DOCSLIB.ORG

GEF 6956 MTR Report 20190919 Final.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
GEF 6956 MTR Report 20190919 Final.Pdf Midterm Review Report UNDP-GEF Project: Sixth Operational Phase of the GEF Small Grants Programme in Egypt GEF Project ID: 6956 UNDP Project ID: 5471 Country: Egypt Region: Arab States Focal Area: Multi-focal area (GEF-6): Biodiversity, Land Degradation, Climate Change GEF Agency: United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) Executing Agency: United Nations Office for Project Services (UNOPS) Date Version Comments 25 August 2019 1 First draft 19 September 2019 2 Final Midterm Review Report, 2019 Sixth Operational Phase of the GEF Small Grants Programme in Egypt UNDP PIMS ID: 5471; GEF Project ID: 6956 Opening Page PROJECT DETAILS: Project Name: Sixth Operational Phase of the GEF Small Grants Programme in Egypt Project ID: UNDP PIMS ID: 5471 GEF Project ID: 6956 Country: Egypt Region: Arab States Focal Area: Multi-focal area (GEF-6): Biodiversity, Land Degradation, Climate Change Focal Area Objective/ Program: BD-4: Mainstream Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Use into Production Landscapes/Seascapes and Sectors; Program 9: Managing the Human- Biodiversity Interface CCM-2: Demonstrate systematic impacts of mitigation options; Program 3: Promote integrated low-emission urban systems LD-3: Integrated Landscapes: Reduce pressures on natural resources from competing land uses in the wide landscape; Program 4: Scaling-up sustainable land management through the Landscape Approach Funding Source: GEF Trust Fund Implementing Agency: United Nations Development Programme Implementation Modality: Agency Implemented Executing Agency: UNOPS FINANCIALS: Project Preparation Grant: USD 70,000 GEF Project Grant: USD 2,843,241 Cofinancing Total: USD 4,073,461 GEF Agency Fees: USD 270,108 Total Cost: USD 6,986,702 PROJECT TIMELINE: Received by GEF: 13 August 2014 Preparation Grant Approved: 28 April 2015 Concept Approved: 01 June 2015 Project Approved for 12 December 2016 Implementation: State Date: 24 April 2017 Closing Date (Planned): 24 April 2021 MIDTERM REVIEW DETAILS: Midterm Review Timeframe: July-August 2019 MTR Consultant: James Lenoci, International Consultant MTR Reporting Language: English Acknowledgements: The MTR Consultant would like to acknowledge the information and feedback provided by interviewed project stakeholders, including the officials from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Ministry of Environment, the NSC members, the UNDP resident representative and country office staff, Country Program Management Unit staff, the National Host Institutions staff, the UNDP Global Coordinator for the SGP UCP, UNOPS staff and landscape level stakeholders visited and interviewed during the MTR mission. GEF 6956 MTR_report_20190919_final Midterm Review Report, 2019 Sixth Operational Phase of the GEF Small Grants Programme in Egypt UNDP PIMS ID: 5471; GEF Project ID: 6956 Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................................. i Abbreviations and Acronyms ........................................................................................................................................... vii 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose of the Review ...................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Scope and Methodology ................................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Structure of the Report ..................................................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Rating Scales ..................................................................................................................................................... 2 1.5 Ethics ................................................................................................................................................................. 2 1.6 Audit Trail.......................................................................................................................................................... 2 1.7 Limitations ........................................................................................................................................................ 2 2 Project Description .................................................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Development Context ....................................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Problems the Project Sought to Address .......................................................................................................... 3 2.3 Project Description and Strategy ...................................................................................................................... 4 2.4 Implementation Arrangements ........................................................................................................................ 5 2.5 Project Timing and Milestones ......................................................................................................................... 6 2.6 Main Stakeholders ............................................................................................................................................ 6 3 Findings ...................................................................................................................................................................... 7 3.1 Project Strategy ................................................................................................................................................ 7 3.1.1 Project Design ............................................................................................................................................... 7 3.1.2 Results Framework ..................................................................................................................................... 10 3.1.3 Gender Mainstreaming and Social Inclusion Analysis ................................................................................ 14 3.2 Progress towards Results ................................................................................................................................ 15 3.2.1 Progress towards Outcomes Analysis ......................................................................................................... 15 3.2.2 Remaining Barriers to Achieving the Project Objective .............................................................................. 26 3.3 Project Implementation and Adaptive Management ..................................................................................... 27 3.3.1 Management Arrangements ...................................................................................................................... 27 3.3.2 Work Planning ............................................................................................................................................ 28 3.3.3 Finance and Cofinance ............................................................................................................................... 28 3.3.4 Project-level Monitoring and Evaluation Systems ...................................................................................... 30 3.3.5 Stakeholder Engagement and Partnerships ............................................................................................... 31 3.3.6 Reporting .................................................................................................................................................... 32 3.3.7 Communications and Knowledge Management ........................................................................................ 32 3.4 Sustainability ................................................................................................................................................... 34 3.4.1 Financial Risks to Sustainability .................................................................................................................. 34 3.4.2 Socioeconomic Risks to Sustainability ........................................................................................................ 35 3.4.3 Institutional Framework and Governance Risks to Sustainability .............................................................. 35 3.4.4 Environmental Risks to Sustainability ......................................................................................................... 36 4 Conclusions and Recommendations ........................................................................................................................ 36 4.1 Conclusions ..................................................................................................................................................... 36 4.2 Recommendations .......................................................................................................................................... 37 Annex 1: MTR Mission Itinerary Annex 2: List of Persons Interviewed Annex 3: List of Documents Reviewed Annex 4: Evaluation Matrix Annex 6: Progress towards Results Annex 6: Suggested Modifications to Project Results
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Construction Projects Sector - Q4 2018 Report
    Construction Projects Sector - Q4 2018 Report Construction Projects 4 (2018) Report American Chamber of Commerce in Egypt - Business Information Center 1 of 20 Construction Projects Sector - Q4 2018 Report Special Remarks The Construction Projects Q4 2018 report provides a comprehensive overview of the Construction Projects sector with List of sub-sectors focus on top tenders, big projects and important news. Administrative Buildings Bridges Tenders Section Earthmoving Works Hospitals - Integrated Jobs (Having a certain engineering component) - sorted by Hotels & Tourist Development - Generating Sector (the sector of the client who issued the tender and who would pay for the goods & services ordered) Integrated works - Client Parks & Landscaping Renovation, Concrete Treatment & Paints Residential Buildings - Supply Jobs River Ports - Generating Sector Roads Construction - Client Schools & Other Educational Buildings Sea Ports Non-Tenders Section Steel Structure, Possible Prefab - Business News - Projects Awards - Projects in Pre-Tendering Phase - Privatization and Investments - Published Co. Performance - Loans & Grants - Fairs and Exhibitions This report includes tenders with bid bond greater than L.E. 50,000 and valuable tenders without bid bond Tenders may be posted under more than one sub-sector Copyright Notice Copyright ©2018, American Chamber of Commerce in Egypt (AmCham). All rights reserved. Neither the content of the Tenders Alert Service (TAS) nor any part of it may be reproduced, sorted in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the American Chamber of Commerce in Egypt. In no event shall AmCham be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits.
    [Show full text]
  • The Giant Projects.Pdf
    State Information Service Information Sector Contents Preface: Chapter One: The New Suez Canal 6 Chapter Two: Suez Canal Corridor Development Project 22 Chapter Three: 1.5 million Feddans Project 38 Chapter Four: The National Project for Developing Sinai 48 Chapter Five: National Roads Project 82 Chapter Six: The National Project for Developing Upper Egypt Governorates 94 Chapter Seven: Establishing New Generation of Inhabited Cities 104 Chapter Eight: National Social Housing Project 110 Chapter Nine: Other National Projects 126 First: National Project for Electricity 126 Second: Al-Galala Plateau Project 129 Third: The Golden Triangle Project 130 Fourth: The Northwest Coast Development Project 131 Fih: Logistics Center for Storage and Handling of Grains 134 Sixth: Toshka project 135 Seventh: Sharq al-Owaynat Project 136 Eighth: The National Project for Fish Culture 137 Ninth: National Program for Technological Incubators (Intilac) 149 Introduction The mega national projects are generally distinguished for being comprehensive and widespread all over the country, thus contributing to realizing economic balance, establishing basis of social justice, reducing unemployment, and redistributing population to several new cities nationwide. The mega national projects are considered the locomotive of the sustainable development. In this respect, the New Suez Canal, which was totally setup in one year (August 2015-August 2016), with 100% national finance, had a direct and indirect impact concerning increasing the GDP on the one hand, and activating the movement of trade and aracting foreign investments on the other hand, As regards the national project of developing the Suez Canal Corridor, this project mainly aims at increasing the job opportunities and turning the Suez Canal into a global center for maritime navigation and logistic services, an industrial center and a gate for the trade exchange between the east and the west.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Population Growth on Youth Employment and School Education in Egypt an Analytical Paper
    The Impact of Population Growth on Youth Employment and School Education in Egypt An Analytical Paper STATISTICS in FOCUS ISSUE 1/2017 Supported by Contents 1 Introduction 4 2 National Level Analysis 5 2.1 Population Trends (2001-2031) 5 2.2 Education 8 2.3 Employment 13 2.3.1 Youth Unemployment 13 2.3.2 Economic Dependency Ratios 14 2.3.3 Employment Market Projections 15 3 Regional Level Analysis 16 3.1 Population 16 3.2 Education 19 3.2.1 Literacy 19 3.2.2 Primary Education 19 3.2.3 Preparatory Education 22 3.3 Employment 24 3.3.1 Youth Unemployment 25 3.3.2 Economic Dependency Ratio 26 This ‘Statistics in Focus’ is jointly produced by researchers at CAPMAS with the technical support from UNICEF Egypt and 4 Recommendations 28 UNICEF Middle East and North Africa Regional Office. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not neces- 4.1 National Level 28 sarily reflect the views and the policies of CAPMAS or UNICEF. Readers are encouraged to quote and reproduce analysis 4.2 Upper Egypt 28 and figures from this Statistics in Focus; in return, CAPMAS and UNICEF request due acknowledgment and citation. Recommended citation: CAPMAS and UNICEF Egypt. The Impact of Population Growth on Youth Employment and School Education in Egypt: An Analytical Paper. Statistics in Focus 2017 (1). 1 2 Tables Figures Table 3.1: Population Estimates and Population Growth in Upper Egypt by Governorate (Millions) 2006-2014 17 Figure 2.1: Population Estimates and Projections (Millions), 2001-2031 5 Table 3.2: Total Population for Children Under 18
    [Show full text]
  • Changing Perspectives on Responsible Heritage Site Management: the Case of Luxor City, Egypt
    CHANGING PERSPECTIVES ON RESPONSIBLE HERITAGE SITE MANAGEMENT: THE CASE OF LUXOR CITY, EGYPT Perspectivas em mudança sobre a gestão responsável de sítios de patrimônio: o caso da Cidade de Luxor, Egito Eman Shokry Hesham* Inken Baller** ABSTRACT This paper aims to enhance critical awareness about the development of heritage site management, specifically focusing on archaeological sites and their adjacent communities in Egypt. To what extent does heritage site management assume responsibility for local communities? For their identity? And for tourism practices? This paper uses the heritage impact assessment tool developed by ICOMOS to assess the management systems and the heritage influence of the UNESCO World Heritage Site “Ancient Thebes with its Necropolis” on the modern-day city of Luxor, Egypt. This tool proposes a set of recommendations for local and national authorities to develop action plans that safeguard the living history of the area around the site. The results suggest ways in which the tool could be improved by enhancing mitigation strategies for tourism-related impacts and re-identifying the variables of Egyptian archaeological sites in order to develop more responsible models of local community identity and visitor awareness. Keywords: heritage management plans; heritage impact assessment; World Heritage Site; mitigation strategies; Luxor City * Doctoral student. Brandenburg University of Technology (BTU). E-mail: [email protected] ** Architect. Professor at Brandenburg University of Technology (BTU). História: Questões & Debates, Curitiba, volume 66, n.1, p. 141-165, jan./jun. 2018 142 HESHAM, E. S. e BALLER, I. Changing perspectives on responsible heritage site management... RÉSUMÉ Ce texte a pour objectif de stimuler une conscientisation critique au sujet du développement du management de sites patrimoniaux, notamment dans le cas de sites archéologiques et de leurs communautés avoisinantes en Égypte.
    [Show full text]
  • National Feasibility Study & Roadmap for Riverbank
    SUPPORTING INNOVATION IN WATER & WASTEWATER IN EGYPT NATIONAL FEASIBILITY STUDY & ROADMAP FOR RIVERBANK FILTRATION IN EGYPT CAIRO 2018 (REVISED) 2020 RBF Unit, Sohag, Egypt - ©2021 COPYRIGHT AND DISCLAIMER Copyright © United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat) 2020 All rights reserved United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat) P.O. Box 30030 00100 Nairobi GPO KENYA Tel: 254-020-7623120 (Central Office) www.ar.unhabitat.org DISCLAIMER The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any county, territory, city or area or its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries regarding its economic system or degree of development. Excerpts may be reproduced without authorization, on condition that the source is indicated. Views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of the United Nations Human Settlements Programme, the United Nations and its member states. i National Feasibility Study and roadmap for River Bank Filtration in Egypt NATIONAL FEASIBILITY STUDY AND ROADMAP FOR RIVER BANK FILTRATION IN EGYPT FEASIBILITY STUDY REPORT PARTNERS COORDINATORS The initial version of this report was produced under Hyat Inclusive and Sustainable Local Economic Development Project in partnership with the Egyptian Ministry for Local Development, the Egyptian Ministry for Housing, Utilities and Urban Communities, the Egyptian Holding Company for Water and Wastewater and the United Nations Human Settlement’s Programme (UN Habitat). Funded by the United Nations Trust Fund for Human Security and UN Habitat. CONTACT DETAILS Holding Company for Water and Wastewater (HCWW) Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • 200 MW Photovoltaic Power Project Kom Ombo – Aswan Arab Republic of Egypt
    200 MW Photovoltaic Power Project Kom Ombo – Aswan Arab Republic of Egypt Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Volume 2 – Main text Prepared for: March 2020 DOCUMENT INFORMATION PROJECT NAME 200 MW Photovoltaic Power Plant, Kom Ombo, Egypt 5CS PROJECT NUMBER 1305/001/068 DOCUMENT TITLE Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Report CLIENT ACWA Power 5CS PROJECT MANAGER Reem Jabr 5CS PROJECT DIRECTOR Ken Wade ISSUE AND REVISION RECORD VERSION DATE DESCRIPTION AUTHOR REVIEWER APPROVER 1 02/03/2020 Version 1 RMJ/MKB MKB/RMJ KRW Regardless of location, mode of delivery or 1 Financial Capital function, all organisations are dependent on 2 Social Capital The 5 Capitals of Sustainable Development to enable long term delivery of its products or services. 3 Natural Capital Sustainability is at the heart of everything that 4 Manufactured Capital 5 Capitals achieves. Wherever we work, we strive to provide our clients with the means to maintain and enhance these stocks of capital 5 Human Capital assets. DISCLAIMER 5 Capitals cannot accept responsibility for the consequences of This document is issued for the party which commissioned it and for this document being relied upon by any other party, or being used specific purposes connected with the above-identified project only. It for any other purpose. This document contains confidential information and proprietary should not be relied upon by any other party or used for any other intellectual property. It should not be shown to other parties without purpose consent from the
    [Show full text]
  • UNIDO Activities in Egypt 2017 – 2018
    UNIDO activities in Egypt 2017 – 2018 INCLUSIVE AND SUSTAINABLE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT Table of Contents Abbreviations ..................................................................................................................................5 Inclusive and Sustainable Industrial Development ............................................................................7 UNIDO in Egypt ................................................................................................................................ 8 Programmes in Egypt ...................................................................................................................... 11 Key results at a glance 2017 – 2018 ................................................................................................. 12 Creating Shared Prosperity ............................................................................................................ 15 Inclusive and sustainable local economic development: Hayat ................................................... 17 Youth employability and entreprenership in Upper Egypt: Imkan ................................................. 21 Promoting women’s empowerment for inclusive and sustainable development ..........................25 Advancing economic competitiveness .......................................................................................... 29 Green Trade Initiative ................................................................................................................. 31 Developing cultural
    [Show full text]
  • Hesham Farouk Ali Associate Professor | Computers & Systems Dept
    Hesham Farouk Ali Associate professor | Computers & Systems Dept. | Electronics Research Institute Research & Innovation Acting Manager | Information Technology Institute (ITI) | Ministry of Communication and Information Technology (MCIT) 12 Saleh Harb St., 7th. District, Nasr City, Cairo, Egypt., Mobile: +201-006087180: [email protected] [email protected] Career Seeking a challenging position in a warehouse where my stock-picking skills can be put to good use in Research, strategic management, Objective Planning, business development. Education Cairo University, Egypt Ph.D. 1996 – 2001 Electronics & Communication Dept. Faculty of Engineering. M.Sc. 1993 – 1996 Electronics & Communication Dept. Faculty of Engineering. B.Sc. 1986 – 1991 Electronics & Communication Dept. Faculty of Engineering. Innovation Guide, IMP3rove academy coaching program, EU 2013 Certificates Intel Ideation camp coaching 2013 Soft skills workshop 2005 Management course , IESA Univ. Spain 2006 CCNA Certification 2002 – 2003 eContent Research Interest Signal processing. Image processing, Compression, Enhancement. Video processing, Compression, indexing, retrieval. Interactive Video on Demand. Pattern Recognition. Mobile technology The prize of Arab Federation of Library and Information 2009 Awards for the best project of the year. Dar Elwathaek project The Best Ph.D. thesis 2006 Helwan Univ., Cairo, Egypt. (under my supervision) Honor certificates for teaching and project supervision 1997-2002 From AUC.,for more than 12 terms Page 1 of 8 National
    [Show full text]
  • Food Safety Inspection in Egypt Institutional, Operational, and Strategy Report
    FOOD SAFETY INSPECTION IN EGYPT INSTITUTIONAL, OPERATIONAL, AND STRATEGY REPORT April 28, 2008 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Cameron Smoak and Rachid Benjelloun in collaboration with the Inspection Working Group. FOOD SAFETY INSPECTION IN EGYPT INSTITUTIONAL, OPERATIONAL, AND STRATEGY REPORT TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FOR POLICY REFORM II CONTRACT NUMBER: 263-C-00-05-00063-00 BEARINGPOINT, INC. USAID/EGYPT POLICY AND PRIVATE SECTOR OFFICE APRIL 28, 2008 AUTHORS: CAMERON SMOAK RACHID BENJELLOUN INSPECTION WORKING GROUP ABDEL AZIM ABDEL-RAZEK IBRAHIM ROUSHDY RAGHEB HOZAIN HASSAN SHAFIK KAMEL DARWISH AFKAR HUSSAIN DISCLAIMER: The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...................................................................................... 1 INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK ......................................................................... 3 Vision 3 Mission ................................................................................................................... 3 Objectives .............................................................................................................. 3 Legal framework..................................................................................................... 3 Functions...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • New Gourna Village Conservation and Communıty New Gourna Village: Conservation and Communıty
    New Gourna Village Conservation and Communıty New Gourna Village: Conservation and Communıty March 2011 Acknowledgements This assessment was undertaken by World Monuments Fund (WMF) with the support of the Robert W. Wilson Challenge to Conserve our Heritage, and in collaboration with the UNESCO World Heritage Centre and the Luxor Governorate of Egypt. The WMF Project Team that carried out the survey and compiled the assessment report included Erica Avrami (WMF Project Manager); Jeff Allen, Gina Haney, Heba Hosny, Eta’ El Hosseiny, and Sarah Badea (all of Community Consortium); and William Raynolds (WMF Consultant). An accompanying film was produced by WMF in collaboration with Community Consortium, directed by Oliver Wilkins and with interviews and translations by Mostafa Naguib. The film, Hassan Fathy’s New Gourna Village: Past, Present and Future, is available at http://www.wmf.org/project/new-gourna-village The UNESCO physical survey team (Mahmoud Qutb, Nevine George, Heba Hosny, and Dalia Magdy) kindly provided the base plan used in this report. The Aga Khan Trust for Culture kindly provided historic images for the assessment and the film. Photography for the report was by Community Consortium, with additional images provided by Mostafa Naguib, Erica Avrami/WMF, and Hubert Guillaud/CRAterre-ENSAG. Graphic design of this report was by Ken Feisel, WMF Art Director. Editorial assistance was provided by Maria Golia. Special thanks go to the residents of New Gourna, who opened their homes to the assessment team and shared their stories. Their interest and cooperation are a testament to Hassan Fathy’s vision for a thriving community and to the shared hope for its future.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation Report
    PROVISION FOR POST PROJECT EVALUATIONS FOR THE UNITED NATIONS DEMOCRACY FUND Contract NO.PD:C0110/10 EVALUATION REPORT UDF-EGY-09-388– Enlarging the Social Base for Democracy and the Rule of Law in Egypt Date: 18 December 2014 Acknowledgements The evaluators would like to thank the Cairo Institute for Human Rights Studies which took the time to share its experience and information with the evaluation team, as well as the project beneficiaries who were interviewed. All errors and omissions remain the responsibility of the authors. Disclaimer The views expressed in this report are those of the evaluators. They do not represent those of UNDEF or of any of the institutions referred to in the report. Authors This report was written by Landis MacKellar and Shaima Andrassy , Quality and Evaluation Manager at Transtec. Mr. Eric Tourres was Project Director at Transtec. Table of Contents I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................1 II. INTRODUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT CONTEXT ..........................................................................................6 i. The project and evaluation objectives ............................................................................................6 (ii) Evaluation methodology .................................................................................................................6 (iii) Development context .....................................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Environmental and Social Impacts ______27 5.1 Introduction ______Error! Bookmark Not Defined
    Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Submitted to : Egyptian Natural Gas Holding Company EGAS ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK Prepared by: Executive Summary Public Disclosure Authorized NATURAL GAS CONNECTION PROJECT IN 20 GOVERNORATES IN EGYPT (January 2017) Executive summary 1 List of acronyms and abbreviations AFD Agence Française de Développement (French Agency for Development) BUTAGASCO The Egyptian Company for LPG distribution CAPMAS Central Agency for Public Mobilization and Statistics EHDR Egyptian Human Development Report 2010 EEAA Egyptian Environmental Affairs Agency EGAS Egyptian Natural Gas Holding Company EGP Egyptian pound ESDV Emergency Shut Down Valve ESIAF Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Framework ESMMF Environmental and Social Management and Monitoring Framework ESMP Environmental and Social Management Plan FGD Focus Group Discussion GoE Government of Egypt HP High Pressure HSE Health Safety and Environment LDC Local Distribution Companies LPG Liquefied Petroleum Gas LP Low Pressure mBar milliBar NG Natural Gas NGO Non-Governmental Organizations PAP Project Affected Persons PRS Pressure Reduction Station QRA Quantitative Risk Assessment RAP Resettlement Action Plan RPF Resettlement Policy Framework SDO Social Development Officer SFD Social Fund for Development SSIAF Supplementary Social Impact Assessment Framework TOR Terms of Reference Town Gas The Egyptian Company for Natural Gas Distribution for Cities WB The World Bank US $ United
    [Show full text]