Speech by Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry Chief

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Speech by Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry Chief SPEECH BY MR. JUSTICE IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY CHIEF JUSTICE OF PAKISTAN AT THE FAREWELL DINNER HOSTED BY VICE CHAIRMAN THE SINDH BAR COUNCIL, ON 27.11.2013 2 My brother, Judges of the Supreme Court of Pakistan; Learned Chief Justice and Judges of the High Court of Sindh; Mr. Muhammad Aqil, Vice Chairman and members of the Sindh Bar Council; Learned office bearers of the Bar Associations; Learned members of the bar; Ladies and Gentlemen: Assalam-o-Alaikum! It is a great privilege for me to attend this farewell Dinner, hosted by the Sindh Bar Council, in my honor. I am delighted to speak to this august gathering of legal luminaries and jurists on the occasion. It is not the first time that I have an opportunity to address the members of the Bar. Earlier, I have participated in various seminars/conferences arranged by the members of the Bar. Even in April, 2007 when the judiciary was under attack, I was invited to address a lawyers’ convention held here. Here, I must acknowledge the role of the Bar Associations of Sindh who had played pivotal role for constitutionalism, rule of law and independence of judiciary. During the days when I was unconstitutionally made dysfunctional, it was in furtherance of the lawyers’ protest against the illegal and unconstitutional measures that I visited Karachi and addressed the lawyers’ community. I still remember the era of the struggle for Supremacy of Constitution & Rule of Law when the Sindh Bar Council and Bar Associations of Sindh carried out a movement for restoration of judiciary and in the process they suffered a great deal. They suffered financially and offered blood to keep the card of constitution alive. 2 3 History still have on its pages the firm commitments of the legal community, when in early 2008, the Bar of Sindh urged the Federal and Punjab Governments to refrain from unconstitutional and unlawful house arrest of members of legal community. They also warned that if their colleagues were not released forthwith, the lawyers all over the country would start an agitation campaign by staging hunger strikes and courting arrests. I must admit here that Bar of Sindh proved to be the first drop of rain that became a torrent which swept all the hurdles which came in the way of rule of law movement and resulted in the restoration of judiciary. I personally thanked the Lawyer community of the Sindh, as such by and large each and every member of the bar took ownership and responsibility of the Judicial System, and performed their part efficiently. Above all, I am fortunate enough that I had the privilege of their unwavering support and cooperation and benefited from their invaluable suggestions and ideas. Ladies and Gentlemen: Pakistan is perhaps one of the most regulated countries in the world with a plethora of laws, yet the cherished goal of providing justice to the people remains illusive. It is the inefficiency of our legal system which has compromised its effectiveness. The procedures, rules, regulations and practices forming the basic fabric of the system were conceived in the 19th century and were perhaps best suited to the times. The problems requiring solutions through litigation have changed dramatically both in magnitude and complexity. We have failed to keep up. We are trying to solve 21st century problems with 19th century tools. 3 4 Merely using modern technology is not sufficient to modernize the legal system. It is our mindset which too needs to be synchronized with the 21st century. At the end of the day it is not brick and mortar alone which forms the courts, but rather men and women who populate these buildings that really matter. Problems are faced by the bar and the bench jointly, therefore they must be dealt with and solved jointly. The relationship between the bar and the bench neither is nor should be allowed to become adversarial. It must be participatory. The lines of communication must always remain open facilitating a free flow of ideas so that the bar can take ownership of the endeavours for improvement in the administration of justice. Please permit me to state that the bench and the bar are only the trustees of our legal system. The true and real beneficiaries are the people of Pakistan who have an inalienable right enshrined in the Constitution to be provided with justice efficiently and effectively. Therefore ancient administrative practices that retard the smooth functioning of the judicial process need to be identified and weeded out. I am confidant that the apex Court and District Courts shall move forward steadily on the road to progress. I am confident too that the lawyers will meet the challenge and demand of the present and of the future. I am also confident that each one of you will look at your profession as a high calling, and always uphold the dignity of this esteemed profession. Indeed, in the afore going context, the get together like todays farewell reception hosted by the Vice Chairman of Sindh Bar council affords us a good opportunity to remind ourselves about what our priorities should be. With these words, I would like to close by thanking, the Vice Chairman of Sindh Bar Council including the other distinguish office 4 5 bearers & members of the Bar, for giving me this rare privilege and opportunity to address such a distinguished legal fraternity. Thank You! 5.
Recommended publications
  • (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit At
    Order Sheet IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH, CIRCUIT COURT, HYDERABAD CP No. D- 807 of 2020 BEFORE : Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon Date of hearing & decision: 25.08.2020 Petitioner : Jagdesh R. Mullani, in person Respondent No.1 : through Mr. Ghulam Shabbir Shar, Advocate Respondent No.2 : Nemo. Respondent No.3: through Mr. Allah Bachayo Soomro, Addl.A.G. Respondent No.4 : Mr. Farhad Ali Abro, in person & Mr. Ayaz Hussain Tunio, Advocate On Court notice : Mr. Muhammad Humayoon Khan, D.A.G. O R D E R ADNAN-UL-KARIM MEMON, J: - Principally, through instant Petition, the Petitioner has asked for issuance of Writ against Respondent No.4 to vacate the office of Acting President Sindh High Court Bar Association, Hyderabad (SHBAH) and seeking declaration to the effect that the orders dated 01st June 2020 and 08th June, 2020 respectively passed by Sindh Bar Council and Chairman Appeal Committee Pakistan Bar Council (Sindh) are illegal, void ab initio and contrary to the Legal Practitioners Bar Council Act, 1973, and Pakistan Bar Council Rules 1986. He also seeks direction to Sindh Bar Council to issue Notification in his favour as President Sindh High Court Bar Association, Hyderabad after elevation of earlier President as Member Election Commission of Pakistan on the ground that he being contesting candidate, having secured highest number of votes next after the member, is entitled to be appointed as President Sindh High Court Bar Association, Hyderabad. Petitioner in support of his version has heavily relied upon paragraph 15 of the Memorandum and Articles of Association of Sindh High Court Bar Association Hyderabad, coupled with Rule 21 of the Bar Association (Recognition) Rules, 2017 (Model Bye-Laws) framed by Sindh Bar Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Act, 1973
    Legal Practitioners & Bar Councils Act, 1973 1 LEGAL PRACTITIONERS AND BAR COUNCILS ACT, 1973 [ACT XXXV OF 1973] An Act to repeal and, with certain modifications, re-enact the law relating to legal practitioners and bar councils The following Act of the National Assembly received the assent of the President on the 22nd February, 1973, and is hereby published for general information:- Whereas it is expedient to repeal and, with certain modifications, re-enact the law relating to Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils and to provide for certain incidental and ancillary matters; It is hereby enacted as follows:- CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY 1. Short title and commencement.--(1) This Act may be called the Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Act, 1973. (2) It shall come into force at once. 1[1A. Overriding effect.--The provisions of this Act shall have effect notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in any other law for the time being in force.] 2. Definitions.--ln this Act, unless there is anything repugnant in the subject or context,-- 2[(a) "Advocate" means an advocate entered in any roll under the provisions of this Act;] (b) "Bar Council" means a Bar Council constituted under this Act; (c) "Common roll" means the common roll of advocates of the High Court or, as the case may be, the common roll of other advocates prepared and maintained by the Pakistan Bar Council under this Act; 3[(cc) Omitted]; 1. Inserted vide Legal Practitioners & Bar Councils (Amendment) Act, (Act No. XII of 2005). 2. The original clause (a) of Section 2 reads as under:-- (a) "advocate" means an advocate entered in any roll under the provisions of this Act".
    [Show full text]
  • Judicial Commission of Pakistan Learned Members
    JUDICIAL COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN LEARNED MEMBERS 1. Mr. Justice Asif Saeed Khan Khosa Chairman Chief Justice of Pakistan Supreme Court of Pakistan 2. Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed Member Senior Puisne Judge Supreme Court of Pakistan 3. Mr. Justice Sh. Azmat Saeed Member Judge, Supreme Court of Pakistan 4. Mr. Justice Mushir Alam Member Judge, Supreme Court of Pakistan 5. Mr. Justice Umar Ata Bandial Member Judge, Supreme Court of Pakistan 6. Mr. Justice Raja Fayyaz Ahmed Member Former Judge Supreme Court of Pakistan 7. Dr. Muhammad Farogh Naseem Member Federal Minister of Law and Justice Government of Pakistan 8. Mr. Anwar Mansoor Khan Member Attorney General for Pakistan Supreme Court Building 9. Mr. Muhammad Yousuf Laghari Member Senior Advocate, Supreme Court & Member Pakistan Bar Council Federal Shariat Court 1. Mr. Justice Shaikh Najam ul Hassan Member Chief Justice Federal Shariat Court 2. Mr. Justice Fida Muhammad Khan Member Judge Federal Shariat Court High Court of Sindh 1. Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Sheikh Member Chief Justice High Court of Sindh 2. Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan Member Senior Pusine Judge High Court of Sindh 3. Member Minister of Law and Prison Government of Sindh 4. Ms. Noor Naz Agha Member Member Sindh Bar Council Peshawar High Court 1. Mr. Justice Waqar Ahmad Seth Member Chief Justice Peshawar High Court 2. Mr. Justice Qaiser Rashid Khan Member Senior Puisne Judge Peshawar High Court 3. Mr. Sultan Muhammad Khan Member Minister for Law Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 4. Mr. Shah Jehan Khan Swati Member Member Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Bar Council High Court of Balochistan 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Pro Bono Practices and Opportunities in Pakistan1 I. Introduction the Pro
    Pro Bono Practices and Opportunities in Pakistan 1 I. Introduction The pro bono environment in Pakistan is nascent, but is growing gradually. At present, Pakistan has a two-pronged structure for legal aid i.e. under the Pakistan Bar Council Free Legal Aid Rules, 1999 and District Legal Empowerment Committee (Constitution & Function) Rules, 2011. While the regulatory framework is present, there remains a strong need for further action amongst the legal community - there is a serious underutilization of funds allocated to institutions and committees responsible for providing legal aid, which in turn demonstrates a lack of will and resolve. The gap left by lack of implementation of the legal aid framework at a government level is to some extent filled by local and international non- governmental organizations, as well as a handful of domestic law firms, which offer legal services to the country’s underserved populations and are engaged in direct representation and broader reform work. II. Overview of Pro Bono Practices (a) Professional Regulation 1. Describe the laws/rules that regulate the provision of The practice of law in Pakistan is primarily legal services? governed by the Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Act of 1973, last amended on 01 June 2018 (the " Bar Councils Act "). 2 The Bar Councils Act established the Pakistan Bar Council, as well as the four provincial bar councils, namely the Punjab Bar Council, the Sindh Bar Council, the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Bar Council and the Baluchistan Bar Council (together, the " Provincial Bar Councils ") 3 and a bar council for the Islamabad Capital Territory, namely the Islamabad Bar Council.
    [Show full text]
  • SUPREME COURT of PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD FINAL CAUSE LIST 13 of 2018 from 26-Mar to 30-Mar-2018 for Fixation and Result of Cases, Please Visit
    SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD FINAL CAUSE LIST 13 of 2018 From 26-Mar to 30-Mar-2018 For fixation and result of cases, please visit www.supremecourt.gov.pk The following cases are fixed for hearing before the Court at Islamabad during the week commencing 26-Mar-2018 at 09:00 AM or soon thereafter as may be convenient to the Court. (i) No application for adjournment through fax/email will be placed before the Court. If any counsel is unable to appear for any reason, the Advocate-on-Record will be required to argue the case. (ii) No adjournment on any ground will be granted. BENCH - I MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR, HCJ MR. JUSTICE UMAR ATA BANDIAL MR. JUSTICE IJAZ UL AHSAN Monday, 26-Mar-2018 1 C.A.1178/2008 Haji Baz Muhammad and another v. Noor Mr. Abdus Salim Ansari, AOR (Qta) (Specific Performance) Ali and another (Enrl#229) (D.B.) Mr. Kamran Murtaza, ASC (Qta) (Enrl#2333) Mr. Rizwan Ejaz, ASC (Enrl#4107) (Qta) R Ex-Parte Mr. Ahmed Nawaz Chaudhry, AOR (Enrl#243) Mr. Zulfikar Khalid Maluka, ASC (Ibd) (Enrl#2752) 2 C.A.182-P/2013 Muhammad Fateh Khan & others v. Land Mr. Tasleem Hussain, AOR (Pesh) (Land Acquisition) Acquisition Collector Swabi Scarp, (Enrl#187) (S.J.) WAPDA Mardan & others Muhammad Asif Khan, ASC Mir Adam Khan, AOR (Enrl#185) (Pesh) Mr. Mahmudul Islam, AOR (Lhr) (Enrl#177) Mr. Aurangzeb Mirza, ASC (Lhr) (Enrl#2706) and(2) C.A.194-P/2013 Nawabzada Mohammad Usman Khan v. Mr. Muhammad Ajmal Khan, AOR (Pesh) (Land Acquisition) Land Acquisition Collector Swabi Scarp, (Enrl#225) (S.J.) Mardan & others Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Practitioners & Bar Councils Act, 1973
    Legal Practitioners & Bar Councils Act, 1973 1 LEGAL PRACTITIONERS AND BAR COUNCILS ACT, 1973 [ACT XXXV OF 1973] An Act to repeal and, with certain modifications, re-enact the law relating to legal practitioners and bar councils The following Act of the National Assembly received the assent of the President on the 22nd February, 1973, and is hereby published for general information: - Whereas it is expedient to repeal and, with certain modifications, re-enact the law relating to Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils and to provide for certain incidental and ancillary matters; It is hereby enacted as follows: - CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY 1. Short title and commencement.--(1) This Act may be called the Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Act, 1973. (2) It shall come into force at once. 1[1A. Overriding effect.--The provisions of this Act shall have effect notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in any other law for the time being in force.] 2. Definitions.--ln this Act, unless there is anything repugnant in the subject or context,-- 2[(a) "Advocate" means an advocate entered in any roll under the provisions of this Act;] (b) "Bar Council" means a Bar Council constituted under this Act; (c) "Common roll" means the common roll of advocates of the High Court or, as the case may be, the common roll of other advocates prepared and maintained by the Pakistan Bar Council under this Act; 1. Inserted vide Legal Practitioners & Bar Councils (Amendment) Act, (Act No. XII of 2005). 2. The original clause (a) of Section 2 reads as under:-- (a) "advocate" means an advocate entered in any roll under the provisions of this Act".
    [Show full text]
  • Baseline Report Lawyher.Pk
    The State of Women’s Representation in Law 2020-21 Baseline Report 1 © 2021 Lawyher.pk. All rights reserved. Any part of this publication may be reproduced by duly acknowledging the source. Every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the contents of this publication. Lawyher.pk takes no responsibility for any unintentional omissions. Lawyher.pk has reproduced the images included in this publication under a fair-use policy, intending no copyright infringement, and has credited all sources. All data has been obtained from official sources including official websites, official correspondence and communications with concerned officials and official publications such as directories. The sources and the date at which the information was obtained have been cited in the report along with the data. Any limitations have also been highlighted in the footnotes and accompanying notes. Lawyher.pk Suite No. 33 First Floor Sadiq Plaza Shahrah e Quaid e Azam Lahore, Pakistan. E: [email protected] | www.lawyher.pk Written by: Nida Usman Chaudhary Design and Layout: Ali Abbas 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This study would not have been possible without the support of the Federal Ministry of Law and Justice, Australian High Commission, British High Commission, Group Development Pakistan, Parliamentary Secretary, Federal Ministry of Law and Justice, Ms. Maleeka Bokhari, Ms. Valerie Khan, Executive Director, Group Development Pakistan, Mr. Usman Arshad, Ms. Eshm Suhaib, coordinator for the project increasing women’s representation in law, Ms. Sara Raza, Advocate and volunteer on the project increasing women’s representation in law. We also want to acknowledge the support from Mr. Faisal Siddiqui ASC, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2020
    1 Annual Report | Year 2020 2 Annual Report | Year 2020 INFO 2 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh Hon’ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar Chief Justice High Court of Sindh, Judge High Court of Sindh, Chairman, Board of Governors, SJA Acting Director General, SJA EDITORIAL BOARD EXECUTIVE EDITOR: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ali Aslam Jafri EXECUTIVE EDITOR: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hasan Feroz Former Judge High Court of Sindh Principal SM Law College, Karachi Former Judge High Court of Sindh SENIOR EDITOR: EDITOR: Mr. Muhammad Shahid Shafiq Mr. Aftab Ahmed Bajwa District & Sessions Judge, Commander (R) PN Senior Faculty Member, SJA Administrative Officer, SJA WRITER/ CONTENT MANAGER: HONORARY ASSOCIATE EDITOR: Mr. Muhammad Murtaza Khan Barrister Syed Shahbal Ali I.T Expert/Faculty Member, SJA Advocate, High Court of Sindh SUPPORT STAFF: DESIGNED & FORMATTED BY: I.T SUPPORT: Syed Noman Shah Mr. Qazi Ishaq Ahmed Assistant to SFM/D&SJ, SJA IT Department, SJA GRAPHICS DESIGNED BY: PHOTOGRAPHY: Mr. Saqib Hussain Abbasi Mr. Irfan Jawed Assistant to SFM/D&SJ, SJA Assistant, Admin Department, SJA This Annual Report is Designed & Published by: Sindh Judicial Academy, Judges Bungalows 1 & 2, Ferozenana Road, Bath Island, Clifton , Karachi, Pakistan +92-21-99250629, [email protected] Annual Report | Year 2020 3 S# TITLE PAGE NO. 01 MESSAGES • Message of Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh Chief Justice, High Court of Sindh and Chairman BoG, SJA 04 - 05 • Message of Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar Judge, High Court of Sindh and Acting Director
    [Show full text]
  • SEAFARER SUBJECT GUIDE USING LAWYERS in PAKISTAN This
    SEAFARER SUBJECT GUIDE USING LAWYERS IN PAKISTAN This Guide deals in general terms with engaging lawyers in Pakistan. It aims to help a seafarer understand the legal profession in Pakistan, and how to select, engage, and if need be, change his lawyer. This Guide does not, however, constitute specific legal advice in relation to the use of any particular lawyer. If a seafarer is dissatisfied with his lawyer, he is strongly advised to consult another lawyer qualified to practice in Pakistan. 1. What is the structure of the legal profession? 1.1. All practicing lawyers are known as advocates, who work either on their own or as part of a law firm. There is therefore no distinction here between barristers and solicitors. However, in the Supreme Court there is a semblance of a distinction between barristers and solicitors in as much as a litigate in the Supreme Court has to engage an advocate on record and also an advocate of the Supreme Court. An advocate on record acts like a solicitor and an advocate of the Supreme Court acts as a barrister, arguing the case before the Supreme Court. 1.2. The legal profession is not a referral profession. A seafarer requiring legal assistance has to approach an advocate who can then take the brief and deal with it until it is concluded. 1.3. An advocate can advise on any legal matter, including criminal and civil matters. He can appear in the Session Courts consisting of Judicial Magistrates and District Session Judges (which are criminal courts) and before the District Courts, where civil claims not exceeding Rs.15 million are handled at least in so far as Karachi, in the Province of Sindh is concerned.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Version Ouagadougou Conference
    TABLE OF CONTENTS Page DELIBERATIONS 106th Inter-Parliamentary Conference 1. Inaugural Ceremony ..................................................................................................... 4 2. Participation ................................................................................................................. 4 3. Modification of the Conference Programme ..................................................................... 5 4. Choice of a Supplementary Item .................................................................................... 5 5. Choice of an Emergency Supplementary Item ................................................................... 6 6. Proceedings and Decisions of the Conference and its Study Committees................................ 6 169th Session of the Council of the Inter-Parliamentary Union 1. Membership of the Union ............................................................................................. 8 2. Reform of the Inter-Parliamentary Union ......................................................................... 8 3. Cooperation with the United Nations System ................................................................... 9 4. Programme and Budget for the Year 2002 and other Financial Matters .................................. 9 5. Recent specialised Conferences and Meetings ................................................................... 10 6. Reports of Plenary Bodies and Subsidiary Committees ......................................................... 11 7. Human
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Act, 1973
    Pakistan Legal Practitioners & Bar Councils Rules, 1976______________________________1 PREFACE I am delighted to write the preface of this latest edition of the Legal Practitioners & Bar Councils Act, 1973 and the Rules made thereunder, which is an official publication of the Pakistan Bar Council. The last edition was published in 1989 when, for the first time, the details of original tests of all those provisions, which were either omitted or amended, from time to time, were placed at the footnotes, to facilitate making comparison between the original texts of such provisions with amended ones. For compiling and publishing the last edition strenuous efforts were made by Mr. Muhammad Arshed, Secretary, Pakistan Bar Council which are acknowledged with appreciation. In view of number of amendments made in different Rules and enactment of some new Rules by the Pakistan Bar Council since 1989, it was thought appropriate to publish the new edition. While updating this edition efforts have been made to incorporate in it all the relevant amendments made so far. This is, therefore, an authentic version of the Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Act and the Rules made by the Pakistan Bar Council, thereunder. It is hoped that this publication will prove useful to all concerned. (Abdul Hakeem Khan H. Bijarani) Chairman Executive Committee Pakistan Bar Council Pakistan Legal Practitioners & Bar Councils Rules, 1976______________________________2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Pages 1. Legal Practitioners & Bar Councils Act, ……. 1 -69 1973 2. Pakistan Legal Practitioners & ……. 70-173 Bar Council Rules, 1976 3. Pakistan Bar Council ……. 174-181 Legal Education Rules, 1978. 4. Affiliation of Law Colleges Rules.
    [Show full text]
  • The Legal Framework to Inculcate CPD in Pakistan
    The Legal Framework To Inculcate CPD In Pakistan By: Ahmad Nazir Warraich I- INTRODUCTION II- CURRENT LEGAL FRAMEWORK III- INTERNATIONAL BEST PRACTICES IV- SUGGESTED CHANGES IN THE LAW AND RULES IN PAKISTAN. V- CONCLUSION. INTRODUCTION Continuous professional development (CPD), is the ongoing training of a professional throughout his or her career. It is separate and distinct from the original degree course and professional or vocational training which is often mandated at the start of the career. The purpose of CPD is “.. the maintenance and enhancement of a lawyer's or paralegal's professional knowledge, skills, attitudes and professionalism throughout the individual's career. It is a positive tool that benefits lawyers and paralegals and is an essential component of the commitment they make to the public to practice law or provide legal services competently and ethically”. The professionals are required to maintain and improve their skill and competence through such periodic systematized trainings. This is a well established practice in various professions all over the world. In Pakistan, to become a lawyer, a person has to do bachelors and get a law degree. The LL.B course is designed to impart the minimum necessary knowledge of the law of the land to would be lawyers so as to help them practice the profession. In addition the six months training course is meant to provide some bare minimum skills necessary for practicing the vocation. However, this education and training alone, is inadequate to provide all the skills and necessary knowledge required by lawyers to practice this noble profession. It is because of this that in many countries of the world, professional development is an ongoing process.
    [Show full text]