DOCSLIB.ORG

N/A Local Plan Central Bedfordshire

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
N/A Local Plan Central Bedfordshire Date: 22 February 2018 Our ref: 236021 Your ref: n/a Customer Services Local Plan Hornbeam House Crewe Business Park Central Bedfordshire Council Electra Way Priory House Crewe Monks Walk Cheshire Chicksands CW1 6GJ Shefford SG17 5TQ [email protected] BY EMAIL ONLY Dear Sir/Madam Central Bedfordshire Pre-Submission Local Plan Consultation Thank you for your consultation regarding the above, dated 11 January 2018, which was received by Natural England on the same date. Natural England is a non-departmental public body. Our statutory purpose is to ensure that the natural environment is conserved, enhanced, and managed for the benefit of present and future generations, thereby contributing to sustainable development. Local Plan – Pre-submission Consultation Natural England welcomes the inclusion of amendments to address some of our comments at the draft Local Plan Regulation 18 stage (in our letter of response dated 29 August 2018 (our ref: 220143)). We re-iterate our previous outstanding advice regarding policies and specific allocations in Annex1 and Annex 2, respectively to this letter. Please note that we have not reiterated previous supporting or general advice comments. With regard to Natural England’s interests we generally consider the Local Plan to be sound and legally compliant. However, we have highlighted a number of policies where amendments are required, in particular to Policy SA1: Land North of Luton, to ensure that development will deliver sufficient mitigation to demonstrate no adverse impact to designated sites and landscape, including the setting of the Chilterns AONB. This is required to ensure that the policy is sound and consistent with the requirements of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) to protect nationally designated sites and landscapes. Habitats Regulations Assessment Natural England welcomes submission of the Habitats Regulations Assessment (HRA) Screening Report prepared by Enfusion (December 2017). With regard to increased recreational pressure we agree that due to distance and the mitigation measures afforded through policies EE1, EE2, EE3 and EE13 the Local Plan alone, and in- combination, is unlikely to have any adverse effect on Chiltern Beechwoods Special Area of Page 1 of 13 Conservation (SAC) and the Upper Nene Valley Gravel Pits Special Protection Area (SPA) and Ramsar site. Natural England is satisfied that with the mitigation afforded through relevant Plan polices, adverse impacts to European sites alone, and in-combination, through changes in water level, water quality and air quality can be avoided. However, our advice remains that the Local Plan should take a strategic approach to water quality and air quality issues through an up to date Water Cycle Study and Air Quality Assessment to demonstrate that allocations are sustainable and that sufficient mitigation is deliverable to ensure no adverse effects to designated sites. We agree that, due to distance, there are no potential pathways for impacts to European sites through habitat loss and fragmentation. Natural England therefore supports the conclusion of the HRA that the Central Bedfordshire Local Plan is unlikely to give rise to significant effects on European sites hence further Appropriate Assessment is not required. Sustainability Appraisal (SA) Natural England is satisfied that the SA objectives, assessment methodology and framework generally accord with the requirements of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 and the Strategic Environmental Assessment Regulations. We welcome the incorporation of the summary findings of the Habitats Regulations Assessment (HRA) into the revised Sustainability Appraisal (SA) report (Enfusion, January 2018), in line with our previous advice. However, we cannot agree with the conclusions of the SA as we have significant outstanding concerns in relation to: the lack of proper assessment of the impacts of development on the AONB, including the production of an LVIA the need for the Sustainability Appraisal to be informed by an updated Water Cycle Study The need for the Sustainability Appraisal to properly address the impact of increased recreational pressure on designated sites. We understand that the HRA has concluded that the Draft Plan will not have likely significant effects, individually or in-combination, on the identified European Sites. We welcome, in line with our previous advice, that the assessment has considered the potential for impacts to European sites beyond the district boundary, in accordance with the requirements of the Habitats Regulations. To reiterate our comments at the previous consultation stage, section 4.10 indicates that despite mitigation to address negative effects through the emerging development management policies, uncertainty of the significance of effects remains until further studies on the water cycle and transport impacts/capacities are completed. Natural England again advises that these studies should be completed as soon as possible to provide the evidence required to inform the SA and enable sound judgements to be made regarding which allocations are sustainable and can be taken forward. We note that paragraph 70 of the SA Technical Summary report states that there are uncertainties in relation to some of the negative cumulative impacts on the AONB from the proposed development North of Luton and given the scale of the proposed development we advise that further work is required to understand the cumulative impacts and to determine whether the impacts can be mitigated. As previously advised, the SA cannot rely alone on the emerging development management policies to mitigate the potential adverse effects of proposals on the natural environment, including designated sites and landscapes. An up to date Stage 2 Water Cycle Study, Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (LVIA) and assessment of air quality and recreational pressure should be provided to inform the SA and demonstrate that allocations will not have any adverse effect on the Chilterns Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) or its setting and designated nature conservation and geological sites. Agricultural Land Classification (ALC surveys) are also required, where possible, to assess the impacts of allocations on best and most valuable land (BMV land) and identify measures to mitigate adverse effects. Page 2 of 13 For any queries relating to the specific advice in this letter only please contact Louise Oliver on . For any new consultations, or to provide further information on this consultation please send your correspondences to [email protected]. Yours faithfully John Torlesse Manager enc Page 3 of 13 Annex 1: Central Bedfordshire Draft Local Plan (2015-35) Natural England Detailed Comments Central Bedfordshire Draft Local Plan Section 2.3.2 In accordance with paragraph 111 of the NPPF we advise that the re-use of brownfield land needs to make explicit that brownfield land will be brought forward for development provided that it is not of high environmental value. This should be inherent in the site allocation process and development management policies. Vision and Objectives We would expect the Vision for Central Bedfordshire 2035 to aspire to a high quality natural environment, rather than just a high quality landscape. Section 7.5 Spatial Strategy Approach We welcome recognition of the environmental constraints and opportunities across the district such as Greensand Ridge NIA and the proposed extension to Forest of Marston Vale. The Plan includes generic policies to protect and enhance these areas; however, relevant site allocations policies will need to include robust requirements to deliver specific mitigation and enhancement measures in these areas, along with a clear mechanism for their delivery / funding. Section 8.5 Summary of Housing Growth Locations A number of allocation policies include land within or close to sites designated as SSSI. Natural England will object to any allocation where policy requirements are not sufficiently robust to demonstrate that development will not have an adverse effect on a SSSI. As previously advised the SA should have carefully assessed the potential impacts of development in these locations, alone and cumulatively, on the natural environment, including designated sites. Potential pathways for impacts include increased recreational pressure, changes in air quality and changes in water quantity and water quality should have been assessed in detail through the SA and recommendations for mitigation measures to address adverse effects, and a mechanism for their funding / delivery identified. These recommendations should then have been translated into robust policy requirements. We have provided further advice on this in our comments on the SA and site allocation policies below. Policy SA1: Land North of Luton and proposals in Barton-le-Clay are within / within the setting of, the Chilterns AONB. A Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (LVIA) has yet to be undertaken to assess the impact of development in these locations on the AONB and its setting, and to identify whether mitigation measures could adequately address adverse effects. Our advice, in the context of paragraphs 115 and 116 of the NPPF, is that a new link road or new housing in the AONB would be classed as major development. Consequently any proposals taken forward in these locations will need to: demonstrate need for the development in that location, including national considerations and the impact of permitting it, or refusing
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Covanta Rookery Pit Incinerator - Reference No EPR/WP3234DY/A001
    Covanta Rookery Pit Incinerator - Reference No EPR/WP3234DY/A001 Dear Sirs I am writing to you on behalf of Bedfordshire Against Covanta Incinerator (BACI) - A coalition of Residents, Parish & Borough Councillors and Action Groups members who are proactively expressing their concern and - where appropriate - protesting against the Covanta Incinerator at Rookery Pit. There is a great deal of public interest in this development as demonstrated by the following: 3,626 people have signed our petition located at https://www.gopetition.com/petitions/stop-covanta- building-an-efw-incinerator-plant.html - paper copy available if requested in writing Our Facebook group member numbers are currently 1,448 Our website has received 8,287 visits since its launch in November 2016 We believe that a permit should not be granted by the Environment Agency to Covanta to operate an Incineration Plant to be located at Rookery Pit South, Bedfordshire. There are a great many factors involved in this development the Environment Agency must take into consideration. These include: Covanta as an operator, Veolia as a supplier, the time elapsed since planning approval, the local area weather issues, the local area impacts, impacts further afield, Greenhouse Gases impact/Carbon Budget and Government Policies. Since the Covanta Incinerator received planning permission in 2011 there have been a number of new and updated Governmental and EU policies regarding the Environment that will have significance in this permit decision. These include (but are not limited to) - Natural Environment White Paper, the England Biodiversity Strategy, Water for Life, the Waste Policy Review, the National Climate Change Adaptation Programme, the revised EU air quality standards and the Green Book: valuation of energy use and greenhouse gas emissions.
    [Show full text]
  • Maulden Green Infrastructure Plan Has Been Produced As Part of the Development of a Neighbourhood Plan for the Parish of Maulden
    Maulden Green Infrastructure Plan November 2018 (updated September 2019) Produced by The Greensand Trust on behalf of the Maulden Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group and Maulden Parish Council CONTENTS Sec. Section Title Page Acknowledgements 3 1 Introduction 3 1.1.1 The Parish of Maulden 3 2 Green Infrastructure 4 2.1 Definition of Green Infrastructure 4 2.2 Green Infrastructure Planning 4 2.3 What is a Parish Green Infrastructure Plan? 5 2.4 How does it achieve this? 5 2.5 How the Parish GI Plan fits with the Neighbourhood Plan 5 2.6 How the Parish GI Plan fits with the Strategic and District GI Plans 6 2.7 How the Parish GI Plan fits with other Parish GI Plans 6 2.8 How the Parish GI Plan can be used 6 3 Methodology 7 4 Community Consultation 7 5 Thematic Information 8 5.1 Landscape 9 5.1.1 Landscape Policy Recommendations 11 5.2 Biodiversity 11 5.2.1 Biodiversity Policy Recommendations 13 5.3 Historic Environment 13 5.3.1 Historic Environment Policy Recommendations 15 5.4 Open Space, Access and Recreation 16 5.4.1 Quantity of Greenspace 18 5.4.2 Assessing Accessibility 19 5.4.3 Quality Assessment 20 5.4.4 Local Green Space Assessment 20 5.4.5 Open Space, Access and Recreation Policy Recommendations 21 6 Project Prioritisation 21 7 The Maulden GI Network 22 7.1 Green Infrastructure Policy Recommendation 22 Map 1 Context 3 Map 2 Landscape 10 Map 3 Biodiversity 12 Map 4 Historic Environment 14 Map 5 Open Space, Access & Recreation 16 Map 5a Access to Green Space 19 Map 6 The Maulden GI Network 23 Appendix 1 Consultation Summary – see separate document Appendix 2 Local Green Space Assessment – see separate document Appendix 3 Action Plan 24 2 Acknowledgements The Greensand Trust would like to thank the following for their assistance in producing this plan: The Maulden Neighbourhood Plan Environment Group & Steering Group and the Parish Council The residents of Maulden The Biodiversity Recording and Monitoring Centre 1.
    [Show full text]
  • T1)E Bedford,1)Ire Naturaii,T 45
    T1)e Bedford,1)ire NaturaIi,t 45 Journal for the year 1990 Bedfordshire Natural History Society 1991 'ISSN 0951 8959 I BEDFORDSHffiE NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY 1991 Chairman: Mr D. Anderson, 88 Eastmoor Park, Harpenden, Herts ALS 1BP Honorary Secretary: Mr M.C. Williams, 2 Ive! Close, Barton-le-Clay, Bedford MK4S 4NT Honorary Treasurer: MrJ.D. Burchmore, 91 Sundon Road, Harlington, Dunstable, Beds LUS 6LW Honorary Editor (Bedfordshire Naturalist): Mr C.R. Boon, 7 Duck End Lane, Maulden, Bedford MK4S 2DL Honorary Membership Secretary: Mrs M.]. Sheridan, 28 Chestnut Hill, Linslade, Leighton Buzzard, Beds LU7 7TR Honorary Scientific Committee Secretary: Miss R.A. Brind, 46 Mallard Hill, Bedford MK41 7QS Council (in addition to the above): Dr A. Aldhous MrS. Cham DrP. Hyman DrD. Allen MsJ. Childs Dr P. Madgett MrC. Baker Mr W. Drayton MrP. Soper Honorary Editor (Muntjac): Ms C. Aldridge, 9 Cowper Court, Markyate, Herts AL3 8HR Committees appointed by Council: Finance: Mr]. Burchmore (Sec.), MrD. Anderson, Miss R. Brind, Mrs M. Sheridan, Mr P. Wilkinson, Mr M. Williams. Scientific: Miss R. Brind (Sec.), Mr C. Boon, Dr G. Bellamy, Mr S. Cham, Miss A. Day, DrP. Hyman, MrJ. Knowles, MrD. Kramer, DrB. Nau, MrE. Newman, Mr A. Outen, MrP. Trodd. Development: Mrs A. Adams (Sec.), MrJ. Adams (Chairman), Ms C. Aldridge (Deputy Chairman), Mrs B. Chandler, Mr M. Chandler, Ms]. Childs, Mr A. Dickens, MrsJ. Dickens, Mr P. Soper. Programme: MrJ. Adams, Mr C. Baker, MrD. Green, MrD. Rands, Mrs M. Sheridan. Trustees (appointed under Rule 13): Mr M. Chandler, Mr D. Green, Mrs B.
    [Show full text]
  • Bedfordshire Naturalist
    The BEDFORDSHIRE NATURALIST BEING THE JOURNAL OF THE BEDFORDSHIRE NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY AND FIELD CLUB FOR THE YEAR 1958 No. 13 Price Five Shillings PUBLISHED BY THE BEDFORDSHIRE NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY & FIELD CLUB BEDFORD STONEBRIDGES PRINTERS LIMITED 1959 BEDFORDSHIRE NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY & FIELD CLUB 1959 President I. G. DONY, Ph.D. Past Presidents SIR FREDERICK MANDER, M.A., B.Sc. OLIVER G. PIKE, F.R.P.S., M.B.O.D. MAJOR SIMON WHITBREAD, B.A., D.L., I.P. Chairman F. G. R. SOPER, I.P. Hon. General Secretary HENRY A. S. KEY, M.P.S., 61B GOLDINGTON ROAD, BEDFORD. Hon. Programme Secretary L. A. SPEED, 226 GOLDINGTON ROAD, BEDFORD. Hon. Treasurer I. M. DYMOND, 91 PUTNOE LANE, BEDFORD. Hon. Editor A. W. GUPPY, 53 GRANGE LANE, BROMHAM. Hon. Librarian MISS E. PROCTOR, B.Sc., THE NATURE ROOM, 4 THE AVENUE, BEDFORD. Council W. DURANT MIssE. PROCTOR A. I. DYMOND- (Co-opted) S. W. RODELL I. I. N. FERGUSON-LEES MISS G. M. TATTAM W. G. HARPER R. G. STEPHENSON E. MEADOWS B. B. WEST K. E. WEST RECORDERS BOTANY: Except Fungi: I. G. Dony, Ph.D., 41 Somerset Avenue, Luton. Fungi: D. A. Reid, B.Sc., The Herbarium, Royal Botanical Gardens, METEOROLOGY: Kew. A. W. -Guppy, B.Sc., .53 Grange Lane, Bromham. PALAEONTOLOGY: P. I., Smart, F.R.E.S., 1 Laburnum Avenue, Bedford. ZOOWGY: Crustacea: Miss E. Proctor, B.Sc., 253 Goldington Road, Bedford. Insecta: Hymenoptera: V. H. Chambers, Ph.D., 47 Westbourne Road, Luton. Lepidoptera: B. B. West, 37 Cardington Road, Bedford. Odonata: K. E. West, 37 Cardington Road, Bedford.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham E-Theses
    Durham E-Theses Ecological Changes in the British Flora WALKER, KEVIN,JOHN How to cite: WALKER, KEVIN,JOHN (2009) Ecological Changes in the British Flora, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/121/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk Ecological Changes in the British Flora Kevin John Walker B.Sc., M.Sc. School of Biological and Biomedical Sciences University of Durham 2009 This thesis is submitted in candidature for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Dedicated to Terry C. E. Wells (1935-2008) With thanks for the help and encouragement so generously given over the last ten years Plate 1 Pulsatilla vulgaris , Barnack Hills and Holes, Northamptonshire Photo: K.J. Walker Contents ii Contents List of tables vi List of figures viii List of plates x Declaration xi Abstract xii 1.
    [Show full text]
  • DRAFT Bedfordshire Butterflies Report for 2019
    DRAFT 2019 Bedfordshire Butterfly Report destined to be published in Bedfordshire Naturalist The photographs herein are only to illustrate this DRAFT – others will be sought for publication Butterflies 2019 Keith Balmer With no exceptionally warm days in January it was a quiet month for butterflies with just a Red Admiral seen on the 8th and a Peacock on the 28th. February was a much warmer month which elicited a lot more activity. The first Small Tortoiseshell was seen on the 5th, Brimstone on the 9th and Comma on the 15th. By the 24th the balmy weather had also brought out a Large White and three Small Whites. The counts by the end of February were extraordinary: Brimstone 245, Comma 54, Large White 1, Peacock 14, Red Admiral 30, Small Tortoiseshell 61, Small White 4, making a total of 409 adults and seven species! March was another warm month resulting in an advanced start to the season for four more species: Speckled Wood on the 2nd, Orange Tip and Holly Blue on the 24th, and Green-veined White on the 29th. On the 30th a Painted Lady was seen in the van of a strong migration which saw large numbers arrive in the UK later in the year. 12 species and 706 butterflies were reported during March. April opened with another early sighting, a Green Hairstreak on the 1st. Small Copper showed next on the 15th, followed by Grizzled Skipper on the 19th, Duke of Burgundy on the 20th, Small Heath on the 21st and Dingy Skipper on the 22nd. Fine weather in week 16 (16th to 22nd April) produced a large volume of sightings and resultant spike in the weekly data.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report and Accounts 2017-2018
    The Wildlife Trust BCN Annual Report and Accounts 2017-2018 Some of this year’s highlights ___________________________________________________ 3 Chairman’s Introduction _______________________________________________________ 5 Strategic Report Our Five Year Plan: Better for Wildlife by 2020 _____________________________________ 6 Delivery: Wildlife Conservation __________________________________________________ 7 Delivery: Nene Valley Living Landscape _________________________________________________ 8 Delivery: Great Fen Living Landscape __________________________________________________ 10 Delivery: North Chilterns Chalk Living Landscape ________________________________________ 12 Delivery: Ouse Valley Living Landscape ________________________________________________ 13 Delivery: Living Landscapes we are maintaining & responsive on ____________________________ 14 Delivery: Beyond our living landscapes _________________________________________________ 16 Local Wildlife Sites _________________________________________________________________ 17 Planning __________________________________________________________________________ 17 Monitoring and Research ____________________________________________________________ 18 Local Environmental Records Centres __________________________________________________ 19 Land acquisition and disposal _______________________________________________________ 20 Land management for developers _____________________________________________________ 21 Reaching out - People Closer to Nature __________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • 88. Bedfordshire and Cambridgeshire Claylands Area Profile: Supporting Documents
    National Character 88. Bedfordshire and Cambridgeshire Claylands Area profile: Supporting documents www.naturalengland.org.uk 1 National Character 88. Bedfordshire and Cambridgeshire Claylands Area profile: Supporting documents Introduction National Character Areas map As part of Natural England’s responsibilities as set out in the Natural Environment White Paper,1 Biodiversity 20202 and the European Landscape Convention,3 we are revising profiles for England’s 159 National Character Areas North (NCAs). These are areas that share similar landscape characteristics, and which East follow natural lines in the landscape rather than administrative boundaries, making them a good decision-making framework for the natural environment. Yorkshire & The North Humber NCA profiles are guidance documents which can help communities to inform West their decision-making about the places that they live in and care for. The information they contain will support the planning of conservation initiatives at a East landscape scale, inform the delivery of Nature Improvement Areas and encourage Midlands broader partnership working through Local Nature Partnerships. The profiles will West also help to inform choices about how land is managed and can change. Midlands East of Each profile includes a description of the natural and cultural features England that shape our landscapes, how the landscape has changed over time, the current key drivers for ongoing change, and a broad analysis of each London area’s characteristics and ecosystem services. Statements of Environmental South East Opportunity (SEOs) are suggested, which draw on this integrated information. South West The SEOs offer guidance on the critical issues, which could help to achieve sustainable growth and a more secure environmental future.
    [Show full text]
  • Viburnum Lantana L. and Viburnum Opulus L. (V
    Viburnum lantana L. and Viburnum opulus L. (V. lobatum Lam., Opulus vulgaris Borkh.) Author(s): Johannes Kollmann and Peter J. Grubb Source: Journal of Ecology, Vol. 90, No. 6 (Dec., 2002), pp. 1044-1070 Published by: British Ecological Society Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3072311 Accessed: 23/03/2010 10:24 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=briteco. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. British Ecological Society is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of Ecology. http://www.jstor.org Journalof BIOLOGICAL FLORA OF THE BRITISH ISLES* No.
    [Show full text]
  • Brogborough Wind Energy Development
    March 2014 BROGBOROUGH WIND ENERGY DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT VOLUME TWO ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT MAIN TEXT FCC Environment Ltd [3512084A] [Final] Brogborough Wind Energy Development - Environmental Statement Volume 2 – Main Text Prepared for FCC Environment Ltd Ground Floor West 900 Pavillion Drive Northampton NN4 7RG Prepared by Parsons Brinckerhoff Amber Court William Armstrong Drive Newcastle upon Tyne NE4 7YQ 0191 226 2501 www.pbworld.com Brogborough Wind Energy Development - Environmental Statement CONTENTS Page Introduction 11 1 Introduction 13 1.1 Purpose of the Environmental Statement 13 1.2 The Developer 13 1.3 The Consultant 13 1.4 The Project 14 1.5 Scoping 15 1.6 The Environmental Statement 15 1.7 Copies of the ES 16 1.8 Consultations 16 1.9 Cumulative Impact Assessment 17 Need For And Benefits Of The Project 19 2 Needs For and Benefits Of The Project 21 2.1 Overview 21 2.2 Climate Change 21 2.3 Tackling Climate Change 22 2.4 European Climate Change Programme 22 2.5 UK Climate Change Programme 23 2.6 Renewables Obligation and Renewables Targets 23 2.7 Climate Change within Local Planning Policy 25 2.8 Renewable Energy in the UK 25 2.9 Wind Energy in the UK 26 2.10 Additional Benefits of the Proposed Development 26 2.11 Economic Benefits 26 2.12 Power Supply Benefits 27 2.13 Environmental Benefits 28 Planning Policy 31 3 Planning Policy 33 3.1 Introduction 33 3.2 The Plan-Led System 33 3.3 The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) 33 3.4 Meeting National Planning Guidance 38 3.5 Meeting the challenge of
    [Show full text]
  • Lowland Dry Acid Grassland
    Bedfordshire and Luton Habitat Action Plan: Lowland Dry Acid Grassland Updated September 2015 Foreword We are fortunate in Bedfordshire to have a fantastic range of habitats and species within a relatively small geographical area. It is a county of marked contrasts, with the chalk habitats of the North Chilterns, the heathland and acid grassland of the Greensand Ridge and the woodlands and rolling countryside of the Ouse Valley. The fact that species such as adders, dormice and otters are all now expanding their ranges to varying degrees is something we should be proud of and testament to the work of the organisations and individuals involved, but we should not be complacent. There is much to be done, and these Biodiversity Action Plans set out the scale of that challenge very clearly. Only by continuing to work in partnership, putting the case for nature ever more strongly and clearly, can we hope to build on recent progress, bring the natural environment to the fore of the thinking of key decision- makers and reverse long-term declines. Jon Balaam, Chair of Bedfordshire Local Nature Partnership Bedfordshire & Luton Biodiversity Action Plan 2 Lowland acid grassland Habitat Action Plan Biodiversity Action Plans Overview The UK Biodiversity Action Plan (BAP) was created in response to a commitment at the 1992 Convention on Biological Diversity. It summarises the status of the most threatened habitats and species in the UK and then sets out a series of actions to halt their decline and then reverse it. There are National Action Plans for 1150 species and 65 habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • Luton and Southern Bedfordshire Green Infrastructure Plan 2009
    Luton and southern Bedfordshire Green Infrastructure Plan 2009 Produced by the Greensand Trust on behalf of Luton and southern Bedfordshire Joint Technical Unit Luton and South Bedfordshire Green Infrastructure plan 2009 2 Contents Foreword ......................................................................................................................................... 6 Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................... 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................. 8 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 12 1.1 Need for this Plan ......................................................................................................... 12 1.2 Policy Background ........................................................................................................ 14 1.3 What is Green Infrastructure? ...................................................................................... 15 1.4 Aim & Objectives ..................................................................................................... 16 2. Context .................................................................................................................................. 17 2.1 Environmental Context ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]