Among the Arboreal: Herman Van Swanevelt, Trees, and the Early Modern Landscape

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Among the Arboreal: Herman Van Swanevelt, Trees, and the Early Modern Landscape Among The Arboreal: Herman Van Swanevelt, Trees, and the Early Modern Landscape Item Type text; Electronic Thesis Authors Marquis, Jonathan Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction, presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 24/09/2021 07:09:11 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/632567 AMONG THE ARBOREAL: HERMAN VAN SWANEVELT, TREES, AND THE EARLY MODERN LANDSCAPE by Jonathan Marquis ____________________________ Copyright © Jonathan Marquis 2019 A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF ART HISTORY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2019 1 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures …………………………………………………...……. 4 Abstract ……………………………………………………………….. 6 Introduction …………………………………………………………… 7 Encounters beneath the branches of art history……………………….. 14 Biography and literature review ……………………………………….19 Seeing landscape: a stroll in the forest of art history…………………. 33 Drawing Swanevelt’s forest ………………………………………….. 46 Extending the forest ………………………………………………….. 53 Conclusion …………………………………………………………… 64 Figures ……………………………………………………………….. 70 Notes …………………………………………………………………. 81 Bibliography …………………………………………………………. 92 3 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 – Herman van Swanevelt, View of the Palatine in Rome, c. 1650, etching, 7.3 x 11.1 inches, University of Arizona Museum of Art, Tucson. Figure 2 – Herman van Swanevelt, Landscape with Ruins and Woman with a Parasol, c. 1650, etching, 7.2 x 10.9 inches, University of Arizona Museum of Art, Tucson. Figure 3 – Herman van Swanevelt, Drawing of the Palatine, ink on paper. The Hague. Figure 4 – Herman van Swanevelt, Nature Study (possibly Palatine Ruins), National Gallery, Oslo. Figure 5 – Claude Lorrain, Ruins of the Palatine, Landscape Sketch. c. 1640. Figure 6 – Albrecht Dürer, Fir, c. 1495, watercolor and gouache on paper, 29.5x19.6 cm. British Museum, London Figure 7 – Leonardo Da Vinci Tree Study, c. 1498, red chalk on paper, 19.1x15.3 cm, Royal Library, Windsor Castle. Figure 8 – Leonardo da Vinci, Tree Drawings from da Vinci’s Notebooks. Figure 9 – Matthus Merian, Panoramic Map of Rome (Detail), c 1641. Figure 10 – Herman van Swanevelt The Arch of Constantine, Oil on canvas, 89.5x116.2 cm, 1645, Dulwich Picture Gallery, London. Figure 11 – Herman van Swanevelt, A Roman View of the Ruins of the Temple of Venus and Rome with the Colosseum and the Arch of Constantine, 1634, oil on canvas, 52”x67”, The National Museum of Western Art, Tokyo. Figure 12 – Claude Lorrain, A Study of an Oak Tree, c. 1638, Chalk, ink, 330 x224 mm. The British Museum, London. Figure 13 – Herman van Swanevelt, Martyrdom of a Dominican (St. Peter?), Fresco, Sacristy, S. Maria Sopra Minerva, Rome. Figure 14 – Herman van Swanevelt, Jacob travels into Egypt, c. 1635 Fresco, Sala di Giuseppe, Palazzo Pamphilj, Rome. Figure 15 – Herman van Swanevelt, Jacob Hiding the Branches and The Flight of Jacob, Fresco, Palazzo Mancini, Rome Figure 16 – Charles Estienne, De dissection partium corporis humani, 1545. Figure 17 – Charles Estienne, De dissection partium corporis humani, 1545. 4 Figure 18 – Giustiniani medicine chest, ca. 1560-70 or early seventeenth century. The Science Museum, London. Figure 19 – Albrecht Altdorfer, Landscape with Castle or Danube Landscape, c. 1522-25, oil on parchment mounted to panel, 30.5 x22.2 cm, Alte Pinakothek, Munich. Figure 20 – Albrecht Altdorfer, Landscape with Woodcutter, c. 1522, watercolor and gouache on paper, 20.1 x 13.6 cm, Kupferstichkabinett, Berlin. Figure 21 – Paul Bril, Fantastic Landscape¸ 1598, oil on copper, 21.30 x 29.20 cm, National Gallery of Scotland, Edinburgh. Figure 22 – Herman van Swanevelt, Performance of Two Singers in a Village, 24 October 1623, Ink on paper, 173 x 247 mm, Herzog Anton Ulrich-Museum, Braunschweig. Figure 23 – Herman van Swanevelt, View of the Palatine in Rome. University of Arizona Museum of Art, Tucson. (Detail). Figure 24 – Herman van Swanevelt, View of the Palatine in Rome. University of Arizona Museum of Art, Tucson. (Detail). Figure 25 – Herman van Swanevelt, View of the Palatine in Rome. University of Arizona Museum of Art, Tucson. (Detail). Figure 26 – Herman van Swanevelt, View of the Palatine in Rome. University of Arizona Museum of Art, Tucson. (Detail). Figure 27 – Herman van Swanevelt, View of the Palatine in Rome. University of Arizona Museum of Art, Tucson. (Details). Figure 28 – Herman van Swanevelt, View of the Palatine in Rome. University of Arizona Museum of Art, Tucson. (Detail of zig zag path of observation). 5 ABSTRACT The lifeworlds of humans and trees entangle in an ecology of relations to give shape to early seventeenth-century developments in landscape painting. Yet, trees are given little academic consideration, in favor of broad, ahistorical frameworks like the pastoral and sublime, even though the gnarled forms of trees dominate the earliest instances of the landscape genre. This thesis considers an arboreal-turn toward art history and examines early modern trees from a post-human, new materialism, and somatic perspective to shed light as to why trees are so profuse at a formative moment in the development of autonomous landscape pictures. Trees are dynamic sites of encounter and exchange in the landscape, whose meaning takes form through a range of disciplines and bodily activities that include labor, leisure, walking, contemplation and drawing. According to Tim Ingold, it is only after this mutually generative exchange does one get to thinking about the landscape. The landscape, it must be remembered, is inhabited before it is painted, and inhabitation, at its root, is a sensorial and somatic process unfolding within a landscape. Nicknamed the “Hermit” for his predilection to solitary wanderings near Rome, Herman van Swanevelt (1604-1655) is remembered for being one of the first to render specific atmospheric conditions of light, free of the religious subject matter that long defined the genre. However, trees dominate Swanevelt’s entire oeuvre. A close examination of Swanevelt’s etching View of the Palatine in Rome reveals the therapeutic efficacy of early modern arboreal landscapes, enacted through the activities of the print’s figures. 6 Among the Arboreal: Herman van Swanevelt, Trees, and the Early Modern Landscape by Jonathan Marquis Introduction The Landscape is not a totality that you or anyone else can look at, it is rather the world in which we stand in taking up a point of view in our surroundings. And it is within the context of this attentive involvement in the landscape that the human imagination gets to work in fashioning ideas about it. For the landscape, to borrow a phrase from Merleau-Ponty, is not so much the object as ‘the homeland’ of our thoughts. – Tim Ingold, The Perception of the Environment Late afternoon light falls on a hill in Rome. The sun rakes a gnarled mass of trees and illuminates the walls of the ancient ruins that inhabit the hillside. The trees grow wildly and nearly overwhelm the ruins accelerating their slow journey to the ground. The processes of growth and ruination intertwine, and that which animates leaf, limb, and root transforms the ruins from a mere heap of rubble into a pleasing landscape to walk among the arboreal.1 The atmosphere is pleasant, and people are out. Small groups and a few solo wanderers gather up the day’s last light as they meander amongst the trees and remnants of antiquity. A pair of men casually relax in the shade of a large, twisted oak, pointing toward the complex of ruins before them. Two men of noble stature stroll down the dirt road with the warm sun on 7 their back – their long shadows cast before them. One of them gestures to the small path that diverges from the road and leads to the slopes harboring the ruins. Further ahead a solitary woman with a large bushel on her head moves slowly toward a gate. The wooden door propped open grants access to the walled enclosure. A large dead snag reaches over the entry portal, signaling the temporal threshold the figures must cross. Several people already amble about the trees and ruins. A small figure awash in the warm light of the sun climbs a steep incline. Two figures on the summit breathe in the sky and point beyond the cypress trees that frame a view of the ancient city beyond. The intense afternoon light nearly engulfs the identity of a lone, ambling figure on the edge of a great arch above the temporal chasm of trees and ancient architecture. Another figure in the shadow of an old guard tower looks on, lost in contemplation, and appears to have already succumbed to the ancient depths. And so is described the scene of the seventeenth-century etching, View of the Palatine in Rome by Herman van Swanevelt (Fig. 1). For whether in print or in life, here on this sun- drenched hillside in the Eternal City, the terrain is to be traversed and the trees and ruins meant to be experienced and contemplated, the warmth of the sun felt in the flesh; the fresh air inhaled deeply. The hillside and pathways strengthen one’s body and offer renewal. The verdant plants extend their vigor upon the eyes, and the forces that give life to the trees and bring the ruins toward the earth are beheld. For walking among the robust growth of trees and the silent, ancient memories of ruins do the early modern artists and patron encounter the ennobling, mental health benefits and therapeutic properties of the landscape. However, the early modern environment was not all sunshine and roses as suggested by the account of the print. For fear that France would quite literally die for lack of wood, the French king ordained the French Forest Ordinance of 1669.2 The ordinance prevented wood cutting, collection and 8 livestock foraging to preserve the forests of the king.
Recommended publications
  • Eighteenth-Century English and French Landscape Painting
    University of Louisville ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository Electronic Theses and Dissertations 12-2018 Common ground, diverging paths: eighteenth-century English and French landscape painting. Jessica Robins Schumacher University of Louisville Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.louisville.edu/etd Part of the Other History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons Recommended Citation Schumacher, Jessica Robins, "Common ground, diverging paths: eighteenth-century English and French landscape painting." (2018). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 3111. https://doi.org/10.18297/etd/3111 This Master's Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. This title appears here courtesy of the author, who has retained all other copyrights. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COMMON GROUND, DIVERGING PATHS: EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY ENGLISH AND FRENCH LANDSCAPE PAINTING By Jessica Robins Schumacher B.A. cum laude, Vanderbilt University, 1977 J.D magna cum laude, Brandeis School of Law, University of Louisville, 1986 A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of the University of Louisville in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Art (C) and Art History Hite Art Department University of Louisville Louisville, Kentucky December 2018 Copyright 2018 by Jessica Robins Schumacher All rights reserved COMMON GROUND, DIVERGENT PATHS: EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY ENGLISH AND FRENCH LANDSCAPE PAINTING By Jessica Robins Schumacher B.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Key to the People and Art in Samuel F. B. Morse's Gallery of the Louvre
    15 21 26 2 13 4 8 32 35 22 5 16 27 14 33 1 9 6 23 17 28 34 3 36 7 10 24 18 29 39 C 19 31 11 12 G 20 25 30 38 37 40 D A F E H B Key to the People and Art in Samuel F. B. Morse’s Gallery of the Louvre In an effort to educate his American audience, Samuel Morse published Descriptive Catalogue of the Pictures. Thirty-seven in Number, from the Most Celebrated Masters, Copied into the “Gallery of the Louvre” (New York, 1833). The updated version of Morse’s key to the pictures presented here reflects current scholarship. Although Morse never identified the people represented in his painting, this key includes the possible identities of some of them. Exiting the gallery are a woman and little girl dressed in provincial costumes, suggesting the broad appeal of the Louvre and the educational benefits it afforded. PEOPLE 19. Paolo Caliari, known as Veronese (1528–1588, Italian), Christ Carrying A. Samuel F. B. Morse the Cross B. Susan Walker Morse, daughter of Morse 20. Leonardo da Vinci (1452–1519, Italian), Mona Lisa C. James Fenimore Cooper, author and friend of Morse 21. Antonio Allegri, known as Correggio (c. 1489?–1534, Italian), Mystic D. Susan DeLancy Fenimore Cooper Marriage of St. Catherine of Alexandria E. Susan Fenimore Cooper, daughter of James and Susan DeLancy 22. Peter Paul Rubens (1577–1640, Flemish), Lot and His Family Fleeing Fenimore Cooper Sodom F. Richard W. Habersham, artist and Morse’s roommate in Paris 23.
    [Show full text]
  • Unequal Lovers: a Study of Unequal Couples in Northern Art
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Publications and Creative Activity, School of Art, Art History and Design Art, Art History and Design, School of 1978 Unequal Lovers: A Study of Unequal Couples in Northern Art Alison G. Stewart University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/artfacpub Part of the History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons Stewart, Alison G., "Unequal Lovers: A Study of Unequal Couples in Northern Art" (1978). Faculty Publications and Creative Activity, School of Art, Art History and Design. 19. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/artfacpub/19 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Art, Art History and Design, School of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications and Creative Activity, School of Art, Art History and Design by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Unequal Lovers Unequal Lovers A Study of Unequal Couples in Northern Art A1ison G. Stewart ABARIS BOOKS- NEW YORK Copyright 1977 by Walter L. Strauss International Standard Book Number 0-913870-44-7 Library of Congress Card Number 77-086221 First published 1978 by Abaris Books, Inc. 24 West 40th Street, New York, New York 10018 Printed in the United States of America This book is sold subject to the condition that no portion shall be reproduced in any form or by any means, and that it shall not, by way of trade, be lent, resold, hired out, or otherwise disposed of without the publisher's consent, in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is published.
    [Show full text]
  • November 2012 Newsletter
    historians of netherlandish art NEWSLETTER AND REVIEW OF BOOKS Dedicated to the Study of Netherlandish, German and Franco-Flemish Art and Architecture, 1350-1750 Vol. 29, No. 2 November 2012 Jan and/or Hubert van Eyck, The Three Marys at the Tomb, c. 1425-1435. Oil on panel. Museum Boijmans Van Beuningen, Rotterdam. In the exhibition “De weg naar Van Eyck,” Museum Boijmans Van Beuningen, October 13, 2012 – February 10, 2013. HNA Newsletter, Vol. 23, No. 2, November 2006 1 historians of netherlandish art 23 S. Adelaide Avenue, Highland Park, NJ 08904 Telephone: (732) 937-8394 E-Mail: [email protected] www.hnanews.org Historians of Netherlandish Art Offi cers President - Stephanie Dickey (2009–2013) Bader Chair in Northern Baroque Art Queen’s University Kingston ON K7L 3N6 Canada Vice-President - Amy Golahny (2009–2013) Lycoming College Williamsport, PA 17701 Treasurer - Rebecca Brienen University of Miami Art & Art History Department PO Box 248106 Coral Gables FL 33124-2618 European Treasurer and Liaison - Fiona Healy Seminarstrasse 7 D-55127 Mainz Germany Contents Board Members President's Message .............................................................. 1 Paul Crenshaw (2012-2016) HNA News ............................................................................1 Wayne Franits (2009-2013) Personalia ............................................................................... 2 Martha Hollander (2012-2016) Exhibitions ............................................................................ 3 Henry Luttikhuizen (2009 and 2010-2014)
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Italianate Landscape Painters
    Northern Italianate Landscape Painters ... Northern artists had long spent time in Italy – hence the work of Pieter de Kempeneer (1503-1580) (Room 9) and Frans Floris (1516-1570) in the sixteenth century, who drew their inspiration from the Antique and contemporary masters. Landscape painters Paul Bril (1554-1626) and Adam Elsheimer (1574/78-1610/20) (Room 10), settled there from the end of the sixteenth century and were to influence the Italian school profoundly. However, from around 1620, the Northern Diaspora gave rise to a novel way of representing the towns and countryside of Italy. Cornelis van Poelenburgh (1595/96-1667) went to Rome in 1617 and around 1623 was among the founder members of the Bentvueghels “birds of a feather”, an association of mutual support for Northern artists, goldsmiths and “art lovers” – not only Flemish and Dutch, but Room also Germans and even a few French. He painted shepherds in the ruins and plains of Latium where the harsh light creates strong shadows. Around 1625, the Dutch painter Pieter van Berchem Laer (1599-1642 ?), nicknamed Il Bamboccio, invented the bambocciate, a different take on Caravaggesque scenes of realism showing moments of contemporary Italian low-life in ... the open air and bringing a modern feel to the subject matter. The bambocciate met with considerable success. Flemish and From these two trends – pastoral landscapes suffused with light, and racy at times Dutch Painting vulgar scenes of daily life – was to develop a whole chapter in European painting, dominated by Northern artists but also marked by Italians such as Michelangelo Cerquozzi (1602-1660) and French painters like Sébastien Bourdon (1616-1671).
    [Show full text]
  • Full Press Release
    Press Contacts Michelle Perlin 212.590.0311, [email protected] f Patrick Milliman 212.590.0310, [email protected] MASTER DRAWINGS FROM SEVENTEENTH-CENTURY FRANCE FEATURED IN NEW EXHIBITION AT THE MORGAN Poussin, Claude, and French Drawing in the Classical Age June 16 through October 15, 2017 New York, NY, May, 22, 2017 — The French refer to the seventeenth century as the Grand Siècle, or the Great Century. Under the rule of Louis XIII and Louis XIV, the period saw a dramatic increase in French political and military power, the maturation of French courtly life at Versailles, and an unparalleled flourishing of the arts. Poussin, Claude, and French Drawing in the Classical Age, a new exhibition opening at the Morgan Library & Museum on June 16, explores the work of some of the most celebrated artists of the time. More than fifty drawings largely from the Morgan’s collections—including works by Claude Lorrain, Nicolas Poussin, Jacques Callot, and Charles Le Brun—will be on view. Together they demonstrate the era’s distinctive approach to composition and subject matter, informed by principles of rationalism, respect for the art of classical antiquity, and by a belief in a natural world governed by divine order. The exhibition runs through October 15. Nicolas Poussin (1594–1665), Death of Hippolytus, 1645, pen and brown ink and wash over black chalk. The Morgan Library & Museum; Purchased by Pierpont Morgan in 1909, I, 267. “The Grand Siècle saw artistic development unlike any before it in France,” said Colin B. Bailey, director of the Morgan Library & Museum. “The visual arts, literature, music, drama, and architecture all prospered.
    [Show full text]
  • The Codex Corazza and Zaccolini's Treatises in the Project of Cassiano Dal Pozzo for the Spreading of Leonardo's Works
    The Codex Corazza and Zaccolini’s Treatises 19 Chapter 2 The Codex Corazza and Zaccolini’s Treatises in the Project of Cassiano dal Pozzo for the Spreading of Leonardo’s Works Alfredo Buccaro Università degli Studi di Napoli “Federico II,” Dipartimento di Architettura Introduction This essay draws on my recent book—written with the support of Carlo Pe- dretti and in the wake of his studies—about the critical edition and reproduc- tion of the Codex Corazza, the apograph by Leonardo kept in the National Library of Naples, as well as on my current studies on the role of the apographs of Zaccolini’s treatises at the Laurentiana Library in Florence within the gen- eral context of the spread of Leonardo’s thinking in Southern Italy.1 Here I aim to describe the relevance of that work and of the ongoing study supported by our illustrious scholar and friend Pedretti. The two mentioned manuscripts have the same origin: they both are part of the family of apo- graphs drawn up under a massive initiative promoted by Cassiano dal Pozzo in 1640 for Cardinal Francesco Barberini, which aimed at the edition of an anthol- ogy of the Ambrosian Leonardo manuscripts. The Codex Corazza had to repre- sent the final draft of this “anthology,” which was ready to print, but never published. It should have included the edition of Leonardo’s texts forming the Treatise on Painting—later published in Paris in 1651—and the apographs kept in the Laurentiana Library: these last ones, still unpublished although partially studied, come from lost originals dating back to 1618–1622, drawn by the paint- er and perspectivist-architect Matteo Zaccolini, a lay brother of the Theatine order, and containing some texts from Leonardo’s writings on perspective and theory of shadows and colors.
    [Show full text]
  • Studio Notes: Why Classical and Contemporary Paintings Look So Different?
    Why Classical and Contemporary Paintings Look So Different? Photos courtesy of The Bridgeman Art Library In November, John E. Buchanan, Jr., executive director of the Portland (OR) Art Museum, invited Robert Gamblin to give a public lecture on WHY classical paintings look different from Impressionist paintings. This is the text of his lecture plus illustrations that highlight a wonderful group of French Baroque paintings on exhibit - "The Triumph of French Painting" - at the Portland Art Museum during the Fall 2003. Why do Classical and Modern Paintings look different? To answer that question, I would like to discuss with you ● the difference between indirect and direct painting techniques ● the evolution of artists' colors ● the role of the artist as creator of our cultural memory. Claude Lorrain and Claude Monet offer good examples of the two basic styles of painting: indirect and direct painting. Structure of the painting, direct vs. indirect The classical approach to painting is called indirect because what you see is a combination of three or more layers of the painting. The viewer sees all three layers visible simultaneously in different parts of the painting. The artist carefully plans the layering to create specific visual effects. Look at the diagram I drew to help it make sense. Here we are looking at the side view of a painting. ● The canvas is at the bottom ● The white ground on top of the canvas ● The actual paint layers on the ground. The first layer, called the imprimatura, is applied over the image drawn on to the ground. A thin "wash" of oil color establishes the middle tone of the painting.
    [Show full text]
  • Dutch and Flemish Art in Russia
    Dutch & Flemish art in Russia Dutch and Flemish art in Russia CODART & Foundation for Cultural Inventory (Stichting Cultuur Inventarisatie) Amsterdam Editors: LIA GORTER, Foundation for Cultural Inventory GARY SCHWARTZ, CODART BERNARD VERMET, Foundation for Cultural Inventory Editorial organization: MARIJCKE VAN DONGEN-MATHLENER, Foundation for Cultural Inventory WIETSKE DONKERSLOOT, CODART English-language editing: JENNIFER KILIAN KATHY KIST This publication proceeds from the CODART TWEE congress in Amsterdam, 14-16 March 1999, organized by CODART, the international council for curators of Dutch and Flemish art, in cooperation with the Foundation for Cultural Inventory (Stichting Cultuur Inventarisatie). The contents of this volume are available for quotation for appropriate purposes, with acknowledgment of author and source. © 2005 CODART & Foundation for Cultural Inventory Contents 7 Introduction EGBERT HAVERKAMP-BEGEMANN 10 Late 19th-century private collections in Moscow and their fate between 1918 and 1924 MARINA SENENKO 42 Prince Paul Viazemsky and his Gothic Hall XENIA EGOROVA 56 Dutch and Flemish old master drawings in the Hermitage: a brief history of the collection ALEXEI LARIONOV 82 The perception of Rembrandt and his work in Russia IRINA SOKOLOVA 112 Dutch and Flemish paintings in Russian provincial museums: history and highlights VADIM SADKOV 120 Russian collections of Dutch and Flemish art in art history in the west RUDI EKKART 128 Epilogue 129 Bibliography of Russian collection catalogues of Dutch and Flemish art MARIJCKE VAN DONGEN-MATHLENER & BERNARD VERMET Introduction EGBERT HAVERKAMP-BEGEMANN CODART brings together museum curators from different institutions with different experiences and different interests. The organisation aims to foster discussions and an exchange of information and ideas, so that professional colleagues have an opportunity to learn from each other, an opportunity they often lack.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Landscape in Venetian Painting, 1475-1525
    THE EVOLUTION OF LANDSCAPE IN VENETIAN PAINTING, 1475-1525 by James Reynolds Jewitt BA in Art History, Hartwick College, 2006 BA in English, Hartwick College, 2006 MA, University of Pittsburgh, 2009 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2014 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH KENNETH P. DIETRICH SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES This dissertation was presented by James Reynolds Jewitt It was defended on April 7, 2014 and approved by C. Drew Armstrong, Associate Professor, History of Art and Architecture Kirk Savage, Professor, History of Art and Architecture Jennifer Waldron, Associate Professor, Department of English Dissertation Advisor: Ann Sutherland Harris, Professor Emerita, History of Art and Architecture ii Copyright © by James Reynolds Jewitt 2014 iii THE EVOLUTION OF LANDSCAPE IN VENETIAN PAINTING, 1475-1525 James R. Jewitt, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2014 Landscape painting assumed a new prominence in Venetian painting between the late fifteenth to early sixteenth century: this study aims to understand why and how this happened. It begins by redefining the conception of landscape in Renaissance Italy and then examines several ambitious easel paintings produced by major Venetian painters, beginning with Giovanni Bellini’s (c.1431- 36-1516) St. Francis in the Desert (c.1475), that give landscape a far more significant role than previously seen in comparable commissions by their peers, or even in their own work. After an introductory chapter reconsidering all previous hypotheses regarding Venetian painters’ reputations as accomplished landscape painters, it is divided into four chronologically arranged case study chapters.
    [Show full text]
  • A Catalogue of the Paintings at Doughty House, Richmond, & Elsewhere in the Collection of Sir Frederick Cook, Bt., Visconde
    A CATALOGUE OF THE PAINTINGS IN THE COLLECTION of SIR FREDERICK COOK, BT. A CATALOGUE OF THE PAINTINGS AT DOUGHTY HOUSE RICHMOND AND ELSEWHERE IN THE COLLECTION OF SIR FREDERICK COOK BT VISCONDE DE MONSERRATE Edited by HERBERT COOK, M.A., F.S.A. VOLUME I ITALIAN SCHOOLS By DR TANCRED BORENIUS LONDON • WILLIAM HEINEMANN A CATALOGUE OFTHE PAINTINGS AT DOUGHTY HOUSE RICHMOND ELSEWHERE IN THE COLLECTION OF SIR FREDERICK COOK BT VISCONDE DE MONSERRATE EDITED BY HERBERT COOK, M.A., F.S.A. HON. MEMBER OF THE ROYAL ACADEMY OF MILAN VOLUME II DUTCH AND FLEMISH SCHOOLS By J. O. KRONIG LONDON WILLIAM HEINEMANN M DCCCC XIV PREFATORY NOTE THE second volume of the Cook colledtion is devoted to the Dutch and Flemish Schools. The art of the so-called School of the Early Netherlands is reserved for the third volume, which will also contain the English, French, German and Spanish se&ions. In the present volume 190 Dutch and Flemish piitures are recorded, and of these 100 are illustrated either on photogravure plates or by collotype process. The former are executed by the Rembrandt Photogravure Co., of 36 Basinghall Street, E.C.; the latter are the work of Messrs Knighton & Cutts, of Red Lion Court, Fleet Street, E.C. As in the previous volume, single photographs can be obtained either from Signor Domenico Anderson, of Rome, or from Mr W. E. Gray, of 92 Queen’s Road, Bays- water; the register number for ordering is always quoted whenever the photograph exists. The text has been entrusted to Mr J.
    [Show full text]
  • The Prophet Elijah and the Widow of Zarephath C
    National Gallery of Art NATIONAL GALLERY OF ART ONLINE EDITIONS Dutch Paintings of the Seventeenth Century Cornelis van Poelenburch Dutch, 1594/1595 - 1667 The Prophet Elijah and the Widow of Zarephath c. 1630 oil on panel overall: 35.6 x 47 cm (14 x 18 1/2 in.) framed: 51.1 x 62.1 x 5.1 cm (20 1/8 x 24 7/16 x 2 in.) Gift of Joseph F. McCrindle in honor of John Thomas Rowe, Jr. 2004.101.2 ENTRY The Prophet Elijah and the Widow of Zarephath illustrates the passage in 1 Kings 17:8–24 that recounts how the Lord led the prophet Elijah to Zarephath, where he met a widow and her son gathering sticks.[1] Elijah asked the widow for some water and bread, and although she was destitute because of the draught that had plagued the land for more than three years, she used her last bit of flour and oil to cook for him. Elijah then blessed her and her child and assured them that their supplies of flour and oil would never be diminished. Shortly thereafter the widow's son died, and Elijah prayed that the Lord would return the child to life. The Lord heard Elijah's prayer and returned the boy's soul to his body. This Old Testament story was often interpreted as exemplifying the power of faith to achieve miracles. It also portends New Testament accounts of Christ’s crucifixion and resurrection. The way the widow's son clutches a large bundle of sticks anticipates Christ’s carrying of the cross on the way to Golgotha, and because the boy was brought back from the dead, he was also seen as alluding to the resurrected Christ.[2] Significantly, when this painting appeared at auction in Paris in 1752, it was sold as a pendant to a painting by Poelenburch of Abraham and Isaac, another Old Testament story that was considered to embody the power of faith and to prefigure Christ’s death and resurrection.[3] In Poelenburch’s painting the meeting of the prophet, shown wrapped in a red robe, and the widow, who kneels before him, occurs near the end of the day under cerulean blue skies.
    [Show full text]