DOCSLIB.ORG

Mcfarland Comprehensive Plan Volume 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Village of McFarland Board Village Plan Commission Brad Czebotar, President Brad Czebotar, Chair Jerry Adrian, Trustee Dan Kolk, Trustee Member Stephanie Brassington, Trustee Bruce Fischer, Citizen Member Carolyn Clow, Trustee Peter Gentry, Citizen Member Dan Kolk, Trustee Cathy Kirby, Citizen Member Mary Pat Lytle, Trustee Tom Rogers, Citizen Member Shaun O'Hearn, Trustee Jeff Sorenson, Citizen Member Tom Mooney, Former Trustee Kate Barrett, Former Citizen Member Clair Utter, Former Trustee Ron Berger, Former Citizen Member Other Village committees were instrumental in the preparation and review of this volume Primary Village Staff Consultants Pauline Boness, Community Development Director MDRoffers Consulting LLC Matt Schuenke, Village Administrator Planning and Project Management Karen Knoll, Community Development Clerk www.mdroffers.com Allan Colville, Public Works Director Brian Berquist, Village Engineer, Town & Country Engineering Strand Associates Inc. Mapping 5915 Milwaukee Street www.strand.com McFarland, WI 53558 (608) 838-3153 DRXNL Studio www.mcfarland.wi.us Design www.drxnl.com Volume 1: Conditions and Issues Comprehensive Plan Page 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1: Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 A Brief History of McFarland’s Growth .......................................................................................................................................................... 4 Reason for Planning and for this Volume ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 Location and Planning Context ....................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Chapter 2: Demographics and Trends .............................................................................................................................................................. 8 Population Trends ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 8 Age Profile ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 9 Race and Ethnicity ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 11 Population Projections .................................................................................................................................................................................. 11 Education and Income Levels ....................................................................................................................................................................... 12 Chapter 3: Agricultural, Natural, and Cultural Resources .............................................................................................................................. 14 Agriculture ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 14 Natural Resources ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 16 Cultural Resources ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 22 Chapter 4: Land Use ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 24 Existing Land Use Inventory .......................................................................................................................................................................... 24 Land Development Trends ............................................................................................................................................................................ 27 Existing and Potential Land Use Conflicts .................................................................................................................................................... 28 Projected Land Use Demand and Supply ..................................................................................................................................................... 28 Volume 1: Conditions and Issues Comprehensive Plan Page 2 Growth Factors Analysis ................................................................................................................................................................................ 30 Chapter 5: Transportation ............................................................................................................................................................................... 33 Existing Transportation Network .................................................................................................................................................................. 33 Review of State and Regional Transportation Plans .................................................................................................................................... 37 Chapter 6: Utilities and Community Facilities ................................................................................................................................................ 42 Village Facilities and Services ........................................................................................................................................................................ 42 Other Community Facilities .......................................................................................................................................................................... 46 Utilities ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 49 Chapter 7: Housing and Neighborhood Development ................................................................................................................................... 52 Household Characteristics ............................................................................................................................................................................ 52 Neighborhood Development Framework .................................................................................................................................................... 57 Chapter 8: Economic Development ................................................................................................................................................................ 60 Economic Context ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 60 Existing Village Plans Related to Economic Development .......................................................................................................................... 67 Chapter 9: Intergovernmental Cooperation ................................................................................................................................................... 70 State and Regional Planning Framework ..................................................................................................................................................... 70 Local Planning Framework and Agreements ............................................................................................................................................... 72 ADOPTION AND AMENDMENT HISTORY Plan Updated August 28, 2017; Village Board Ordinance 2017-19 (following August 21, 2017 adoption of Plan (Replaced 2006 Plan): Commission Resolution 2017-17 that recommended plan) 2017 Plan Amended: Volume 1: Conditions and Issues Comprehensive Plan Page 3 CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION A Brief History of McFarland’s Growth Originally settled by German, Irish and Norwegian immigrants, the Village of McFarland has evolved from freestanding resort town and farm market center along a rail stop, into a suburban community within the expanding Madison metro area. Established in 1856, the Village was founded by a railroad worker by the name of McFarland. Promoted to McFarland’s first station agent, William McFarland built a large home used as a boarding house/hotel for workers, settlers and visitors who were arriving by train. The McFarland House has remained in good repair over the years and now operates as a cafe. The rail line is still in operation. The Village’s early industries included farming, along with harvesting winter ice and fish from Lake Waubesa for rail shipment to Chicago markets. A small resort industry later developed
Recommended publications
  • Simulation of the Effects of Operating Lakes Mendota, Monona, And

    Simulation of the Effects of Operating Lakes Mendota, Monona, And

    Simulation of the Effects of Operating Lakes Mendota, Monona, and Waubesa, South-Central Wisconsin, as Multipurpose Reservoirs to Maintain Dry-Weather Flow By William R. Krug U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open-File Report 99-67 Prepared in cooperation with the DANE COUNTY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION WISCONSIN GEOLOGICAL AND NATURAL HISTORY SURVEY Middleton, Wisconsin 1999 USGS science for a changing world U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director The use of firm, trade, and brand names in this report is for identification purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey. For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services 8505 Research Way Box 25286 Middleton, Wl 53562-3586 Denver, CO 80225-0286 CONTENTS Abstract................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction.............................................................................................._^ 1 Purpose and scope....................................................................................................................................................... 2 Physical setting ..........................................................................................................................................................
  • Stoughton Area Fuda

    Stoughton Area Fuda

    STOUGHTON AREA FUDA Natural Resources Environmental Conditions Report | Natural Resources i Stoughton Area Future Urban Development Area Planning Study Environmental Conditions Report: Natural Resources Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 1 A. Physical Geography and Surface Geology .................................................................................. 3 1. Mineral Resources .................................................................................................................. 5 2. Steep Slopes and Woodlands ................................................................................................. 5 3. Soils ....................................................................................................................................... 14 a. Soils Underlain by Sandy Loam Glacial Till ........................................................................ 14 b. Soils Formed in Outwash Material.................................................................................... 15 c. Hydric Soils ........................................................................................................................ 15 d. Depth to Bedrock .............................................................................................................. 17 e. Development Site Analysis ................................................................................................ 21 f. Relative Infiltration
  • (G) Intergovernmental Cooperation Information

    (G) Intergovernmental Cooperation Information

    TOWN OF VIENNA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MSA PROJECT 0120125 (G) Intergovernmental Cooperation Information 1. LOCAL AND REGIONAL PLAN COORDINATION Smart Growth Grant Joint Application (Westport, Springfield, Waunakee, Middleton) North Mendota Parkway Corridor Project (2002 – ongoing) U.S. Highway 12 Planning Project (2002) Dane County Farmland Preservation Plan (1981) Dane County Design Dane! (1998) Dane County Farmlands and Neighborhoods Plan (2000) Dane County Storm Water Management Plan and Ordinance (?) Madison Urban Area and Dane County Bicycle Transportation Plan (2000) Village of Waunakee Comprehensive Plan City of Middleton Comprehensive Plan Town of Springfield Comprehensive Plan Lower Rock River Basin Plan (DNR) (1998) Lower Rock River Water Quality Management Plan (DNR) (2001) • Lake Mendota-Yahara River Watershed Plan (DNR) • Six-Mile Creek and Pheasant Branch Watershed Plan (DNR) District 1 Six-Year Construction Project Plan (WisDOT) Dane County 10-Year Capital Projects Plan (2002) Town of Vienna Comprehensive Plan (1999) 2. INTERGOVERNMENTAL EFFORTS, AGREEMENTS AND RELATIONSHIPS There are several areas of intergovernmental cooperation between the Town of Vienna and its neighbors: • The Village of DeForest exercises extraterritorial zoning authority over the commercial development area near the I39/90/94 interchange, and jointly reviews development projects within the Town portion of this area through the ETZ committee. • The Town of Vienna provides water and sanitary services to its urban service areas through cooperation with the Village of DeForest. • There are informal growth management agreements with the Village of DeForest regarding annexation. • There are no agreements in place with either the Village of Waunakee or the Village of Dane. • The Town often works cooperatively with special districts such as the Waunakee and DeForest Public Libraries, as well as the Waunakee, DeForest, Poynette, and Lodi School Districts.
  • Natural Resources Natural Resources

    Natural Resources Natural Resources

    Natural Resources Natural Resources Introduction The City of Fitchburg geography was formed by the last of the glaciers, with the Milton Moraine generally dividing the City from southeast to northwest. The City has land in two of the major drainage basins of Dane County, each with two main watersheds within Fitchburg. A few large areas of sediment deposits form areas of little topographic variation, which provide good farmland, but also lead to pockets of closed basins. City water supply is dependant upon public wells into the deep Mount Simon and Eau Claire sandstones, making recharge of groundwater important to the long term viability of the community’s water supply. Woodlands are prevalent in parts of the City, particularly in areas of steeper topography. Physical Setting Physiography of Southern Wisconsin Soils The last Continental Glacier covered most of Wisconsin until 12,000 to 15,000 years ago. Fitchburg is between two distinct physical landscapes, the glaciated and driftless (unglaciated) areas. The glaciated area was covered with layers of sand, clay, and gravel left by the series of glacial advances. The driftless area shows no evidence of glaciers. The soils are typically well-drained. According to the Town of Fitchburg Development Plan (1978), “as a result of this location, the most dominant glacial features are two terminal moraines deposited by the Green Bay Lobe of the Continental Glacier.” Terminal moraines formed at the outer edge of the maximum extent of a glacier or glacial lobe when the ice melted and deposited the debris carried by the glacier. Two terminal moraines can be found within the City of Fitchburg.
  • 2018 Yahara Chain of Lakes Flooding Technical Work Group Report

    2018 Yahara Chain of Lakes Flooding Technical Work Group Report

    2018 Yahara Chain of Lakes Flooding Technical Work Group Report Photo of flooding in Tenney Park with Lake Mendota in the background. Courtesy of Rick Lange (Dane County Sheriff Office) performing drone footage of flooding in August 2018. February 1, 2019 Table of Contents 1.0 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................ 1 2.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 2 2.1 The Yahara Lakes and Flooding .......................................................................................................... 4 2.2 2018 Water Levels and Management ................................................................................................ 7 3.0 Technical Approach ................................................................................................................................ 9 3.1 INFOS Framework .............................................................................................................................. 9 3.2 INFOS Model Performance .............................................................................................................. 10 3.2.1 Comparison between Modeled and Observed Lake Levels ...................................................... 10 3.2.2 Comparison between Modeled and Observed River Water Surface Profiles ........................... 11 3.2.3 Comparison between Modeled
  • Geology and Ground-Water Resources of Dane County, Wisconsin

    Geology and Ground-Water Resources of Dane County, Wisconsin

    Geology and Ground-Water Resources of Dane County, Wisconsin GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1779-U Prepared in cooperation with the University of Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey Geology and Ground -Water Resources of Dane County, Wisconsin By DENZEL R. CLINE CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE HYDROLOGY OF THE UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPEF 1779-U Prepared in cooperation with the University of Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1965 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director The U.S. Geological Survey Library catalog card for this publication appears after index. For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page Abstract____-_.___.___._____.___..__.__.._.. _ Ul Introduction._____________________________________________________ 2 Purpose and scope_____________________________________________ 2 Description of the area_________________________________________ 2 Physiography _____________________________________________ 3 Climate __________________________________________________ 4 Previous investigations._______-__--________-_-___---__-__---___ 5 Numbering system.__________________________________________ 5 Acknowledgments. ____________________________________________ 5 Geology._________________________________________________________ 7 Bedrock units and their water-yielding characteristics ______________ 11 Precambrian
  • Yahara Waterways Water Trail Guide – 2007 a Guide to the Environmental, Cultural and Historical Treasures of the Yahara Waterways

    Yahara Waterways Water Trail Guide – 2007 a Guide to the Environmental, Cultural and Historical Treasures of the Yahara Waterways

    Yahara Waterways Water Trail Guide – 2007 A guide to the environmental, cultural and historical treasures of the Yahara waterways. Land Shaped by the Glaciers For centuries waterways have been usable long-distance “trails and highways” prior to other forms of transportation. They played a key role in the exploration and settlement of North America. Early European settlers and Native Americans used the area for fishing, hunting and transpor- The Yahara Watershed in Dane County tation. Mail at one time was delivered by (showing sub-watersheds) boat on the Yahara Lakes. Now only some Yahara River & Lake Mendota of our major rivers are being used for Six Mile & Pheasant Branch Dane Creeks commercial transportation as railroads, Lake County Mendota Lake Lake Monona highways and air transportation carry Wingra Yahara River & Lake Monona Lake Waubesa Yahara River & Lake Kegonsa the majority of commercial traffic. The Lake Kegonsa waterway trails described within are for recreation, giving you a chance to enjoy the local blueways (paddling trails) and explore the vast array of wildlife, commune with nature, and learn about our area’s rich cultural heritage. The Yahara Watershed, or land area that drains into the Yahara River and lakes, covers 359 square miles, more than a quarter of Dane County. Much of the wa- tershed is farmed; however, the watershed also contains most of the urban land of the Madison metropolitan area. In addition, the Yahara Watershed includes Lake Wingra Yahara Waterways – Water Trail Guide 3 some of the largest wetlands that are left in Dane County. The lakes’ watershed includes all or parts of five cities, seven villages and sixteen towns, and is home to about 350,000 people.
  • Yahara Kegonsa Focus Watershed Report PUBL-WT-711 2001

    Yahara Kegonsa Focus Watershed Report PUBL-WT-711 2001

    Yahara Kegonsa Focus Watershed Report PUBL-WT-711 2001 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 2001 Comprehensive Plan for the Yahara River/Lake Kegonsa Watershed: LR06 i GOVERNOR Scott McCallum NATURAL RESOURCES BOARD Trygve A. Solberg, Chair James E. Tiefenthaler, Jr., Vice-Chair Gerald M. O'Brien, Secretary Herbert F. Behnke Howard D. Poulson Catherine L. Stepp Stephen D. Willett Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Darrell Bazzell, Secretary Franc Fennessy, Executive Assistant Steve Miller, Administrator Division of Land Susan L. Sylvester, Administrator Division of Water Ruthe E. Badger, Director South Central Regional Office Marjorie R. Devereaux, Water Leader _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 2001 Comprehensive Plan for the Yahara River/Lake Kegonsa Watershed: LR06 ii South Central Region Headquarters 3911 Fish Hatchery Road Fitchburg, Wisconsin 53711 608-275-3266 Fax: 608-275-3338 TDD: 608-275-3231 Susan J. Oshman, Land Leader Ken Johnson, Lower Rock Basin Water Team Leader Tim Galvin, Rock Basin Land Team Leader Scott McCallum, Governor Darrell Bazzell, Secretary Ruthe E. Badger, Regional Director Subject: Yahara Kegonsa Focus Watershed Report Dear Reader: This Yahara Kegonsa Focus Watershed Report is an appendix to the Rock River State of the Basin report, an "umbrella" report that will provide a broad perspective the resources of the entire Rock River Basin. The Yahara-Kegonsa Watershed Report provides detailed information about water and land resource conditions and emerging threats to these resources and a strategic direction for managing those issues. This focus watershed report is a starting point in our work to find out more about the rich land and water resources and to articulate a management approach that effectively merges citizen perception of issues with scientific understanding of resource condition.
  • An Environmental History of Lake Kegonsa; Perspectives On, and Perceptions Of, a Downstream Eutrophic Lake

    An Environmental History of Lake Kegonsa; Perspectives On, and Perceptions Of, a Downstream Eutrophic Lake

    An Environmental History of Lake Kegonsa; Perspectives on, and Perceptions of, a Downstream Eutrophic Lake Benjamin Polchowski, Angela Baldocchi, and David Waro Abstract People have a negative perception of Lake Kegonsa. It has been called the red-headed, carp-filled, green, “scumsusceptible”, impaired, end of the line, phosphorus catching, step-lake (Golden 2014, 2-3). The environmental history of Lake Kegonsa shows that people have repeatedly used it as a natural resource for the last 12,000 years. Although the water quality has suffered during times of differing perspectives, Lake Kegonsa continues to have an important role as a social and recreational feature. There are stakeholders from the national to the local level involved in the management of Lake Kegonsa’s resources. This project calls out the error in perception with an interactive map illustrating positive perspectives regarding Lake Kegonsa’s importance. By comparing phosphorus, nitrogen, and chlorophyll data with corresponding water quality perspectives we begin to position ourselves to better assess lake health. Proper stewardship can ensure that Lake Kegonsa will continue to fill this important role. 1 Table of Contents Page 1. Introduction……………………………………………………………………………. 3 2. Site, Setting and Landscape………………………………………………………… 4 2.1 Glacial and Late Quaternary……………………………………………….. 5 2.2 Paleoindians………………………………………………………………... 6 2.3 Holocene History……………………………………………………………. 7 2.4 Mound Builders……………………………………………………………… 8 2.5 Ho-Chunk…………………………………………………………………….. 9 2.6 Euro American………………………………………………………………. 9 2.7 Today…………………………………………………………………………. 10 3. Water Quality………………………………………………………………………….. 11 3.1 Eutrophication……………………………………………………………….. 12 3.2 Water Clarity…………………………………………………………………. 12 3.3 Phosphorus…………………………………………………………………... 13 I. Sources…………………………………………………………………. 14 II. Complexities and Interactions……………………………………….. 15 3.4 Nitrogen………………………………………………………………………. 16 I. Sources…………………………………………………………………. 17 II.

  • The Waters of Dane County Yahara Lakes History & Setting

    The Waters of Dane County Dane County is blessed with 69 named lakes, and more than 400 miles of streams and rivers including 14 miles of the Wisconsin River. The total surface water coverage in Dane County is more than 23,000 acres, or 36 square miles. Dane County is also home to 52,000 acres of wetlands. These waters are part of what make this area so special. Water-related recreation activities contribute substantially to the region's economy, with lake users spending an average of $15.00 -$22.00 on each outing for fuel and supplies alone, according to a 1995 study. In 2011 Dane County brought in $893.7 million in tourist dollars. (7/5/2012 Waunakee Tribune “Study finds tourism thrives in Wisconsin”) Water resources contribute to business, industry and agriculture as well. We use 42 million gallons of water a day for business and personal purposes. The Dane County State of the Waters Report (follow link above) is a convenient single reference for those seeking in-depth information about area waters and watersheds. Yahara Lakes History & Setting The Yahara River lakes - Mendota, Monona, Waubesa and Kegonsa - are important in providing scenic beauty and swimming, boating and fishing opportunities to area residents and visitors. As a result, the lakes are highly valued physical resources and an integral part of the quality of life the Dane County residents enjoy. The lakes were formed about 10,000 years ago when the last glacier deposited a thick layer of glacial till (unsorted sediment) over the landscape and dammed up the large pre-glacial Yahara River Valley.

  • Yahara Waterways – Water Trail Guide  Some of the Largest Wetlands That Are Left in Dane County

    This guide is based on Taychopera: A Canoe Guide to Dane County’s Key to Map Symbols 4 Lakes developed in 1984 by the Dane County Environmental Council with text written by Jane Licht. Taychopera means “four Accessible boat launch lakes” in the Ho Chunk tongue. Taychopera is the glacial-formed chain of lakes, marshes and river now known as Mendota, Monona, Accessible fishing pier Waubesa, Kegonsa, Upper and Lower Mud, and the Yahara River. Beach The Yahara Waterways project has been a labor of love for many Boat launch – no parking lot people. This is especially true considering that people volunteering their time have produced this guide. A special thank you and Improved boat launch with parking acknowledgement to the following contributors in the develop- Campsites ment of this 2007 guide: • Dane County Environmental Council for project initiation Carry-in canoe/small boat site and oversight Fishing walk-in access or pier • UW-Extension Environmental Resources Center (Bruce Webendorfer and Jeff Strobel) for editorial assistance, Marina graphic design, and map development Public phone • Dane County Lakes and Watershed Commission Seasonal restrooms • Key Members of the Yahara Waterways Steering Committee: - Mindy Habecker, project coordinator and author, State park sticker required Dane County UW-Extension Warning - Dam! – portage required - Robert Beilman, Madison Audubon Society - Steve Falter, Capitol Water Trails GPS reading - Terry Hiltz, Wisconsin River Alliance 24 Place of interest mentioned in text - Sue Jones, coordinator, Dane County Lakes and Water trail Watershed Commission and Dane County Office of Lakes and Watersheds - Wes Licht, McFarland teacher and environmental The maps contained herein educator are intended to be general - David Liebl, UW-Extension references for area boaters and - Karen Matteoni, Mad City Paddlers are in no way to be considered - Ray Potempa, Friends of Lake Kegonsa Society adequate for navigational - Nancy Saulsbury, Rutabaga purposes.
  • Board Year 2008-2009 Ord. Amdt. 2, 08-09 Amending

    Board Year 2008-2009 Ord. Amdt. 2, 08-09 Amending

    COUNTY BOARD REFERRALS TO COMMITTEE - BOARD YEAR 2008-2009 ORD. AMDT. 2, 08-09 AMENDING CHAPTER 11 OF THE DANE COUNTY CODE OF ORDINANCES, REGARDING LOT SIZE AND COVERAGE IN THE SHORELAND DISTRICT The County Board of Supervisors of the County of Dane does ordain as follows: ARTICLE 1. Unless otherwise expressly stated herein, all references to section and chapter numbers are to those of the Dane County Code of Ordinances. ARTICLE 2. Section 11.03(1) is amended to read as follows: 11.03 SHORELAND REGULATIONS. (1) Building lots: Lots located in shoreland areas shall meet all area, width, density and lot coverage standards required in section 10.05(4) and (5), R -1 residence district, section 10.16(3), general provisions and exceptions of chapter 10 of the Dane County Code of Ordinances. (a) Lot coverage. All lots within the shorel and area shall have a maximum building coverage of 30 percent. Building coverage shall include any structure or structures having a roof supported by posts, columns, or walls and its appendages including, but not limited to, balconies, porches, decks, stoops, fireplaces and chimneys. (b) Minimum area and width for newly created lots. 1. Lots not served by public sanitary sewer. The minimum lot area shall be twenty thousand (20,000) square feet. The minimum lot width at the building setback line shall be one hundred (100) feet and, if adjacent to a navigable body of water, one hundred (100) feet of frontage at the ordinary high water mark. 2. Lots served by public sanitary sewer. The minimum lot area shall be fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet.