Elizaveta Svilova and Soviet Documentary Film

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Elizaveta Svilova and Soviet Documentary Film University of Southampton Research Repository ePrints Soton Copyright © and Moral Rights for this thesis are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder/s. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given e.g. AUTHOR (year of submission) "Full thesis title", University of Southampton, name of the University School or Department, PhD Thesis, pagination http://eprints.soton.ac.uk UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON FACULTY OF HUMANITIES Film Studies Elizaveta Svilova and Soviet Documentary Film by Christopher Penfold Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2013 UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON ABSTRACT FACULTY OF HUMANITIES Film Studies Doctor of Philosophy ELIZAVETA SVILOVA AND SOVIET DOCUMENTARY FILM By Christopher Penfold The focus of my research is Soviet documentary filmmaker, Elizaveta Svilova (1900- 75), most commonly remembered, if at all, as the wife and collaborator of acclaimed Soviet film pioneer, Dziga Vertov (1896-1954). Having worked with her husband for many years, Svilova continued her career as an independent director-editor after Vertov fell out of favour with the Central Committee. Employed at the Central Studio for Documentary Film, a state-initiated studio, Svilova’s films were vehicles of rhetoric, mobilised to inform, educate and persuade the masses. She draws on visual symbols familiar to audiences and organises them according to the semiotic theories – namely techniques of dialecticism and linkage – attributed to the Soviet montage school of the 1920s. On-screen credits indicate that, during the period 1939 to 1956, Svilova was the director-editor of over 100 documentaries and newsreel episodes, yet this corpus of films has received very little critical attention. As my thesis aims to demonstrate, the reasons for the lack of attention to Svilova’s films are partly due to her husband’s eminent status – the rules whereby we construct film history have resulted in Svilova’s contribution being absorbed into Vertov’s – and this is related to the long- standing tendency within film criticism to marginalise the female artist. My thesis also touches on issues regarding curatorial and archival policies, and provides an opportunity to rethink early film history and the modes through which historiographic and filmographic knowledge are transmitted. List of Contents Declaration of Authorship 1 Acknowledgements 3 Notes on Transliteration and Sources 5 Introduction 7 Chapter 1 13 The Context of Svilova’s Career Chapter 2 81 Evidence of Aggression: Oświęcim (1945) and Cinema Documents of the Atrocities of the German Fascist Invaders (1945) Chapter 3 135 Female Spectators and the Feminine Ideal Chapter 4 181 Foreign Lands and Depictions of Otherness Chapter 5 241 Conclusion Notes 253 Appendix 1 281 Elizaveta Svilova and Foreign Stories Appendix 2 287 Filmography of Elizaveta Svilova Bibliography 321 Web Sources and Archive Sources 335 Filmography 337 Declaration of Authorship I, Christopher Penfold, declare that this thesis, Elizaveta Svilova and Soviet Documentary Film, and the work presented in it are my own and have been generated by me as the result of my own original research. I confirm that: 1. This work was done wholly or mainly while in candidature for a research degree at this University; 2. Where any part of this thesis has previously been submitted for a degree or any other qualification at this University or any other institution, this has been clearly stated; 3. Where I have consulted the published work of others, this is always clearly attributed; 4. Where I have quoted from the work of others, the source is always given. With the exception of such quotations, this thesis is entirely my own work; 5. I have acknowledged all main sources of help; 6. Where the thesis is based on work done by myself jointly with others, I have made clear exactly what was done by others and what I have contributed myself; 7. Parts of this work have been published as: Testimony of an Absent Witness, Holocaust Studies 18.3 (2012) Signed: Date: 10 May, 2013 1 2 Acknowledgements I would like to thank my parents for their kind hearts, Tim Bergfelder and David Dunn for their inspired minds, and Christen Ericsson-Penfold for her caring shoulder. I am thankful to the University of Southampton for additional research funds and to the various scholars who have offered invaluable advice on aspects of my thesis at conferences and through peer review. I also wish to express my gratitude to the archivists at the Russian State Documentary Film and Photo Archive in Krasnogorsk, the Russian Archive of Literature and Art in Moscow, and the Open Society Archive in Budapest. 3 4 Notes on Transliteration and Sources Transliteration of Russian is according to the Library of Congress system. Titles in the text are given in English and Russian at first mention (unless no transliteration is necessary), and thereafter in English only. Titles in the notes section and in the filmography are given in English, and titles in Appendix 2 are given in English and Russian. Beyond Svilova’s films and archival documents, I refer mainly to English-language sources. I am aware that there might exist additional non-English language sources, particularly in Russian, that would provide further scope to this thesis, and I encourage future researchers with access to these materials to supplement or challenge my analysis. 5 6 Introduction The focus of my research is Soviet documentary filmmaker, Elizaveta Svilova (1900- 75), most commonly remembered, if at all, as the wife and collaborator of acclaimed Soviet film pioneer, Dziga Vertov (1896-1954). Having worked with her husband for many years, Svilova continued her career as an independent director-editor after Vertov fell out of favour with the Soviet authorities. According to on-screen credits, between 1939 and 1956 Svilova was the director-editor of over 100 documentaries and newsreel episodes, yet this corpus of films has received hardly any critical attention. As my thesis aims to demonstrate, the reasons for the lack of attention to Svilova and her films are partly due to her husband’s eminent status – the rules whereby we construct film history have resulted in Svilova’s contribution to Soviet documentary being absorbed into Vertov’s – and this is related to the long-standing tendency within film criticism to marginalise the female director. Julia Wright has argued that Svilova’s contributions to Vertov’s canon have not been fully acknowledged because she was a woman.1 The third factor that has led to a misunderstanding of Svilova’s contribution is the ambiguity surrounding the role of the director in the Soviet film industry during the period of her career. Directors of documentaries, particularly newsreels, are understood to have made a limited impact on the shaping of their films as they were often absent from the shooting locations 7 and instead ‘directed’ the film at the editing table. I will argue that, for Svilova at least, having control of the editing process compensated for her absence from the shooting location and provided her with opportunities to make a substantial artistic contribution to her films. The last potential cause of Svilova’s marginalisation is of a logistical nature. Archived in the Russian State Documentary Film and Photo Archive in Krasnogorsk (approximately twelve miles west of central Moscow), Svilova’s independent films are not easily accessible in the public domain and require a concerted effort to view. In this respect, my thesis also touches on issues regarding curatorial and archival policies, and how the latter shape our conception of a filmmaker’s contribution to the industry. Beyond issues of access, engaging with Svilova’s body of work is by no means a straightforward task. Throughout the process of identifying her contribution – researching filmographies, archive catalogues and biographical accounts of her life – it is evident that sources do not always correspond with on-screen credits, the latter of which I consider to be the most reliable system of allocating film roles. Often films Svilova co-directed with Vertov, or filmmakers such as Yuli Raizman or Roman Karmen, are listed exclusively as the work of her collaborator. On other occasions, films for which she is credited as director-editor are either attributed to the name of a studio executive or attributed to no name at all. Also, sources that do attempt to acknowledge Svilova’s contribution, particularly to her collaborative films with Vertov, frequently contradict one another. These inconsistencies have resulted in a disjointed and ambiguous picture of Svilova. Characterised by numerous collaborations, various production roles (most notably alongside a film pioneer) and, importantly, by her gender, her contribution to Soviet documentary film has not been fully appreciated. 8 The project of the thesis Chapter One outlines my methodology for identifying Svilova’s contribution to Soviet documentary film through her role as an editor, first as Vertov’s collaborator and then as an independent director-editor. I also outline the context in which Svilova produced her films and the framework in which I am analysing them. By highlighting the contradiction between Marxist ideology and the reality inherited by the Central Committee, and in turn illustrating the policies of defence and legitimisation that emerged as a result of the deficit, I make clear the purpose of Svilova’s films – what she as a state documentary filmmaker was employed to do. Cinema was mobilised to persuade the masses of the righteousness of the regime and their duty to participate in the realisation of Marx’s communist utopia.
Recommended publications
  • Goodbye Cinema, Hello Cinephilia Other Books by Jonathan Rosenbaum
    Goodbye Cinema, Hello Cinephilia Other Books by Jonathan Rosenbaum Rivette: Texts and Interviews (editor, 1977) Orson Welles: A Critical View, by André Bazin (editor and translator, 1978) Moving Places: A Life in the Movies (1980) Film: The Front Line 1983 (1983) Midnight Movies (with J. Hoberman, 1983) Greed (1991) This Is Orson Welles, by Orson Welles and Peter Bogdanovich (editor, 1992) Placing Movies: The Practice of Film Criticism (1995) Movies as Politics (1997) Another Kind of Independence: Joe Dante and the Roger Corman Class of 1970 (coedited with Bill Krohn, 1999) Dead Man (2000) Movie Wars: How Hollywood and the Media Limit What Films We Can See (2000) Abbas Kiarostami (with Mehrmax Saeed-Vafa, 2003) Movie Mutations: The Changing Face of World Cinephilia (coedited with Adrian Martin, 2003) Essential Cinema: On the Necessity of Film Canons (2004) Discovering Orson Welles (2007) The Unquiet American: Trangressive Comedies from the U.S. (2009) Goodbye Cinema, Hello Cinephilia Film Culture in Transition Jonathan Rosenbaum the university of chicago press | chicago and london Jonathan Rosenbaum wrote for many periodicals (including the Village Voice, Sight and Sound, Film Quarterly, and Film Comment) before becoming principal fi lm critic for the Chicago Reader in 1987. Since his retirement from that position in March 2008, he has maintained his own Web site and continued to write for both print and online publications. His many books include four major collections of essays: Placing Movies (California 1995), Movies as Politics (California 1997), Movie Wars (a cappella 2000), and Essential Cinema (Johns Hopkins 2004). The University of Chicago Press, Chicago 60637 The University of Chicago Press, Ltd., London © 2010 by The University of Chicago All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Chef Michael Brown
    EXECUTIVE CHEF M ICHAEL BROWN SOMETHING SEASONAL THE BEST OF THE STATE’S SEASONAL PRODUCE THIS WEEK WE HAVE FO CUSED ON SOUTH AUSTRALIA ’ S FANTASTIC SEAFOOD AND SEASONAL CATCHES . 15 SEARED SCAL LOPS (COFFI N BAY ) SCALLOP ROE EMULSION – SUCCULENTS – FRIED SALT BUSH 28 SMOKE D TOMMY-RUFF RIS OTTO (SPENCER G ULF) BLACK RICE – HOUSE SMOKED TOMMY R U FFS – SCALLOP PUREE – FORAGED MUSHROOMS 34 KING FISH – (ARNO BAY) GINGER PICKLED COLES LAW – FENNEL AND RADISH SH A VINGS – BURNT ORANGE VINAIGRETTE – BEETROOT PUREE SOMETHING SMALL SMALL PLATES TO START – WHEN ONE ISN’T ENOUGH 8 HOUSE MADE LOAF (V ) CHARCOAL SALT – Q UINOA – PE PITAS 18 SEARED SCALLOPS (GF) CORAL EMULSION -CHORIZO CRUMB 15 SMOKED TO MMY RUFF (GF) BLACK RICE RISOTTO - WILD MUSHROOMS 16 PORK BELLY BRIK PASTRY BARK - PICKLED PEAR . 15 GO ATS CHEESE TART (V ) BEETROOT MERINGUE - SUCCULENT SALSA COFFIN B AY OYSTERS (GF) SERVED NATURAL OR GR ILLED - SHALLOT MERLOT 4 EACH 22 ½ DOZEN 42 DOZEN SOMETHING TO SHARE SHARE THE BEST OF THE STATES PRODUCE – TO FEED A HUNGRY COUPLE OR TRIO PORK L OIN – KANGARO O ISLAND (1.2KG) (GF) 75 A WHOLE ROASTED LOIN OF PORK WITH ALL THE TRIMMINGS APPLE & PEAR STUFFING – PARIS M A SH – ROAST BEETROOT – JUS – CRACKLING – CHARGRILLED VEG ETABLES LEG OF LAMB – HAY VALL EY FARMS (1.2KG) (GF) 80 SLOW ROASTED LEG OF LAMB WITH A SELECTIO N OF OUR BEST SIDES SALTBUSH – SMOKED CARROTS – PEA P UREE – DUCK FAT POTATOES SOUTH AUSTR ALI AN SEAFOOD S AMPLER (GF) THE BEST SEAFOOD FRO M AROUND THE STATE 85 COFFIN BAY OYSTERS – KIN G FISH – OCTOPUS – KIPPER S – SCALLOPS
    [Show full text]
  • Bolderboulder 10K Results
    BolderBOULDER 1986 - BolderBOULDER 10K - results OnlineRaceResults.com NAME DIV TIME ---------------------- ------- ----------- Jon Luff M18 31:14 Jeff Sanchez M20 31:23 Jonathan Hume M18 31:58 Ed Ostrovich M27 32:04 Mark Stromberg M21 32:09 Michael Velasquez M16 32:21 Rick Renfrom M32 32:22 James Ysebaert M22 32:24 Louis Anderson M32 32:25 Joel Thompson M27 32:27 Kevin Collins M31 32:34 Rob Welo M22 32:42 Bill Lawrance M31 32:44 Richard Bishop M28 32:45 Chester Carl M33 32:47 Bob Fink M29 32:51 David Couture M18 32:54 Brent Terry M24 32:58 Chris Nelson M16 33:02 Robert III Hillgrove M18 33:05 Steve Smith M16 33:08 Rick Katz M37 33:11 Tom Donohoue M30 33:14 Dale Garland M28 33:17 Michael Tobin M22 33:18 Craig Marshall M28 33:20 Mark Weeks M34 33:21 Sam Wolfe M27 33:23 William Levine M25 33:26 Robert Jr Dominguez M30 33:26 David Teague M32 33:28 Alex Accetta M16 33:29 Dave Dreikosen M32 33:31 Peter Boes M22 33:32 Daniel Bieser M24 33:32 Matt Strand M18 33:33 George Frushour M23 33:34 Everett Bear M16 33:35 Bruce Pulford M31 33:36 Jeff Stein M26 33:40 Thomas Teschner M22 33:42 Mike Chase M28 33:43 Michael Junig M21 33:43 Parrick Carrigan M26 33:44 Jay Kirksey M30 33:46 Todd Moore M22 33:49 Jerry Duckworth M24 33:49 Rick Reimer M37 33:50 RaY Keogh M28 33:50 Dave Dooley M39 33:50 Roger Innes M26 33:50 David Chipman M22 33:51 Brian Boehm M17 33:51 Michael Dunlap M29 33:51 Arthur Mizzi M30 33:52 Jim Tanner M18 33:52 Bob Hillgrove M41 33:52 Ramon Duran M18 33:52 Ken Jr.
    [Show full text]
  • Aleksandra Khokhlova
    Aleksandra Khokhlova Also Known As: Aleksandra Sergeevna Khokhlova, Aleksandra Botkina Lived: November 4, 1897 - August 22, 1985 Worked as: acting teacher, assistant director, co-director, directing teacher, director, film actress, writer Worked In: Russia by Ana Olenina Today Aleksandra Khokhlova is remembered as the star actress in films directed by Lev Kuleshov in the 1920s and 1930s. Indeed, at the peak of her career she was at the epicenter of the Soviet avant-garde, an icon of the experimental acting that matched the style of revolutionary montage cinema. Looking back at his life, Kuleshov wrote: “Nearly all that I have done in film directing, in teaching, and in life is connected to her [Khokhlova] in terms of ideas and art practice” (1946, 162). Yet, Khokhlova was much more than Kuleshov’s wife and muse as in her own right she was a talented author, actress, and film director, an artist in formation long before she met Kuleshov. Growing up in an affluent intellectual family, Aleksandra would have had many inspiring artistic encounters. Her maternal grandfather, the merchant Pavel Tretyakov, founder of the Tretyakov Gallery in Moscow, was a philanthropist and patron who purchased and exhibited masterpieces of Russian Romanticism, Realism, and Symbolism. Aleksandra’s parents’ St. Petersburg home was a prestigious art salon and significant painters, actors, and musicians were family friends. Portraits of Aleksandra as a young girl were painted by such eminent artists as Valentin Serov and Filipp Maliavin. Aleksandra’s father, the doctor Sergei Botkin, an art connoisseur and collector, cultivated ties to the World of Arts circle–the creators of the Ballets Russes.
    [Show full text]
  • 1998 Acquisitions
    1998 Acquisitions PAINTINGS PRINTS Carl Rice Embrey, Shells, 1972. Acrylic on panel, 47 7/8 x 71 7/8 in. Albert Belleroche, Rêverie, 1903. Lithograph, image 13 3/4 x Museum purchase with funds from Charline and Red McCombs, 17 1/4 in. Museum purchase, 1998.5. 1998.3. Henry Caro-Delvaille, Maternité, ca.1905. Lithograph, Ernest Lawson, Harbor in Winter, ca. 1908. Oil on canvas, image 22 x 17 1/4 in. Museum purchase, 1998.6. 24 1/4 x 29 1/2 in. Bequest of Gloria and Dan Oppenheimer, Honoré Daumier, Ne vous y frottez pas (Don’t Meddle With It), 1834. 1998.10. Lithograph, image 13 1/4 x 17 3/4 in. Museum purchase in memory Bill Reily, Variations on a Xuande Bowl, 1959. Oil on canvas, of Alexander J. Oppenheimer, 1998.23. 70 1/2 x 54 in. Gift of Maryanne MacGuarin Leeper in memory of Marsden Hartley, Apples in a Basket, 1923. Lithograph, image Blanche and John Palmer Leeper, 1998.21. 13 1/2 x 18 1/2 in. Museum purchase in memory of Alexander J. Kent Rush, Untitled, 1978. Collage with acrylic, charcoal, and Oppenheimer, 1998.24. graphite on panel, 67 x 48 in. Gift of Jane and Arthur Stieren, Maximilian Kurzweil, Der Polster (The Pillow), ca.1903. 1998.9. Woodcut, image 11 1/4 x 10 1/4 in. Gift of Mr. and Mrs. Frederic J. SCULPTURE Oppenheimer in memory of Alexander J. Oppenheimer, 1998.4. Pierre-Jean David d’Angers, Philopoemen, 1837. Gilded bronze, Louis LeGrand, The End, ca.1887. Two etching and aquatints, 19 in.
    [Show full text]
  • Visualizing the Past: Perestroika Documentary Memory Of
    VISUALIZING THE PAST: PERESTROIKA DOCUMENTARY MEMORY OF STALIN-ERA TRAUMA by Erin Rebecca Alpert B.A. in Global Studies, College of William and Mary, 2007 M.A. in Slavic Languages and Literatures, University of Pittsburgh, 2009 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Kenneth P. Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2014 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Kenneth P. Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences This dissertation was presented by Erin Alpert It was defended on May 12, 2014 and approved by Nancy Condee, Professor, University of Pittsburgh, Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures David Birnbaum, Professor, University of Pittsburgh, Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures Jeremy Hicks, Reader, Queen Mary University of London, Department of Russian Dissertation Advisor: Vladimir Padunov, Associate Professor, University of Pittsburgh, Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures ii Copyright © by Erin Alpert 2014 iii VISUALIZING THE PAST: PERESTROIKA DOCUMENTARY MEMORY OF STALIN-ERA TRAUMA Erin Alpert, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2014 The main goal of this dissertation is to look at how, during perestroika, documentary breaks away from the traditional notions of the genre in order to reexamine and redefine traumatic events from the Stalinist period. The first chapter examines the nuances of three critical terms: “documentary,” “collective memory,” and “cultural trauma.” I then turn to a historical approach, exploring how political culture and technology affected the content, production, and screening of documentaries, first discussing the time leading up to perestroika and then the massive changes during the glasnost era. In the final chapters, I argue that there are three primary approaches the films examined in this project take to understanding the past.
    [Show full text]
  • No List of Political Assets
    Slavistische Beiträge ∙ Band 248 (eBook - Digi20-Retro) Jerry T.Heil No List of Political Assets The Collaboration of Iurii Olesha and Abram Room on "Strogii Iunosha" [A Strict Youth (1936)] Verlag Otto Sagner München ∙ Berlin ∙ Washington D.C. Digitalisiert im Rahmen der Kooperation mit dem DFG-Projekt „Digi20“ der Bayerischen Staatsbibliothek, München. OCR-Bearbeitung und Erstellung des eBooks durch den Verlag Otto Sagner: http://verlag.kubon-sagner.de © bei Verlag Otto Sagner. Eine Verwertung oder Weitergabe der Texte und Abbildungen, insbesondere durch Vervielfältigung, ist ohne vorherige schriftliche Genehmigung des Verlages unzulässig. «Verlag Otto Sagner» ist ein Imprint der Kubon & Sagner GmbH. Jerry T. Heil - 9783954791941 Downloaded from PubFactory at 01/10/2019 03:46:41AM via free access 00050392 Sl a v is t ic h e B eiträge BEGRÜNDET VON ALOIS SCHMAUS HERAUSGEGEBEN VON HEINRICH KUNSTMANN PETER REHDER JOSEF SCHRENK REDAKTION PETER REHDER Band 248 VERLAG OTTO SAGNER MÜNCHEN Jerry T. Heil - 9783954791941 Downloaded from PubFactory at 01/10/2019 03:46:41AM via free access 00050392 JERRY T. HEIL NO LIST OF POLITICAL ASSETS: The Collaboration of lurii Olesha and Abram Room “ Strogii lunosha” [A Strict Youth (1936)] VERLAG OTTO SAGNER • MÜNCHEN 1989 Jerry T. Heil - 9783954791941 Downloaded from PubFactory at 01/10/2019 03:46:41AM via free access ISBN 3-87690-449-8 © Verlag Otto Sagner, München 1989 Abteilung der Firma Kubon & Sagner, München Jerry T. Heil - 9783954791941 Downloaded from PubFactory at 01/10/2019 03:46:41AM via free access Acknowledgments The research that led to this essay (and others) was made possible by a grmt from the International Research and Exchanges Board (IREX)f Princeton, New Jersey, an agency partially funded by the United States' N a tia ia l Endowment fo r the H um anities, W ashington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Short Synopsis a Young Woman Is
    *** Please note: these production notes are for reference only and may contain spoilers. We would appreciate you not revealing the characters’ secrets in editorial or social postings without proper warning. The film is under embargo until Wednesday, February 21 at 10:30pm CET / 4:30pm EST / 1:30pm PST. Thank you. *** Short Synopsis A young woman is involuntarily committed to a mental institution where she is confronted by her greatest fear - but is it real or is it a product of her delusion? Long Synopsis Making a startling trip into thriller territory with Unsane, director Steven Soderbergh plunges audiences into the suspense and drama of a resilient woman’s (Claire Foy, The Crown) fight to reclaim her freedom even as she risks her own sanity. Scarred from the trauma of being stalked, quick-witted Sawyer Valentini (portrayed by Ms. Foy) has relocated from Boston to Pennsylvania for a new life. As her mother Angela (Academy Award nominee Amy Irving) misses her back home and her office job is hardly an ideal employment opportunity, Sawyer remains on edge following her two years of being terrorized. To consult with a therapist, she goes for follow-up treatment at the Highland Creek Behavioral Center. Sawyer’s initial therapy session at the suburban complex run by clinician Ashley Brighterhouse (Aimée Mullins, Stranger Things) progresses well — until she unwittingly signs herself in for voluntary 24-hour commitment. Unable to leave the premises, Sawyer finds herself in close quarters with previously committed hellion Violet (Juno Temple, The Dark Knight Rises) and savvy Nate (Jay Pharoah, Saturday Night Live), who is battling an opioid addiction.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Slovak Audiovisual Situation in 2007 Report on the Slovak Audiovisual Situation in 2007
    REPORT ON THE SLOVAK AUDIOVISUAL SITUATION IN 2007 REPORT ON THE SLOVAK AUDIOVISUAL SITUATION IN 2007 ➜ CONTENT ■ Introduction ........................................................................................... 3 ■ Legislation ............................................................................................. 4 ■ Film Education ........................................................................................ 6 ■ Film Production ...................................................................................... 8 ■ State Audiovisual Support ....................................................................... 9 ■ MEDIA .................................................................................................. 11 ■ Eurimages ............................................................................................ 13 ■ Film Distribution .................................................................................... 14 ■ Videodistribution .................................................................................... 17 ■ Cinemas..................................................................................................19 ■ Film Clubs .............................................................................................. 20 ■ National Festivals, Reviews and Awards ................................................... 22 ■ Awards of Slovak Films and Filmmakers Abroad ........................................ 26 ■ Slovak Film Institute ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Representation of Suicide in the Cinema
    The Representation of Suicide in the Cinema John Saddington Submitted for the degree of PhD University of York Department of Sociology September 2010 Abstract This study examines representations of suicide in film. Based upon original research cataloguing 350 films it considers the ways in which suicide is portrayed and considers this in relation to gender conventions and cinematic traditions. The thesis is split into two sections, one which considers wider themes relating to suicide and film and a second which considers a number of exemplary films. Part I discusses the wider literature associated with scholarly approaches to the study of both suicide and gender. This is followed by quantitative analysis of the representation of suicide in films, allowing important trends to be identified, especially in relation to gender, changes over time and the method of suicide. In Part II, themes identified within the literature review and the data are explored further in relation to detailed exemplary film analyses. Six films have been chosen: Le Feu Fol/et (1963), Leaving Las Vegas (1995), The Killers (1946 and 1964), The Hustler (1961) and The Virgin Suicides (1999). These films are considered in three chapters which exemplify different ways that suicide is constructed. Chapters 4 and 5 explore the two categories that I have developed to differentiate the reasons why film characters commit suicide. These are Melancholic Suicide, which focuses on a fundamentally "internal" and often iII­ understood motivation, for example depression or long term illness; and Occasioned Suicide, where there is an "external" motivation for which the narrative provides apparently intelligible explanations, for instance where a character is seen to be in danger or to be suffering from feelings of guilt.
    [Show full text]
  • Visual Metaphors for the People a Study of Cinematic Propoganda in Sergei Eisenstein’S Film
    VIsual Metaphors for the people A Study of Cinematic Propoganda in Sergei Eisenstein’s Film ashley brown This paper attempTs To undersTand how The celebraTed and conTroversial figure of sergei eisensTein undersTood and conTribuTed To The formaTion of The sovieT union Through his films of The 1920s. The lens of visual meTaphors offer a specific insighT inTo how arTisTic choices of The direcTor were informed by his own pedagogy for The russian revoluTion. The paper asks The quesTions: did eisensTein’s films reflecT The official parTy rheToric? how did They inform or moTivaTe The public Toward The communisT ideology of The early sovieT union? The primary sources used in This pa- per are from The films Strike (1925), BattleShip potemkin (1926), octoBer (1928), and the General line (1929). eisensTein creaTed visual meTaphors Through The juxTaposi- Tion of images in his films which alluded To higher concepTs. a shoT of a worker followed by The shoT of gears Turning creaTed The concepT of indusTry in The minds of The audience. Through visual meTaphors, iT is possible To undersTand The moTives of eisensTein and The communisT parTy. iT is also possible, wiTh The aid of secondary sources, To see how Those moTives differed. “Language is much closer to film than painting is. For example, aimed at the “... organization of the psychology of the in painting the form arises from abstract elements of line and masses.”6 Works about Eisenstein in the field of film color, while in cinema the material concreteness of the image theory examine Eisenstein’s career in theater, the evolution within the frame presents—as an element—the greatest of his approach to montage, and his artistic expression.7 difficulty in manipulation.
    [Show full text]
  • Art and Technology Between the Usa and the Ussr, 1926 to 1933
    THE AMERIKA MACHINE: ART AND TECHNOLOGY BETWEEN THE USA AND THE USSR, 1926 TO 1933. BARNABY EMMETT HARAN PHD THESIS 2008 DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY OF ART UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON SUPERVISOR: PROFESSOR ANDREW HEMINGWAY UMI Number: U591491 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U591491 Published by ProQuest LLC 2013. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 I, Bamaby Emmett Haran, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. 3 ABSTRACT This thesis concerns the meeting of art and technology in the cultural arena of the American avant-garde during the late 1920s and early 1930s. It assesses the impact of Russian technological Modernism, especially Constructivism, in the United States, chiefly in New York where it was disseminated, mimicked, and redefined. It is based on the paradox that Americans travelling to Europe and Russia on cultural pilgrimages to escape America were greeted with ‘Amerikanismus’ and ‘Amerikanizm’, where America represented the vanguard of technological modernity.
    [Show full text]