Partial Differential Equations

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Partial Differential Equations Partial Differential Equations William G. Faris May 17, 1999 Contents 1 The Laplace equation 5 1.1 Gradient and divergence . 5 1.2 Equilibrium conservation laws . 6 1.3 Polar coordinates . 7 1.4 The mean value property . 8 1.5 Approximate delta functions . 10 1.6 Regularity . 12 1.7 Liouville's theorem . 12 1.8 The maximum principle . 13 1.9 Differentiating an integral . 14 1.10 The fundamental solution . 15 1.11 Energy . 17 2 The heat equation 19 2.1 Conservation laws . 19 2.2 The fundamental solution . 20 2.3 Approach to equilibrium . 21 2.4 The mean value property . 23 2.5 The maximum principle . 25 3 The wave equation 27 3.1 Mechanical conservation laws . 27 3.2 The d'Alembert solution . 29 3.3 The Kirchoff solution . 30 3.4 The method of descent . 33 3.5 Solution in odd dimension . 33 3.6 Conservation of energy . 35 4 Hamilton-Jacobi equation 37 4.1 Characteristics . 37 4.2 Hamiltonian-Jacobi equations . 39 4.3 The Hopf-Lax solution . 41 4.4 Weak solutions . 43 1 4.5 The Hopf-Cole transformation for the quadratic Hamilton-Jacobi equation . 45 4.6 Laplace's method . 46 5 Conservation laws 48 5.1 Scalar conservation laws . 48 5.2 Conservation in one space dimension . 49 5.3 The Lax-Oleinik solution . 49 5.4 Distributions . 50 5.5 Weak solutions . 52 5.6 Entropy . 54 5.7 Entropy increase . 55 5.8 The Hopf-Cole transformation for the Burgers equation . 57 6 The Fourier transform 59 6.1 L1 theory . 59 6.2 The Plancherel theorem and L2 theory . 62 6.3 L2 derivatives . 64 6.4 The Poisson equation . 65 6.5 The heat equation . 67 6.6 The Schr¨odingerequation . 67 6.7 Hyperbolic equations . 69 6.8 L2 Sobolev inequalities . 71 7 The Dirichlet Laplacian 73 7.1 Sobolev spaces for open subsets . 73 7.2 The Laplacian with dissipation . 73 7.3 Dirichlet's principle and the Riesz representation theorem . 74 7.4 Finite elements . 76 7.5 Equivalent norms on the Sobolev space . 76 7.6 The Laplacian without dissipation . 78 7.7 Positive elliptic operators . 79 8 Sobolev inequalities 80 8.1 Lp spaces . 80 8.2 Convolution and Lp ......................... 84 8.3 Sobolev spaces . 85 8.4 Dirichlet boundary conditions . 86 8.5 The Gagliardo-Nirenberg-Sobolev inequality . 87 8.6 The Poincar´einequality . 89 9 Spectral theory and evolution equations: Discrete spectrum 90 9.1 Separation of variables . 90 9.2 Spectral theorem for compact self-adjoint operators . 92 9.3 Hilbert-Schmidt operators . 95 9.4 Compact embedding of Hilbert spaces . 96 2 9.5 Positive quadratic forms . 97 9.6 Evolution equations . 99 10 Spectral theory and evolution equations: Continuous spectrum101 10.1 Separation of variables . 101 10.2 Continuity lemma for bounded self-adjoint operators . 103 10.3 Spectral theorem for bounded self-adjoint operators . 105 10.4 Positive quadratic forms . 108 10.5 Evolution equations . 109 10.6 The role of the Fourier transform . 111 11 Energy and equilibrium 112 11.1 Least squares solutions . 112 11.2 Bilinear forms . 113 11.3 Equilibrium . 115 11.4 Boundedness and compactness . 116 12 Semigroup theory and evolution equations 118 12.1 Exponentials . 118 12.2 Dissipative operators . 119 12.3 The Hille-Yosida theorem . 120 13 Compactness 124 13.1 Total boundedness . 124 13.2 Compactness . 125 13.3 The Ascoli-Arzel`atotal boundedness theorem . 126 13.4 The Rellich-Kondrachov embedding theorem . 127 13.5 Almost uniform convergence . 129 14 Weak ∗ compactness 131 14.1 Weak ∗ compactness in the standard Banach spaces . 131 14.2 Compactness and minimization . 132 14.3 The lower topology . 133 14.4 Comparison of topologies . 134 14.5 Weak ∗ topology . 135 14.6 Metrizability . 137 14.7 Convexity . 138 15 Variational methods for nonlinear problems 140 15.1 The Euler-Lagrange equation . 140 15.2 Coercivity . 141 15.3 The weak ∗ topology on the Sobolev space . 142 15.4 Convex functionals with a derivative bound . 143 15.5 Convex functionals . 143 15.6 Functionals convex in the gradient . 144 15.7 Functionals without convexity . 145 3 16 Fixed points 148 16.1 Banach's fixed point theorem . 148 16.2 The Schauder-Leray fixed point theorem . 148 16.3 Semilinear elliptic PDE . 150 4 Chapter 1 The Laplace equation 1.1 Gradient and divergence In these lectures we follow the notation suggested by Evans. If u is a scalar function, then Du is the gradient, the vector of partial derivatives. If J is a vector function, then DJ is the matrix of partial derivatives of the components of J. The trace of this matrix is div J = tr(DJ), the divergence of the vector field. (Similarly, the determinant of this matrix is the Jacobian.) The matrix of second derivatives of u is D2u, the Hessian matrix. This is a symmetric matrix. The trace of the Hessian matrix is the Laplacian: ∆u = tr(D2u) = div Du: (1.1) We recall some basic calculus ideas. Let J be a vector field with divergence div J. The divergence theorem says that for bounded open sets V with smooth boundary @V we have Z Z div J dy = J · ν dS; (1.2) V @V where ν is the unit normal vector pointing outward, and dS is the surface measure. Let s be a scalar function with gradient Ds. Then we have the product rule for differentiating in the form div(sJ) = Ds · J + s div J: (1.3) If we apply the divergence theorem to the left hand side of this equation, we get the fundamental integration by parts result: Z Z Z Ds · J dy + s div J dy = sJ · ν dS: (1.4) V V @V This will be used over and over again. 5 1.2 Equilibrium conservation laws We begin with the most classical of partial differential equations, the Laplace equation. This equation is linear of second order, and is both translation and rotation invariant. It describes equilibrium in space. We will see in this first chapter that even though the equation only involves second derivatives, every solution automatically has all derivatives. Now we proceed to the derivation of the Poisson and Laplace equations. Let J be a vector field on an open subset U of Rn. This is the current. Let f be a function on U. This is the source (the rate of production of some quantity). An equilibrium conservation law is an equation of the form Z Z J · ν dS = f dx: (1.5) @V V Here V is supposed to range over suitable bounded open subsets of U. The boundary @V of each V is supposed to be a smooth subset of U. This equation says that the amount of substance flowing out of the region V is equal to the rate of production. If we apply the divergence theorem, we obtain Z Z div J dx = f dx: (1.6) V V Since this is assumed to hold for all subregions V , we have the differential form of the equilibrium conservation law: div J = f: (1.7) Now assume that the current is proportional to the negative of the gradient of some scalar function u defined on U. Thus J = −Du: (1.8) We get the Poisson equation −4u = − div Du = f: (1.9) When there is equilibrium with no source, then this is the Laplace equation 4u = 0: (1.10) Even if one is interested in the Poisson equation, the Laplace equation is impor- tant, since the difference of two solutions of the Poisson equation is a solution of the Laplace equation. In the following we will usually think of the Poisson or Laplace equation being satisfied for a function u that is C2 on some open set U. In applications u could be temperature, density, or electric potential. The corresponding current J would be heat flux, diffusive current, or electric field. 6 The source f could be a source of heat, a source of diffusing particles, or an electric charge density. If the Laplace equation is satisfied in U, then we have Z J · ν dS = 0 (1.11) @V for every suitable subregion V of U. This says that there is no net flow into or out of the region V . 1.3 Polar coordinates It will sometime be convenient to calculate integrals in polar coordinates. Thus Z Z 1 Z f(x) dx = f(x) dSdr: (1.12) n R 0 @B(x0;r) Here dS represents surface measure on the n−1 dimensional sphere @B(x0; r) of radius r centered at x0. The total surface measure of the sphere is proportional to rn−1 and the proportionality constant will be taken so that it is by definition nα(n)rn−1. Thus, for example, nα(n) in dimensions n = 1; 2; 3 has the values 2, 2π, and 4π. In dimensions n = 1; 2; 3 these numbers represent the count of two points, the length of a unit circle, and the area of a unit sphere. 2 As an example, we can take f(x) = exp(−x ) and x0 = 0. Then Z Z 1 exp(−x2) dx = nα(n) exp(−r2)rn−1 dr: (1.13) 0 Here the total surface measure of the ball is defined to be nα(n)rn−1. We can also.
Recommended publications
  • Analytic Solutions of Partial Differential Equations
    Analytic Solutions of Partial Differential Equations MATH3414 School of Mathematics, University of Leeds 15 credits • Taught Semester 1, • Year running 2003/04 • Pre-requisites MATH2360 or MATH2420 or equivalent. • Co-requisites None. • Objectives: To provide an understanding of, and methods of solution for, the most important • types of partial differential equations that arise in Mathematical Physics. On completion of this module, students should be able to: a) use the method of characteristics to solve first-order hyperbolic equations; b) classify a second order PDE as elliptic, parabolic or hyperbolic; c) use Green's functions to solve elliptic equations; d) have a basic understanding of diffusion; e) obtain a priori bounds for reaction-diffusion equations. Syllabus: The majority of physical phenomena can be described by partial differential equa- • tions (e.g. the Navier-Stokes equation of fluid dynamics, Maxwell's equations of electro- magnetism). This module considers the properties of, and analytical methods of solution for some of the most common first and second order PDEs of Mathematical Physics. In particu- lar, we shall look in detail at elliptic equations (Laplace?s equation), describing steady-state phenomena and the diffusion / heat conduction equation describing the slow spread of con- centration or heat. The topics covered are: First order PDEs. Semilinear and quasilinear PDEs; method of characteristics. Characteristics crossing. Second order PDEs. Classifi- cation and standard forms. Elliptic equations: weak and strong minimum and maximum principles; Green's functions. Parabolic equations: exemplified by solutions of the diffusion equation. Bounds on solutions of reaction-diffusion equations. Form of teaching • Lectures: 26 hours. 7 examples classes.
    [Show full text]
  • Parametrix Construction of the Transition Probability Density of the Solution to an SDE Driven by $\Alpha $-Stable Noise
    Parametrix construction of the transition probability density of the solution to an SDE driven by α-stable noise Victoria Knopova∗ and Alexei Kulik∗∗ Abstract Let L := −a(x)(−∆)α/2 + (b(x), ∇), where α ∈ (0, 2), and a : Rd → (0, ∞), b : Rd → Rd. Under certain regularity assumptions on the coefficients a and b, we associate Rd 2 Rd with the C∞( )-closure of (L,C∞( )) a Feller Markov process X, which possesses a transition probability density pt(x,y). To construct this transition probability density and to obtain the two-sided estimates on it, we develop a new version of the parametrix method, which even allows us to handle the case 0 < α ≤ 1 and b 6= 0, i.e. when the gradient part of the generator is not dominated by the jump part. Keywords: Pseudo-differential operator, generator of a Markov process, transition prob- ability density, martingale problem, SDE, Levi’s parametrix method. MSC 2010: Primary: 60J35. Secondary: 60J75, 35S05, 35S10, 47G30. 1 Introduction Let Z(α), α ∈ (0, 2), be a symmetric α-stable process in Rd; that is, a Lévy process with the characteristic function (α) α Eei(ξ,Zt ) = e−t|ξ| , ξ ∈ Rd. (α) (α) It is well known that the generator L of the semigroup (Pt )t≥0, where (α) x (α) arXiv:1412.8732v3 [math.PR] 27 Nov 2017 E Pt f(x)= f(Zt ), 2 Rd admits on C∞( ) the representation (α) cα L f(x)= P.V. f(x + u) − f(x) d+α du. (1.1) Rd |u| Z ∗V.M.
    [Show full text]
  • Partial Differential Equations
    PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS SERGIU KLAINERMAN 1. Basic definitions and examples To start with partial differential equations, just like ordinary differential or integral equations, are functional equations. That means that the unknown, or unknowns, we are trying to determine are functions. In the case of partial differential equa- tions (PDE) these functions are to be determined from equations which involve, in addition to the usual operations of addition and multiplication, partial derivatives of the functions. The simplest example, which has already been described in section 1 of this compendium, is the Laplace equation in R3, ∆u = 0 (1) ∂2 ∂2 ∂2 where ∆u = ∂x2 u + ∂y2 u + ∂z2 u. The other two examples described in the section of fundamental mathematical definitions are the heat equation, with k = 1, − ∂tu + ∆u = 0, (2) and the wave equation with k = 1, 2 − ∂t u + ∆u = 0. (3) In these last two cases one is asked to find a function u, depending on the variables t, x, y, z, which verifies the corresponding equations. Observe that both (2) and (3) involve the symbol ∆ which has the same meaning as in the first equation, that is ∂2 ∂2 ∂2 ∂2 ∂2 ∂2 ∆u = ( ∂x2 + ∂y2 + ∂z2 )u = ∂x2 u+ ∂y2 u+ ∂z2 u. Both equations are called evolution equations, simply because they are supposed to describe the change relative to the time parameter t of a particular physical object. Observe that (1) can be interpreted as a particular case of both (3) and (2). Indeed solutions u = u(t, x, y, z) of either (3) or (2) which are independent of t, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Fundamental Solution in Potential and Regularity Theory for Subelliptic PDE
    The role of fundamental solution in Potential and Regularity Theory for subelliptic PDE Andrea Bonfiglioli, Giovanna Citti, Giovanni Cupini, Maria Manfredini, Annamaria Montanari, Daniele Morbidelli, Andrea Pascucci, Sergio Polidoro, Francesco Uguzzoni tu se’ lo mio maestro e ’l mio autore tu se’ solo colui da cu’ io tolsi lo bello stilo che m’ha fatto onore. Dante Alighieri Abstract In this survey we consider a general Hormander¨ type operator, represented as a sum of squares of vector fields plus a drift and we outline the central role of the fundamental solution in developing Potential and Regularity Theory for solu- tions of related PDEs. After recalling the Gaussian behavior at infinity of the kernel, we show some mean value formulas on the level sets of the fundamental solution, which are the starting point to obtain a comprehensive parallel of the classical Po- tential Theory. Then we show that a precise knowledge of the fundamental solution leads to global regularity results, namely estimates at the boundary or on the whole space. Finally in the regularity problem of non linear differential equations we use an ad hoc modification of the parametrix method, based on the properties of the fundamental solution of an approximating problem. Andrea Bonfiglioli, Giovanna Citti, Giovanni Cupini, Maria Manfredini, Annamaria Montanari, Daniele Morbidelli, Andrea Pascucci, Sergio Polidoro, Francesco Uguzzoni Dipartimento di Matematica, Universita` di Bologna, e-mail: andrea.bonfiglioli6@ unibo.it,[email protected],[email protected],
    [Show full text]
  • Fundamental Solutions for Hermite and Subelliptic Operators
    FUNDAMENTAL SOLUTIONS FOR HERMITE AND SUBELLIPTIC OPERATORS £ By OVIDIU CALIN,DER-CHEN CHANG AND JINGZHI TIE Abstract. In this article, we introduce a geometric method based on multi- pliers to compute heat kernels for operators with potentials. Using the heat kernel, we compute the fundamental solution for the Hermite operator with singularity at an arbitrary point on Euclidean space and on Heisenberg groups. As a conse- £ quence, we obtain the fundamental solutions for the sub-Laplacian  in a family of quadratic submanifolds. 1 Introduction À The Hermite operator « arises in many contexts and has been studied by mathematicians and physicists for quite some time (see e.g., [1], [4], [17] and À [22]). In this paper, we study the fundamental solution of the operator « , where Ò ¾ ¾ ¾ À « · Ü « ¾ Ü ½ Ò Ê Ã ´Ü Ý µ in , i.e., we seek a distribution « such that ¾ ¿ Ò ¾ ¾ ¾ « · à ´Ü Ý µÆ ´Ü Ý µ Ü (1) « ¾ Ü ½ À Since the operator « is not left invariant under the Euclidean group action, we have to compute the fundamental solution with singularity at any point Ý . One way to À achieve this goal is to use the eigenfunction expansion for the operator « (see [4] and [14]). Here we adopt a different approach. First, we use the Hamilton-Jacobi theory to find the heat kernel for the heat equation with potentials. The idea is to write down the Hamilton system of equations and study the system qualitatively £ The research is partially supported by a William Fulbright Research Grant and a Competitive Research Grant at Georgetown University.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Heat Equation
    2 Heat Equation 2.1 Derivation Ref: Strauss, Section 1.3. Below we provide two derivations of the heat equation, ut ¡ kuxx = 0 k > 0: (2.1) This equation is also known as the diffusion equation. 2.1.1 Diffusion Consider a liquid in which a dye is being diffused through the liquid. The dye will move from higher concentration to lower concentration. Let u(x; t) be the concentration (mass per unit length) of the dye at position x in the pipe at time t. The total mass of dye in the pipe from x0 to x1 at time t is given by Z x1 M(t) = u(x; t) dx: x0 Therefore, Z dM x1 = ut(x; t) dx: dt x0 By Fick’s Law, dM = flow in ¡ flow out = ku (x ; t) ¡ ku (x ; t); dt x 1 x 0 where k > 0 is a proportionality constant. That is, the flow rate is proportional to the concentration gradient. Therefore, Z x1 ut(x; t) dx = kux(x1; t) ¡ kux(x0; t): x0 Now differentiating with respect to x1, we have ut(x1; t) = kuxx(x1; t): Or, ut = kuxx: This is known as the diffusion equation. 2.1.2 Heat Flow We now give an alternate derivation of (2.1) from the study of heat flow. Let D be a region n T n in R . Let x = [x1; : : : ; xn] be a vector in R . Let u(x; t) be the temperature at point x, 1 time t, and let H(t) be the total amount of heat (in calories) contained in D.
    [Show full text]
  • On Some New Properties of the Fundamental Solution to the Multi-Dimensional Space- and Time-Fractional Diffusion-Wave Equation
    mathematics Article On Some New Properties of the Fundamental Solution to the Multi-Dimensional Space- and Time-Fractional Diffusion-Wave Equation Yuri Luchko † Beuth University of Applied Sciences Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; [email protected]; Tel.: +49-30-4504-5295 † Current address: Beuth Hochschule für Technik Berlin, Fachbereich II Mathematik-Physik-Chemie, Luxemburger Str. 10, 13353 Berlin, Germany. Received: 11 November 2017; Accepted: 4 December 2017; Published: 8 December 2017 Abstract: In this paper, some new properties of the fundamental solution to the multi-dimensional space- and time-fractional diffusion-wave equation are deduced. We start with the Mellin-Barnes representation of the fundamental solution that was derived in the previous publications of the author. The Mellin-Barnes integral is used to obtain two new representations of the fundamental solution in the form of the Mellin convolution of the special functions of the Wright type. Moreover, some new closed-form formulas for particular cases of the fundamental solution are derived. In particular, we solve the open problem of the representation of the fundamental solution to the two-dimensional neutral-fractional diffusion-wave equation in terms of the known special functions. Keywords: multi-dimensional diffusion-wave equation; neutral-fractional diffusion-wave equation; fundamental solution; Mellin-Barnes integral; integral representation; Wright function; generalized Wright function MSC: 26A33; 35C05; 35E05; 35L05; 45K05; 60E99 1. Introduction Partial fractional differential equations are nowadays both an important research subject and a popular modeling approach. Despite of importance of mathematical models in two- and three-dimensions for applications, most of the recent publications devoted to fractional diffusion-wave equations have dealt with the one-dimensional case.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage and Early History of the Boundary Element Method
    Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements 29 (2005) 268–302 www.elsevier.com/locate/enganabound Heritage and early history of the boundary element method Alexander H.-D. Chenga,*, Daisy T. Chengb aDepartment of Civil Engineering University of Mississippi, University, MS, 38677, USA bJohn D. Williams Library, University of Mississippi, University, MS 38677, USA Received 10 December 2003; revised 7 December 2004; accepted 8 December 2004 Available online 12 February 2005 Abstract This article explores the rich heritage of the boundary element method (BEM) by examining its mathematical foundation from the potential theory, boundary value problems, Green’s functions, Green’s identities, to Fredholm integral equations. The 18th to 20th century mathematicians, whose contributions were key to the theoretical development, are honored with short biographies. The origin of the numerical implementation of boundary integral equations can be traced to the 1960s, when the electronic computers had become available. The full emergence of the numerical technique known as the boundary element method occurred in the late 1970s. This article reviews the early history of the boundary element method up to the late 1970s. q 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Keywords: Boundary element method; Green’s functions; Green’s identities; Boundary integral equation method; Integral equation; History 1. Introduction industrial settings, mesh preparation is the most labor intensive and the most costly portion in numerical After three decades of development, the boundary modeling, particularly for the FEM [9] Without the need element method (BEM) has found a firm footing in the of dealing with the interior mesh, the BEM is more cost arena of numerical methods for partial differential effective in mesh preparation.
    [Show full text]
  • Partial Differential Equations
    PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS Math 124A { Fall 2010 «Viktor Grigoryan [email protected] Department of Mathematics University of California, Santa Barbara These lecture notes arose from the course \Partial Differential Equations" { Math 124A taught by the author in the Department of Mathematics at UCSB in the fall quarters of 2009 and 2010. The selection of topics and the order in which they are introduced is based on [Str]. Most of the problems appearing in this text are also borrowed from Strauss. A list of other references that were consulted while teaching this course appears in the bibliography at the end. These notes are copylefted, and may be freely used for noncommercial educational purposes. I will appreciate any and all feedback directed to the e-mail address listed above. The most up-to date version of these notes can be downloaded from the URL given below. Version 0.1 - December 2010 http://www.math.ucsb.edu/~grigoryan/124A.pdf Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Classification of PDEs . 1 1.2 Examples . 2 1.3 Conclusion . 3 Problem Set 1 4 2 First-order linear equations 5 2.1 The method of characteristics . 6 2.2 General constant coefficient equations . 7 2.3 Variable coefficient equations . 8 2.4 Conclusion . 10 3 Method of characteristics revisited 11 3.1 Transport equation . 11 3.2 Quasilinear equations . 12 3.3 Rarefaction . 13 3.4 Shock waves . 14 3.5 Conclusion . 14 Problem Set 2 15 4 Vibrations and heat flow 16 4.1 Vibrating string . 16 4.2 Vibrating drumhead . 17 4.3 Heat flow .
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution Theory and Fundamental Solutions of Differential Operators
    Final Degree Dissertation Degree in Mathematics Distribution Theory and Fundamental Solutions of Differential Operators Author: Daniel Eceizabarrena Pérez Supervisor: Javier Duoandikoetxea Zuazo Leioa, June 24th 2015 Contents Contentsi Introductioni 1 Distributions1 1.1 The space D of testing functions .................... 1 1.2 The space D0 of distributions ...................... 3 1.2.1 Definition............................. 3 1.2.2 Examples............................. 4 1.2.3 Convergence ........................... 8 1.2.4 Operations on distributions................... 8 1.2.5 Differentiation of distributions ................. 10 2 Tempered Distributions 15 2.1 The Schwartz space S .......................... 15 2.2 The space S0 of tempered distributions................. 20 2.2.1 Definition and some basic properties.............. 20 2.2.2 Examples............................. 22 2.2.3 Basic operations on tempered distributions .......... 24 2.2.4 Convolution............................ 26 2.2.5 Direct product .......................... 29 3 The Fourier Transform 33 3.1 The Fourier transform in L1 ....................... 33 3.2 The Fourier transform in S ....................... 34 3.2.1 Some properties of the Fourier transform in S . 34 3.2.2 The Fourier transform of the Gaussian function . 37 3.2.3 The inverse Fourier transform in S . 39 3.2.4 More properties.......................... 42 3.3 The Fourier transform in S0 ....................... 43 3.3.1 Definition and properties .................... 43 3.3.2 Examples............................. 46 4 Fundamental Solutions of Differential Operators 49 4.1 Generalised and fundamental solutions................. 49 i ii CONTENTS 4.2 Three fundamental solutions....................... 52 4.2.1 Fundamental solution of the heat operator........... 52 4.2.2 Fundamental solution of the Laplace operator......... 54 4.2.3 Fundamental solution of the Cauchy-Riemann operator .
    [Show full text]
  • A Probabilistic Interpretation of the Parametrix Method
    The Annals of Applied Probability 2015, Vol. 25, No. 6, 3095–3138 DOI: 10.1214/14-AAP1068 c Institute of Mathematical Statistics, 2015 A PROBABILISTIC INTERPRETATION OF THE PARAMETRIX METHOD1 By Vlad Bally and Arturo Kohatsu-Higa Universit´eParis-Est Marne-la-Vall´ee and INRIA, and Ritsumeikan University and Japan Science and Technology Agency In this article, we introduce the parametrix technique in order to construct fundamental solutions as a general method based on semigroups and their generators. This leads to a probabilistic inter- pretation of the parametrix method that is amenable to Monte Carlo simulation. We consider the explicit examples of continuous diffu- sions and jump driven stochastic differential equations with H¨older continuous coefficients. 1. Introduction. The parametrix technique for solving parabolic partial differential equations (PDEs) is a classical method in order to expand the fundamental solution of such an equation in terms of a basic function known as the parametrix. This is the parallel of the Taylor expansion of a smooth function in terms of polynomials. The concept of order of the polynomial in the classical Taylor expansion is replaced by multiple integrals whose order increases as the expansion becomes more accurate. This method has been successfully applied to many equations and various situations. Its success is due to its flexibility as it can be applied to a wide variety of PDEs. It has been successfully extended to other situations for theoretical goals (see, e.g., [9–12] and [14]). In [6], the authors consider the parametrix as an analytical method for approximations for continuous diffusions.
    [Show full text]
  • Partial Differential Equations: Graduate Level Problems
    Partial Differential Equations: Graduate Level Problems and Solutions Igor Yanovsky 1 Partial Differential Equations Igor Yanovsky, 2005 2 Disclaimer: This handbook is intended to assist graduate students with qualifying examination preparation. Please be aware, however, that the handbook might contain, and almost certainly contains, typos as well as incorrect or inaccurate solutions. I can not be made responsible for any inaccuracies contained in this handbook. Partial Differential Equations Igor Yanovsky, 2005 3 Contents 1 Trigonometric Identities 6 2 Simple Eigenvalue Problem 8 3 Separation of Variables: Quick Guide 9 4 Eigenvalues of the Laplacian: Quick Guide 9 5First-OrderEquations 10 5.1 Quasilinear Equations . 10 5.2 Weak Solutions for Quasilinear Equations . 12 5.2.1 Conservation Laws and Jump Conditions . 12 5.2.2 FansandRarefactionWaves..................... 12 5.3GeneralNonlinearEquations........................ 13 5.3.1 TwoSpatialDimensions....................... 13 5.3.2 ThreeSpatialDimensions...................... 13 6 Second-Order Equations 14 6.1ClassificationbyCharacteristics....................... 14 6.2CanonicalFormsandGeneralSolutions.................. 14 6.3Well-Posedness................................ 19 7WaveEquation 23 7.1TheInitialValueProblem.......................... 23 7.2WeakSolutions................................ 24 7.3 Initial/Boundary Value Problem . 24 7.4Duhamel’sPrinciple............................. 24 7.5TheNonhomogeneousEquation....................... 24 7.6HigherDimensions.............................
    [Show full text]