Book of Abstracts
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Politics of Multilingualism in Roma Education in Early Soviet Union and Its Current Projections Marushiakova, Elena; Popov, Vesselin
www.ssoar.info Politics of multilingualism in Roma education in early Soviet Union and its current projections Marushiakova, Elena; Popov, Vesselin Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Marushiakova, E., & Popov, V. (2017). Politics of multilingualism in Roma education in early Soviet Union and its current projections. Social Inclusion, 5(4), 48-59. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v5i4.1128 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer CC BY Lizenz (Namensnennung) zur This document is made available under a CC BY Licence Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den CC-Lizenzen finden (Attribution). For more Information see: Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.de Social Inclusion (ISSN: 2183–2803) 2017, Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages 48–59 DOI: 10.17645/si.v5i4.1128 Article Politics of Multilingualism in Roma Education in Early Soviet Union and Its Current Projections Elena Marushiakova * and Vesselin Popov School of History, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, KY16 9BA, UK; E-Mails: [email protected] (E.M.), [email protected] (V.P.) * Corresponding author Submitted: 14 August 2017 | Accepted: 16 October 2017 | Published: 22 December 2017 Abstract This article presents the history of the politics of multilingualism (or lack thereof) in regard to Roma (formerly known as ‘Gypsies’). In the 1920s and 1930s in the newly established Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, against a backdrop of pro- claimed principles of full equality of all peoples1 living in the new state, commenced a rapid creation of schools for Roma children with instruction in Romani mother-tongue along with special training of Roma teachers. -
Dissertation Outline
COMMON AND DIFFERING IMPACTS OF THE EUROPEAN FRAMEWORK FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES WITH SPECIAL CONSIDERATION OF SWEDEN AND POLAND A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY Katarzyna M. Polanska IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Advisers: Professor Ann Hironaka and Professor Joachim J. Savelsberg December 2012 Acknowledgements First and foremost, I want to thank my advisors, Ann Hironaka and Joachim Savelsberg. Ann’s excellent guidance, caring, patience, and encouragement truly kept me going. She was always available to discuss my ideas, and provide feedback and suggestions on how to strengthen my arguments. Joachim’s feedback was invaluable and conversations with him led to many of the ideas put forth; his comments and critiques enriched the work. Countless conversations with these two intelligent mentors helped focus and improve my work. I cannot thank them enough. I also benefitted from my superb dissertation committee. Its members provided important input and critique at various stages of research and writing. Ron Aminzade reminded me of the importance of considering a variety of forces in the study of social phenomena and his comments improved my arguments. Joseph Gerteis provided excellent suggestions on how to clarify of my arguments, suggested methods, and challenged me to strengthen the project in a variety of ways. I also thank Helga Leitner for her thoughtful critique and support over the years. During my time at the University of Minnesota, I took a number of excellent and intellectually stimulating classes and met a number of other faculty who left an impression and inspired me in a variety of ways including Jeffrey Broadbent, Liz Boyle, Robin Stryker, and Evan Schofer. -
Promoting the Social Inclusion of Roma
EU NETWORK OF INDEPENDENT EXPERTS ON SOCIAL INCLUSION PROMOTING THE SOCIAL INCLUSION OF ROMA HUGH FRAZER AND ERIC MARLIER (NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND MAYNOOTH, CEPS/INSTEAD) DECEMBER 2011 SYNTHESIS REPORT On behalf of the Disclaimer: This report reflects the views of its authors European Commission and these are not necessarily those of either the DG Employment, Social Affairs European Commission or the Member States. and Inclusion The original language of the report is English. EU NETWORK OF INDEPENDENT EXPERTS ON SOCIAL INCLUSION PROMOTING THE SOCIAL INCLUSION OF ROMA HUGH FRAZER AND ERIC MARLIER (NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND MAYNOOTH, CEPS/INSTEAD) DECEMBER 2011 SYNTHESIS REPORT Overview based on the national reports prepared by the EU Network of Independent Experts on Social Inclusion Disclaimer: This report reflects the views of its authors and these are not necessarily those of either the European Commission or the Member States. The original language of the report is English. On behalf of the European Commission DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion SYNTHESIS REPORT Contents Preface 3 Summary, conclusions and suggestions 4 A. Summary 4 A.1 Overview of the situation of the Roma in the European Union (EU) 4 A.2 Assessment of existing policy and governance frameworks and identification of key policy priorities to be addressed in national Roma integration strategies 6 B. Conclusions and suggestions 12 1. Overview of the Situation of the Roma in the EU 16 1.1 Roma population across the EU 16 1.2 Geographical variations within countries 20 1.3 Poverty and social exclusion of Roma 22 1.3.1 Income poverty and deprivation 23 1.3.2 Educational disadvantage 24 1.3.3 Employment disadvantage 27 1.3.4 Poor health 30 1.3.5 Inadequate housing and environment 32 1.3.6 Limited access to sport, recreation and culture 34 1.4 Widespread discrimination and racism 35 1.5 Gender discrimination 38 1.6 Extensive data gaps 39 2. -
About Limassol
ABOUT LIMASSOL The district of Limassol which covers the south part of Cyprus, borders with the district of Larnaca in the east, with the district of Paphos in the west, as well as with the capital Nicosia in the north. The area of Limassol is 1,393 km² i.e. 15% of the whole area of Cyprus. About 80 km of Limassol is washed by the sea. Combining its roles as the second largest city, the island's main port, the centre of the wine industry and a bustling holiday resort, Lemesos emerges as a spirited and cosmopolitan seaside town. Limassol is a lively town largely due to the character of Lemesolians, a fun- loving lot. No wonder it holds the island's two top festivals, the pre-lenten Carnival with fancy dress balls, parades and festivities and the Wine Festival in September, a wine extravaganza where wine flows freely for everyone to enjoy, courtesy of the local wineries. Limassol emerged out of the two most important ancient city-kingdoms, Amathous, to the east of the town, and Kourion to the west, both of which are being extensively excavated. The magnificent setting of the ancient Kourion Theater is used for summer concerts and theatrical productions. In the middle Ages, Limassol hosted the marriage of Richard the Lionheart with Berengaria of Navarre from whom he crowned Queen of England. Thereafter the Crusaders made their headquarters at the Square keep west of the city, known as Kolossi Medieval Castle, where they fostered the making of wines, particularly the sweet dessert wine “Commandaria” – the oldest named wine in the world. -
Report on Romani Language
ROMANINET- A MULTIMEDIA ROMANI COURSE FOR PROMOTING LINGUISTIC DIVERSITY AND IMPROVING SOCIAL DIALOGUE: REPORT ON ROMANI LANGUAGE 1 Instituto de Enseñanza Secundaria Ribeira do Louro (Spain), Asesoramiento, Tecnología e Investigación S.L. (Spain), Fundación Secretariado Gitano (Spain), "ETHNOTOLERANCE" (Bulgary), Secretariado Diocesano de Lisboa da Obra Pastoral dos Ciganos (Portugal), Grup Scolar Industrial Victor Jinga (Romania), SC CONCEPT CONSULTING SRL (România), University of Manchester (United Kingdom) CONTENT REPORT ON ROMANI LANGUAGE .................................................................2 1. Spoken Dialects ...................................................................................2 2. Geographical spread .............................................................................8 3. Users - by group and number ................................................................. 11 4. The place of the language in the European curriculum .................................. 13 5. Educational materials and other information sources available in Romani language18 2 Instituto de Enseñanza Secundaria Ribeira do Louro (Spain), Asesoramiento, Tecnología e Investigación S.L. (Spain), Fundación Secretariado Gitano (Spain), "ETHNOTOLERANCE" (Bulgary), Secretariado Diocesano de Lisboa da Obra Pastoral dos Ciganos (Portugal), Grup Scolar Industrial Victor Jinga (Romania), SC CONCEPT CONSULTING SRL (România), University of Manchester (United Kingdom) REPORT ON ROMANI LANGUAGE 1. Spoken Dialects A. Origins and attestation Romani -
Authentic Route 4
Cyprus Authentic Route 4 Safety Driving in Cyprus Comfort Rural Accommodation Only DIGITAL Tips Useful Information Version Celebrating the Vine Lemesos • Pano Polemidia • Apesia • Korfi • Limnatis • Kapileio • Agios Mamas • Pelendri • Potamitissa • Dymes • Agros • Chandria • Kyperounta • Troodos Square • Lemithou • Prodromos • Palaiomylos • Trooditissa Monastery • Foini • Kato and Pano Platres • Mandria • Omodos • Pera Pedi • Kouka • Silikou • Lofou • Lemesos Route 4 Lemesos – Pano Polemidia – Apesia – Korfi – Limnatis – Kapileio – Agios Mamas – Pelendri – Potamitissa – Dymes – Agros – Chandria – Kyperounta – Troodos Square – Lemithou – Prodromos – Palaiomylos – Trooditissa Monastery – Foini – Kato and Pano Platres – Mandria – Omodos – Pera Pedi – Kouka – Silikou – Lofou – Lemesos Moutoullas Panagia Panagia Archangelos Kannavia Agia Eirini tou Araka Mylikouri Pedoulas Spilia Saranti Lagoudera TROODOS Lemithou Livadia Platanistasa Prodromos Chandria Alithinou Fterikoudi Polystypos Kaminaria Palaiomylos Kyperounta Alona Askas Kato Apliki Treis Agios Agridia Amiantos Palaichori Elies Dimitrios TROODOS Dymes Agros Farmakas Ε4 Metamorfosis Trooditissa SQUARE Potamitissa Agios tou Sotiros Kampi Mesa Ioannis Agios Foini Pano Potamos Pelendri Panagia Theodoros Katholiki Platres Kato Odou Kato Mylos Platres Timios PITSILIA Moniatis Stavros Agios Agios Sykopetra Agios Mandria Pavlos Konstantinos Nikolaos Timios Pera Agios Stavros Pedi Kouka Mamas Zoopigi Kalo Agia Mavri Trimiklini Omodos Chorio Arakapas Arsos Koilani Silikou KOUMANDARIAKapileio -
Roma and Sinti Under-Studied Victims of Nazism
UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM CENTER FOR ADVANCED HOLOCAUST STUDIES Roma and Sinti Under-Studied Victims of Nazism Symposium Proceedings W A S H I N G T O N , D. C. Roma and Sinti Under-Studied Victims of Nazism Symposium Proceedings CENTER FOR ADVANCED HOLOCAUST STUDIES UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM 2002 The assertions, opinions, and conclusions in this occasional paper are those of the authors. They do not necessarily reflect those of the United States Holocaust Memorial Council or of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. Third printing, July 2004 Copyright © 2002 by Ian Hancock, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2002 by Michael Zimmermann, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2002 by Guenter Lewy, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2002 by Mark Biondich, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2002 by Denis Peschanski, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2002 by Viorel Achim, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2002 by David M. Crowe, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum Contents Foreword .....................................................................................................................................i Paul A. Shapiro and Robert M. Ehrenreich Romani Americans (“Gypsies”).......................................................................................................1 Ian -
South-East Europe International Relations Quarterly
INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS QUARTERLY, Vol. 5. No.1. (Spring 2014/1) ROMA COMMUNITIES IN SOUTHEAST EUROPE JÓZSEF-GYÖRGY FEKETE (Abstract) The aim of this paper is to present the Roma1 people and their status in Southeast Europe; since they are the largest and most heterogeneous ethnic minority of the region. We are focusing on the Post-Yugoslav countries, Albania, Romania and Bulgaria. Hungary is not integrated organically to the studied countries, however for the easier comparison; we took the data of the Hungarian Gypsies into the analysis. The Roma people are not a homogeneous community, the religion, the language and the historical background both could differentiate them. Some ethnic groups who are attached the Gypsies also wish to distinguish themselves from the Romanies. The phenomenon of "preferred identity" can be observed within the Roma communities, which means that they do not identify themselves as Roma to avoid discrimination; and because of the assimilation (linguistic, religious and cultural) and "social progress" (especially in the more educated social layer). The socio-economic inequalities are increasing among both the Roms and the rest of the population; and within the Roma population as well. There are people in each country who live under or fall below the poverty line; however this process is much more intense and more drastic amongst the Roma population. This paper also aims to shed the light on the current situation of the Romani people living in the Balkans. For the sake of the objective we found important to present the history of the Roma in each country. We carried out a comprehensive analysis of the Hungarian and foreign literature, therefore, to the maximum extent possible, we tried to get to know previous studies of those researchers as widely as possible the, who live in the countries concerned. -
Asomatos Kolossi Limassol Akhelia Ktima Ayios Epikl Kazaphani Limassol District
9 Limassol District: Asomatos Trakhoni Kolossi Zakaki Limassol Paphos District: Akhelia Mandria Ktima Yeroskipos Kyrenia District: Ayios Epikljito s Kyrenia Kazaphani Lapithos Kato Dhikomo PART II. Prescribed Crops. The following members of the Brassicae family commonly known as Cauliflower, Cabbage, Brussels sprouts, Broccoli, Sprouting Broccoli, Kale, Kohlrabi. Given at Nicosia, this 9th day of January, 1948. (M.P. 829/42/3.) No. 12. THE SUPPLIES AND SERVICES (TRANSITIONAL POWERS) (CYPRUS) ORDER, 1946. ORDER MADE BY A COMPETENT AUTHORITY UNDER DEFENCE REGULATION 61. In exercise of the powers vested in me by virtue of my appointment by the Governor as Competent Authority for the purposes of Regulation 61 as set out in the First Schedule to the Supplies and Services (Transitional Powers) (Cyprus) Order, JJM6,, J do hereby order that the Qazette. Defence (Control of Timber) Order, 1942Λβ revoked without prejudice Suppl. No. 3: to anything done or left undone thereunder. ^.c^^ , 6.8.1942 u P.P.TAYLOR, I * §jfi£ /χ/Γ./Γ</ι Controller of Supplies, Transport and Marketing, ' " Competent Authority. No. 13. THE OATHS LAW, 1938. SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION UNDER SECTION 6. By virtue of the powers vested in the Governor by Section 6 of the * Oaths Law, 1938, and delegated to me under Notification No. 172 published in Supplement No. 3 to the Gazette of the 19th June, 1947, I hereby authorize Mr. Michael Savva Krashias, Mukhtar of Kokkini Trimithia, to administer oaths for the purposes of the said Law, in lieu of Christodoulos Charalambous Shiaboura, whose authorization is hereby revoked. Dated the 10th January, 1948. A. C. -
Roma Labelling: Policy and Academia Elena Marushiakova, Vesselin Popov
4 66 • 2018 ARTICLES ROMA LABELLING: POLICY AND ACADEMIA ELENA MARUSHIAKOVA, VESSELIN POPOV https://doi.org/10.26363/SN.2018.4.02 ©Institute of Ethnology and Social Anthropology of SAS Professor Elena Marushiakova, PhD, School of History, University of St Andrews, St Katharine’s Lodge, The Scores 14, St Andrews, Fife KY16 9BA, Scotland, UK; e-mail: [email protected] Professor Vesselin Popov, PhD, School of History, University of St Andrews, St Katharine’s Lodge, The Scores 14, St Andrews, Fife KY16 9BA, Scotland, UK; e-mail: vp43@ st-andrews.ac.uk For centuries in different countries of Central, South-eastern and Eastern Europe groups of people have lived who are all called by their surrounding population with different appellations, which is usually translated into English as “Gypsies”. In the last quarter of a century, instead of these names, a new common designation has been established in the region’s public discourse, based on their self-appellation “Roma”. The processes of labelling and imposition of the new name on these communities did not stop in this region, and the label “Roma” is increasingly spreading in the remaining parts of Europe and even beyond. This process of imposing “from above” of a “politically correct” labelling, however, has led to, for some perhaps unexpectedly, to others predictably, an impact on the field. Some local communities labelled today “Roma” started to demonstrate publicly their reluctance to comply with the designation imposed on them from the “outside”. The proposed article will reveal the historical sources of labelling of these communities and main dimensions of these contradictory processes. -
CERD 78 Serbia
SERBIA BRIEFING TO THE UN COMMITTEE ON THE ELIMINATION OF RACIAL DISCRIMINATION 78 th session February 2011 Amnesty International Publications First published in 2010 by Amnesty International Publications International Secretariat Peter Benenson House 1 Easton Street London WC1X 0DW United Kingdom www.amnesty.org © Amnesty International Publications 2010 Index: EUR 70/016/2010 Original Language: English Printed by Amnesty International, International Secretariat, United Kingdom All rights reserved. This publication is copyright, but may be reproduced by any method without fee for advocacy, campaigning and teaching purposes, but not for resale. The copyright holders request that all such use be registered with them for impact assessment purposes. For copying in any other circumstances, or for reuse in other publications, or for translation or adaptation, prior written permission must be obtained from the publishers, and a fee may be payable. To request permission, or for any other inquiries, please contact [email protected] Amnesty International is a global movement of 2.8 million supporters, members and activists in more than 150 countries and territories who campaign to end grave abuses of human rights. Our vision is for every person to enjoy all the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international human rights standards. We are independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion and are funded mainly by our membership and public donations. CONTENTS 1. Introduction........................................................................................................4 -
International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination
United Nations CERD/C/RUS/23-24 International Convention on Distr.: General 1 July 2016 the Elimination of All Forms English of Racial Discrimination Original: Russia English, French, Russian and Spanish only Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination Consideration of reports submitted by States parties under article 9 of the Convention Twenty-third to twenty-fourth periodic reports of States parties due in 2016 Russian Federation* [Date received: 27 May 2016] * The present document is being issued without formal editing. GE.16-11322 (EXT) CERD/C/RUS/23-24 Contents Page I. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 3 II. Information on measures to implement the articles of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination ......................................................................... 6 Article 1 ............................................................................................................................................ 6 Article 2 ............................................................................................................................................ 7 Article 4 ............................................................................................................................................ 12 Article 5 ...........................................................................................................................................