DOCSLIB.ORG

INTELSAT, LTD. (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
INTELSAT, LTD. (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter) Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K (Mark One) ☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 OR ☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission file number 000-50262 INTELSAT, LTD. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Bermuda 98-0346003 (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) Wellesley House North, 2nd Floor 90 Pitts Bay Road Pembroke, Bermuda HM 08 (Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code) (441) 294-1650 Registrant’s telephone number, including area code Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☒ Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐ Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ☒ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one): Large accelerated filer ☐ Accelerated filer ☐ Non-accelerated filer ☒ Smaller reporting company ☐ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒ The aggregate market value of the registrant’s voting stock held by non-affiliates is zero. The registrant is a privately held corporation. As of March 10, 2008, 12,000 common shares, par value $1.00 per share, were outstanding. Documents incorporated by reference: None Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Forward-Looking Statements 1 Part I Item 1. Business 3 Item 1A. Risk Factors 35 Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments 47 Item 2. Properties 47 Item 3. Legal Proceedings 48 Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders 48 Part II Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities 49 Item 6. Selected Financial Data 49 Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 51 Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 85 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data 86 Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure 87 Item 9A(T). Controls and Procedures 87 Item 9B. Other Information 87 Part III Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance 88 Item 11. Executive Compensation 91 Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters 109 Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence 110 Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services 113 Part IV Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules 114 Signatures 115 Index to Exhibits Index to Consolidated Financial Statements F-1 i Table of Contents FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS Some of the statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, or Annual Report, constitute forward-looking statements that do not directly or exclusively relate to historical facts. The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a “safe harbor” for certain forward-looking statements as long as they are identified as forward-looking and are accompanied by meaningful cautionary statements identifying important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the expectations expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements. When used in this Annual Report, the words “may,” “will,” “ might,” “should,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “project,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “intend,” “potential,” “outlook” and “continue,” and the negative of these terms, and other similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements and information. Examples of these forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding the following: our goal to sustain our leadership position in the fixed satellite services, or FSS, sector and enhance our free cash flow; our plan to expand the broadcast communities on selected satellites in our fleet; our belief that the direct-to-home transmission of television programming via satellite could contribute to future growth in the demand for satellite services as programmers seek to add programming to established networks and as new networks develop; our intent to continue to evaluate and pursue strategic transactions that can broaden our customer base, provide enhanced geographic presence, provide complementary technical and commercial capabilities, further utilize our infrastructure, modify our service application mix, and create operational efficiencies; our belief that our corporate network customers increasingly require managed services best addressed by a network that combines space and terrestrial infrastructure; our expectation that the FSS sector will experience moderate growth over the next few years; our expectation that near-term strategic opportunities in the FSS sector may involve smaller, regional or national satellite operators; with respect to video contribution services, our intent to expand our hybrid infrastructure to grow our business; our expectation that growth in high definition television programming will increase the demand for wholesale satellite capacity; the trends that we believe will impact our revenue and operating expenses in the future; our current assessment as to how long the Galaxy 27 satellite should be able to provide service on its transponders; our belief that the chances of an anomaly on the Galaxy 26 and IS-8 satellites similar to that on the Galaxy 27 satellite are low; our belief that there is no connection between the IS-804 satellite anomaly and the IS-802 and Galaxy 27 satellite anomalies and that the risk of an anomaly occurring to any one of our LM 7000 series satellites similar to anomalies that occurred on the IS-804 and IS-802 satellites is low; our current expectation that the Galaxy 27 satellite anomaly and the total loss of the IS-804 satellite will not result in the acceleration of capital expenditures to replace the Galaxy 27 and IS-804 satellites, respectively; our plans for satellite launches in the near term; our expected capital expenditures in 2008 and during the next several years; our belief that our balanced geographic mix provides some protection from adverse regional economic conditions; the impact on our financial position or results of operations of pending legal proceedings; and the impact of the New Sponsors Acquisition Transactions and the PanAmSat Acquisition Transactions, each as defined in Item 1—Business. The forward-looking statements made in this Annual Report reflect our intentions, plans, expectations, assumptions and beliefs about future events. These forward-looking statements speak only as of their dates and are not guarantees of future performance or results and are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside of our control. These factors could cause actual results or developments to differ materially from the expectations expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements and include known and unknown risks. Known risks include, among others, the risks discussed in Item 1A—Risk Factors, the political, economic and legal conditions in the markets we are targeting for communications services or in which we operate and other risks and uncertainties inherent in the telecommunications business in general and the satellite communications business in particular. 1 Table of Contents Other factors that may cause results or developments to differ materially from the forward-looking statements made in this Annual Report include, but are not limited to: • risks associated with operating our in-orbit satellites; • satellite launch failures, satellite launch and construction delays and in-orbit failures or reduced performance; • our ability to obtain new satellite insurance policies with financially viable insurance carriers on commercially reasonable terms or at all, as well as the ability of our insurance carriers to fulfill their obligations; • possible future losses on satellites that are not adequately covered by insurance; • domestic and international government regulation; • changes in our revenue backlog or expected revenue backlog for future services; • pricing pressure and overcapacity in the markets in which we compete; • inadequate access to capital
Load more

Recommended publications
  • MFS Meridian® Funds
    Shareholder Semiannual Report 31 July 2021 MFS Meridian® Funds Luxembourg-Registered SICAV RCS: B0039346 SICAV-UK-SEM-7/21 MFS Meridian® Funds CONTENTS General information .................................................................... 3 Shareholder complaints or inquiries .......................................................... 3 Schedules of investments ................................................................. 4 Statements of assets and liabilities ........................................................... 130 Statements of operations and changes in net assets ............................................... 135 Statistical information ................................................................... 140 Notes to financial statements .............................................................. 179 Addendum .......................................................................... 217 Directors and administration ............................................................... 223 Primary local agents ................................................................ back cover MFS Meridian® Funds listing The following sub-funds comprise the MFS Meridian Funds family. Each sub-fund name is preceded with “MFS Meridian Funds –” which may not be stated throughout this report. Asia Ex-Japan Fund ® Blended Research European Equity Fund Continental European Equity Fund Contrarian Value Fund Diversified Income Fund Emerging Markets Debt Fund Emerging Markets Debt Local Currency Fund Emerging Markets Equity Fund Emerging Markets
    [Show full text]
  • Space Business Review International Mobile Telecommunications Services, Including Wimax
    December 2007 - SPECIAL EDITION: THE TOP-10 SPACE BUSINESS STORIES OF 2007 - #1 - M&A Transactions Keep Pace #5 - 50th Anniversary of Sputnik Despite challenging credit markets, merger, As we celebrate the 50th anniversary of the acquisition and investment activity kept pace in satellite that introduced the “space age”, 2007. Abertis & Caisse des Dépôts et approximately 1,000 satellites now orbit the consignations purchase 32% (€1.07B) and Earth and the space business has grown to 25.5% (€862.7M) stakes, respectively, in more than $100 billion in annual revenues. Eutelsat (Jan.). GE Capital sells back its 19.5% #6 - Satellite Manufacturers Remain Busy interest in SES Global for €588 million in cash 18 commercial satellite orders announced in and assets including stakes in AsiaSat, Star 2007. Ball Aerospace & Technologies: One and Orbcomm (Feb.). JSAT & SKY WorldView-2. EADS Astrium: YahSat 1A Perfect Communications merge (March). BC and 1B, Arabsat 5A, BADR-5 (the foregoing Partners to acquire Intelsat Ltd. for $16.4 billion, in cooperation with Thales Alenia Space) including debt (June). Carlyle Group to acquire and Alphasat 1-XL. Israel Aerospace ARINC (July). Apax Partners France Industries: Amos-4. Lockheed Martin purchases Telenor Satellite Services for $400 Commercial Space Systems: JCSAT-12. million (Sept.). Loral Space & Orbital Sciences Corporation: Optus-D3, Communications and PSP Canada conclude AMC-5R. Space Systems/Loral: Nimiq 5, C$3.25 billion acquisition of Telesat Canada ProtoStar I, Intelsat 14, SIRIUS FM-6, Abertis to acquire 28.4% stake in Hispasat EchoStar XIV, NSS-12. Thales Alenia (Nov.). CIP Canada Investment, indirectly Space: THOR 6, Palapa-D.
    [Show full text]
  • SUBDOC-034 Self Assessment of Soundness.Pdf
    Local Development Plan Draft Plan Strategy Self-Assessment of Soundness December 2020 0 Contents Page 1.0 Introduction 3 2.0 Tests of Soundness 4 3.0 Procedural Tests 5 4.0 Consistency Tests 20 5.0 Coherence and Effectiveness Tests 31 6.0 Conclusion 38 1 Appendices Page Appendix 1 Test of Soundness 40 Appendix 2 LDP Timetable 41 Appendix 3 LDP Timetable Approval from DfI 45 Appendix 4 LDP Timetable Consultee Notification 49 Appendix 5 LDP Statutory Consultees 53 Appendix 6 LDP Non-Statutory Consultees 58 Appendix 7 LDP Stakeholder Group 59 Appendix 8 LDP Community / Voluntary Groups Consultees 60 Appendix 9 LDP Section 75 Groups Consultees 62 Appendix 10 POP Public Notice 64 Appendix 11 DPS Local Advertisement 66 Appendix 12 DPS Public Notice in the Belfast Gazette 70 Appendix 13 DPS Documents Available on Council’s Website 74 Appendix 14 PAC response to LDP Timetable 76 Appendix 15 LDP Timetable Public Notice 79 Appendix 16 LDP Timetable published on Council Website 84 Appendix 17 Meetings with Consultation Bodies 86 Appendix 18 Pre-POP Publication Consultation Notification 89 Appendix 19 POP Notification of Publication letter (Consultees) 90 Appendix 20 POP Publication on Council’s Website 92 Appendix 21 DPS Publication Notification Letter 94 Appendix 22 DPS Publication on Council’s Website 96 Appendix 23 Publication of Reps & Counter Reps Period Public Notice in Belfast Gazette 98 Appendix 24 Publication of Reps & Counter Reps Period Local Advertisement 99 Appendix 25 Notification to Consultees that Reps have been published 101 Appendix
    [Show full text]
  • The Boeing Company 2002 Annual Report
    The Boeing Company 200220022002 AnnualAnnualAnnual ReportReportReport Vision 2016: People working together as a global enterprise for aerospace leadership. Strategies Core Competencies Values Run healthy core businesses Detailed customer knowledge Leadership Leverage strengths into new and focus Integrity products and services Large-scale system integration Quality Open new frontiers Lean enterprise Customer satisfaction People working together A diverse and involved team Good corporate citizenship Enhancing shareholder value The Boeing Company Table of Contents Founded in 1916, Boeing evokes vivid images of the amazing products 1 Operational Highlights and services that define aerospace. Each day, more than three million 2 Message to Shareholders passengers board 42,300 flights on Boeing jetliners, more than 345 8 Corporate Essay satellites put into orbit by Boeing launch vehicles pass overhead, and 16 Corporate Governance 6,000 Boeing military aircraft stand guard with air forces of 23 countries 18 Commercial Airplanes and every branch of the U.S. armed forces. 20 Integrated Defense Systems We are the leading aerospace company in the world and a top U.S. 22 Boeing Capital Corporation exporter. We hold more than 6,000 patents, and our capabilities and 24 Air Traffic Management related services include formulation of system-of-systems solutions, 26 Phantom Works advanced information and communications systems, financial services, 28 Connexion by BoeingSM homeland security, defense systems, missiles, rocket engines, launch 30 Shared Services Group systems and satellites. 32 Financials But Boeing is about much more than statistics or products, no matter 88 Selected Products, how awe-inspiring. It’s also about the enterprising spirit of our people Programs and Services working together to provide customers the best solutions possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Intelsat Satellites Supporting Approximately 50 Channels, Our Intelsatonesm Terrestrial Infrastructure and Other Production Capabilities; And
    Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K (Mark One) ☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 OR ☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission file number 000-50262 INTELSAT S.A. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Luxembourg 98-0346003 (State or Other Jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Incorporation or Organization) Identification No.) 4, rue Albert Borschette Luxembourg L-1246 (Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code) +352 27-84-1600 (Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☒ Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☒ No ☐ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☐ No ☒* Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Download
    October 2006 Volume V, Issue VI www.boeing.com/frontiers LOOKING AHEAD Meet the Advanced Systems organization A SKILLED BUILD 16 of IDS, where Boeing employees are Determinant assembly helps 777 line developing new-technology solutions to support its defense, security, space and THAT FEELS BETTER 28 new market customers A look at Boeing’s wellness resources A QUALITY DECISION 34 Streamlined process aids Boeing, suppliers October 2006 Volume V, Issue VI ON THE COVER: The A160 Hummingbird. Photo by Bob Ferguson O T O BOB FERGUSON PH COVER STORY MOVING AHEAD 12 Employees in the Advanced Systems organization of Integrated Defense Systems—such as those working on the Orbital Express ASTRO demonstration satellite in Huntington Beach, Calif. (above)—are developing future capabilities to support defense, security and other customers. What’s in your wellness toolkit? Boeing offers employees wellness FEELING 28 “tools” from information to services to fitness opportunities. These re- FEATURE sources allow employees to focus on the wellness of themselves and their fam- BETTER ily members. That helps employees be more productive at work and at home. STORY BOEING FRONTIERS October 2006 3 October 2006 Volume V, Issue VI O T O The new 777 Accurate Floor Grid–Determinant T PH Assembly Process gives mechanics easier access R during assembly. It also requires significantly less CKHA 16 O space than the previous three-story tooling struc- L N ture used to build up 777 floor grids. IA R MA COMMERCIAL AIRPLANES INTEGRATED DEFENSE SYSTEMS Parts of a tool What’s the big idea Members of the Manufacturing Engineering team Boeing is developing a high-capacity miniature 16 in Everett, Wash., came up with an idea to improve 20 satellite.
    [Show full text]
  • Update of the Space and Launch Insurance Industry
    Commercial Space Transportation QUARTERLY LAUNCH REPORT Special Report: Update of the Space and Launch Insurance Industry 4th Quarter 1998 United States Department of Transportation • Federal Aviation Administration Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation 800 Independence Ave. SW Room 331 Washington, D.C. 20591 Special Report SR-1 Update of the Space and Launch Insurance Industry INTRODUCTION at risk, insurance is essential to mitigate the high cost of a failure. Insurance is a basic requirement for the maintenance of a commercial space industry. Certain types of space insurance, such as Space activity mishaps can result in hundreds third party liability insurance, protect the of millions of dollars of expenses. Two general public from the hazards of space recent launch vehicles that failed (a Titan 4A activity. The U.S. Federal Aviation and the initial Delta 3) were valued at $1.3 Administration, through the Commercial billion and $225 million respectively Space Launch Act Amendments of 1988, (inclusive of payload). The replacement cost requires third party liability insurance as a of the recently failed Galaxy 4 satellite, for condition for the issuance of a commercial example, was in the range of $200 to $250 launch license. Under the 1972 United million. In addition, consequences of Nations Convention on International Liability mishaps will typically extend beyond the cost for Damage Caused by Space Objects, of a satellite and launch vehicle. Business governments are liable for injury or damage operations can be delayed, possibly resulting to third parties, caused by launch vehicles or in the deferral of a satellite venture’s vital payloads launched under their jurisdiction.
    [Show full text]
  • Case 20-32299-KLP Doc 208 Filed 06/01/20 Entered 06/01/20 16
    Case 20-32299-KLP Doc 208 Filed 06/01/20 Entered 06/01/20 16:57:32 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 137 Case 20-32299-KLP Doc 208 Filed 06/01/20 Entered 06/01/20 16:57:32 Desc Main Document Page 2 of 137 Exhibit A Case 20-32299-KLP Doc 208 Filed 06/01/20 Entered 06/01/20 16:57:32 Desc Main Document Page 3 of 137 Exhibit A1 Served via Overnight Mail Name Attention Address 1 Address 2 City State Zip Country Aastha Broadcasting Network Limited Attn: Legal Unit213 MezzanineFl Morya LandMark1 Off Link Road, Andheri (West) Mumbai 400053 IN Abs Global LTD Attn: Legal O'Hara House 3 Bermudiana Road Hamilton HM08 BM Abs-Cbn Global Limited Attn: Legal Mother Ignacia Quezon City Manila PH Aditya Jain S/O Sudhir Kumar Jain Attn: Legal 12, Printing Press Area behind Punjab Kesari Wazirpur Delhi 110035 IN AdminNacinl TelecomunicacionUruguay Complejo Torre De Telecomuniciones Guatemala 1075. Nivel 22 HojaDeEntrada 1000007292 5000009660 Montevideo CP 11800 UY Advert Bereau Company Limited Attn: Legal East Legon Ars Obojo Road Asafoatse Accra GH Africa Digital Network Limited c/o Nation Media Group Nation Centre 7th Floor Kimathi St PO Box 28753-00100 Nairobi KE Africa Media Group Limited Attn: Legal Jamhuri/Zaramo Streets Dar Es Salaam TZ Africa Mobile Network Communication Attn: Legal 2 Jide Close, Idimu Council Alimosho Lagos NG Africa Mobile Networks Cameroon Attn: Legal 131Rue1221 Entree Des Hydrocarbures Derriere Star Land Hotel Bonapriso-Douala Douala CM Africa Mobile Networks Cameroon Attn: Legal BP12153 Bonapriso Douala CM Africa Mobile Networks Gb,
    [Show full text]
  • 59864 Federal Register/Vol. 85, No. 185/Wednesday, September 23
    59864 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 185 / Wednesday, September 23, 2020 / Rules and Regulations FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS C. Congressional Review Act II. Report and Order COMMISSION 2. The Commission has determined, A. Allocating FTEs 47 CFR Part 1 and the Administrator of the Office of 5. In the FY 2020 NPRM, the Information and Regulatory Affairs, Commission proposed that non-auctions [MD Docket No. 20–105; FCC 20–120; FRS Office of Management and Budget, funded FTEs will be classified as direct 17050] concurs that these rules are non-major only if in one of the four core bureaus, under the Congressional Review Act, 5 i.e., in the Wireline Competition Assessment and Collection of U.S.C. 804(2). The Commission will Bureau, the Wireless Regulatory Fees for Fiscal Year 2020 send a copy of this Report & Order to Telecommunications Bureau, the Media Congress and the Government Bureau, or the International Bureau. The AGENCY: Federal Communications indirect FTEs are from the following Commission. Accountability Office pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A). bureaus and offices: Enforcement ACTION: Final rule. Bureau, Consumer and Governmental 3. In this Report and Order, we adopt Affairs Bureau, Public Safety and SUMMARY: In this document, the a schedule to collect the $339,000,000 Homeland Security Bureau, Chairman Commission revises its Schedule of in congressionally required regulatory and Commissioners’ offices, Office of Regulatory Fees to recover an amount of fees for fiscal year (FY) 2020. The the Managing Director, Office of General $339,000,000 that Congress has required regulatory fees for all payors are due in Counsel, Office of the Inspector General, the Commission to collect for fiscal year September 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Term Disruptions and Transformative Impacts of 5G and Beyond Wireless Networks: Lessons Learnt from the Development of a 5G Testbed Environment
    This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2964673, IEEE Access Date of publication xxxx 00, 0000, date of current version xxxx 00, 0000. Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/XYZ.2019.DOI The Potential Short- and Long-Term Disruptions and Transformative Impacts of 5G and Beyond Wireless Networks: Lessons Learnt from the Development of a 5G Testbed Environment MOHMAMMAD N. PATWARY1, (Senior Member, IEEE), SYED JUNAID NAWAZ2, (Senior Member, IEEE), MD. ABDUR RAHMAN3, (Senior Member, IEEE), SHREE KRISHNA SHARMA4, (Senior Member, IEEE), MD MAMUNUR RASHID5, STUART J. BARNES5 1School of Computing and Digital Technology, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, UK. (e-mail:[email protected]) 2Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, COMSATS University Islamabad (CUI), Islamabad 45550, Pakistan. (e-mail:[email protected]) 3Department of Cyber Security and Forensic Computing, The University of Prince Mugrin, KSA. (e-mail: [email protected]) 4SnT - securityandtrust.lu, University of Luxembourg, Kirchberg, Luxembourg 1855, Luxembourg. (e-mail: [email protected]) 5Consumer and Organisational Data Analytics (CODA) Research Centre, King’s College London, UK. (e-mail: [email protected] and [email protected] ) Corresponding author: Syed Junaid Nawaz (e-mail: [email protected]). ABSTRACT The capacity and coverage requirements for 5th generation (5G) and beyond wireless connectivity will be significantly different from the predecessor networks. To meet these requirements, the anticipated deployment cost in the United Kingdom (UK) is predicted to be between £30bn and £50bn, whereas the current annual capital expenditure (CapEX) of the mobile network operators (MNOs) is £2.5bn.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Power Workshop 2009 Power Subsystem Failures
    Space Power Workshop 2009 Power Subsystem Failures: Stories of Arcs and Sparks Paul Timmerman April 21, 2009 SPW2009 PJT Outline • Battery Failures • Main Power Bus Failures • Pyro Related Problems • Power Electronics Problems • Power Converter Troubles • G-Switch Issues • Corona Induced Failures • Failure Survey (Arrays, Batteries, Other) • Bibliography 2 SPW2009 PJT 2 Ranger Battery Venting during Test • Incident – 1800WH Ag-Zn battery experienced cell short due to dendrite growth during system thermo-vac testing, forcing emergency venting procedure • Causes – Intrinsic properties of Ag-Zn battery chemistry – Solubility of reactants lead to separator penetration by dendritic short circuits • Resolution – Battery technician dons rain coat and goggle, arms himself with a electric drill, goes into chamber, pulls battery, carries out back behind building and creates a vent in the battery case, releasing plume of hot, concentrated potassium hydroxide gas and liquids. • Lesson – Whenever possible, avoid Ag-Zn batteries SPW2009 PJT 3 Ranger Venting During Flight • Incident – In 1971, Mariner Mars experienced an unexpected battery venting causing a brief critical pressure region around the high voltage Canopus star tracker, resulting in a corona discharge. The arc caused a ground-loop current spike that resulted in the permanent loss of 22 telemetry channels in the Flight Data Subsystem (FDS). • Cause – Use of Silver Zinc batteries – Primitive state of battery charger electronics • Lesson – Don’t fly Silver-Zinc Batteries SPW2009 PJT 4 Magellan
    [Show full text]
  • Evolved Expendable Launch Operations at Cape Canaveral, 2002-2009
    EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH OPERATIONS AT CAPE CANAVERAL 2002 – 2009 by Mark C. Cleary 45th SPACE WING History Office PREFACE This study addresses ATLAS V and DELTA IV Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle (EELV) operations at Cape Canaveral, Florida. It features all the EELV missions launched from the Cape through the end of Calendar Year (CY) 2009. In addition, the first chapter provides an overview of the EELV effort in the 1990s, summaries of EELV contracts and requests for facilities at Cape Canaveral, deactivation and/or reconstruction of launch complexes 37 and 41 to support EELV operations, typical EELV flight profiles, and military supervision of EELV space operations. The lion’s share of this work highlights EELV launch campaigns and the outcome of each flight through the end of 2009. To avoid confusion, ATLAS V missions are presented in Chapter II, and DELTA IV missions appear in Chapter III. Furthermore, missions are placed in three categories within each chapter: 1) commercial, 2) civilian agency, and 3) military space operations. All EELV customers employ commercial launch contractors to put their respective payloads into orbit. Consequently, the type of agency sponsoring a payload (the Air Force, NASA, NOAA or a commercial satellite company) determines where its mission summary is placed. Range officials mark all launch times in Greenwich Mean Time, as indicated by a “Z” at various points in the narrative. Unfortunately, the convention creates a one-day discrepancy between the local date reported by the media and the “Z” time’s date whenever the launch occurs late at night, but before midnight. (This proved true for seven of the military ATLAS V and DELTA IV missions presented here.) In any event, competent authorities have reviewed all the material presented in this study, and it is releasable to the general public.
    [Show full text]