DOCSLIB.ORG

Yahara Kegonsa Focus Watershed Report PUBL-WT-711 2001

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Yahara Kegonsa Focus Watershed Report PUBL-WT-711 2001 Yahara Kegonsa Focus Watershed Report PUBL-WT-711 2001 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 2001 Comprehensive Plan for the Yahara River/Lake Kegonsa Watershed: LR06 i GOVERNOR Scott McCallum NATURAL RESOURCES BOARD Trygve A. Solberg, Chair James E. Tiefenthaler, Jr., Vice-Chair Gerald M. O'Brien, Secretary Herbert F. Behnke Howard D. Poulson Catherine L. Stepp Stephen D. Willett Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Darrell Bazzell, Secretary Franc Fennessy, Executive Assistant Steve Miller, Administrator Division of Land Susan L. Sylvester, Administrator Division of Water Ruthe E. Badger, Director South Central Regional Office Marjorie R. Devereaux, Water Leader _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 2001 Comprehensive Plan for the Yahara River/Lake Kegonsa Watershed: LR06 ii South Central Region Headquarters 3911 Fish Hatchery Road Fitchburg, Wisconsin 53711 608-275-3266 Fax: 608-275-3338 TDD: 608-275-3231 Susan J. Oshman, Land Leader Ken Johnson, Lower Rock Basin Water Team Leader Tim Galvin, Rock Basin Land Team Leader Scott McCallum, Governor Darrell Bazzell, Secretary Ruthe E. Badger, Regional Director Subject: Yahara Kegonsa Focus Watershed Report Dear Reader: This Yahara Kegonsa Focus Watershed Report is an appendix to the Rock River State of the Basin report, an "umbrella" report that will provide a broad perspective the resources of the entire Rock River Basin. The Yahara-Kegonsa Watershed Report provides detailed information about water and land resource conditions and emerging threats to these resources and a strategic direction for managing those issues. This focus watershed report is a starting point in our work to find out more about the rich land and water resources and to articulate a management approach that effectively merges citizen perception of issues with scientific understanding of resource condition. This report is part of a larger framework of data and information outlined in the Rock River State of the Basin Report, the Fish & Wildlife Habitat Plan 2001- 2006, priority watershed plans, sewer service area plans, and County Land and Water Plans. We hope this document furthers efforts to support diverse land uses and effective land and water strategies that maintain and enhance the biological and cultural strengths of the watershed. Read of the treasures this rapidly changing watershed has to offer -- enjoy its unique features -- and get informed and involved in activities that promote stewardship of its rich landscape and improved water quality. Sincerely, ________________________ ______________________ Ken Johnson, Tim Galvin Water Basin Leader Land Basin Leader _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 2001 Comprehensive Plan for the Yahara River/Lake Kegonsa Watershed: LR06 iii www.dnr.state.wi.us Quality Natural Resources Management www.wisconsin.gov Printed on Through Excellent Customer Service Recycled Paper Equal Opportunity Employer The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources provides equal opportunity in its employment, programs, services, and functions under an Affirmative Action Plan. If you have any questions, please write to Equal Opportunity Office, Department of Interior, Washington, D.C. 20240. This publication can be made available in alternative formats (large print, Braille, audio-tape, etc.) upon request. Please call Lisa Helmuth, 608-266-7768, for more information. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Box 7921 Madison, WI 53707 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Preparation of the Yahara Kegonsa Focus Watershed Report has been an effort of the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Lower Rock River Basin Team with support from its partnership group and DNR field and central office staff in the Divisions of Land and Water. Many individuals contributed information, data analysis or review. Their help is much appreciated. Primary Authors: Jennifer Bardeen and Coreen Ripp Contributors: Larry Benson, Steve Fix, Isa Woo, Ken Johnson, Mike Sorge, Tim Galvin, Alan Crossley, Bruce Moore, Jim Leverance, Lisa Helmuth, Janel Pike, Suzanne Wade, Dane County Regional Planning Commission, Rock River Partnership Team, the Friends of Lake Kegonsa, and interested citizens. This publication was partially funded by a 604(b) grant from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 2001 Comprehensive Plan for the Yahara River/Lake Kegonsa Watershed: LR06 iv TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ...............................................................................................................................................VIII LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................................................................VIII THE YAHARA RIVER/LAKE KEGONSA WATERSHED: LR06...................................................................... 1 IMPORTANT ISSUES............................................................................................................................................... 6 WETLANDS................................................................................................................................................................ 6 STREAMS AND RIVERS............................................................................................................................................... 6 NON-POINT SOURCE POLLUTION............................................................................................................................... 6 POINT SOURCE POLLUTION ....................................................................................................................................... 6 DAMS ........................................................................................................................................................................ 7 DRINKING WATER AND GROUNDWATER ................................................................................................................... 7 WILDLIFE AND FISHERIES.......................................................................................................................................... 7 GRANTS PROGRAM.................................................................................................................................................... 7 RECOMMENDATIONS............................................................................................................................................ 7 MAKING PEOPLE OUR STRENGTH ............................................................................................................................. 7 SUSTAINING ECOSYSTEMS......................................................................................................................................... 8 PROVIDING OUTDOOR RECREATION.......................................................................................................................... 9 PROTECTING PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY .............................................................................................................. 9 SURFACE WATER RESOURCES .......................................................................................................................... 9 YAHARA RIVER ......................................................................................................................................................... 9 LOWER MUD LAKE.................................................................................................................................................. 10 LOWER MUD LAKE WETLANDS............................................................................................................................... 11 KEENAN CREEK....................................................................................................................................................... 12 LAKE KEGONSA....................................................................................................................................................... 12 LITTLE DOOR CREEK............................................................................................................................................... 13 DOOR CREEK........................................................................................................................................................... 13 DOOR CREEK WETLANDS........................................................................................................................................ 14 LEUTEN CREEK ....................................................................................................................................................... 15 VIRGIN LAKE........................................................................................................................................................... 15 STOUGHTON MILLPOND .......................................................................................................................................... 15 GIBBS CREEK .......................................................................................................................................................... 15 GIBBS LAKE ...........................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Seasonal Shifts in the Relative Importance of Local Versus Upstream Sources of Phosphorus to Individual Lakes in a Chain
    Aquat Sci DOI 10.1007/s00027-016-0504-1 Aquatic Sciences RESEARCH ARTICLE Seasonal shifts in the relative importance of local versus upstream sources of phosphorus to individual lakes in a chain 1 2 Cory P. McDonald • Richard C. Lathrop Received: 29 September 2015 / Accepted: 27 August 2016 Ó Springer International Publishing 2016 Abstract Water quality in the Yahara chain of lakes in flushing lakes. Understanding the interaction of landscape southern Wisconsin has been degraded significantly since position, water residence time, and mixing regime can help European settlement of the region, primarily as a result of guide watershed management for water quality improve- anthropogenic nutrient inputs. While all four main lakes ments in lake chains. (Mendota, Monona, Waubesa, and Kegonsa) have under- gone eutrophication, elevated phosphorus and chlorophyll Keywords Lake chain Á Landscape limnology Á concentrations are particularly pronounced in the smaller Phosphorus Á Eutrophication lakes at the bottom of the chain (Waubesa and Kegonsa). Due to their short water residence times (2–3 months), these lakes are more responsive to seasonal variability in Introduction magnitude and source of phosphorus loading compared with the larger upstream lakes. In 2014, more than 80 % of Many regions of the world contain lake chains—lakes and the phosphorus load to Lake Waubesa passed through the rivers connected in a series of alternating lentic and lotic outlet of Lake Monona (situated immediately upstream). reaches (Jones 2010). The position of a lake within the However, between mid-May and late October when phos- regional flow system determines the relative importance of phorus concentrations in Lake Monona were reduced as a various hydrologic inputs to the lake (Kratz et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Simulation of the Effects of Operating Lakes Mendota, Monona, And
    Simulation of the Effects of Operating Lakes Mendota, Monona, and Waubesa, South-Central Wisconsin, as Multipurpose Reservoirs to Maintain Dry-Weather Flow By William R. Krug U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open-File Report 99-67 Prepared in cooperation with the DANE COUNTY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION WISCONSIN GEOLOGICAL AND NATURAL HISTORY SURVEY Middleton, Wisconsin 1999 USGS science for a changing world U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director The use of firm, trade, and brand names in this report is for identification purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey. For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services 8505 Research Way Box 25286 Middleton, Wl 53562-3586 Denver, CO 80225-0286 CONTENTS Abstract................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction.............................................................................................._^ 1 Purpose and scope....................................................................................................................................................... 2 Physical setting ..........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Stoughton Area Fuda
    STOUGHTON AREA FUDA Natural Resources Environmental Conditions Report | Natural Resources i Stoughton Area Future Urban Development Area Planning Study Environmental Conditions Report: Natural Resources Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 1 A. Physical Geography and Surface Geology .................................................................................. 3 1. Mineral Resources .................................................................................................................. 5 2. Steep Slopes and Woodlands ................................................................................................. 5 3. Soils ....................................................................................................................................... 14 a. Soils Underlain by Sandy Loam Glacial Till ........................................................................ 14 b. Soils Formed in Outwash Material.................................................................................... 15 c. Hydric Soils ........................................................................................................................ 15 d. Depth to Bedrock .............................................................................................................. 17 e. Development Site Analysis ................................................................................................ 21 f. Relative Infiltration
    [Show full text]
  • (G) Intergovernmental Cooperation Information
    TOWN OF VIENNA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MSA PROJECT 0120125 (G) Intergovernmental Cooperation Information 1. LOCAL AND REGIONAL PLAN COORDINATION Smart Growth Grant Joint Application (Westport, Springfield, Waunakee, Middleton) North Mendota Parkway Corridor Project (2002 – ongoing) U.S. Highway 12 Planning Project (2002) Dane County Farmland Preservation Plan (1981) Dane County Design Dane! (1998) Dane County Farmlands and Neighborhoods Plan (2000) Dane County Storm Water Management Plan and Ordinance (?) Madison Urban Area and Dane County Bicycle Transportation Plan (2000) Village of Waunakee Comprehensive Plan City of Middleton Comprehensive Plan Town of Springfield Comprehensive Plan Lower Rock River Basin Plan (DNR) (1998) Lower Rock River Water Quality Management Plan (DNR) (2001) • Lake Mendota-Yahara River Watershed Plan (DNR) • Six-Mile Creek and Pheasant Branch Watershed Plan (DNR) District 1 Six-Year Construction Project Plan (WisDOT) Dane County 10-Year Capital Projects Plan (2002) Town of Vienna Comprehensive Plan (1999) 2. INTERGOVERNMENTAL EFFORTS, AGREEMENTS AND RELATIONSHIPS There are several areas of intergovernmental cooperation between the Town of Vienna and its neighbors: • The Village of DeForest exercises extraterritorial zoning authority over the commercial development area near the I39/90/94 interchange, and jointly reviews development projects within the Town portion of this area through the ETZ committee. • The Town of Vienna provides water and sanitary services to its urban service areas through cooperation with the Village of DeForest. • There are informal growth management agreements with the Village of DeForest regarding annexation. • There are no agreements in place with either the Village of Waunakee or the Village of Dane. • The Town often works cooperatively with special districts such as the Waunakee and DeForest Public Libraries, as well as the Waunakee, DeForest, Poynette, and Lodi School Districts.
    [Show full text]
  • State of the Lakes Report Shows the Impact and Accelerate the Adoption of Effective Solutions
    WHAT CLOSED OUR BEACHES? LAKE BY LAKE REPORT A look at beach closure data and A breakdown of the state of each the cause of closures of the Yahara lakes PG. 43 (CENTER)SOTL PG. 45 - 49 Volunteer water quality monitor Greater Madison Lake Guide training| Summer on 2020Lake Mendota39 STATE OF THE LAKES WHAT HAPPENS ON THE LAND, IMPACTS THE LAKES View of Wisconsin State Capitol over Lake Mendota The Yahara River Watershed encompasses lakes Mendota, large number of beach closures. These conditions can be Monona, Wingra, Waubesa, and Kegonsa, and is home to a tied in part to wetter than normal weather. Large runoff fast-growing population and some of the most productive events, especially in the late winter when the ground was farmland in the United States. The intersection of frozen, contributed to the highest annual phosphorus productive farms and growing urban areas presents unique loading since the 1990s. Overall, phosphorus loading was challenges as we work to improve water quality. 2019 also saw 146 days of beach closures, or 39 more closure days than the long-term median (2010-2019). landscape. Many of the decisions we make on the land Cyanobacteria blooms were the primary cause of the 2019 impact the health of our lakes, from how we manage beach closures, and were likely made worse by invasive manure, to how much winter salt we use. zebra mussels. Zebra mussels (see page 26) consume At Clean Lakes Alliance, we focus on curbing the biggest cyanobacteria—which compete for the same nutrients and culprit of our water quality problems—phosphorus sunlight—largely untouched.
    [Show full text]
  • Predicting the Occurrence of Stunted Bluegill Populations
    PREDICTING THE OCCURRENCE OF STUNTED BLUEGILL POPULATIONS FROM WISCONSIN LAKE FEATURES By Jennifer Marie Hurt A Thesis Submitted in partial fulfillment of the Requirements of the degree MASTERS OF SCIENCE IN NATURAL RESOURCES (FISHERIES) College of Natural Resources UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN Stevens Point, Wisconsin December 2007 Al'l'ROVED BY'l'HECRADU:\TE COM\fiTTF.F. OF: D:. :\.fic,1ac. J. J-fo.u~n, Cormma::e Ch~1n:,~n l)rofcssor ofFish~i~ Collr,gr. ofN°a!'l.uat Resomcei !'j,') !ti,t, IL/ "I>" . -1,_~- Ji?.:v,,:>.- D,. R.ob"1t .'.:Holsm,:o A~,;i~la;1l Pn,feoesor ofCOilServatio."l Lat\• .:.nd '\','jltl!if~ n::lci(C of)1J~t1m1l ltr.SCl'l!J'Qa~ ---~v.1. .O..:."' ...r~/""/,;e.=_- ---­ ~nc:y A. N~t('\ Fishec jes D;llahH.:;c Coor,!:ruitc1J: ·~V!3co!lSjn De1>arlmc:11l orN;:.(urai Rc:;ou·.-r,r:5 ABSTRACT Bluegill stunting (poor growth and small size) is a fishery management problem in Wisconsin. Wisconsin has over 15,000 lakes and surveying each lake is not feasible due to lack of resources (personnel, money and time). Classifying lakes based on ecological and limnological similarities may provide a way to account for differences among lakes without having to survey all lakes. My objective was to classify stunted and non-stunted bluegill populations using features of Wisconsin lakes. Before I addressed my main objective, two subordinate objectives were addressed to establish data needs and define a stunted bluegill population for Wisconsin lakes. First, I determined if size selectivity of bluegills differed between electrofishing and Fyke netting in Wisconsin lakes.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Resources Natural Resources
    Natural Resources Natural Resources Introduction The City of Fitchburg geography was formed by the last of the glaciers, with the Milton Moraine generally dividing the City from southeast to northwest. The City has land in two of the major drainage basins of Dane County, each with two main watersheds within Fitchburg. A few large areas of sediment deposits form areas of little topographic variation, which provide good farmland, but also lead to pockets of closed basins. City water supply is dependant upon public wells into the deep Mount Simon and Eau Claire sandstones, making recharge of groundwater important to the long term viability of the community’s water supply. Woodlands are prevalent in parts of the City, particularly in areas of steeper topography. Physical Setting Physiography of Southern Wisconsin Soils The last Continental Glacier covered most of Wisconsin until 12,000 to 15,000 years ago. Fitchburg is between two distinct physical landscapes, the glaciated and driftless (unglaciated) areas. The glaciated area was covered with layers of sand, clay, and gravel left by the series of glacial advances. The driftless area shows no evidence of glaciers. The soils are typically well-drained. According to the Town of Fitchburg Development Plan (1978), “as a result of this location, the most dominant glacial features are two terminal moraines deposited by the Green Bay Lobe of the Continental Glacier.” Terminal moraines formed at the outer edge of the maximum extent of a glacier or glacial lobe when the ice melted and deposited the debris carried by the glacier. Two terminal moraines can be found within the City of Fitchburg.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Yahara Chain of Lakes Flooding Technical Work Group Report
    2018 Yahara Chain of Lakes Flooding Technical Work Group Report Photo of flooding in Tenney Park with Lake Mendota in the background. Courtesy of Rick Lange (Dane County Sheriff Office) performing drone footage of flooding in August 2018. February 1, 2019 Table of Contents 1.0 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................ 1 2.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 2 2.1 The Yahara Lakes and Flooding .......................................................................................................... 4 2.2 2018 Water Levels and Management ................................................................................................ 7 3.0 Technical Approach ................................................................................................................................ 9 3.1 INFOS Framework .............................................................................................................................. 9 3.2 INFOS Model Performance .............................................................................................................. 10 3.2.1 Comparison between Modeled and Observed Lake Levels ...................................................... 10 3.2.2 Comparison between Modeled and Observed River Water Surface Profiles ........................... 11 3.2.3 Comparison between Modeled
    [Show full text]
  • Geology and Ground-Water Resources of Dane County, Wisconsin
    Geology and Ground-Water Resources of Dane County, Wisconsin GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1779-U Prepared in cooperation with the University of Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey Geology and Ground -Water Resources of Dane County, Wisconsin By DENZEL R. CLINE CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE HYDROLOGY OF THE UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPEF 1779-U Prepared in cooperation with the University of Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1965 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director The U.S. Geological Survey Library catalog card for this publication appears after index. For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page Abstract____-_.___.___._____.___..__.__.._.. _ Ul Introduction._____________________________________________________ 2 Purpose and scope_____________________________________________ 2 Description of the area_________________________________________ 2 Physiography _____________________________________________ 3 Climate __________________________________________________ 4 Previous investigations._______-__--________-_-___---__-__---___ 5 Numbering system.__________________________________________ 5 Acknowledgments. ____________________________________________ 5 Geology._________________________________________________________ 7 Bedrock units and their water-yielding characteristics ______________ 11 Precambrian
    [Show full text]
  • Yahara Waterways Water Trail Guide – 2007 a Guide to the Environmental, Cultural and Historical Treasures of the Yahara Waterways
    Yahara Waterways Water Trail Guide – 2007 A guide to the environmental, cultural and historical treasures of the Yahara waterways. Land Shaped by the Glaciers For centuries waterways have been usable long-distance “trails and highways” prior to other forms of transportation. They played a key role in the exploration and settlement of North America. Early European settlers and Native Americans used the area for fishing, hunting and transpor- The Yahara Watershed in Dane County tation. Mail at one time was delivered by (showing sub-watersheds) boat on the Yahara Lakes. Now only some Yahara River & Lake Mendota of our major rivers are being used for Six Mile & Pheasant Branch Dane Creeks commercial transportation as railroads, Lake County Mendota Lake Lake Monona highways and air transportation carry Wingra Yahara River & Lake Monona Lake Waubesa Yahara River & Lake Kegonsa the majority of commercial traffic. The Lake Kegonsa waterway trails described within are for recreation, giving you a chance to enjoy the local blueways (paddling trails) and explore the vast array of wildlife, commune with nature, and learn about our area’s rich cultural heritage. The Yahara Watershed, or land area that drains into the Yahara River and lakes, covers 359 square miles, more than a quarter of Dane County. Much of the wa- tershed is farmed; however, the watershed also contains most of the urban land of the Madison metropolitan area. In addition, the Yahara Watershed includes Lake Wingra Yahara Waterways – Water Trail Guide 3 some of the largest wetlands that are left in Dane County. The lakes’ watershed includes all or parts of five cities, seven villages and sixteen towns, and is home to about 350,000 people.
    [Show full text]
  • An Environmental History of Lake Kegonsa; Perspectives On, and Perceptions Of, a Downstream Eutrophic Lake
    An Environmental History of Lake Kegonsa; Perspectives on, and Perceptions of, a Downstream Eutrophic Lake Benjamin Polchowski, Angela Baldocchi, and David Waro Abstract People have a negative perception of Lake Kegonsa. It has been called the red-headed, carp-filled, green, “scumsusceptible”, impaired, end of the line, phosphorus catching, step-lake (Golden 2014, 2-3). The environmental history of Lake Kegonsa shows that people have repeatedly used it as a natural resource for the last 12,000 years. Although the water quality has suffered during times of differing perspectives, Lake Kegonsa continues to have an important role as a social and recreational feature. There are stakeholders from the national to the local level involved in the management of Lake Kegonsa’s resources. This project calls out the error in perception with an interactive map illustrating positive perspectives regarding Lake Kegonsa’s importance. By comparing phosphorus, nitrogen, and chlorophyll data with corresponding water quality perspectives we begin to position ourselves to better assess lake health. Proper stewardship can ensure that Lake Kegonsa will continue to fill this important role. 1 Table of Contents Page 1. Introduction……………………………………………………………………………. 3 2. Site, Setting and Landscape………………………………………………………… 4 2.1 Glacial and Late Quaternary……………………………………………….. 5 2.2 Paleoindians………………………………………………………………... 6 2.3 Holocene History……………………………………………………………. 7 2.4 Mound Builders……………………………………………………………… 8 2.5 Ho-Chunk…………………………………………………………………….. 9 2.6 Euro American………………………………………………………………. 9 2.7 Today…………………………………………………………………………. 10 3. Water Quality………………………………………………………………………….. 11 3.1 Eutrophication……………………………………………………………….. 12 3.2 Water Clarity…………………………………………………………………. 12 3.3 Phosphorus…………………………………………………………………... 13 I. Sources…………………………………………………………………. 14 II. Complexities and Interactions……………………………………….. 15 3.4 Nitrogen………………………………………………………………………. 16 I. Sources…………………………………………………………………. 17 II.
    [Show full text]
  • Corn Moon Migrations: Ho-Chunk Belonging, Removal, and Return in the Early Nineteenth-Century Western Great Lakes
    Corn Moon Migrations: Ho-Chunk Belonging, Removal, and Return in the Early Nineteenth-Century Western Great Lakes By Libby Rose Tronnes A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (History) at the UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON 2017 Date of final oral examination: 12/13/2017 The dissertation is approved by the following members of the Final Oral Committee: Susan L. Johnson, Professor, History William Cronon, Professor, History John Hall, Associate Professor, History Stephen Kantrowitz, Professor, History Larry Nesper, Professor, Anthropology and American Indian Studies ProQuest Number:10690192 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. ProQuest 10690192 Published by ProQuest LLC ( 2017). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, MI 48106 - 1346 © Copyright Libby Rose Tronnes 2017 All Rights Reserved i Table of Contents Acknowledgements……………………………………………………………………………….ii Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………………..vi List of Figures …………………………………………………………………………..………viii
    [Show full text]