Soil Survey of a Selected Study Area in Somaliland

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Soil Survey of a Selected Study Area in Somaliland Soil Survey of a Selected Study Area in Somaliland Soil = ƒ (Cl, O, R, P, Project Report No. L-05 Feb 2007 Somalia Water and Land Information Management Ngecha Road, Lake View. P.O Box 30470-00100, Nairobi, Kenya. Tel +254 020 4000300 - Fax +254 020 4000333, Email: [email protected] We bsite: http//www.faoswalim.org. Funded by the European Union and implemented by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. This document should be cited as follows: Vargas, R. R., Alim, M. 2007. Soil survey of a Selected Study Area in Somaliland. FA0- SWALIM. Project Report L-05. Nairobi, Kenya. Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Acronyms Acknowledgment 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................. 1 2 STUDY AREA ................................................................................................. 2 2.1 Location and delineation ........................................................................... 2 2.2 Climate .................................................................................................. 3 2.3 Geology/Lithology ................................................................................... 5 2.4 Landform and Soils .................................................................................. 6 2.5 Land cover ............................................................................................. 6 2.6 Land Use ................................................................................................ 6 2.7 Population .............................................................................................. 7 3 MATERIALS AND METHODS ............................................................................. 8 3.1 Materials ................................................................................................ 8 3.2 Methods ................................................................................................. 8 3.2.1 Bibliographic research and data collection ............................................ 8 3.2.2 The soil mapping model ..................................................................... 8 3.2.3 Landscape stratification (Geopedological approach) ............................. 11 3.2.4 Soil sampling design ....................................................................... 11 3.2.5 Soil field-survey ............................................................................. 13 3.2.6 Soil data input ................................................................................ 13 3.2.7 Soil Laboratory analysis ................................................................... 13 3.2.8 Soil classification ............................................................................ 14 3.2.9 Determination and acquisition of necessary environmental variables ...... 15 3.2.10 Development of a key to separate soil classes based on environmental variables 26 3.2.11 Characterisation of soil classes (decision tree) .................................... 26 3.2.12 Running the soil prediction model ..................................................... 28 3.2.13 Verification and validation of the soil maps ......................................... 28 4 RESULTS .................................................................................................... 29 4.1 Soil profiles .......................................................................................... 29 4.2 Soil map at 1:100 000 scale ................................................................... 29 4.2.1 Technical description of the soil classes .............................................. 30 4.2.2 General accuracy of the map ............................................................ 43 4.3 Soil map at 1:50 000 scale ..................................................................... 46 4.3.1 Technical description of the Suffix qualifiers used in the classification ..... 47 4.4 Technical assessment of the soil resource in the study area ......................... 50 5 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................................... 55 6 BIBLIOGRAPHY ............................................................................................ 56 ANNEXES .......................................................................................................... 58 Annex 1: Soil data collection form Annex 2: Soil analysis laboratory results Annex 3: Soil profile description Table of Contents List of Tables Table 1: Soil studies ................................................................................................................... 1 Table 2: Regions, districts, and their populations (Somalia UNDP 2005, draft version) .......... 7 Table 2: Materials ....................................................................................................................... 8 Table 4: Geodesic System ........................................................................................................ 15 Table 5: Environmental variables ............................................................................................. 15 Table 6: Landscape and relief type legend ............................................................................... 16 Table 7: Slope classes ............................................................................................................... 16 Table 8: Soil moisture and temperature regimes ...................................................................... 17 Table 9: Area of soil reference classes and key properties ....................................................... 29 Table 10: Soil laboratory results of the Vertisols ..................................................................... 33 Table 12: Prefix qualifiers ........................................................................................................ 43 Table 13: Error matrix using Expert Knowledge ..................................................................... 44 Table 14: Error matrix of the validation process ...................................................................... 45 Table 15: Extent of the soil classes .......................................................................................... 46 Table 16: Suffix qualifiers and its technical meaning ............................................................. 47 Table 17: Technical assessment of the soil resource ............................................................... 50 List of Figures Figure 1: Study area ............................................................................................. 2 Figure 2: Rainfall and potential evapotranspiration .................................................... 4 Figure 3: Relative humidity of the study area ........................................................... 4 Figure 4: Rainfall distribution and climate classification of the study area ..................... 5 Figure 5: Soil-environmental characterisation ......................................................... 26 Figure 6: Decision tree ........................................................................................ 27 List of Pictures Picture 1: Gully formation due to soil bunding ........................................................ 52 Picture 2: Soil stoniness ...................................................................................... 53 Picture 3: Available manure that is not used in the fields .......................................... 54 List of Maps Map 1: Soil transects locations ............................................................................. 12 Map 2: Landscape .............................................................................................. 18 Map 3: Relief ..................................................................................................... 20 Map 4: Land Cover ............................................................................................. 22 Map 5: Land Use ................................................................................................ 24 Map 6: Slope ..................................................................................................... 26 Map 7: Soil Moisture Regimes .............................................................................. 27 Map 8: Soil profiles location ................................................................................ 44 Map 9: Soil at Prefix Level ................................................................................... 45 Map 10: Soils at [Prefix and Suffix Level ................................................................ 51 Table of Contents List of acronyms AOI Area of Interest CMSV Continuous Model of Spatial Variation DEM Digital Elevation Model DSM Digital Soil Mapping DMSV Discrete Model of Spatial Variation FAO Food and Agriculture Organization GP Geopedological Approach GIS Geographical Information System ILWIS Integrated Land and Water Information System LCCS Land Cover Classification System NSM Newhall Simulation Model SIHLMA Somalia Integrated Hierarchical Landform Mapping Approach SoLIM Soil Land
Recommended publications
  • September 29, 2005 Parliamentary Election Assessment Report
    International Republican Institute Suite 700 1225 Eye St., NW Washington, D.C. 20005 (202) 408-9450 (202) 408-9462 FAX www.iri.org International Republican Institute Somaliland September 29, 2005 Parliamentary Election Assessment Report Table of Contents Map of Somaliland……………………………………………………………………..….2 Executive Summary…………………………………………………………………….....3 I. Background Information.............................................................................................…..5 II. Legal and Administrative Framework………………………………..………..……….8 III. Pre-Election Period……………. …...……………………………..…………...........12 IV. Election Day…………...…………………………………………………………….18 V. Post-Election Period and Results.…………………………………………………….27 VI. Findings and Recommendations……………………………………………………..33 VII. Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………..38 Appendix A: Voting Results in 2005 Presidential Elections…………………………….39 Appendix B: Voting Results in 2003 Presidential Elections…………………………….41 Appendix C: Voting Results in 2002 Local Government Elections……………………..43 Appendix D: Voting Trends……………………………………………………………..44 IRI – Somaliland September 29, 2005 Parliamentary Election Assessment Report 1 Map of Somaliland IRI – Somaliland September 29, 2005 Parliamentary Election Assessment Report 2 Executive Summary Background The International Republican Institute (IRI) has conducted programs in Somaliland since 2002 with the support of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), the U.S. Department of State, and the National Endowment for Democracy (NED). IRI’s Somaliland
    [Show full text]
  • Land Use Planning Guidelines for Somaliland 2009
    Land Use Planning Guidelines for Somaliland Project Report No L-13 March 2009 Somalia Water and Land Information Management Ngecha Road, Lake View. P.O Box 30470-00100, Nairobi, Kenya. Tel +254 020 4000300 - Fax +254 020 4000333, Email: [email protected] Website: http//www.faoswalim.org. Funded by the European Union and implemented by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and the SWALIM Project concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. This document should be cited as follows: Venema, J.H., Alim, M., Vargas, R.R., Oduori, S and Ismail, A. 2009. Land use planning guidelines for Somaliland. Technical Project Report L-13. FAO-SWALIM, Nairobi, Kenya. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Acronyms ............................................................................................ v Acknowledgments ..........................................................................................vi ABOUT THE GUIDELINES................................................................................ vii 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................... 1 1.1 What is land use planning?................................................................. 1 1.2 Recent
    [Show full text]
  • SOMALIA RAINFALL and FLOODS UPDATE 02 May 2021
    SOMALIA RAINFALL and FLOODS UPDATE 02 May 2021 Due to climate change and its associated impacts Somalia is now recording more wet and dry weather events, often with disastrous consequences for the people facing such extremes. It has become even more difficult to predict such sequential events. Currently, more than 80 percent of the country is facing drought conditions in the mid of the primary Gu rainy season. Yet, flash floods have been reported in the last two days following heavy and sporadic rains in Somaliland. In addition, limited climate change adaptive capacities has led to irresponsible socio- economic practices like cutting of river banks to extract irrigation waters, further exposing the communities to climate hazards. For instance, riverine flooding due to open river banks near Baarey and Moyko villages has been reported in Jowhar within Middle Shabelle region. With current climate models predicting extreme temperatures and rainfall in the future within the region, the country is likely to continue experiencing frequent flood and drought events with likely consequences of affecting untold numbers of people, taxing economies, disrupting food production, creating unrest and prompting migrations. FLOODS AND RAINS UPDATE The Gu rains continued to spread across most parts of the country with Somaliland and Puntland experiencing moderate to heavy rains over the last week. Other areas in central and southern regions recorded light to moderate rains. The Ethiopian highlands received moderate rains within the last week. Since 25 May 2021, most parts of Somaliland have been receiving moderate to heavy rains. Localized flash floods caused by the heavy rainfall were reported on 01 May 2021 in parts of Hargeisa district.
    [Show full text]
  • Somaliland Assistance Bulletin
    Somaliland Assistance Bulletin 1 – 30 November 2005 HUMANITARIAN SITUATION Security & Access The overall security situation in Somaliland remained stable. A verdict was issued on the trail case of the 10 arrested suspects of the killings of four humanitarian workers occurring in 2003 and 2004. The case originally started in March 2005. According to the regional court in Hargeisa, 8 men were found guilty of "terrorism" and were sentenced to death. Following the killing of the 4 expatriate humanitarian workers, the UN in collaboration with the national authorities established a Special Protection Unit (SPU) initially to provide protection for humanitarian workers of UN & international NGOs, subsequently extended to the rest of the community. Since then no further incidents were reported. A deadly mine accident occurred in Burao on 16 November 2005 where a vehicle diverted from the main road towards a roadside short cut. Three out of a total of seven passengers were reported dead, including one UN staff member. Somaliland Mine Action Center (SMAC), supported by UNDP, coordinates mine action activities, since late 1999, an approximate area of around 115 million square meters has been cleared. Food Security/Livelihoods Aerial Photograph of Burao settlements, source UN Habitat. Deyr rain started on time, whereby most areas received Ministry of Health & Labour (MOH&L), the Somali Red normal to above normal rains except for parts of Crescent Society, Save the Children Fund, Candlelight southern Awdal region. Rainfall distribution and intensity and Havoyoco. Sources of income among Burao were good and allowed for further replenishment of water settlements were labeled more irregular and unreliable.
    [Show full text]
  • Afmadow District Detailed Site Assessment Lower Juba Region, Somalia
    Afmadow district Detailed Site Assessment Lower Juba Region, Somalia Introduction Location map The Detailed Site Assessment (DSA) was triggered in the perspectives of different groups were captured2. KI coordination with the Camp Coordination and Camp responses were aggregated for each site. These were then Management (CCCM) Cluster in order to provide the aggregated further to the district level, with each site having humanitarian community with up-to-date information on an equal weight. Data analysis was done by thematic location of internally displaced person (IDP) sites, the sectors, that is, protection, water, sanitation and hygiene conditions and capacity of the sites and the humanitarian (WASH), shelter, displacement, food security, health and needs of the residents. The first round of the DSA took nutrition, education and communication. place from October 2017 to March 2018 assessing a total of 1,843 sites in 48 districts. The second round of the DSA This factsheet presents a summary of profiles of assessed sites3 in Afmadow District along with needs and priorities of took place from 1 September 2018 to 31 January 2019 IDPs residing in these sites. As the data is captured through assessing a total of 1778 sites in 57 districts. KIs, findings should be considered indicative rather than A grid pattern approach1 was used to identify all IDP generalisable. sites in a specific area. In each identified site, two key Number of assessed sites: 14 informants (KIs) were interviewed: the site manager or community leader and a women’s representative, to ensure Assessed IDP sites in Afmadow4 Coordinates: Lat. 0.6, Long.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 by Bram Piot
    Birding in and around Hargeisa, Somaliland, December 2010 by Bram Piot From December 10 to 17 I stayed in Hargeisa for my work with PSI, a public health NGO that recently established an office in Somaliland. For Saturday 11th I had organised a day out birding with Abdi Jama from NatureSomaliland, who had also guided three groups earlier this year – the first commercial birding tours to visit Somaliland. Our day trip took us east of Hargeisa through thorn bush, acacia woodland, rocky plains and wadis all the way to the vast Tuuyo plain (see map 1). Several very productive stops were made along the first 20 kilometers of the trip; Tuuyo plain was explored in the early afternoon so the birds there was not very active – e.g. none of the larks were singing, but this may also be because it is non-breeding season for most species. Our late lunch stop to the north of Shaarub village proved to be a good spot, but a long drive back to Hargeisa prevented us from fully exploring this area or the plains that we crossed further to the north (Qoryale for example looked pretty good). On hindsight, it probably would have been more efficient (less driving, more birding!) to drive back the way we came, rather than doing the long loop towards the Hargeisa-Berbera tarmac road. Total trip distance was about 280 km. Nearly 100 species were recorded during this day trip, with personal highlights including 3 species of Bustard (Little Brown, Heuglin’s, Buff-crested), several confiding Somali and Double- banded Coursers, a Greyish Eagle-Owl, 6 lark species including the endemic Lesser Hoopoe and Sharpe’s Larks, an Arabian Warbler, several Golden-breasted Starlings, a Three-streaked Tchagra, Rosy-patched Bush-shrikes, Somali Wheatears, Somali Bee-eaters, a group of Scaly Chatterers, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Enhanced Enrolment of Pastoralists in the Implementation and Evaluation of the UNICEF-FAO-WFP Resilience Strategy in Somalia
    Enhanced enrolment of pastoralists in the implementation and evaluation of the UNICEF-FAO-WFP Resilience Strategy in Somalia Prepared for UNICEF Eastern and Southern Africa Regional Office (ESARO) by Esther Schelling, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute UNICEF ESARO JUNE 2013 Enhanced enrolment of pastoralists in the implementation and evaluation of UNICEF-FAO-WFP Resilience Strategy in Somalia © United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), Nairobi, 2013 UNICEF Eastern and Southern Africa Regional Office (ESARO) PO Box 44145-00100 GPO Nairobi June 2013 The report was prepared for UNICEF Eastern and Southern Africa Regional Office (ESARO) by Esther Schelling, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute. The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the policies or the views of UNICEF. The text has not been edited to official publication standards and UNICEF accepts no responsibility for errors. The designations in this publication do not imply an opinion on legal status of any country or territory, or of its authorities, or the delimitation of frontiers. For further information, please contact: Esther Schelling, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, University of Basel: [email protected] Eugenie Reidy, UNICEF ESARO: [email protected] Dorothee Klaus, UNICEF ESARO: [email protected] Cover photograph © UNICEF/NYHQ2009-2301/Kate Holt 2 Table of Contents Foreword ...........................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Puntland and Somaliland: the Land Legal Framework
    Shelter Branch Land and Tenure Section Florian Bruyas Somaliland Puntland State of Somalia The Land Legal Framework Situation Analysis United Nations Human Settlement Programme November 2006 Map of Somalia 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements Scope and methodology of the study Chapter 1: Introduction Somalia, Somaliland and Puntland 1.1 Background 1.2 Recent history of Somalia 1.3 Clans 1.4 Somaliland 1.5 Puntland 1.6 Land through History 1.6.1 Under colonial rules 1.6.2 After independence Chapter 2: Identification of needs and problems related to land 2.1 Land conflict 2.2 IDPs and refugees 2.2.1 Land tenure option for IDPs 2.3 Limited capacity 2.3.1 Human resources 2.3.2 Capital city syndrome Chapter 3: The current framework for land administration 3.1 Existing land administration 3.1.1 In Somaliland 3.1.2 In Puntland 3.2 Existing judicial system 3.2.1 In Somaliland 3.2.2 In Puntland 3.3 Land and Tenure 3.2.1 Access to land in both regions 3 Chapter 4: A new legal framework for land administration 4.1 In Somaliland 4.1.1 Laws 4.1.2 Organizations 4.2 In Puntland 4.2.1 Law 4.2.2 Organizations 4.3 Land conflict resolution Chapter 5: Analysis of the registration system in both regions 5.2 Degree of security 5.3 Degree of sophistication 5.4 Cost of registering transactions 5.5 Time required for registering transactions 5.6 Access to the system Chapter 6: Minimum requirements for implementing land administration in other parts of the country Chapter 7: Gender perspective Chapter 8: Land and HIV/AIDS References Annexes --------------------------------------- 4 Acknowledgement I appreciate the assistance of Sandrine Iochem and Tom Osanjo who edited the final draft.
    [Show full text]
  • Coverage Survey Report of World Vision Nutrition Programs in Lughaya and Gabiley Districts in Somaliland
    COVERAGE SURVEY REPORT OF WORLD VISION NUTRITION PROGRAMS IN LUGHAYA AND GABILEY DISTRICTS IN SOMALILAND October – December 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ii Acronyms iii Executive summary vi 1.0 Introduction 1 1.1 Lughaya and Gabiley nutrition programs 2 2.0 Specific objectives of the survey 3 3.0 Investigation process 3 4.0 Findings 5 4.1 Stage 1: Routine program and qualitative data analysis 5 4.2 Stage 2: Hypothesis testing 14 4.3 Stage 3: Estimation of overall coverage 16 4.4 Discussion 27 4.5 Recommendations 35 Annexes 37 List of figures Figure 1: OTP admissions per site 5 Figure 2: OTP week of defaulting 5 Figure 3: OTP defaulters per site 6 Figure 4: OTP MUAC at defaulting 6 Figure 5: Program monitoring indicators – OTP 7 Figure 6: TSFP program admissions 7 Figure 7: TSFP MUAC at admission 8 Figure 8: Program monitoring indicators – TSFP 9 Figure 9: Program response to context 10 Figure 10: Lughaya MCHN program admissions 11 Figure 11: Gabiley MCHN admissions 11 Figure 12: Lughaya No. of deliveries per site 12 Figure 13: Gabiley No of deliveries per MCH 12 Figure 14: Reasons for coverage failure – small area surveys (TSFP) 21 Figure 15: Histogram of beliefs – OTP 18 Figure 16: Histogram of beliefs – TSFP 18 Figure 17: Prior estimate BayesSQUEAC OTP 19 Figure 18: Prior estimate BayesSQUEAC – TSFP 19 Figure 19: Reasons for coverage failure - TSFP 21 Figure 20: Point coverage BayesSQUEAC – OTP 22 Figure 21: Single coverage BayesSQUEAC – OTP 22 Figure 22: Point coverage BayesSQUEAC – TSFP 23 Figure 23: Single coverage BayesSQUEAC – TSFP 23 Figure 24: Reasons for PLW coverage failure (Lughaya) 24 Figure 25: Reasons for PLW coverage failure (Gabiley) 24 Figure 26: Reasons for 6-23months coverage failure (Lughaya) 25 Figure 27: Reasons for 6-23months coverage failure (Gabiley) 25 Figure 28: Health seeking for ANC (Lughaya) 26 Figure 29: Health seeking for ANC (Gabiley) 26 Coverage survey report of the WV Lughaya and Gabiley nutrition programs, October – December 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Protection Cluster Update Weekly Report
    Protection Cluster Update Funded by: The People of Japan Weeklyhttp://www.shabelle.net/article.php?id=4297 Report 23 th September 2011 European Commission IASC Somalia •Objective Protection Monitoring Network (PMN) Humanitarian Aid This update provides information on the protection environment in Somalia, including apparent violations of Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law as reported during the last two weeks through the IASC Somalia Protection Cluster monitoring systems. Incidents mentioned in this report are not exhaustive. They are intended to highlight credible reports in order to inform and prompt programming and advocacy initiatives by the humanitarian community and national authorities. General Overview Heavy fighting in southern regions between Al Shabaab and Transitional Federal Government (TFG) has led to heightened protection concerns throughout the reporting period. In Ceel Waaq, 43 people were killed and almost 80 wounded and an unknown number displaced following fighting between the TFG and Al Shabaab forces.1 The civilian population continues to face insecurity due to the ongoing conflict compounded by limited access to basic services and humanitarian support. In other regions, the famine has continued to take its toll on the Somali population. This week the United Nations Children Fund (UNICEF) stated that Somalia has the worst international mortality rate for children. 2 Furthermore, local sources in the district of Eldher town, Galgaduud region reported that 30 people had died as a result of starvation and
    [Show full text]
  • Guban Pastoral Livelihood Baseline Report
    Guban Pastoral Livelihood Baseline Report Technical Series Report No VI. 67 May 20, 2016 FSNAU Food Security and Nutrition Analysis Unit - Somalia Information for Better Livelihood Technical Partners FSNAU Funding Agencies Guban Pastoral Baseline Report Issued May 20, 2016 Executive Summary ii Guban Pastoral Baseline Report Issued May 20, 2016 Acknowledgements iii Acknowledgements The Food Security and Nutrition Analysis Unit (FSNAU) would like to acknowledge the special contributions from Somaliland Government staff (FSNAU focal points) for the administrative, technical and logistical support they provided in conducting the baseline Assessment. The process of conducting Guban baseline assessment and this report would not have been possible without the commitment of FSNAU Livelihoods baseline Team (Ahmed Mohamed Mohamoud, Baseline and Livelihood Lead Analyst), and Ahmed Jibril Tawakal, Assistant Livelihood Analyst, the commendable inputs of Abdi Hussein Roble, FSNAU Food security Deputy Technical Manager and the actual baseline data collection carried out by FSNAU Food Security Field Analysts (Abdirahman Yusuf, Abdishakur Mohamed Ali and Mahdi Gedi Gayad) and the Somaliland Government) for their assistance in conducting fieldwork, data analysis and validation and comments in delivery of quality outputs. Utmost appreciation also goes to FSNAU Technical Support Team for the time and effort spent in preparing this report. Special thanks to Alex Koton, FSNAU GIS Specialist. The authors acknowledge the nutrition information provided by the Senior Nutrition Analyst, Abukar Yusuf and the lay out of the report done by the Publications team, Catherine Kimani; Graphics Assistant, and Barasa Sindani; Publications Officer. Finally, special thanks to FSNAU Chief Technical Advisor, Daniel Molla and Peter Muhangi, Food Security and Livelihoods Analyst for their technical and methodological review of the report.
    [Show full text]
  • DROUGHT, DISPLACEMENT and LIVELIHOODS in SOMALIA/SOMALILAND Time for Gender-Sensitive and Protection-Focused Approaches
    DROUGHT, DISPLACEMENT AND LIVELIHOODS IN SOMALIA/SOMALILAND Time for gender-sensitive and protection-focused approaches JOINT AGENCY BRIEFING NOTE – JUNE 2018 ‘The drought destroyed our house, and by that I mean we lost all we had.’ Farhia,1 Daynile district, Banadir region Thousands of Somali families were displaced to urban centres by the 2017 drought. Research by a consortium of non-government organizations indicates that they do not intend to return home anytime soon. It also shows how precarious and limited are the livelihood opportunities for displaced people in Somalia; how far people’s options are affected by gender; and how changing gender dynamics present further protection threats to both men and women. Comparing the findings for Somaliland with those for the rest of the country, the research underscores the importance of local dynamics for people’s opportunities and protection. Gaps were highlighted in the provision of basic services for women particularly. Local, state and federal authorities, donors, and humanitarian and development actors need to improve displaced people’s immediate access to safe, gender-sensitive basic services – and to develop plans for more durable solutions to displacement. As floods in April to June 2018 have forced more people to leave their homes, an immediate step up in the response is essential. © Oxfam International June 2018 This paper was written by Emma Fanning. Oxfam acknowledges the assistance of Anna Tomson, Eric Kramak from REACH, Anna Coryndon, Francisco Yermo from Oxfam as well as colleagues in Oxfam, Plan International, World Vision, Danish Refugee Council and Regional Durable Solutions Secretariat (ReDSS) in its production.
    [Show full text]