DOCUMENT RESUME SE 019 072 the Lake Michigan Federation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

DOCUMENT RESUME SE 019 072 the Lake Michigan Federation DOCUMENT RESUME ED 108 892 SE 019 072 AUTHOR Culhane, Paul J. TITLE The Lake Michigan Federation: Evaluation of an Environmental Interest Group. LNSTITUTION Northwestern Univ., Evanst6n, Ill. Center for Urban Affairs. PUB DATE 7 74 NOTE I67p.; Occasional marginal legibility EDRS PRICE MF-$0.76 HC-$8.2.4 PLUS POSTAGE DESCRIPTORS *Environment; Environmental Education; Natural Resources; *Organizational Effectiveness; *Organizations (Groups); *Program Descriptions; *Program Evaluation; Water Resources IDENTIFIERS *Lake Michigan Federation ABSTRACT Since Earth Day 1970, the number of environmental groups has approXimately doubled and the movement articulates a much broader and comprehensive philosophy than earlier conservation or preservation movements. The Lake Michigan Federation, one of the new environmental groups developed from the Open Lands Project, was publicly proclaimed in September 1970. The official goal of the federation is to "save the lake." This study is an evaluation of the Lake Michigan; Federation and was undertaken: (1) to provide the federation with means of examining its performance, (2) to monitor the use of grant monies, and(3) to provide useful information for other environmental groups. The study contains six chapters: History and Organization of the Lake Michigan, ederation, Lake Michigan Federation Operation, Political Effectiveness, Public Information and Membership Evaluation, Lake Michigan Federation Leadership, and Conclusion. The conclusions of the study include: (1) the group functions effectively as a political interest group,(2) federation leadership is very centralized and dependent on the work of the organization's Executive Secretary, and (3) the federation can be used as a model for other groups. Appendices are also included. (TK) ****************f****************************************************** Documents acquired by ERIC include many informal unpublished * materials not available from other sources. ERIC makes every effort * * to obtain the best copy available. nevertheless, items of marginal * * reproducibility are often encountered and this affects the quality * * of the microfiche and hardcopy reproductions ERIC makes available * * via the ERIC Document Reproduction Service (EDRS). EDRS is not * responsible for the quality of the original document. Reproductions * * supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original. ***********************4!*********************************************** U S DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. EDUCATION A WELFARE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRO DUCED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED FROM THE PERSON OR OROAN42ATION ORIGIN AIING IT POINTS OF VIEW OR OPINIONS STATED DO NUT NECESSARILY REPRE SENT OFFICIAL NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION POSITION OR POLICY PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE THIS COPY- RIGHTED MATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY BarjrSpares__ Nort e-_hwgar, jaulmis.._ TO ERIC AND ORGANIZATIONS OPERATING UNDER AGREEMENTS WITH THE NATIONAL. IN STITUTE OF EDUCATION FURTHER REPRO RUCTION OUTSIDE THE ERIC SYSTEM RE QUIRES PERMISSION OF THE COPYRIGHT OWNER' -.- A .1. le (-NJ CT CO CO C) LU THE LAKE MICHIGAN FEDERATION: EVALUATION OF AN .ENVIRONMENTAL INTEREST GROUP Paul J.Culhane* Public Lands Project Center for UrbanAfiairs Northwestern University 2040 Sheridan Road Evanston, Illinois 60201 November 1974 *&search Associate, Public Lands Project, andPh.D. Candidate, Department of Political Science, NorthwesternUniversity. Copyright ao 1974 NorthwesternUniversity PREFACE "Whatever legacy we L(Ave, Hell, it isn't going to be getting a Cesspool for Winnetka!" Richard Nixon to John Ehrlichman, April 14, 1973 Fortunately for Winnetka and other American communities, the sentiments reflected in the above quote are not universally held. The issues of "cess- pools for Winnetka" and other efforts to protect the environment are contested daily by government agencies, legislatures, and courts, at the local, state, and federal levels, by industries and other users of the environment, and by that collection of organizations, large and small, cosmopolitan and parochial, which has come to be called the "environmental movement." Since Earth Day 1970, a significant event has taken place in American interest-group politics -- the growth of the environmental movement. Since 1970 the number of "environmental" groups has approximately doubled (CEQ,1973), and, as Morrison et al. (1972) and others have pointed out, the movement articulates a much broader and comprehensive philosophy than either of the older conservation or preservation movements. New environmental groups, as well as established organizations like the Sierra Club, have attracted considerable resources: the time and effort of citizen activists, memberships dues, other membership contributions, and significant funding, especially by foundations, One such new environmental group is the Lake Michigan Federation(LMF).l The study was stimulated by one of the federation's major funding sources. iv. A portion of a three-year, $100,000 operating grant from the Ford Foundation to the LMF was designated for an evaluation study to be conducted by "an objective outside agency."2The Public Lands Project3 was contracted by the federation to perform this study in September 1973, and the, study has been conduCted during the past academic year. Our evaluation of the federation has three explicit objectives. First, the study is intended to provide the federation with a means of examining its performance and organization. Providing insights on which to base changes or improvements is implicit in such a goal. Second, the study could be viewed as an informal method by which the Ford Foundation can monitor its grant to the federation (although this goal was never explicitly stated by the foundation). It should be noted, however, that (a) the last year of the grant was not con- tingent on the outcome of this study, and (b) the grant was understood to be 4 one-shot, "seed money" arrangement only. Third, it is hoped that this study will prove useful for other environmental organizations, that an understanding of the experience and performance of one environmental group will be relevant knowledge for similar groups uao are seeking to examine their own performance. This third objective of the evaluation study reflects the rationale of the case-study method in academic social science: the study of one entity among many may provide insights into the common properties of all of a class of entities. In fact, this has been a personal objective of the author in con- ducting this study. While there is a well-developed tradition in the study of politics which argues, that interest groups play a significant role in the development of public policy, there have been relatively few detailed case studies of individual interest groups, particularly environmental interest groups.4 Hopefully, this study can contribute to filling this gap in interest- group literature. While an evaluation such as this should meet the objectives described above, it also presents certain unique problems. The primary or first goal of the study -- to provide the federation with a systematicevaluation of its performance -- does not fit neatly into either of the traditions of evaluation research. One tradition, policy evaluation research, is generally concerned_ with the outcomes or effects of governmental actions. That is, one evaluates whether a governmental decision did or did not have the intended effect and/or whether the decision produced some unintended result. Such an approach (rightly or wrongly) assumes that a governmental action has a direct and straightforward effect on some physical, social, political, or economic environ- ment; that is, the referent system includes only a governmental entity and some relevant environment which is being acted upon. However, an interest group like the Lake Michigan Federation does not operate in such a simple system. The LMF's actions (1) are at least one step removed from the actual decision, and (2) compete with the actions of others (e.g., industrial dischargers) and are reinforced by the actions of others (e.g., other environmental groups with the same point of view on given issues). The second tradition in public policy analysis focuses on the decision- making process in government. However, a process in which one entity (a government agency or legislative body) both receives pressures and makes a decision is much more amenable to both quantitative and qualitative analysis than a process in whcih one entity (an interest group) seeks to influence many decisions made by many governmental bodies. (Another plausible evaluation would be to examine the management efficiency of the federation's activities. This has not been a focus of the study, and the author's interests and competences would not enable him to perform such an evaluation. In addition, such an evaluation would not be particularly productive for an organization as small as the federation, with six full-time employees, etc.) V. A view of the federation as a discrete entity whose sole role is to influence public policy significantly underestimates the federation's ac- tivities. A major focus of the federation has been to "promote citizen participation in the public policy decisions needed to protect" Lake . Michigan.5This statement is not a myth generated by the federation to increase the legitimacy of the organization in the eyes of decision makers or to protect its "non-political" tax status. This function is widely perceived by officers, staff, and members
Recommended publications
  • Extensions of Remarks E171 EXTENSIONS of REMARKS
    February 13, 2008 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — Extensions of Remarks E171 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS HONORING THE LIFE OF ARMOND 21, 2008 Mr. Farias will be celebrated for his discipline, and respect to authority in a demo- J. MAGNARELLI contributions to Burlington County at the Bur- cratic society. lington County Republican Committee and This achievement is a true honor to all the HON. JAMES T. WALSH Burlington County Republican Women’s An- young men and women involved in the Cocke OF NEW YORK nual Lincoln Day Dinner. County NJROTC program. The rankings, each IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Perhaps one of the most gregarious and en- respectively, show the dedication and commit- Wednesday, February 13, 2008 thusiastic Edgewater Park residents, Vince ment to service and our Nation. Farias was always a proponent of action lead- It is exciting for me to see the young men Mr. WALSH of New York. Madam Speaker, ing to results. A veteran schoolteacher, bank- and women of Cocke County NJROTC estab- I rise today to honor the life of a consummate er, and small business owner, Vincent served lishing such high standards at a young age gentleman and a terrific ambassador for the 6 years on the Edgewater Park Township and it bestows great promise for the State of central New York community, the Honorable Committee and as mayor in 1987 and 1991. Tennessee and our Nation alike. Armond J. Magnarelli, who passed away last After first filling a vacant freeholder seat in Madam Speaker, I ask that the House join weekend. 1991, Vince went on to serve 5 terms as a me this evening in honoring the Cocke County A teacher by trade at Lyncourt School, member of the Burlington County Board of NJROTC program for their commitment to ex- Armond entered elected office as a member of Chosen Freeholders.
    [Show full text]
  • 1998-Fall.Pdf
    Fall 98 Cover F&B_ Fall 98 Cover F&B 12/24/15 9:45 AM Page 3 Chicago EXPLORING NATURE & CULTURE WFALILL 19D98 ERNES S FIRE AS A FRIEND • T HINKING LIKE A SEED Fall cov 02 - 12_ Fall cov 02 - 12 12/24/15 10:10 AM Page cov2 is Chicago Wilderness? Chicago Wilderness is some of the finest and most signifi - cant nature in the temperate world, with roughly 200,000 acres of protected natural lands harboring native plant and animal communities that are more rare—and their survival more globally threatened—than the tropical rain forests. CHICAGO WILDERNESS is an unprecedented alliance of more than 60 public and private organizations working together to study and restore, protect and manage the precious natural resources of the Chicago region for the benefit of the public. Chicago WILDERNES S is a new quarterly magazine that seeks to articulate a vision of regional identity linked to nature and our natural heritage, to celebrate and promote the rich nat - ural areas of this region, and to inform readers about the work of the many organizations engaged in collaborative conservation. Fall cov 02 - 12_ Fall cov 02 - 12 12/24/15 10:10 AM Page 1 CHICAGO WILDERNESS A Regional Nature Reserve Keeping the Home Fires Burning or generations of us inculcated with the gospel according them, both by white men and by Indians—par accident; and Fto Smokey, setting fire to woods and prairies on purpose yet many more where it is voluntarily done for the purpose amounts to blasphemy. Yet those who love the land have of getting a fresh crop of grass, for the grazing of their horses, been wrestling with some new ideas about fire—new ideas and also for easier travelling during the next summer.” that are very old.
    [Show full text]
  • Law and Governance of the Great Lakes
    LAW AND GOVERNANCE OF THE GREAT LAKES Noah D. Hall and Benjamin C. Houston* INTRODUCTION The Great Lakes are vast. The five lakes that make up the sys- tem—Superior, Michigan, Huron, Erie, and Ontario—comprise the largest freshwater system on Earth and contain approximately one- fifth of the world’s water supply.1 The Great Lakes provide water for consumption, highways for trade and transportation, fuel for power, and natural beauty for recreation.2 Approximately 35 million people live within the Great Lakes Basin, and 23 million depend on the Lakes for their drinking water.3 The Lakes are more than 750 miles wide and have a surface area greater than 300,000 square miles; there are 25,000 square miles of connected smaller lakes, hundreds of miles of navigable rivers, and 10,000 miles of shoreline.4 Simply put, the Great Lakes are enormous in their physical size and quantity of water. The enormity of the Great Lakes is matched by a governance and legal regime that can overwhelm attorneys and policymakers. The system is shared and governed by two countries, eight states,5 two provinces, and numerous Indian tribes and First Nations, in addition to a multitude of American, Canadian, and international agencies, as well as thousands of local governments.6 This “patchwork” of Great * Noah D. Hall, Associate Professor, Wayne State University Law School; J.D., University of Michigan Law School, 1998; B.S., University of Michigan School of Natural Resources & Envi- ronment, 1995. Benjamin C. Houston, LL.M., Lewis & Clark Law School; J.D., University of Michigan Law School; B.A., Kalamazoo College.
    [Show full text]
  • Mr. Charles Orzehoskie
    Statement of Charles Orzehoskie, Esq., P.E. President, National Council of EPA Locals# 238 American Federation of Government Employees Before the Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight Committee on Science and Technology U.S. House of Representatives March 13, 2008 Good morning, Chairman Miller, Congressman Sensenbrenner and members of the Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight. I thank you for this opportunity to appear before you today to present AFGE Council 238’s views about the closure of EPA’s libraries. INTRODUCTION My name is Charles Orzehoskie. I am President of the National Council of EPA Locals# 238 of the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE). I have worked for EPA for over 37 years as a professional engineer in the construction grants program, facilities planning, and 208 plans under the Clean Water Act, and served as Chief of EPA Region 5’s Wetlands Enforcement Program. Over 20 years of my EPA service has been as a supervisor, including two years on an Interagency Personnel Agreement to the Indiana Department of Environment Management as Chief of their Facilities Development Branch. I am a Licensed Attorney in the State of Illinois, and have been a Registered Professional Engineer in the States of Indiana and Illinois. - 1 - Additionally, I served two terms as the Vice President of the Illinois Society of Professional Engineers, and have been a member of both the American Bar Association and the Chicago Bar Association. AFGE COUNCIL 238 AFGE Council 238 represents almost 9,000 employees of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) who are first and foremost, committed to the protection of human health and the environment, and ensuring that our nation’s environmental acts, laws and regulations are carried out.
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Lakes: an Environmental Atlas and Resource Book
    I Ul Ii ureaEureat iaKesLKS AUasJiLIaS - 3rdira raMunZZCIlLiUfl ramc I U1 U Environment Environnement 141 Ca nada Canada Canad'a INMIMIMV19 -12:XMIFMTTM .. 9 Canad'a 'WEPA Ar-Enwonmemil Pfuac&on Home ChapLer 1 Chapter 2 Chapter 3 Chapter 4 THE GREAT LAKES Chapter 5 Chapter 6 An EnvironmentalAtlas and Resource Book Fact Sheet I Fact Sheet 2 Fact Sheet 3 T List Of Maos List Of Diagrams - Appendix Jp by Xummary Information for The QreaRLLaSLA Jointly produced by:. ~- Environmental Atlas and Resource Bpo~k Government of Canada - - Toronto,'Ontario: and United States Environmental Protection Agency Great Lakes National Program Office Chicago, Illinois Third Edition' 1995 Please N e-' The maps and photographs used in this on-line version of The GreatLakes Atlas'are, due'to file size limits, of lower quality than the original images. Should you desire better quality images, you may obtain a printed copy of the Atlas. The Atlas is distributed in both' Canada and the United States. httn /Aiwuuw nn Pr. crc..cq/crreat-lakes-atlas/intro.htniI . 2/6/022//0 - - - - - ---- -.- a cAr,%. .4. UL U Contents aI * 1. Physical Characteristics of the System 2. Settlement 3. Exploitation 4. Industrialization 5. The Evolution of Great Lakes Management 6. Toxic Contaminants 7. Understanding the Great Lakes from an Ecosystem Perspective Chapter Two - Natural Processes in the Great Lakes 1. Geology 2. Climate 3. Climate Chanae and the Great Lakes 4. The Hydrologic Cycle 5. Surface Runoff 6. Wetlands 7. Groundwater 8. Lake Levels 9. Lake Processes: Stratification and Turnover 10. Living Resources Chapter Three - People and the Great Lakes 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Lake Erie Is a Result of a Grant Received from the George Gund Foundation, Cleveland Ohio, by Drs
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 361 227 SE 053 776 AUTHOR Fortner, Rosanne W., Ed.; Mayer, Victor J., Ed. TITLE The Great Like Erie: A Reference Text for Educators and Communicators. INSTITUTION Ohio State Univ., Columbus. Ohio Sea Grant Program. SPONS AGENCY George Gund Foundation, Cleveland, Ohlo. PUB DATE 93 NOTE 161p. AVAILABLE FROMOhio Sea Grant Publications, The Ohio State University, 1314 Kinnear Road, Columbus, OH 43212-1194 ($8 plus $2 postage and handling). PUB TYPE Books (010) Collected Works General (020) Guides Non-Classroom Use (055) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC07 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Business; Climate; *Ecology; *Environmental Education; *Geography; *Geology; Plants (Botany); Poisons; Resource Materials; *United States History; Water Pollution; Water Quality; *Water Resources; Weather IDENTIFIERS Coastal Management; Fishing Industry; Government Regulation; Great Lakes; *Lake Erie; Shipping Industry ABSTRACT This volume of 16 chapters by 15 contributing authors was conceived as a means of drawing together a body of basic information about the Great Lakes that is up to date, based on sound research, and interpreted by experts in the scientific, historical, environmental and political value of the Great Lakes to North America and the world. Chapters include:(1) "These are the Sweetwater Seas" (Lee Botts);(2) "The Geological Setting of the Great Lakes" (Jane L. Forsyth);(3) "Vegetation and Plant Geography of the Lake Erie Basin" (John J. Furlong);(4) "The Effect of Lake Erie on Climate" (Val L. Eichenlaub);(5) "Coastal Processes on the Great Lakes" (Charles H. Carter);(6) "Early Struggles for Peace on Lake Erie" (Gerard T. Altoff);(7) "Opening the Region to Prosperity" (Gerard T. Altoff); (8) "The History of Great Lakes Shipping" (Alexander C.
    [Show full text]
  • US Environmental Protection Agency 1995 Great Lakes Atlas
    Great Lakes: The Lake Guardian Page 1 of 4 Great Lakes You are here: EPA Home Great Lakes The Great Lakes Atlas Chapter One - Introduction: The Great Lakes The Great Lakes: An Environmental Atlas and 1. Physical Characteristics of the System Resource Book 2. Settlement 3. Exploitation 4. Industrialization 5. The Evolution of Great Lakes Management 6. Toxic Contaminants 7. Understanding the Great Lakes from an Ecosystem Perspective Chapter Two - Natural Processes in the Great Lakes 1. Geology 2. Climate 3. Climate Change and the Great Lakes Jointly produced by: 4. The Hydrologic Cycle 5. Surface Runoff Government of Canada 6. Wetlands Toronto, Ontario 7. Groundwater and 8. Lake Levels United States 9. Lake Processes: Stratification and Turnover Environmental Protection 10. Living Resources Agency Great Lakes National Program Office Chapter Three - People and the Great Lakes Chicago, Illinois Third Edition 1995 1. Native People 2. Early Settlement by Europeans Please Note: The maps and 3. Development of the Lakes photographs used in this on- 4. Agriculture line version of The Great Lakes 5. Logging and Forestry Atlas are, due to file size 6. Canals, Shipping and Transportation limits, of lower quality than 7. Commercial Fisheries the original images. Should 8. Sport Fishery you desire better quality 9. Recreation images, you may obtain a 10. Urbanization and Industrial Growth printed copy of the Atlas. The 11. Levels, Diversions and Consumptive Use Studies Atlas is distributed in both Canada and the United States. Chapter Four - The Great Lakes Today - Concerns DISCLAIMER: Information 1. Pathogens herein is provided by the U.S. 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Connect Explore Investigate Synthesize
    CONNECT EXPLORE INVESTIGATE SYNTHESIZE Great Lakes in My World 9-12 Alliance for the Great Lakes, Chicago 60602 © 2012 by the Alliance for the Great Lakes All rights reserved. Published 2012 Printed in the United States of America 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 ISBN: 0-9770212-2-X The Alliance for the Great Lakes gratefully acknowledges support for this project from: Anne and Stephen Bent Rockwell Automation Connie and Dennis Keller Dr. Scholl Foundation The Siragusa Foundation Gravity Tank A Great Lakes educator’s guide with 66 Great Lakes Creature Cards and an accompanying USB flash drive with supplemental materials This book is printed on totally chlorine free, recycled paper using soy inks. Great Lakes in My World was funded in part by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) through grant number NE 96545101 with Alliance for the Great Lakes. The contents of this document do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. ©2012 by the Alliance for the Great Lakes. All rights reserved. This publication may be reproduced and distributed to students in whole or in part without permission, as long as such reproduction is for non-commercial or non-profit educational purposes, and the Alliance for the Great Lakes is credited with any use. For wider distribution, please contact the Alliance for the Great Lakes for special permission at [email protected] Formed in 1970, the Alliance for the Great Lakes (formerly the Lake Michigan Federation) is the oldest independent citizens’ organization in North America.
    [Show full text]
  • IMPACT “THREATS to the GREAT LAKES’ Earthshare Michigan Paul and Diane Culhane Julian Herzing-Burkard the Good Fortune to Live Here
    ALLIANCE DONORS DONOR PROFILE DONOR PROFILE EVERY DOLLAR MATTERS Thank you to the many generous donors who supported us in our 2015 fiscal INSIDE year (Sept. 1, 2014 - Aug. 31, 2015). Listed below are our donors $1,000 and above. *Thank you to our 2015 Taste of the Great Lakes Sponsors TOXIC ALGAE BYE-BYE BEADS FROM SHORE TO SHORE Region looks to land to clean Victory: Great Lakes to be free Volunteers on front lines of Great FOUNDATIONS, CORPORATIONS Anonymous Drs. Robert and Beth Krippendorf & ORGANIZATIONS The David and Debbie Chizewer Charitable Fund Howard A. Learner* up Great Lakes water of microbeads Lakes protection $300,000+ Dewoskin/Roskin Foundation Andrew and Janet Lubetkin Aveda Dominion Foundation Sarah Solberg Ludden The Joyce Foundation EarthShare Mr. and Mrs. Theodore B. Martin, Jr. $100,000 - $299,999 EarthShare Ohio Ann McGill Charles Stewart Mott Foundation The Eckroth Planning Group, Inc.* Katherine Newhouse The George Gund Foundation Environmental Consulting & Technology, Inc.* Nicholas and Susan Noyes ANNUAL REPORT 2015 Grand Victoria Foundation ERM Group Foundation, Inc. John and Katie Palmer WaterMarks McDougal Family Foundation Fuzzy Math, LLC Clifford and Cheryl Pixler Metabolic Studio G. William Walker Trust David Reinisch and Julie Kiefer Fund* Shaw and Betty Walker Foundation Harmann Family Fund of the Greater Cincinnati Anthony and Jacquelyn Sartoris Photo courtesy of Deborah Ramstorf $50,000 - $99,999 Foundation Pamela Schaefer Photo courtesy of James Dagg Anonymous Josiah Macy Jr. Foundation Rachel Schneider Deborah Ramstorf’s passion for Lake Michigan The Brookby Foundation Kornblith and Lasser Family Fund of the Jewish Theresann and David Seeger* is rooted in memories of childhood beach Paddle Relay organizer James Dagg, left, with Greg The Crown Family Communal Fund Sanjiv Sinha and Ana Sirviente visits there with her father.
    [Show full text]
  • Building a Clean Water Legacy LETTER from the PRESIDENT & CEO
    Fall 2019 Building A Clean Water Legacy LETTER FROM THE PRESIDENT & CEO Building A Clean Water Legacy This summer we marked the anniversaries of two grim Great Lakes events. Fifty years ago, the Cuyahoga River was so polluted it caught on fire. Five years ago, a harmful algal bloom turned toxic and shut down access to safe drinking water in Toledo, Ohio. Both anniversaries mark clean water threats that also sparked major movements across the Great Lakes and the nation to clean up our water. While much work remains to rescue Lake Erie, we see huge gains in the fifty years since the Cuyahoga fire that captivated the nation, proving that we can reclaim the water that belongs to us all. Next year, we’ll celebrate 50 years since the founding of Lake Michigan Federation, which would grow to become the Alliance for the Great Lakes. That same year saw the establishment of the United States Environmental Protection Agency. And in the years that followed, Congress passed the Clean Water Act and many of our nation’s bedrock water protections. Next year also marks five years since our leadership in the passage of the Microbead Free Waters Act of 2015, the largest national action preventing plastic pollution to date. As I reflect on the past and present of our movement, I feel grateful and humbled to be in the fight for clean water alongside all of you, our supporters and champions. I’ve seen our movement come together to stop microplastic pollution at the community, state, and eventually the federal level.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 6, Number 4 January, February, March 1982 An
    VOLUME 6, NUMBER 4 JANUARY, FEBRUARY, MARCH 1982 PARKS AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR MANAGERS OF NATIONAL PARKS, HISTORIC SITES, AND OTHER PROTECTED AREAS • A\ii l\v PUBLISHED BY THE INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR CONSERVATION OF NATURE AND NATURAL RESOURCES Volume 6, Number 4 January, February, March 1982 FRANCESCO di CASTRI and 1 The Biosphere Reserve Concept: 10 Years After JANE ROBERTSON ARTURO PONCE SALAZAR and 7 Ecuador's Active Conservation Program RICHARD M. HUBER JR. , LEEBOTTS 11 Swamps Are Important for People, Too MARK BLACKSELL 14 The Spirit and Purpose of National Parks in Britain 17 PARK TECHNIQUES An Interview with 17 Conservation of Photographic Collections EUGENE OSTROFF ROYAL SOCIETY FOR THE 21 The Design and Siting of a Standard Birdwatching Hide PROTECTION OF BIRDS COUNTRYSIDE COMMISSION 22 Timber Piling Causeway FOR SCOTLAND 23 CNPPA NOTES 24 BOOKS & NOTICES Front cover: Looking north from Sperry Glacier (left foreground) into the immense wilderness of Glacier National Park in the USA. With an area of over 400,000 hectares, the Park is one of the largest Biosphere Reserves under Unesco's MAB program. The dark peak in the right central part of the picture is the Little Matterhorn. Photo: Tom J. Hileman Second class postage paid at Washington, D. C. Parks Canada, U.S. National Park Service, has been reprinted in the issue from an PARKS (USPS 397-270) is issued quarterly. Ministere de l'Environnement— D.P.N., of identified source publication. In such event no Published at Room 3121,1100 L Street, N. W., France, and the World Wildlife Fund.
    [Show full text]
  • Chicago Wilderness and Its Biodiversity Recovery Plan
    Chapter 1 Executive Summary Chicago Wilderness and Its Biodiversity Recovery Plan Many of the surviving natural communities of the 1. 1 Chicago region are of national and global significance In t r o d u c t i o n for conservation. The region is blessed with both richness and opportunity for its conservation. Yet res e a r ch indi- cates that we are experiencing a steady decline in both 1.1.1 Chicago Wilderness: who we are, native species and communities. For example: what we are accomplishing. • In a review for this plan, the Chicago Wi l d e r n e s s “Chicago Wilderness” refers to nature and to the people Science and Land Management Teams found that and institutions that protect it. Chicago Wilderness is m o re than half of the major community types of the 200,000 acres of protected conservation land—some of region were at the highest level of conservation con- the largest and best surviving woodlands, wetlands, and cern due either to the small amount remaining or to prairies in the Midwest. It is also the much larger matrix the poor ecological health of the remaining examples. of public and private lands of many kinds that support • A 1995 survey of DuPage County forest pre s e r v e s na t ur e in the region along with the people who prot e c t revealed that 80% of its natural areas had declined to and live compatibly with it. poor health (Applied Ecological Services 1995). Native Americans were part of the natural ecosystem • A region-wide 1998 study by the Morton Ar b o re t u m he r e for thousands of years.
    [Show full text]