USAID Power Africa Toolbox
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
3. the Achievements of AGOA
3. the achievementS oF AGOA ten years of Growth increase and accounted for 91.6 percent of AGOA exports in 2011 (figure 3 and 4). The AGOA share When AGOA is looked at in its entirety, the value of of total U.S. imports, an amount totaling $2.19 products coming into the U.S. has shown relatively trillion in 2011, although still relatively small as strong growth. Exports from AGOA beneficiaries an aggregate number, grew from 0.7 percent to 2.5 were $53.8 billion in 2011. This represents a 21.5 percent during this 10-year period.11 In addition, percent increase in AGOA exports from 2010 and during the last 10 years, on average more than 70 a more than 500 percent increase from the initial percent of Sub-Saharan Africa’s exports to the U.S. $8.15 billion in AGOA exports in 2001 as shown have been duty free under AGOA or GSP. in figure 2. Mineral fuels and crude oil drove this Figure 2. exportS From AGOA BeneFiciarieS: totaL exportS and AGOA and gSp eLigiBLe, 2001-2011 90 80 70 60 Total Exports from 50 AGOA Beneficiaries Billions 40 AGOA + GSP Exports 30 20 10 0 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 11 These data were compiled from the U.S. International Trade Commission Tariff and Trade’s DataWeb. The data at this Web site are compiled us- ing tariff and trade data from the U.S. Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission. Unless otherwise noted, import data are categorized as U.S. -
Liberia Short Mission Brief
Liberia Short Mission Brief I. Activity Summary Overview Nearly 25 years of international peace missions in Liberia offer lessons of how multilateral cooperation, focused effort and resolute action can end conflict and keep peace in a troubled neighborhood. Indeed, since 2003 UNMIL has kept the peace. Yet, over this same period, and even going back to the earlier interventions, misaligned interests among the dominant actors and missed opportunities have plagued the missions. In particular, peace missions have done precious little to address, let alone solve, the central drivers of Liberia’s conflict, strengthen local institutions or assist the process of rebuilding trust between the government and the Liberian people. This suggests there are limitations of peace missions as vehicles for state building and development, at least as the missions are currently structured. As the UN moves to shutter UNMIL this becomes particularly visible, along with the broader challenges of closing a mission amid pervasive instability. Background Liberia has suffered from successive, regionally interconnected wars that, at various times, directly included neighboring Sierra Leone, Guinea, and Côte d’Ivoire, while indirectly involving many other states such as Burkina Faso and Libya, in addition to a plethora of near-constantly morphing non-state armed groups. The conflict killed at least tens of thousands[i]. One in four Liberians were displaced.[ii] The economy contracted by 90%.[iii] Life expectancy bottomed out at less than 50 years[iv]. Illiteracy and unemployment skyrocketed. Even today, after 12 years of UNMIL-enforced peace, 84% of Liberians continue to live on less than $1.25/day[v]. -
Operation Update Report Southern Africa: Drought (Food Insecurity)
Operation Update Report Southern Africa: Drought (Food Insecurity) Emergency appeal n°: MDR63003 GLIDE n°: __ Operation update n° 3: 15 February 2021 Timeframe covered by this update: September 2020 – December 2020 Operation start date: 11 December 2019 Operation timeframe and end date: 17 months, 31 May 2021 Funding requirements: CHF 7.4 million DREF amount initially allocated: CHF 768,800 N° of people targeted: Botswana: 7,750 - Eswatini: 25,000 - Lesotho: 23,000 - Namibia: 18,000 Total: 73,750 people (14,750 households) Red Cross Red Crescent Movement partners currently actively involved in the operation: American Red Cross, British Red Cross; Canadian Red Cross; Finnish Red Cross; Netherlands Red Cross; Spanish Red Cross; Swedish Red Cross Other partner organizations actively involved in the operation: Governments of Botswana, Eswatini, Lesotho and Namibia; Government of Japan. Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida), United States Agency for International Development (USAID); World Food Programme (WFP); Food and Agricultural Organisation (FAO); GIZ; and UNICEF. <Please click here for the budget and here for the contacts> Summary: This operation update reflects the current situation and information available since the last operation update published in September 2020. The operation timeframe will be extended by one month to end on 31 May 2021 to allow for a final evaluation to be completed. Simultaneously, as needs persist and the funding gap in 2020 allowed to reach less than half of the targeted people in many places, extending the operation further beyond May is being discussed. Following discussions with the National Societies and estimates of needs and possible activities, a new operation update may be published to extend the timeframe or the Emergency Appeal may be revised should a change of activities be foreseen. -
The Role of Civil Society in National Reconciliation and Peacebuilding in Liberia
International Peace Academy The Role of Civil Society in National Reconciliation and Peacebuilding in Liberia by Augustine Toure APRIL 2002 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The International Peace Academy wishes to acknowledge the support provided by the Government of the Netherlands which made the research and publication of this study possible. ABOUT IPA’S CIVIL SOCIETY PROGRAM This report forms part of IPA’s Civil Society Project which, between 1998 and 1999, involved case studies on the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), Liberia, Sierra Leone and Guinea-Bissau. IPA held a seminar, in partnership with the Organization of African Unity (OAU), in Cape Town in 1996 on “Civil Society and Conflict Management in Africa” consisting largely of civil society actors from all parts of Africa. An IPA seminar organized in partnership with the Council for the Development of Social Science Research in Africa (CODESRIA) in Senegal in December 1999 on “War, Peace and Reconciliation in Africa” prominently featured civil society actors from all of Africa’s sub-regions. In the current phase of its work, IPA Africa Program’s Peacebuilding in Africa project is centered around the UN community and involves individuals from civil society, policy, academic and media circles in New York. The project explores ways of strengthening the capacity of African actors with a particular focus on civil society, to contribute to peacemaking and peacebuilding in countries dealing with or emerging from conflicts. In implementing this project, IPA organizes a series of policy fora and Civil Society Dialogues. In 2001, IPA initiated the Ruth Forbes Young fellowship to bring one civil society representative from Africa to spend a year in New York. -
2020 09 30 USG Southern Africa Fact Sheet #3
Fact Sheet #3 Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 Southern Africa – Regional Disasters SEPTEMBER 30, 2020 SITUATION AT A GLANCE 10.5 765,000 5.4 1.7 320,000 MILLION MILLION MILLION Estimated Food- Estimated Confirmed Estimated Food-Insecure Estimated Severely Estimated Number Insecure Population in COVID-19 Cases in Population in Rural Food-Insecure of IDPs in Southern Africa Southern Africa Zimbabwe Population in Malawi Cabo Delgado IPC – Sept. 2020 WHO – Sept. 30, 2020 ZimVAC – Sept. 2020 IPC – Sept. 2020 WFP – Sept. 2020 Increasing prevalence of droughts, flooding, and other climatic shocks has decreased food production in Southern Africa, extending the agricultural lean season and exacerbating existing humanitarian needs. The COVID-19 pandemic and related containment measures have worsened food insecurity and disrupted livelihoods for urban and rural households. USG partners delivered life-saving food, health, nutrition, protection, shelter, and WASH assistance to vulnerable populations in eight Southern African countries during FY 2020. TOTAL U.S. GOVERNMENT HUMANITARIAN FUNDING USAID/BHA1,2 $202,836,889 For the Southern Africa Response in FY 2020 State/PRM3 $19,681,453 For complete funding breakdown with partners, see detailed chart on page 6 Total $222,518,3424 1USAID’s Bureau for Humanitarian Assistance (USAID/BHA) 2 Total USAID/BHA funding includes non-food humanitarian assistance from the former Office of U.S. Foreign Disaster Assistance (USAID/OFDA) and emergency food assistance from the former Office of Food for Peace (USAID/FFP). 3 U.S. Department of State’s Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration (State/PRM) 4 This total includes approximately $30,914,447 in supplemental funding through USAID/BHA and State/PRM for COVID-19 preparedness and response activities. -
Male Circumcision and HIV in Lesotho: Is the Relationship Real Or Spurious? Analysis of the 2009 Demographic and Health Survey
DHS WORKING PAPERS Male Circumcision and HIV in Lesotho: Is the Relationship Real or Spurious? Analysis of the 2009 Demographic and Health Survey Tiisetso Makatjane Thandie Hlabana Emmanuel Letete 2016 No. 125 DEMOGRAPHIC AND August 2016 HEALTH This document was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. SURVEYS Male Circumcision and HIV in Lesotho: Is the Relationship Real or Spurious? Analysis of the 2009 Demographic and Health Survey Tiisetso Makatjane1 Thandie Hlabana2 Emmanuel M. Letete3 ICF International Rockville, Maryland, USA August 2016 1 Department of Statistics and Demography 2 Department of Sociology, Anthropology and Social Work 3 Department of Economics All three are based at the National University of Lesotho Corresponding author: T. J. Makatjane, Department of Statistics and Demography, National University of Lesotho; E-mail: [email protected] or [email protected] Acknowledgments We would like to extend our heartfelt gratitude to ICF International and USAID for considering us for this opportunity and for funding us to be part of the 2016 DHS Fellows program. We are greatly indebted to our facilitators Dr. Wenjuan Wang, Dr. Shireen Assaf, Dr. Elizabeth Nansubuga, Simona Simona, and Damian Damian for their guidance and patience during this process. Our reviewer, Joy Fishel at ICF, is appreciated for valuable insights about this work. We are also grateful to our DHS Program co-fellows for their support, feedback, and humor. This has been an opportunity for growth, and we see ourselves as ambassadors of The DHS Program in Lesotho and beyond. We also want to extend our gratitude to our institution, the National University of Lesotho, Faculty of Social Sciences, for affording us the opportunity to participate in the 2016 DHS Fellows Program. -
Lessons Learned from Power-Sharing in Africa
8/2008 Lessons Learned from Power-Sharing in Africa Håvard Strand, Centre for the Study of Civil War (CSCW) Scott Gates, Centre for the Study of Civil War (CSCW) Several power-sharing agreements have been reached in Africa over the last decades. This project has compared the experiences of various forms of power-sharing in five countries, Bu- rundi, Kenya, Liberia, Nigeria, and Sierra Leone. The cases differ significantly both with regard to the implementation of power-sharing and the rationale for adopting such institutions. Our conclusions is that power-sharing institutions have proven themselves useful in some countries and less so in others. The most positive experiences have been in the peace processes of Sierra Leone and Liberia, where power-sharing played a vital role in securing peace. There are less clear support for power-sharing institutions with regard to good governance. Introduction tions. Inclusive institutions work towards inte- This project describes power-sharing efforts in grating as many voices as possible into the deci- five conflict-prone and ill-governed African sion-making body, whereas exclusive institutions countries: Burundi, Kenya, Liberia, Nigeria, and create autonomous political spheres. Sierra Leone. While these five countries are The rationale for inclusive institutions as- unique in many important ways, some overar- sumes that exclusion is a key to violent conflict, ching conclusions can nevertheless be drawn and is therefore very focused on not excluding from these studies. Our studies support the any relevant group. The inclusive answer is to conclusion that power-sharing can be a useful provide some guarantees to all parties, so that remedy under certain conditions. -
Automatic Exchange of Information: Status of Commitments
As of 27 September 2021 AUTOMATIC EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION (AEOI): STATUS OF COMMITMENTS1 JURISDICTIONS UNDERTAKING FIRST EXCHANGES IN 2017 (49) Anguilla, Argentina, Belgium, Bermuda, British Virgin Islands, Bulgaria, Cayman Islands, Colombia, Croatia, Cyprus2, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Faroe Islands, Finland, France, Germany, Gibraltar, Greece, Guernsey, Hungary, Iceland, India, Ireland, Isle of Man, Italy, Jersey, Korea, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Mexico, Montserrat, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, San Marino, Seychelles, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Turks and Caicos Islands, United Kingdom JURISDICTIONS UNDERTAKING FIRST EXCHANGES BY 2018 (51) Andorra, Antigua and Barbuda, Aruba, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan3, The Bahamas, Bahrain, Barbados, Belize, Brazil, Brunei Darussalam, Canada, Chile, China, Cook Islands, Costa Rica, Curacao, Dominica4, Greenland, Grenada, Hong Kong (China), Indonesia, Israel, Japan, Lebanon, Macau (China), Malaysia, Marshall Islands, Mauritius, Monaco, Nauru, New Zealand, Niue4, Pakistan3, Panama, Qatar, Russia, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Samoa, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Sint Maarten4, Switzerland, Trinidad and Tobago4, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, Uruguay, Vanuatu JURISDICTIONS UNDERTAKING FIRST EXCHANGES BY 2019 (2) Ghana3, Kuwait5 JURISDICTIONS UNDERTAKING FIRST EXCHANGES BY 2020 (3) Nigeria3, Oman5, Peru3 JURISDICTIONS UNDERTAKING FIRST EXCHANGES BY 2021 (3) Albania3, 7, Ecuador3, Kazakhstan6 -
Riders for Health Skoll Awardee Profile
Riders for Health Skoll Awardee Profile Organization Overview Key Info Social Entrepreneur Barry Coleman, Andrea Coleman Year Awarded 2006 Issue Area Addressed Health Sub Issue Area Addressed Health Delivery Countries Served Gambia, Kenya, Lesotho, Liberia, Nigeria, Tanzania, Zimbabwe Website https://www.riders.org/ Twitter handle ridersforhealth Facebook https://www.facebook.com/ridersforhealth Youtube http://www.youtube.com/user/RidersForHealt hTV About the Organization Riders for Health is an international NGO working to improve the capacity and efficiency of health care delivery in Africa. Riders’ vision is of a world in which no one will die of an easily preventable or curable disease because barriers of distance, terrain, or poverty prevent them from being reached. Riders’ mission is to strengthen health systems by addressing transport and logistics—one of the most neglected, yet vital, aspects of development for the health of Africa. Riders for Health manages motorcycles, ambulances, and other four-wheel vehicles used in the delivery of health care in seven countries across Africa. They work with ministries of health, international and African NGOs, private-sector organizations, local community-based organizations, and religious groups, to improve access to health care for over 21 million people. Riders’ programs provide training and employment opportunities to build local capacity. Their network of highly skilled technicians regularly travels to service vehicles in the communities that health workers serve. This means that health workers don’t waste valuable time traveling to a garage when they could be with their patients. Impact Riders for Health reports serving roughly 14 million people, with operations in the Gambia, Liberia and Lesotho, Kenya, Zimbabwe, and Nigeria. -
G U I N E a Liberia Sierra Leone
The boundaries and names shown and the designations Mamou used on this map do not imply official endorsement or er acceptance by the United Nations. Nig K o L le n o G UINEA t l e a SIERRA Kindia LEONEFaranah Médina Dula Falaba Tabili ba o s a g Dubréka K n ie c o r M Musaia Gberia a c S Fotombu Coyah Bafodia t a e r G Kabala Banian Konta Fandié Kamakwie Koinadugu Bendugu Forécariah li Kukuna Kamalu Fadugu Se Bagbe r Madina e Bambaya g Jct. i ies NORTHERN N arc Sc Kurubonla e Karina tl it Mateboi Alikalia L Yombiro Kambia M Pendembu Bumbuna Batkanu a Bendugu b Rokupr o l e Binkolo M Mange Gbinti e Kortimaw Is. Kayima l Mambolo Makeni i Bendou Bodou Port Loko Magburaka Tefeya Yomadu Lunsar Koidu-Sefadu li Masingbi Koundou e a Lungi Pepel S n Int'l Airport or a Matotoka Yengema R el p ok m Freetown a Njaiama Ferry Masiaka Mile 91 P Njaiama- Wellington a Yele Sewafe Tongo Gandorhun o Hastings Yonibana Tungie M Koindu WESTERN Songo Bradford EAS T E R N AREA Waterloo Mongeri York Rotifunk Falla Bomi Kailahun Buedu a i Panguma Moyamba a Taiama Manowa Giehun Bauya T Boajibu Njala Dambara Pendembu Yawri Bendu Banana Is. Bay Mano Lago Bo Segbwema Daru Shenge Sembehun SOUTHE R N Gerihun Plantain Is. Sieromco Mokanje Kenema Tikonko Bumpe a Blama Gbangbatok Sew Tokpombu ro Kpetewoma o Sh Koribundu M erb Nitti ro River a o i Turtle Is. o M h Sumbuya a Sherbro I. -
Phases of the MBB Liberian Initiative As It Pertains to Buduburam Former
The Liberian Initiative After an invitation by a resident of Ghana’s largest refugee camp, MBB began to contribute to the rebuilding of Liberia and its people, devastated by civil war. The invitations grew, as MBB heard from community members and leaders, the largest university, government agencies, and local NGOs and churches. MBB team members have made eight assessment and intervention visits, all self-funded or through the generosity of private donors. Through those visits, the MBB team has developed eight key interdependent components of the Liberian Initiative. The first module helped create a community mediation service and student peer mediation clubs among Liberians living at the Buduburam Settlement in Ghana. The second module involves efforts to rehabilitate, reintegrate, and restore the lives of Liberia’s former child soldiers who are residents of Buduburam. None of the former child soldiers has participated in the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration process (DDR) established by and under the direction of the UN High Commission on Refugees. MBB works, in conjunction with local partners, with these former child soldiers and with the communities that will receive them. The third module involves capacity building in Liberia. To date, MBB has provided mediation and conflict resolution training, in Ghana and Liberia, to lawyers, tribal chiefs, land administrators, police and prison officials, several NGOs’ staff, and university graduate students. The fourth module is aimed at designing and implementing interventions to address the need for trauma healing countrywide. Involving international mental health professional-partners and Liberian lay counselors, this effort will promote immediate healing and establish systems for ongoing psychological support and restoration. -
Main Data Holds/Hatches/Cranes
Vessel name Built IMO no. Flag Vessel name Built IMO no. Flag BBC Carolina 2007 9402043 Antigua & Barbuda BBC Vermont 2008 9357236 Antigua & Barbuda BBC Delaware 2007 9357212 Antigua & Barbuda BBC Florida 2009 9433286 Antigua & Barbuda BBC Maine 2007 9357200 Antigua & Barbuda Jannes 2009 9435129 Antigua & Barbuda BBC Texas 2007 9388883 Antigua & Barbuda BBC Arizona 2010 9501253 Antigua & Barbuda Louise Auerbach 2007 9388895 Liberia BBC Missouri 2010 9488035 Liberia Erik 2008 9435105 Antigua & Barbuda BBC Maryland 2010 9433298 Antigua & Barbuda Pia 2007 9384318 Antigua & Barbuda BBC Michigan 2010 9501241 Antigua & Barbuda Frieda 2008 9435117 Antigua & Barbuda BBC Illinois 2011 9465394 Thailand Lisa Auerbach 2008 9388900 Liberia BBC Kentucky 2011 9488061 Panama Leanne Auerbach 2008 9388912 Liberia Claude A. Desgagnes 2011 9488059 Barbados BBC Georgia 2008 9357224 Antigua & Barbuda MAIN DATA HOLDS/HATCHES/CRANES Vessel type Multipurpose Heavylifter Cargo hold capacity 15,952 cbm / 563,340 cbft Classification DNV-GL, Class NK, RINA, Korean Register Floor space under deck 2,810 sqm / 30,247 sqft E3 Ice classed, strengthened for heavy cargoes, Equipped for the carriage of containers Floor space on deck 1,480 sqm / 15,931 sqft GT/NT 9,620 / 4,260 Cranes 2 NMF cranes situated portside 150 mt capacity each / Deadweight (summer) 12,780 mt 300 mt capacity combined Max. draft (summer) 8.00 m Container intake 665 TEU nominal 528 TEU at 14 mt homogeneously loaded Length o.a. 138.50 m 50 reefer plugs on deck Length between pp. 130.71 m Deck strengths per sqm 16.00 mt on tanktop 2.50 mt on tweendeck in hold 1 Breadth moulded 21.00 m and hold 2 (upper position) 4.00 mt on tweendeck in hold 2 Depth to main deck 11.00 m (middle and lower position) and hold 3 1.75 mt on hatchcovers Height above keel 40.09 m Max.