DOCSLIB.ORG

Proposed Action for the Foothills Landscape Project Is Organized to First Describe the Overall Need of the Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Proposed Action for the Foothills Landscape Project Is Organized to First Describe the Overall Need of the Project United States Proposed Action for the Department of Agriculture Foothills Landscape Forest Service Project October 2017 Chattahoochee-Oconee National Forests Dawson, Fannin, Gilmer, Habersham, Lumpkin, Murray, Rabun and White Counties, Georgia For More Information Contact: Angie Bell, Foothills Team Leader Chattahoochee-Oconee National Forests 1755 Cleveland Hwy, Gainesville, GA 30501 [email protected] FOOTHILLS LANDSCAPE PROJECT PROPOSED ACTION In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410; (2) fax: (202) 690-7442; or (3) email: [email protected]. USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender. 2 | P AGE FOOTHILLS LANDSCAPE PROJECT PROPOSED ACTION Table of Contents Overview ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 Location ........................................................................................................................................................ 4 Purpose and Need and Proposed Action ....................................................................................................... 5 Connection to the Restoration Plan ........................................................................................................... 5 Adaptive Management Approach ............................................................................................................. 6 Biologic Integrity ...................................................................................................................................... 7 Resilience to Disturbance ....................................................................................................................... 18 Connectivity ............................................................................................................................................ 22 Improvements to Soil and Water Quality ............................................................................................... 29 Proposed Changes to the Project Boundary ............................................................................................ 37 Connected Actions ...................................................................................................................................... 40 Project Design Criteria ................................................................................................................................ 42 Citations ...................................................................................................................................................... 45 Apppendix A: Old-growth Designation Stands .......................................................................................... 47 3 | P AGE FOOTHILLS LANDSCAPE PROJECT PROPOSED ACTION OVERVIEW The Chattahoochee-Oconee National Forests is planning an effort designed to restore the biological integrity, resilience to disturbance, connectivity, and soil and water quality across the Foothills Landscape. The Forest Service is preparing an Environmental Assessment (EA) that proposes to conduct restoration activities within the 143,500 acre project area that is part of the Conasauga, Blue Ridge and Chattooga River Ranger Districts. The Foothills Landscape project is a restoration project intended to assist in the “recovery of an ecosystem that has been degraded, damaged, or destroyed. Ecological restoration focuses on reestablishing the composition, structure, pattern, and ecological processes necessary to facilitate terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems sustainability, resilience, and health under current and future conditions” (FSH 2020.5). The restoration is framed by the Forest Service Strategic Goal “to protect National Forest System watersheds by implementing practices designed to maintain or improve watershed condition, which is the foundation for sustaining ecosystems and the production of renewable natural resources, values, and benefits” (FSM 2520). The Chattahoochee-Oconee Forest Plan (2004) outlines a need to manage, or restore where necessary, watersheds to provide resilient and stable conditions to support the quality of water necessary to protect ecosystem functions (page 2-20). The Southern Appalachian Assessment (1996) points out that watershed health represents the integration of terrestrial, aquatic, atmospheric and social aspects of the ecosystem. Williams et al. (1997) described the five characteristics of a healthy watershed as having a high biologic integrity, being resilient to disturbance, being highly connected, supporting high water quality and soil productivity in the long-term, and providing essential ecosystem services. The Foothills Landscape project was developed with collaborative input stretching from October 2016 to October 2017. There were two rounds of Community Conversations, four integrated workshops, five small group meetings and seven field trips convened during this time. The purpose of the engagement was to discuss and debate the restoration needs on the landscape and the potential tools to improve the ecosystem’s resilience to disturbance and sustainability. LOCATION The Foothills Landscape is located on the Conasauga, Blue Ridge, and Chattooga River Ranger Districts of the Chattahoochee National Forest in northern Georgia. The project is located in the area where the mountains are visibly reduced to the foothills. The project area includes portions of the Cohutta Wildlife Management Area and Dawson, Fannin, Gilmer, Habersham, Lumpkin, Murray, Rabun and White Counties. 4 | P AGE FOOTHILLS LANDSCAPE PROJECT PROPOSED ACTION Figure 1: Vicinity map showing the general location of the project area relative to major cities and highways in Georgia. PURPOSE AND NEED AND PROPOSED ACTION The proposed action for the Foothills Landscape project is organized to first describe the overall need of the project. A need is the overarching theme that was discovered while comparing the existing environmental conditions to the desired, achievable future conditions. In order to identify the underlying purpose of the project regarding the four primary needs, the interdisciplinary team incorporated the objectives from the Forest Plan, the US Forest Service Watershed Condition Framework, Georgia’s State Water Regional Plans, the Georgia State Wildlife Action Plan, Community Wildfire Protection Plans, Georgia’s Forest Action Plan, Shortleaf Pine Restoration Plan, Recovery Plans for Threatened and Endangered Species in the project area and information provided through the collaborative effort. The range of actions intended to meet the above mentioned purpose has been developed by the interdisciplinary team using best available science, expertise and input from the collaborative community. A more detailed description of the proposed treatments can be found in the Foothills Landscape Restoration Plan. The description of the range of actions includes the description of where the action would occur, how it would be accomplished and how much (acres, miles, sites, etc.) is being proposed. Connection to the Restoration Plan This proposed action represents the culmination of all of the input from the collaborative effort and the work by the interdisciplinary team to outline the need for restoration, gather the best available science and their professional judgement and experience. The Foothills Landscape Restoration Plan (https://www.fs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/fseprd544658.docx) was an intermediate step to document the logic and background between the inception of the project and the official proposed action. It was designed as a tool to help improve transparency, solicit feedback about the process and detail the logic that was used to generate this proposed action. You will see sidebars with links to the Restoration 5 | P AGE
Load more

Recommended publications
  • TDEC’S Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) for  the Stream’S Status Changes
    Draft Version YEAR 2016 303(d) LIST July, 2016 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION Planning and Standards Unit Division of Water Resources William R. Snodgrass Tennessee Tower 312 Rosa L. Parks Ave Nashville, TN 37243 Table of Contents Page Guidance for Understanding and Interpreting the Draft 303(d) List ……………………………………………………………………....... 1 2016 Public Meeting Schedule ……………………………………………………………. 8 Key to the 303(d) List ………………………………………………………………………. 9 TMDL Priorities ……………………………………………………………………………... 10 Draft 2016 303(d) List ……………………………………………………………………… 11 Barren River Watershed (TN05110002)…………………………………………. 11 Upper Cumberland Basin (TN05130101 & TN05130104)…………………….. 12 Obey River Watershed (TN05130105)…………………………………………... 14 Cordell Hull Watershed (TN05130106)………………………………………….. 16 Collins River Watershed (TN05130107)…………………………………………. 16 Caney Fork River Watershed (TN05130108)…………………………………… 18 Old Hickory Watershed (TN05130201)………………………………………….. 22 Cheatham Reservoir Watershed (TN05130202)……………………………….. 24 Stones River Watershed (TN05130203)………………………………………… 30 Harpeth River Watershed (TN05130204)……………………………………….. 35 Barkley Reservoir Watershed (TN05130205)…………………………………… 41 Red River Watershed (TN05130206)……………………………………………. 42 North Fork Holston River Watershed (TN06010101)…………………………... 45 South Fork Holston River Watershed (TN06010102)………………………….. 45 Watauga River Watershed (TN06010103)………………………………………. 53 Holston River Basin (TN06010104)………………………………………………. 56 Upper French Broad River Basin (TN06010105 & TN06010106)…………….
    [Show full text]
  • Hiwassee River Watershed (06020002) of the Tennessee River Basin
    HIWASSEE RIVER WATERSHED (06020002) OF THE TENNESSEE RIVER BASIN WATERSHED WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION DIVISION OF WATER POLLUTION CONTROL WATERSHED MANAGEMENT SECTION 2003 Glossary GLOSSARY 1Q20. The lowest average 1 consecutive days flow with average recurrence frequency of once every 20 years. 30Q2. The lowest average 3 consecutive days flow with average recurrence frequency of once every 2 years. 7Q10. The lowest average 7 consecutive days flow with average recurrence frequency of once every 10 years. 303(d). The section of the federal Clean Water Act that requires a listing by states, territories, and authorized tribes of impaired waters, which do not meet the water quality standards that states, territories, and authorized tribes have set for them, even after point sources of pollution have installed the minimum required levels of pollution control technology. 305(b). The section of the federal Clean Water Act that requires EPA to assemble and submit a report to Congress on the condition of all water bodies across the Country as determined by a biennial collection of data and other information by States and Tribes. AFO. Animal Feeding Operation. Ambient Sites. Those sites established for long term instream monitoring of water quality. ARAP. Aquatic Resource Alteration Permit. Assessment. The result of an analysis of how well streams meet the water quality criteria assigned to them. Bankfull Discharge. The momentary maximum peak flow before a stream overflows its banks onto a floodplain. Basin. An area that drains several smaller watersheds to a common point. Most watersheds in Tennessee are part of the Cumberland, Mississippi, or Tennessee Basin (The Conasauga River and Barren River Watersheds are the exceptions).
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Tennessee River (Group 3)
    LOWER TENNESSEE RIVER WATERSHED (06020001) OF THE TENNESSEE RIVER BASIN WATERSHED WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION DIVISION OF WATER POLLUTION CONTROL WATERSHED MANAGEMENT SECTION LOWER TENNESSEE RIVER WATERSHED (GROUP 3) WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Glossary Chapter 1. Watershed Approach to Water Quality Chapter 2. Description of the Lower Tennessee River Watershed Chapter 3. Water Quality Assessment of the Lower Tennessee River Watershed Chapter 4. Point and Nonpoint Source Characterization of the Lower Tennessee River Watershed Chapter 5. Water Quality Partnerships in the Lower Tennessee River Watershed Chapter 6. Future Plans Appendix I Appendix II Appendix III Appendix IV Appendix V Glossary GLOSSARY 1Q20. The lowest average 1 consecutive days flow with average recurrence frequency of once every 20 years. 30Q2. The lowest average 3 consecutive days flow with average recurrence frequency of once every 2 years. 7Q10. The lowest average 7 consecutive days flow with average recurrence frequency of once every 10 years. 303(d). The section of the federal Clean Water Act that requires a listing by states, territories, and authorized tribes of impaired waters, which do not meet the water quality standards that states, territories, and authorized tribes have set for them, even after point sources of pollution have installed the minimum required levels of pollution control technology. 305(b). The section of the federal Clean Water Act that requires EPA to assemble and submit a report to Congress on the condition of all water bodies across the Country as determined by a biennial collection of data and other information by States and Tribes.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary
    Conasauga and Wildcat Creeks Ecosystem Assessment Tellico & Ocoee/Hiwassee Ranger Districts Cherokee National Forest Table of Contents INTRODUCTION…………..…………………………………....... 1 Description of Watersheds..……………………………………... 1 PHYSICAL ELEMENTS…………………………………………. 3 Soils/Watershed/Riparian, Wetlands & Floodplains...................... 3 Air………………………………………………………............... 7 Minerals……………………………………………….…………. 11 BIOLOGICAL ELEMENTS…………………………………….... 12 Major Forest Communities………………………………………. 14 Rare Communities……………………………………………….. 21 Successional Habitats……………………………………………. 22 Terrestrial Habitat Attributes…………………………………….. 28 Aquatic Habitats…………………………………...…………...... 31 Demand Species…………………………………………………. 32 Non-Native Invasive Plants and Animals.……………………….. 33 Species Viability.……………………………..……….…………. 35 Forest Health …………………………..……………................... 39 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS…...……………… 43 Recreation Related Programs…...……………………………….. 43 Heritage Resources………………………………………………. 48 Forest Products……………………………………....................... 49 Special Uses/Lands………………………………………………. 50 Prescribed and Wildland Fires…………………………................ 52 Roads and Access………………………………………………... 54 APPENDIX A - Goals and Objectives……………………………. 56 APPENDIX B – Travel Analysis Process Report………………… 78 Introduction Description of Assessment Area The Conasauga and Wildcat Creeks Assessment Area is located about seven miles west of Tellico Plains, Tennessee in the Blue Ridge Mountains. The area is located in the Southern Metasedimentary Mountain Eco-region. The two
    [Show full text]
  • Camp Coker Creek
    CAMP COKER CREEK INVESTIGATION OF THE PRESENCE AND SPATIAL CONFIGURATION OF A CONFEDERATE ENCAMPMENT WITHIN THE MULTICOMPONENT 40MR708 ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE By Andrius Valiunas Honors Thesis Curriculum in Archaeology The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill April 25th, 2012 Approved by: Adviser: Dr. Brett H. Riggs ABSTRACT ANDRIUS VALIUNAS Camp Coker Creek: Investigation of the Presence and Spatial Configuration of a Confederate Encampment within the Multicomponent 40MR708 Archaeological Site (Under the direction of Dr. Brett H. Riggs) Ongoing historical and archaeological research has revealed the site 40MR708, colloquially Fort Armistead, in Coker Creek, Monroe County Tennessee to be a spatiotemporally vast and complex example of human occupation. Up until 2011, three major occupational periods had been identified; an archaic Native American lithic reduction site, a stock stand (Meroney’s Stand), and an Indian Removal period military base identified as Camp/Fort Armistead (1832-1838). Recent investigations into the northeastern portion of the site revealed the presence of another component that was structurally distinct yet spatially aware of the fort. Excavations and preliminary analysis suggested a military use that postdated Fort Armistead. The subsequent research task was to then identify this most recent occupation of 40MR708, and determine how and to what extent it was spatiotemporally and structurally related to the other components, particularly Fort Armistead. The Unicoi Path/Turnpike proved to be the major structural element connecting all of the components ii spatially and temporally. It transects the area, and was one of the major roads of communication, travel and trade, regardless of time period. The context of the latest component was identified as Camp Coker Creek the transient headquarters and camp for parts of The 69th North Carolina Regiment, Thomas’ Confederate Legion of Cherokee Indians and Mountaineers.
    [Show full text]
  • Cherokee National Forest 2005 South Zone Restoration Strategy
    Restoration Strategy United States for the South Zone Department of Agriculture Forest Service June 2005 of the Cherokee National Forest Table of Contents Introduction Page 1 Watersheds Evaluated Page 2 Summary of Forest Plan Page 3 and other Objectives 10 year action Plan and Page 10 estimated outputs High Priority Projects and Page 13 unique opportunities Watershed Descriptions Page 14 Conasauga River Page 14 Little Tennessee River Page 15 Tellico River Page 17 Hiwassee River Page 20 Conasauga Creek Page 23 Ocoee River Page 24 Appendixes Page 28 A – Team Members Page 28 B - GOS Team Objective Distribution Page 29 C - Fire Management Report Page 34 D – Botanical TES Report Page 36 ii Introduction A new direction for management of the Cherokee National Forest began with the signing of the Revised Land and Resource Management Plan in January of 2004. The Plan provides broad program level direction for the next 10 to 15 years. However, it does not provide guidance on when, where, or how to accomplish goals and objectives. The process used to develop this document was intended to bridge between the program level direction of the Plan and ground level actions. It attempts to answer where, when and how to accomplish the goals and objectives. Primary uses of the document include the following: 1. A strategic approach to forest plan implementation. The process provides a road map to implementation of the forest plan. 2. A “Measuring Stick” to evaluate progress in implementing the forest plan. The document provides estimates of accomplishments by certain times. In the years to come, the predictions and actual outputs can be compared, and adjustments can be made to better implement the forest plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Low Flows and Flow Duration of Tennessee Streams Through 1981
    --- -_-__ LOW FLOWS AND FLOW DURATION OF TENNESSEE STREAMS THROUGH 1981 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 84-4347 Prepared in cooperation with the TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT, DIVISION OF WATER MANAGEMENT Table 2.--LOW-FWW CHARACTERISTICS FOR PARTIAL RECORDSTATIONS AND HISCELLANEOUSSITES--Continued REF STATION STATION N&E DRAINAGE LOCATION l-DAY MEAN ~-DAY MEAN 7-DAY MEAN )-DAY HEAN NO. NO. WW FIDU LoWfIRW WWFWW LOW FLOW ,~~I, lo-YR 10-m 10-m zo-YR REaRHENCE REOJRRENCE RECURRJNCE RECURUNCE (CFS) (CFS) (CFS) (CFS) TENNGSSEERIVER BASIN--Continued 382 D3565DBO LITTLE CHESTUEE 8.54 LAT 35 25 36, LONG 084 26 46, 2.05 2.07 2.10 1.97 CREEKNEAR HCHINN COUNTY, AT FORD, 1.6 ENCLEUOOD,TN. MILES ABOVE MOUTH, 1.8 NILES EAST NORTHWLSTOF ENCLEWOOD. 383 03565087 CHESTUEECREEK AT 33.5 LAT 35 24 22, WNG 084 29 49, *** *** ** 6 WY 4llNWIR MCNINN COUNTY, AT BRIDGE ON ENGLEUOOD,TN. U.S. WY 411, 1.4 MILES SOUTHJESTOF ENGLEUOOD. 384 03565130 DANCING CREEK NR 2.90 LAT 35 31 09, WNC 084 25 17, 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.04 CHRISTIANSUWC, TN. MONROE COUNTY, 1.8 MILES SOUTHEASTOF CNRISTIANBURG, 50 FT SEWW (DNFLUENCE3F THREE TRIBUTARIES, 60 fT BEWU OUNTY ROAD BRIDGE. 385 035654135 LITTLS CHATATA CREEK 2.04 LAT 35 lo lo. LONG 084 49 30, l c* 0.3 NR CLEVELAND, TN. BRADLEY UJUNTY, AT BLYTHE FERRY ROAD. 2.8 MILES NORTHEASTdF CLEVELAND. 306 03565410 CNATATA CREEK NEAR 24.3 LAT 35 13 11, LONG 084 45 56, ** *** 3.1 TASSO, TN.
    [Show full text]
  • Middle and Upper Tellico River Ecosystem Assessment Tellico Ranger District Cherokee National Forest
    Middle and Upper Tellico River Ecosystem Assessment Tellico Ranger District Cherokee National Forest Table of Contents INTRODUCTION…………..…………………………………....... 1 Description of Watershed………………………………………... 1 PHYSICAL ELEMENTS…………………………………………. 3 Soils/Watershed/Riparian, Wetlands & Floodplains...................... 3 Air………………………………………………………............... 6 Minerals……………………………………………….…………. 11 BIOLOGICAL ELEMENTS…………………………………….... 12 Major Forest Communities………………………………………. 14 Rare Communities……………………………………………….. 23 Successional Habitats……………………………………………. 26 Terrestrial Habitat Attributes…………………………………….. 37 Aquatic Habitats…………………………………...…………...... 40 Threatened & Endangered Species…………………...............….. 45 Demand Species…………………………………………………. 45 Non-Native Invasive Plants and Animals.……………………….. 47 Species Viability.……………………………..……….…………. 48 Forest Health …………………………..……………................... 50 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS…...……………… 53 Recreation Related Programs…...……………………………….. 53 Heritage Resources………………………………………………. 57 Forest Products……………………………………....................... 59 Special Uses/Lands………………………………………………. 61 Prescribed and Wildland Fires…………………………................ 62 Roads and Access………………………………………………... 64 APPENDIX A - Goals and Objectives……………………………. 67 APPENDIX B – Roads Analysis Process Report………………… Introduction Description of Watershed The Middle and Upper Tellico River (MUTR) Assessment Area is located in Monroe County, Tennessee, in the area adjacent to Tellico Plains. Figure 1 displays the location of the assessment
    [Show full text]
  • ALLEN, Penelope Johnson, Cherokee Collection
    State of Tennessee Department of State Tennessee State Library and Archives 403 Seventh Avenue North Nashville, Tennessee 37243-0312 PENELOPE JOHNSON ALLEN CHEROKEE COLLECTION 1775-1878 Processed by: Gracia M. Hardacre Archival Technical Services Accession Number: 1787 Date Completed: September 7, 1966 Location: VI-C-1-4 Microfilm Accession Number: 815 MICROFILMED INTRODUCTION The Penelope Johnson Allen Cherokee Collection spans the years 1775-1878 and contains materials relating to the Cherokees and to John Ross (1790-1866), Principal Chief of the Cherokees, 1828-1866. The collection was purchased from Mrs. Penelope Johnson Allen of Chattanooga, Tennessee, who previously obtained the portion belonging to John Ross from his grandson, Robert Bruce Ross (1845-1930). The abstract of provisions (1836) issued to Cherokee Indians (30 pages) was a gift of Roy Ashley of Big Spring, Tennessee (ac. no. 69-301). The materials described in this finding aid measure 7.98 linear feet. There are no restrictions on the materials. Single photocopies of unpublished writings in the Cherokee Collection may be made for purposes of scholarly research. SCOPE AND CONTENT This collection consists of the papers of John Ross (1790-1866), statesman and Principal Chief of the Cherokees from 1828-1866, and of materials relating to the Cherokees added after his time. The papers of John Ross are comprised of the following: correspondence (1788-1866), documents of the Cherokee Nation (1781-1850), papers relating to Brainerd Mission (1816-1831), surveys (1819-1820), and claims (1817-1845). Material relating to the Cherokees is as follows: negative photostatic copies of letters and documents (1775-1876) from the Virginia State Papers of the Virginia State Library in Richmond, Virginia; U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Flow Duration and Low Flows of Tennessee Streams Through 1992
    Flow Duration and Low Flows of Tennessee Streams through 1992 By GEORGE S. OUTLAW and JESS D. WEAVER U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 95-4293 Prepared in cooperation with the TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION and the TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY Nashville, Tennessee 1996 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Gordon P. Eaton, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm name in this report is for identification purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey. For additional information write to: Copies of this report may be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Earth Science Information Center 810 Broadway, Suite 500 Open-File Reports Section Nashville, Tennessee 37203 Box 25286, MS 517 Denver Federal Center Denver, Colorado 80225 CONTENTS Abstract.................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose and scope ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 Previous studies..........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Low - Flow Frequency and Flow Duration of Tennessee Streams
    LOW - FLOW FREQUENCY AND FLOW DURATION OF TENNESSEE STREAMS U. S. Geological Survey ! I OPEN-FILE REPORT 78-807 . 1 SELECTED REFERENCES Burchett, C. R., and Moore, G. K., 1971, Water resources in the Upper Stones Basin, Central Tennessee: Tennessee Div. of Water Resources, Water Resources Series No. 8, 62 p. Cragwall, J. S. Jr., 1966, Low-flow analysis of streamflow data: Vanderbilt University Dept. of Civil Engineering, Technical Report No. 9, 242 p. Eaton, W. B., 1958, Summary of flow duration and low flow at stream- gaging stations in Tennessee: U.S. Geol. Survey open-file report, 137 p. Furness, L. W., and Busby, M. W., 1967, Two methods of estimating base flow at ungaged stream sites in Kansas and adjacent states: U.S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 575-C, p. C208- C211. Goddard, G. C. Jr., 1963, Water-supply characteristics of North Carolina streams: U.S. Geol. Survey Water-Supply Paper 1761, 223 p. Hines, M. S., 1975, Flow-duration and low-flow frequency determinations of selected Arkansas Streams: Arkansas Geological Commission, Water Resources Circular No. 12, 75 p. Hoggart, R. E., 1962, Low-flow characteristics of Indiana Streams: Indiana Stream Pollution Control Board, 171 p. Kernodle, J. M., and Wilson, J. M., 1973, Water use in Tennessee, 1970: Tennessee Division of Water Resources, Water Use Series No. 4, 102 p. Langbein, W. B., and Iseri, K. T., 1960, General introduction and hydrologic definitions: U.S. Geol. Survey Water Supply Paper 1541-A, 29 p. May, V. J., Wood, G. H., and Rima, D. R., 1970, A proposed streamflow data program for Tennessee: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Analysis for the Conacat Environmental Assessment Jim Herrig 3/2014
    Aquatic Analysis for the ConaCat Environmental Assessment Jim Herrig 3/2014 Introduction The ConaCat Environmental Assessment has the potential to impact aquatic species within its analysis area. This document analyzes the effects to aquatic habitats and to aquatic species known to occur within the analysis area. It also analyses effects to certain rare aquatic species whose range falls within the analysis area, have suitable habitat present, but have not been documented in the analysis area. Alternatives Table 1. Comparison of Alternatives Alt B. ACTIVITY UNITS ALT. A ALT. C (PA) VEGETATION Seedtree with Reserves Acres 0 88 86 Shelterwood with Reserves Acres 0 535 361 Clearcut with Reserves Acres 0 23 23 Removal Acres 0 15 12 Site Preparation – 0 slashdown Acres 401 223 0 slashdown and burning Acres 260 247 Regeneration – Oak planting Acres 0 118 64 Pine planting Acres 0 304 276 Natural Acres 0 202 93 Pine & Oak Planting Acres 37 37 Seedling release - chemical Acres 0 661 470 Tree Release Mechanical 15 15 Mid-story- Mechanical Acres 0 987 1048 Thinning Acres 0 13 29 TRANSPORTATION Road Reconstruction Miles 0 8 6.1 Temporary Rd Construction Miles 0 2 2 Road Decommissioning Miles 0 1.8 2.4 Road Maintenance Miles x 15 13 Gate Installation Number 0 1 1 Roads added to system Miles 0 .7 .7 WILDLIFE HABITAT High Elevation Early Successional Habitat Creation 0 27 27 and Maintenance Acres Maintenance of openings Acres 19 19 19 Edge feathering spot openings Acres 0 3.5 3.5 Daylight/Herbicide linear 0 42 42 openings Acres Creation of ephemeral
    [Show full text]