Judicial Independence in Sri Lanka
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Emergency Rule and Authoritarianism in Republican Sri Lanka
6 An Eager Embrace: Emergency Rule and Authoritarianism in Republican Sri Lanka Deepika Udagama Introduction Much of Sri Lanka’s post-independence period has seen governance under states of emergency. The invocation of the Public Security Ordinance (PSO)1 by successive governments was a common feature of political life and, indeed, an integral aspect of the political culture of the republic. Several generations of Sri Lankans have grown up and have been socialised into political and public life in an environment fashioned by states of exception replete with attendant symbols and imagery. Images of police with automatic weapons, military check-points, barbed wire, lengthy periods of detention (often administrative detention) mainly of the political ‘other’, the trauma of political violence and the ever- present sense of fear became the ‘normal’. The state of exception has become the norm in Sri Lanka from the 1970s onwards. The permanency of the state of exception was further consolidated when the Prevention of Terrorism (Temporary Provisions) Act, No. 48 of 1979 (PTA) was converted into a permanent law in 1982.2 Although not an emergency regulation, the PTA conferred extraordinary powers on the executive branch (e.g. powers of arrest and detention) to deal with what it recognised as acts of terrorism. That in combination with the ever-present emergency powers, which were sanctioned by the Constitution, provided a formidable legal framework to entrench the state of exception. The omnipotence of the executive presidency created by the second republican constitution (1978) amplified the potency of those exceptional powers. Sri Lanka had become the quintessential ‘National Security State’, the vestiges of which have not been shaken off even five The author wishes to thank Ms. -
UN DDR in an Era of Violent Extremism: Is It Fit for Purpose?
1 UN DDR in an Era of Violent Extremism: Is It Fit for Purpose? Edited by James Cockayne and Siobhan O’Neil ISBN: 978-0-692-45637-8 © United Nations University, 2015 COVER MILITIA MEMBER IN KISMAAYO, SOMALIA. UN PHOTO/STUART PRICE UN DDR in an Era of Violent Extremism: Is It Fit for Purpose? Edited by James Cockayne and Siobhan O’Neil Contents About this Collection 2 Acknowledgments 3 About the Authors 4 Preface 7 Executive Summary 10 Chapter 1 Introduction 14 Introduction 15 1. The changing conflict environment 16 2. The changing role of DDR in UN peace operations 22 3. A precarious peace operations environment 28 4. Building new DDR solutions 31 Clarifying DDR’s purpose in contemporary contexts 34 Chapter 2 DDR in the Context of Offensive Military Operations, Counterterrorism, CVE and Non-Permissive Environments 36 Introduction 37 The purpose and design of DDR 40 The new challenging context 41 New and old challenges for DDR in the current context 45 Conclusion and Policy Implications 59 Chapter 3 The Blue Flag in Grey Zones: Exploring the relationships between Countering Violent Extremism (CVE) and Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration (DDR) in UN field operations 62 Introduction 63 The emergence and evolution of CVE and terrorist rehabilitation efforts 65 Cross Learning? 66 What implications for the UN? 74 Recommendations 77 Conclusion 79 Chapter 4 DDR and Detention in UN Peace Operations 80 Introduction 81 DDR and Detention 82 Peace operations detention scenarios 87 Challenges facing the UN 88 Risks posed by UN involvement -
Downloaded from Brill.Com10/09/2021 11:59:10AM Via Free Access 234 ASIAN YEARBOOK of INTERNATIONAL LA W
STATE PRACTICE OF ASIAN COUNTRIES IN THE FIELD OF INTERNATIONAL LAW' INDIA JUDICIAL DECISIONS" Sovereign immunity; Shipping line as department of the Government of the German Democratic Republic "exercising the rights of a legal entity"; Absence of consent of Government of India to sue pursuant to section 86(2)(b) of the Indian Civil Procedure Code of 1908; Held, consent of the Central Government a mandatory condition precedent. Supreme Court, 25 November 1993 AIR 1994 S.C. 516 M.M. PUNCHHI and N.P. SINGH, H. VEB. DEUTFRACHT SEEREEDEREI ROSTOCK (D.S.R. LINES) - Appellant v. NEW CENTRAL JUTE MILLS CO.LTD. & ANOTHER - Respondents The case came before the Supreme Court of India, in the form of Civil Appeal No. 4208 of 1983 on adecision by the Calcutta High Court. The plaintiff-respondent flled a suit for a decree for Rs. 240,000 c1aiming that the defendant-appellant (D.S.R. Lines) sold them damaged goods. D.S.R. Lines was a company "incorporated under the appropriate laws of ... West [sie] Germany" and was "carrying on its business in West [sie] Germany as also at Calcutta" . The defendant took objection and argued that it was a department and/or agent and/or instrumentality of the Government of the German Democratic • Edited by Ko Swan Sik, General Editor . •• Contributed by V.S. MANI, LUTHER RANGREJI and GoVINDRAJ G. HEGDE, lawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi. Asian Yearbook of International Law, Volume 5 (Ko Swan Sik et al., eds.; 90-411-0375-9 © 1997 Kluwer Law International; printed in the Netherlands), pp. 233-291 233 Ko Swan Sik, M.C.W. -
Bathiudeen Ordered to Reforest Kallaru at Own Cost
HIGHLIGHTS TUESDAY 17 november 2020 Battling Smog LATEST EDITION to Prevent VOL: 09/276 PRICE : Rs 30.00 Covid Pandemic Spread In Sports Poor progress PAGE A6 results in two athletes losing IOC Remittances funding continue Two track and field athletes, Vidusha Lakshani and Gayanthika to rise Abeyrathne, have been removed from the Sri Lanka’s... A16 PAGE B11 COVID-19 Death Review Committee Bathiudeen Ordered hands over report Three deaths reported yesterday to Reforest Kallaru BY DILANTHI JAYAMANNE, GAGANI WEERAKOON, METHMALIE DISSANAYAKE AND BUDDHIKA SAMARAWEERA The COVID-19 death toll increased to 61 with the at Own Cost deaths of three persons which included an 84- year- old woman from Moratuwa, the Government Information Department, quoting the Director Court rules Forest Conservation Polluter pays General Health Services said. The Department said that the 84-year old from Ordinance contravened principle applied Moratuwa had died at her home due to complications from a diabetic condition arising as a result of COVID-19. The deaths also included that of a 70-year-old CG of Forests to Cost to be paid man from Colombo 10 who had been admitted to the National Institute of Infectious Diseases (NIID). The calculate cost and within two months cause of death was due to a chronic kidney disease aggravated by COVID-19, and a 75-year-old man from Colombo 13 who had died while being admitted inform Bathiudeen of judgment to the National Hospital due to complications arising from diabetes and congenital heart disease which BY FAADHILA THASSIM AND EUNICE Forest Conservation Ordinance, is in was heightened by COVID-19. -
International Human Rights Instruments and Several Optional Protocols
UNITED NATIONS HRI International Distr. Human Rights GENERAL Instruments HRI/CORE/LKA/2008 23 September 2008 Original: ENGLISH CORE DOCUMENT FORMING PART OF THE REPORTS OF STATES PARTIES SRI LANKA* [23 April 2008] * In accordance with the information transmitted to States parties regarding the processing of their reports, the present document was not edited before being sent to the United Nations translation services. GE.08-44221 (E) 221008 HRI/CORE/LKA/2008 page 2 CONTENTS Chapter Paragraphs Page I. GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE STATE OF SRI LANKA ................................................................................... 1 - 110 3 A. History, geography, demography, economy, government, social infrastructure, post-tsunami reconstruction ...................... 1 - 59 3 B. Constitutional, political and legal structure of the State ............. 60 - 110 14 II. GENERAL FRAMEWORK FOR THE PROMOTION AND PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS ............................................... 111 - 220 23 A. Acceptance of international human rights norms ....................... 111 - 118 23 B. Legal framework for the protection of human rights at the national level ..................................................................... 119 - 134 26 C. Framework within which human rights are promoted at the national level ..................................................................... 135 29 D. Education programmes and public information .......................... 193 - 220 43 III. INFORMATION ON NON-DISCRIMINATION AND EQUALITY AND EFFECTIVE REMEDIES -
Security Sector Reform in Challenging Environments
Hans Born and Albrecht Schnabel (Eds) Security Sector Reform in Challenging Environments Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF) LIT Security Sector Reform in Challenging Environments edited by Hans Born and Albrecht Schnabel LIT (Bibliographic information here) Contents Preface vii Acknowledgements ix Abbreviations xi Part I: Introduction 1 Ideal Requirements versus Real Environments in Security 3 Sector Reform Albrecht Schnabel Part II: Learning from Challenging SSR Environments 2 Security Sector Reform in the Central African Republic 39 Boubacar N’Diaye 3 Limited Security Sector Reform in Colombia 69 Wolf Grabendorff 4 Security Sector Reform in the DRC: Forward to the Past 89 Caty Clément 5 Impatient Reformers and Reignited Conflicts: The Case 119 of Georgia Duncan Hiscock 6 Morocco: Reforms in the Security Sector But No ‘SSR’ 143 Hanspeter Mattes 7 Security Sector Reform in Nepal: Challenges and 165 Opportunities Bishnu Raj Upreti and Peter Vanhoutte 8 Post-Conflict Reconstruction and Security Sector Reform 189 in Sri Lanka Eleanor Pavey and Chris Smith 9 A Lot of Talk But Not a Lot of Action: The Difficulty of 213 Implementing SSR in Timor-Leste Gordon Peake Part III: Conclusion 10 Security Sector Reform in Challenging Environments: 241 Insights from Comparative Analysis Hans Born List of Contributors 267 About DCAF 269 Preface The Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF) is an international foundation whose mission is to assist the international community in promoting good governance and reform of the security sector. Beyond a range of publications linked to its activities, each year DCAF dedicates one book to a topic that is of particular relevance to its research and operational activities. -
Perspectices on Involving Non-State and Customary Actors in Justice
Perspectives on Involving Non-State and Customary Actors in Justice and Security Reform Editors: Peter Albrecht Helene Maria Kyed Deborah Isser Erica Harper Perspectives on Involving Non-State and Customary Actors in Justice and Security Reform Editors: Peter Albrecht Helene Maria Kyed Deborah Isser Erica Harper Perspectives on Involving Non-State and Customary Actors in Justice and Security Reform Copyright © International Development Law Organization 2011 International Development Law Organization (IDLO) IDLO is an intergovernmental organization that promotes legal, regulatory and institutional reform to advance economic and social development in transitional and developing countries. Founded in 1983 and one of the leaders in rule of law assistance, IDLO's comprehensive approach achieves enduring results by mobilizing stakeholders at all levels of society to drive institutional change. Because IDLO wields no political agenda and has deep expertise in different legal systems and emerging global issues, people and interest groups of diverse backgrounds trust IDLO. It has direct access to government leaders, institutions and multilateral organizations in developing countries, including lawyers, jurists, policymakers, advocates, academics and civil society representatives. Among its activities, IDLO conducts timely, focused and comprehensive research in areas related to sustainable development in the legal, regulatory, and justice sectors. Through such research, IDLO seeks to contribute to existing Practice and scholarship on priority legal issues, and to serve as a conduit for the global exchange of ideas, best practices and lessons learned. IDLO produces a variety of professional legal tools covering interdisciplinary thematic and regional issues; these include book series, country studies, research reports, policy papers, training handbooks, glossaries and benchbooks. -
Sri Lanka's Constitution of 1978 with Amendments Through 2015
PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:49 constituteproject.org Sri Lanka's Constitution of 1978 with Amendments through 2015 Subsequently amended This complete constitution has been generated from excerpts of texts from the repository of the Comparative Constitutions Project, and distributed on constituteproject.org. constituteproject.org PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:49 Table of contents Preamble . 11 CHAPTER I: THE PEOPLE, THE STATE AND SOVEREIGNTY . 11 1. The State . 11 2. Unitary State . 11 3. Sovereignty of the People . 12 4. Exercise of Sovereignty . 12 5. Territory of the Republic . 12 6. The National Flag . 12 7. The National Anthem . 13 8. The National Day . 13 CHAPTER II: BUDDHISM . 13 CHAPTER III: FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS . 13 10. Freedom of thought, conscience and religion . 13 11. Freedom from torture . 13 12. Right to equality . 13 13. Freedom from arbitrary arrest, detention and punishment, and prohibition of retrospective penal legislation . 14 14. Freedom of speech, assembly, association, occupation, movement etc . 14 14A. Right of access to information . 15 15. Restrictions on fundamental rights . 16 16. Existing written law and unwritten law to continue in force . 16 17. Remedy for the infringement of fundamental rights by executive action . 17 CHAPTER IV: LANGUAGE . 17 18. Official Language . 17 19. National Languages . 17 20. Use of National Languages in Parliament, Provincial Councils and Local Authorities . 17 21. Medium of instruction . 17 22. Languages of Administration . 18 23. Language of Legislation . 19 24. Languages of the courts . 20 25. Provision for adequate facilities for use of languages provided for in this Chapter . 20 25A. Provision of any law inconsistent with this Chapter deemed to be repealed . -
Sri Lanka's Constitution of 1978 with Amendments Through 2010
PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:49 constituteproject.org Sri Lanka's Constitution of 1978 with Amendments through 2010 This complete constitution has been generated from excerpts of texts from the repository of the Comparative Constitutions Project, and distributed on constituteproject.org. constituteproject.org PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:49 Table of contents Preamble . 10 CHAPTER I: THE PEOPLE, THE STATE AND SOVEREIGNTY . 10 1. The State . 10 2. Unitary State . 10 3. Sovereignty of the People . 11 4. Exercise of Sovereignty . 11 5. Territory of the Republic . 11 6. The National Flag . 11 7. The National Anthem . 12 8. The National Day . 12 CHAPTER II: BUDDHISM . 12 CHAPTER III: FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS . 12 10. Freedom of thought, conscience and religion . 12 11. Freedom from torture . 12 12. Right to equality . 12 13. Freedom from arbitrary arrest, detention and punishment, and prohibition of retrospective penal legislation . 13 14. Freedom of speech, assembly, association, occupation, movement etc . 13 15. Restrictions on fundamental rights . 14 16. Existing written law and unwritten law to continue in force . 15 17. Remedy for the infringement of fundamental rights by executive action . 15 CHAPTER IV: LANGUAGE . 15 18. Official Language . 15 19. National Languages . 15 20. Use of National Languages in Parliament, Provincial Councils and Local Authorities . 16 21. Medium of instruction . 16 22. Languages of Administration . 16 23. Language of Legislation . 17 24. Languages of the courts . 18 25. Provision for adequate facilities for use of languages provided for in this Chapter . 19 25A. Provision of any law inconsistent with this Chapter deemed to be repealed . -
PDF of Code As Amended to Act No. 11 of 2018
CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ACT Arrangement of Sections 1. Short title. PART I CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY 2. Interpretation. 3. Words referring to acts include illegal omissions. 4. Powers, jurisdiction rights and duties of certain officers. 5. Trial of offences under Penal Code and other laws. 6. Saving of powers of Supreme Court, Court of Appeal and Attorney-General. 7. Cases not provided for. PART II CHAPTER II POWERS OF CRIMINAL COURTS 8. Power of Supreme Court and Court of Appeal to inspect courts of first instance. 9. Criminal summary jurisdiction of Magistrates’ Courts. 10. Offences under Penal code. 11. Offences under other laws. 12. High Court to try cases only upon indictment. 13. Sentence which High Court may impose. 14. Sentence which a Magistrate’s Court may impose. 15. — 16. Sentence in case of conviction for several offences at one trial. B—PAYMENTS OF COSTS AND COMPENSATION 17. Payment of costs compensation and upon acquittal. C—COMMUNITY SERVICE ORDERS 18. Community Service Orders. PART III GENERAL PROVISIONS CHAPTER III OF AID AND INFORMATION TO THE MAGISTRATES AND POLICE AND PERSONS MAKING ARRESTS 19. Public when to assist Magistrates and peace officers. 20. Aid to other than peace officers executing warrant. 21. Public to give information about certain offences. 22. Peace officer bound to report certain matters. CHAPTER IV OF ARREST, ESCAPE, AND RETAKING A—ARREST GENERALLY 23. Arrest how made. 24. Search of place entered by person sought to be arrested. 25. Procedure where ingress not obtainable. 26. Search of person in place searched under warrant. 27. Power to break open doors and windows for purposes of liberation. -
Download/36193/568706
1 Created with Print2PDF. To remove this line, buy a license at: http://www.software602.com/ 2 Created with Print2PDF. To remove this line, buy a license at: http://www.software602.com/ First Published in Sri Lanka in 2008 © Transparency International Sri Lanka # 28/1, Bullers Lane, Colombo 07 Sri Lanka. Tel : (94) 11 2501474, 2592287 Fax : (94) 112506419 E-mail : [email protected] Web :www.tisrilanka.org ISBN : 978-955-1281-22-9 Kapila Printed By : Advertising E-mail : [email protected] 3 Created with Print2PDF. To remove this line, buy a license at: http://www.software602.com/ Pages Contributors i Reviewers iii Editor’s Note v J.C. Weliamuna Highlights of Governance Issues 2007 /2 008 1 Gareesha Wirithamulla Awakening of the Sentinels: Recent Judicial Decisions Against 19 Corruption and Malpractice Thishya Weragoda Cracks in the Foundation 36 Suzie Beling Corruption and the Economy 56 Eran Wickramaratne & Nishan De Mel Governance of NGOs in Sri Lanka 87 Rukshana Nanayakkara Reforms Needed for Streamlining Financial Control and Scrutiny 101 by Parliament Wijedasa Rajapakse ú.Kldêm;s jd¾;dfjka fy<sjk zrdcH .Kka §fï j.lSïZ meyer 113 yeÍfï fÄÞka;h Ananda Dharmapriya Jayasekera Governance and Corruption Indices 129 Bettina Meier Acknowledgements 147 4 Created with Print2PDF. To remove this line, buy a license at: http://www.software602.com/ Contributors Wijedasa Rajapakse Wijedasa Rjapakse, President’s Counsel is a Member of the Global Parliamentarians against Corruption, the former Chairman of COPE, the former Chairman of the Press Council the former Chairman of People’s Bank, and the former Chairman of the Rent Board of Review. -
Declaration of Joseph Asoka Nihal De Silva in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss
Case 2:19-cv-02577-R-RAO Document 22-1 Filed 06/27/19 Page 1 of 55 Page ID #:125 1 JOHN C. ULIN (State Bar No. 165524) 2 [email protected] ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER LLP 3 777 South Figueroa Street, 44th Floor 4 Los Angeles, California 90017-5844 Telephone: (213) 243-4000 5 Facsimile: (213) 243-4199 6 Attorney for Defendant 7 Nandasena Gotabaya Rajapaksa 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION 11 12 AHIMSA WICKREMATUNGE, in her individual Case No. 2:19-cv-02577-R-RAO 13 capacity and in her capacity as the legal representative of the ESTATE OF LASANTHA Honorable Judge Manuel L. Real 14 WICKREMATUNGE, 15 DECLARATION OF JOSEPH Plaintiff, ASOKA NIHAL DE SILVA IN 16 SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT’S v. 17 MOTION TO DISMISS NANDASENA GOTABAYA RAJAPAKSA, 18 19 Defendant. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DECLARATION OF JOSEPH ASOKA NIHAL DE SILVA IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS Case 2:19-cv-02577-R-RAO Document 22-1 Filed 06/27/19 Page 2 of 55 Page ID #:126 1 I, Joseph Asoka Nihal de Silva, hereby declare as follows: 2 I. Introduction 3 1.1 I received my Bachelor of Laws Degree from the Law Faculty of the 4 University of Sri Lanka in 1971, was admitted to the bar by the Supreme Court of Sri 5 Lanka in 1972, and practiced law as an attorney-at-law of the Supreme Court. 6 1.2 I joined the Department of the Attorney-General on February 4, 1974, as a 7 State Counsel, which required that I appear as counsel for the State in civil and 8 criminal matters in both the original and appellate courts in Sri Lanka.