DOCSLIB.ORG

Trial Outcomes in Child Death Cases: Influenced by Mothering Myths?", University of Southampton, Faculty of Business, Law and Art, School of Law

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Trial Outcomes in Child Death Cases: Influenced by Mothering Myths? University of Southampton Research Repository Copyright © and Moral Rights for this thesis and, where applicable, any accompanying data are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis and the accompanying data cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder/s. The content of the thesis and accompanying research data (where applicable) must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holder/s. When referring to this thesis and any accompanying data, full bibliographic details must be given, e.g. Thesis: NGF Orr (2017) " Trial outcomes in child death cases: influenced by mothering myths?", University of Southampton, Faculty of Business, Law and Art, School of Law. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON Faculty of Business, Law and Art School of Law Trial outcomes in child death cases: influenced by mothering myths? NGF Orr Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 6 November 2016 i ii UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON ABSTRACT FACULTY OF BUSINESS LAW AND ART School of Law Doctor of Philosophy TRIAL OUTCOMES IN CHILD DEATH CASES: INFLUENCED BY MOTHERING MYTHS? NGF Orr This thesis draws on the insights of rape myth scholarship and also critical responses to battered women who kill to argue that trial outcomes in child death cases may have been influenced by mothering myths. It argues that in order to understand the reasons for wrongful convictions in such cases, we must look beyond the issue of flawed expert evidence, namely to possibly stereotypical interpretations of maternal behaviours around the time the children died. Notwithstanding the difficulties in reading across from rape trials to child death cases, and that both rape myth acceptance research and the carceral approach have been challenged, Gerger et al’s definition of a rape myth is adapted here to theorise a mothering myth. Child death cases are interrogated to identify evidence admitted of maternal behaviours, and using the theorisation of a mothering myth, this thesis suggests that if fixed beliefs were used to interpret maternal behaviours, biased inferences may have been made. Little evidence of the probative value of such material has been identified. This thesis therefore examines why evidence of maternal behaviour was admitted and whether mothering myths may have informed aspects of child death cases including admissibility, the absence of judicial directions and jury deliberations. Options to limit the extent to which juries in future child death cases can rely on mothering myths are considered, and proposals for new judicial directions are made. A roadmap of empirical research is proposed to test the suggested analogies between rape myths and mothering myths, drawing on the methodological insights of rape myth work. iii iv Acknowledgements I would like to thank my supervisory team of Professor Hazel Biggs, Professor David Gurnham and Dr Caroline Jones together with Professor Emma Laurie and Mrs Debbie Evans for their kind support. v vi List of Contents Page Table of Cases …………………………………………………………………………………………1 Table of Statutes……………………………………………………………………………………...11 Abbreviations…………………………………………………………………………………………15 Introduction: Trial outcomes in child death cases: influenced by mothering myths? I—1.0 Introduction………………………………………………………………………………..…19 I—1.1 Wrongful convictions: reasons and consequences…………………………………....23 I—1.2 Are there hidden reasons for wrongful convictions?....................................................41 I—1.2.1 Fathers…………………………………………………………….......45 I—2.0 Chapter layout : summary explanations……………………………………………………....45 Chapter One: Interpreting the feminine: seeking analogies in the criminal justice system 1.0 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………..49 1.1 Women’s behaviour as evidence……………………………………………………………..50 1.1.2 Women’s behaviour: is it stereotypically interpreted in homicide cases?....................53 1.1.3 Women’s behaviour: is it stereotypically interpreted in rape cases? ……...................67 1.1.4 Women’s behaviour: is it stereotypically interpreted in child death cases?.................76 1.2 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………………89 Chapter Two: Using rape myth acceptance scholarship to theorise the mothering myth 2.0 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………...93 2.1 Definitions…………………………………………………………………………………….98 2.1.1 Defining stereotypes………………………………………………………………..…99 2.1.2 Rape myths: definitions, issues and relevance to child death cases…………………103 2.1.3 Defining attitudes to rape……………………………………………………………107 2.1.4 Stereotypes, myths and attitudes in child death cases……………………………….110 vii 2.2 Why are stereotypes or myths used?........................................................................................113 2.3 Mothering: ideology and discourse……………………………………………………..........119 2.3.1 An alternative discourse of mothering…………………………………………..........125 2.3.2 Mothering and beliefs…………………………………………………………….......128 2.3.3 - Altruism…………………………………………………………………………..…130 2.3.4 - Bonding……………………………………………………………………………..131 2.3.5 - Childcare…………………………………………………………………………....132 2.4 Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………………....134 Chapter Three: Maternal behaviours in child death cases: indicative of guilt or mothering myths? 3.0 Introduction………………………………………………………………………………….137 3.1 Mothering myths……………………………………………………………………………..140 3.1.1 Is alcohol dependency indicative of guilt?...................................................................142 3.1.2 Are emotional over reactions indicative of guilt?........................................................145 3.1.3 Is failing to use an apnoea monitor indicative of guilt?...............................................151 3.1.4 Is not calling for an ambulance supportive of guilt?....................................................155 3.1.5 Does maternal mental ill health indicate guilt?............................................................165 3.1.6 Is attention seeking behaviour indicative of guilt?.......................................................171 3.1.7 Does evidence of behaviour indicate guilt?.................................................................176 3.2 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………………179 Chapter Four: Admissibility of maternal behaviour evidence: influenced by mothering myths? 4.0 Introduction………………………………………………………………………………….181 4.1 Which factors influence the admissibility of behaviour evidence?.........................................182 4.2 Do rape myths influence the admissibility of behaviour evidence in rape trials?....................192 4.2.1 Bad character and similar fact evidence………………………………………….......195 4.2.2 S 278 CCC and personal records……………………………………………………..198 4.2.3 Hearsay rule and the late complaint………………………………………………..…199 viii 4.3 Do mothering myths influence the admissibility of maternal behaviour in child death cases? 200 4.3.1 Similar Fact evidence, common sense and multiple child deaths…………………….201 4.3.2 Section 78 and alcohol dependency…………………………………………………..209 4.3.3 Hearsay and mothering capability……………………………………………………..211 4.3.4 Opinion and witness statements……………………………………………………….212 4.4 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………….……219 Chapter Five: Jury decisions in child death trials: influenced by mothering myths? 5.0 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………….223 5.1 Judicial directions: purpose and influences?..............................................................................224 5.1.1 Judicial directions in child death cases………………………………………………..232 5.1.2 Judicial directions: influenced by defence counsel?......................................................234 5.1.3 Judicial directions: influenced by judicial deference to experts?..................................238 5.1.4 Judicial directions: influenced by expert’s gendered thinking?.....................................240 5.1.5 Judicial directions: influenced by judicial gendered thinking or mothering myths?......242 5.1.6 Judicial directions, rape myths and rape trials…………………………………………246 5.2 Jury decision making: what are the influences?.........................................................................249 5.2.1 Jury decision-making: influenced by judicial directions?..............................................255 5.2.2 Jury decision-making: influenced by juror deference?..................................................257 5.2.3 Jury decision-making: influenced by mothering myths?...............................................260 5.2.4 Jury decisions: influenced by the media?.......................................................................261 5.3 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………………..262 Chapter Six: Mothering myths: countering the consequences 6.0 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………267 6.1 Consequences for mothers: do mothering myths matter?..........................................................272 6.1.1 Normal consequences of punishment………………………………………………….276 6.1.2 Additional consequences of punishment………………………………………………278 ix 6.2 Mock juror rape trials and behavioural cues…………………………………………………..285 6.3 Countering juror reactions to behavioural cues in child death cases………………………….292 6.3.1 Judicial directions……………………………………………………………………..299 6.3.2 Trial management……………………………………………………………………..300 6.3.3 Circumstantial evidence……………………………………………………………….301 6.3.4
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 2 International Perspectives on Wrongful
    CHAPTER 2 INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVES ON WRONGFUL CONVICTION 2.1 Introduction Judicial Error or miscarriage of justice will ―invariably identify at least some element of an earlier conviction as a mistake: whether evidential, procedural or material irregularity‖. - Edmond73 Wrongful conviction, as a major concern, was recognized initially in the United States beginning in the early 1930s. The subject of wrongful conviction caught the public and scholarly attention primarily based on individual cases in the U.S.; including cases like the ―Dreyfus affair in the nineteenth century, the infamous case of the ‗Scottsboro boys‘ in te 1920s, the case of Randall Dale Adams, Sam Sheppard case, the ‗Birmingham Six‘ case and the wrongful conviction of Michael and Lindy Chamberlain for the death of their daughter in Australia‖74 These cases had attracted much public attention due to the injustice suffered by the innocents and their families. Several books, article and research papers focussed on these cases, providing reasons and suggestions for the same. This led to exonerations of most of the cases that came under media limelight, where the jury was compelled to reconsider the facts and decide the case thoughtfully based on correct evidence. Most of the people who got exonerated, were sentenced to death. The exoneration of the wrongfully convicted individuals was, indeed, the major factor for identification of wrongful conviction as an impediment to criminal justice system. Numerous reasons can be attributed to the exonerations of individuals. The progress and development made in the field of forensic science such as the DNA testing of the evidence has contributed immensely to the convictions being overturned.
    [Show full text]
  • A Critical Analysis of Medical Opinion Evidence in Child Homicide Cases
    A critical analysis of medical opinion evidence in child homicide cases Sharmila Betts B.A. (Hons.), University of Sydney, 1985 M. Psychol., University of Sydney, 1987 A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Law, The University of New South Wales (Sydney). i ii iii Acknowledgements No way of thinking or doing, however ancient, can be trusted without proof. Henry David Thoreau I am a Clinical Psychologist practicing since 1987. My time at a tertiary level Child Protection Team at The Sydney Children’s Hospital, Randwick, Australia brought to my attention the pivotal role of medical opinion evidence in establishing how children sustained injuries, which were sometimes fatal. This thesis began in a Department of Psychology, but I transferred to a Law Faculty. Though I am not a lawyer, the thesis endeavours to examine medico-legal and psychological aspects of sudden unexplained infant deaths. It sets itself the task of addressing important questions requiring rigorous and critical analysis to ensure accuracy and justice is achieved. I hope my thesis sheds light on this complex issue. Gary Edmond has been a mentor, guide and staunch critic. I am deeply grateful that he trusted a novice to navigate this perplexing field of inquiry. Emma Cunliffe has provided clarity in an area shrouded in uncertainty. Their patience, support and faith have enabled me to crystalise and formulate my fledgling insights into a dissertation. I am indebted to Natalie Tzovaras, Monique Ross, Katie Poidomani, and Janet Willinge for their administrative support. My husband, Grant, posed the question that started my journey - ‘how do doctors know the injuries were deliberately inflicted?’ Through my many doubts and fears, he iv maintained a trust in my ability to address this question and helped me return time and again to the seemingly overwhelming task before me.
    [Show full text]
  • Principles of Administrative Law 1
    CP Cavendish Publishing Limited London • Sydney EDITORIAL ADVISORY BOARD PRINCIPLES OF LAW SERIES Professor Paul Dobson Visiting Professor at Anglia Polytechnic University Professor Nigel Gravells Professor of English Law, Nottingham University Professor Phillip Kenny Professor and Head of the Law School, Northumbria University Professor Richard Kidner Professor and Head of the Law Department, University of Wales, Aberystwyth In order to ensure that the material presented by each title maintains the necessary balance between thoroughness in content and accessibility in arrangement, each title in the series has been read and approved by an independent specialist under the aegis of the Editorial Board. The Editorial Board oversees the development of the series as a whole, ensuring a conformity in all these vital aspects. David Stott, LLB, LLM Deputy Head, Anglia Law School Anglia Polytechnic University Alexandra Felix, LLB, LLM Lecturer in Law, Anglia Law School Anglia Polytechnic University CP Cavendish Publishing Limited London • Sydney First published in Great Britain 1997 by Cavendish Publishing Limited, The Glass House, Wharton Street, London WC1X 9PX. Telephone: 0171-278 8000 Facsimile: 0171-278 8080 e-mail: [email protected] Visit our Home Page on http://www.cavendishpublishing.com © Stott, D and Felix, A 1997 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning or otherwise, except under the terms of the Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or under the terms of a licence issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London W1P 9HE, UK, without the permission in writing of the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Medicine, Medea and the Media
    Medicine, Medea and the Media: The Rise and Fall of Roy Meadow Medicine, Medea and the Media: The Rise and Fall of Roy Meadow Nicola Elizabeth Goc BA Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, University of Tasmania March 2007 Declaration: This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for a degree or diploma by the University or any other institution, except by way of background information and duly acknowledged in the thesis, and to the best of the candidate's knowledge and belief no material previously published or written by another person except where due acknowledgement is made in the text of the thesis, nor does the thesis contain any material that infringers copyright. c..--4EK-- Statement of Access: This thesis may not be made available for loan or copying until two years after the date below. After this date this thesis may be made available for loan and limited copying in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968 and with due acknowledgement to the author. ___,cA""'-----!f'-f-----c:.......-=----­ March 2007. Abstract For more than three decades eminent British paediatrician, Professor Sir Roy Meadow, was courted by the media for his startling pronouncements on maternal child murder and abuse, including his now infamous Meadow's Law and his creation ofMunchausen Syndrome by Proxy. His compelling evidence made headline news in the trials of several women, including Sally Clark, Donna Anthony, Angela Cannings and Trupti Patel. Journalists, however, persistently failed to investigate Meadow's potent claims, using the eminent paediatrician as a primary source to create highly newsworthy news narratives.
    [Show full text]
  • Bad Medicine: Parents, the State, and the Charge of “Medical Child Abuse”
    Bad Medicine: Parents, the State, and the Charge of “Medical Child Abuse” ∗ Maxine Eichner † Doctors and hospitals have begun to level a new charge — “medical child abuse” (MCA) — against parents who, they say, get unnecessary medical treatment for their kids. The fact that this treatment has been ordered by other doctors does not protect parents from these accusations. Child protection officials have generally supported the accusing doctors in these charges, threatening parents with loss of custody, removing children from their homes, and even sometimes charging parents criminally for this asserted overtreatment. Judges, too, have largely treated such charges as credible claims of child abuse. ∗ Copyright © 2016 Maxine Eichner. Graham Kenan Distinguished Professor of Law, University of North Carolina School of Law; J.D., Ph.D. I am grateful for comments from and conversations with an interdisciplinary group of readers: Alexa Chew, J.D.; Christine Cox, J.D.; Hannah Eichner; Keith Findley, J.D.; Victor Flatt, J.D.; Michael Freeman, M.D., Ph.D., M.P.H.; Steven Gabaeff, M.D.; Mark Graber, M.D.; Heidi Harkins, Ph.D.; Clare Huntington, J.D.; Diana Rugh Johnson, J.D.; Joan Krause, J.D.; Michael Laposata, M.D., Ph.D.; Holning Lau, J.D.; Sue Luttner; Beth Maloney, J.D.; Loren Pankratz, Ph.D.; Maya Manian, J.D.; Rachel Rebouche, J.D.; Diane Redleaf, J.D.; Maria Savasta-Kennedy, J.D.; Richard Saver, J.D.; Jessica Shriver, M.A., M.S.; Adam Stein, J.D.; Eric Stein, J.D.; Beat Steiner, M.D., M.P.H.; Judy Stone, M.D.; Deborah Tuerkheimer, J.D.; Catherine Volponi, J.D; and Deborah Weissman, J.D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Criminal Justice Response to Women Who Kill an Interview with Helena Kennedy Sheila Quaid and Catherine Itzin Introduction
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Sunderland University Institutional Repository The criminal justice response to women who kill An interview with Helena Kennedy Sheila Quaid and Catherine Itzin Introduction This chapter is based on an interview with Helena Kennedy QC by Catherine Itzin. It has been edited into the form of a narrative, covering a range of issues relating to women and the criminal justice system, and in particular explores the question of 'Why do women kill?'. In Helena Kennedy's experience of defending women, she asserts that most women kill in desperation, in self... defence or in the defence of their children. Women's experience of violence and escape from violence has received much critical comment and campaigning for law reform over the past few years and some cases such as Sara Thornton, Kiranjit Ahluwalia and Emma Humphreys have achieved a high public profile as campaigners have fought for their release from life sentences. All three women had sustained years of violence and abuse from their partners and had killed in their attempts to stop the violence. Who women kill Women are rarely involved in serial killing and they almost never go out and plan the anonymous killing of a victim with whom who they have no connection at all. For the most part women kill people they know and primarily these people are men. They kill within the domestic arena: they kill their husbands, their lovers, their boyfriends and sometimes they kill their children. Occasion... ally it might stretch beyond the domestic parameter, but the numbers are incredibly small, and when women kill it is when something is going very wrong with their domestic environment.
    [Show full text]
  • PROVOCATION’: READRESSING the LANDMARK THAT OUTFLANKED the LAW of MURDER – a COMMENT on ‘REGINA V
    Indian Journal of Legal Research & Advancements Volume 1 Issue 1, October 2020 EXPATIATION OF ‘PROVOCATION’: READRESSING THE LANDMARK THAT OUTFLANKED THE LAW OF MURDER – A COMMENT ON ‘REGINA v. Kiranjit Ahluwalia’ Ritik Gupta* ABSTRACT Metaphorically, understanding with practicality makes the concept more explicable, and the same did the case of Regina v. Kiranjit Ahluwalia (“Ahluwalia”) on which the author will be commenting in this piece. Firstly, he will expound that how this judgment broadened the compass of ‘provocation’ and influenced the whole world through a new facet respecting domestic violence and then how the three appeals performed the interrogator, that grilled the legitimacy of directions placed in the precedents in conformance with the contemporary law. Secondly, he will scrutinise the fluctuations escorted due to the inducement of this watershed moment to statues and acts and why those became desiderata to bring into effect. Thirdly, he will draw a distinction in the context of ‘provocation’ and ‘diminished responsibility’ amongst English and Indian law, and discourse that why the latter needs an overhaul. Further, he will tag the tribulations which women have to bear when the law does not perceive the circumstance in all facets. Lastly, he will conclude in a concise way and portray the remainder. TABLE OF CONTENTS * The author is a student of B.A. LL.B. (Hons.) at Fairfield Institute of Management and Technology, GGSIP University, New Delhi. He may be reached at [email protected]. The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the institution’s with which the author is affiliated.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction Several High‐Profile Criminal Cases, Such As Those Of
    Introduction Several high‐profile criminal cases, such as those of Sally Clark, Angela Cannings, Trupti Patel and Donna Anthony – all wrongly convicted of the murder of their children on the basis of flawed expert evidence – have raised serious questions about the use, nature and quality of expert evidence in such cases. As well as the injustice and suffering inflicted on innocent families, the publicity surrounding these cases has seriously undermined public confidence in the criminal justice system. Further, this publicity has deterred suitably qualified clinicians, already in short supply, from acting as expert witnesses. In the wake of these cases, the government commissioned the Chief Medical Officer, Sir Liam Donaldson, to produce proposals for the reform of expert evidence in family law cases more generally. Such reform was long overdue since there were already serious concerns about unacceptable delays in cases where experts were instructed. These delays were attributed partly to a significant increase in the number of experts being instructed, their limited availability for hearings and the late submission of reports to the court. Such issues are addressed in the Report from Sir Liam Donaldson on this issue, which concentrates on public law proceedings in Children Act cases and makes 16 proposals for reform. As the Report makes clear, the issues raised are relevant to medical evidence in both criminal and Children Act cases. Research cited in the report shows that there have been surprisingly few instances in family law cases where the evidence of expert witnesses has been disputed. The Minister for Children had required local authorities to review cases of children who were the subject of care proceedings where certain expert evidence was likely to have had a significant bearing upon the decisions of the courts.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender Representations in Women's Cinema of the South Asian Diaspora
    Universidad de Salamanca Facultad de Filología / Departamento de Filología Inglesa HYBRID CINEMAS AND NARRATIVES: GENDER REPRESENTATIONS IN WOMEN’S CINEMA OF THE SOUTH ASIAN DIASPORA Tesis Doctoral Jorge Diego Sánchez Directora: Olga Barrios Herrero 2015 © Photograph by Sohini Roychowdhury at Anjali Basu’s Wedding Ceremony (Kolkata, India), 2015. UNIVERSIDAD DE SALAMANCA FACULTAD DE FILOLOGÍA DEPARTAMENTO DE FILOLOGÍA INGLESA HYBRID CINEMAS AND NARRATIVES: GENDER REPRESENTATIONS IN WOMEN’S CINEMA OF THE SOUTH ASIAN DIASPORA Tesis para optar al grado de doctor presentada por Jorge Diego Sánchez Directora: Olga Barrios Herrero V°B° Olga Barrios Herrero Jorge Diego Sánchez Salamanca, 2015 1 INDEX INDEX Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ……………………………………………………………… 5 INTRODUCTION ……………………………………………………………………….. 13 CHAPTER I THE MANY SOUTH ASIAS OF THE MIND: HISTORY OF THE SOUTH ASIAN DIASPORA …………………………………………………………………..………….. 27 1- Inwards Flight to the History of the South Asian Subcontinent ………………………. 32 1.1 The Indian Palimpsest. A Fractal Overview of the Historical Confrontations in the South Asian Subcontinent until the Establishment of the British Raj ………………………………………………….. 33 1.2 The Jewel of the Crown: the Colonial Encounter as the End Of the Integrating Diversity and the Beginning of a Categorising Society ……………………………………………………………… 38 1.3 The Construction of the Indian National Identity as a Postcolonial Abstraction: the Partition of the Religious, Linguistic and Social Distinctiveness ………………………………………………………….…. 43 2- Outwards Flight of South Asian Cultures: The Many Indian Diasporas …………….... 49 2.1 Raw Materials and Peoples: Indian Diaspora to the UK, Caribbean and East and South Africa during Colonial Times ……………..…….. 50 A. Arriving at the British Metropolis: Cotton, Labour Force and Colonising Education (1765 – 1947) …………………….. 51 B. Working for the Empire: Indentured Indian Diaspora in the Caribbean (1838 – 1917) …………………….….
    [Show full text]
  • School of Finance & Law Working Paper Series the Radical
    School of Finance & Law Working Paper Series The Radical Potentialities of Biographical Methods for Making Difference(s) Visible by Elizabeth Mytton Bournemouth University No. 5. 1997 Bournemouth University, School of Finance & Law (Department of Accounting & Finance), Talbot Campus, Fern Barrow, Poole, Dorset. BH12 5BB Published 1997 by the School of Finance and Law, Bournemouth University, Talbot Campus, Fern Barrow, Poole, Dorset, BH12 5BB. For further details contact: Elizabeth Mytton School of Finance & Law Bournemouth University Fern Barrow Poole, BH12 5BB United Kingdom Tel: (00)- 01202 595206 Fax: (00)-1202-595261 Email: [email protected] ISBN 1-85899-043-2 Copyright is held by the individual authors. A catalogue record for this publication is available from the British Library. Acknowledgements The author would like to thank Kerry Howell for his valuable guidance and Geoff Willcocks for the recognition of pedagogic studies and research. [The usual disclaimer applies.] For further information on the series, contact K. Howell, School of Finance & Law, Bournemouth University. The Radical Potentialities of Biographical Methods for Making Difference(s) Visible by Elizabeth Mytton Senior Lecturer School of Finance & Law Bournemouth University November 1997 The common law of England has been laboriously built up by a mythical figure - the figure of the reasonable man. (Herbert, Uncommon Law 1935) Abstract This paper is part of work in progress which explores the use of biographical methods and the radical potentialities there may be for making difference(s) visible. 'Radical potentialities' refers to the extent to which there are opportunities to effect change. This paper is primarily concerned with exploring prevailing narratives which generate epistemological assumptions creating a conceptual framework within which the law of provocation as it relates to women who kill their partners operates.
    [Show full text]
  • WHO KILL: How the State Criminalises Women We Might Otherwise Be Burying TABLE of CONTENTS
    WOMEN WHO KILL: how the state criminalises women we might otherwise be burying TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements 1 About the Contributors 2-3 Foreword by Harriet Wistrich, Director 4-6 Summary of Key Findings 7-12 1. Lack of protection from domestic abuse: triggers to women’s lethal violence 7 2. First responders when women kill 8 3. Court proceedings 8 4. Additional challenges 10 5. Expert evidence 11 6. After conviction 11 Introduction 13-17 The legal framework in England and Wales 15 Homicide in the context of intimate partner relationships 17 Methodology 18-21 Primary data collection 19 Women participants 20 Secondary data analysis 20 Study limitations 21 Key Findings: Prevalence and criminal justice outcomes for women 22-23 Key Findings: Criminal justice responses to women who kill 24-96 1. Lack of protection from domestic abuse: triggers to women’s lethal violence 24 2. First responders when women kill 33 3. Court proceedings 43 4. Additional challenges 73 5. Expert evidence 83 6. After conviction 90 TABLE OF CONTENTS CONT. Conclusion and Recommendations 97-106 Conclusion 97 Recommendations 98 1. Systemic change to address triggers to women’s lethal violence 98 2. When women kill: early stages of the criminal justice process 99 3. Court proceedings 101 4. Additional challenges 102 5. Expert evidence 102 6. After conviction 103 7. Further recommendations 105 8. Recommendations for further research 106 Appendix 1: Detailed methodology 107-118 Appendix 2: The intersection of domestic abuse, race and culture in cases involving Black and minority ethnic women in the criminal justice system 119-128 Appendix 3: Media analysis - women who kill 129-137 Appendix 4: The legal framework surrounding cases of women who kill 138-143 Endnotes 144-149 WOMEN WHO KILL: how the state criminalises women we might otherwise be burying Acknowledgements Research has been coordinated and written by Sophie Howes, with input from Helen Easton, Harriet Wistrich, Katy Swaine Williams, Clare Wade QC, Pragna Patel and Julie Bindel, Nic Mainwood, Hannana Siddiqui.
    [Show full text]
  • Forensics Under Fire.Pdf
    Prelims.qxd 11/14/07 2:28 PM Page i Forensics under Fire Prelims.qxd 11/14/07 2:28 PM Page ii Prelims.qxd 11/14/07 2:28 PM Page iii ≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈ Forensics under Fire Are Bad Science and Dueling Experts Corrupting Criminal Justice? JIM FISHER ≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈ RUTGERS UNIVERSITY PRESS NEW BRUNSWICK, NEW JERSEY, AND LONDON Prelims.qxd 11/14/07 2:28 PM Page iv LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOGING-IN-PUBLICATION DATA Fisher, Jim, – Forensics under fire : are bad science and dueling experts corrupting criminal justice? / Jim Fisher. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN ‒‒‒‒ (hardcover : alk. paper) . Criminal investigation—United States. Crime scene searches—United States. Forensic sciences—United States. Evidence, Criminal—United States I. Title. HV.F .—dc CIP A British Cataloging-in-Publication record for this book is available from the British Library. Copyright © by Jim Fisher All rights reserved No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission from the publisher. Please contact Rutgers University Press, Joyce Kilmer Avenue, Piscataway, NJ –. The only exception to this prohibition is “fair use” as defined by U.S. copyright law. Visit our Web site: http://rutgerspress.rutgers.edu Manufactured in the United States of America Prelims.qxd 11/14/07 2:28 PM Page v It is through clues that we form our opinion about the facts of a case. There is only one alternative: to catch the culprit red-handed. —Theodore Reik, The Compulsion to Confess, 1959 Clues are tangible signs which prove—or seem to prove—that no crime can be committed by thought only and that we live in a world regulated by mechanical laws.
    [Show full text]