DOCSLIB.ORG

5. GAB Epibenthic Report Final

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
5. GAB Epibenthic Report Final Performance Assessment of the Benthic Protection Zone of the Great Australian Bight Marine Park: Epifauna Final report to the South Australian Department for Environment and Heritage and the Commonwealth Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts David R. Currie, Shirley J. Sorokin and Timothy M. Ward August 2008 SARDI Aquatic Sciences Publication No. F2008/000647-1 SARDI Research Report Series No. 299 Performance assessment of the BPZ This publication may be cited as: Currie, D.R. Sorokin, S.J. and Ward, T.M. (2008). Performance Assessment of the Benthic Protection Zone of the Great Australian Bight Marine Park: Epifauna. South Australian Research and Development Institute (Aquatic Sciences), Adelaide. South Australian Research and Development Institute SARDI Aquatic Sciences 2 Hamra Avenue West Beach SA 5024 Telephone: (08) 8207 5400 Facsimile: (08) 8207 5406 http://www.sardi.sa.gov.au Disclaimer: The authors warrant that they have taken all reasonable care in producing this report. The report has been through the SARDI Aquatic Sciences internal review process, and has been formally approved for release by the Editorial Board. Although all reasonable efforts have been made to ensure quality, SARDI Aquatic Sciences and Department for Environment and Heritage do not warrant that the information in this report is free from errors or omissions. SARDI Aquatic Sciences and Department for Environment and Heritage do not accept any liability for the contents of this report or for any consequences arising from its use or any reliance placed upon it. © State of South Australia through the Department for Environment and Heritage You may copy, distribute, display, download and otherwise freely deal with this publication for any purpose subject to the conditions that you (1) attribute the Department as the copyright owner of this publication and that (2) you obtain the prior written consent of the Department for Environment and Heritage if you wish to modify the work or offer the publication for sale or otherwise use it or any part of it for a commercial purpose. Written requests for permission should be addressed to: GABMP Manager, PO BOX 22, Port Lincoln SA 5606. Printed in Adelaide: August 2008 SARDI Aquatic Sciences Publication No. F2008/000647-1 SARDI Research Report Series No. 299 ISBN 978-0-7308-5394-7 Author(s): Dr. David R. Currie, Ms. Shirley J. Sorokin, and Dr. Timothy M. Ward Reviewers: Dr. Jason Tanner and Dr. Stephen Mayfield Approved by: Dr. Qifeng Ye Signed: Date: 28 August 2008 Distribution: South Australian Department for Environment and Heritage; Commonwealth Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts; Consultative Committee of the Great Australian Bight Marine Park; SARDI Aquatic Sciences Library Circulation: Public Domain SARDI Aquatic Sciences Report - Page i Performance assessment of the BPZ TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES .............................................................................................................................III LIST OF TABLES ...............................................................................................................................IV LIST OF APPENDICES......................................................................................................................IV EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................................................... V 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 REGIONAL GEOMORPHOLOGY ............................................................................................... 1 1.3 REGIONAL BIODIVERSITY ...................................................................................................... 2 1.4 THE GREAT AUSTRALIAN BIGHT MARINE PARK ................................................................... 4 1.5 PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF THE BPZ.............................................................................. 4 1.6 RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES ................................................................................................ 5 2 METHODS.................................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 EPIFAUNA .............................................................................................................................. 5 2.2 UNDERWATER VIDEO ............................................................................................................. 7 3 RESULTS...................................................................................................................................... 8 3.1 EPIFAUNA .............................................................................................................................. 8 3.1.1 Faunal composition.......................................................................................................... 8 3.1.2 Spatial and temporal variations in species richness and biomass ................................... 9 3.1.3 Spatial and temporal variations in community structure ............................................... 11 3.1.4 Environmental influences............................................................................................... 13 3.1.5 Adequacy of sampling .................................................................................................... 16 3.2 UNDERWATER VIDEO ........................................................................................................... 17 3.2.1 Topography and habitat structure.................................................................................. 17 3.2.2 Epifaunal classification.................................................................................................. 18 3.2.3 Video vs. sled comparison.............................................................................................. 20 4 DISCUSSION.............................................................................................................................. 23 4.1 SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL VARIABILITY IN EPIFAUNA ........................................................... 23 4.2 SLED SAMPLING EFFICIENCY ................................................................................................ 23 4.3 CONSERVATION SIGNIFICANCE ............................................................................................ 23 4.4 BIODIVERSITY AND ENDEMISM ............................................................................................ 24 4.5 EFFICACY OF UNDERWATER VIDEO FOR NON-DESTRUCTIVE SAMPLING ............................... 24 4.6 20-YEAR PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM................................................................. 26 4.7 FUTURE RESEARCH .............................................................................................................. 27 4.7.1 AUV................................................................................................................................ 27 4.7.2 Swath Bathymetry........................................................................................................... 28 4.7.3 Deep-sea habitats of the BPZ......................................................................................... 29 5 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................... 29 6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ....................................................................................................... 34 SARDI Aquatic Sciences Report - Page ii Performance assessment of the BPZ LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. False-colour bathymetric image of the Great Australian Bight showing the wide continental shelf (brown fill; <200 m depth) and continental slope (yellow fill; 200-4500 m depth) surrounding the Benthic Protection Zone. ..............................................................................................................................................1 Figure 2. Location of study area, sedimentary facies (adapted from James et al., 2001) and Benthic Protection Zone of the Great Australian Bight Marine Park. Closed circles indicate locations of sites sampled for epibenthos during the 2002 pilot survey. Numeric codes denoting nine sedimentary facies are as follows: B, Bryozoan; BB, Branching Bryozoan; BI, Bryozoan Intraclast; I, Intraclast; IBE, Intraclast Bryozoan East; IBW, Intraclast Bryozoan West; IM, Intraclast Mollusc; MI, Mollusc Intraclast; Q, Quartzose Skeletal........3 Figure 3. Epibenthic sled used to collect sessile organisms from 40 sampling sites inside and immediately outside the BPZ during October 2006..........................................................................................................................6 Figure 4. Underwater camera system used to quantify epibenthos and seafloor topography at 11 sampling sites inside the BPZ during October 2006. ..............................................................................................................7 Figure 5. Total (a) wet weight and (b) number of species of each major phylum collected during surveys, and (c) the total number of sites (out of 40) at which specimens belonging to each major phylum were collected. Values for each variable
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Marine Biodiversity of the Northern and Yorke Peninsula NRM Region
    Marine Environment and Ecology Benthic Ecology Subprogram Marine Biodiversity of the Northern and Yorke Peninsula NRM Region SARDI Publication No. F2009/000531-1 SARDI Research Report series No. 415 Keith Rowling, Shirley Sorokin, Leonardo Mantilla and David Currie SARDI Aquatic Sciences PO Box 120 Henley Beach SA 5022 December 2009 Prepared for the Department for Environment and Heritage 1 Marine Biodiversity of the Northern and Yorke Peninsula NRM Region Keith Rowling, Shirley Sorokin, Leonardo Mantilla and David Currie December 2009 SARDI Publication No. F2009/000531-1 SARDI Research Report Series No. 415 Prepared for the Department for Environment and Heritage 2 This Publication may be cited as: Rowling, K.P., Sorokin, S.J., Mantilla, L. & Currie, D.R. (2009) Marine Biodiversity of the Northern and Yorke Peninsula NRM Region. South Australian Research and Development Institute (Aquatic Sciences), Adelaide. SARDI Publication No. F2009/000531-1. South Australian Research and Development Institute SARDI Aquatic Sciences 2 Hamra Avenue West Beach SA 5024 Telephone: (08) 8207 5400 Facsimile: (08) 8207 5406 http://www.sardi.sa.gov.au DISCLAIMER The authors warrant that they have taken all reasonable care in producing this report. The report has been through the SARDI internal review process, and has been formally approved for release by the Chief of Division. Although all reasonable efforts have been made to ensure quality, SARDI does not warrant that the information in this report is free from errors or omissions. SARDI does not accept any liability for the contents of this report or for any consequences arising from its use or any reliance placed upon it.
    [Show full text]
  • Life-History Strategies of a Native Marine Invertebrate Increasingly Exposed to Urbanisation and Invasion
    Temporal Currency: Life-history strategies of a native marine invertebrate increasingly exposed to urbanisation and invasion A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Zoology University of Canterbury New Zealand Jason Suwandy 2012 Contents List of Figures ......................................................................................................................................... iii List of Tables .......................................................................................................................................... vi Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................... vii Abstract ................................................................................................................................................ viii CHAPTER ONE - General Introduction .................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Marine urbanisation and invasion ................................................................................................ 2 1.2 Successful invasion and establishment of populations ................................................................ 4 1.3 Ascidians ....................................................................................................................................... 7 1.4 Native ascidians as study organisms ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of Megafaunal Biodiversity in Two Contrasting Submarine Canyons on Australia's Southern Continental Margin
    A comparison of megafaunal biodiversity in two contrasting submarine canyons on Australia’s southern continental margin David R. Currie and Shirley J. Sorokin SARDI Publication No. F2010/000981-1 SARDI Research Report Series No. 519 SARDI Aquatic Sciences PO Box 120 Henley Beach SA 5022 February 2011 Report to the South Australian Department of Environment and Natural Resources A comparison of megafaunal biodiversity in two contrasting submarine canyons on Australia’s southern continental margin Report to the South Australian Department of Environment and Natural Resources David R. Currie and Shirley J. Sorokin SARDI Publication No. F2010/000981-1 SARDI Research Report Series No. 519 February 2011 Currie, D.R. and Sorokin, S.J. (2011) Canyon biodiversity This Publication may be cited as: Currie, D.R and Sorokin, S.J (2011). A comparison of megafaunal biodiversity in two contrasting submarine canyons on Australia’s southern continental margin. Report to the South Australian Department of Environment and Natural Resources. South Australian Research and Development Institute (Aquatic Sciences), Adelaide. SARDI Publication No. F2010/000981-1. SARDI Research Report Series No. 519. 49pp. South Australian Research and Development Institute SARDI Aquatic Sciences 2 Hamra Avenue West Beach SA 5024 Telephone: (08) 8207 5400 Facsimile: (08) 8207 5406 http://www.sardi.sa.gov.au DISCLAIMER The authors warrant that they have taken all reasonable care in producing this report. The report has been through the SARDI Aquatic Sciences internal review process, and has been formally approved for release by the Chief, Aquatic Sciences. Although all reasonable efforts have been made to ensure quality, SARDI Aquatic Sciences does not warrant that the information in this report is free from errors or omissions.
    [Show full text]
  • Management of the Proposed Geographe Bay Blue Swimmer and Sand Crab Managed Fishery
    Research Library Fisheries management papers Fisheries Research 8-2003 Management of the proposed Geographe Bay blue swimmer and sand crab managed fishery. Jane Borg Follow this and additional works at: https://researchlibrary.agric.wa.gov.au/fr_fmp Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons, Business Administration, Management, and Operations Commons, and the Natural Resources and Conservation Commons Recommended Citation Borg, J. (2003), Management of the proposed Geographe Bay blue swimmer and sand crab managed fishery.. Department of Fisheries Western Australia, Perth. Report No. 170. This report is brought to you for free and open access by the Fisheries Research at Research Library. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fisheries management papers by an authorized administrator of Research Library. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MANAGEMENT OF THE PROPOSED GEOGRAPHE BAY BLUE SWIMMER AND SAND CRAB MANAGED FISHERY A management discussion paper By Jane Borg and Cathy Campbell FISHERIES MANAGEMENT PAPER NO. 170 Department of Fisheries 168 St. George's Terrace Perth WA 6000 August 2003 ISSN 0819-4327 Fisheries Management Paper No. 170 Management of the Proposed Geographe Bay Blue Swimmer and Sand Crab Managed Fishery August 2003 Fisheries Management Paper No. 170 ISSN 0819-4327 2 Fisheries Management Paper No. 170 CONTENTS OPPORTUNITY TO COMMENT................................................................................ 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Natural HISTORY
    I AUSTRAliAN NATURAl HISTORY PUBLISHED QUARTERLY BY THE AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM, 6-B COLLEGE STREET, SYDNEY VOLUME 19 NUMBER 7 PRESIDENT, JOE BAKER DIRECTOR, DESMOND GRIFFIN JULY-SEPTEMBER 1976 THE EARLY MYSTERY OF NORFOLK ISLAND 218 BY JIM SPECHT INSIDE THE SOPHISTICATED SEA SQUIRT 224 BY FRANK ROWE SILK, SPINNERETS AND SNARES 228 BY MICHAEL GRAY EXPLORING MACQUARIE ISLAND 236 PART1 : SOUTH ERN W ILDLIFE OUTPOST BY DONALD HORNING COVER: The Rockhopper I PART 2: SUBANTARCTIC REFUGE Penguin, Eudyptes chryso­ BY JIM LOWRY come chrysocome, a small crested species which reaches 57cm maximum A MICROCOSM OF DIVERSITY 246 adult height. One of the four penguin species which BY JOHN TERRELL breed on Macq uarie Island, they leave for six months every year to spend the IN REVIEW w inter months at sea. SPECTACULAR SHELLS AND OTHER CREATURES 250 (Photo: D.S. Horning.) A nnual Subscription: $6-Australia; $A7.50-other countries except New Zealand . EDITOR Single cop ies: $1 .50 ($1.90 posted Australia); $A2-other countries except New NANCY SMITH Zealand . Cheque or money order payable to The Australian Museum should be sen t ASSISTANT EDITORS to The Secretary, The Australian Museum, PO Box A285, Sydney South 2000. DENISE TORV , Overseas subscribers please note that monies must be paid in Australian currency. INGARET OETTLE DESIGN I PRODUCTION New Zealand Annual Subscription: $NZ8. Cheque or money order payable to the LEAH RYAN Government Printer should be sent to the New Zealand Government Printer, ASSISTANT Private Bag, Wellington. BRONWYN SHIRLEY CIRCULATION Opinions expressed by the authors are their own and do not necessarily represent BRUCE GRAINGER the policies or v iews of The Australian Museum.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Phylogeny of the Families Pyuridae and Styelidae (Stolidobranchiata
    * Manuscript 1 Phylogeny of the families Pyuridae and Styelidae (Stolidobranchiata, Ascidiacea) 2 inferred from mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences 3 4 Pérez-Portela Ra, b, Bishop JDDb, Davis ARc, Turon Xd 5 6 a Eco-Ethology Research Unit, Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada (ISPA), Rua 7 Jardim do Tabaco, 34, 1149-041 Lisboa, Portugal 8 9 b Marine Biological Association of United Kingdom, The Laboratory Citadel Hill, PL1 10 2PB, Plymouth, UK, and School of Biological Sciences, University of Plymouth PL4 11 8AA, Plymouth, UK 12 13 c School of Biological Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong NSW 2522 14 Australia 15 16 d Centre d’Estudis Avançats de Blanes (CSIC), Accés a la Cala St. Francesc 14, Blanes, 17 Girona, E-17300, Spain 18 19 Email addresses: 20 Bishop JDD: [email protected] 21 Davis AR: [email protected] 22 Turon X: [email protected] 23 24 Corresponding author: 25 Rocío Pérez-Portela 26 Eco-Ethology Research Unit, Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada (ISPA), Rua 27 Jardim do Tabaco, 34, 1149-041 Lisboa, Portugal 28 Phone: + 351 21 8811226 29 Fax: + 351 21 8860954 30 [email protected] 31 1 32 Abstract 33 34 The Order Stolidobranchiata comprises the families Pyuridae, Styelidae and Molgulidae. 35 Early molecular data was consistent with monophyly of the Stolidobranchiata and also 36 the Molgulidae. Internal phylogeny and relationships between Styelidae and Pyuridae 37 were inconclusive however. In order to clarify these points we used mitochondrial and 38 nuclear sequences from 31 species of Styelidae and 25 of Pyuridae. Phylogenetic trees 39 recovered the Pyuridae as a monophyletic clade, and their genera appeared as 40 monophyletic with the exception of Pyura.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Distribution of Adeonid Bryozoans (Cheilostomata: Adeonidae)
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: European Journal of Taxonomy Jahr/Year: 2016 Band/Volume: 0203 Autor(en)/Author(s): Hirose Masato Artikel/Article: Diversity and distribution of adeonid bryozoans (Cheilostomata: Adeonidae) in Japanese waters 1-41 European Journal of Taxonomy 203: 1–41 ISSN 2118-9773 http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2016.203 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2016 · Hirose M. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Research article urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:325E4EF8-78F9-49D0-82AF-4C358B24F7F8 Diversity and distribution of adeonid bryozoans (Cheilostomata: Adeonidae) in Japanese waters Masato HIROSE Atmosphere and Ocean Research Institute, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwanoha 5-1-5, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8564, Japan. Email: [email protected] urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:C6C49C49-B4DF-46B9-97D7-79DE2C942214 Abstract. Adeonid bryozoans construct antler-like erect colonies and are common in bryozoan assemblages along the Japanese Pacifi c coast. The taxonomy of Japanese adeonid species, however, has not been studied since their original descriptions more than 100 years ago. In the present study, adeonid specimens from historical collections and material recently collected along the Japanese coast are examined. Eight adeonid species in two genera were detected, of which Adeonella jahanai sp. nov., Adeonellopsis parvirostrum sp. nov., and Adeonellopsis toyoshioae sp. nov. are described as new species based on the branch width, size and morphology of frontal or suboral avicularia, shape and size of areolar pores, and size of the spiramen. Adeonellopsis arculifera (Canu & Bassler, 1929) is a new record for Japan.
    [Show full text]
  • Resource Assessments for Multi-Species Fisheries In
    CM 2007/O:11 Resource assessments for multi-species fisheries in NSW, Australia: qualitative status determination using life history characteristics, empirical indicators and expert review. James Scandol and Kevin Rowling Wild Fisheries Program; Systems Research Branch Division of Science and Research; NSW Department of Primary Industries Cronulla Fisheries Centre; PO Box 21, Cronulla NSW 2230 Not to be cited without prior reference to the authors Abstract As the scope of fisheries management continues to broaden, there is increased pressure on scientific assessment processes to consider a greater number of species. This expanded list of species will inevitably include those with a range of life-history strategies, heterogeneous sources of information, and diverse stakeholder values. When faced with this challenge in New South Wales (Australia), the Department of Primary Industries developed systems and processes that scaled efficiently as the number of species requiring consideration increased. The key aspects of our approach are: • A qualitative determination of exploitation status based upon expert review. The current categories are: growth/recruitment overfished, fully fished, moderately fished, lightly fished, undefined and uncertain. • Application of management rules that require a Species Recovery Program should any species be determined to be overfished. • An emphasis on readily calculated empirical indicators (such as catch, catch-rates, length and age composition), rather than model-based estimates of biomass or fishing mortality. • Use of databases and electronic reporting systems to calculate empirical indicators based upon specified rules. Currently, there are 90 species considered with around six scientific and technical staff. These species were identified by commercial fishers as the important species from five multi-species and multi- method input-controlled fisheries.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Community Monitoring Manual
    Marine Community Monitoring Manual MARINE COMMUNITY MONITORING MANUAL (2ND EDITION) “An early warning system for detecting change in the marine environment” A collaborative project between the Department of Conservation and Land Management (CALM, Marine Conservation Branch); the Australian Marine Conservation Society, Western Australian Branch (AMCS WA); and the Natural Heritage Trust’s (NHT) Coastwest /Coastcare Programme. Funding provided by Coastwest/ Coastcare. An initiative of NHT (Coastwest/ Coastcare programme) and CALM, Marine Conservation Branch. August 2003 Marine Conservation Branch Department of Conservation and Land Management 47 Henry St. Fremantle, Western Australia, 6160 Updated 12/05/03 Page i Marine Community Monitoring Manual ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Direction: • Dr Chris Simpson – Manager, Marine Conservation Branch (MCB), Nature Conservation Division, CALM. Prepared by: • Karen Wheeler - Department of Conservation and Land Management (CALM). Marine Community Monitoring Program Steering Committee: • Nick D’Adamo - CALM; • Martin Heller - Natural Heritage Trust (NHT), Coastwest/ Coastcare; • Nick Dunlop - Australian Marine Conservation Society, Western Australian Branch (AMCS WA); and • Tim Grubba, CALM. Funding and Resources: • Funding has been provided by the NHT, via the Coastwest/ Coastcare Programme. • Resources including scientific and technical assistance, administrative assistance and logistical/ operational support has been provided by CALM. Community Participation: • Many sectors of the community have been involved in developing the Marine Community Monitoring Manual since the programme inception in 1999 and a special thank you is extended to all groups involved. Participating groups have been listed separately in the Manual (Please refer to Part IV, section 1.3). Photographs and images: • Cover page: With permission, Department of Planning and Infrastructure (DPI, Perth). Photograph courtesy of Andrew Halsall, Fast Photos Albany.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalogue of Tunicata in Australian Waters
    CATALOGUE OF TUNICATA IN AUSTRALIAN WATERS P. Kott Queensland Museum Brisbane, Australia 1 The Australian Biological Resources Study is a program of the Department of the Environment and Heritage, Australia. © Commonwealth of Australia 2005 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from the Australian Biological Resources Study, Environment Australia. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the Director, Australian Biological Resources Study, GPO Box 787, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia. National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Kott, P. Catalogue of Tunicata in Australian waters. Bibliography. Includes index. ISBN 0 642 56842 1 [ISBN 978-0-642-56842-7]. 1. Tunicata - Australia. I. Australian Biological Resources Study. II. Title. 596.20994 In this work, Nomenclatural Acts are published within the meaning of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature by the lodgement of a CD Rom in the following major publicly accessible libraries: The Australian Museum Library, Sydney The National Library of Australia, Canberra The Natural History Museum Library, London The Queensland Museum Library, Brisbane The United States National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC The University of Queensland Library, Brisbane The Zoologische Museum Library, University of Amsterdam [International Commission for Zoological Nomenclature (1999). International Code of Zoological Nomenclature 4th ed: 1–126 (Article 8.6)] This CD is available from: Australian Biological Resources Study PO Box Tel:(02) 6250 9435 Int: +(61 2) 6250 9435 Canberra, ACT 2601 Fax:(02) 6250 9555 Int: +(61 2) 6250 9555 Australia Email:[email protected] ii CONTENTS Preface .
    [Show full text]
  • The South Australian Marine Scalefish Fishery Status Report -Analysis Of
    MMSSF Analysis of Fishery Statistics – 2013 The South AAustralianAuustralian stralian Marine Scalefish Fishery Status Report – Analysis ooff Fishery Statistics for 202011 2/13 AJ Fowler, R MMcGarvey, cGarvey, MA Steer and JE FFeeenstraenstra SARDI Publication No. F2007/000565-8 SARDI Research Report Series No. 747 SARDI Aquatic Sciences PPOO Box 120 Henley Beach SA 5022 December 2013 Report to PIRSA Fisheries and Aquaculture i MSF Analysis of Fishery Statistics – 2013 ii MSF Analysis of Fishery Statistics – 2013 The South Australian Marine Scalefish Fishery Status Report – Analysis of Fishery Statistics for 2012/13 Report to PIRSA Fisheries and Aquaculture AJ Fowler, R McGarvey, MA Steer and JE Feenstra SARDI Publication No. F2007/000565-8 SARDI Research Report Series No. 747 December 2013 iii MSF Analysis of Fishery Statistics – 2013 This publication may be cited as: Fowler, A.J., McGarvey, R., Steer, M.A. and Feenstra, J.E. (2013). The South Australian Marine Scalefish Fishery Status Report – Analysis of Fishery Statistics for 2012/13. Report to PIRSA Fisheries and Aquaculture. South Australian Research and Development Institute (Aquatic Sciences), Adelaide. SARDI Publication No. F2007/000565-8. SARDI Research Report Series No. 747. 44pp. South Australian Research and Development Institute SARDI Aquatic Sciences 2 Hamra Avenue West Beach SA 5024 Telephone: (08) 8207 5400 Facsimile: (08) 8207 5406 http://www.sardi.sa.gov.au DISCLAIMER The authors warrant that they have taken all reasonable care in producing this report. The report has been through the SARDI internal review process, and has been formally approved for release by the Research Chief, Aquatic Sciences. Although all reasonable efforts have been made to ensure quality, SARDI does not warrant that the information in this report is free from errors or omissions.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of the Victorian Rock Lobster Fishery Against Commonwealth Guidelines for the Ecologically Sustainable Management of Fisheries
    Assessment of the Victorian Rock Lobster Fishery against Commonwealth Guidelines for the Ecologically Sustainable Management of Fisheries A Submission to Environment Australia Fisheries Victoria Management Report Series; No 3 June 2003 © The State of Victoria, Department of Primary Industries, 2003 This publication is copyright. No part may be reproduced by any process except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. Reproduction and the making available of this material for personal, in-house or non-commercial purposes is authorised, on condition that: • the copyright owner is acknowledged • no official connection is claimed • the material is made available without charge or at cost • the material is not subject to inaccurate, misleading or derogatory treatment. Requests for permission to reproduce or communicate this material in any way not permitted by this licence (or by the fair dealing provisions of the Copyright Act 1968) should be directed to the Fisheries Victoria, Copyright Officer, P.O. Box 500, East Melbourne, Victoria, 3002 ISSN 1448-1693 ISBN Published by the Department of Primary Industries Fisheries Victoria PO Box 500 East Melbourne Victoria 3002 Disclaimer: This publication may be of assistance to you, but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any information in this publication. Fishing regulations are a summary of the law at the time of publication and this brochure cannot be used in court. Fishing laws change from time to time.
    [Show full text]