DOCSLIB.ORG

Open Source Practice of LG Electronics

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Open Source Practice of LG Electronics Open Source Practice of LG Electronics Hyo Jun Im Software Platform Laboratory, LG Electronics Introduction to LG Electronics LG Electronics is a global leader and technology innovator in consumer electronics, mobile communications and home appliances. Overview This presentation covers both the open source compliance and open source engagement Compliance LG Community Engagement Open Source Compliance How LG Electronics built the open source compliance process from scratch. Steps for Building Up Open Source Compliance Process | Kick-starting open source compliance | Raising awareness | Setting up the process | Filling holes in the process | Efficient open source compliance Kick-starting Open Source Compliance | Challenges > Lack of knowledge on open source compliance > Lack of verification tools | What we did > Just rushed into writing the open source software notice in the user manual > Manual open source identification and verification | What we got > Basic knowledge of popular open source licenses > Need for automated verification tools > Knowledge on practical issues with open source compliance Raising Awareness | Introduction to relevant lawsuit case | Online / Offline training | Escalation of the open source compliance issues to management | Help from outside experts Industry Lawsuit Case • 2006 Set the precedent that the sale of a product can be prohibited 2007 • Distributors can be held responsible, and lawsuits filed against them • 2008 Similar to the case with Skype • 2010 Forced to give TVs to charity organizations as well as pay a penalty Online Training Setting up the Process | Verification Tool | Getting the open source compliance process into the product development process | Engagement from the legal department | Corporate-wide standard rules and processes | Monitoring | Training of the people involved in open source compliance Internal Workshop Monthly Newsletters and Documents Internal Information Site Filling Holes in the Process rd | 3 party software | OEM / ODM products | Conflict with the business | Non-Linux products | Organizations left out of the process Need one focal point in charge of open source compliance Efficient Open Source Compliance | Distribution Site | Verification Automation | Accumulating knowledge and claims Open Source Distribution Site http:/ / opensource.lge.com - Statistics concerning open source distribution - which categories or products are downloaded the most Open Source Compliance Process in General | Linux Foundation’s recommended compliance process A Glimpse Into Recommended Practices in a FOSS Compliance Management Process Ibrahim Haddad, The Linux Foundation LGE’s Open Source Compliance Process | Outline commonly used corporate process | Business units optimize the process to fit their specific needs Recent Issues | Ambiguous licenses | Errors in the original open source software | Non-Linux products Direct communication with customers and community is important Just answer the phone! (quote by Professor Eben Moglen) Open Source Engagement How LG Electronics is engaged in open source development. Steps for Open Source Engagement | Encouraging engineers | Getting consensus from management | Dealing with fragmentation Encouraging Engineers | Motivating engineers > Engineers can learn a lot from kernel experts worldwide > Individuals (not companies) are appreciated from the community > Less burden on maintaining | Rewarding contributors > Acknowledge by the boss or organization > Open Source Newbie Award Getting Consensus from Management | Highlight the short-term and practical benefits | Appealing corporate-wide benefits from open source engagement > Capability building for essential open source software > Low maintenance cost > Catching up with the latest version of the open source > Reviews by gurus improve software quality | Persuading management > Talk with the specific numbers and cases > Getting help from outside experts Dealing with the Fragmentation | Causes of fragmentation > Different source of original open source > Fragmentation by individual developers > Fragmentation by different organizations | Dealing with fragmentation > No magic bullet > Active information sharing among developers > Maintaining list of patches rather than whole tree > Internal open source repository > Upstreaming Android Case kernel.org Kernel / BSP Base model OS vendor Derived models Chipset vendors LTSI is the initiative to reduce fragmentation Open Source Repository | Internal open source repository > Internal source tree for open source software > Patches made by each product team are merged into the repository > Staging area for candidate patches to be submitted to community Open Repository source Open Open Open source source source Product A Product B Product C Case Study: SCSI Subsystem | Problem description > Kernel panic on sudden detach of USB storage device in TV > Caused by the race condition in SCSI subsystem | Working with the community > Developed a simple patch and applied to the product > Submitted the patch to LKML > Bart Van Assche further developed the patch (with 9 patches) > Zhuang, Jin Can of Intel fixed a potential problem with the patch | Getting benefits from community > Later on, we found another kernel panic on sudden detach of USB device > By applying the community patch, we fixed the problem!! LG’s Kernel Contributions | LG Electronics is actively contributing to Linux kernel since 2012 > Some full-time Linux contributors | Contributions are focused on the core kernel > mm: vrange, per-process reclaim, slub, zram improvements, … > perf: perf trace, event group view, ftrace integration, … Kernel version 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 28 52 47 98 46 Contributions (0.2%) (0.4%) (0.4%) (0.8%) (0.3%) Core kernel 27 48 41 97 42 contributions * (1.7%) (3.0%) (3.4%) (5.3%) (2.7%) * core kernel: kernel mm tools fs Issues with Linux Contribution | Time difference | Language barrier | Time-to-market | Alignment with business | Explaining embedded-specific issues to the community Thank You! | Thank you, kernel community > for making such a great OS and enabling us to make innovative products > for reviewing patches and giving us valuable feedback > for steadily maintaining kernel with high quality | Thank you, Linux Foundation > for your effort to protect and grow Linux > for holding various events for kernel developers > for giving us insight on the value of open source .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Measuring Software Performance on Linux Technical Report
    Measuring Software Performance on Linux Technical Report November 21, 2018 Martin Becker Samarjit Chakraborty Chair of Real-Time Computer Systems Chair of Real-Time Computer Systems Technical University of Munich Technical University of Munich Munich, Germany Munich, Germany [email protected] [email protected] OS program program CPU .text .bss + + .data +/- + instructions cache branch + coherency scheduler misprediction core + pollution + migrations data + + interrupt L1i$ miss access + + + + + + context mode + + (TLB flush) TLB + switch data switch miss L1d$ +/- + (KPTI TLB flush) miss prefetch +/- + + + higher-level readahead + page cache miss walk + + multicore + + (TLB shootdown) TLB coherency page DRAM + page fault + cache miss + + + disk + major minor I/O Figure 1. Event interaction map for a program running on an Intel Core processor on Linux. Each event itself may cause processor cycles, and inhibit (−), enable (+), or modulate (⊗) others. Abstract that our measurement setup has a large impact on the results. Measuring and analyzing the performance of software has More surprisingly, however, they also suggest that the setup reached a high complexity, caused by more advanced pro- can be negligible for certain analysis methods. Furthermore, cessor designs and the intricate interaction between user we found that our setup maintains significantly better per- formance under background load conditions, which means arXiv:1811.01412v2 [cs.PF] 20 Nov 2018 programs, the operating system, and the processor’s microar- chitecture. In this report, we summarize our experience on it can be used to improve high-performance applications. how performance characteristics of software should be mea- CCS Concepts • Software and its engineering → Soft- sured when running on a Linux operating system and a ware performance; modern processor.
    [Show full text]
  • Linux Kernel and Driver Development Training Slides
    Linux Kernel and Driver Development Training Linux Kernel and Driver Development Training © Copyright 2004-2021, Bootlin. Creative Commons BY-SA 3.0 license. Latest update: October 9, 2021. Document updates and sources: https://bootlin.com/doc/training/linux-kernel Corrections, suggestions, contributions and translations are welcome! embedded Linux and kernel engineering Send them to [email protected] - Kernel, drivers and embedded Linux - Development, consulting, training and support - https://bootlin.com 1/470 Rights to copy © Copyright 2004-2021, Bootlin License: Creative Commons Attribution - Share Alike 3.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/legalcode You are free: I to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work I to make derivative works I to make commercial use of the work Under the following conditions: I Attribution. You must give the original author credit. I Share Alike. If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under a license identical to this one. I For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work. I Any of these conditions can be waived if you get permission from the copyright holder. Your fair use and other rights are in no way affected by the above. Document sources: https://github.com/bootlin/training-materials/ - Kernel, drivers and embedded Linux - Development, consulting, training and support - https://bootlin.com 2/470 Hyperlinks in the document There are many hyperlinks in the document I Regular hyperlinks: https://kernel.org/ I Kernel documentation links: dev-tools/kasan I Links to kernel source files and directories: drivers/input/ include/linux/fb.h I Links to the declarations, definitions and instances of kernel symbols (functions, types, data, structures): platform_get_irq() GFP_KERNEL struct file_operations - Kernel, drivers and embedded Linux - Development, consulting, training and support - https://bootlin.com 3/470 Company at a glance I Engineering company created in 2004, named ”Free Electrons” until Feb.
    [Show full text]
  • An Evolutionary Study of Linux Memory Management for Fun and Profit Jian Huang, Moinuddin K
    An Evolutionary Study of Linux Memory Management for Fun and Profit Jian Huang, Moinuddin K. Qureshi, and Karsten Schwan, Georgia Institute of Technology https://www.usenix.org/conference/atc16/technical-sessions/presentation/huang This paper is included in the Proceedings of the 2016 USENIX Annual Technical Conference (USENIX ATC ’16). June 22–24, 2016 • Denver, CO, USA 978-1-931971-30-0 Open access to the Proceedings of the 2016 USENIX Annual Technical Conference (USENIX ATC ’16) is sponsored by USENIX. An Evolutionary Study of inu emory anagement for Fun and rofit Jian Huang, Moinuddin K. ureshi, Karsten Schwan Georgia Institute of Technology Astract the patches committed over the last five years from 2009 to 2015. The study covers 4587 patches across Linux We present a comprehensive and uantitative study on versions from 2.6.32.1 to 4.0-rc4. We manually label the development of the Linux memory manager. The each patch after carefully checking the patch, its descrip- study examines 4587 committed patches over the last tions, and follow-up discussions posted by developers. five years (2009-2015) since Linux version 2.6.32. In- To further understand patch distribution over memory se- sights derived from this study concern the development mantics, we build a tool called MChecker to identify the process of the virtual memory system, including its patch changes to the key functions in mm. MChecker matches distribution and patterns, and techniues for memory op- the patches with the source code to track the hot func- timizations and semantics. Specifically, we find that tions that have been updated intensively.
    [Show full text]
  • Review Der Linux Kernel Sourcen Von 4.9 Auf 4.10
    Review der Linux Kernel Sourcen von 4.9 auf 4.10 Reviewed by: Tested by: stecan stecan Period of Review: Period of Test: From: Thursday, 11 January 2018 07:26:18 o'clock +01: From: Thursday, 11 January 2018 07:26:18 o'clock +01: To: Thursday, 11 January 2018 07:44:27 o'clock +01: To: Thursday, 11 January 2018 07:44:27 o'clock +01: Report automatically generated with: LxrDifferenceTable, V0.9.2.548 Provided by: Certified by: Approved by: Account: stecan Name / Department: Date: Friday, 4 May 2018 13:43:07 o'clock CEST Signature: Review_4.10_0_to_1000.pdf Page 1 of 793 May 04, 2018 Review der Linux Kernel Sourcen von 4.9 auf 4.10 Line Link NR. Descriptions 1 .mailmap#0140 Repo: 9ebf73b275f0 Stephen Tue Jan 10 16:57:57 2017 -0800 Description: mailmap: add codeaurora.org names for nameless email commits ----------- Some codeaurora.org emails have crept in but the names don't exist for them. Add the names for the emails so git can match everyone up. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] 2 .mailmap#0154 3 .mailmap#0160 4 CREDITS#2481 Repo: 0c59d28121b9 Arnaldo Mon Feb 13 14:15:44 2017 -0300 Description: MAINTAINERS: Remove old e-mail address ----------- The ghostprotocols.net domain is not working, remove it from CREDITS and MAINTAINERS, and change the status to "Odd fixes", and since I haven't been maintaining those, remove my address from there. CREDITS: Remove outdated address information ----------- This address hasn't been accurate for several years now.
    [Show full text]
  • OMV Crash 25Feb2020 Syslog
    Feb 25 00:00:00 prometheus rsyslogd: [origin software="rsyslogd" swVersion="8.1901.0" x-pid="858" x-info="https://www.rsyslog.com"] rsyslogd was HUPed Feb 25 00:00:00 prometheus systemd[1]: logrotate.service: Succeeded. Feb 25 00:00:00 prometheus systemd[1]: Started Rotate log files. Feb 25 00:00:01 prometheus CRON[10420]: (root) CMD (/usr/sbin/omv- mkrrdgraph >/dev/null 2>&1) Feb 25 00:09:00 prometheus systemd[1]: Starting Clean php session files... Feb 25 00:09:00 prometheus sessionclean[10668]: PHP Warning: PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library '/usr/lib/php/20151012/pam.so' - /usr/lib/php/20151012/pam.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory in Unknown on line 0 Feb 25 00:09:00 prometheus sessionclean[10668]: PHP Warning: PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library '/usr/lib/php/20151012/pam.so' - /usr/lib/php/20151012/pam.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory in Unknown on line 0 Feb 25 00:09:00 prometheus sessionclean[10668]: PHP Warning: PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library '/usr/lib/php/20151012/pam.so' - /usr/lib/php/20151012/pam.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory in Unknown on line 0 Feb 25 00:09:00 prometheus systemd[1]: phpsessionclean.service: Succeeded. Feb 25 00:09:00 prometheus systemd[1]: Started Clean php session files. Feb 25 00:09:01 prometheus CRON[10770]: (root) CMD ( [ -x /usr/lib/ php/sessionclean ] && if [ ! -d /run/systemd/system ]; then /usr/lib/ php/sessionclean; fi) Feb 25 00:15:01 prometheus CRON[10858]: (root) CMD (/usr/sbin/omv- mkrrdgraph >/dev/null 2>&1) Feb 25 00:17:01 prometheus CRON[10990]: (root) CMD ( cd / && run- parts --report /etc/cron.hourly) Feb 25 00:17:01 prometheus postfix/postsuper[10993]: fatal: scan_dir_push: open directory hold: No such file or directory Feb 25 00:30:01 prometheus CRON[11200]: (root) CMD (/usr/sbin/omv- mkrrdgraph >/dev/null 2>&1) Feb 25 00:39:00 prometheus systemd[1]: Starting Clean php session files..
    [Show full text]
  • Red Hat Enterprise Linux Roadmap
    RED HAT ENTERPRISE LINUX ROADMAP Transforming Application Delivery While Protecting Your Application Investments Ron Pacheco, Director, Product Management Karen Noel, Director of Engineering May 2, 2017 Disclaimer The content set forth herein does not constitute in any way a binding or legal agreement or impose any legal obligation or duty on Red Hat. This information is provided for discussion purposes only and is subject to change for any or no reason. MARKET REQUIREMENTS “Light up my hardware.” “Enable my operations.” Circa 2002 Circa 2017 ● Light up my hardware ● Everything I’m used to and... ● Award winning support ● More software available ● Vast ecosystem ● Less software installed ● Peerless security ● Non-disruptive updates ● Lifecycle options ● More automation BRIEF HISTORY OF RED HAT ENTERPRISE LINUX Not pictured: tens of thousands of incremental improvements Control Groups Mandatory access controls Secure Virtualization IBM Power Automated security Real-time kernel IBM Z Series RHEL is born. audits ‘02 ‘03 ‘05 ‘07 ‘10 ‘11 ‘12 ‘13 ‘15 Virtualization Containers Software-defined Cluster file Software-defined Networking systems storage FLEXIBILITY ACROSS DEPLOYMENT TARGETS via a Trusted, Consistent Host Environment RED HAT ENTERPRISE LINUX IS THE FOUNDATION RED HAT ENTERPRISE LINUX ROADMAP Red Hat CY2016 CY2017 Summit CY2018 CY2019 CY2020 2017 RHEL 7 RHEL ATOMIC HOST RHEL FOR REAL TIME .2 .3 .4 .5 .6.5 .7 RHEL FOR SAP APPLICATIONS RHEL FOR SAP HANA RHEL 6 RHEL FOR SAP APPLICATIONS .8 .9 .10 RHEL FOR SAP HANA RHEL 5 .11 SOFTWARE
    [Show full text]
  • Architecture of the Linux Kernel
    Architecture of the Linux kernel Gerion Entrup Felix Herrmann Sophie Matter Elias Entrup Matthias Jakob Jan Eberhardt Mathias Casselt March 21, 2018 Contents 1 Introduction 7 1.1 Overview of Linux components ................................... 7 1.2 License ................................................. 9 2 Process Management 11 2.1 Processes ............................................... 11 2.2 Process creation - Forking a process ................................ 13 2.3 Threads ................................................ 16 3 Scheduling in Linux 17 3.1 Scheduling-Classes .......................................... 17 3.2 Process Categories .......................................... 17 3.3 O(1)-Scheduler ............................................ 18 3.4 Priorities and Timeslices ....................................... 18 3.5 Completely Fair Scheduler ...................................... 19 3.5.1 Implementation details .................................... 20 3.6 Kernel Preemption .......................................... 21 4 Interrupts 23 4.1 Interrupt processing ......................................... 23 4.2 Interrupt entry ............................................ 23 4.3 Event handler ............................................. 24 4.3.1 Example: Generic Top Halve ................................ 24 4.3.2 Example: Handler ...................................... 24 4.4 /proc/interrupts ........................................... 25 4.5 Conclusion .............................................. 25 5 Bottom Halves 27 5.1
    [Show full text]
  • Slab Allocators in the Linux Kernel: SLAB, SLOB, SLUB
    Slab allocators in the Linux Kernel: SLAB, SLOB, SLUB Christoph Lameter, LinuxCon/Düsseldorf 2014 (Revision Oct 3, 2014) The Role of the Slab allocator in Linux • PAGE_SIZE (4k) basic allocation unit via page allocator. • Allows fractional allocation. Frequently needed for small objects that the kernel allocates f.e. for network descriptors. • Slab allocation is very performance sensitive. • Caching. • All other subsystems need the services of the slab allocators. • Terminology: SLAB is one of the slab allocator. • A SLAB could be a page frame or a slab cache as a whole. It's confusing. Yes. System Components around Slab Allocators kmalloc(size, flags) Device kfree(object) Page Drivers kzalloc(size, flags) Allocator kmem_cache_alloc(cahe, flags) kmem_cache_free(object) s Slab e kmalloc_node(size, flags, node) m File allocator a kmem_cache_alloc_node(cache, r F Systems flags, node) s e t c g e a j b P o l l a m S Memory Management User space code Slab allocators available • SLOB: K&R allocator (1991-1999) • SLAB: Solaris type allocator (1999-2008) • SLUB: Unqueued allocator (2008-today) • Design philosophies – SLOB: As compact as possible – SLAB: As cache friendly as possible. Benchmark friendly. – SLUB: Simple and instruction cost counts. Superior Debugging. Defragmentation. Execution time friendly. 1991 1991 Initial K&R allocator 1996 SLAB allocator development subsystem Slab line: Time 2000 2003 SLOB allocator 2004 NUMA SLAB 2007 SLUB allocator 2008 SLOB multilist 2010 2011 SLUB fastpath rework 2013 Common slab code 2014 2014 SLUBification of SLAB Maintainers • Manfred Spraul <SLAB Retired> • Matt Mackall <SLOB Retired> • Pekka Enberg • Christoph Lameter <SLUB, SLAB NUMA> • David Rientjes • Joonsoo Kim Contributors • Alokk N Kataria SLAB NUMA code • Shobhit Dayal SLAB NUMA architecture • Glauber Costa Cgroups support • Nick Piggin SLOB NUMA support and performance optimizations.
    [Show full text]
  • Linux.Kernel.And.Driver.Development
    Linux Kernel and Driver Development Training Linux Kernel and Driver Development Training Gr´egory Cl´ement,Michael Opdenacker, Free Electrons Maxime Ripard, S´ebastienJan, Thomas Petazzoni Embedded Linux Free Electrons Developers c Copyright 2004-2013, Free Electrons. Creative Commons BY-SA 3.0 license. Latest update: March 29, 2013. Document updates and sources: http://free-electrons.com/doc/training/linux-kernel Corrections, suggestions, contributions and translations are welcome! Free Electrons. Kernel, drivers and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com 1/496 Rights to copy c Copyright 2004-2013, Free Electrons License: Creative Commons Attribution - Share Alike 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/legalcode You are free: I to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work I to make derivative works I to make commercial use of the work Under the following conditions: I Attribution. You must give the original author credit. I Share Alike. If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under a license identical to this one. I For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work. I Any of these conditions can be waived if you get permission from the copyright holder. Your fair use and other rights are in no way affected by the above. Free Electrons. Kernel, drivers and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com 2/496 Electronic copies of these documents I Electronic copies of your particular version of the materials are available on: http://free-electrons.com/doc/training/linux-kernel I Open the corresponding documents and use them throughout the course to look for explanations given earlier by the instructor.
    [Show full text]
  • Software Fault Isolation with Api Integrity and Multi-Principal Modules
    Software Fault Isolation with Api Integrity and Multi-Principal Modules The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation Yandong Mao, Haogang Chen, Dong Zhou, Xi Wang, Nickolai Zeldovich, and M. Frans Kaashoek. 2011. Software fault isolation with API integrity and multi-principal modules. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Third ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles (SOSP '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 115-128. As Published http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2043556.2043568 Publisher Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) Version Author's final manuscript Citable link http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/72580 Terms of Use Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Detailed Terms http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ Software fault isolation with API integrity and multi-principal modules Yandong Mao, Haogang Chen, Dong Zhou†, Xi Wang, Nickolai Zeldovich, and M. Frans Kaashoek MIT CSAIL, †Tsinghua University IIIS ABSTRACT complex, irregular kernel interfaces such as the ones found in the The security of many applications relies on the kernel being secure, Linux kernel and exploited by attackers. but history suggests that kernel vulnerabilities are routinely discov- Previous systems such as XFI [9] have used software isola- ered and exploited. In particular, exploitable vulnerabilities in kernel tion [26] to isolate kernel modules from the core kernel, thereby modules are common. This paper proposes LXFI, a system which protecting against a class of attacks on kernel modules. The chal- isolates kernel modules from the core kernel so that vulnerabilities lenge is that modules need to use support functions in the core in kernel modules cannot lead to a privilege escalation attack.
    [Show full text]
  • Ret2dir: Rethinking Kernel Isolation Vasileios P
    ret2dir: Rethinking Kernel Isolation Vasileios P. Kemerlis, Michalis Polychronakis, and Angelos D. Keromytis, Columbia University https://www.usenix.org/conference/usenixsecurity14/technical-sessions/presentation/kemerlis This paper is included in the Proceedings of the 23rd USENIX Security Symposium. August 20–22, 2014 • San Diego, CA ISBN 978-1-931971-15-7 Open access to the Proceedings of the 23rd USENIX Security Symposium is sponsored by USENIX ret2dir: Rethinking Kernel Isolation Vasileios P. Kemerlis Michalis Polychronakis Angelos D. Keromytis Columbia University {vpk, mikepo, angelos}@cs.columbia.edu Abstract equally attractive target. Continuing the increasing trend of the previous years, in 2013 there were 355 reported Return-to-user (ret2usr) attacks redirect corrupted kernel kernel vulnerabilities according to the National Vulnera- pointers to data residing in user space. In response, sev- bility Database, 140 more than in 2012 [73]. Admittedly, eral kernel-hardening approaches have been proposed to the exploitation of user-level software has become much enforce a more strict address space separation, by pre- harder, as recent versions of popular OSes come with nu- venting arbitrary control flow transfers and dereferences merous protections and exploit mitigations. The princi- from kernel to user space. Intel and ARM also recently ple of least privilege is better enforced in user accounts introduced hardware support for this purpose in the form and system services, compilers offer more protections of the SMEP, SMAP, and PXN processor features. Un- against common software flaws, and highly targeted ap- fortunately, although mechanisms like the above prevent plications, such as browsers and document viewers, have the explicit sharing of the virtual address space among started to employ sandboxing.
    [Show full text]
  • Advanced Artifact Analysis
    Advanced artifact analysis Toolset, Artifact analysis training material November 2014 European Union Agency for Network and Information Security www.enisa.europa.eu Advanced artifact analysis Toolset, Artifact analysis training material November 2014 About ENISA The European Union Agency for Network and Information Security (ENISA) is a centre of network and information security expertise for the EU, its member states, the private sector and Europe’s citizens. ENISA works with these groups to develop advice and recommendations on good practice in information security. It assists EU member states in implementing relevant EU legislation and works to improve the resilience of Europe’s critical information infrastructure and networks. ENISA seeks to enhance existing expertise in EU member states by supporting the development of cross-border communities committed to improving network and information security throughout the EU. More information about ENISA and its work can be found at www.enisa.europa.eu. Authors This document was created by Lauri Palkmets, Cosmin Ciobanu, Yonas Leguesse, and Christos Sidiropoulos in consultation with DFN-CERT Services1 (Germany), ComCERT2 (Poland), and S-CURE3 (The Netherlands). Contact For contacting the authors please use [email protected] For media enquires about this paper, please use [email protected] Acknowledgements ENISA wants to thank all institutions and persons who contributed to this document. A special ‘Thank You’ goes to the following contributors: 1. Todor Dragostinov from ESMIS, Bulgaria 2. Michael Ligh from MNIN.ORG, United States 1 Klaus Möller, and Mirko Wollenberg 2 Mirosław Maj, Tomasz Chlebowski, Krystian Kochanowski, Dawid Osojca, Paweł Weżgowiec, and Adam Ziaja 3 Michael Potter, Alan Robinson, and Don Stikvoort Page ii Advanced artifact analysis Toolset, Artifact analysis training material November 2014 Legal notice Notice must be taken that this publication represents the views and interpretations of the authors and editors, unless stated otherwise.
    [Show full text]