DOCSLIB.ORG

Latin America: Muddy Road Ahead

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Latin America: Muddy Road Ahead No. 21 • LATIN AMERICA ISSUE• $2OO H EMPLOY LIS M O EN B T world A socialist review Journal of the World Socialist Movement in the United States Latin America: Muddy Road Ahead INSIDE a pre-socialist left? ¡viva la revolución! looking for socialism (in all the wrong places) brazil repeats history is cuba socialist? changing geopolitics review of build it now Latin America’s pre-socialist Left he hot issues in Latin America today are the self-deter- balization, they do not understand that concept either, because mination of nations and anti-imperialism. Both concepts globalization is only the wide spread of the capitalist mode of Tare false, because they drag the working class into the production, which is creating the proper conditions for a new trap of nationalism. Class struggle is not mentioned by any of society. They think that the spread of poverty, hunger and the political leaders, and the Left is not mentioning it either, unemployment is caused by globalization only, but they do not despite the fact that there is not any kind of homogeneity of say that it is a by-product of the capitalist system itself, and interests within any nation; every nation has antagonistic inter- that all those consequences are very normal for capitalism. As ests between the rulers and the working class. for [neo]liberalism, that concept is totally incorrect, because On a practical level, there is a lot confusion going around liberalism does not exist anymore; today the state is participat- in Latin America regarding leaders like Chávez, Castro and ing more in the economy than in prior years. Morales. The so-called socialism of the 21st century is a new Meet the new boss… state-capitalist variation invented by the Venezuelan leaders and probably suggested by the Cuban leadership: just another way The struggles (leftists say) are now being concentrated between for the national bourgeoisies of some Latin American countries imperialist countries and anti-imperialist countries, but the to get mass support for their interests. They are anti-Yanqui class struggle they place on a secondary level. Given, again, for now, but in reality, like Saddam Hussein, Hitler, or Stalin, that there is not an equality of interests between the rulers and they are not against capitalism — only against the the workers of any nation, this is a false argument. privatization of the means of production. I t The workers continue being exploited by the same ruling class that is trying to promote One thing the Latin American Left is not has been said itself as their liberator. That is one of the able to see (probably because they do not big dangers of Lenin’s concept of anti- have the proper principles to under- that, in places like imperialism: if the enemy is the United stand it) is that some of those so-called Latin America, the ideas States, not only does this mean they do socialist leaders, such as the President not differentiate between U.S. workers of Chile and the President of Brazil, of Marx never actually were and the U.S. ruling class, but they also are ambiguous. One moment they spread; what most leftists make alliances with the rulers of other are against domination by the U.S.’s countries such as China and Russia, rulers and the next they send troops know now is Leninism, or with the likes of Hamas and the to Haiti in order to collaborate with Stalinism and Trotskyism, Lebanese religious leaders. the invasions of that country; and at A third issue, finally, is another idea we the same time as the Brazilian capitalist which are all in essence have inherited from the Bolsheviks and the class is placing pressure on the President of the same ideas. Leninists — the concept of leadership. It has Bolivia against the nationalization of natural been said that, in places like Latin America, the resources, he is compromising with U.S. interests ideas of Marx never actually were spread; what most in Bolivia. The President of Paraguay, formerly a member leftists know now is Leninism, Stalinism and Trotskyism, which of the Tupac Amaru guerrilleros, promised a lot of changes and are in essence all the same ideas. Marxist-Leninists, former and benefits for the working class, and now he is collaborating with current, have in general done great damage to the ideas of social- the USA, doing the opposite of everything he said and moving ism and the Marxian vision of a new society without class, money more toward the right than the left. or state. They have been a great help to the ruling class. Fidel Castro, for his part, has been lauded as an immortal If Latin America’s leftists placed all their emphasis on the class leader, together with Che Guevara, since his last visit to Argentina struggle and were able to recognize that capitalism is the root of to promote the Mercosur [a trade agreement between Argentina, all the problems in the world, they would be forced to see that Brazil and Paraguay]. Even the Catholic Church is praying for Cuba, Venezuela, Bolivia and Chile are all capitalist countries him, now that he went through an emergency surgery! He is and that there are not common interests between the rulers of becoming the Messiah of Latin America, and if for any reason those countries and the working class. They would be forced he dies, probably Hugo Chávez will continue his ideological to negate themselves and their past, and to reject whatever work through the region. they are supporting now. Like Leon Trotsky in his struggles On a more theoretical level, while some leftist groups may with Stalin, Latin America’s Left stands behind the ruling class: look like they are against capitalism, they too are not against Trotsky never wanted to accept that the Soviet Union was a state capitalism or the capitalist system as a whole, which can state-capitalist economy, either. only be replaced by a new society. When they talk about glo- — Marcos Colomé world socialist review/2 INTERNET <wspus.org> ¡Viva la revolución! pen your eyes and you won’t believe humans and other creatures along the shore the beauty of the world. Wit- there only a decade ago (according to Oness the world’s smallest worldwildlife.org). deer, the endangered pudu, As for humans themselves, hopping gracefully across they too have been torn the Valdivia. Listen to the from their natural realm, rhythmic and loud tap- from a life of abundant pings of the magellanic gathering and hunting woodpecker. Watch to a life of stupendous the blue whales, the enslavement and world’s largest mam- immiseration. mals, emerge just a Painful as it is to stone’s throw from do, tear your eyes the beach. Else- away from this old where, observe the home, and set them giant river otters at upon the way of life play in the Amazon, of humans here in or the stealthy leap of a jaguar chasing Latin America today. its prey. The Amazon The Commission of itself courses seemingly Economics for Latin forever through the planet’s America informed the largest and most luxurious world in 1999 and again in 2002 that of the 420 million rainforest. Birds of the richest “C ar 2> people living in this continent, colors weave a tapestry above, their to 1 n d= er _i 40 percent are poor, and 16 percent sounds descending below like a per- os ge .” pa Sou a/? extremely poor. In rural areas, 55 percent petual orchestra of melody and cacophony. rce day.c : <http://www.one 3 The waters of the Gulf of California maintain an are poor and 33 percent extremely poor. impossible turquoise. The scurrying of the marine iguana on the Such figures made lies of the Inter-American Convention on Galápagos Islands, and so many other sights, sounds and smells, Indian Life’s claims in the 1940s that economic development remind us of our place in the extraordinarily rich weaving of life, would reduce poverty, falsities upon which developmental theory which for timeless eons provided for our material needs rather and policy of the last sixty years were based. abundantly, as long as humans were able to cooperate together in sharing the fruits of this abundance with each other, and Causes of child labor and poverty 1 with the other creatures that adorned the planet. Many humans Most traditional capitalist analyses of these conditions decried came for sure to this breathtakingly stunning land southward the absence of any earning power of a majority of rural dwellers from the Bering Land Bridge and possibly directly from Africa and so recommended rural development programs.4 And yet (if C.S. Gladwin’s facts are correct in .)2 The Gladwin Thesis the rural poor are the direct result of the commodification of Welcome home, we city dwellers might think as we first cast production, an historical process that has turned peasants and our eyes upon its beauty. One would think that it would go tribal people into workers around the globe since the 1700s, on providing for us for another few million years, and that it effectively robbing them of land and of the means to secure would always feel like home. With our eyes and ears we have a livelihood without employment, itself scarce in these parts been able to witness what appears a heavenly place. And yet, compared with population size. “No profit, no production” is sadly, sights are deceiving. For the Amazon’s rainforest is being the golden rule of the era of employment and capital accumula- destroyed at the rate of 9,000 square miles a year, and the Gulf tion, and clearly this rule disproportionately affects the Southern of California, home of seriously depleted schools of sardines and Hemisphere’s poor.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Revolution, Not Reform
    Revolution, Not Reform Revolution, Not Reform by Jordan Levi Published by: The World Socialist Party of the United States P.O. Box 44024, Boston, MA 02144 September, 2019 ISBN 9781097623600 Dedicated to Earth and all of its offspring past, present, and future. May we make it through these trying times with sound reason. “In modern agriculture, as in the urban industries, the increased productiveness and quantity of the labour set in motion are bought at the cost of laying waste and consuming by disease labour-power itself. Moreover, all progress in capitalistic agriculture is a prog- ress in the art, not only of robbing the labourer, but of robbing the soil; all progress in increasing the fertility of the soil for a given time, is a progress towards ruining the lasting sources of that fer- tility. The more a country starts its development on the foundation of modern industry, like the United States, for example, the more rapid is this process of destruction. Capitalist production, there- fore, develops technology, and the combining together of various processes into a social whole, only by sapping the original sources of all wealth-the soil and the labourer” -Karl Marx, Capital, Volume 1, Chapter 15, Section 10 Table of Contents Acknowledgments ...................................................................... 7 Foreword ...................................................................................... 9 Preface ......................................................................................... 11 Introduction: Dystopia ............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • At the Parting of the Ways, by Hermon Titus
    Titus: At the Parting of the Ways [April 8, 1905] 1 At the Parting of the Ways by Hermon F. Titus Published in The Socialist [Toledo, Ohio], whole no. 237 (April 8, 1905), pg. 2. Unsigned article attributed to editor Hermon Titus. The almost simultaneous occurrence of two re- taken, now and for all time. cent incidents has brought the Socialist Party sharply, but not unexpectedly, to the parting of the ways. We Enough of Impossibilism. say “not unexpectedly” because those who have kept close watch upon party affairs have foreseen that, The Socialist movement of America has had sooner or later, the party would be confronted with enough of impossibilism, whether it come clothed in the alternative of continuing along the straight road the garb of a DeLeon, a [Thomas J.] Hagerty, or what which a working class Socialist Party must travel in else. We have been surfeited by its propaganda of exple- order to achieve its mission, or of taking one of the tives, of misrepresentations, of meaningless mouthings two roads leading either to the impassable heights of of revolutionary phrases which have almost fallen into impossibilism or the treacherous mire of opportun- disrepute through misuse and distortion. ism. It has taken years of unceasing labor to overcome The two incidents alluded to are the Berger com- some of the ruinous effects of the DeLeon policy, the promise in Milwaukee and the Hagerty affair at San policy which closed the ears of the organized working Francisco, both outrages against the party principles class to Socialist agitation and blinded them to the and integrity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Socialist Party of Canada
    The Impossibilists: A brief profile of the Socialist Party of Canada by Peter E. Newell In memory of Geoff Verco (1925 – 2006), a friend for 66 years ii By the same author Fighting the Revolution: Makho-Durruti-Zapata (London, England, 1972) Zapata of Mexico (Sanday, Scotland, 1979) (reprinted: Montreal, Canada, 1997) (reprinted: London, England, 2005) Stamps of Alderney (Chippenham, England, 1982) (reprinted and enlarged: Brighton, England, 1988) Photographs supplied by the late George Jenkins, Karla Rab Ellenbogen, Steve Shannon, Steve Szalai, John Ames, Adam Buick, the author and the Cumberland Museum on Vancouver Island. Front cover designed by the author. Peter E Newell left school at 17 years of age without any qualifications. He has been a draughtsman, a postman, a trade union journalist and official, a sewage worker and a local government officer. He has been a member of an appropriate trade union since 1944, and is a member of the retired members’ section of UNISON. He retired from Colchester Borough Council in 1995. He spent some time Mexico, in 1979, and his Zapata of Mexico has been published in Scotland, Canada and England. i “…the possessing class rules directly by means of universal suffrage. As long as the oppressed class – in our case, therefore, the proletariat – is not ripe for its self-liberation, so long will it, in its majority, recognise the existing order of society as the only possible one and remain politically the tail of the capitalist class, its extreme left wing. But in the measure in which it matures towards its self-emancipation, in the same measure it constitutes itself as its own party and votes for its own representatives, not those of the capitalists.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Socialist Standard March 2020
    Socialist Standard March 2020 1 Editorial Towards a Disunited Kingdom? The turmoil of the Brexit process has of the 2008 financial crisis, many workers It must be noted that the electoral exacerbated the fissures within the UK, turned away from the mainstream successes of the SNP and Sinn Féin do not which threaten to tear it apart. The capitalist parties. In Scotland, this helped always reflect support for their respective Scottish National Party leader, Nicola the SNP to secure a majority in the 2011 aims of an independent Scotland and a Sturgeon, seized on the fact that the elections for the Scottish Parliament and a united Ireland, but more often a deep majority of Scottish voters opted to landslide in the 2015 General Election. dissatisfaction with the political status remain in the EU, and is demanding a The Irish border has been in contention quo. Nevertheless, these parties will use second independence referendum. The since 1921. However, with the repression their increased leverage to push for their border between the North of Ireland and of the Civil Rights movement in the aims. the Irish Republic which appeared to be North of Ireland in the late 1960s, Irish Do the working class have any invisible since the Good Friday agreement republicanism experienced an upsurge interest in whether or not the United became a stumbling block in the Brexit of support. In the 1980s Sinn Féin was Kingdom remains intact? Or should negotiations. Sinn Fein wasted no time in able to capitalise on the outrage that they, as the Left urges them to, support pressing for a border poll which they hope the British government’s response to the an independent Scotland and a united will lead to the reunification of Ireland.
    [Show full text]
  • The Knoxmaxton Affair
    Socialist Studies The Knox­Maxton Affair Socialist Studies No.8 Book Review Spanner & The SPGB The Socialist Party Refuses to Debate The Knox­Maxton Affair (How james Maxton M.P., lifelong member of the Independent Labour Party and opponent of the Socialist Party of Great Britain was, in 1987, dressed up afresh by the Clapham­based Socialist Party to appear as “the personification of Socialism”). The Independent Labour Party (I.L.P.) The I.L.P, formed in 1983, had established a dominating influence over the Labour Party at the time of the Labour Governments of 1924 and 1929­31. Two­thirds of the Labour MP’s were members of the I.L.P., including Prime Minister Ramsay MacDonald and many other Ministers. The I.L.P. was a reformist organisation aiming to establish state capitalism (Nationalisation). It claimed to be socialist but what it meant by socialism was set out in its pamphlet “SOCIALISM AT WORK IN QUEENSLAND”. This described the actions of the Labour Government in Queensland in taking over sugar mills, cattle farms, butcher shops, etc. The pamphlet contained this statement: “Workers of Great Britain and Ireland, the policy of the I.L.P. is identically the same as the policy of Ryan’s Socialist Government of Queensland. And what has been done in Queensland can be done in Great Britain and Ireland”. The I.L.P. helped to form the Labour party and was affiliated to it until 1932. It disaffiliated in that year over the issue of the right of I.L.P. members of Parliament to be allowed, on occasion, to vote against Labour Party policies.
    [Show full text]
  • Socialist Fulcrum
    Iff* i « of the Socialist Party erf Canada ^ly journal o Vol. 13. No 1 Socialist Fulcrum ft! 40< I Of Voluntary Cooperation And Free Acceee A Wepeteee Common Ownership end Oamoemtfe Contra/ k IF» 41 II I > Ji i . ELECTION ’80 I °LD MISTAKES REVIVED gold Election & leaders j j Nl)f CAPITALISM v°vr ballot 2_________________ SOCIALIST FULCRUM______________________ Voi. 13, No. | Commonwealth Federation (the NDPj former name) was inaugurated in 195? ttu: xiinhjf IntheNews the CCFz'NDP stands for capitalism, n* state or the private variety being of Jim, Editorial Note; la common with her si>- concern. The NDP is more easily etp.-^-i rerx, Sylvia was a bit thin on theory. Class APPEAR TO BE DIFFERENT however, when spokesmen like Hovdebo at distinctions do not, as Sylvia contends, arise The death of former Tory Prime Minister inadvertantly candid. from differences of education but from John Diefenhaker brought about a bvelec- One of Hobdebo’s qualtftcatioos was sad ownership of means of production. There tion in the Prince Albert federal to be ",.. his vote-getting ability,’’ whahi are examples of poorly educated, even constituency. was the NDP’s choice in the May general stuped. children of capitalists who live with A “crowd" (to use the terminology of the election, where he took votes away powei and comfort N evert he leas the article Saskatchewan "Commonwealth") of 1,000 from Diefenbaker. To effect this, it hcJpt to makes interesting reading if only to compare attended an NDP convention to pick a can­ appear to be an alternative to the other par­ how fat her modern contemporaries have didate for the Nov.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bolshevik Revolution and Our Socialist Opposition 1917 2017
    Socialist Studies The Bolshevik Revolution and our Socialist Studies No 105, Autumn 2017 Socialist Opposition 1917 ­2017 The Russian Revolution: A Soviet Bulletin of June 1917 The Bolshevik Revolution and The Origins Of Bolshevism From Our Archives ­ The Russian our Socialist Opposition 1917 Revolution ­2017 Bolshevism or Socialism? The SPGB On Leninism and the Legacy of 1917 From Our Archives ­ The Turmoil in When Lenin’s small band placed themselves at the head of Petrograd protests, they came to power promising “Peace, Land Russia – WHERE WE STAND, AUGUST 1991 and Bread! “They also promised “All Power to the Soviets!” In short, they deluded the hungry workers with promises they would not keep. While Lenin and his clique proclaimed this was a Socialist revolution, the Socialist Party of Great Britain argued it could not be. At first the Party’s writers and speakers were hampered by lack of reliable information, as the media information in war­time was unreliable, biased by war­time censorship as well as the usual capitalist bias. Initially, the SPGB had welcomed these revolutionaries – they would at least take Russia’s workers out of the WWI bloodbath! But, even with limited information, it was clear that the essential preconditions for Socialism – an advanced, capitalist, class system and a class­conscious, wage­slave working class, democratically organised for the overthrow of the wages system and the establishment of Socialism: these simply could not and did not exist in war­torn Russia. The first in­depth SPGB assessment was an article The Revolution in Russia – Where it Fails (SOCIALIST SYANDARD, August 1918).
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Socialist Standard February 2021
    Socialist Standard February 2021 1 Introducing the Socialist Party The Socialist Party advocates a society developing Russian capitalism under a where production is freed from the one-party dictatorship. Both failures have artificial constraints of profit and given socialism a quite different -- and organised for the benefit of all on the unattractive -- meaning: state ownership basis of material abundance. It does not and control. As the Socialist Standard have policies to ameliorate aspects of pointed out before both courses were the existing social system. It is opposed followed, the results would more properly to all war. be called state capitalism. The Socialist Standard is the combative The Socialist Party and the World monthly journal of the Socialist Party, Socialist Movement affirm that capitalism published without interruption since is incapable of meaningful change in 1904. In the 1930s the Socialist Standard the interests of the majority; that the explained why capitalism would not basis of exploitation is the wages/money collapse of its own accord, in response to system. The Socialist Standard is proud widespread claims to the contrary, and to have kept alive the original idea of continues to hold this view in face of the what socialism is -- a classless, stateless, notion’s recent popularity. Beveridge’s of the natural world can have limited wageless, moneyless society or, defined welfare measures of the 1940s were effect and run counter to the nature of positively, a democracy in which free and viewed as a reorganisation of poverty and capitalism itself. equal men and women co-operate to a necessary ‘expense’ of production, and Gradualist reformers like the Labour produce the things they need to live and Keynesian policies designed to overcome Party believed that capitalism could be enjoy life, to which they have free access slumps an illusion.
    [Show full text]
  • The War in Libya
    Socialist Studies The War in Libya Socialist Studies No 80, Summer 2011 The Arab Awakening 20 Years of Reconstituted SPGB Do Workers Cause Inflation? The War in Libya Marx and the Machinery of Government Socialism The Labour Government Connection. SPGB and the question of reforms Blair's War For Oil Until recently, Colonel Gaddafi was a friend of Western capitalism, feted by former Labour Prime Ministers Tony Blair and Reform or Revolution Gordon Brown while his son, Saif, whose LSE doctorate was Govan Workers Forum: 1931 monitored by Professor David Held, now writing Ed Milliband’s No 'Right to Work' Under Capitalism political manifesto, and signed off by the Labour peer, Lord Desai, Socialism and Work was a close confidant of Lord Mandelson. In 2005, the Labour government licenced the sale of £29.5m worth of “military Problem of Production & Distribution transport aircraft” to Libya; and in 2009 and 2010 again Commodity Struggle or Class Struggle authorised the sale of “bombing computers” and “military aircraft equipment” (PRIVATE EYE 18th March 2011). In return lucrative oil deals were forged with the Libyan Oil Corporation and BP with a major exploration and production agreement in March 2007. Following the up­risings across Libya in February 2011, Gaddafi’s regime, with a track record of brutality, torture and repression, became once more a pariah State with the ironic spectacle of British Typhoon jet fighters (cost in use of £80,000 per hour) destroying British military equipment bought by the Gaddafi regime, though not before his secret police had used on protestors an assortment of “anti­riot shields, body armour, anti­riot guns, crowd control ammunition, smoke ammunition, tear gas/irritant ammunition” purchased from British arm manufacturers via Serbia (loc cit).
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Socialist Standard March 2021
    Socialist Standard March 2021 1 Introducing the Socialist Party The Socialist Party advocates a society developing Russian capitalism under a where production is freed from the one-party dictatorship. Both failures have artificial constraints of profit and given socialism a quite different -- and organised for the benefit of all on the unattractive -- meaning: state ownership basis of material abundance. It does not and control. As the Socialist Standard have policies to ameliorate aspects of pointed out before both courses were the existing social system. It is opposed followed, the results would more properly to all war. be called state capitalism. The Socialist Standard is the combative The Socialist Party and the World monthly journal of the Socialist Party, Socialist Movement affirm that capitalism published without interruption since is incapable of meaningful change in 1904. In the 1930s the Socialist Standard the interests of the majority; that the explained why capitalism would not basis of exploitation is the wages/money collapse of its own accord, in response to system. The Socialist Standard is proud widespread claims to the contrary, and to have kept alive the original idea of continues to hold this view in face of the what socialism is -- a classless, stateless, notion’s recent popularity. Beveridge’s of the natural world can have limited wageless, moneyless society or, defined welfare measures of the 1940s were effect and run counter to the nature of positively, a democracy in which free and viewed as a reorganisation of poverty and capitalism itself. equal men and women co-operate to a necessary ‘expense’ of production, and Gradualist reformers like the Labour produce the things they need to live and Keynesian policies designed to overcome Party believed that capitalism could be enjoy life, to which they have free access slumps an illusion.
    [Show full text]
  • Object of the Socialist Party of Great Britain
    Socialist Studies SPGB: Principles and Policy Socialist Studies No.3 Socialist Party's Anti­Marxist Friends Declaration of Principles: Clause 4 OBJECT OF THE SOCIALIST PARTY OF GREAT BRITAIN The establishment of a system of society based upon the common ownership and democratic control of the means and instruments for producing and distributing wealth by and in the interest of the whole community. A System of society alludes to the sum total of human relationships and is meant to distinguish us from those who seek to organise co­operative colonies, islands within a sea of capitalism. Socialism is not a colony, not a kibbutz but a system of society in the sense that capitalism, feudalism, and chattel slavery must all be characterised as systems of society. The term “common ownership” should not be confused with such phenomena as state ownership or “public ownership” terms used under capitalism to designate a more direct ownership of certain industries by the capitalist class as a whole. Common ownership implies the absence of ownership and we specify that this common ownership is to apply to the means and instruments for producing and distributing wealth. We do not speak here of someone’s personal belongings as some not too discerning opponents of our case delight in inferring. “Democratic control” should speak for itself but the point must be made nevertheless, that in a society wherein the means and instruments of wealth production and distribution are commonly owned it is difficult to conceive of control other than democratic. In order to rule out all possibility of misunderstanding it is necessary to indicate some of the consequences of establishing the socialist system of society summarised above.
    [Show full text]
  • July Standard
    Socialist Standard July 2016 1 socialist standard Contents July 2016 Features Regulars 10 100 years of the World Socialist 10 4 Pathfi nders Party of the US 5 Le" ers The History of the WSP(US) 6 Halo Halo! 6 Cooking the Books 1 12 The Socialist Party of America Dashed on the rocks of compromise 7 Greasy Pole 9 Material World 15 The ‘democra$ c socialism’ of 18 Cooking the Books 2 Bernie Sanders 19 Proper Gander Just how socialist is he? 20 Reviews 17 Looking back on Edward Bellamy 22 50 Years Ago We examine Bellamy’s Looking Backward 23 Mee$ ngs 15 24 Rear View 24 Free Lunch 12 22 Introducing the Socialist Party The Socialist Party is like no other poli cal capitalism. Polish, Spanish, Swedish and Turkish as party in Britain. It is made up of people We use every possible opportunity well as English. who have joined together to make new socialists. We The more of you who join the Socialist because we want to get publish pamphlets and Party the more we will be able to get our rid of the profi t system books, as well as CDs, ideas across, the more experiences we and establish real DVDs and various will be able to draw on and greater will be socialism. Our aim is other informa$ ve the new ideas for building the movement to persuade others to material. We also give which you will be able to bring us. become socialist and talks and take part The Socialist Party is an organisa$ on of act for themselves, in debates; a" end equals.
    [Show full text]