Accelerator Physics* Accelerator Physics Overview: Outline 1 Overview Prof

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Accelerator Physics* Accelerator Physics Overview: Outline 1 Overview Prof Accelerator Physics* Accelerator Physics Overview: Outline 1 Overview Prof. Steven M. Lund 2 Quadrupole and Dipole Fields and the Lorentz Force Equation Physics and Astronomy Department 3 Dipole Bending and Particle Rigidity Facility for Rare Isotope Beams (FRIB) 4 Quadrupole Focusing and Transfer Matrices Michigan State University (MSU) 5 Combined Focusing and Bending 6 Stability of Particle Orbits in a Periodic Focusing Lattice 7 Phase­Amplitude Form of the Particle Orbit 8 Beam Phase­Space Area / Emittance 9 Effects of Momentum Spread 10 Illustrative Example: Fragment Separator Exotic Beam Summer School 11 Conclusions Michigan State University References National Super Conducting Cyclotron Laboratory (NSCL) 18­19 July, 2016 (Version 20160731) * Research supported by: FRIB/MSU, 2014 onward via: U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Cooperative Agreement DE­SC0000661and National Science Foundation Grant No. PHY­1102511 SM Lund, EBSS, 2016 Accelerator Physics 1 SM Lund, EBSS, 2016 Accelerator Physics 2 1. Overview In nuclear physics, accelerators are used to produce beams of Accelerators tend to be viewed by specialists in other fields as a “black box” producing important rare isotopes particles with some parameters Accelerator Start with the stable isotopes (black) and make all the others Application r e b m u N But accelerator science and technology is a highly developed field enabling a broad range n of discovery science and industry o r t Discovery Science: u High Energy (Colliders) and Nuclear Physics (Cyclotrons, Rings, Linacs) e N Materials Science (Light Sources) Industrial: Semiconductor Processing, Material Processing, Welding Green – New territory to be Medical: X­Rays, Tumor Therapy, Sterilization explored with next-generation Modern, large­scale accelerator facilities are a monument to modern technology and take a blue – around 3000 rare isotope facilities large number of specialists working effectively together to develop and maintain known isotopes Only briefly survey a small part of linear optics in this lecture …. much much more ! Neutron Number SM Lund, EBSS, 2016 Accelerator Physics 3 SM Lund, EBSS, 2016 Accelerator Physics 4 Accelerators for rare isotope production Cyclotrons • The particle accelerator used for production is called the “driver” Continuous train of particle bunches injected from center and spiral outward on RF acceleration over many laps. Exits machine on last lap to impinge on target. • Types ● Relatively easy to operate – Cyclotron NSCL (USA; MSU), GANIL (France), TRIUMF (proton; Canada), and tune (few parts) HRIBF (proton; USA ORNL), RIKEN RIBF (Japan) • Used for isotope production – Synchroton GSI, FAIR-GSI (Germany); IMP (China) and applications where reliable and reproducible – LINAC (LINear ACcelerator) FRIB (USA; MSU), ATLAS (USA; ANL), operation are important RAON (Korea) (medical) – Others like FFAGs (Fixed-Field Alternating Gradient) • Intensity low (but continuous train of bunches) due to not currently used but considered limited transverse focusing, • Main Parameters acceleration efficiency is – Max Kinetic Energy (e.g. FRIB will have 200 MeV/u uranium ions) high, cost low – Particle Range (TRIUMF cyclotron accelerates hydrogen, used for spallation) • Relativity limits energy gain, – Intensity or Beam Power (e.g. 400 kW = 8x6x1012/s x 50GeV so energy is limited to a few hundred MeV/u. – Power = pμA x Beam Energy (GeV) ( 1pμA = 6x1012 /s) • State of art for heavy ions: http://images.yourdictionary.com/cyclotron RIKEN (Japan) Superconducting Cyclotron 350 MeV/u SM Lund, EBSS, 2016 Accelerator Physics 5 SM Lund, EBSS, 2016 Accelerator Physics 6 Cyclotron example: NSCL’s coupled cyclotron facility Synchrotrons D.J. Morrissey, B.M. Sherrill, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. A “train” of bunches injected to fill ring and then bunches in ring accelerated 356 (1998) 1985. while bending and focusing rise synchronously. At max energy bunch train is 86 78 K500 Example: Kr → Ni kicked out of ring and impinges on target. Then next cycle is loaded. ion sources • Can achieve high energy at modest cost – tend to be used to coupling 86Kr14+, line 12 MeV/u deliver the highest energies K1200 • Intensity is limited by the Coulomb A1900 focal plane force of particles within bunches (Space Charge) p/p = 5% • production transmission The magnets (bend and focus) 86Kr34+, target stripping of 65% of the must rapidly ramp and this can be foil 140 MeV/u produced 78Ni difficult to do for superconducting wedge magnets • Machine must be refilled for next fragment yield after target fragment yield after wedge fragment yield at focal plane operating cycle giving up average intensity due to overall duty factor • State of the art for heavy ions now under construction: FAIR http://universe-review.ca/R15-20-accelerators.htm (Germany) and IMP/Lanzhou + CERN LHC for p-p (Higgs) SM Lund, EBSS, 2016 Accelerator Physics 7 SM Lund, EBSS, 2016 Accelerator Physics 8 Example synchrotron: Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research LINAC (LINear ACcelerator) (FAIR), GSI Germany A continuous “train” of bunches injected into a straight lattice for acceleration • Beams at 1.5 GeV/u with strong transverse focusing and RF acceleration • 1012/s Uranium • Many types for ions, protons, and DESY LINAC segment • Research electrons and has simpler physics than (XFEL driver) – Rare isotopes rings. Applications from industrial and – Antiproton small medical to discovery science. – Atomic physics • Intensity can be very high since – Compressed matter compatible with strong transverse – Plasma physics focusing and a continuous train of bunches • Under construction with significant delays but front • Retuning for ions can be complex end working/upgraded • Can use superconducting RF cavities for high efficiency but at high cost/complication • Cost can be high (RF cavities one pass: need high gradient) http://www.fair-center.de/index.php?id=1 • Used to provide the highest intensities • State of art for heavy ions: FRIB folded linac (MSU) under construction SM Lund, EBSS, 2016 Accelerator Physics 9 SM Lund, EBSS, 2016 Accelerator Physics 10 Example LINAC: Facility for Rare Isotope Beams (FRIB) 2. Quadrupole and Dipole Fields and the Lorentz Force Equation Consider a long static magnet where we can approximate the fields as 2D transverse within • 200 MeV/u, 400 KW the vacuum aperture: continuous power on- target with heavy ions • Superconducting RF Taylor expand for small x,y about origin and retain only linear terms of “right” symmetry: cavities and solenoid 0 0 0 0 0 focusing • Novel liquid Li stripper to boost charge state and simultaneously Via: symmetry choices and design accelerates several Maxwell equation for a static magnetic field in a vacuum aperture: species to increase power on target • Under construction: front end undergoing early commissioning in 2016 Superconducting RF cavities Giving: 4 types ≈ 344 total E ≈ 30 MV/m peak β = β = β = β = 0.04 0.08 0.2 0.5 SM Lund, EBSS, 2016 Accelerator Physics 11 SM Lund, EBSS, 2016 Accelerator Physics 12 Magnets Elements of accelerator are typically separated by function into Magnet design is a complicated topic … but some examples of elements to produce these a sequence of elements making up a “lattice” static magnetic fields: Example – Linear FODO lattice (symmetric quadrupole doublet) for a LINAC Idealized Structure Laboratory Magnet tpe_lat_fodo.png e l o p i D Example – Synchrotron lattice with quadrupole triplet focusing India: Dept Atomic Eng ring.png e l o p u r d a u Q Canada: TRIUMF SM Lund, EBSS, 2016 Accelerator Physics 13 SM Lund, EBSS, 2016 Accelerator Physics 14 Lorentz force equation for particle of charge q and mass m evolving in magnetic field: 3. Dipole Bending and Particle Rigidity Magnetic field only bends particle without change in energy: Illustrative Case: Particle bent in a uniform magnetic field Particle is bent on a circular arc so Lorentz force equation gives: Simplified Lorentz force equation giving the particle evolution in the field: Putting in the expanded field of our specific form of interest: Beam is directed, so assume particle primarily moving longitudinally with: Dipole bends are used to manipulate “reference” path Rings Transfer Lines and also manipulate focusing properties since bend radius depends on energy Fragment Separators for nuclear physics SM Lund, EBSS, 2016 Accelerator Physics 15 SM Lund, EBSS, 2016 Accelerator Physics 16 Rigidity measures the particle coupling strength to magnetic field For ions take: and kinetic energy per nucleon [MeV/u] fixes Set in terms of: Particle Species: Common measure of energy since determines synchronism with RF fields for Particle Kinetic Energy: acceleration and bunching Units are Tesla­meters and is read as one symbol “B­rho” Electrons Ions (and approx Protons) Heavy ions much more “rigid” than electrons and require higher fields to move: Electron: Ion: Particle kinetic energy sets : ekin_e.png ekin_i.png Electrons are much less “rigid” than ions and are deflected with lower field strength SM Lund, EBSS, 2016 Accelerator Physics 17 SM Lund, EBSS, 2016 Accelerator Physics 18 4. Quadrupole Focusing and Transfer Matrices Transfer Matrix Solutions Illustrative Case: Focused within a quadrupole magnetic field Integrate equation from initial condition: Free drift: Write linear phase­space solutions in 2x2 “Transfer Matrix” form: Let s be the axial coordinate (will later bend on curved path in dipole) and assume beam motion is primarily longitudinally (s) directed + analogous for
Recommended publications
  • Accelerator and Beam Physics Research Goals and Opportunities
    Accelerator and Beam Physics Research Goals and Opportunities Working group: S. Nagaitsev (Fermilab/U.Chicago) Chair, Z. Huang (SLAC/Stanford), J. Power (ANL), J.-L. Vay (LBNL), P. Piot (NIU/ANL), L. Spentzouris (IIT), and J. Rosenzweig (UCLA) Workshops conveners: Y. Cai (SLAC), S. Cousineau (ORNL/UT), M. Conde (ANL), M. Hogan (SLAC), A. Valishev (Fermilab), M. Minty (BNL), T. Zolkin (Fermilab), X. Huang (ANL), V. Shiltsev (Fermilab), J. Seeman (SLAC), J. Byrd (ANL), and Y. Hao (MSU/FRIB) Advisors: B. Dunham (SLAC), B. Carlsten (LANL), A. Seryi (JLab), and R. Patterson (Cornell) January 2021 Abbreviations and Acronyms 2D two-dimensional 3D three-dimensional 4D four-dimensional 6D six-dimensional AAC Advanced Accelerator Concepts ABP Accelerator and Beam Physics DOE Department of Energy FEL Free-Electron Laser GARD General Accelerator R&D GC Grand Challenge H- a negatively charged Hydrogen ion HEP High-Energy Physics HEPAP High-Energy Physics Advisory Panel HFM High-Field Magnets KV Kapchinsky-Vladimirsky (distribution) ML/AI Machine Learning/Artificial Intelligence NCRF Normal-Conducting Radio-Frequency NNSA National Nuclear Security Administration NSF National Science Foundation OHEP Office of High Energy Physics QED Quantum Electrodynamics rf radio-frequency RMS Root Mean Square SCRF Super-Conducting Radio-Frequency USPAS US Particle Accelerator School WG Working Group 1 Accelerator and Beam Physics 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Accelerators are a key capability for enabling discoveries in many fields such as Elementary Particle Physics, Nuclear Physics, and Materials Sciences. While recognizing the past dramatic successes of accelerator-based particle physics research, the April 2015 report of the Accelerator Research and Development Subpanel of HEPAP [1] recommended the development of a long-term vision and a roadmap for accelerator science and technology to enable future DOE HEP capabilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Accelerator Physics and Modeling
    BNL-52379 CAP-94-93R ACCELERATOR PHYSICS AND MODELING ZOHREH PARSA, EDITOR PROCEEDINGS OF THE SYMPOSIUM ON ACCELERATOR PHYSICS AND MODELING Brookhaven National Laboratory UPTON, NEW YORK 11973 ASSOCIATED UNIVERSITIES, INC. UNDER CONTRACT NO. DE-AC02-76CH00016 WITH THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the Unite1 States Government Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, nor any of their contractors, subcontractors, or their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, doea not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recomm.ndation, or favoring by the UnitedStates Government or any agency, contractor or subcontractor thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency, contractor or subcontractor thereof- Printed in the United States of America Available from National Technical Information Service U.S. Department of Commerce 5285 Port Royal Road Springfieid, VA 22161 NTIS price codes: Am&mffi TABLE OF CONTENTS Topic, Author Page no. Forward, Z . Parsa, Brookhaven National Lab. i Physics of High Brightness Beams , 1 M. Reiser, University of Maryland . Radio Frequency Beam Conditioner For Fast-Wave 45 Free-Electron Generators of Coherent Radiation Li-Hua NSLS Dept., Brookhaven National Lab, and A.
    [Show full text]
  • Nicholas Christofilos and the Astron Project in America's Fusion Program
    Elisheva Coleman May 4, 2004 Spring Junior Paper Advisor: Professor Mahoney Greek Fire: Nicholas Christofilos and the Astron Project in America’s Fusion Program This paper represents my own work in accordance with University regulations The author thanks the Program in Plasma Science and Technology and the Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory for their support. Introduction The second largest building on the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory’s campus today stands essentially abandoned, used as a warehouse for odds and ends. Concrete, starkly rectangular and nondescript, Building 431 was home for over a decade to the Astron machine, the testing device for a controlled fusion reactor scheme devised by a virtually unknown engineer-turned-physicist named Nicholas C. Christofilos. Building 431 was originally constructed in the late 1940s before the Lawrence laboratory even existed, for the Materials Testing Accelerator (MTA), the first experiment performed at the Livermore site.1 By the time the MTA was retired in 1955, the Livermore lab had grown up around it, a huge, nationally funded institution devoted to four projects: magnetic fusion, diagnostic weapon experiments, the design of thermonuclear weapons, and a basic physics program.2 When the MTA shut down, its building was turned over to the lab’s controlled fusion department. A number of fusion experiments were conducted within its walls, but from the early sixties onward Astron predominated, and in 1968 a major extension was added to the building to accommodate a revamped and enlarged Astron accelerator. As did much material within the national lab infrastructure, the building continued to be recycled. After Astron’s termination in 1973 the extension housed the Experimental Test Accelerator (ETA), a prototype for a huge linear induction accelerator, the type of accelerator first developed for Astron.
    [Show full text]
  • Cyclotrons: Old but Still New
    Cyclotrons: Old but Still New The history of accelerators is a history of inventions William A. Barletta Director, US Particle Accelerator School Dept. of Physics, MIT Economics Faculty, University of Ljubljana US Particle Accelerator School ~ 650 cyclotrons operating round the world Radioisotope production >$600M annually Proton beam radiation therapy ~30 machines Nuclear physics research Nuclear structure, unstable isotopes,etc High-energy physics research? DAEδALUS Cyclotrons are big business US Particle Accelerator School Cyclotrons start with the ion linac (Wiederoe) Vrf Vrf Phase shift between tubes is 180o As the ions increase their velocity, drift tubes must get longer 1 v 1 "c 1 Ldrift = = = "# rf 2 f rf 2 f rf 2 Etot = Ngap•Vrf ==> High energy implies large size US Particle Accelerator School ! To make it smaller, Let’s curl up the Wiederoe linac… Bend the drift tubes Connect equipotentials Eliminate excess Cu Supply magnetic field to bend beam 1 2# mc $ 2# mc " rev = = % = const. frf eZion B eZion B Orbits are isochronous, independent of energy ! US Particle Accelerator School … and we have Lawrence’s* cyclotron The electrodes are excited at a fixed frequency (rf-voltage source) Particles remain in resonance throughout acceleration A new bunch can be accelerated on every rf-voltage peak: ===> “continuous-wave (cw) operation” Lawrence, E.O. and Sloan, D.: Proc. Nat. Ac. Sc., 17, 64 (1931) Lawrence, E.O. & Livingstone M.S.: Phys. Rev 37, 1707 (1931). * The first cyclotron patent (German) was filed in 1929 by Leó Szilard but never published in a journal US Particle Accelerator School Synchronism only requires that τrev = N/frf “Isochronous” particles take the same revolution time for each turn.
    [Show full text]
  • Accelerator Physics Third Edition
    Preface Accelerator science took off in the 20th century. Accelerator scientists invent many in- novative technologies to produce and manipulate high energy and high quality beams that are instrumental to progresses in natural sciences. Many kinds of accelerators serve the need of research in natural and biomedical sciences, and the demand of applications in industry. In the 21st century, accelerators will become even more important in applications that include industrial processing and imaging, biomedical research, nuclear medicine, medical imaging, cancer therapy, energy research, etc. Accelerator research aims to produce beams in high power, high energy, and high brilliance frontiers. These beams addresses the needs of fundamental science research in particle and nuclear physics, condensed matter and biomedical sciences. High power beams may ignite many applications in industrial processing, energy production, and national security. Accelerator Physics studies the interaction between the charged particles and elec- tromagnetic field. Research topics in accelerator science include generation of elec- tromagnetic fields, material science, plasma, ion source, secondary beam production, nonlinear dynamics, collective instabilities, beam cooling, beam instrumentation, de- tection and analysis, beam manipulation, etc. The textbook is intended for graduate students who have completed their graduate core-courses including classical mechanics, electrodynamics, quantum mechanics, and statistical mechanics. I have tried to emphasize the fundamental physics behind each innovative idea with least amount of mathematical complication. The textbook may also be used by advanced undergraduate seniors who have completed courses on classical mechanics and electromagnetism. For beginners in accelerator physics, one begins with Secs. 2.I–2.IV in Chapter 2, and follows by Secs.
    [Show full text]
  • Accelerator Physics Alid Engineering 3Rd Printing
    Handbook of Accelerator Physics alid Engineering 3rd Printing edited by Alexander Wu Chao Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Maury Tigner Carneil University World Scientific lbh NEW JERSEY • LONDON • SINGAPORE • BEIJING • SHANGHAI • HONG KONG • TAIPEI • CHENNAI Table of Contents Preface 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 HOW TO USE THIS BOOK 1 1.2 NOMENCLATURE 1 1.3 FUNDAMENTAL CONSTANTS 3 1.4 UNITS AND CONVERSIONS 4 1.4.1 Units A. W. Chao 4 1.4.2 Conversions M. Tigner 4 1.5 FUNDAMENTAL FORMULAE A. W. Chao 5 1.5.1 Special Functions 5 1.5.2 Curvilinear Coordinate Systems 6 1.5.3 Electromagnetism 6 1.5.4 Kinematical Relations 7 1.5.5 Vector Analysis 8 1.5.6 Relativity 8 1.6 GLOSSARY OF ACCELERATOR TYPES 8 1.6.1 Antiproton Sources J. Peoples, J.P. Marriner 8 1.6.2 Betatron M. Tigner 10 1.6.3 Colliders J. Rees 11 1.6.4 Cyclotron H. Blosser 13 1.6.5 Electrostatic Accelerator J. Ferry 16 1.6.6 FFAG Accelerators M.K. Craddock 18 1.6.7 Free-Electron Lasers C. Pellegrini 21 1.6.8 High Voltage Electrodynamic Accelerators M. Cleland 25 1.6.9 Induction Linacs R. Bangerter 28 1.6.10 Industrial Applications of Electrostatic Accelerators G. Norton, J.L. Duggan 30 1.6.11 Linear Accelerators for Electron G.A. Loew 31 1.6.12 Linear Accelerators for Protons S. Henderson, A. Aleksandrov 34 1.6.13 Livingston Chart J. Rees 38 1.6.14 Medical Applications of Accelerators J. Alonso 38 1.6.14.1 Radiation therapy 38 1.6.14.2 Radioisotopes 40 1.6.15 Microtron P.H.
    [Show full text]
  • Accelerator Physics for Health Physicist by D. Cossairt
    Accelerator Physics for Health Physicists J. Donald Cossairt Ph.D., C.H.P. Applied Scientist III Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory 1 Introduction • Goal is to improve knowledge and appreciation of the art of particle accelerator physics • Accelerator health physicists should understand how the machines work. • Accelerators have unique operational characteristics of importance to radiation protection. – For their own understanding – To promote communication with accelerator physicists, operators, and experimenters • This course will not make you an accelerator PHYSICIST! – Limitations of both time and level prescript that. – For those who want to learn more, academic courses and the U. S. Particle Accelerator School provide much comprehensive opportunities. • Much of the material is found in several of the references. – Particularly clear or unique descriptions are cited among these. 2 A word about notation • Vector notation will be used extensively. – Vectors are printed in italic boldface (e.g., E) – Their corresponding magnitudes are shown in italics (e.g., E). • Variable names generally will follow the published literature. • Consistency has not been achieved. – This author cannot fix that by himself! – Chose to remain close to the literature – Watch the context! 3 Summary of relativistic relationships including Maxwell’s equations • Special theory of relativity is important. • Accelerators work because of Maxwell’s equations. •Therest energy of a particle Wo is connected to its rest mass mo by the speed of light c: 2 Wmcoo= (1) • Total energy W of a particle moving with velocity v is 2 22mco W 1 Wmc== =γ mco γ == , (2) 2 2 1− β , with Wo 1− β β = v/c, m is the relativistic mass, and γ is the relativistic parameter.
    [Show full text]
  • Sarah M. Cousineau
    Sarah M. Cousineau Section Head: Accelerator Science and Technology, Spallation Neutron Source Spallation Neutron Source Phone: +1 865 406 0294 PO Box 2008, MS 6461 [email protected] Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6461 Current Job Responsibilities: • Lead the Accelerator Science and Technology group at the Spallation Neutron Source (SNS) accelerator: § Lead the production, measurement, understanding and analysis of the SNS 1.4 MW H- linac and ring proton beams § Define and oversee a robust R&D program targeted at high intensity, high power beams § Define and oversee an effective mechanical engineering design program that supports both beam operations and accelerator R&D § Manage the beam study program aimed at identifying, understanding, and mitigating accelerator performance limitations § Guide and facilitate strategic plans for accelerator performance improvements, and software tools for efficient modeling and analysis of the beam § Manage the section budget and provide professional development opportunities for staff § Promote a strong culture of safety in all activities § Participate in outreach and professional community service roles Education: • 2003 Ph.D. (Accelerator Physics), Indiana University • 2000 M.S. (Accelerator Physics), Indiana University • 1998 B.S. (Physics, summa cum laude), University of North Dakota Research Interests: • Collective effects in high intensity beams, space charge and instabilities • Novel injection methods for proton drivers • Laser and ion beam interactions • Code development and simulation of high intensity beams • Novel beam diagnostics and measurement techniques • High power beam collimation • High current and duty factor H- ion sources Professional Experience: 07/2020 – present Section Head, Accelerator Science and Technology 01/2016 – 07/2020 Group Leader, Beam Science and Technology group, Spallation Neutron Source 02/2012 – 07/2020 Joint Faculty Professor, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee 1 Sarah M.
    [Show full text]
  • Accelerator Physics of Colliders
    1 31. Accelerator Physics of Colliders 31. Accelerator Physics of Colliders Revised August 2019 by M.J. Syphers (Northern Illinois U.; FNAL) and F. Zimmermann (CERN). This article provides background for the High-Energy Collider Parameter Tables that follow and some additional information. 31.1 Luminosity The number of events, Nexp, is the product of the cross section of interest, σexp, and the time integral over the instantaneous luminosity, L: Z Nexp = σexp × L(t)dt. (31.1) Today’s colliders all employ bunched beams. If two bunches containing n1 and n2 particles collide head-on with average collision frequency fcoll, a basic expression for the luminosity is n1n2 L = fcoll ∗ ∗ F (31.2) 4πσxσy ∗ ∗ where σx and σy characterize the rms transverse beam sizes in the horizontal (bend) and vertical directions at the interaction point, and F is a factor of order 1, that takes into account geometric effects such as a crossing angle and finite bunch length, and dynamic effects, such as the mutual focusing of the two beam during the collision. For a circular collider, fcoll equals the number of bunches per beam times the revolution frequency. In 31.2, it is assumed that the bunches are identical in transverse profile, that the profiles are Gaussian and independent of position along the bunch, and the particle distributions are not altered during bunch crossing. Nonzero beam crossing angles θc in the horizontal plane and long bunches (rms bunch length σz) will reduce the luminosity, 2 1/2 ∗ e.g., by a factor F ≈ 1/(1 + φ ) , where the parameter φ ≡ θcσz/(2σx) is known as the Piwinski angle.
    [Show full text]
  • BNL Bulletin
    the Vol. 61B - No. 17 ulletin May 18, 2007 Distinguished Scientist Emeritus Ernest Courant All Are Welcome to Attend Honored by University of Rochester CFN Ribbon Cutting Ceremony he University of Rochester, where BNL’s Dis- 5/21, 11 a.m. Ttinguished Scientist Emeritus Ernest Courant earned his Ph.D. in 1943, will honor him with the Rochester Distinguished Scholar Medal at this year’s A Highlight of the 2007 Joint NSLS/CFN commencement ceremony, to be held tomorrow, May Users’ Meeting, 5/21-23 19. The University issued the following press release citing Courant and his work: All scientists who work in particle physics today owe a debt to Ernest Courant. His groundbreaking D0180602 scholarship has changed the way we think about and understand the structure of the universe. One of the trio of researchers who originated D0230500 the idea of “strong focusing” accelerators, Pro- fessor Courant is one of the founding fathers of modern high-energy particle physics. Thanks to Professor Courant’s breakthrough in developing Roger Stoutenburgh the first high-energy, strong focusing accelera- he 2007 Joint National Synchrotron Light Source (NSLS) tor—and the particle accelerators that have fol- and Center for Functional Nanomaterials (CFN) Users’ Roger Stoutenburgh T lowed since—physicists have been able to peek Meeting will be held at Berkner Hall from Monday, May 21 inside individual atoms to understand the funda- At BNL, Courant joined the Proton Synchrotron Di- through Wednesday, May 23. The meeting is a forum for re- mental structure of matter, the forces holding it vision as an associate scientist in June 1948.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History and Review of Accelerators
    A BRIEF HISTORY AND REVIEW OF ACCELERATORS P.J. Bryant CERN, Geneva, Switzerland ABSTRACT The history of accelerators is traced from three separate roots, through a rapid development to the present day. The well-known Livingston chart is used to illustrate how spectacular this development has been with, on average, an increase of one and a half orders of magnitude in energy per decade, since the early thirties. Several present-day accelerators are reviewed along with plans and hopes for the future. 1 . INTRODUCTION High-energy physics research has always been the driving force behind the development of particle accelerators. They started life in physics research laboratories in glass envelopes sealed with varnish and putty with shining electrodes and frequent discharges, but they have long since outgrown this environment to become large-scale facilities offering services to large communities. Although the particle physics community is still the main group, they have been joined by others of whom the synchrotron light users are the largest and fastest growing. There is also an increasing interest in radiation therapy in the medical world and industry has been a long-time user of ion implantation and many other applications. Consequently accelerators now constitute a field of activity in their own right with professional physicists and engineers dedicated to their study, construction and operation. This paper will describe the early history of accelerators, review the important milestones in their development up to the present day and take a preview of future plans and hopes. 2 . HISTORICAL ROOTS The early history of accelerators can be traced from three separate roots.
    [Show full text]
  • Relativity, EM Forces - Historical Introduction
    Accelerator Physics Alex Bogacz (Jefferson Lab) / [email protected] Geoff Krafft (Jefferson Lab/ODU) / [email protected] Timofey Zolkin (U. Chicago/Fermilab) / [email protected] Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Lecture 1Accelerator− Relativity, Physics EM Forces, Intro Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy USPAS, Fort Collins, CO, June 10-21, 2013 1 Introductions and Outline Syllabus Week 1 Week 2 Introduction Course logistics, Homework, Exam: http://casa/publications/USPAS_Summer_2013.shtml Relativistic mechanics review Relativistic E&M review, Cyclotrons Survey of accelerators and accelerator concepts Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Lecture 1Accelerator− Relativity, Physics EM Forces, Intro Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy 2 Syllabus – week 1 Mon 10 June 0900-1200 Lecture 1 ‘Relativity, EM Forces - Historical Introduction Mon 10 June 1330-1630 Lecture 2 ‘Weak focusing and Transverse Stability’ Tue 11 June 0900-1200 Lecture 3 ‘Linear Optics’ Tue 11 June 1330-1630 Lecture 4 ‘Phase Stability, Synchrotron Motion’ Wed 12 June 0900-1200 Lecture 5 ‘Magnetic Multipoles, Magnet Design’ Wed 12 June 1330-1630 Lecture 6 ‘Particle Acceleration’ Thu 13 June 0900-1200 Lecture 7 ‘Coupled Betatron Motion I’ Thu 13 June 1330-1630 Lecture 8 ‘Synchrotron Radiation’ Fri 14 June 0900-1200 Lecture 9 ‘Coupled Betatron Motion II’ Fri 14 June 1330-1530 Lecture 10 ‘Radiation Distributions’ Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Lecture 1Accelerator− Relativity, Physics EM Forces, Intro Operated
    [Show full text]