DOCSLIB.ORG

Spring 2008 in the City of New York

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Spring 2008 in the City of New York Columbia University SPRING 2008 in the City of New York 435 West 116th Street, Box A-2 New York, NY 10027 RETURN SERVICE REQUESTED www.law.columbia.edu/alumni Security and Liberty the balance between VigiLance & indiViduaL RightS CONSTITUTIONAL 150 YEARS: TODD STITZER ’78 LAW EXPERT Columbia Law School and the Chocolate Factory: Professor Philip Hamburger Celebrates its Sesquicentennial Four Years at the Helm Examines of Cadbury First Amendment Rights photographs by alan orling From the Dean: “ In the 150 years since our law school was founded, our graduates have provided leadership in government, the nonprofit world, and in every sector of the economy all over the world,” Dean David M. Schizer tells graduating law students during ceremonies May 22 on Columbia University’s South Field. Below he shares excerpts from his address to the Class of 2008, their parents and the members of the 50th reunion class. “Perhaps the greatest gift you have been nature, while constraining our darker living happy lives, on pursuing their given is to be born talented in a world impulses. The tragedy of humanity is dreams. This is what our legal system that values your talents. You will be that ambition and greed are such close does. But the rule of law is a precious rewarded generously — with interesting cousins. The same qualities that produce and rare condition in the world, work, respect, and financial security. life-enhancing innovations can also requiring dedicated guardians who But in a different time and place, this degenerate into chilling acts of brutality. protect and refine key institutions and might not have been true. I am convinced Hobbes was right about the state defend our ideals. This cannot happen that if I had been born in pre-historic of nature, and he wasn’t dreaming it up. without you. We need your commitment, times, I would have been eaten by a Anarchy — a world without law — is a your contribution, and your sacrifice. saber-toothed tiger long ago. We are terrifying thing. We see glimpses of it in I know you are up to the task. You have all fortunate to be born in an age that every age and in every part of the world, been trained for it, and you are ready. values intellect, and empowers us to including our own. Roving gangs fight Congratulations, Class of 2008. pursue our dreams. each other, and an even worse fate can We are so very proud of you. Enjoy this In this crucial way, your happiness await those on their own. Government momentous day and, as you go out into is tied to the community’s well being. is essential to preserving order. But the the world, please keep us in your hearts. As members of the legal profession, you wrong government — a government You will be in ours.” — more than anyone — are charged with without the rule of law — can be just the solemn responsibility of upholding as bleak. The gangs wear uniforms, but our ideals through law. In becoming a there is no justice, and the strong still member of the bar, you take up one of prey on the weak. humanity’s highest callings: You will The great genius of our system is a support and operate a system of law constrained government, whose officials that harnesses the ambition, creativity, are accountable and whose powers are intelligence, and generosity in human limited. Citizens can concentrate on The full speech may be accessed at http://www.law.columbia.edu/media_inquiries/news_events/2008/Graduation_2008/Dean_Text spring 2008 | 1 4 6 30 The Chief Justice Presiding Columbia Law School @ 150 at issue: Students in the Stone Moot The Law School is celebrating China’s Network Justice Court Competition finals argue 150 years of excellence in Professors Benjamin Liebman before Chief Justice of the legal education with a series and Timothy Wu ask whether United States John G. Roberts, of Sesquicentennial events the Internet is a tool to advance Jr., and three U.S. appeals throughout the world. justice in China or a mecha- court judges. nism of government control. 48 at issue: Charging Ahead Professor Ronald Mann suggests 57 ways America can get out from New publications from under its credit card debt. Columbia Law faculty. 2 | columbia law school magazine FeatureS contents 12 Intellectual Feast By ADAM LIPTAK Leading constitutional law professor Philip Hamburger, lured to New York from Chicago because of its gastronomic delights, finds examining First Amendment rights a feast for the mind. 18 Golden Ticket By SUSANNAH RODGERS DeparTments TODD STITZER ’78 works as chief executive of Cadbury, the world’s second biggest candy company by market share. 4 News & Events 22 Security and Liberty By GREG GORDON 21 Beyond the Classroom: How do we fight terrorism in a globalized world? Three of Columbia’s bibek pandey ’10 newest hires delve daily into achieving a balance between effective 39 Profiles in Scholarship: surveillance and cherished individual rights. nathaniel persily 43 Profiles in Scholarship: 28 Attorney in Charge By DAVID KLEIN ADRIENE HOLDER ’91 is the head of Legal Aid’s Civil Practice Division. robert e. scott 50 Profiles in Scholarship: 32 The Human Rights Institute 10th Anniversary daniel richman HRI’s new co-directors Sarah H. Cleveland and Peter Rosenblum mark this milestone with bold new initiatives, including one examining the 51 Beyond the Classroom: fairness of long-term mining contracts in Africa. barb pitman ’10 56 Profiles in Scholarship: 36 Selling Coffee to a Tea-Drinking Nation By DANIEL WASHBURN christina duffy burnett WANG JINLONG ’88 works as the president of Starbucks in Greater China. 65 Class Notes 44 ‘Goshenized’ By JAMES VESCOVI 76 In Memoriam Business law professor Zohar Goshen brings his successful approach to corporate governance to his new role as chairman of the Israel Security Authority. 80 End Note 46 The Long Wait for Justice By PAUL WACHTER For six years, Jessica Gonzales fought to hold the police of Castle Rock, Colo., responsible for the death of her three daughters. With the help of the Human Rights Clinic, she may find justice in the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. 52 Two Cases, One Issue By THOMAS ADCOCK New Sexuality and Gender Law Clinic obtains asylum for victims in two separate cases. contributing editors printing Opinions expressed in Change of address information miriam Furman maar Printing Service, Inc. Columbia Law School Magazine should be sent to: Paul Wachter do not necessarily reflect the Columbia Law School views of Columbia Law School contributing writers Columbia Law School Magazine 435 West 116 Street, Box A-2 or Columbia University. erin Kelly is published three times New York, NY 10027 James O’Neill dean annually for alumni and This magazine is printed Attn: Office of Alumni David m. Schizer Sonia Von Gutfeld friends of Columbia Law on FSC certified paper. Relations School by the Office of design and art direction Alumni Office associate dean Development and Alumni for development and empire Design Studio 212-854-2680 Relations. Please send your alumni relations photography comments, Letters to the magazine and Public Bruno m. Santonocito Cover photograph: Getty Editor or Class Notes to Affairs Notices Images News /Dave einsel executive director magazine@law.columbia.edu. 212-854-2650 of communications Peter Freed, Alan Orling, Letters to the Editor and magazine@law.columbia.edu and public affairs matthew roberts, Class Notes may be edited publicaffairs@law.columbia.edu elizabeth Schmalz Jon roemer, Lynn Saville, for length and clarity. editorial director Char Smullyan, Chris Copyright 2008, Columbia James Vescovi Taggart, David Wentworth Law School. All rights reserved. spring 2008 | 3 In addition to Roberts, the moot court judging panel included the Hon. Michael W. McConnell, U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit; the Hon. Diana Gribbon Motz, U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit; and the Hon. Diane P. Wood, U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit. The bench questioned the students relentlessly, often interrupting their arguments, giving them only seven or eight seconds to answer one question before they sent the next question zinging forth — just as the justices of the Supreme Court routinely interrupt lawyers who come before them during oral arguments. “I thought it was a great competition and that all four of you did quite well with very difficult material,” said Chief Justice Roberts Roberts, after the students concluded their arguments. Presides and Hogan ’08 Roberts said that as a lawyer, he Wins for Best Oral Advocacy often wondered whether oral arguments really played much of a role in the at Stone Moot Court decision-making process of the Supreme Court. Now, from personal experience, by Todd Stone he knows it matters very much. “When Chief Justice of the United States John Roberts, Jr., presided with three other U.S. we’re in conference, we talk a great deal appeals court judges in a packed Jerome Greene Hall lecture room during the final about the points brought out in the arguments in this year’s Harlan Fiske Stone Moot Court Competition on April 17. argument,” he said. The judges peppered the four student-competitors with questions for an hour The audience of 400 students and and a half, and when the arguments were over, praised them lavishly for holding up faculty remained focused throughout so well under the intense judicial fire. In the end, Christopher M. Hogan ’08 won the hearing, which included not only the Lawrence Greenbaum Prize for Best Oral Advocacy. challenging questions from the judges The students argued Nafziger v. Kaergard, a mock 7th Circuit (Illinois) appellate but also comments from them that court case, written by Allison Wright ’08, which involved three low-income women generated laughter from the crowd.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Faculty Mentoring As a Way to End the Alienation of Women in Legal Academia Heather A
    Boston College Third World Law Journal Volume 18 | Issue 2 Article 6 5-1-1998 Faculty Mentoring as a Way to End the Alienation of Women in Legal Academia Heather A. Carlson Follow this and additional works at: http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/twlj Part of the Legal Education Commons, and the Women Commons Recommended Citation Heather A. Carlson, Faculty Mentoring as a Way to End the Alienation of Women in Legal Academia, 18 B.C. Third World L.J. 317 (1998), http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/twlj/vol18/iss2/6 This Book Review is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Boston College Third World Law Journal by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. For more information, please contact nick.szydlowski@bc.edu. FACULTY MENTORING AS A WAY TO END THE ALIENATION OF WOMEN IN LEGAL ACADEMIA HEATHER A. CARLSON* BECOMING GENTLEMEN: WOMEN, LAw SCHOOL AND INSTITUTIONAL CHANGE. By Lani Guinier, Michelle Fine & Jane Balin. Boston: Beacon Press. 1997. Pp. 169. Lani Guinier's Becoming Gentlemen: Women, Law School, and Insti­ tutional Change exposes the fact that although women and minorities are being admitted to law schools in unprecedented numbers, they are not achieving the same academic success as their white male peers. 1 Guinier's studies reveal that the law school pedagogy itself alienates women, negatively affects their academic success, and thereby repro­ duces and legitimizes existing social stratification.2
    [Show full text]
  • Intelligence Legalism and the National Security Agency's Civil Liberties
    112 Harvard National Security Journal / Vol. 6 ARTICLE Intelligence Legalism and the National Security Agency’s Civil Liberties Gap __________________________ Margo Schlanger* * Henry M. Butzel Professor of Law, University of Michigan. I have greatly benefited from conversations with John DeLong, Mort Halperin, Alex Joel, David Kris, Marty Lederman, Nancy Libin, Rick Perlstein, Becky Richards, and several officials who prefer not to be named, all of whom generously spent time with me, discussing the issues in this article, and many of whom also helped again after reading the piece in draft. I would also like to extend thanks to Sam Bagenstos, Rick Lempert, Daphna Renan, Alex Rossmiller, Adrian Vermeule, Steve Vladeck, Marcy Wheeler, Shirin Sinnar and other participants in the 7th Annual National Security Law Workshop, participants at the University of Iowa law faculty workshop, and my colleagues at the University of Michigan Legal Theory Workshop and governance group lunch, who offered me extremely helpful feedback. Jennifer Gitter and Lauren Dayton provided able research assistance. All errors are, of course, my responsibility. Copyright © 2015 by the Presidents and Fellows of Harvard College and Margo Schlanger. 2015 / Intelligence Legalism and the NSA’s Civil Liberties Gaps 113 Abstract Since June 2013, we have seen unprecedented security breaches and disclosures relating to American electronic surveillance. The nearly daily drip, and occasional gush, of once-secret policy and operational information makes it possible to analyze and understand National Security Agency activities, including the organizations and processes inside and outside the NSA that are supposed to safeguard American’s civil liberties as the agency goes about its intelligence gathering business.
    [Show full text]
  • International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
    United Nations CCPR/SP/89 International Covenant on Distr.: General 7 May 2018 Civil and Political Rights Original: English Meeting of States parties Thirty-sixth meeting New York, 14 June 2018 Item 5 of the provisional agenda Election, in accordance with articles 28–34 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, of nine members of the Human Rights Committee to replace those whose terms are due to expire on 31 December 2018 Election of nine members of the Human Rights Committee to replace those whose terms are due to expire on 31 December 2018 Note by the Secretary-General 1. In conformity with articles 28 to 32 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the thirty-sixth meeting of States parties to the Covenant is to be held at United Nations Headquarters on 14 June 2018 for the purpose of electing nine members of the Human Rights Committee from a list of persons nominated by States parties (sect. II), to replace those whose terms of office will expire on 31 December 2018 (sect. I). I. Members of the Committee whose terms will expire on 31 December 2018 Name of member Country of nationality Mr. Yadh Ben Achour Tunisia Ms. Sarah Cleveland United States of America Mr. Olivier de Frouville France Mr. Yuji Iwasawa Japan Ms. Ivana Jelić Montenegro Mr. Duncan Laki Muhumuza Uganda Ms. Photini Pazartzis Greece Mr. Mauro Politi Italy Ms. Margo Waterval Suriname GE.18-07172 (E) 220518 230518 CCPR/SP/89 II. Persons nominated by States parties 2. In accordance with article 30 (2) of the Covenant, the Secretary-General, in a note verbale dated 15 December 2017, invited the States parties to submit, in conformity with article 29 of the Covenant, their nominations for the election of nine members of the Committee by 9 April 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • SPRING 2020, Vol. 34, Issue 1 SPRING 2020 1
    SPRING 2020, Vol. 34, Issue 1 SPRING 2020 1 MISSION NAWJ’s mission is to promote the judicial role of protecting the rights of individuals under the rule of law through strong, committed, diverse judicial leadership; fairness and equality in the courts; and ON THE COVER 19 Channeling Sugar equal access to justice. Innovative Efforts to Improve Access to Justice through Global Judicial Leadership 21 Learning Lessons from Midyear Meeting in New Orleans addresses Tough Cases BOARD OF DIRECTORS ongoing challenges facing access to justice. Story on page 14 24 Life After the Bench: EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE The Honorable Sharon Mettler PRESIDENT 2 President's Message Hon. Bernadette D'Souza 26 Trial Advocacy Training for Parish of Orleans Civil District Court, Louisiana 2 Interim Executive Director's Women by Women Message PRESIDENT-ELECT 29 District News Hon. Karen Donohue 3 VP of Publications Message King County Superior Court, Seattle, Washington 51 District Directors & Committees 4 Q&A with Judge Ann Breen-Greco VICE PRESIDENT, DISTRICTS Co-Chair Human Trafficking 52 Sponsors Hon. Elizabeth A. White Committee Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County 54 New Members 5 Independent Immigration Courts VICE PRESIDENT, PUBLICATIONS Hon. Heidi Pasichow 7 Resource Board Profile Superior Court of the District of Columbia Cathy Winter-Palmer SECRETARY Hon. Orlinda Naranjo (ret.) 8 Global Judicial Leadership 419th District Court of Texas, Austin Doing the Impossible: NAWJ work with the Pan-American TREASURER Commission of Judges on Social Hon. Elizabeth K. Lee Rights Superior Court of California, San Mateo County IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT 11 Global Judicial Leadership Hon. Tamila E.
    [Show full text]
  • Rice Public Art Announces Four New Works by Women Artists
    RICE PUBLIC ART ANNOUNCES FOUR NEW WORKS BY WOMEN ARTISTS Natasha Bowdoin, Power Flower, 2021 (HOUSTON, TX – January 26, 2021) In support of Rice University’s commitment to expand and diversify its public art collection, four original works by leading women artists will be added to the campus collection this spring. The featured artists are Natasha Bowdoin (b. 1981, West Kennebunk, ME), Shirazeh Houshiary (b. 1955, Shiraz, Iran), Beverly Pepper (b. 1922 New York, NY, d. 2020 Todi, Italy), and Pae White (b. 1963, Pasadena, CA). Three of the works are site-specific commissions. The Beverly Pepper sculpture is an acquisition of one of the last works by the artist, who died in 2020. Alison Weaver, the Suzanne Deal Booth Executive Director of the Moody Center for the Arts, said, “We are honored to add these extraordinary works to the Rice public art collection and are proud to highlight innovative women artists. We look forward to the ways these unique installations will engage students, faculty, staff, alumni and visitors in the spaces where they study, learn, live, work, and spend time.” Natasha Bowdoin’s site-specific installation will fill the central hallway of the renovated M.D. Anderson Biology Building, Shirazeh Houshiary’s glass sculpture will grace the lawn of the new Sid Richardson College, Beverly Pepper’s steel monolith will be placed adjacent to the recently completed Brockman Hall for Opera, and Pae White’s hanging sculpture will fill the rotunda of McNair Hall, home to the Jones Graduate School of Business. The four works will be installed in the first four months of the year and be on permanent view beginning May 1, 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • Toward a Global Critical Feminist Vision: Domestic Work and the Nanny Tax Debate
    University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law DigitalCommons@UM Carey Law Faculty Scholarship Francis King Carey School of Law Faculty 1999 Toward a Global Critical Feminist Vision: Domestic Work and the Nanny Tax Debate Taunya Lovell Banks University of Maryland School of Law, tbanks@law.umaryland.edu Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/fac_pubs Part of the Labor and Employment Law Commons, Law and Gender Commons, and the Law and Race Commons Digital Commons Citation Banks, Taunya Lovell, "Toward a Global Critical Feminist Vision: Domestic Work and the Nanny Tax Debate" (1999). Faculty Scholarship. 220. https://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/fac_pubs/220 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Francis King Carey School of Law Faculty at DigitalCommons@UM Carey Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UM Carey Law. For more information, please contact smccarty@law.umaryland.edu. Toward a Global Critical Feminist Vision: Domestic Work and the Nanny Tax Debate Taunya Lovell Banks* I. INTRODUCTION ll. THE UNDER REGULATION OF DOMESTIC LABOR A. Domestic Work Is Not Real Work B. Domestic Work Is a Private Matter C. Domestic Work as Women's Work ill. LEGISLATIVE NARRATIVE: FRAMING THE PUBLIC POLICY DEBATE A. The Legislative Debates About Employees B. The Legislative Debates About Employers C. Public Debates: What's in a Name-Racial Markers IV. COMPETINGGENDEREDNARRATIVESABOUTDOMESTICWORK:AFFLUENT WORKING WOMEN AND BLACK FEMINISTS A. Affluent Women: Zoe Baird, Not One of Us? B. Black Feminists: Zoe Baird, Not One of Us-Black Women as Domestic Workers, Myth or Reality C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Inauguration of David W. Leebron
    ^ The Inauguration of David W. Leebron The Inauguration of David W. Leebron The Beginning ofHis Presidency ofRice University Copyright © 2006 by Rice University Houston, Texas Photography by Tommy LaVergne and Jeff Fitlow, Rice University Design and Production by Web and Print Communications, Rice University Printed by Charles P. Young, Houston, Texas 2006 Table of Contents Foreword 7 Part I: The Inauguration 9 David W. Leebron: A Biographical Sketch 11 The Official Summons 14 The Inaugural Proceedings 15 The Investiture 18 Community Celebration 32 Delegates of Institutions of Higher Learning 39 Delegates of Learned and Professional Societies 44 Letters and Certificates of Congratulations 45 Inaugural Committee and University Marshals 48 Part II: Historical Background 49 A Brief History of Rice University 51 The Presidents of Rice University 52 Rice University Board of Trustees 54 The Presidential Search Process 55 The Presidential Search Committee 56 The "White Paper": The Context of Rice University 57 Part III: Transition—Looking to the Future 67 A Process for Change 69 The Call to Conversation 70 A Vision for Rice University's Second Century 81 Endorsement by the Board of Trustees 84 Photographs follow page 38. Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2010 with funding from Lyrasis members and Sloan Foundation funding http://www.archive.org/details/inaugurationofdaOOrice Foreword The inauguration of a new president is a signal event in the Hfe of any university, for such occasions allow an opportunity not only to celebrate past accomplishments but also to suggest new goals and fresh agendas for the future. Inaugurations at Rice University have always been especially memorable events because the entire history of the institution represents the living out, the gradual fulfillment, of a remarkable vision of the university's purpose articulated by its first president, Edgar Odell Lovett, at its formal opening in 1912.
    [Show full text]
  • Domestic Violence As a Human Rights Violation Caroline Bettinger-López University of Miami School of Law, Clopez@Law.Miami.Edu
    University of Miami Law School University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository Articles Faculty and Deans 2008 Human Rights at Home: Domestic Violence as a Human Rights Violation Caroline Bettinger-López University of Miami School of Law, clopez@law.miami.edu Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/fac_articles Part of the Family Law Commons, and the Human Rights Law Commons Recommended Citation Caroline Bettinger-López, Human Rights at Home: Domestic Violence as a Human Rights Violation, 42 Colum. Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 581 (2008). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty and Deans at University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. For more information, please contact library@law.miami.edu. HUMAN RIGHTS AT HOME: DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AS A HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATION Caroline Bettinger-L6pez* On March 2, 2007, Jessica Lenahan (formerly Gonzales)1 spoke at the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights in Washington, D.C. about why she thought the United States was responsible for human rights violations against her and her deceased children. Before four commissioners, a U.S. State Department delegation, and members of the general public, she testified about how local police in Colorado refused to enforce a domestic violence restraining order against her estranged husband in 1999, and how her three daughters were tragically killed as a result. She discussed how her federal lawsuit against the police wound its way to the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Virtues and Vices of Advocacy Strategies in the War on Terror
    Roger Williams University DOCS@RWU Law Faculty Scholarship Law Faculty Scholarship 4-2009 The etD ainees' Dilemma: The irV tues and Vices of Advocacy Strategies in the War on Terror Peter Margulies Roger Williams University School of Law Follow this and additional works at: http://docs.rwu.edu/law_fac_fs Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Human Rights Law Commons, International Law Commons, Law and Politics Commons, and the Legal Profession Commons Recommended Citation Peter Margulies, The eD tainees' Dilemma: The irV tues and Vices of Advocacy Strategies in the War on Terror, 57 Buff. L. Rev. 347, 432 (2009) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Faculty Scholarship at DOCS@RWU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Law Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of DOCS@RWU. For more information, please contact mwu@rwu.edu. +(,121/,1( Citation: 57 Buff. L. Rev. 347 2009 Provided by: Roger Williams University School of Law Library Content downloaded/printed from HeinOnline Thu Nov 17 10:09:44 2016 -- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance of HeinOnline's Terms and Conditions of the license agreement available at http://heinonline.org/HOL/License -- The search text of this PDF is generated from uncorrected OCR text. -- To obtain permission to use this article beyond the scope of your HeinOnline license, please use: Copyright Information BUFFALO LAW REVIEW VOLUME 57 APRIL 2009 NUMBER 2 The Detainees' Dilemma: The Virtues and Vices of Advocacy Strategies in the War on Terror PETER MARGULIESt INTRODUCTION For detainees in the war on terror, advocacy outside of court is often the main event.' Analysis of advocacy through the prism of Supreme Court decisions 2 resembles surveying t Professor of Law, Roger Williams University School of Law; e-mail: pmargulies@rwu.edu.
    [Show full text]
  • Production Biographies
    PRODUCTION BIOGRAPHIES MIKE O’MALLEY (Executive Producer & Showrunner, Writer- 201, 207, 210) Truly a multi-hyphenate, Mike O’Malley got his start in front of the camera hosting Nickelodeon’s “Get the Picture” and the iconic game show “Guts”. His success continued in television with standout roles in “Yes Dear”, “My Name Is Earl”, “My Own Worst Enemy”, “Justified”, and his Emmy®-nominated, groundbreaking performance as ‘Burt Hummel’ on the hit show “Glee”. Mike’s feature work includes roles in Eat Pray Love, Cedar Rapids, Leatherheads, Meet Dave, 28 Days, and the upcoming Untitled Concussion Project starring Will Smith which will be released Christmas 2015. Also an accomplished writer, Mike wrote and produced the independent feature Certainty which he adapted from his own play. In television, Mike has served as a Consulting Producer on “Shameless” and is in his second season as creator and Executive Producer of “Survivor’s Remorse” for Starz. LEBRON JAMES (Executive Producer) LeBron James is widely considered one of the greatest athletes of his generation. James’ extraordinary basketball skills and dedication to the game have won him the admiration of fans across the globe, and have made him an international icon. Prior to the 2014-2015 season, James returned to his hometown in Ohio and rejoined the Cleveland Cavaliers in their mission to bring a championship to the community he grew up in. James had previously spent seven seasons in Cleveland after being drafted out of high school by his hometown team with the first overall pick in the 2003 NBA Draft. James led the Cavaliers to five straight NBA playoff appearances and earned six All-Star selections during his first stint in Cleveland.
    [Show full text]
  • Losing Talent 2020
    #WelcomeToSucceed LOSING TALENT 2020 An Economic and Foreign Policy Risk America Can’t Ignore MARCH 2020 “ Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world.” nelson mandela #WelcomeToSucceed EXECUTIVE SUMMARY International students create jobs, drive research, enrich our classrooms, strengthen national security, and become America’s greatest foreign policy assets. Yet new international student enrollment is down dramatically across the United States. International students contributed nearly $41 billion to our economy last year. During the 2018 – 2019 academic year, international students created or supported more than 458,000 jobs. That’s three jobs created for every seven international students who chose to study here. International education is the fifth-largest U.S. service sector export. Part of the American strength has been to be a global recruiter The most recent U.S. Department of State Open Doors® report, of talent … There are people like published by the Institute of International Education, this all over the world whose views reported a 0.9% decline in new international student enrollments; have been shaped very positively this is the third consecutive year of decline in new international student enrollment at U.S. colleges and universities. by their experience here … That just seems like the strongest form of soft Data show that international students and scholars feel less safe and power we’ve seen and we simply less welcome in the United States than the previous year surveyed. ought to not be giving that up. University and industry leaders acknowledge that anti-immigrant rhetoric and policies contribute to a chilling effect on international Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Indirect Constraints on the Office of Legal Counsel: Examining a Role for the Senate Judiciary Committee
    Stanford Law Review Volume 73 June 2021 NOTE Indirect Constraints on the Office of Legal Counsel: Examining a Role for the Senate Judiciary Committee William S. Janover* Abstract. As arbiter of the constitutionality of executive actions, the Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) possesses vast authority over the operation of the federal government and is one of the primary vessels for the articulation of executive power. It therefore is not surprising that the OLC has found itself at the center of controversy across Democratic and Republican administrations. OLC opinions have justified the obstruction of valid congressional investigations, the targeted killing of an American citizen overseas, repeated military incursions without congressional approval, and, most infamously, torture. These episodes have generated a significant body of proposals to reform, constrain, or altogether eliminate the OLC. All of these proposals can be categorized as either direct or indirect constraints on how the OLC operates. Direct constraints target how the OLC actually creates its legal work product. Indirect constraints instead focus on the OLC’s personnel or the public scrutiny the Office’s opinions will face. This Note expands on this existing body of research, focusing on how one institution unstudied in this context, the United States Senate Judiciary Committee, can operationalize meaningful indirect constraints on the OLC. Unlike the other actors that scholars have examined, the Committee’s position outside the executive branch allows it to sidestep the President’s ever-expanding reach within the federal bureaucracy. At the same time, the Committee’s oversight powers and its central role in the nomination of both the OLC’s leader and Article III judges give it important constitutional and statutory authority to constrain the Office.
    [Show full text]