LOKAYUKTA HARYANA ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE YEAR 2018-2019 (01.04.2018 TO 31.03.2019) After I had taken oath as Lokayukta of Haryana on 19th July, 2016, this is my 3rd Annual Report on the functioning of Lokayukta Institution for the aforesaid period under report being submitted to the Hon’ble Governor of Haryana as required under Section 17 (3) of the Haryana Lokayukta Act, 2002. Lokayuktas have been unearthing corruption cases, recommending measures to redress grievances of the people and above all, acting as a much needed safety valve to release the bottled up pressure of aggrieved citizens, which, if allowed to accumulate, would put a question mark on the credibility of our administrative apparatus. The very existence of a Lokayukta helps to generate a feeling of assurance among the public at large, that they have a mechanism to fall back upon when faced with corrupt public servants. Lokayukta investigates cases of corruption, where substantiated, recommend action. It is a great check on corruption, brings about transparency in the system, and makes administrative machinery citizen friendly. His functions largely depend upon jurisdiction vested in him and facilities provided 2 for taking cognizance of citizens’ grievances promptly, deftly and expeditiously through simple, informal mechanism devoid of technicalities. Corruption is internationally recognized a major problem, capable of endangering stability and security of society, threatening social, economic and political development and undermining the values of democracy and morality. It has assumed alarming proportions resultantly public funds going into private hands leading to enrichment of bribe givers and bribe takers. Corruption, inefficiency, delays and insensitivity to people’s grievances can be identified key problems besetting the nation. Citizens bitterly feel the distance that separates them from the decision makers. This distance, makes them feel abandoned or even rejected and they eventually lose interest in public matters and become marginalized. Corruption does not mean only taking bribe. It is used in a much larger sense, "Conduct", which is morally unsound and debased. It includes conduct which is blame-worthy or improper (See Dr. S. Dutt Vs State of UP AIR 1966 SC 523). Corruption and mal- administration are like twin sisters each acts in complement to the other. Corruption has ruined Empires. After completion of his book, "The Decline of Rome Empire" Edward Gibbon, the 3 Great Historian, Writer and Philosopher was asked to reply in one word the reason for the decline Roman Empire, he remarked "Corruption." Corruption in a civilized society, is described "disease like cancer & rdquo, which if not detected in time is sure to malignise the polity of a country leading to disastrous consequences." Pylee points out: "Corruption at the bureaucratic level operated like a subterranean monster, aiding, abetting and colluding with the political bosses. Service to the public has long given way to careerism with a work culture of 19th century aristocracy dealing with the citizens as ‘subjects.’ Burke cautioned, “Among people, generally corrupt, liberty cannot last long". Hon’ble Supreme Court of India also said that corruption in a civilized society is a disease like cancer and if not detected in time, will malignise the polity of the country leading to disastrous consequence. It is like plague, it is contagious and if not controlled, spreads like a fire in a jungle. Its virus is compared with HIV leading to AIDS, being incurable (See State of MP & Others Vs Ram Singh (2000) 5 SCC 88, and State of Andhra Pradesh Vs V. Vasudeva Rao 2003 (9) Scale 569). Corruption in public life is a gross violation of human rights. It is 4 anti-people, anti-development, and anti-national. Rampant corruption is major national malady. It is the single big factor retarding the progress of our country, responsible for millions to live below poverty line despite astronomical amount being spent on development. It is garbage which is required to be removed otherwise it would hamper development of the country and bring bad name to the nation. Hon’ble Supreme Court observed in “Lucknow Development Authority Vs M.K. Gupta (AIR 1994 SC 787): "...Harassment of a common man by public authorities is socially abhorring and legally impermissible. It may harm him personally but the injury to society is far more grievous. Crime and corruption thrive and prosper in the society due to lack of public resistance. Nothing is more damaging than the feeling of helplessness. An ordinary citizen instead of complaining and fighting succumbs to the pressure of undesirable functioning in offices instead of standing against it...." An honest man is the noblest wok of God – Pope. When men are pure, laws are useless; when men are corrupt, laws are broken – Benjamin Disraeli. Citizens realize that corruption is dominant factor keeping India a poor country, therefore, 5 delaying march towards prosperity. A citizen faces corruption practically at every level and every sector of life. Corruption is anti-national, anti-poor, anti-economic development and anti- life. Rampant corruption is a major national malady. The Central Government as well as the State Governments are anxious to eradicate it because there is realization that it is a great hurdle on the path of progress because out of the huge plan outlays, very little goes to the people whose upliftment is essential for ushering the egalitarian society. This apart, it stalls the pace of development in other sectors too. It is, therefore, considered necessary to eradicate corruption with an iron hand otherwise march towards progress and prosperity would be delayed considerably. Why can’t it be eradicated when the number of persons indulging in corruption is hardly two percent of the total population of the country. In its widest connotation corruption includes improper and selfish exercise of power and influence attached to a public office due to the special position one occupies in public life. Developing countries like India, face this problem, as a result, it assumes status of mega industry, where some people thrive at the cost of public exchequer resultantly imparting the developmental activities of the State. The United Nations 6 Convention against corruption (2003) signed/ratified by the member countries to deal firmly with corruption. Secretary General stressed that corruption violates the socio-economic human rights of the people especially in the developing countries because funds meant for roads, wells, hospital, schools and other basic necessities are siphoned off and deposited in safe havens abroad. Inaugurating two day National Seminar on "Access to Justice", organized by the Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association, in association with the United Nations Development Programme, the Former President of India, Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam said that with the rising all-round awareness and a demand for clean and corruption-free public life, the burning issue of probity in public life was increasingly coming into focus. Conduct and behavior in public life are, like never before, under very close scrutiny. It was essential that the three pillars of democracy-Legislature, Judiciary and Executive-are strong in structure, pure in form and un-corrupted and un- blemished in conduct. Consequently, understanding the menace of corruption and urgent necessity to deal with it in the context of existing scenario, public outcry, warning by transparency International, 7 other NGOs and media, Government is attempting to eradicate it by taking steps for sometime past. The first Administrative Reforms Commission, headed by Late Shri Morarji Desai studied the causes for the steep deterioration in all areas of administration, Central and States and recommended remedial measures. In its report (1966) suggested, among other things, appointment of Lokpal at the Centre and Lokayukta at the State. Second Administrative Reforms Commission, headed by Shri Veerappa Moily, deliberated extensively for elimination of corruption in the administration and the strengthening of the Lokpal and the Lokayukta in two day National Colloquium on "Ethics in Governance: Moving from Rhetoric to Results" September ½, 2006 at the National Judicial Academy, Bhopal. Mahatma Gandhi, father of the Nation, had understood the gathering crisis of corruption and prophesied that the public would lead in the forefront in exposing corrupt practices and taking to task those who were involved in them. He wrote in Young India in 1928: "Corruption will be out one day, however, much one may try to conceal it; and the public can, as its right and duty, in every case of justifiable suspicion, call its servants to strict account, dismiss them, sue them, in a law court or appoint 8 an arbitrator or inspector to scrutinize their conduct, as it likes. "He also said "On this earth, there is enough for everyone’s need but not for their greed. Allah Curses The Giver Of Bribes And The Receiver Of Bribes And The Person Who Paves The Way For Both You Shall Not Take Bribe Blinds the Eyes Of The Wise And Subverts The Cause Of The Righteous" A Constitution Bench of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Manoj Narula v. Union of India (2014) 9 SCC 1, held that corruption erodes the fundamental tenets of the rule of law and quoted with approval its judgment in Niranjan Hemchandra Sashittal & Anr. v. State of Maharashtra(2013) 4 SCC 642, it was held as under:- “20. It can be stated without any fear of contradiction that corruption is not to be judged by degree, for corruption mothers disorder, destroys societal will to progress, accelerates undeserved ambitions, kills the conscience, jettisons the glory of the institutions, paralyses the economic health of a country, corrodes the sense of civility and mars the marrows of governance.” 9 In Subramanian Swamy v. Manmohan Singh and Another(2012) 3 SCC 64, it was held as under:- “45. Today, corruption in our country not only poses a grave danger to the concept of constitutional governance, it also threatens the very foundation of Indian democracy and the Rule of Law.