DOCSLIB.ORG

Synthesis of Science in South-Eastern Georgian Bay And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Synthesis of Science in South‐Eastern Georgian Bay and the Nottawasaga Valley Watershed Conducted Under the Lake Simcoe South‐Eastern Georgian Bay Clean Up Fund 2012‐2017 A report prepared by Zoey Duggan and Patricia Chambers for Environment and Climate Change Canada 2017 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................. 3 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 7 2.0 BACKGROUND ...................................................................................................................................... 10 3.0 NUTRIENT DYNAMICS AND ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONS FOR SOUTHERN GEORGIAN BAY (NOTTAWASAGA BAY) ................................................................................................................................ 16 3.1 NUTRIENT DELIVERY FROM THE NOTTAWASAGA RIVER WATERSHED ........................................... 16 3.2 NUTRIENT DELIVERY FROM THE BEACHES ALONG NOTTAWASAGA BAY ........................................ 20 3.3 MODELING AND FORECASTING THE FATE OF PHOSPHORUS .......................................................... 22 3.4 PHYTOPLANKTON AND HARMFUL ALGAL BLOOMS ........................................................................ 23 3.5 SCIENCE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................................................. 23 4.0 NUTRIENT DYNAMICS AND ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONS FOR EASTERN GEORGIAN BAY EMBAYMENTS 26 4.1 HYPOXIA AND ITS CAUSES ................................................................................................................ 27 4.2 PHOSPHORUS DYNAMICS ................................................................................................................. 28 4.3 PHYTOPLANKTON AND HARMFUL ALGAL BLOOMS ......................................................................... 32 4.4 MODEL BUILDING AND FORECASTING ............................................................................................. 35 4.5 SCIENCE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................................................. 37 5.0 FLUCTUATING WATER LEVELS, WETLANDS HEALTH AND FISH POPULATIONS ................................... 40 6.0 ADVANCEMENT OF BASELINE DATA COLLECTION AND MONITORING ............................................... 44 6.1 IMPROVEMENTS TO WATER QUALITY MONITORING ...................................................................... 44 6.2 IMPROVEMENTS TO BASELINE DATA AND MAPPING ...................................................................... 49 7.0 RECOMMENDATIONS AND SCIENCE GAPS .......................................................................................... 53 7.1 MANANGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS .......................................................................................... 53 7.2 SCIENCE GAPS .................................................................................................................................. 54 7.3 SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................................ 54 8.0 REFERENCES ......................................................................................................................................... 56 9.0 APPENDIX ONE: RESEARCH AND MONITORING PROJECT SUMMARIES ............................................... 60 1 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Geographic scope of Lake Simcoe Georgian Bay Clean Up Fund.. ................................................. 8 Figure 2. Total phosphorus concentration for sampled locations from the Georgian Bay Water Quality Study (2003‐2005) by the MOE ................................................................................................................... 11 Figure 3. Scope of research projects undertaken in the Nottawasaga watershed and southern Georgian Bay ............................................................................................................................................................... 16 Figure 4. (a) Soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP) concentrations observed along Wasaga Beach (2013) (b) SRP concentrations in the groundwater. ............................................................................................... 21 Figure 5. Dispersal of the Nottawasaga River plume: (a) modeled using ELCOM, and (b) photographed from a drone. .............................................................................................................................................. 23 Figure 6. Scope of research projects undertaken in embayments along southeastern Georgian Bay. ..... 26 Figure 7. (a) Volume‐weighted oxygen concentrations in the hypolimnia of Basins, (b) inset map shows locations of basins. ...................................................................................................................................... 27 Figure 8. The ratio of hypolimnetic volume to surface area of the sediment‐water interface (VH:ASWI) , a good predictor of the mean dissolved oxygen consumption rate. ........................................................... 28 Figure 9. Nitrogen (N) and carbon (C) compositional analysis of sediments from (a) North Bay and (b) Tadenac Bay ........................................................................................................................................... 33 Figure 10. Distribution of phytoplankton with depth in South Bay in July 2014 ........................................ 35 Figure 11. Predicted and observed total phosphorus concentrations at stations In Honey Harbour, North Bay, South Bay from June 2014 – November 2015 .................................................................................... 36 Figure 12. Monthly and yearly mean water levels 1918‐2016 for Lake Huron‐Michigan .......................... 40 Figure 13. A screenshot of the Georgian Bay Biosphere Reserve, State of the Bay nutrient water monitoring website ..................................................................................................................................... 45 Figure 14. (a) Flight line indicating shoreline coverage of oblique imagery; (b) orthogonal image, and (c) the same location show as an oblique image ............................................................................................. 50 Figure 15. Bathymetry and sub‐bottom profiling, Sturgeon Bay ................................................................ 51 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Annual total phosphorus loads (kg/year) for select tributaries to the Nottawasaga River. ......... 19 Table 2. Comparison of phosphorus loads entering Nottawasaga Bay from the Nottawasaga River. ....... 22 Table 3. Estimated annual loads of total phosphorus from major sources discharging to the North‐South embayment system ..................................................................................................................................... 31 Table 4. Summary of monitoring, and monitoring component of research projects in Georgian Bay and surrounding watersheds conducted under the LSGBCUF........................................................................... 47 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY To address public concerns about impaired water quality (particularly the presence of algal blooms) and meet commitments to protect ecosystem health under the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement, Environment and Climate Change Canada initiated the Lake Simcoe South‐Eastern Georgian Bay Cleanup Fund (LSGBCUF) in 2012. The goals of the LSGBCUF were to improve monitoring and research of phosphorus sources, fate and impacts and promote ecosystem restoration and remediation in the watersheds of Lake Simcoe and the Nottawasaga Valley as well as the geographic area encompassing the shores of south‐eastern Georgian Bay (i.e., from the French River in the north, highway 400/69 to the east and south to Port Severn, including the Severn River and Lake Couchiching). Over the program’s five year span (2012‐2017), the LSGBCUF supported 106 projects led by provincial and federal governments, First Nations, universities, conservation authorities and citizen science groups at a total expenditure of $24 million. The objective of this report was to synthesize the science outcomes of the 35 research and monitoring projects funded under the 2012‐2017 LSBGCUF and conducted within the geographic boundary of south‐eastern Georgian Bay. The aim of these projects was to improve understanding of nutrient dynamics (especially phosphorus dynamics) and associated ecosystem functions of Georgian Bay waters, with a particular focus on the Nottawasaga River watershed and its receiving water, Nottawasaga Bay, and the embayments on eastern Georgian Bay. New science findings are summarized and information that can inform decision and policy making is identified, with projects grouped thematically, and in some cases, regionally (Nottawasaga Bay and coastal embayments). The goal of research projects undertaken in the Nottawasaga River watershed and the nearshore area of southern Georgian Bay was to identify potential sources and transport pathways of phosphorus to Nottawasaga Bay, and evaluate the fate of phosphorus once delivered to the Bay. Studies on the Nottawasaga River watershed showed that water quality is generally considered impaired along the entire length of the river. While the percentage of pasture land in the
Recommended publications
  • Rail Safety Program Presentation for 67Th Legislative Assembly

    Rail Safety Program Presentation for 67Th Legislative Assembly

    Division of Railroad Safety NDPSC Rail Safety Program 67th Legislative Assembly North Dakota Public Service Commission ● State Capitol – 12th Floor ● 600 E. Boulevard Ave. Bismarck, ND 58505-0480 ● www.psc.nd.gov 1 North Dakota Rail System 3,532 Miles of Main Line Track Information is current as of September 30, 2020 North Dakota Public Service Commission ● State Capitol – 12th Floor ● 600 E. Boulevard Ave. Bismarck, ND 58505-0480 ● www.psc.nd.gov 2 2 1 Communities Impacted by Railroads • 290 communities intersect or are in close proximity to the railroad, many of which the Commission has inspected at: Absaraka, Adams, Alsen, Amenia, Ambrose, Aneta, Anamoose, Ardoch, Argusville, Arvilla, Ayr, Balfour, Baldwin, Barney, Barton, Beach, Belfield, Benedict, Bergen, Berlin, Berthold, Beulah, Bisbee, Bismarck, Blaisdell, Bordulac, Bottineau, Bowbells, Bowman, Braddock, Bremen, Buchanan, Bucyrus, Buffalo, Burlington, Butte, Buxton, Calvin, Cando, Canton City, Carpio, Carrington, Casselton, Cathay, Cavalier, Cayuga, Chaffee, Churchs Ferry, Cleveland, Clifford, Cogswell, Coleharbor, Colfax, Conway, Coulee, Courtenay, Crary, Crosby, Crystal, Cuba, Cummings, Dahlen, Davenport, Dawson, Des Lacs, Devils Lake, Dickinson, Donnybrook, Douglas, Drake, Drayton, Driscoll, Dwight, Doyon, Eckelson, Edgeley, Edinburg, Egeland, Eldridge, Elliot, Emerado, Emrick, Enderlin, Englevale, Epping, Erie, Fairdale, Fairmount, East Fairview, Fargo, Fessenden, Fingal, Finley, Flaxton, Fordville, Forest River, Forman, Fortuna, Foxholm, Fredonia, Fryburg, Fullerton, Galesburg,
  • The Majestic “Notty” Moonlight Bay Cottages – North Bay 1958 Glengarry Cottages 1966

    The Majestic “Notty” Moonlight Bay Cottages – North Bay 1958 Glengarry Cottages 1966

    The Majestic “Notty” Moonlight Bay Cottages – North Bay 1958 Glengarry Cottages 1966 Topics for Today •The Notty •The Nottawasaga Steelheaders • Great Fishery, Concerns and Issues •What can we do The Notty ... Majestic Lady Survival of a Great Watershed • Gary Christie • B. Sc. Biology (York) • Training (Sales- Medical & Life Sciences Research Clinical, DNA) • President (Since 2001) Nottawasaga Steelheaders • Passions – Fishing, Wine & Good Friends and…putting a little back with some volunteer work Gary at Wasaga Beach 1957 Nottawasaga The name is derived from Huron First Nation words referring to the “outlet of the river” where Iroquois would attack the Hurons. 1600 km 3500 sq km MW The Notty…did you know? • Notty Basin - 3500 sq km • 3 counties and 18 municipalities • main branch is over 120 km in length • 11 major tributaries >>McIntyre Creek, Little Marl Creek, Marl Creek, Willow Creek, Mad River, Bear Creek, Pine River, Boyne River, Innisfil Creek, Sheldon Creek and the Upper Nottawasaga reaching as far as Orangeville. • many species of fish, including pike, bass, walleye, sturgeon, brown trout, brook trout, rainbow trout, crappie, salmon – 75 Species of Fish • Home of Int’l recognized (RAMSAR) Minesing Wetland • Wasaga Beach historically important –War of 1812. HMS Nancy sunk defending great lakes • Notty was key lumber river in 1800’s and proposed rail line to Toronto from Wasaga Beach • Notty basin formed by Pleistocene era glaciers 20, 000 years ago • 3 Geological Features - Niagara Escarpment - Rolling Moraines - Broad Simcoe
  • GOVERNMENT 623 19.4 Electoral Districts, Votes Polled and Names

    GOVERNMENT 623 19.4 Electoral Districts, Votes Polled and Names

    GOVERNMENT 623 19.4 Electoral districts, votes polled and names of members of the House of Commons as elected at the thirty-second general election, Feb. 18, 1980 (continued) Province and Popu­ Total Votes Name of member Party electoral district lation, votes polled affili- Census polled by 1976 (incl. member rejec­ tions) ONTARIO (concluded) Ottawa - Carleton 119,748 65,562 34,960 J.-L. Pepin Lib. Ottawa Centre 83,371 47,417 21,659 J. Evans Lib. Ottawa - Vanier 84,309 41,684 27,564 J.-R. Gauthier Lib. Ottawa West 95,479 50,985 22,460 L. Francis Lib. Oxford 85,337 42,378 19,382 B. Halliday PC Parry Sound - Muskoka 69,668 34,170 14,333 S. Darling PC Perth 66,279 32,026 15,172 W. Jarvis PC Peterborough 91,656 48,359 19,417 W. Domm PC Prince Edward - Hastings 75,447 36,991 16,893 J. EUis PC Renfrew - Nipissing - Pembroke 82,755 39,813 20,529 L. Hopkins Lib. St. Catharines 102,420 49,386 18,622 J. Reid PC Sarnia 81,342 40,291 16,275 J. Bud Cullen Lib. Sault Ste Marie 63,615 32,332 15,449 R. Irwin Lib. Simcoe North 80,718 40,932 14,874 D. Lewis PC Simcoe South 92,549 45,540 19,768 R.A. Stewart PC Stormont - Dundas 85,366 42,140 22,251 E. Lumley Lib. Sudbury 86,950 39,582 21,954 D. Frith Lib. Thunder Bay - Atikokan 68,571 33,840 13,234 P. McRae Lib. Thunder Bay - Nipigon 68,660 35,727 16,592 J.
  • The Canadian Handbook and Tourist's Guide

    The Canadian Handbook and Tourist's Guide

    3 LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAICN IN MEMORY OF STEWART S. HOWE JOURNALISM CLASS OF 1928 STEWART S. HOWE FOUNDATION 917.1 Smlc 1867 cop. H. T.H>ii Old Trapper, v. Photo, : THE CANADIAN HANDBOOK AND Tourists Guide GIVING A DESCRIPTION OF CANADIAN LAKE AND RIVER SCENERY AND PLACES OF HISTORICAL INTEREST WITH THE BEST SPOTS FOR Fishing and Shooting. MONTREAL Published by M. Longmoore & Co., Printing House, 6y Great St. James Street, - 1867. Entered according to the Act of the Provincial Parliament, in the year one thousand eight hundred and sixty-six, by John Taylor, in the Office of the Kegistrar of the Province of Canada. 1 /?./ • . / % . THE CANADIAN HANDBOOK AND TOURIST'S GUIDE. INTRODUCTION. The Nooks and Corners of Canada, and. more especially of the Lower Province, in addition to the interest they awaken as important sources of Commercial and Agricultural wealth, are invested with no ordinary attraction for the Naturalist, the Antiquary, the Historian, and the Tourist in quest of pleasure or of health. We have often wondered why more of the venturesome spirits amongst our transatlantic friends do not tear themselves away, even for a few months, from London fogs, to visit our distant but more favoured clime. How is it that so few, comparatively speaking, come to enjoy the bracing air and bright summer skies of Canada ? With what zest could the enterprising or eccentric among them undertake a ramble, with rod and gun in hand, from Niagara to Labrador, over the Laurentian Chain of Moun- tains, choosing as rallying points, whereat to compare notes, the summit of Cape Eternity in the Saguenay district, and 6 Introduction.
  • Vanguards of Canada

    Vanguards of Canada

    CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY WiLLARD FiSKE Endowment """"""" '""'"'^ E 78.C2M162" Vanguards of Canada 3 1924 028 638 488 A Cornell University S Library The original of tliis book is in tine Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924028638488 VANGUARDS OF CANADA BOOKS The Rev. John Maclean, M.A., Ph.D., B.D. Vanguards of Canada By JOHN MACLEAN, M.A., Ph.D.. D.D. Member of the British Association, The American Society for the Advance- ment of Science, The American Folk-Lore Society, Correspondent of The Bureau of Ethnology, Washington; Chief Archivist of the Methodist Church, Canada. B 13 G TORONTO The Missionary Society of the Methodist Church The Young People's Forward Movement Department F. C. STEPHENSON, Secretary 15. OOPTRIGHT, OanADA, 1918, BT Frboeriok Clareb Stbfhekgon TOROHTO The Missionary Society of the Methodist Church The Young People's Forward Movement F. 0. Stephenson , Secretary. PREFACE In this admirable book the Rev. Dr. Maclean has done a piece of work of far-reaching significance. The Doctor is well fitted by training, experience, knowledge and sym- pathy to do this work and has done it in a manner which fully vindicates his claim to all these qualifications. Our beloved Canada is just emerging into a vigorous consciousness of nationhood and is showing herself worthy of the best ideals in her conception of what the hig'hest nationality really involves. It is therefore of the utmost importance that the young of this young nation thrilled with a new sense of power, and conscious of a new place in the activities of the world, should understand thoroughly those factors and forces which have so strikingly combined to give us our present place of prominence.
  • The Horan Family Diaspora Since Leaving Ireland 191 Years Ago

    The Horan Family Diaspora Since Leaving Ireland 191 Years Ago

    A Genealogical Report on the Descendants of Michael Horan and Mary Minnock by A.L. McDevitt Introduction The purpose of this report is to identify the descendants of Michael Horan and Mary Minnock While few Horans live in the original settlement locations, there are still many people from the surrounding areas of Caledon, and Simcoe County, Ontario who have Horan blood. Though heavily weigh toward information on the Albion Township Horans, (the descendants of William Horan and Honorah Shore), I'm including more on the other branches as information comes in. That is the descendants of the Horans that moved to Grey County, Ontario and from there to Michigan and Wisconsin and Montana. I also have some information on the Horans that moved to Western Canada. This report was done using Family Tree Maker 2012. The Genealogical sites I used the most were Ancestry.ca, Family Search.com and Automatic Genealogy. While gathering information for this report I became aware of the importance of getting this family's story written down while there were still people around who had a connection with the past. In the course of researching, I became aware of some differences in the original settlement stories. I am including these alternate versions of events in this report, though I may be personally skeptical of the validity of some of the facts presented. All families have myths. I feel the dates presented in the Land Petitions of Mary Minnock and the baptisms in the County Offaly, Ireland, Rahan Parish registers speak for themselves. Though not a professional Genealogist, I have the obligation to not mislead other researchers.
  • The State of Lake Huron in 2010 Special Publication 13-01

    The State of Lake Huron in 2010 Special Publication 13-01

    THE STATE OF LAKE HURON IN 2010 SPECIAL PUBLICATION 13-01 The Great Lakes Fishery Commission was established by the Convention on Great Lakes Fisheries between Canada and the United States, which was ratified on October 11, 1955. It was organized in April 1956 and assumed its duties as set forth in the Convention on July 1, 1956. The Commission has two major responsibilities: first, develop coordinated programs of research in the Great Lakes, and, on the basis of the findings, recommend measures which will permit the maximum sustained productivity of stocks of fish of common concern; second, formulate and implement a program to eradicate or minimize sea lamprey populations in the Great Lakes. The Commission is also required to publish or authorize the publication of scientific or other information obtained in the performance of its duties. In fulfillment of this requirement the Commission publishes the Technical Report Series, intended for peer-reviewed scientific literature; Special Publications, designed primarily for dissemination of reports produced by working committees of the Commission; and other (non-serial) publications. Technical Reports are most suitable for either interdisciplinary review and synthesis papers of general interest to Great Lakes fisheries researchers, managers, and administrators, or more narrowly focused material with special relevance to a single but important aspect of the Commission's program. Special Publications, being working documents, may evolve with the findings of and charges to a particular committee. Both publications follow the style of the Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. Sponsorship of Technical Reports or Special Publications does not necessarily imply that the findings or conclusions contained therein are endorsed by the Commission.
  • The Canadian Parliamentary Guide

    The Canadian Parliamentary Guide

    NUNC COGNOSCO EX PARTE THOMAS J. BATA LI BRARY TRENT UNIVERSITY us*<•-« m*.•• ■Jt ,.v<4■■ L V ?' V t - ji: '^gj r ", •W* ~ %- A V- v v; _ •S I- - j*. v \jrfK'V' V ■' * ' ’ ' • ’ ,;i- % »v • > ». --■ : * *S~ ' iJM ' ' ~ : .*H V V* ,-l *» %■? BE ! Ji®». ' »- ■ •:?■, M •* ^ a* r • * «'•# ^ fc -: fs , I v ., V', ■ s> f ** - l' %% .- . **» f-•" . ^ t « , -v ' *$W ...*>v■; « '.3* , c - ■ : \, , ?>?>*)■#! ^ - ••• . ". y(.J, ■- : V.r 4i .» ^ -A*.5- m “ * a vv> w* W,3^. | -**■ , • * * v v'*- ■ ■ !\ . •* 4fr > ,S<P As 5 - _A 4M ,' € - ! „■:' V, ' ' ?**■- i.." ft 1 • X- \ A M .-V O' A ■v ; ■ P \k trf* > i iwr ^.. i - "M - . v •?*»-• -£-. , v 4’ >j- . *•. , V j,r i 'V - • v *? ■ •.,, ;<0 / ^ . ■'■ ■ ,;• v ,< */ ■" /1 ■* * *-+ ijf . ^--v- % 'v-a <&, A * , % -*£, - ^-S*.' J >* •> *' m' . -S' ?v * ... ‘ *•*. * V .■1 *-.«,»'• ■ 1**4. * r- * r J-' ; • * “ »- *' ;> • * arr ■ v * v- > A '* f ' & w, HSi.-V‘ - .'">4-., '4 -' */ ' -',4 - %;. '* JS- •-*. - -4, r ; •'ii - ■.> ¥?<* K V' V ;' v ••: # * r * \'. V-*, >. • s s •*•’ . “ i"*■% * % «. V-- v '*7. : '""•' V v *rs -*• * * 3«f ' <1k% ’fc. s' ^ * ' .W? ,>• ■ V- £ •- .' . $r. « • ,/ ••<*' . ; > -., r;- •■ •',S B. ' F *. ^ , »» v> ' ' •' ' a *' >, f'- \ r ■* * is #* ■ .. n 'K ^ XV 3TVX’ ■■i ■% t'' ■ T-. / .a- ■ '£■ a« .v * tB• f ; a' a :-w;' 1 M! : J • V ^ ’ •' ■ S ii 4 » 4^4•M v vnU :^3£'" ^ v .’'A It/-''-- V. - ;ii. : . - 4 '. ■ ti *%?'% fc ' i * ■ , fc ' THE CANADIAN PARLIAMENTARY GUIDE AND WORK OF GENERAL REFERENCE I9OI FOR CANADA, THE PROVINCES, AND NORTHWEST TERRITORIES (Published with the Patronage of The Parliament of Canada) Containing Election Returns, Eists and Sketches of Members, Cabinets of the U.K., U.S., and Canada, Governments and Eegisla- TURES OF ALL THE PROVINCES, Census Returns, Etc.
  • SLSN Greenbelt Submission May 28 2015

    SLSN Greenbelt Submission May 28 2015

    SOUTH LAKE SIMCOE NATURALISTS SLSN is an incorporated not-for-profit Member of Ontario Nature. Post Office Box 1044 Sutton West, Ontario, L0E 1R0 Telephone 905-722-8021 (www.slsnc.ca) Research Partner with The Zephyr Society of Lake Simcoe (www.zephyrsociety.ca) Member: Rescue Lake Simcoe Coalition Member: Greenbelt Alliance South Lake Simcoe Naturalists (Ontario Nature Member Organization) RE: 2015 Co-ordinated Review Policy Submission Date: 2015-05-28 Land Use Planning Review Ontario Growth Secretariat Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing 777 Bay Street, suite 425 Toronto, Ontario M5G 2E5 Strengthening the Greenbelt Plan, Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan, Niagara Escarpment Plan and Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe The South Lake Simcoe Naturalists (SLSN) are a fully federated organization of Ontario Nature and an original community group which was involved previously to 2005 advocating and commenting Ontario’s innovative Greenbelt, Growth Plan, and later the Lake Simcoe Protection Plan. Our group brings together many naturalists, environmentalists and local community representatives in the entire South Lake Simcoe Area to ensure the continued protection and expansion of the Greenbelt, and its relation to the Oak Ridges Moraine in our area. The quality of our forests, grassland meadows, natural core and corridor areas determine water quality, nature and human health, and our economy. The Greenbelt Plan is a legacy that we must strengthen and grow if we want to have a healthy environment, a robust rural economy and vibrant natural areas that connect and support Ontario’s rich biodiversity in perpetuity. 1 The common attributes of these three conservation plans are critical for protecting the many natural and cultural values of South Lake Simcoe.
  • Targeted Residential Fire Risk Reduction a Summary of At-Risk Aboriginal Areas in Canada

    Targeted Residential Fire Risk Reduction a Summary of At-Risk Aboriginal Areas in Canada

    Targeted Residential Fire Risk Reduction A Summary of At-Risk Aboriginal Areas in Canada Len Garis, Sarah Hughan, Paul Maxim, and Alex Tyakoff October 2016 Executive Summary Despite the steady reduction in rates of fire that have been witnessed in Canada in recent years, ongoing research has demonstrated that there continue to be striking inequalities in the way in which fire risk is distributed through society. It is well-established that residential dwelling fires are not distributed evenly through society, but that certain sectors in Canada experience disproportionate numbers of incidents. Oftentimes, it is the most vulnerable segments of society who face the greatest risk of fire and can least afford the personal and property damage it incurs. Fire risks are accentuated when property owners or occupiers fail to install and maintain fire and life safety devices such smoke alarms and carbon monoxide detectors in their homes. These life saving devices are proven to be highly effective, inexpensive to obtain and, in most cases, Canadian fire services will install them for free. A key component of driving down residential fire rates in Canadian cities, towns, hamlets and villages is the identification of communities where fire risk is greatest. Using the internationally recognized Home Safe methodology described in this study, the following Aboriginal and Non- Aboriginal communities in provinces and territories across Canada are determined to be at heightened risk of residential fire. These communities would benefit from a targeted smoke alarm give-away program and public education campaign to reduce the risk of residential fires and ensure the safety and well-being of all Canadian citizens.
  • 21 Lake Huron LAMP 2017-2021 1-55

    21 Lake Huron LAMP 2017-2021 1-55

    LAKE HURON LAKEWIDE ACTION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN 2017-2021 DISCLAIMER This document is an early draft of the Lake Huron Lakewide Action and Management Plan (LAMP) that has been released for public input. Under the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement, the Governments of Canada and the United States have committed to develop five- year management plans for each of the Great Lakes. This draft Lake Huron LAMP was developed by member agencies of the Lake Huron Partnership, a group of Federal, State, Provincial, Tribal governments and watershed management agencies with environmental protection and natural resource management responsibilities within the Lake Huron watershed. Public input is being sought on the factual content of the report. Our goal is to produce a report that will introduce the reader to the Lake Huron watershed and the principles of water quality management, as well as describe actions that governmental agencies and the public can take to further restore and protect the water quality of Lake Huron. The Lake Huron Partnership looks forward to considering your feedback as we proceed into the final drafting stage. Disclaimer: Do not quote or cite the contents of this draft document. The material in this draft has not undergone full agency review, therefore the accuracy of the data and/or conclusions should not be assumed. The current contents of this document should not be considered to reflect a formal position or commitment on the part of any Lake Huron Partnership agency, including United States Environmental Protection Agency and Environment and Climate Change Canada. LAKE HURON LAMP (2017-2021) │ DRAFT ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The ‘Draft’ 2017-2021 Lake Huron Lakewide Action and Management Plan (LAMP) was developed by member agencies of the Lake Huron Partnership and reflects the input of many resource management agencies, conservation authorities, scientists, and non-governmental organizations committed to restoring and protecting Lake Huron and its watershed.
  • District of Parry Sound Demographic Profile

    District of Parry Sound Demographic Profile

    District of Parry Sound Demographic Profile 2011 Census of Population Developed in partnership with District of Parry Sound Community Development Collaborative April, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES ..................................................................................................................... 3 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................... 5 REPORT PURPOSE ....................................................................................................................................... 5 METHODOLOGY .......................................................................................................................................... 6 REPORT PRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 6 NOTES ......................................................................................................................................................... 6 KEY FINDINGS.............................................................................................................................................. 8 Population............................................................................................................................................... 8 Age and Sex............................................................................................................................................