Visitors will compare the types of weapons used on the ship become the most decorated battleship of World War II for her exploits in the Pacific. Visitors will see the impact of naval treaties on ship design and power Decommissioned in 1947, by 1962 the ship was destined for demolition. When this news reached Sioux Falls, it spawned a local effort to acquire pieces of the battleship to create a memorial. The USS South Visitors will see there was a mutually beneficial relationship between aircraft carriers and battleships Dakota Battleship Memorial opened in September of 1969 to commemorate the battleship and its hearty crew.
    [Show full text]
  • Crónica De Un Viaje De Buceo a Scapa Flow. Islas Órcadas (Orkney)
    En 2010 hice un viaje de un mes por Escocia, con mi mujer y una pareja de amigos. Ninguno de ellos buceaba, pero, aún así, nos organizamos para que yo pudiese ir al agua, en Scapa Flow, durante dos días. Fueron mis cuatro primeras inmersiones en aguas frías, y me dejaron profundamente impresionado. Tanto que, tres años más tarde, en 2013, organicé con Carlos Blanco, mi compañero de buceo habitual, un viaje de doce días a las Órcadas (Orkney) para poder disfrutar plenamente de los pecios del Flow. El 31 de Agosto salimos de Las Palmas en un vuelo directo de RyanAir con destino a Edimburgo, a donde llegamos a las seis de la tarde, para recoger un coche de alquiler y emprender rápidamente los 425 Km. del viaje hasta el puerto de Scrabster, a donde llegamos pasadas las doce de la noche. Pasamos la noche en el Ferry Inn, en el mismo puerto, al lado de la terminal y, el domingo día 1 de septiembre, embarcamos, a las doce del mediodía, en el primer ferry de la Serco NorthLink con destino a Stromness. El viaje en el ferry fue terrible, olas de más de tres metros y un fuerte viento que no presagiaban nada bueno para el buceo de los días siguientes. Una espesa niebla lo cubría todo y ni siquiera se veían las islas cuando pasábamos por los estrechos. Finalmente llegamos a Stromness, bajo una ligera lluvia y nos dirigimos al Royal Hotel, donde nos alojaríamos durante nuestra estancia en las islas y, tras descargar el equipaje, fuimos a visitar Scapa Scuba, nuestro centro de buceo.
    [Show full text]