Tutela ODBORNÝ ČASOPIS SLOVENSKÉHO MÚZEA OCHRANY PRÍRODY a JASKYNIARSTVA V LIPTOVSKOM MIKULÁŠI 14 Číslo 2

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Tutela ODBORNÝ ČASOPIS SLOVENSKÉHO MÚZEA OCHRANY PRÍRODY a JASKYNIARSTVA V LIPTOVSKOM MIKULÁŠI 14 Číslo 2 tutela ODBORNÝ ČASOPIS SLOVENSKÉHO MÚZEA OCHRANY PRÍRODY A JASKYNIARSTVA V LIPTOVSKOM MIKULÁŠI 14 číslo 2 NATUR AE 2010 131 O B S A H Dana Šubová: Príspevok k rozšíreniu lišajníkov a machorastov Jánskej doliny (Liptovská Odborný časopis zameraný na pôvodné a originálne vedecké a odborné práce z oblasti kotlina) .................................................................................................................................................. 133 ochrany prírody, mapovania bio a abio zložky prírodného prostredia so zameraním na Anton Petrík – Jozef Šibík: Asociácia Festuco versicoloris-oreochloetum distichae – chránené územia a územia v systéme NATURA 2000 na Slovensku. vysokohorská tundra v Belianskych Tatrách ............................................................................. 147 Michal Slezák: Prvý záznam o výskyte asociácie Lunario-aceretum pseudoplatani v Štiavnických vrchoch ................................................................................................................... 155 Oto Majzlan: Význam agroštruktúr pre stabilitu diverzity koleopterocenóz .................. 161 Peter Gajdoš – Oto Majzlan: Pavúky (Araneae) pieskov v okolí Malaciek a Lakšárskej Novej Vsi ............................................................................................................................................ 173 Vladimír Straka – Ľubomír Panigaj – Dana Gabriková: Dvojkrídlovce (Diptera) lúčnych habitatov: existuje väzba na farbu kvetov? .............................................................................. 183 Jozef Lukáš: Vybrané skupiny blanokrídlovcov (Hymenoptera) prírodnej rezervácie Jaktar .................................................................................................................................................... 193 Ivan Mihál – Stanislav Korenko: Kosce (Arachnida, Opiliones) Starohorských vrchov (stredné Slovensko) ........................................................................................................................... 199 Lenka Hazuchová – Slavomír Stašiov: Myriapoda (Chilopoda, Diplopoda) Žiliny ......... 205 Pavel Ballo: Návrh pokračovanie reštitúcie svišťa vrchovského tatranského (Marmota marmota latirostris) zo Západných do Belianskych Tatier ....................................................... 213 Michal Baláž: Zimné sčítanie vodného vtáctva v oblasti Liptova v rokoch 2007 – 2010 ... 225 Milan Ballo – Peter Vravník: Priestorová a vertikálna distribúcia kamzíkov v Tatranskom národnom parku ................................................................................................................................ 233 Oto Majzlan: Faunistické príspevky zo Slovenska (Coleoptera) 5. .................................... 245 Ján Kliment: Botanická bibliografia Veľkej Fatry (Lišajníky, Machorasty, Papraďorasty a semenné rastliny, rastlinné spoločenstvá) 1. Súpis prác do roku 1960 ............................... 251 Editor: doc. RNDr. Dana Šubová, CSc. Výkonný redaktor: RNDr. Dagmar Lepišová Predseda redakčnej rady: prof. RNDr. Oto Majzlan, PhD. Redakčná rada: prof. RNDr. Peter Bitušík, CSc., RNDr. Miroslav Fulín, CSc., RNDr. Ľudovít Gaál, PhD., doc. RNDr. Ľubomír Panigaj, CSc., RNDr. Jozef Radúch, RNDr. Vladimír Straka, Ing. Jozef Školek, CSc., prof. RNDr. Jozef Šteffek, CSc., doc. RNDr. Dana Šubová, CSc., Ing. Ján Tomaškin, PhD., Ing. Kristína Urbanová, RNDr. Viktória Urbanová, CSc. © Slovenské múzeum ochrany prírody a jaskyniarstva v Liptovskom Mikuláši, 2010 ISSN 1336-7609 130 131 C O N T E N T NATURAE TUTELA 14/2 133 – 146 LIPTOVSKÝ MIKULÁŠ 2010 Dana Šubová: Contribution to range of (Lichens) and (Bryophytes) in the Jánska Valley, PRÍSPEVOK K ROZŠÍRENIU LIŠAJNÍKOV A MACHORASTOV the Liptov Basin .............................................................................................................................. 133 Anton Petrík – Jozef Šibík: The association Festuco versicoloris-Oreochloetum distichae JÁNSKEJ DOLINY (LIPTOVSKÁ KOTLINA) – an alpine tundra in the Belianske Tatry Mts. ........................................................................... 147 DANA ŠUBOVÁ Michal Slezák: First record of association Lunario-Aceretum pseudoplatani from the Štiavnické vrchy Mts. ...................................................................................................................... 155 D. Šubová: Contribution to range of (Lichens) and (Bryophytes) in the Jánska Valley, the Oto Majzlan: A role of agroctructures in diversity of beetle (Coleopterea) assemblages .... 161 Liptov Basin Peter Gajdoš – Oto Majzlan: Spiders (Araneae) on sands in the surroundings of Malacky Abstract: The contribution summarizes results of distribution of Lichens and Bryophytes and Lakšárska Nová Ves ................................................................................................................ 173 species collected during 2001 – 2003 on 13 localities in the Jánska Valley, and adjacent areas mostly from surroundings of cave entrances. Items were collected by D. Šubová, 90 Lichens Vladimír Straka – Ľubomír Panigaj – Dana Gabriková: True flies (Diptera) of meadows: species were determined by I. Pišút, and 64 Bryophytes species (16 Hepatica species and 48 there is a relationship to the color of flowers? ......................................................................... 183 Musci species) by K. Mišíková. Items were processed by drying, and they are deposited in Jozef Lukáš: Chosen groups of Hymenoptera in nature reserve Jaktar ................................ 193 the collection fund of the Slovak Museum of Nature Protection and Speleology in Liptovský Ivan Mihál – Stanislav Korenko: Harvestmen (Arachnida, Opiliones) of the Starohorské Mikuláš, some of them in the collection fund of the Natural History Museum of the Slovak National Museum in Bratislava as well. vrchy mountains (Central Slovakia) ................................................................................................ 199 Key words: Lichens, Bryophytes, Red List of Plants and Animals of Slovak Natural Lenka Hazuchová – Slavomír Stašiov: Myriapoda (Chilopoda, Diplopoda) of the Žilina Conservation, Jánska Valley, cave (Slovakia) ............................................................................................................................................. 205 Pavel Ballo: Proposal for the continuation of the restitution of the Tatra mountain ÚVOD marmot during the 2010 season from the Západné Tatry Mts. to the Belianske Tatry Mts. 213 V priebehu rokov 2000 až 2003 sme zozbierali v Jánskej doline na 9 lokalitách lišajníky Michal Baláž: Winter waterbird census in the Liptov area in the seasons 2007 – 2010 ... 225 a na 12 lokalitách machorasty. Zber bol orientovaný najmä na tesnú blízkosť niekoľkých Milan Ballo – Peter Vravník: Space and vertical distribution of chamois in the Tatra jaskýň Jánskej doliny a priľahlých oblastí. Napriek svojej známosti, atraktivite a dostupnosti mountains (three model valleys) .................................................................................................... 233 oblasť nepatrí medzi územia, ktoré boli floristicky úplne zdokumentované. Z minulosti je Oto Majzlan: Faunistic notes on beetles (Coleoptera) 5. from Slovakia ................................ 245 známych len niekoľko poznámok o kvetene doliny (Fott, 1930; Trapl, 1930, In: Burkovský, Ján Kliment: Botanical bibliography of the Veľká Fatra Mts (lichens, bryophytes, ferns 2004), súborné dielo o výskyte lišajníkov v Jánskej doline (Suza, 1935, In: Burkovský, 2004). and flowering plants, plant communities). 1. The list of publications till the 1960 ......... 251 Väčšiu pozornosť venoval územiu (Sillinger, 1933, In: Burkovský, 2004) a z lesníckeho h ľa d i s k a ( Randuška, Baďura, 1977, In: Burkovský, 2004). V rokoch 1992 – 1993 vykonávala pre potreby Správy NAPANT floristický inventarizačný výskum RNDr. Ingrid Turisová (In: Burkovský, 2004). Komplexná bryoflóra Nízkych Tatier je zhrnutá v bulletine Slovenskej botanickej spoločnosti (roč. 21, 1999) venovanom Ladislavovi Pokludovi. Napriek tomu, že územie Jánskej doliny je relatívne dobre preskúmané v inventarizácii jeho flóry sa ešte stále nachádzajú biele miesta. Výsledky inventarizácie druhov z tohto územia je preto možné považovať za príspevok k ich postupnému vyplňovaniu. METODIKA Výber lokalít v Jánskej doline a priľahlých oblastiach významných z krasového pohľadu bol urobený so zámerom zmapovania výskytu druhov pozdĺž doliny až do ďumbierskeho kotla na východnej aj západnej strane. Krasové lokality, resp. okolie vstupov do významnejších jaskýň boli zvolené z dôvodu známej lokalizácie vchodov do jaskýň, ale aj z dôvodu zdôraznenia významu epilitických a endolitických lišajníkov v procesoch zvetrávania krasovej horniny, kedy lišajníky otvárajú prístup povrchovej vody do jaskynných priestorov (tzv. autochtónnej vody), ktorá je hlavným faktorom pri vytváraní krasovej výzdoby. Okrem lokalít, kde boli zozbierané vzorky lišajníkov, s výnimkou Ohnišťa, sme pre mapovanie machorastov ešte zaradili lokality Biela dolinka, Poschodový potok, Vyvieračka v Medzibrodí a Kanálová jaskyňa. Z hľadiska významu sú machorasty všeobecne dôležité pre udržanie priaznivých hydrologických pomerov daného územia čo je veľmi významné aj v krasovej oblasti. 132 133 Mikroorganizmy, ktoré tu žijú, obohacujú vodu o CO2, ktorá potom prechodom cez krasovú horninu ju rozpúšťa a vyzráža sa opäť vo forme sintrovej výplne. Zozbieraný materiál bol spracovaný vysušením. Každá vzorka bola rozdelená na základnú a
Recommended publications
  • Pohoria Burda Na Dostupných Historických Mapách Je Aj Cieľom Tohto Príspevku
    OCHRANA PRÍRODY NATURE CONSERVATION 27 / 2016 OCHRANA PRÍRODY NATURE CONSERVATION 27 / 2016 Štátna ochrana prírody Slovenskej republiky Banská Bystrica Redakčná rada: prof. Dr. Ing. Viliam Pichler doc. RNDr. Ingrid Turisová, PhD. Mgr. Michal Adamec RNDr. Ján Kadlečík Ing. Marta Mútňanová RNDr. Katarína Králiková Recenzenti čísla: RNDr. Michal Ambros, PhD. Mgr. Peter Puchala, PhD. Ing. Jerguš Tesák doc. RNDr. Ingrid Turisová, PhD. Zostavil: RNDr. Katarína Králiková Jayzková korektúra: Mgr. Olga Majerová Grafická úprava: Ing. Viktória Ihringová Vydala: Štátna ochrana prírody Slovenskej republiky Banská Bystrica v roku 2016 Vydávané v elektronickej verzii Adresa redakcie: ŠOP SR, Tajovského 28B, 974 01 Banská Bystrica tel.: 048/413 66 61, e-mail: [email protected] ISSN: 2453-8183 Uzávierka predkladania príspevkov do nasledujúceho čísla (28): 30.9.2016. 2 \ Ochrana prírody, 27/2016 OCHRANA PRÍRODY INŠTRUKCIE PRE AUTOROV Vedecký časopis je zameraný najmä na publikovanie pôvodných vedeckých a odborných prác, recenzií a krátkych správ z ochrany prírody a krajiny, resp. z ochranárskej biológie, prioritne na Slovensku. Príspevky sú publikované v slovenskom, príp. českom jazyku s anglickým súhrnom, príp. v anglickom jazyku so slovenským (českým) súhrnom. Členenie príspevku 1) názov príspevku 2) neskrátené meno autora, adresa autora (vrátane adresy elektronickej pošty) 3) názov príspevku, abstrakt a kľúčové slová v anglickom jazyku 4) úvod, metodika, výsledky, diskusia, záver, literatúra Ilustrácie (obrázky, tabuľky, náčrty, mapky, mapy, grafy, fotografie) • minimálne rozlíšenie 1200 x 800 pixelov, rozlíšenie 300 dpi (digitálna fotografia má väčšinou 72 dpi) • každá ilustrácia bude uložená v samostatnom súbore (jpg, tif, bmp…) • používajte kilometrovú mierku, nie číselnú • mapy vytvorené v ArcView je nutné vyexportovať do formátov tif, jpg,..
    [Show full text]
  • ST2176 Lichfields H3.626.87MB
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¶V'UDIW6WUDWHJLF/DQG5HYLHZ 6/5 SXEOLVKHGLQ 0DUFK )RU VLWH %& WKH 6/5 ZRXOG KDYH PHGLXP LPSDFW RQ WKH ORFDO URDG QHWZRUN DQG VRPH PLWLJDWLRQZRXOGEHQHFHVVDU\,WFRQFOXGHGWKDWWKHVLWHLVSRWHQWLDOO\VXLWDEOHIRUQHZKRPHV
    [Show full text]
  • R. P. LANE (Department of Entomology), British Museum (Natural History), London SW7 the Diptera of Lundy Have Been Poorly Studied in the Past
    Swallow 3 Spotted Flytcatcher 28 *Jackdaw I Pied Flycatcher 5 Blue Tit I Dunnock 2 Wren 2 Meadow Pipit 10 Song Thrush 7 Pied Wagtail 4 Redwing 4 Woodchat Shrike 1 Blackbird 60 Red-backed Shrike 1 Stonechat 2 Starling 15 Redstart 7 Greenfinch 5 Black Redstart I Goldfinch 1 Robin I9 Linnet 8 Grasshopper Warbler 2 Chaffinch 47 Reed Warbler 1 House Sparrow 16 Sedge Warbler 14 *Jackdaw is new to the Lundy ringing list. RECOVERIES OF RINGED BIRDS Guillemot GM I9384 ringed 5.6.67 adult found dead Eastbourne 4.12.76. Guillemot GP 95566 ringed 29.6.73 pullus found dead Woolacombe, Devon 8.6.77 Starling XA 92903 ringed 20.8.76 found dead Werl, West Holtun, West Germany 7.10.77 Willow Warbler 836473 ringed 14.4.77 controlled Portland, Dorset 19.8.77 Linnet KC09559 ringed 20.9.76 controlled St Agnes, Scilly 20.4.77 RINGED STRANGERS ON LUNDY Manx Shearwater F.S 92490 ringed 4.9.74 pullus Skokholm, dead Lundy s. Light 13.5.77 Blackbird 3250.062 ringed 8.9.75 FG Eksel, Belgium, dead Lundy 16.1.77 Willow Warbler 993.086 ringed 19.4.76 adult Calf of Man controlled Lundy 6.4.77 THE DIPTERA (TWO-WINGED FLffiS) OF LUNDY ISLAND R. P. LANE (Department of Entomology), British Museum (Natural History), London SW7 The Diptera of Lundy have been poorly studied in the past. Therefore, it is hoped that the production of an annotated checklist, giving an indication of the habits and general distribution of the species recorded will encourage other entomologists to take an interest in the Diptera of Lundy.
    [Show full text]
  • Redescriptions of Two Closely Resembling Linnaemya Species (Insecta: Diptera: Tachinidae) New to Korea
    Korean J. Syst. Zool. Vol. 24, No. 3: 307-313, November 2008 Redescriptions of Two Closely Resembling Linnaemya Species (Insecta: Diptera: Tachinidae) New to Korea Jong-Su Lim and Ho-Yeon Han* Division of Biological Science and Technology, Yonsei University, Wonju-si, Gangwon-do 220-710, Korea ABSTRACT In the process of revising the tachinid genus Linnaemya Robineau-Desvoidy in Korea, we have discovered two species for the first time in Korea. They closely resemble each other and need to be identified with caution. We here provide detailed redescriptions and illustrations with their diagnostic characters indicated. Lin- naemya atriventris can be distinguished from L. hirtipennis by the combination of the following charac- teristics: 1) abdomen black in ground color; 2) wing vein R1 without setulose; 3) hypandrium without secon- dary posterior lobe; 4) male with antero-basal 1/3 of flagellomere 1 distinctly swollen; and 5) postgonite very weakly curved dorsally. Key words: Taxonomy, Diptera, Tachinidae, Linnaemyiini, Linnaemya, Korea INTRODUCTION Wood (1987), but those of male terminalia follow Shima (1986). In addition, we used the following ten ratios (modi- Linnaemya Robineau-Desvoidy is one of the largest genera fied from Han and Norrbom, 2005): vertex-head ratio (ver- of the subfamily Tachininae with worldwide distribution in- tex width/head width); eye ratio (shortest eye diameter/ cluding 125 nominal species (Crosskey, 1980; Herting, longest eye diameter); frons-head ratio (narrowest width of 1984; Shima, 1986). This genus can be
    [Show full text]
  • Nomenclatural Studies Toward a World List of Diptera Genus-Group Names
    Nomenclatural studies toward a world list of Diptera genus-group names. Part V Pierre-Justin-Marie Macquart Evenhuis, Neal L.; Pape, Thomas; Pont, Adrian C. DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4172.1.1 Publication date: 2016 Document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Document license: CC BY Citation for published version (APA): Evenhuis, N. L., Pape, T., & Pont, A. C. (2016). Nomenclatural studies toward a world list of Diptera genus- group names. Part V: Pierre-Justin-Marie Macquart. Magnolia Press. Zootaxa Vol. 4172 No. 1 https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4172.1.1 Download date: 02. Oct. 2021 Zootaxa 4172 (1): 001–211 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Monograph ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2016 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4172.1.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:22128906-32FA-4A80-85D6-10F114E81A7B ZOOTAXA 4172 Nomenclatural Studies Toward a World List of Diptera Genus-Group Names. Part V: Pierre-Justin-Marie Macquart NEAL L. EVENHUIS1, THOMAS PAPE2 & ADRIAN C. PONT3 1 J. Linsley Gressitt Center for Entomological Research, Bishop Museum, 1525 Bernice Street, Honolulu, Hawaii 96817-2704, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Natural History Museum of Denmark, Universitetsparken 15, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark. E-mail: [email protected] 3Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PW, UK. E-mail: [email protected] Magnolia Press Auckland, New Zealand Accepted by D. Whitmore: 15 Aug. 2016; published: 30 Sept. 2016 Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 NEAL L.
    [Show full text]
  • Ad Hoc Referees Committee for This Issue Thomas Dirnböck
    COMITATO DI REVISIONE PER QUESTO NUMERO – Ad hoc referees committee for this issue Thomas Dirnböck Umweltbundesamt GmbH Studien & Beratung II, Spittelauer Lände 5, 1090 Wien, Austria Marco Kovac Slovenian Forestry Institute, Vecna pot 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenija Susanna Nocentini Università degli Studi di Firenze, DISTAF, Via S. Bonaventura 13, 50145 Firenze Ralf Ohlemueller Department of Biology, University of York, PO Box 373, York YO10 5YW, UK Sandro Pignatti Orto Botanico di Roma, Dipartimento di Biologia Vegetale, L.go Cristina di Svezia, 24, 00165 Roma Stergios Pirintsos Department of Biology, University of Crete, P.O.Box 2208, 71409 Heraklion, Greece Matthias Plattner Hintermann & Weber AG, Oeko-Logische Beratung Planung Forschung, Hauptstrasse 52, CH-4153 Reinach Basel Arne Pommerening School of Agricultural & Forest Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, DU/ UK Roberto Scotti Università degli Studi di Sassari, DESA, Nuoro branch, Via C. Colombo 1, 08100 Nuoro Franz Starlinger Forstliche Bundesversuchsanstalt Wien, A 1131 Vienna, Austria Silvia Stofer Eidgenössische Forschungsanstalt für Wald, Schnee und Landschaft – WSL, Zürcherstrasse 111, CH-8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland Norman Woodley Systematic Entomology Lab-USDA , c/o Smithsonian Institution NHB-168 , O Box 37012 Washington, DC 20013-7012 CURATORI DI QUESTO NUMERO – Editors Marco Ferretti, Bruno Petriccione, Gianfranco Fabbio, Filippo Bussotti EDITORE – Publisher C.R.A. - Istituto Sperimentale per la Selvicoltura Viale Santa Margherita, 80 – 52100 Arezzo Tel.. ++39 0575 353021; Fax. ++39 0575 353490; E-mail:[email protected] Volume 30, Supplemento 2 - 2006 LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS C.R.A.A - ISTITUTO N SPERIMENTALE N A PER LA LSELVICOLTURA I (in alphabetic order) Allegrini, M. C.
    [Show full text]
  • KEYS Tú the ETHIOPIAJ.'F TACHINIDAE-III MACQUARTIINAE by the Late F
    313 KEYS Tú THE ETHIOPIAJ.'f TACHINIDAE-III MACQUARTIINAE BY The late F. 1. VAN ENIDEN Commonwealth Institute of Entomology (Accepted 12th May, 1959) (With 11 figures in the text) CüNTENTS , Page Introduction 313 Abhreviations 314 Deñnition of the subfamily Macquartiinae 315 Biology of tha Ethiopian Macquartiinae 315 Key ta the tribes of Ethiopian Macquartiinae 317 Key ta tbe sub-tribes of Echinornyini 320 l. :Macqaartiini 320 2. Wagneriini 332 3. Campyiochaetini 350 4. Helocerini 353 5. Nemoraeini 358 6. Acemyini 368 7. Gennariini 371 8. Thelairini 372 9. Minthoini 377 10. Leskiini 384 11. Echinornyini 402 a. Ernestiina 402 b. Linnaernyina. 407 c. Echinomyina 467 References 486 [The present report was completed by DI' van Ernden with the exception of Olle descrip­ tion, of the figures (to which, however, he had made reference in the appropriate places) and of the section dealing with the biology of the group. The biological data have kindly been summarised by DI' S. V. Peris, of the Instituto de Edafología, Madrid, and the bibliographical references at the end of the paper were provided to support this parto It had been van Emden's intention to inelude a paragraph of thanks in the íntro• duction. This was not completed, but acknowledgments of help received are given at varíous places in the text, and on his behalí thanks are bere tendered to the authoritie" of the British Museum for the facilities which they have so kindly afforded. The present annotator is responsible fol' the deseription of J.l1arshallornyia and its single species, for the text figures and for following the original orthography of the generie names Acemya, Linnaemya and Echinornya.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the Status of Larger Brachycera Flies of Great Britain
    Natural England Commissioned Report NECR192 A review of the status of Larger Brachycera flies of Great Britain Acroceridae, Asilidae, Athericidae Bombyliidae, Rhagionidae, Scenopinidae, Stratiomyidae, Tabanidae, Therevidae, Xylomyidae. Species Status No.29 First published 30th August 2017 www.gov.uk/natural -england Foreword Natural England commission a range of reports from external contractors to provide evidence and advice to assist us in delivering our duties. The views in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of Natural England. Background Making good decisions to conserve species This report should be cited as: should primarily be based upon an objective process of determining the degree of threat to DRAKE, C.M. 2017. A review of the status of the survival of a species. The recognised Larger Brachycera flies of Great Britain - international approach to undertaking this is by Species Status No.29. Natural England assigning the species to one of the IUCN threat Commissioned Reports, Number192. categories. This report was commissioned to update the threat status of Larger Brachycera flies last undertaken in 1991, using a more modern IUCN methodology for assessing threat. Reviews for other invertebrate groups will follow. Natural England Project Manager - David Heaver, Senior Invertebrate Specialist [email protected] Contractor - C.M Drake Keywords - Larger Brachycera flies, invertebrates, red list, IUCN, status reviews, IUCN threat categories, GB rarity status Further information This report can be downloaded from the Natural England website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/natural-england. For information on Natural England publications contact the Natural England Enquiry Service on 0300 060 3900 or e-mail [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Orchids. a History of Discovery, Lust and Wealth
    Scientific Papers. Series B, Horticulture. Vol. LXIV, No. 1, 2020 Print ISSN 2285-5653, CD-ROM ISSN 2285-5661, Online ISSN 2286-1580, ISSN-L 2285-5653 A HISTORY OF ORCHIDS. A HISTORY OF DISCOVERY, LUST AND WEALTH Nora Eugenia D. G. ANGHELESCU1, Annie BYGRAVE2, Mihaela I. GEORGESCU1, Sorina A. PETRA1, Florin TOMA1 1University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Bucharest, 59 Mărăști Blvd, District 1, Bucharest, Romania 2Self-employed, London, UK Corresponding author email: [email protected] Abstract Orchidaceae is the second largest families of flowering plants. There are approximately 900 orchid genera comprising between 28,000-32,000 species of orchids. The relationship between orchids and mankind is complex. The history of orchids’ discovery goes hand in hand with the history of humanity, encompassing discovery and adventure, witchcraft and magic, symbolism and occultism, addiction and sacrifice, lust and wealth. Historically, the Chinese were the first to cultivate orchids as medicinal plants, more than 4000 years ago. Gradually, records about orchids spread, reaching the Middle East and Europe. Around 300 B.C., Theophrastus named them for the first time orkhis. In 1737, Carl Linnaeus first used the word Orchidaceae to designate plants with similar features. The family name, Orchidaceae was fully established in 1789, by Antoine Laurent de Jussieu. In 1862, Charles Darwin published the first edition of his book, Fertilisation of Orchids. Darwin considered the adaptations of orchid flowers to their animal pollinators as being among the best examples of his idea of evolution through natural selection. Orchidology was on its way. During the 18th and the 19th centuries, orchids generated the notorious Orchid Fever where orchid-hunters turned the search for orchids into a frantic and obsessive hunt.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Biodiversity Snapshot. Isle of Man Appendices
    UK Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies: 2011 Biodiversity snapshot. Isle of Man: Appendices. Author: Elizabeth Charter Principal Biodiversity Officer (Strategy and Advocacy). Department of Environment, Food and Agriculture, Isle of man. More information available at: www.gov.im/defa/ This section includes a series of appendices that provide additional information relating to that provided in the Isle of Man chapter of the publication: UK Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies: 2011 Biodiversity snapshot. All information relating to the Isle or Man is available at http://jncc.defra.gov.uk/page-5819 The entire publication is available for download at http://jncc.defra.gov.uk/page-5821 1 Table of Contents Appendix 1: Multilateral Environmental Agreements ..................................................................... 3 Appendix 2 National Wildife Legislation ......................................................................................... 5 Appendix 3: Protected Areas .......................................................................................................... 6 Appendix 4: Institutional Arrangements ........................................................................................ 10 Appendix 5: Research priorities .................................................................................................... 13 Appendix 6 Ecosystem/habitats ................................................................................................... 14 Appendix 7: Species ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief Nomenclatural Review of Genera and Tribes in Theaceae Linda M
    Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany Volume 24 | Issue 1 Article 8 2007 A Brief Nomenclatural Review of Genera and Tribes in Theaceae Linda M. Prince Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, Claremont, California Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso Part of the Botany Commons, and the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Recommended Citation Prince, Linda M. (2007) "A Brief Nomenclatural Review of Genera and Tribes in Theaceae," Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: Vol. 24: Iss. 1, Article 8. Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol24/iss1/8 Aliso 24, pp. 105–121 ᭧ 2007, Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden A BRIEF NOMENCLATURAL REVIEW OF GENERA AND TRIBES IN THEACEAE LINDA M. PRINCE Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, 1500 North College Ave., Claremont, California 91711-3157, USA ([email protected]) ABSTRACT The angiosperm family Theaceae has been investigated extensively with a rich publication record of anatomical, cytological, paleontological, and palynological data analyses and interpretation. Recent developmental and molecular data sets and the application of cladistic analytical methods support dramatic changes in circumscription at the familial, tribal, and generic levels. Growing interest in the family outside the taxonomic and systematic fields warrants a brief review of the recent nomenclatural history (mainly 20th century), some of the classification systems currently in use, and an explanation of which data support various classification schemes. An abridged bibliography with critical nomen- clatural references is provided. Key words: anatomy, classification, morphology, nomenclature, systematics, Theaceae. INTRODUCTION acters that were restricted to the family and could be used to circumscribe it.
    [Show full text]
  • The Orkney Local Biodiversity Action Plan 2013-2016 and Appendices
    Contents Page Section 1 Introduction 4 1.1 Biodiversity action in Orkney – general outline of the Plan 6 1.2 Biodiversity Action Planning - the international and national contexts 6 • The Scottish Biodiversity Strategy 1.3 Recent developments in environmental legislation 8 • The Marine (Scotland) Act 2010 • The Wildlife and Natural Environment (Scotland) Act 2011 • The Climate Change (Scotland) Act 2009 1.4 Biodiversity and the Local Authority Planning System 12 • The Orkney Local Development Plan 2012-2017 1.5 Community Planning 13 1.6 River Basin Management Planning 13 1.7 Biodiversity and rural development policy 14 • The Common Agricultural Policy • Scotland Rural Development Programme 2007-2013 1.8 Other relevant national publications 15 • Scotland’s Climate Change Adaptation Framework • Scotland’s Land Use Strategy • The Scottish Soil Framework 1.9 Links with the Orkney Biodiversity Records Centre 16 Section 2 Selection of the Ten Habitats for Inclusion in the Orkney Biodiversity Action Plan 2013-2016 17 1 • Lowland fens 19 2 • Basin bog 27 3 • Eutrophic standing waters 33 4 • Mesotrophic lochs 41 5 • Ponds and milldams 47 6 • Burns and canalized burns 53 7 • Coastal sand dunes and links 60 8 • Aeolianite 70 9 • Coastal vegetated shingle 74 10 • Intertidal Underboulder Communities 80 Appendix I Species considered to be of conservation concern in Orkney Appendix II BAP habitats found in Orkney Appendix III The Aichi targets and goals 3 Orkney Local Biodiversity Action Plan 2013-2016 Section 1 – Introduction What is biodiversity? a) Consider natural systems – by using The term ‘biodiversity’ means, quite simply, knowledge of interactions in nature and how the variety of species and genetic varieties ecosystems function.
    [Show full text]