DOCSLIB.ORG

Exhibit 1 Domestic a Vailable Seat Miles, 1978-2009

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Exhibit 1 Domestic a Vailable Seat Miles, 1978-2009 Exhibit 1 Domestic Available Seat Miles, 1978-2009 800 Case3:10-cv-02858-RS Document75-2Filed08/24/10Page1of151 700 600 500 les (in Billions) (in les ii 400 300 Available Seat M 200 100 - Source: Bureau of Transportation Statistics, T1 Data. CONFIDENTIAL Exhibit 2 Domestic Revenue Passenger Miles, 1978-2009 700 Case3:10-cv-02858-RS Document75-2Filed08/24/10Page2of151 600 500 400 iles (in Billions) (in iles MM 300 evenue Passenger Passenger evenue RR 200 100 - Source: Bureau of Transportation Statistics, T1 Data. CONFIDENTIAL Notes: American, Delta/Northwest, US Airways, US Delta/Northwest, American, Morris Air,Kiwi International,Valujet, ProAir,Western Pacific, Sources: LCCsjetBlue, Spirit, include Southwest, DatabaseData; Labor Statistics, HUB Bureau of Products, Real Average Yield ($) 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 1Q1990 3Q1990 1Q1991 3Q1991 1Q1992 3Q1992 and Alaska Airlines. Yields include Yields and AlaskaAirlines. 1Q1993 3Q1993 Frontier, AirTran, Allegiant, Virgin America, Frontier, AirTran, Virgin America, Allegiant, 1Q1994 1Q1990 Inflation-Adjusted Yield, – 4Q2009 3Q1994 1Q1995 3Q1995 1Q1996 Eastwind Airlines, AirSouth, 3Q1996 Consumer Price Index, series Consumer CUUR 1Q1997 3Q1997 Legacy Carriers top 1,000 city OD passengers. pairs based 1,000 on 2009 top 1Q1998 CONFIDENTIAL Exhibit 3 3Q1998 1Q1999 3Q1999 1Q2000 Sun Country,Sun ATA Airlines, VanguardAirline 3Q2000 Accessair Legacy Carr andSkybus. 1Q2001 LCCs 3Q2001 1Q2002 0000SA0, base 0000SA0, year = 2009. 3Q2002 1Q2003 3Q2003 1Q2004 3Q2004 1Q2005 3Q2005 1Q2006 iers include United, Continental, United, iers include 3Q2006 1Q2007 s, National,Independence, 3Q2007 1Q2008 3Q2008 1Q2009 3Q2009 Case3:10-cv-02858-RS Document75-2 Filed08/24/10 Page3 of 151 of Page3 Filed08/24/10 Document75-2 Case3:10-cv-02858-RS Exhibit 4 LCC and Legacy Passenger Shares, 2000 v. 2009 30% Case3:10-cv-02858-RS Document75-2Filed08/24/10Page4of151 25% 2000 2009 20% nger Shares nger ee 15% Domestic OD Pass 10% 5% 0% Southwest Delta Air American United Air US Airways Continental AirTran JetBlue Alaska Frontier Airlines Lines Airlines Lines Air Lines Airways Airways Airlines Airlines Source: Database Products, HUB data. Notes: Carrier shares for both 2000 and 2009 are combined as follows: Delta Air Lines includes Northwest, American Airlines includes Trans World Airways, US Airways includes America West Airlines, and Frontier Airlines includes Mid West Airline. Top ten carriers shown ranked by 2009 OD passengers. CONFIDENTIAL Exhibit 5 Legacy Carriers’ Exposure to LCC Competition City Pairs, 2009 Case3:10-cv-02858-RS Document75-2Filed08/24/10Page5of151 Expos ed Airline Expos ed Airline Legacy Carrier Passengers Revenue American Airlines 27,054,596 $4,918,985,059 Alaska Airlines 6,992,700 $1,046,669,320 Continental Air Lines 18,905,602 $3,364,981,357 Delta Air Lines 43,338,445 $7,427,967,744 United Air Lines 25,152,901 $4,948,761,805 US Airways 25,491,617 $4,389,147,036 % of Airline % of Airline Legacy Carrier Passengers Revenue American Airlines 59% 53% Alaska Airlines 57% 45% Continental Air Lines 71% 69% Delta Air Lines 58% 50% United Air Lines 66% 61% US Airways 61% 55% Sources: Database Products, HUB Data; Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Index, series CUUR0000SA0, base year = 2009. Notes: [1] Exposed city pairs have at least one LCC with at least a 10% share. [2] Airports in a city are grouped as follows: Chicago (MDW and ORD), Cleveland (CAK and CLE), Cincinnati (CVG and DAY), Dallas (DAL and DFW), Washington DC (BWI, DCA and IAD), Houston (HOU and IAH), Los Angeles (BUR, LAX and LGB), Miami (FLL and MIA), New York City (EWR, JFK andLGA), San Francisco (OAK and SFO) and Tampa (PIE and TPA). [3] LCC airlines in the 2009 data are jetBlue Airways (B6), Frontier Airlines (F9), AirTran Airways (FL), Allegiant Air (G4), Spirit Airlines (NK), Sun Country Airlines (SY), Virgin America (VX), and Southwest Airlines (WN). CONFIDENTIAL Vanguard Airlines, National, Note: Source: LCCs with at a city least share onpaira with 10% inquarter includeSout LCCs Database Products, HUB Data. HUB Database Products, Percentage of Passengers 40% 45% 50% 55% 60% 65% 70% 75% 80% 85% 90% Percent of Domestic Passengers on City Pairs with at least 10% LCC Share, ofDomesticPassengersonCityLCC Pairswithatleast10% Percent 1Q2000 Independence, Pro Air and Skybus. Air and Independence, Pro 2Q2000 3Q2000 4Q2000 1Q2001 2Q2001 3Q2001 4Q2001 1Q2002 2Q2002 3Q2002 4Q2002 1Q2003 2Q2003 1Q2000 – 4Q2009 hwest, Spirit, jetBlue, Frontier, AirTran, Spirit, Allegiant, hwest, Virg 3Q2003 4Q2003 CONFIDENTIAL 1Q2004 Exhibit 6 2Q2004 3Q2004 4Q2004 1Q2005 2Q2005 3Q2005 4Q2005 1Q2006 2Q2006 3Q2006 4Q2006 1Q2007 2Q2007 3Q2007 4Q2007 in America, in America, Sun Country, ATA Airlines, 1Q2008 2Q2008 3Q2008 4Q2008 1Q2009 2Q2009 3Q2009 4Q2009 Case3:10-cv-02858-RS Document75-2 Filed08/24/10 Page6 of 151 of Page6 Filed08/24/10 Document75-2 Case3:10-cv-02858-RS Exhibit 7 Entry Events on Top 1,000 City Pairs, 2000-2009 90.0% 83.2% Case3:10-cv-02858-RS Document75-2Filed08/24/10Page7of151 80.0% 70.0% 64.4% 60.0% 50.0% ity Pairs ity CC 44.1% 40.0% Percentage of Percentage 31.0% 30.0% 19.1% 20.0% 16.8% 10. 0% 0.0% 0 1 or more 2 or more 3 or more 4 or more 5 or more Number of Entries Source: Database Products, HUB Data. Notes: [1] City pairs are non-directional. [2] To be considered an entrant the carrier's share must be greater than ten percent. [3] Top 1,000 city pairs ranked by total 2009 passengers. CONFIDENTIAL Exhibit 8 18 Entry, Exit, and Bankruptcy Filings, 1979-2009 16 Case3:10-cv-02858-RS Document75-2Filed08/24/10Page8of151 14 12 10 er of Carriers er of bb 8 Num 6 4 2 0 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Entry Ba nkruptcy Filings Exit Sources: Borenstein, Severin, and Nancy L. Rose, "How Airline Markets Work... Or Do They? Regulatory Reform in the Airline Industry", mimeo, October 2008 Figure 8; Jordan W.A.," Airline Entry Following U.S. Deregulation: The Definitive List of Startup Passenger Airlines, 1979-2003", 2005, pp. 8- 12, presented at the 2005 Annual meeting of Transportation Research Forum; Air Transport Association of America, U.S. Airline Bankruptcies & Service Cessations, <http://www.airlines.org/Economics/DataAnalysis/Pages/USAirlineBankruptciesServiceCessations.aspx>; Bureau of Transportation. Statistics, "Full-Time and Part-Time Airline Employment Data by Month": <http://www.bts.gov/airline_employment/src/index.xml.>. Note: Excludes cargo and charter carriers. CONFIDENTIAL Exhibit 9 Estimated Cost Savings Case3:10-cv-02858-RS Document75-2Filed08/24/10Page9of151 Synergy (in Millions) Continental Synergy (in Millions) United Corporate Overhead $284 Management Synergies $190 Spoke Stations $86 Information Technology $108 Technology $72 Station Overlap $148 Marketing/Reservations/Sales $66 Non-Airport Facilities $18 Maintenance $31 Procurement $151 Labor Dis-Synergy $272 Labor Dis-Synergy $277 Other Dis-Synergies $103 Total $338 Total $165 Sources: Continental Airlines, Inc., “Board of Directors Meeting,” April 28, 2010 4(c)(35), p. 25; UAL Corporation, “Board of Directors Meeting,” April 30, 2010, UALCORP01379 – 1516 at UALCORP01415. CONFIDENTIAL Exhibit 10 Improvements in Quality Case3:10-cv-02858-RS Document75-2Filed08/24/10Page10of151 Pre-Merger Post-Merger Percent Change Hours of Inconvenience 6.1 5.8 -4.0% Non-Stop Destinations 47.3 52.8 11.7% One-Stop Destinations 96.0 121.7 26.8% Sources: United PFM output; Continental time-of-week curves. Notes: [1] Based on marketing carrier. [2] Averages are weighted by pre-merger UA and CO passengers. CONFIDENTIAL Exhibit 11 Increases in Available Seat Miles (In Billions) Case3:10-cv-02858-RS Document75-2Filed08/24/10Page11of151 Pre-Merger Post-Merger Percent Change Domestic 144.0 145.6 1.05% International 114.1 114.1 0.04% Total 258.1 259.7 0.60% Source: United PFM output. Note: [1] ASM is calculated as seat capacity multiplied by flight distance. CONFIDENTIAL Exhibit 12 New Frequencies on Conduit Routes Case3:10-cv-02858-RS Document75-2Filed08/24/10Page12of151 Departure Directional Route Time DENIAH 15:15 IAHDEN 10:20 EWRSFO 14:27 SFOEWR 20:30 IADIAH 11:30 IAHIAD 12:55 IAHLAX 6:28 IAHLAX 22:55 LAXIAH 6:00 LAXIAH 23:30 IAHORD 16:25 ORDIAH 9:50 IAHSFO 12:53 SFOIAH 9:00 Source: UAL Corporation, "Coldplay - Growth Conduits Q Schedule," July 1, 2010. CONFIDENTIAL Exhibit 13 New Non-Stop Growth Routes Case3:10-cv-02858-RS Document75-2Filed08/24/10Page13of151 Domestic Growth Routes International Growth Routes Chicago, IL (ORD) to: Chicago, IL (ORD) to: Flint, MI (FNT) Mexico City, Mexico (MEX) Fort Walton Beach, FL (VPS) Monterrey, Mexico (MTY) Denver, CO (DEN) to: Los Angeles, CA (LAX) to: Amarillo, TX (AMA) Guadalajara, Mexico (GDL) Lubbock, TX (LBB) Mazatlan, Mexico (MZT) Mexico City, Mexico (MEX) Houston, TX (IAH) to: Monterrey, Mexico (MTY) Bakersfield, CA (BFL) San Jose, Costa Rica (SJO) Burbank, CA (BUR) San Salvador, El Salvador (SAL) Cedar Rapids, IA (CID) Fargo, ND (FAR) Washington, DC (IAD) to: Grand Junction, CO (GJT) Panama City, Panama (PTY) Palm Springs, CA (PSP) San Jose del Cabo, Mexico (SJD) Spokane, WA (GEG) San Salvador, El Salvador (SAL) Newark, NJ (EWR) to: Colorado Springs, CO (COS) Des Moines, IA (DSM) San Francisco, CA (SFO) to: New Orleans (MSY) Source: United PFM output. Note: [1] Four routes in the growth schedule (IAH-ASE, LAX-AUS, ORD-ERI, ORD-PTY) are excluded because they do not meet United's profitability threshold. CONFIDENTIAL Exhibit 14 Variables in United's PFM Variable Description Case3:10-cv-02858-RS Document75-2Filed08/24/10Page14of151 Level-of-service Dummy variable representing the level-of-service of the itinerary (nonstop, direct, single-connect, or double- connect) with respect to the best level-of-service available in the city-pair.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Overview and Trends
    9310-01 Chapter 1 10/12/99 14:48 Page 15 1 M Overview and Trends The Transportation Research Board (TRB) study committee that pro- duced Winds of Change held its final meeting in the spring of 1991. The committee had reviewed the general experience of the U.S. airline in- dustry during the more than a dozen years since legislation ended gov- ernment economic regulation of entry, pricing, and ticket distribution in the domestic market.1 The committee examined issues ranging from passenger fares and service in small communities to aviation safety and the federal government’s performance in accommodating the escalating demands on air traffic control. At the time, it was still being debated whether airline deregulation was favorable to consumers. Once viewed as contrary to the public interest,2 the vigorous airline competition 1 The Airline Deregulation Act of 1978 was preceded by market-oriented administra- tive reforms adopted by the Civil Aeronautics Board (CAB) beginning in 1975. 2 Congress adopted the public utility form of regulation for the airline industry when it created CAB, partly out of concern that the small scale of the industry and number of willing entrants would lead to excessive competition and capacity, ultimately having neg- ative effects on service and perhaps leading to monopolies and having adverse effects on consumers in the end (Levine 1965; Meyer et al. 1959). 15 9310-01 Chapter 1 10/12/99 14:48 Page 16 16 ENTRY AND COMPETITION IN THE U.S. AIRLINE INDUSTRY spurred by deregulation now is commonly credited with generating large and lasting public benefits.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C Informal Complaints to DOT by New Entrant Airlines About Unfair Exclusionary Practices March 1993 to May 1999
    9310-08 App C 10/12/99 13:40 Page 171 Appendix C Informal Complaints to DOT by New Entrant Airlines About Unfair Exclusionary Practices March 1993 to May 1999 UNFAIR PRICING AND CAPACITY RESPONSES 1. Date Raised: May 1999 Complaining Party: AccessAir Complained Against: Northwest Airlines Description: AccessAir, a new airline headquartered in Des Moines, Iowa, began service in the New York–LaGuardia and Los Angeles to Mo- line/Quad Cities/Peoria, Illinois, markets. Northwest offers connecting service in these markets. AccessAir alleged that Northwest was offering fares in these markets that were substantially below Northwest’s costs. 171 9310-08 App C 10/12/99 13:40 Page 172 172 ENTRY AND COMPETITION IN THE U.S. AIRLINE INDUSTRY 2. Date Raised: March 1999 Complaining Party: AccessAir Complained Against: Delta, Northwest, and TWA Description: AccessAir was a new entrant air carrier, headquartered in Des Moines, Iowa. In February 1999, AccessAir began service to New York–LaGuardia and Los Angeles from Des Moines, Iowa, and Moline/ Quad Cities/Peoria, Illinois. AccessAir offered direct service (nonstop or single-plane) between these points, while competitors generally offered connecting service. In the Des Moines/Moline–Los Angeles market, Ac- cessAir offered an introductory roundtrip fare of $198 during the first month of operation and then planned to raise the fare to $298 after March 5, 1999. AccessAir pointed out that its lowest fare of $298 was substantially below the major airlines’ normal 14- to 21-day advance pur- chase fares of $380 to $480 per roundtrip and was less than half of the major airlines’ normal 7-day advance purchase fare of $680.
    [Show full text]
  • Customers First Plan, Highlighting Definitions of Terms
    RepLayout for final pdf 8/28/2001 9:24 AM Page 1 2001 Annual Report [c u s t o m e r s] AIR TRANSPORT ASSOCIATION RepLayout for final pdf 8/28/2001 9:24 AM Page 2 Officers Carol B. Hallett President and CEO John M. Meenan Senior Vice President, Industry Policy Edward A. Merlis Senior Vice President, Legislative and International Affairs John R. Ryan Acting Senior Vice President, Aviation Safety and Operations Vice President, Air Traffic Management Robert P. Warren mi Thes Air Transports i Associationo n of America, Inc. serves its Senior Vice President, member airlines and their customers by: General Counsel and Secretary 2 • Assisting the airline industry in continuing to prov i d e James L. Casey the world’s safest system of transportation Vice President and • Transmitting technical expertise and operational Deputy General Counsel kn o w l e d g e among member airlines to improve safety, service and efficiency J. Donald Collier Vice President, • Advocating fair airline taxation and regulation world- Engineering, Maintenance and Materiel wide, ensuring a profitable and competitive industry Albert H. Prest Vice President, Operations Nestor N. Pylypec Vice President, Industry Services Michael D. Wascom Vice President, Communications Richard T. Brandenburg Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer David A. Swierenga Chief Economist RepLayout for final pdf 8/28/2001 9:24 AM Page 3 [ c u s t o m e r s ] Table of Contents Officers . .2 The member airlines of the Air Mission . .2 President’s Letter . .5 Transport Association are committed to Goals . .5 providing the highest level of customer Highlights .
    [Show full text]
  • Forward-Thinking Efficient Competitive
    EFFICIENT COMPETITIVE FORWARD-THINKING ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2013 ANNUAL REPORT 2013 HIGHLIGHTS ADM +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ FINANCIAL RETROSPECTIVE OPERATIONS (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) 2011-2013 2013 2012 2011 20101 2009 Passenger traffic Cargo volume (metric tons) Aircraft movements 2011 13,668,829 2011 189,318 2011 253,298 Revenues $ 446,584 $ 435,461 $ 426,968 $ 389,314 $ 350,968 2012 13,809,820 2012 185,028 2012 243,436 Excess (deficiency) 2013 14,095,272 2013 177,165 2013 234,638 of revenues over expenses 13,625 6,941 5,423 (9,040) (8,989) ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ EBITDA 197,835 189,603 183,978 2 163,974 2 151,466 Investments $ 177,353 $ 194,722 $ 113,685 $ 64,601 $ 186,414 REAL ESTATE AND COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT 1. The Corporation adopted International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as of its fiscal year beginning January 1, 2010. 2013 2011-2013 2. Excluding the write-down in 2008 (or gain in 2010 and 2011) on investments in floating rate notes (originally ABCP). New leases Investments generated Jobs created (In square metres) (In millions of dollars) Estimates
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of U.S. Commercial Domestic Aircraft Operations from 1991 to 2010
    THE EVOLUTION OF U.S. COMMERCIAL DOMESTIC AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS FROM 1991 TO 2010 by MASSACHUSETTS INSTME OF TECHNOLOGY ALEXANDER ANDREW WULZ UL02 1 B.S., Aerospace Engineering University of Notre Dame (2008) Submitted to the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics in PartialFulfillment of the Requirementsfor the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY June 2012 0 2012 Alexander Andrew Wulz. All rights reserved. .The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part in any medium now known or hereafter created. Signature of Author ..................................................................... .. ...................... Department of Aeronautr and Astronautics n n May 11, 2012 Certified by ............................................................................ Peter P. Belobaba Principle Research Scientist of Aeronautics and Astronautics / Thesis Supervisor A ccepted by ................................................................... Eytan H. Modiano Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics Chair, Graduate Program Committee 1 PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 THE EVOLUTION OF U.S. COMMERCIAL DOMESTIC AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS FROM 1991 TO 2010 by ALEXANDER ANDREW WULZ Submitted to the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics on May 11, 2012 in PartialFulfillment of the Requirementsfor the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN AERONAUTICS AND ASTRONAUTICS ABSTRACT The main objective of this thesis is to explore the evolution of U.S. commercial domestic aircraft operations from 1991 to 2010 and describe the implications for future U.S. commercial domestic fleets. Using data collected from the U.S. Bureau of Transportation Statistics, we analyze 110 different aircraft types from 145 airlines operating U.S. commercial domestic service between 1991 and 2010. We classify the aircraft analyzed into four categories: turboprop, regional jet, narrow-body, and wide-body.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 106 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 106 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 145 WASHINGTON, TUESDAY, OCTOBER 5, 1999 No. 133 Senate The Senate met at 9:30 a.m. and was SCHEDULE If Congress does not reauthorize the called to order by the President pro Mr. MCCAIN. Mr. President, today Airport Improvement Program (AIP), tempore [Mr. THURMOND]. the Senate will resume consideration the Federal Aviation Administration of the pending amendments to the FAA (FAA) will be prohibited from issuing PRAYER bill. Senators should be aware that much needed grants to airports in every state, regardless of whether or The Chaplain, Dr. Lloyd John rollcall votes are possible today prior not funds have been appropriated. We Ogilvie, offered the following prayer: to the 12:30 recess in an attempt to have now entered fiscal year 2000, and Lord of all life, our prayer is like complete action on the bill by the end we cannot put off reauthorization of breathing. We breathe in Your Spirit of the day. As a reminder, first-degree the AIP. The program lapsed as of last and breathe out praise to You. Help us amendments to the bill must be filed to take a deep breath of Your love, Friday. Every day that goes by without by 10 a.m. today. As a further re- an AIP authorization is another day peace, and joy so that we will be re- minder, debate on three judicial nomi- freshed and ready for the day.
    [Show full text]
  • January 2015
    THE SOURCE FOR AIRFREIGHT LOGISTICS International Edition • AirCargoWorld.com • Dec. 2014/Jan. 2015 OLIVER EVANS CHIEF CARGO OFFICER SWISS INTERNATIONAL AIR LINES AIR CARGO EXECUTIVE OF THE YEAR p.20 GAME CHANGERS: THREE TOP EXECS SHAPING THE INDUSTRY’S FUTURE p.24 Contents AIR CARGO EXECUTIVE OF THE YEAR Volume 17 • Number 11 • December 2014/January 2015 OLIVER EVANS A LEADER IN ANY LANGUAGE p.20 News Inside: 7 UpFront IATA’s five-year prediction, TNT hits the road and more 8 Asia Cargolux eyes new trans-Pacific venture 12 Africa & Middle East Cargo carriers continue service in hot zones GAME CHANGERS 14 Europe Three top airfreight executives shaping the industry’s future IAG Cargo launches EuroConnector service 17 Americas Could JFK’s freight move upstate? Departments 4 Publisher’s Note 10 Cargo Chat: Martin Drew 40 Bottom Line p.28 WORLD AIRFREIGHT DIRECTORY 42 Classifieds Our annual reference guide for airlines, airports, forwarders 44 People and other airfreight professionals from around the globe 45 Events / Advertiser’s Index 46 Forwarders’ Forum Air Cargo World (ISSN 1933-1614) is published monthly and owned by Royal Media. Air Cargo World is located at 1080 Holcomb Bridge Rd., Suite 255, Roswell, GA 30076. Production office is located at 2033 Sixth Avenue, Suite 830, Seattle WA 98121; telephone 206-587-6537. Air Cargo World is a registered trademark. Periodicals postage paid at Downers Grove, IL and at additional mailing offices. Subscription rates: 1 year, $80; 2 year $128; outside USA surface mail/1 year $120; 2 year $216. Single copies $20. Express Delivery Guide, Carrier Guide, Freight Forwarder Directory and Airport Directory single copies $14.95 domestic; $21.95 overseas.
    [Show full text]
  • EXPERT REPORT of MICHAEL E. LEVINE in Re
    EXPERT REPORT of MICHAEL E. LEVINE in re: Brady et. al. v. Air Line Pilots Association, et. al Civil Action No. 02-cv-02917-JEI (D.N.J.) 1 Table of Contents I. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 3 A. Qualifications ............................................................................................................... 3 B. Overview of Assignment ........................................................................................... 5 C. Summary of Opinions ................................................................................................ 5 D. Summary of Plaintiffs’ Expert Opinions ................................................................. 7 II. TWA Was Structurally Unsound and No Longer Viable as a Standalone Airline ................................................................................................................................. 9 A. Historical Overview of TWA’s Competitive Position ........................................ 10 B. TWA’s Inability To Survive with a Single Hub in St. Louis ............................... 12 C. The Impact of Southwest Airlines Competition at St. Louis ............................. 17 D. The American Acquisition Was TWA’s Only Alternative to Liquidation ....... 21 III. The Challenges to Seniority Integration at American Airlines .............................. 26 A. The Unique Importance of Labor Relations in the Airline Industry ................ 26 B. The Impact of
    [Show full text]
  • 2002 Annual Report
    Kellogg_air 6/18/02 12:00 PM Page 1 2002 ANNUAL REPORT FOR OSPACIOUS beautiful SKIES, Kellogg_air 6/18/02 12:00 PM Page 2 OFFICERS Carol B. Hallett President and CEO Malcolm B.“Mac” Armstrong Senior Vice President, TABLE OF CONTENTS Operations and Safety John M. Meenan Officers . .2 Senior Vice President, Industry Policy Mission . .2 Edward A. Merlis Goals . .4 Senior Vice President, President’s Letter . .5 Legislative and International Affairs Highlights . .6 Robert P. Warren Industry Review . .9 Senior Vice President, Traffic . .9 General Counsel and Secretary Capacity . .10 Fleet . .10 M. Bradley Ballance Revenues . .11 Vice President, E-Business Expenses . .12 James L. Casey Balance Sheet . .13 Vice President and Earnings . .13 Deputy General Counsel Taxes and Fees . .13 J. Donald Collier Environmental Progress . .14 Vice President, Facts and Figures . .15 Engineering, Maintenance Definitions of Terms . .24 and Materiel Index of Charts and Tables . .24 Member Airlines . .27 Albert H. Prest Vice President, Flight Operations CREDITS Pages 1-26: Excerpt from America the Beautiful (1913 version), by Katharine Lee Bates. Nestor N. Pylypec Page 3: Landscape photograph Under the Rainbow, copyright Larry Kanfer, Minneapolis. Vice President, Industry Services REPORT CONTENT John R. Ryan Unless otherwise noted, the data provided in this report reflects the activity of 100 U.S. scheduled airlines (Major, National and Regional passenger and cargo Vice President, Air Traffic Management airlines as defined by the U.S. Department of Transportation under Chapter 411 of Title 49 of the U.S. Code—see page 19 of this report). Michael D.Wascom In some cases numbers in this report may not total, due to rounding.
    [Show full text]
  • Change 3, FAA Order JO 7340.2B, Contractions
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION JO 7340.2B CHANGE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION CHG3 Air Traffic Organization Policy Effective Date: October 20, 2011 SUBJ: Contractions 1. Purpose of This Change. This change transmits revised pages to Federal Aviation Administration Order JO 7340.2B, Contractions. 2. Audience. This change applies to all Air Traffic Organization (ATO) personnel and anyone using ATO directives. 3. Where Can I Find This Change? This change is available on the FAA Web site at http://faa.gov/air_traffic/publications and https://employees.faa.gov/tools_resources/orders_notices/. 4. Distribution. This change is distributed to selected offices in Washington headquarters, regional offices, service area offices, the William J. Hughes Technical Center, and the Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center; to all field offices and field facilities; to all airway facilities field offices; to all international aviation field offices, airport district offices, and flight standards district offices; and to interested aviation public. 5. Disposition of Transmittal. Retain this transmittal until superseded by a new basic order. 6. Page Control Chart. See the page control chart attachment. <QLJ Tizabeth L. Ray Vice President, Mission Support Services Air Traffic Organization Date: 7""^ A// Distribution: ZAT-734, ZAT-464 Initiated By: AJV-0 Vice President, Mission Support Services 10/20/11 JO 7340.2B CHG 3 PAGE CONTROL CHART REMOVE PAGES DATED INSERT PAGES DATED CAM 1−1 through CAM 1−19 . 6/30/11 CAM 1−1 through CAM 1−16 . 10/20/11 TOC−i and TOC−ii . 11/18/10 TOC−i and TOC−ii . 10/20/11 2−1−11 . 11/18/10 2−1−11 .
    [Show full text]
  • November 1999
    Aviation Strategy Issue No: 25 November 1999 The unpredictable dynamics of alliance competition CONTENTS Analysis “ n the future airline competition will be competition between alliances" - Ithis vision of the evolution of the airline industry from Jurgen Weber Potential Star attack CEO of Lufthansa is now widely accepted. But its implication of rational on UK premium traffic 2 global competition between integrated networks is far from today's reality. Recent proxy battles between the alliances - see pages 2 and 3 - Canada: restructuring plan reveal the unpredictable dynamics of alliances and the tensions between lost in financial battle 3 the members. The concept of cross-equity links had been abandoned in forming the What does EADS mean mew global alliances (except where it was considered necessary to sup- for Airbus and the A3XX? 4-5 port a privatisation as with Thai next year). Now in the case of Air Canada, the senior members of Star find themselves having to invest funds to stave United: what’s the off a hostile bid from American and others. optimal growth rate? 5-6 Star is expanding well beyond its original plan of 10 members, with Austrian, ANA, SIA, Mexicana, BMA and a Chinese airline all in the Schiphol: what’s the process of joining. Oneworld is adding Iberia, Aer Lingus and Lan Chile in optimal level of pollution? 7-8 quick succession. As such it is very difficult to maintain any semblance of equality between the participants. Briefing This table summarises the recent profitability of the alliance members and gives a clear indication of their relative power.
    [Show full text]
  • Use CTL/F to Search for INACTIVE Airlines on This Page - Airlinehistory.Co.Uk
    The World's Airlines Use CTL/F to search for INACTIVE airlines on this page - airlinehistory.co.uk site search by freefind search Airline 1Time (1 Time) Dates Country A&A Holding 2004 - 2012 South_Africa A.T. & T (Aircraft Transport & Travel) 1981* - 1983 USA A.V. Roe 1919* - 1920 UK A/S Aero 1919 - 1920 UK A2B 1920 - 1920* Norway AAA Air Enterprises 2005 - 2006 UK AAC (African Air Carriers) 1979* - 1987 USA AAC (African Air Charter) 1983*- 1984 South_Africa AAI (Alaska Aeronautical Industries) 1976 - 1988 Zaire AAR Airlines 1954 - 1987 USA Aaron Airlines 1998* - 2005* Ukraine AAS (Atlantic Aviation Services) **** - **** Australia AB Airlines 2005* - 2006 Liberia ABA Air 1996 - 1999 UK AbaBeel Aviation 1996 - 2004 Czech_Republic Abaroa Airlines (Aerolineas Abaroa) 2004 - 2008 Sudan Abavia 1960^ - 1972 Bolivia Abbe Air Cargo 1996* - 2004 Georgia ABC Air Hungary 2001 - 2003 USA A-B-C Airlines 2005 - 2012 Hungary Aberdeen Airways 1965* - 1966 USA Aberdeen London Express 1989 - 1992 UK Aboriginal Air Services 1994 - 1995* UK Absaroka Airways 2000* - 2006 Australia ACA (Ancargo Air) 1994^ - 2012* USA AccessAir 2000 - 2000 Angola ACE (Aryan Cargo Express) 1999 - 2001 USA Ace Air Cargo Express 2010 - 2010 India Ace Air Cargo Express 1976 - 1982 USA ACE Freighters (Aviation Charter Enterprises) 1982 - 1989 USA ACE Scotland 1964 - 1966 UK ACE Transvalair (Air Charter Express & Air Executive) 1966 - 1966 UK ACEF Cargo 1984 - 1994 France ACES (Aerolineas Centrales de Colombia) 1998 - 2004* Portugal ACG (Air Cargo Germany) 1972 - 2003 Colombia ACI
    [Show full text]