DOCSLIB.ORG

Partial Differential Equations: Graduate Level Problems

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Partial Differential Equations: Graduate Level Problems and Solutions Igor Yanovsky 1 Partial Differential Equations Igor Yanovsky, 2005 2 Disclaimer: This handbook is intended to assist graduate students with qualifying examination preparation. Please be aware, however, that the handbook might contain, and almost certainly contains, typos as well as incorrect or inaccurate solutions. I can not be made responsible for any inaccuracies contained in this handbook. Partial Differential Equations Igor Yanovsky, 2005 3 Contents 1 Trigonometric Identities 6 2 Simple Eigenvalue Problem 8 3 Separation of Variables: Quick Guide 9 4 Eigenvalues of the Laplacian: Quick Guide 9 5First-OrderEquations 10 5.1 Quasilinear Equations . 10 5.2 Weak Solutions for Quasilinear Equations . 12 5.2.1 Conservation Laws and Jump Conditions . 12 5.2.2 FansandRarefactionWaves..................... 12 5.3GeneralNonlinearEquations........................ 13 5.3.1 TwoSpatialDimensions....................... 13 5.3.2 ThreeSpatialDimensions...................... 13 6 Second-Order Equations 14 6.1ClassificationbyCharacteristics....................... 14 6.2CanonicalFormsandGeneralSolutions.................. 14 6.3Well-Posedness................................ 19 7WaveEquation 23 7.1TheInitialValueProblem.......................... 23 7.2WeakSolutions................................ 24 7.3 Initial/Boundary Value Problem . 24 7.4Duhamel’sPrinciple............................. 24 7.5TheNonhomogeneousEquation....................... 24 7.6HigherDimensions.............................. 26 7.6.1 Spherical Means . 26 7.6.2 ApplicationtotheCauchyProblem................ 26 7.6.3 Three-DimensionalWaveEquation................. 27 7.6.4 Two-DimensionalWaveEquation.................. 28 7.6.5 Huygen’sPrinciple.......................... 28 7.7EnergyMethods............................... 29 7.8ContractionMappingPrinciple....................... 30 8 Laplace Equation 31 8.1Green’sFormulas............................... 31 8.2PolarCoordinates.............................. 32 8.3 Polar Laplacian in R2 forRadialFunctions................ 32 8.4 Spherical Laplacian in R3 and Rn forRadialFunctions.......... 32 8.5 Cylindrical Laplacian in R3 forRadialFunctions............. 33 8.6MeanValueTheorem............................. 33 8.7MaximumPrinciple............................. 33 8.8 The Fundamental Solution . 34 8.9RepresentationTheorem........................... 37 8.10Green’sFunctionandthePoissonKernel.................. 42 Partial Differential Equations Igor Yanovsky, 2005 4 8.11PropertiesofHarmonicFunctions...................... 44 8.12EigenvaluesoftheLaplacian......................... 44 9HeatEquation 45 9.1ThePureInitialValueProblem....................... 45 9.1.1 FourierTransform.......................... 45 9.1.2 Multi-IndexNotation........................ 45 9.1.3 Solution of the Pure Initial Value Problem . 49 9.1.4 NonhomogeneousEquation..................... 50 9.1.5 Nonhomogeneous Equation with Nonhomogeneous Initial Condi- tions.................................. 50 9.1.6 The Fundamental Solution . 50 10 Schr¨odinger Equation 52 11 Problems: Quasilinear Equations 54 12 Problems: Shocks 75 13 Problems: General Nonlinear Equations 86 13.1TwoSpatialDimensions........................... 86 13.2ThreeSpatialDimensions.......................... 93 14 Problems: First-Order Systems 102 15 Problems: Gas Dynamics Systems 127 15.1Perturbation................................. 127 15.2StationarySolutions............................. 128 15.3PeriodicSolutions.............................. 130 15.4EnergyEstimates............................... 136 16 Problems: Wave Equation 139 16.1TheInitialValueProblem.......................... 139 16.2 Initial/Boundary Value Problem . 141 16.3SimilaritySolutions.............................. 155 16.4TravelingWaveSolutions.......................... 156 16.5Dispersion................................... 171 16.6EnergyMethods............................... 174 16.7WaveEquationin2Dand3D........................ 187 17 Problems: Laplace Equation 196 17.1Green’sFunctionandthePoissonKernel.................. 196 17.2 The Fundamental Solution . 205 17.3RadialVariables............................... 216 17.4WeakSolutions................................ 221 17.5Uniqueness.................................. 223 17.6Self-AdjointOperators............................ 232 17.7 Spherical Means . 242 17.8 Harmonic Extensions, Subharmonic Functions . 249 Partial Differential Equations Igor Yanovsky, 2005 5 18 Problems: Heat Equation 255 18.1HeatEquationwithLowerOrderTerms.................. 263 18.1.1HeatEquationEnergyEstimates.................. 264 19 Contraction Mapping and Uniqueness - Wave 271 20 Contraction Mapping and Uniqueness - Heat 273 21 Problems: Maximum Principle - Laplace and Heat 279 21.1HeatEquation-MaximumPrincipleandUniqueness........... 279 21.2LaplaceEquation-MaximumPrinciple.................. 281 22 Problems: Separation of Variables - Laplace Equation 282 23 Problems: Separation of Variables - Poisson Equation 302 24 Problems: Separation of Variables - Wave Equation 305 25 Problems: Separation of Variables - Heat Equation 309 26 Problems: Eigenvalues of the Laplacian - Laplace 323 27 Problems: Eigenvalues of the Laplacian - Poisson 333 28 Problems: Eigenvalues of the Laplacian - Wave 338 29 Problems: Eigenvalues of the Laplacian - Heat 346 29.1 Heat Equation with Periodic Boundary Conditions in 2D (withextraterms).............................. 360 30 Problems: Fourier Transform 365 31 Laplace Transform 385 32 Linear Functional Analysis 393 32.1Norms..................................... 393 32.2BanachandHilbertSpaces......................... 393 32.3Cauchy-SchwarzInequality......................... 393 32.4 H¨olderInequality............................... 393 32.5MinkowskiInequality............................. 394 32.6SobolevSpaces................................ 394 Partial Differential Equations Igor Yanovsky, 2005 6 1 Trigonometric Identities L nπx mπx 0 n = m cos cos dx = cos(a + b)=cosa cos b − sin a sin b − L L Ln= m L − cos(a b)=cosa cos b +sina sin b L nπx mπx 0 n = m sin(a + b)=sina cos b +cosa sin b sin sin dx = −L L L Ln= m sin(a − b)=sina cos b − cos a sin b L nπx mπx sin cos dx =0 −L L L cos(a + b)+cos(a − b) cos a cos b = 2 − sin(a + b)+sin(a b) L nπx mπx 0 n = m sin a cos b = cos cos dx = 2 L 0 L L n = m cos(a − b) − cos(a + b) 2 sin a sin b = L nπx mπx 0 n = m 2 sin sin dx = L L L 0 2 n = m cos 2t =cos2 t − sin2 t sin 2t =2sint cos t L inx imx 0 n = m 2 1 1+cost e e dx = cos t = Ln= m 2 2 0 − 2 1 1 cos t L sin t = inx 0 n =0 2 2 e dx = 0 Ln=0 1+tan2 t =sec2 t x sin x cos x cot2 t +1 = csc2 t sin2 xdx= − 2 2 2 x sin x cos x eix + e−ix cos xdx= + cos x = 2 2 2 2 eix − e−ix tan xdx=tanx − x sin x = 2i cos2 x sin x cos xdx= − 2 ex + e−x cosh x = 2 − ex − e x ln(xy)=ln(x)+ln(y) sinh x = x 2 ln =ln(x) − ln(y) y d ln xr = r lnx cosh x = sinh(x) dx d sinh x =cosh(x) dx ln xdx = x ln x − x 2 − 2 x2 x2 cosh x sinh x =1 x ln xdx = ln x − 2 4 du 1 u = tan−1 + C 2 2 √ a + u a a −z2 du u e dz = π √ =sin−1 + C R 2 2 2 √ a − u a − z e 2 dz = 2π R Partial Differential Equations Igor Yanovsky, 2005 7 ab − 1 d −b A = ,A1 = cd det(A) −ca Partial Differential Equations Igor Yanovsky, 2005 8 2 Simple Eigenvalue Problem X + λX =0 Boundary conditions Eigenvalues λ Eigenfunctions X n n nπ 2 nπ X(0) = X(L)=0 L sin L xn=1, 2,... (n− 1 )π 2 (n− 1 )π X(0) = X (L)=0 2 sin 2 xn=1, 2,... L L (n− 1 )π 2 (n− 1 )π X (0) = X(L)=0 2 cos 2 xn=1, 2,... L L nπ 2 nπ X (0) = X (L)=0 L cos L xn=0, 1, 2,... 2nπ 2 2nπ X(0) = X(L),X(0) = X (L) L sin L xn=1, 2,... 2nπ cos L xn=0, 1, 2,... − − nπ 2 nπ X( L)=X(L),X( L)=X (L) L sin L xn=1, 2,... nπ cos L xn=0, 1, 2,... X − λX =0 Boundary conditions Eigenvalues λ Eigenfunctions X n n nπ 4 nπ X(0) = X(L)=0,X(0) = X (L)=0 L sin L xn=1, 2,... nπ 4 nπ X (0) = X (L)=0,X (0) = X (L)=0 L cos L xn=0, 1, 2,... Partial Differential Equations Igor Yanovsky, 2005 9 3 Separation of Variables: 4 Eigenvalues of the Lapla- Quick Guide cian: Quick Guide Laplace Equation: u =0. Laplace Equation: uxx + uyy + λu =0. X (x) −Y (y) − X Y = = λ. + + λ =0. (λ = μ2 + ν2) X(x) Y (y) X Y X + λX =0. X + μ2X =0,Y + ν2Y =0. X (t) Y (θ) = − = λ. X(t) Y (θ) Y (θ)+λY (θ)=0. 2 uxx + uyy + k u =0. Wave Equation: utt − uxx =0. X Y 2 2 − = + k = c . X (x) T (t) X Y = = −λ. X(x) T (t) X + c2X =0, X + λX =0. Y +(k2 − c2)Y =0. utt +3ut + u = uxx. T T X − +3 +1 = = λ. 2 T T X uxx + uyy + k u =0. X + λX =0. Y X − − = + k2 = c2. utt uxx + u =0. Y X T X Y + c2Y =0, +1 = = −λ. T X X +(k2 − c2)X =0. X + λX =0. 2 utt + μut = c uxx + βuxxt, (β>0) X = −λ, X 1 T μ T β T X + = 1+ . c2 T c2 T c2 T X 4th Order: utt = −kuxxxx. X 1 T − = = −λ. X k T X − λX =0. Heat Equation: ut = kuxx. T X = k = −λ. T X λ X + X =0. k 4th Order: ut = −uxxxx. T X = − = −λ. T X X − λX =0. Partial Differential Equations Igor Yanovsky, 2005 10 5First-OrderEquations 5.1 Quasilinear Equations Consider the Cauchy problem for the quasilinear equation in two variables a(x, y, u)ux + b(x, y, u)uy = c(x, y, u), with Γ parameterized by (f(s),g(s),h(s)). The characteristic equations are dx dy dz = a(x, y, z), = b(x, y, z), = c(x, y, z), dt dt dt with initial conditions x(s, 0) = f(s),y(s, 0) = g(s),z(s, 0) = h(s). dx dy In a quasilinear case, the characteristic equations for dt and dt need not decouple from dz the dt equation; this means that we must take the z values into account even to find the projected characteristic curves in the xy-plane. In particular, this allows for the possibility that the projected characteristics may cross each other. The condition for solving for s and t in terms of x and y requires that the Jacobian matrix be nonsingular: xs ys J ≡ = xsyt − ysxt =0 . xt yt In particular, at t = 0 we obtain the condition f (s) · b(f(s),g(s),h(s)) − g(s) · a(f(s),g(s),h(s)) =0 .
Recommended publications
  • Mathematics 412 Partial Differential Equations

    Mathematics 412 Partial Differential Equations

    Mathematics 412 Partial Differential Equations c S. A. Fulling Fall, 2005 The Wave Equation This introductory example will have three parts.* 1. I will show how a particular, simple partial differential equation (PDE) arises in a physical problem. 2. We’ll look at its solutions, which happen to be unusually easy to find in this case. 3. We’ll solve the equation again by separation of variables, the central theme of this course, and see how Fourier series arise. The wave equation in two variables (one space, one time) is ∂2u ∂2u = c2 , ∂t2 ∂x2 where c is a constant, which turns out to be the speed of the waves described by the equation. Most textbooks derive the wave equation for a vibrating string (e.g., Haber- man, Chap. 4). It arises in many other contexts — for example, light waves (the electromagnetic field). For variety, I shall look at the case of sound waves (motion in a gas). Sound waves Reference: Feynman Lectures in Physics, Vol. 1, Chap. 47. We assume that the gas moves back and forth in one dimension only (the x direction). If there is no sound, then each bit of gas is at rest at some place (x,y,z). There is a uniform equilibrium density ρ0 (mass per unit volume) and pressure P0 (force per unit area). Now suppose the gas moves; all gas in the layer at x moves the same distance, X(x), but gas in other layers move by different distances. More precisely, at each time t the layer originally at x is displaced to x + X(x,t).
  • Elliptic Pdes

    Elliptic Pdes

    viii CHAPTER 4 Elliptic PDEs One of the main advantages of extending the class of solutions of a PDE from classical solutions with continuous derivatives to weak solutions with weak deriva- tives is that it is easier to prove the existence of weak solutions. Having estab- lished the existence of weak solutions, one may then study their properties, such as uniqueness and regularity, and perhaps prove under appropriate assumptions that the weak solutions are, in fact, classical solutions. There is often considerable freedom in how one defines a weak solution of a PDE; for example, the function space to which a solution is required to belong is not given a priori by the PDE itself. Typically, we look for a weak formulation that reduces to the classical formulation under appropriate smoothness assumptions and which is amenable to a mathematical analysis; the notion of solution and the spaces to which solutions belong are dictated by the available estimates and analysis. 4.1. Weak formulation of the Dirichlet problem Let us consider the Dirichlet problem for the Laplacian with homogeneous boundary conditions on a bounded domain Ω in Rn, (4.1) −∆u = f in Ω, (4.2) u =0 on ∂Ω. First, suppose that the boundary of Ω is smooth and u,f : Ω → R are smooth functions. Multiplying (4.1) by a test function φ, integrating the result over Ω, and using the divergence theorem, we get ∞ (4.3) Du · Dφ dx = fφ dx for all φ ∈ Cc (Ω). ZΩ ZΩ The boundary terms vanish because φ = 0 on the boundary.
  • Elliptic Pdes

    Elliptic Pdes

    CHAPTER 4 Elliptic PDEs One of the main advantages of extending the class of solutions of a PDE from classical solutions with continuous derivatives to weak solutions with weak deriva- tives is that it is easier to prove the existence of weak solutions. Having estab- lished the existence of weak solutions, one may then study their properties, such as uniqueness and regularity, and perhaps prove under appropriate assumptions that the weak solutions are, in fact, classical solutions. There is often considerable freedom in how one defines a weak solution of a PDE; for example, the function space to which a solution is required to belong is not given a priori by the PDE itself. Typically, we look for a weak formulation that reduces to the classical formulation under appropriate smoothness assumptions and which is amenable to a mathematical analysis; the notion of solution and the spaces to which solutions belong are dictated by the available estimates and analysis. 4.1. Weak formulation of the Dirichlet problem Let us consider the Dirichlet problem for the Laplacian with homogeneous boundary conditions on a bounded domain Ω in Rn, (4.1) −∆u = f in Ω; (4.2) u = 0 on @Ω: First, suppose that the boundary of Ω is smooth and u; f : Ω ! R are smooth functions. Multiplying (4.1) by a test function φ, integrating the result over Ω, and using the divergence theorem, we get Z Z 1 (4.3) Du · Dφ dx = fφ dx for all φ 2 Cc (Ω): Ω Ω The boundary terms vanish because φ = 0 on the boundary.
  • Advanced Partial Differential Equations Prof. Dr. Thomas

    Advanced Partial Differential Equations Prof. Dr. Thomas

    Advanced Partial Differential Equations Prof. Dr. Thomas Sørensen summer term 2015 Marcel Schaub July 2, 2015 1 Contents 0 Recall PDE 1 & Motivation 3 0.1 Recall PDE 1 . .3 1 Weak derivatives and Sobolev spaces 7 1.1 Sobolev spaces . .8 1.2 Approximation by smooth functions . 11 1.3 Extension of Sobolev functions . 13 1.4 Traces . 15 1.5 Sobolev inequalities . 17 2 Linear 2nd order elliptic PDE 25 2.1 Linear 2nd order elliptic partial differential operators . 25 2.2 Weak solutions . 26 2.3 Existence via Lax-Milgram . 28 2.4 Inhomogeneous bounday value problems . 35 2.5 The space H−1(U) ................................ 36 2.6 Regularity of weak solutions . 39 A Tutorials 58 A.1 Tutorial 1: Review of Integration . 58 A.2 Tutorial 2 . 59 A.3 Tutorial 3: Norms . 61 A.4 Tutorial 4 . 62 A.5 Tutorial 6 (Sheet 7) . 65 A.6 Tutorial 7 . 65 A.7 Tutorial 9 . 67 A.8 Tutorium 11 . 67 B Solutions of the problem sheets 70 B.1 Solution to Sheet 1 . 70 B.2 Solution to Sheet 2 . 71 B.3 Solution to Problem Sheet 3 . 73 B.4 Solution to Problem Sheet 4 . 76 B.5 Solution to Exercise Sheet 5 . 77 B.6 Solution to Exercise Sheet 7 . 81 B.7 Solution to problem sheet 8 . 84 B.8 Solution to Exercise Sheet 9 . 87 2 0 Recall PDE 1 & Motivation 0.1 Recall PDE 1 We mainly studied linear 2nd order equations – specifically, elliptic, parabolic and hyper- bolic equations. Concretely: • The Laplace equation ∆u = 0 (elliptic) • The Poisson equation −∆u = f (elliptic) • The Heat equation ut − ∆u = 0, ut − ∆u = f (parabolic) • The Wave equation utt − ∆u = 0, utt − ∆u = f (hyperbolic) We studied (“main motivation; goal”) well-posedness (à la Hadamard) 1.
  • Chapter 2. Steady States and Boundary Value Problems

    Chapter 2. Steady States and Boundary Value Problems

    “rjlfdm” 2007/4/10 i i page 13 i i Copyright ©2007 by the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics This electronic version is for personal use and may not be duplicated or distributed. Chapter 2 Steady States and Boundary Value Problems We will first consider ordinary differential equations (ODEs) that are posed on some in- terval a < x < b, together with some boundary conditions at each end of the interval. In the next chapter we will extend this to more than one space dimension and will study elliptic partial differential equations (ODEs) that are posed in some region of the plane or Q5 three-dimensional space and are solved subject to some boundary conditions specifying the solution and/or its derivatives around the boundary of the region. The problems considered in these two chapters are generally steady-state problems in which the solution varies only with the spatial coordinates but not with time. (But see Section 2.16 for a case where Œa; b is a time interval rather than an interval in space.) Steady-state problems are often associated with some time-dependent problem that describes the dynamic behavior, and the 2-point boundary value problem (BVP) or elliptic equation results from considering the special case where the solution is steady in time, and hence the time-derivative terms are equal to zero, simplifying the equations. 2.1 The heat equation As a specific example, consider the flow of heat in a rod made out of some heat-conducting material, subject to some external heat source along its length and some boundary condi- tions at each end.
  • Solving the Boundary Value Problems for Differential Equations with Fractional Derivatives by the Method of Separation of Variables

    Solving the Boundary Value Problems for Differential Equations with Fractional Derivatives by the Method of Separation of Variables

    mathematics Article Solving the Boundary Value Problems for Differential Equations with Fractional Derivatives by the Method of Separation of Variables Temirkhan Aleroev National Research Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (NRU MGSU), Yaroslavskoe Shosse, 26, 129337 Moscow, Russia; [email protected] Received: 16 September 2020; Accepted: 22 October 2020; Published: 29 October 2020 Abstract: This paper is devoted to solving boundary value problems for differential equations with fractional derivatives by the Fourier method. The necessary information is given (in particular, theorems on the completeness of the eigenfunctions and associated functions, multiplicity of eigenvalues, and questions of the localization of root functions and eigenvalues are discussed) from the spectral theory of non-self-adjoint operators generated by differential equations with fractional derivatives and boundary conditions of the Sturm–Liouville type, obtained by the author during implementation of the method of separation of variables (Fourier). Solutions of boundary value problems for a fractional diffusion equation and wave equation with a fractional derivative are presented with respect to a spatial variable. Keywords: eigenvalue; eigenfunction; function of Mittag–Leffler; fractional derivative; Fourier method; method of separation of variables In memoriam of my Father Sultan and my son Bibulat 1. Introduction Let j(x) L (0, 1). Then the function 2 1 x a d− 1 a 1 a j(x) (x t) − j(t) dt L1(0, 1) dx− ≡ G(a) − 2 Z0 is known as a fractional integral of order a > 0 beginning at x = 0 [1]. Here G(a) is the Euler gamma-function. As is known (see [1]), the function y(x) L (0, 1) is called the fractional derivative 2 1 of the function j(x) L (0, 1) of order a > 0 beginning at x = 0, if 2 1 a d− j(x) = a y(x), dx− which is written da y(x) = j(x).
  • Topics on Calculus of Variations

    Topics on Calculus of Variations

    TOPICS ON CALCULUS OF VARIATIONS AUGUSTO C. PONCE ABSTRACT. Lecture notes presented in the School on Nonlinear Differential Equa- tions (October 9–27, 2006) at ICTP, Trieste, Italy. CONTENTS 1. The Laplace equation 1 1.1. The Dirichlet Principle 2 1.2. The dawn of the Direct Methods 4 1.3. The modern formulation of the Calculus of Variations 4 1 1.4. The space H0 (Ω) 4 1.5. The weak formulation of (1.2) 8 1.6. Weyl’s lemma 9 2. The Poisson equation 11 2.1. The Newtonian potential 11 2.2. Solving (2.1) 12 3. The eigenvalue problem 13 3.1. Existence step 13 3.2. Regularity step 15 3.3. Proof of Theorem 3.1 16 4. Semilinear elliptic equations 16 4.1. Existence step 17 4.2. Regularity step 18 4.3. Proof of Theorem 4.1 20 References 20 1. THE LAPLACE EQUATION Let Ω ⊂ RN be a body made of some uniform material; on the boundary of Ω, we prescribe some fixed temperature f. Consider the following Question. What is the equilibrium temperature inside Ω? Date: August 29, 2008. 1 2 AUGUSTO C. PONCE Mathematically, if u denotes the temperature in Ω, then we want to solve the equation ∆u = 0 in Ω, (1.1) u = f on ∂Ω. We shall always assume that f : ∂Ω → R is a given smooth function and Ω ⊂ RN , N ≥ 3, is a smooth, bounded, connected open set. We say that u is a classical solution of (1.1) if u ∈ C2(Ω) and u satisfies (1.1) at every point of Ω.
  • Delta Functions and Distributions

    Delta Functions and Distributions

    When functions have no value(s): Delta functions and distributions Steven G. Johnson, MIT course 18.303 notes Created October 2010, updated March 8, 2017. Abstract x = 0. That is, one would like the function δ(x) = 0 for all x 6= 0, but with R δ(x)dx = 1 for any in- These notes give a brief introduction to the mo- tegration region that includes x = 0; this concept tivations, concepts, and properties of distributions, is called a “Dirac delta function” or simply a “delta which generalize the notion of functions f(x) to al- function.” δ(x) is usually the simplest right-hand- low derivatives of discontinuities, “delta” functions, side for which to solve differential equations, yielding and other nice things. This generalization is in- a Green’s function. It is also the simplest way to creasingly important the more you work with linear consider physical effects that are concentrated within PDEs, as we do in 18.303. For example, Green’s func- very small volumes or times, for which you don’t ac- tions are extremely cumbersome if one does not al- tually want to worry about the microscopic details low delta functions. Moreover, solving PDEs with in this volume—for example, think of the concepts of functions that are not classically differentiable is of a “point charge,” a “point mass,” a force plucking a great practical importance (e.g. a plucked string with string at “one point,” a “kick” that “suddenly” imparts a triangle shape is not twice differentiable, making some momentum to an object, and so on.
  • THE IMPACT of RIEMANN's MAPPING THEOREM in the World

    THE IMPACT of RIEMANN's MAPPING THEOREM in the World

    THE IMPACT OF RIEMANN'S MAPPING THEOREM GRANT OWEN In the world of mathematics, scholars and academics have long sought to understand the work of Bernhard Riemann. Born in a humble Ger- man home, Riemann became one of the great mathematical minds of the 19th century. Evidence of his genius is reflected in the greater mathematical community by their naming 72 different mathematical terms after him. His contributions range from mathematical topics such as trigonometric series, birational geometry of algebraic curves, and differential equations to fields in physics and philosophy [3]. One of his contributions to mathematics, the Riemann Mapping Theorem, is among his most famous and widely studied theorems. This theorem played a role in the advancement of several other topics, including Rie- mann surfaces, topology, and geometry. As a result of its widespread application, it is worth studying not only the theorem itself, but how Riemann derived it and its impact on the work of mathematicians since its publication in 1851 [3]. Before we begin to discover how he derived his famous mapping the- orem, it is important to understand how Riemann's upbringing and education prepared him to make such a contribution in the world of mathematics. Prior to enrolling in university, Riemann was educated at home by his father and a tutor before enrolling in high school. While in school, Riemann did well in all subjects, which strengthened his knowl- edge of philosophy later in life, but was exceptional in mathematics. He enrolled at the University of G¨ottingen,where he learned from some of the best mathematicians in the world at that time.
  • Analytic Solutions of Partial Differential Equations

    Analytic Solutions of Partial Differential Equations

    Analytic Solutions of Partial Differential Equations MATH3414 School of Mathematics, University of Leeds 15 credits • Taught Semester 1, • Year running 2003/04 • Pre-requisites MATH2360 or MATH2420 or equivalent. • Co-requisites None. • Objectives: To provide an understanding of, and methods of solution for, the most important • types of partial differential equations that arise in Mathematical Physics. On completion of this module, students should be able to: a) use the method of characteristics to solve first-order hyperbolic equations; b) classify a second order PDE as elliptic, parabolic or hyperbolic; c) use Green's functions to solve elliptic equations; d) have a basic understanding of diffusion; e) obtain a priori bounds for reaction-diffusion equations. Syllabus: The majority of physical phenomena can be described by partial differential equa- • tions (e.g. the Navier-Stokes equation of fluid dynamics, Maxwell's equations of electro- magnetism). This module considers the properties of, and analytical methods of solution for some of the most common first and second order PDEs of Mathematical Physics. In particu- lar, we shall look in detail at elliptic equations (Laplace?s equation), describing steady-state phenomena and the diffusion / heat conduction equation describing the slow spread of con- centration or heat. The topics covered are: First order PDEs. Semilinear and quasilinear PDEs; method of characteristics. Characteristics crossing. Second order PDEs. Classifi- cation and standard forms. Elliptic equations: weak and strong minimum and maximum principles; Green's functions. Parabolic equations: exemplified by solutions of the diffusion equation. Bounds on solutions of reaction-diffusion equations. Form of teaching • Lectures: 26 hours. 7 examples classes.
  • FETI-DP Domain Decomposition Method

    FETI-DP Domain Decomposition Method

    ECOLE´ POLYTECHNIQUE FED´ ERALE´ DE LAUSANNE Master Project FETI-DP Domain Decomposition Method Supervisors: Author: Davide Forti Christoph Jaggli¨ Dr. Simone Deparis Prof. Alfio Quarteroni A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Mathematical Engineering in the Chair of Modelling and Scientific Computing Mathematics Section June 2014 Declaration of Authorship I, Christoph Jaggli¨ , declare that this thesis titled, 'FETI-DP Domain Decomposition Method' and the work presented in it are my own. I confirm that: This work was done wholly or mainly while in candidature for a research degree at this University. Where any part of this thesis has previously been submitted for a degree or any other qualification at this University or any other institution, this has been clearly stated. Where I have consulted the published work of others, this is always clearly at- tributed. Where I have quoted from the work of others, the source is always given. With the exception of such quotations, this thesis is entirely my own work. I have acknowledged all main sources of help. Where the thesis is based on work done by myself jointly with others, I have made clear exactly what was done by others and what I have contributed myself. Signed: Date: ii ECOLE´ POLYTECHNIQUE FED´ ERALE´ DE LAUSANNE Abstract School of Basic Science Mathematics Section Master in Mathematical Engineering FETI-DP Domain Decomposition Method by Christoph Jaggli¨ FETI-DP is a dual iterative, nonoverlapping domain decomposition method. By a Schur complement procedure, the solution of a boundary value problem is reduced to solving a symmetric and positive definite dual problem in which the variables are directly related to the continuity of the solution across the interface between the subdomains.
  • An Improved Riemann Mapping Theorem and Complexity In

    An Improved Riemann Mapping Theorem and Complexity In

    AN IMPROVED RIEMANN MAPPING THEOREM AND COMPLEXITY IN POTENTIAL THEORY STEVEN R. BELL Abstract. We discuss applications of an improvement on the Riemann map- ping theorem which replaces the unit disc by another “double quadrature do- main,” i.e., a domain that is a quadrature domain with respect to both area and boundary arc length measure. Unlike the classic Riemann Mapping Theo- rem, the improved theorem allows the original domain to be finitely connected, and if the original domain has nice boundary, the biholomorphic map can be taken to be close to the identity, and consequently, the double quadrature do- main close to the original domain. We explore some of the parallels between this new theorem and the classic theorem, and some of the similarities between the unit disc and the double quadrature domains that arise here. The new results shed light on the complexity of many of the objects of potential theory in multiply connected domains. 1. Introduction The unit disc is the most famous example of a “double quadrature domain.” The average of an analytic function on the disc with respect to both area measure and with respect to boundary arc length measure yield the value of the function at the origin when these averages make sense. The Riemann Mapping Theorem states that when Ω is a simply connected domain in the plane that is not equal to the whole complex plane, a biholomorphic map of Ω to this famous double quadrature domain exists. We proved a variant of the Riemann Mapping Theorem in [16] that allows the domain Ω = C to be simply or finitely connected.