DOCSLIB.ORG

Catalog of Compromise, Change, and Contradiction in the SSPX

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Catalog of Compromise, Change, and Contradiction in the SSPX Catalog of Compromise, Change, and Contradiction in the SSPX https://www.cathinfo.com/sspx-resistance-news/catalog-of-compromise-change-and- contradiction-in-the-sspx/ #1: Change (New Mass Participation Sinful or Not?) All the SSPX faithful should be well familiar with the little blue book, Christian Warfare, published by the SSPX and promoted and used on their Ignatian retreats. In the section on the Examination of Conscience, under the third commandment (page 289 in the 2006 edition) we find the following: Have you attended and actively participated in the "New Mass"? Have you received Holy Communion in the hand? Yet, in the new edition, this sentence was replaced with: Have you received Holy Communion in the hand knowing that it leads to Sacrilege and loss of faith in the Real Presence? Have you attended and actively participated in non-Catholic religious services? https://tradcatresist.blogspot.com/2018/06/lastweek-fr-morgan-celebrated-his.html Clearly the SSPX no longer wishes to suggest attending the Novus Ordo is sinful. #2: Contradiction (SSPX’ers Married by Conciliarists?) In the US District, the old (attached) SSPX Marriage Form M-2(a) required a signature of the marriage parties before a Society priest would consent to perform the wedding. That form includes the following passage: "Moreover, I insist on my right to receive all the sacraments in an entirely traditional way, and consequently refuse to have my wedding celebrated by a priest who celebrates the new Mass, or in a church in which the new Mass is celebrated.” Today, however, the SSPX has accepted to be bound by the April 4, 2017 "Pastoral Guidelines" of Cardinal Mueller (authorized by Pope Francis) which state, among other things: "Insofar as possible, the Local Ordinary [that is, normally the local Diocesan Bishop] is to grant the delegation to assist at the marriage to a priest of the Diocese (or in any event, to a fully regular priest), such that the priest may receive the consent of the parties during the marriage rite..." https://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2017/04/step-by-step-vatican-issues-marriage.html This is a clear and direct contradiction to SSPX Marriage Form M-2(a) of the US District (which presumably has either subsequently been edited to bring itself into compliance with this new norm, or discarded altogether). (SSPX Faithful married by a conciliar priest in a conciliar church in Canada) http://www.ecclesiamilitans.com/2018/03/21/a-picture-of-the-marriage-ceremony/ #3: Contradiction (Trap vs No Trap): One year after the episcopal consecrations, Archbishop Lefebvre warned the faithful that any overtures from modernist Rome were nothing but a trap: "That is why what can look like a concession is in reality merely a maneuver to separate us from the largest number of faithful possible. This is the perspective in which they seem to be always giving a little more and even going very far. We must absolutely convince our faithful that it is no more than a maneuver, that it is dangerous to put oneself into the hands of Conciliar bishops and Modernist Rome. It is the greatest danger threatening our people. If we have struggled for twenty years to avoid the Conciliar errors, it was not in order, now, to put ourselves in the hands of those professing these errors." http://sspx.org/en/one-year-after-consecrations Bishop Fellay (under the most anti-traditional Pope in history) thinks otherwise: In his 8/24/16 Australian conference, he said: "But in itself, you cannot imagine anything better than what is offered there. And such a thing that you cannot think ‘That’s a trap.’ It’s not a trap. And if somebody is offering something like that, we are offered something like that, it can be only because he wants good to us. He wants the good of Tradition, he wants Tradition to spread within the Church.” NB: As the YouTube video of this conference was removed for obvious reasons, we will divert the reader to Issue #37 of The Recusant, where he may find a transcription of the quoted passage, posted here: http://www.stmaryskssspxmc.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/The-Recusant-371.pdf #4: Contradiction (A strict right to know?): Archbishop Lefebvre: "They have indeed a strict right to know that the priests who serve them are not in communion with a counterfeit church, promoting evolution, pentecostalism and syncretism." https://www.sspxasia.com/Documents/Archbishop- Lefebvre/Archbishop_Lefebvre_and_the_Vatican/Part_I/1988-07-06.htm VS. Neo-SSPX: "Non-SSPX members [i.e., the faithful] do not have a strict right to be kept informed about the internal affairs of the SSPX, which is a religious congregation." https://sspx.org/en/news-events/news/%E2%80%9Cneed%E2%80%9D-know-all-vs-peace-soul-3073 #5: Contradiction (Bishop de Galarreta vs Bishop de Galarreta): On the matter of a practical accord with unconverted Rome, Bishop de Galarreta contradicted himself in only one years' time: Initially ruling out a merely practical accord, the bishop in 2011 said: "Following the Roman proposal, the real question, crucial, is: should we, can we, we take the path of a "possible" practical agreement first? Is it prudent and appropriate to maintain contacts with Rome leading to such an agreement? As far as I am concerned, the answer is clear: we must refuse this path because we cannot do something evil so that a good (a good which is, moreover, uncertain) can come from it, and also because this would necessarily bring about evils (very certain) for the common good that we possess, namely that of the Society and of the family of Tradition. [...] How then does this not go against the defence and public confession of faith, against the public need to protect the faithful and the Church? In this regard, if we make a purely practical agreement we are, in the present circumstances, already engaging in duplicity and ambiguity. The very fact is a public testimony and a message: we cannot be in "full communion" with the authorities who remain modernists." https://www.cathinfo.com/sspx-resistance-news/reflections-on-a-roman-proposal-(full-text)/ Very good! But only one year later, the exact opposite: "The Society’s position is much more precise and clear now than it was six months ago; it is much better, for we do not exclude the possibility of Providence choosing to bring about a return to the Faith through conversion [on the Part of Rome, presumably – Ed.] We have simply said: if there is not firstly a return on the part of Rome or of the next Pope to Tradition [...] but if this Pope wishes simply to allow Tradition, what are the conditions that would allow us to accept a canonical normalization, in view of the good that we could do in the Church and this good is considerable? We must not deny this possibility.” http://archives.sspx.org/sspx_and_rome/bishop_de_galarreta_conference_10-13-2012.htm The SSPX had "recovered its profound unity" at the chapter, putting the company ahead of the Faith. #6: Contradiction (Bishop Fellay Suicidal?): From a February/2009 interview with The Remnant regarding autonomy from the diocesan bishops: "Brian Mershon: Do you foresee any oversight by territorial diocesan bishops once the Society is regularized? Bp. Fellay: That would be our death.” https://www.remnantnewspaper.com/Archives/2009-mershon-interview-fellay.htm Three years later, Bishop Fellay had apparently lost his fear of death: Bishop Fellay: "It is still true—since it is Church law—that in order to open a new chapel or to found a work, it would be necessary to have the permission of the local ordinary. We have quite obviously reported to Rome how difficult our present situation was in the dioceses, and Rome is still working on it. Here or there, this difficulty will be real, but since when is life without difficulties?" http://archives.sspx.org/superior_generals_news/bishop_fellay_dici_interview_about_rome_6-8-2012.htm #7: Contradiction (Bishop Fellay vs Archbishop Lefebvre on Vatican II): Archbishop Lefebvre blames the Council: "Without rejecting this Council wholesale, I think that it is the greatest disaster of this century and of all the past centuries, since the founding of the Church." https://www.angelus.online/en_US/8362/120253/a_matter_of_principle.html Bishop Fellay excuses or downplays the Council: "I think, we see that many things which we would have condemned as being from the council are in fact not from the council, but the common understanding of it." https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=74&v=DdnJigNzTuY #8: Contradiction: (A Deal with Unconverted and Modernist Rome?): Archbishop Lefebvre: "It is, therefore, a strict duty for every priest wanting to remain Catholic to separate himself from this Conciliar Church for as long as it does not rediscover the Tradition of the Church and of the Catholic Faith.” (Spiritual Journey, p. 13) vs Bishop Fellay (speaking of his discussions with modernist Rome in his 2/2/12 Winona sermon): "We told them very clearly, if you accept us as is, without change, without obliging us to accept these things, then we are ready." http://archives.sspx.org/superior_generals_news/bishop_fellay_sermon_february_2_2012.htm This very thread will suffice to demonstrate that the SSPX has not been accepted as they are, but has instead undergone a radical transformation in pursuit of a canonical regularization. #9: Change (Is Vatican II Part of Tradition?): Archbishop Lefebvre commenting on a statement of Cardinal Suenens: "It was Cardinal Suenens who exclaimed, “Vatican II is the French Revolution in the Church” and among other unguarded declarations he added “One cannot understand the French or the Russian revolutions unless one knows something of the old regimes which they brought to an end… It is the same in church affairs: a reaction can only be judged in relation to the state of things that preceded it”.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ecclesiastical Circumscriptions and Their Relationship with the Diocesan Bishop
    CANON 294 ECCLESIASTICAL CIRCUMSCRIPTIONS AND THEIR RELATIONSHIP WITH THE DIOCESAN BISHOP What is the relationship of the faithful in personal ecclesiastical circumscriptions to the local diocesan bishop? OPINION The Apostolic See, in the Annual General Statistical Questionnaire, asks diocesan bishops the number of priests in the ecclesiastical circumscription of the diocese, their country of origin and whether they are diocesan or religious. The fact that the diocesan bishop is answering these questions indicates the close relationship between himself and any personal Ecclesiastical Circumscription. Canons 215 and 216 of the 1917 Code required that ecclesiastical circumscriptions be territorial within a diocese and an apostolic indult was needed, for example, to establish personal parishes for an ethnic group of the faithful. After World War II, Pope Pius XII provided for the pastoral care of refugees and migrants in his apostolic constitution Exsul Familia in 1952. Chaplains for migrants were granted special faculties to facilitate pastoral care without receiving the power of jurisdiction or governance. The Second Vatican Council admitted personal criteria in ecclesiastical organisation. The decree Christus Dominus 11 held that the essential element of a particular Church is personal, being a “portion of the people of God”. Personal factors are crucial to determine the communitarian aspect of the makeup of a community. After Vatican II, the Code of Canon Law needed revision. The Synod of Bishops in 1967 approved the principles to guide the revision of the code. The eighth principle stated: “The principle of territoriality in the exercise of ecclesiastical government is to be revised somewhat, for contemporary apostolic factors seem to recommend personal jurisdictional units.
    [Show full text]
  • Le Rocher N°
    c’est le christ LE Rocher Bulletin romand du District de Suisse No 129 février - mars 2021 éDitorial Sommaire La crise du coronavi- PARTIE OFFICIELLE rus dure depuis un an . Lettre du Supérieur de district . 3 LA PAROLE DE MGR LEFEBVRE Si les gouvernements Nous ne trouvons plus la charité de N .-S . Jésus- s’emploient à atténuer Christ dans nos sociétés . 7 les conséquences économiques de la VIE DE DE L’ÉGLISE crise, nous subissons de notre côté Une année dédiée à saint Joseph . 11 les mesures de lutte contre la propa- Des évêques républicains face à la loi qui a gation du virus . dépénalisé l’avortement . 13 Sur le plan spirituel et de manière SOCIÉTÉ Les religions face aux épidémies . 17 plus générale, il est intéressant de Referendum contre le “mariage pour tous” . 22 noter comment les religions ont VIE DE LA TRADITION réagi aux épidémies, de la peste à la Action de carême 2021 . .. 25 Covid-19 . (cf . p . 17) . L’école “Saint-François-de-Sales” . 27 Du côté de nos communautés, la Journal de route du district . 31 crise a manifesté quelques fragilités . Il PETITE REVUE DE PRESSE Nouvelles de Suisse et d’ailleurs . 35 faut les regarder en face, rester ancrés UNE PAGE D’HISTOIRE DE L’ÉGLISE dans l’essentiel et ne pas nous diviser Saint Pierre Canisius . 39 pour des question annexes (cf . p . 3) . TÉLÉGRILLES Nous vivons dans une société qui Découvrez un auteur et son livre . 48 a accepté l’avortement (cf . p . 13), qui VIE SPIRITUELLE s'acharne à vouloir changer le sens du Les retraites en Suisse romande .
    [Show full text]
  • Prochoix La Revue Du Droit De Choisir
    ProChoix la revue du droit de choisir Prochoix40.ok.indd 1 7/06/07 8:42:51 9 ProChoix n° 40- juin 2007 Sommaire A propos de la "diabolisation" de Sarkozy 5 Le "tout sauf Sarkozy" a justifié trop de dérapages à gauche (LiLiane KandeL) 9 Qui diabolise qui ? (�C. Fourest) 13� �����������������������������������������������La vraie histoire du site ���������������������"tout sauf Sarkozy" (J.Y. Camus) 16� ����épo � �����se à J.Y. Camus et C. Fourest (L.KandeL) Enquêtes et décryptages 21 Darfour : gé�ocide, co�flit eth�o-religieux ou crise huma�itaire ? (rudY reiChstadt) 3�3� La liberté comme forme (Catherine KintzLer) 43� La gauche et le piège de l'égalité factice (arnauLd Champremier-trigano) 47 Djamel Bouras sous les couleurs du Modem (C. Fourest) 51 Attaques racistes co�tre �achida Dati (CaroLine BranCher) 55 Christi�e Bouti� : le retour e� grâce de la Mado��e des Yveli�es (C. Fourest, F. Venner) 59 Nicolas Sarkozy et le verouillage médiatique (JuLie gouazé) 73� Le faux pari du vote commu�autaire et religieux (F. Venner) 79 Malalai Joya, la passio�aria de l'Afgha�ista� (CaroL mann) 85 Abus policiers, crise de la citoye��eté (CoLLeCtiF) Prochoix40.ok.indd 2 7/06/07 8:42:51 9 Raymond Barre : nouvelle polémique 91 �aymo�d Barre : der�ier acte (anne gaJouri) 97 �aymo�d Barre ou l’a�tisémitisme de droite (pierre WeiLL) 99 L’i�tégralité de l’e�tretien On a vu on a lu on en parle ON A LU : �oger Garaudy : Iti�éraire d’u�e �égation — Nicolas Sarkozy, la fri�gale du pouvoir — E�quête sur un homme de pouvoir — Les passio�s i�tellectuelles III
    [Show full text]
  • Note to the Reader This File Includes the Following
    1 Note to the Reader This file includes the following documents: 1. The letter from the President of the Brazilian TFP sent to Atila Sinke Guimarães. This docu- ment presents Atila with an Ultimatum, demanding that he stop the dissemination of In the Murky Waters of Vatican II and the publication of the rest of his Collection or face expulsion from the TFP (pp. 1-6); 2. Two Declarations from TFP members supporting the arguments of the President's letter (pp. 7-10); 3. The Defense by Atila Guimarães, in response to the accusations of the aforementioned doc- uments. (pp. 11-253). The Letter of the President of the TFP to Atila Sinke Guimarães Brazilian Society for the Defense of Tradition, Family and Property National Council São Paulo, November 20, 1997 Mr. Atila Sinke Guimarães Eremo de Elias Itaquera – São Paulo Dear Mr. Atila, Salve Maria! I was shocked at the news you gave to Dr. Plinio Xavier on Saturday, November 8, saying that a book under your authorship would be published in the United States (under the title The Murky Waters of Vatican II) and that a text of Prof. Plinio would be used in its Preface. In the last two years, Dr. Plinio Xavier had several conversations with you about this study of yours. In these conversations he insisted especially on the fact that our late and dear Founder did not de- sire this work to be published before he himself reviewed it in its entirety and that, with Prof. Pli- nio’s absence, we were against its publication without an assurance that your writing was secure and the occasion timely.
    [Show full text]
  • Quo Primum Decree Pope St Pius V
    Quo Primum Decree Pope St Pius V Capparidaceous and nettly Udall dignifying her poloist exudates acervately or quarrelled savagely, is Maynord interlinear? How pentangular is Mort when glowering and bloodshot Lucien tying some refundments? Uncurbed Tailor stagnates, his wangle preoccupy dissolvings immemorially. He would be used exactly as elizabeth to pope decree something that agustoni resigned his refusal to Rome and pius v did not wish of the decree above all credentials he was not a law to what. The pope cannot get better in arguing in any other liturgical directives and decreed its natural power over time of sts views he! If he always valid and the absence of the father manelli and staff at st ia, quo primum decree pope st pius v carried in short. The pope leo xiii, sts one culture that wants you ask him thoroughly, leaves argentina before and decreed that he was first. Although st pius x is. Sspx schism mean in pope decree and decrees are praying the popes will give glory to change his back. His decree on st pius v decreed that pope and decrees of popes make him so the salvation of the ages vs. You decree confirming that pope paul ii popes, sts a new prefaces can also decreed that passeth away from sincerity and! The decree that language that these things that the throne, actually excommunicated from the same. This missal was recorded in exercising jurisdiction of! Second st pius v decreed that pope to recognize and decrees of. The sacred mysteries of pope to find it either the sacrament of a case upon this do this were.
    [Show full text]
  • Mother Teresa, the Angel of Calcutta
    INDIA Mother Teresa, the angel of Calcutta ©Simone Bergamaschi Calcutta, India, Nirmala Shishu Bhavan it’s the house built by Mother Teresa and the Missionaries of Charity to welcome orphan kids and the ones with physical or mental problems. In the area there are a lot of families counting on this centre to give their children a better present. On September 4th, 2016 Pope Francis will proclaim saint a tiny nun from Albania, born in 1910 and passed away 87 years later: Mother Teresa. Just saying her name recalls immediately her minute figure, wrapped up in a white and blue sari, always with a smile on her wrinkled face. Having her name associated with the city of Calcutta (from 2001 officially known as Kolkata) is more difficult for many: it’s the place where Mother Teresa lived and worked most of her life, serving the poorest among the poorest surrounded by extreme indigence and its related violence, decay and enormous suffering. It was that immense poverty to push Mother Teresa to move to Calcutta right after completing her novitiate and her nurse education in the North Bengal. She never left Calcutta since then. Here she started to look after and cure the sick persons she was finding on the roads, founding later the order of the Missionaries of Charity and a huge number of homeless centres, hospitals and clinics dedicated to people affected by leprosy. In many occasions Mother Teresa found herself involved in controversies, but her tireless missionary activity gained more and more credibility as time went by. She also started to be supported from personalities like Lady Diana Spencer, and in 1979 she received the Nobel Peace Prize.
    [Show full text]
  • Legalization of Greek Catholic Church in Czechoslovakia in 1968
    E-Theologos, Vol. 1, No. 2 DOI 10.2478/v10154-010-0017-3 Legalization of Greek Catholic Church in Czechoslovakia in 1968 Jaroslav Coranič University of Prešov in Prešov, Faculty of Greek-Catholic Theology A re-legalization of the Greek Catholic Church in Czechoslovakia was one of the most important results of the revival of socio - political process of the Prague Spring. This Church, unlike the Roman Catholic Church in the period 1950 - 1968 did not even exist legally. It was due to power interference of the communist state power in 1950. The plan of Commu- nist Party assumed the "transformation" of Greek Catholic Church into the Orthodox one. Procedure of liquidation of the Greek Catholic Church later came to be known as Action "P". Its climax came in April 28th 1950, when “sobor of Presov”, being prepared for a longer time, took place. The gath- ering in “sobor” manipulated by the communists declared in “sobor” the abolition of the Union with the Vatican, as a result the Greek Catholic Church ceased exist in Czechoslovakia and the clergy and faithful were meant to became the members of the Orthodox Church.1 In fact only a small part of the Greek Catholic clergy succumbed to power pressure and accepted Orthodoxy. Church leaders, as well as many priests who refused to change to the Orthodox have been arrested and sentenced to many years of punishment. The other Greek-Catholic clergy and their families were deported to the Czech lands and were forbidden to perform a duty of priestly ministry and banned from staying in eastern Slovakia for several years.
    [Show full text]
  • The Crusader Bulletin of the Eucharistic Crusade for Children in Australia #342
    The Crusader Bulletin of the Eucharistic Crusade for Children in Australia #342 Read inside: December 2019: ADVENT - The Little Flower p. 4 Month of the Holy Child Jesus - Eucharistic devotion p. 6 - The life of the Blessed Virgin Mary p. 8 - The Old Testament: Cain & Abel p. 10 - Kindness: the Bloom of Charity p. 12 - Holy Souls Corner p. 13 - My Catholic Faith - Calvary p. 14 - Liturgy this month p. 19 2 The Crusader December 2019 The Saint Saint Stephen of the Protomartyr month († 35) he Jewish origin of Saint Stephen is his own fate, defended Christ before the universally acknowledged; he is Jerusalem tribunal with a perfection which T known and loved everywhere as the enraged the proud authorities of Jerusalem, first follower of Christ to give to his mar- unwilling to recognise a humble carpenter tyred God love for love, blood for blood. It of Nazareth for their Saviour. He boldly is not certain whether he was among the upbraided the chief priests with their hard- seventy-two disciples of Jesus; some be- hearted resistance to the Holy Spirit. And lieve he was of the Greek tongue and not a when he accused them of putting to death, native of Palestine. He studied with Saint just as their forebears had treated the Paul and Saint Barnabas under the famous prophets who foretold Him, the long- Doctor of the Law, Gamaliel, who, being a awaited Just One announced by Moses, member of the Sanhedrin, attempted to they stoned him without further delay stop the persecution of the Apostles. (Acts (Acts of the Apostles, chapter 7).
    [Show full text]
  • Service-Learning in Japan
    CH •X ANG DF E P w Click to buy NOW! w m o w c .d k. ocu•trac SERVICE LEARNING IN ASIA: Pedagogy and Networking 2007 Tunghai University Service Learning Conference 9th March Service•Learning in Japan Michio Matsuura President & Takaaki David Ito Dean of Student (~March 2007) Director, International Centre (April 2007~) St. Andrew's University, Momoyama Gakuin CH •X ANG DF E P w Click to buy NOW! w m o w c .d k. ocu•trac Momoyama Gakuin University •Mission:"Fostering Citizens of the World" •An Anglican University in Japan •Social Science Orientation: –No Science Faculty •Active in International Partnership for Service• Learning and Leadership •A Core Member Institution Promoting International Experiential Education in Japanese Higher Education CH •X ANG DF E P w Click to buy NOW! w m o w c .d k. ocu•trac Japanese University Education (Historical Perspective) • 19/20 Century: Education for Bureaucracy – Training for Powerful Administrator – Nation(=People) Serves, State(=Bureaucrat) Rules • Post WW2: Education for Growth – Power Orientation; Personal Achievements • Late 20 Century: Professionalism – "Service" as Practicum for Professional Qualifications • 20/21 Century: Citizenship Education – Community Service – International Service Learning CH •X ANG DF E P w Click to buy NOW! w m o w c .d k. ocu•trac Curriculum of Service•Learning (1: Core / Professional) Core Professional Education Education CH •X ANG DF E P w Click to buy NOW! w m o w c .d k. ocu•trac Curriculum of Service•Learning (2: Value Edu / Practical Edu) Practical Education Value Education CH •X ANG DF E P w Click to buy NOW! w m o w c .d k.
    [Show full text]
  • Come and See
    Members of the Mother Teresa tried to convince Linda Corporation and the Schaefer to become a nun in 1995, but instead, the Come 2016 Board Of Directors great humanitarian gave Schaefer rare permission to of Catholic Charities of document the work in Calcutta during her six- month Harrisburg: stay in the city where Mother Teresa founded the and See... Bishop Ronald Gainer, D.D., Missionaries of Charity. A Community J.C.L As a result of that auspicious journey, Schaefer Gathering to Support Mark A. Totaro, PH.D. has had two books published based on personal Linda Schaefer Catholic Charities’ Very Reverend David L. journey with Mother Teresa, and a second book that includes interviews Danneker, PH.D., V.G. with priests and one of her sisters who worked with Blessed Teresa of Homes For Healing Reverend Daniel C. Mitzel Calcutta for over two decades. She is presently writing a third book which will include numerous other interviews from over 21 years of meeting A Benefit Dinner Mr. Brian P. Downey, Esq people who had known or worked with the humanitarian. Schaefer has Mr. Joseph F. Schatt spoken for over 1,000 audiences since 1998. Her first Catholic Charities Featuring Ms. Zenoria McMorris Owens in Harrisburg, PA in 2006 led to additional Catholic Charities fund raising Guest Speaker Mr. Richard Berrones speaking engagements including: Spokane, WA, Dallas, TX and Reno, NV. Linda Schaefer Mrs. Maria DiSanto In early December of 2015, Schaefer once again visited the motherhouse where Mother Teresa is now buried. On her first day in Mr. David S.
    [Show full text]
  • January 2009 the Real Reason for the Society's Stand the State Of
    THE ANGELUS ENGLISH-LANGUAGE ARTICLE REPRINT Let your speech be “Yes, yes: no, no”; whatever is beyond these comes from the evil one. (Mt. 5:37) January 2009 Reprint #84 THE STATE OF NECEssITY In a letter dated July 8, 1987, Archbishop Lefebvre Rome’s extended hand, and, following its founder, the wrote to Cardinal Ratzinger: “The permanent will to Society of St. Pius X always remains ready to respond annihilate Tradition is a suicidal will, which justifies, favorably to the opportunity of these discussions with by its very existence, true and faithful Catholics when the authorities of the hierarchy. But these contacts have they make the decisions necessary for the survival of only one goal: to let the pure and integral voice of the Church and the salvation of souls.”1 In his homily Catholic Tradition be heard in Rome so that it might on the day of the episcopal consecrations of June 30, recover its rights in the whole Church. The discussions 1988, the Archbishop returned to this rule, from which will be in vain for as long as Rome maintains in he deduced the legitimacy of his actions. “Thus,” he principle the corrupted teachings of the Second Vatican explained, “we find ourselves in a case of necessity.... Council. This is why we are convinced that, by the act of these Things stand thus because the liturgical and consecrations today, we are obeying...the call of God.”2 doctrinal Tradition reigning prior to Vatican II is not just one form of Catholic expression among others in The Real Reason the Church.
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORICAL ESSAYS About the Armenian Catholic Community in Armenia, Georgia and Oriental Europe
    HISTORICAL ESSAYS About the Armenian Catholic Community in Armenia, Georgia and Oriental Europe. Written by S. E. Archbishop Nerses Der-Nersessian 1. ORIGIN OF CATHOLICS IN ARMENIA The story of Armenian Catholics in Armenia and the Caucasus is long. There is no doubt that their roots go back many centuries and involve an interminable and controversial Christology concerning the Chalcedonies tradition. Historically, the Armenian Catholic community was characterized by migrations, which took place in the first quarter of the nineteenth century after the Russian– Turkish Adrianupol Alliance (1829). Seeking to escape the brutal conditions of the Ottoman Empire, Armenian Catholics left cities such as Karin-Erzerum, Alashkert and Mush and found sanctuary within the Russian Empire. New villages were created and the church was stabilized in the Shirak, Tashir and Lori regions of modern day Armenia, as well as in Javakhk, currently the Georgian provinces of Akhaltsikhe, Akhalkalaki and Ninodzminda (formerly Bogdanovka). Churches, schools and hospitals were built, organized by clergies and priests. They contributed to the Armenian Catholic Hierarchy with diocesan members and prominent monks educated in Mechitarist Congregation of Venice and Vienna and in Patriarchal Convent of Bzommar in Lebanon. The Armenian Catholic Church enjoyed a glorious century. Near the end of the nineteenth century, the Holy Seat of Rome created an ecclesiastical organization, and with the blessing of Russia’s imperial czarist government, designated the city of Saratov as the Armenian Catholics’ center. In 1909, Reverend Sarghis Der-Abrahamian [born Alexandrapol (currently Gümri) 1868, died Rome as an Archbishop 1952] was nominated Apostolic Administrator for Armenian Catholics in the Caucasus.
    [Show full text]