DOCSLIB.ORG

Linking Brownfields Redevelopment and Greenfields Protection for Sustainable Development

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Linking Brownfields Redevelopment and Greenfields Protection for Sustainable Development Linking Brownfields Redevelopment and Greenfields Protection for Sustainable Development Great Lakes Commission Argus II Building 400 Fourth Street Ann Arbor, MI 48103-4816 June 2001 Linking Brownfields Redevelopment and Greenfields Protection for Sustainable Development Table of Contents Foreword ................................................................................................................. 1 Acknowledgments ..................................................................................................... 2 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 3 I. Development and Farmland Conversion in the Great Lakes Region ............................ 5 A. Overview ................................................................................................................... 5 B. Metropolitan Populations Changes ................................................................................ 6 C. Development and Agricultural Land ............................................................................. 6 II. Brownfields in the Great Lakes Region .................................................................... 10 A. Overview ................................................................................................................... 10 B. Barriers in Brief ........................................................................................................... 10 C. State and Provincial Policies to Reduce Barriers ............................................................. 13 D. Summary Perspective .................................................................................................. 19 III. Community Involvement in Brownfields Decisionmaking .......................................... 20 A. Overview of Community Involvement ........................................................................... 20 B. The Milwaukee and Detroit Workshops ........................................................................ 20 C. Workshop Findings ..................................................................................................... 21 D. Public Participation Requirements in Brownfields Programs Among the Great Lakes States ................................................................................................ 22 IV. Greenfields in the Great Lakes Region .................................................................. 26 A. Overview ................................................................................................................... 26 B. Barriers to Greenfields Protection .................................................................................. 26 C. State/Provincial Policies to Protect Greenfields ............................................................... 30 D. Private Sector Initiatives to Protect Greenfields ............................................................... 41 V. New Policy Directions in Brownfields Redevelopment and Greenfields Protection ........ 44 A. Brownfields Cleanup vs. Containment: Exposure Controls and RCRA Reforms .................. 44 B. Tracking Brownfields Successes .................................................................................... 45 C. Public Sector Funding: Catalyst or Bailout? .................................................................... 47 D. Brownfields and Sustainability ...................................................................................... 47 E. Green Infrastructure and What to Do With Brownfields Nobody Wants ............................ 48 F. Partnerships and Intermediaries .................................................................................... 50 ii G. Transfer of Development Rights .................................................................................... 53 H. Comprehensive Farmland Protection ............................................................................. 56 I. Brownfields, Greenfields and Planning .......................................................................... 58 J. Revenue Sharing ......................................................................................................... 63 Case Studies • A Development Dilemma––Where Should Large Projects Go? ........................................... 52 • Chicago Collar Counties Address Growth Pressures .......................................................... 57 • Great Lakes States Advance Planning/Smart Growth ......................................................... 61 • Ohio’s Conservation and Revitalization Fund ................................................................... 65 Strategic Actions for Brownfields Redevelopment and Greenfields Protection ................... 66 A. Brownfields-Greenfields Linkages .................................................................................. 66 B. Greenfields Protection ................................................................................................... 71 C. Brownfields/Urban Revitalization ................................................................................... 73 BRIDGES Project Advisory Committee ........................................................................ 78 Tables 1. Developed Nonfederal Land between 1982-1997 .......................................................... 5 2. Farmland Changes and Population Growth in Selected Great Lakes Metropolitan Areas .... 9 3. Liability Exemptions/Protections .................................................................................... 15 4. Cleanup Related Grants and Loans ............................................................................... 16 5. Redevelopment-Related Grants and Loans ..................................................................... 16 6. Great Lakes States’ Farm Real Estate Values 1996 and 2000 ............................................ 27 7. Change in Prime Farmland, 1982-1997 ......................................................................... 28 8. Great Lakes States’ Agricultural District Programs ........................................................... 36 9. Number of Acres Enrolled in Federal Farmland Protection Programs Among Great Lakes States ....................................................................................................... 38 10. Brownfields Partnerships .............................................................................................. 50 11. Jurisdictions in Great Lakes States with TDR Programs .................................................... 54 Figures 1. Net Farmland Loss in Great Lakes States 1982-1997 ....................................................... 8 2. Net Farmland Loss in the U.S. Great Lakes Basin 1982-1997 ........................................... 8 3. Percentage of Total City Land in Brownfields ................................................................. 10 Matrices 1. Great Lakes State and Provincial Brownfields Redevelopment Policy Matrix ..................... 25 2. Great Lakes State and Provincial Farmland Protection Policy Matrix ................................. 43 iii Linking Brownfields Redevelopment and Greenfields Protection for Sustainable Development Foreword The Great Lakes are the largest system of fresh surface water on earth. They bring to mind breathtaking vistas, magnificent beaches and plentiful fishing. The Great Lakes also support prominent cities and places of commerce along their shores and anchor a region of agricultural productivity and economic opportunity. These majestic bodies of water and the land portion of the Great Lakes ecosystem that surrounds them are affected by the continuing growth of metropolitan areas and the virtually uncontrolled sprawl of low-density residential areas. The presence of brownfields and the loss of productive agricultural lands and open space rank high among the detrimental consequences of these trends. Many central city areas have deteriorated, leaving idled contaminated sites and related socio-economic problems in their wake. Meanwhile, new development migrates to outlying greenfields, with commen- surate loss of agricultural lands and open space. In this report prepared by the Great Lakes Commission, the National Wildlife Federation and the Council of Great Lakes Industries, we illustrate opportunities to address these trends in an integrated fashion that can stimulate productive change. With the support of the C.S. Mott Foundation, the primary goal of our effort has been to promote and link brownfields redevelopment and greenfields protection efforts in the interest of advancing sustainable development. We are pleased to add our research findings to the body of work that supports the recommendations from the President’s Council on Sustainable Development (“Sustainable America,” 1996). Paramount among those principles of sustain- able development is that environmental progress will depend on individual, institutional and corporate responsibility, commitment and stewardship. We agree. The project undertaken in preparing this report models this type of collabo- ration on a regional level. A series of strategic actions are the focal point for moving the findings from concept to practice. We encourage you to read this report and take up your responsibility to a sustainable future for the Great Lakes region. Michael J. Donahue Mark Van Putten George H. Kuper President and CEO President and CEO President and CEO Great Lakes Commission National Wildlife Federation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Iconic Projects As Catalysts for Brownfield Redevelopments 106 200 M Appendix I
    Iconic projects as catalysts for brownfeld redevelopments The developers’ perspective towards the conditions of iconic projects that incite brownfeld redevelopments Master thesis, June 2019 By Misha Gorter I Colophon Colofon Iconic projects as catalysts for brownfeld redevelopments The developers’ perspective towards the conditions of iconic projects that incite brownfeld redevelopments Student Student: Misha Gorter Student number: 4376323 Address: Jesseplaats 6, 2611 GZ, Delft E-mail address: [email protected] Phone number: +31 (0)6 463 769 70 Date: 21.06.2019 Presentation date: 28.06.2019 University University: Delft University of Technology Faculty: Architecture and the Built Environment Address: Julianalaan 134, 2628 SL, Delft Master track: Management in the Built Environment Phone number: +31 (0)15 278 41 59 Graduation Graduation lab: Urban Development Management (UDM) Graduation topic: Sustainable Area Transformations Document: P5 report Title: Iconic projects as catalysts for brownfeld redevelopments Supervisory team Mentors TU Delft Dr. W.J. (Wouter Jan) Verheul (1st mentor) | MBE, Urban Development Management Dr. H.T. (Hilde) Remøy (2nd mentor) | MBE, Real Estate Management Dr. R.J. (Reinout) Kleinhans (3rd mentor) | OTB, Urban Renewal and Housing Supervisors Brink Management / Advies Ir. T. (Tristan) Kunen | Sr. Manager Ontwikkelen & Investeren Ir. B. (Bas) Muijsson | Consultant Ontwikkelen & Investeren Front cover and section photo’s: Jochem van Bochove Iconic projects as catalysts for brownfeld redevelopments II “If we knew what we were doing, it wouldn’t be called research would it?” ~ Albert Einstein1 ---------------- 1. In Natural Capitalism (1st edition) by P. Hawken, A. Lovins & L. Hunter Lovins, 1999, Boston: Little, Brown and Company, p. 272. III Preface Preface I started my graduation with a fascination for the huge Dutch residential demands that needs to be tackled by building 1.000.000 new dwellings before 2030.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Development Plan
    Uptown Neighborhood Strategic Development Plan Prepared by: In coordination with:: COUNTY E c . o p n r o o m C ic nt Adopted: March 3, 2015 Developme Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Uptown Redevelopment Vision ................................................................................................................................................ 3 Existing Conditions Analysis ..................................................................................................................................................... 6 Assets & Opportunities ............................................................................................................................................................ 14 Recommendations for Revitalization .................................................................................................................................... 20 Implementation ......................................................................................................................................................................... 33 Prepared by Vandewalle & Associates, Madison and Milwaukee, Wisconsin In coordination with the Uptown Strategic Development Plan Project Management Team*: • Mayor John Dickert, City of Racine • State Representative Cory Mason • Chris Eperjesy, Twin Disc • Brett Neylan, SC Johnson & Son • Tom Friedel,
    [Show full text]
  • Brownfield Association
    Doing the Deal, Before the Deal Does You! About the National Brownfield Association Non-profit member-based educational organization for Brownfield professionals Network for exchanging ideas, experiences, and information Property Owners, Developers/Investors, Transaction Support Professionals Government Information, Education, and Events STAMP (Site Technical Assistance for Municipal Project) Building Sustainable Communities Workshop series The Big Deal October 3-4 Chicago IL Leadership BOD Advisory Board Chapters Sponsorship Association Events Newsletter Membership Group Individual Program Agenda 10:15- 12:15pm Workshop Goals/Overview of Tri-State Brownfield Programs John Means, WA Department of Ecology About the Brownfield Market Property Valuation Robert Colangelo, NBA Brownfield Risks and Solutions Robert Colangelo, National Brownfield Association Frank Chmelik, Chmelik, Sitkin & Davies 12:15 – 1:00 Lunch Public financing and Incentives to Stimulate Site Reuse Mike Stringer, Maul Foster & Alongi, Inc. Case Study: Boise Cascade Mill, Yakima Brad Hill, Principal Cascade Mill Properties, LLC Structuring the Transaction Robert Colangelo, NBA 3:00-4:30pm Role Playing Exercise Jim Darling, Maul Foster & Alongi, Inc. Robert Colangelo, NBA Presenters Robert Colangelo, National Brownfield Association Frank Chmelik, Chmelik, Sitkin & Davies Brad Hill, Principal Cascade Mill Properties, LLC Jim Darling, Maul Foster & Alongi, Inc. Mike Stringer, Maul Foster & Alongi, Inc. Workshop Goals Overview of Tri-State Brownfield Programs John Means, WA Department of Ecology About the Brownfield Market Robert Colangelo, NBA Publications Brownfield News. Founder and Publisher, Robert V. Colangelo, Environomics Communications, Inc. Chicago: Feb. 1997- Dec. 2008: Vol. 1-12. Szymeco, Lisa A., and Thomas C. Voice. Brownfield Redevelopment Guidebook for Michigan. Ed. Robert V. Colangelo, et al. Chicago: Robert V.
    [Show full text]
  • Repurposing Suburbia
    Repurposing Suburbia Tenny Vasilyan A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Professional Masters of Architecture Azrieli School of Architecture Carleton University Ottawa, Ontario Advisor: Benjamin Gianni © Copyright 2011 Tenny Vasilyan Library and Archives Bibliotheque et 1*1 Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre re'fe'rence ISBN: 978-0-494-81627-1 Our file Notre r6f6rence ISBN: 978-0-494-81627-1 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduce, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par I'lnternet, preter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans le loan, distribute and sell theses monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non­ support microforme, papier, electronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la these ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Developers' Price Setting Behaviour in Urban Residential Redevelopment
    The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available on Emerald Insight at: www.emeraldinsight.com/1753-9269.htm ’ Urban Developers price setting residential behaviour in urban residential redevelopment redevelopment projects projects Rolf Barlindhaug 71 Norwegian Institute for Urban and Regional Research, Department for Housing-, Place- and Regional Research (NIBR), Oslo and Received 22 March 2017 Revised 17 August 2017 Akershus University College, Oslo, Norway, and 12 November 2017 17 November 2017 Berit Irene Nordahl 20 November 2017 Accepted 21 November 2017 Faculty for Landscape and Society, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway Abstract Purpose – This paper aims to investigate whether developers’ ask lower prices on homes in redevelopment sites than they do on similar units in smaller developments completed over a shorter time span. It also investigates whether developers price units differently at different stages of the redevelopment process. The development of designated redevelopment areas often consists of multiple projects spread across several years, some in parallel, some sequential. New units are put on the market in a piecemeal fashion, and infrastructure, shared green spaces and shared facilities are installed successively. Design/methodology/approach – A hedonic price model is used to analyse sales prices of 7,000 new apartments in Oslo sold between 2011 and 2015, all else being equal. The paper distinguishes between infill as one-stage projects, and multi-staged competitive and multi-staged monopolistic redevelopments. Findings – Dwellings in redevelopment projects sell at a lower price than similar dwellings in infill projects. In competitive redevelopments, those in charge of the last projects put a slightly higher price on apartments.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3: Plan Framework
    The City of Clewiston CRA Community Redevelopment Plan (1 st Draft) Chapter 3: Plan Framework Figure 3.1 Venture Ave Corridor “True communities do not just occur; they are born of a vision” Introduction This chapter of the Clewiston CRA Community Redevelopment Plan discusses the CRA’s land use patterns and trends and addresses future redevelopment of the CRA. This information is designed to help the CRA advisory Board and the Clewiston City Commission sitting as the CRA Board make informed decisions about how to grow in the future. Location Clewiston, Florida is located in Eastern Hendry County, in Florida’s rural interior on the southwest shore of Lake Okeechobee, 26.75N -80.94 W, 61 miles west of West Palm Beach and 62 miles east of Fort Myers. It is the larger of two incorporated cities in Hendry County, the other being LaBelle. U.S. Highway 27, which in Clewiston is SR80, bisects the city. U.S. Highway 27 is Florida’s central artery from Tallahassee to Miami. Brief History The first inhabitants of Clewiston were local Indians who camped on the shores of Lake Okeechobee and fished for the lake’s abundance of fish. This is still a major draw to the region, with modern fishermen taking advantage of the Roland Martin Marina and Resort as well as other fishing guides. The current site of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regional office served as a base of operations for scores of professional fishermen as late as the 1920's. The Clewiston area also attracted its share pioneer farmers, most notably a temporary settlement of Japanese farmers who began to grow vegetables in the fertile lakeside soil in about 1915.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparing and Contrasting the Dynamics Influencing
    COMPARING AND CONTRASTING THE DYNAMICS INFLUENCING URBAN AND ECONOMIC LAND DEVELOPMENT SURROUNDING DALLAS-FORT WORTH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AND DALLAS LOVE FIELD AIRPORT by ANTHONY K. CHANDLER DISSERTATION Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Arlington in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON December 2019 Copyright © by Anthony K. Chandler All Rights Reserved II ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First, I would like to give all honor and praise to God for blessing me along the way of this journey and without His grace, none of this would be possible. I would also like to thank all my family and friends who have helped and encouraged me to continue and achieve, not only this pursuit, but also all the other endeavors I have undertaken. A special appreciation is given to Dr. Andershir Anjomani, who has been my advisor throughout this educational expedition and all the difficulties and victories that have occurred during this time. My final and greatest appreciation goes to my mother, Willie Mae Chandler. This accomplishment and others have been just a small token that I can give back for the boundless sacrifices given to me. Her countless words of prayer, encouragement, reassurance, and inspiration have helped me so many times when my faith alone seemed to wane. To her, my Mother, I say thank you with all that I have, I love you with all my heart and job well done. III ABSTRACT COMPARING AND CONTRASTING THE DYNAMICS INFLUENCING URBAN AND ECONOMIC LAND DEVELOPMENT SURROUNDING DALLAS-FORT WORTH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AND DALLAS LOVE FIELD AIRPORT Anthony K.
    [Show full text]
  • WSHFC | BOND / Tax Credit Program Policies
    BOND / TAX CREDIT PROGRAM POLICIES 2017 Washington State Housing Finance Commission Approved August 2017 Contents Introduction ...............................................................................................................................6 1.1 Bond Financing............................................................................................................................................................. 6 1.1.1 Projects financed with Commission-Issued Bonds .........................................................6 1.2 Projects financed with Bonds issued by an Issuer other than the Commission ................................ 8 Program Limits ...........................................................................................................................9 2.1 Maximum Allocation of Tax Credit – WAC 262-01-130(7) ........................................................................ 9 2.2 Maximum Allocation of Bond Cap ........................................................................................................................ 9 2.3 Maximizing the Use of Recycled Bond Cap ....................................................................................................... 9 2.4 TOTAL DEVELOPMENT COST LIMIT – WAC 262-01-130(8)(a) .............................................................. 9 2.4.1 King County Limits ..................................................................................................... 10 2.4.2 Pierce and Snohomish TDC Limits ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Property Boundary Change for Residential Development: a Study of Brisbane, Australia
    Property Boundary Change for Residential Development: A study of Brisbane, Australia Rachel Gallagher LLB (Hons IIA); BSc (Geographical Sciences) A thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2018 School of Earth and Environmental Sciences 1 Abstract To help counter the negative impacts of urban sprawl, the Queensland Government has introduced a policy of urban consolidation whereby Brisbane has a target of 94% of new dwellings being from infill development (Department of Local Government, Infrastructure and Planning 2017). Infill is the development within existing urban boundaries, and to reach such a level requires not only a transformation of the dwelling types being constructed (for example, a change in preference for detached houses to apartments), but also a transformation of the urban structure of the city. Like many metropolitan strategies, however, greenfield development within existing local government boundaries is included as meeting urban consolidation targets. Undeveloped land within existing urban boundaries is a finite resource meaning that, once such greenfield sites are utilised, infill of existing residential areas, or greyfield development, will be crucial at meeting urban consolidation targets by redeveloping existing urban areas at higher densities. Despite overarching planning schemes aimed at densifying existing urban areas, infill development in Australia is generally informal, lacking any specific government policy focus or intervention. Little scholarly research is available on how urban consolidation targets and infill are to be achieved in a practical sense. Multiple dwellings such as apartment buildings are denser and taller, therefore requiring larger footprints than a single dwelling. Due to the small size of existing residential lots, amalgamation is often required if properties are to redevelop at higher densities.
    [Show full text]
  • Construction Efficiency Opportunities: Setting the Foundation for Net-Zero Energy Homes in Australia
    Construction Efficiency Opportunities: Setting the Foundation for Net-Zero Energy Homes in Australia Tomi Winfree 2009 International Building and Construction Fellowship Fellowship funded by Construction and Property Services Industry Skills Council (CPSISC) ISS Institute Inc DECEMBER 2012 © ISS Institute T 03 9347 4583 Level 1 F 03 9348 1474 189 Faraday Street [email protected] Carlton Vic E AUSTRALIA 3053 W www.issinstitute.org.au Published by International Specialised Skills Institute, Melbourne Extract published on www.issinstitute.org.au © Copyright ISS Institute December 2012 This publication is copyright. No part may be reproduced by any process except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. Whilst this report has been accepted by ISS Institute, ISS Institute cannot provide expert peer review of the report, and except as may be required by law no responsibility can be accepted by ISS Institute for the content of the report or any links therein, or omissions, typographical, print or photographic errors, or inaccuracies that may occur after publication or otherwise. ISS Institute do not accept responsibility for the consequences of any action taken or omitted to be taken by any person as a consequence of anything contained in, or omitted from, this report. Executive Summary Australia will begin to meet the government’s emission reduction targets, in part, when builders and tradespeople construct high performance buildings to energy efficient design specifications based on proven construction techniques, tested products and technology solutions leading to net-zero energy homes. Designers, builders and tradespeople have an opportunity to significantly contribute to high-efficiency construction through design construction methods and technological solutions, while reducing builders’ costs through material and labour efficiency.
    [Show full text]
  • A ULI Advisory Services Panel Report
    Niagara Falls New York September 23–28, 2012 A ULI Advisory ServicesReport Panel A ULI Niagara Falls New York Strategies for Reimagining the Former Rainbow Centre Mall and Downtown Niagara Falls September 23–28, 2012 Funded in part through generous grants from: National Grid and Urban Land Institute Foundation A ULI Advisory Services Panel Report About the Urban Land Institute THE MISSION OF THE URBAN LAND INSTITUTE is ■ Sharing knowledge through education, applied research, to provide leadership in the responsible use of land and in publishing, and electronic media; and creating and sustaining thriving communities worldwide. ■ Sustaining a diverse global network of local practice ULI is committed to and advisory efforts that address current and future ■ Bringing together leaders from across the fields of real challenges. estate and land use policy to exchange best practices Established in 1936, the Institute today has nearly 30,000 and serve community needs; members worldwide, representing the entire spectrum ■ Fostering collaboration within and beyond ULI’s of the land use and development disciplines. ULI relies membership through mentoring, dialogue, and problem heavily on the experience of its members. It is through solving; member involvement and information resources that ULI has been able to set standards of excellence in develop- ■ Exploring issues of urbanization, conservation, regen- ment practice. The Institute has long been recognized eration, land use, capital formation, and sustainable as one of the world’s most respected and widely quoted development; sources of objective information on urban planning, ■ Advancing land use policies and design practices growth, and development. that respect the uniqueness of both built and natural environments; Cover photo: USA Niagara Development Corp.
    [Show full text]
  • Huon Valley Council Section 35 Report
    ATTACHMENT C6 Planning Assessment Report (PSA-2/2017) Applicant Mr Rowe Agent PDA Surveyors Property Part of Lot 1 Channel Highway, Cygnet (CT: 167891/1) (‘Property’); other subject of property as set out in the application application Application Application under Section 43A of the former Land Use Planning and Approvals Act 1993 (‘Act’): (i) For the initiation and certification of a Draft Amendment to the Huon Valley Interim Planning Scheme 2015; and (ii) For the issue of a Planning Permit under Section 43C(1) of the Act for subdivision of part of the Property for the creation of residential lots and other lots on the Property and for the creation of three Channel Highway road lots, and for the carrying out of associated works. The Section 43A application is a combined Section 33 and Section 43C(1) application under the Act. Report CONTENTS INTRODUCTION - SECTION 43A APPLICATION SECTION 1 AND 2: ASSESSMENT OF DRAFT AMENDMENT PLANNING ASSESSMENT REPORT: ASSESSMENT OF SUBDIVISION Attachments ATTACHMENT A: Property Site Plan CT 167891/1 ATTACHMENT B: Section 43A Application Application Submission (37 pages) PDA Surveyors Annexures to Application Submission PDA Surveyors 1. Plans including Plan of Subdivision PDA Content page: V704UH (dated 10-8-2020) Surveyors Plans: V704UH: 0; 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 9 (8 pages; dated 10-8-2020) Plans: V704UH: Plans: 10 – 11 (31-7-2020) Plans: V704UH: Plans: 50D; 51D; 52D (26-9-2019) 2. Section 43A Application Form PDA Surveyors 3. Consent Documentation Property owners 4. Title Documentation Property owners 5. Cygnet WWTP Odour Buffer Review (2017) Pitt and Sherry 6.
    [Show full text]